Exs 101 spr12
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
1 like•386 views
This document provides an overview of an EXS 101 session on career resources. The goals are to find high-quality career information sources online, in books and databases. Students will evaluate the trustworthiness of websites and then research two exercise science careers, adding the sources to a shared document. The session also covers using the library's Career Cruising database to explore careers based on interests and find details on tasks, education requirements, earnings and interviews. Students will locate a book on their chosen career and write a summary comparing the career information from the book and database.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Purdue Research Power Point
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources found on the internet for research purposes. It discusses using search engines effectively, identifying the type of website and its authorship, examining the credibility of the source, determining the depth and scope of information covered, and assessing the date of the information. Key aspects to evaluate include the author's credentials, presence of references, consideration of opposing views, matching the information to the topic being researched, and whether the information is up-to-date. The document recommends corroborating internet sources with other reliable sources whenever possible.
Purdue Research And The Internet
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources found on the internet for research purposes. It emphasizes the importance of carefully examining web sources due to the lack of oversight on the internet. It offers tips for effectively using search engines, identifying the author and purpose of a site, assessing the credibility and depth of information, and determining the date of content. The overall message is that internet sources require more scrutiny than print materials.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for credibility and reliability to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite in a research paper. It outlines several criteria to consider, including assessing the author's credentials, accuracy and bias of the information, date of publication, documentation of sources, and purpose and intended audience of the site. Students are encouraged to think critically about the credibility of online information and not rely solely on free websites, but also use library databases and consult their teacher-librarian for source recommendations.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It discusses checking the domain name to determine the sponsor's reliability. Key questions to consider include the 5 Ws: who wrote it, what is the purpose/content, when was it created/updated, where did the information come from, and why should it be trusted. Additionally, the appearance and functionality of the site should be examined to ensure it is professional, loads quickly, and is easy to navigate. The example shows a student evaluating two dragonfly websites, determining that the .edu site "Dragonflies of Kentucky" would be best for a research project due to more complete information and affiliation with an educational institution.
CRAAP Test PowerPoint
This document provides information on resources for research such as Galileo, Google, and Wikipedia and how to evaluate sources. It discusses:
- Galileo as a database paid for by taxes that searches many databases and contains academic journal articles for high school and college research.
- How to search Galileo using advanced search, clicking "Full Text", and narrowing searches.
- The CRAAP test for evaluating websites and articles based on their currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose.
- Tips for searching Google effectively such as using quotation marks for exact phrases, a minus sign to exclude words, and site operators to limit to specific sites.
Website evaluation
This document outlines criteria for evaluating web pages:
1. Accuracy - It addresses who wrote the page and whether their contact information is available.
2. Authority - It discusses who published the document and checking the domain suffix (e.g. .edu, .org, .com) and whether the author lists credentials.
3. Objectivity - It mentions determining if any bias exists by examining if the site is an advertisement or has an organizational motive and what the site's goals are.
Google and beyond
The document discusses how to effectively search for and evaluate information found on the internet using search engines like Google. It provides tips for searching Google precisely using specific terms, phrases, and operators. It also recommends evaluating sources by looking at indicators like credentials, dates, and documentation. The document suggests using other search engines and curated resources beyond Google to access more of the web and take advantage of human-selected high quality sources.
C.A.R.S. Method for Evaluating Internet Validity
The document outlines the C.A.R.S. method for evaluating website credibility. C.A.R.S. stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. For each category, the document provides goals and questions to consider to determine a website's credibility. Credibility focuses on the author's expertise, Accuracy examines how current and consistent the information is, Reasonableness looks at potential biases, and Support analyzes whether sources can be verified.
Recommended
Purdue Research Power Point
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources found on the internet for research purposes. It discusses using search engines effectively, identifying the type of website and its authorship, examining the credibility of the source, determining the depth and scope of information covered, and assessing the date of the information. Key aspects to evaluate include the author's credentials, presence of references, consideration of opposing views, matching the information to the topic being researched, and whether the information is up-to-date. The document recommends corroborating internet sources with other reliable sources whenever possible.
Purdue Research And The Internet
This document provides guidance on evaluating sources found on the internet for research purposes. It emphasizes the importance of carefully examining web sources due to the lack of oversight on the internet. It offers tips for effectively using search engines, identifying the author and purpose of a site, assessing the credibility and depth of information, and determining the date of content. The overall message is that internet sources require more scrutiny than print materials.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for credibility and reliability to determine if they are appropriate sources to cite in a research paper. It outlines several criteria to consider, including assessing the author's credentials, accuracy and bias of the information, date of publication, documentation of sources, and purpose and intended audience of the site. Students are encouraged to think critically about the credibility of online information and not rely solely on free websites, but also use library databases and consult their teacher-librarian for source recommendations.
Website evaluation
The document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It discusses checking the domain name to determine the sponsor's reliability. Key questions to consider include the 5 Ws: who wrote it, what is the purpose/content, when was it created/updated, where did the information come from, and why should it be trusted. Additionally, the appearance and functionality of the site should be examined to ensure it is professional, loads quickly, and is easy to navigate. The example shows a student evaluating two dragonfly websites, determining that the .edu site "Dragonflies of Kentucky" would be best for a research project due to more complete information and affiliation with an educational institution.
CRAAP Test PowerPoint
This document provides information on resources for research such as Galileo, Google, and Wikipedia and how to evaluate sources. It discusses:
- Galileo as a database paid for by taxes that searches many databases and contains academic journal articles for high school and college research.
- How to search Galileo using advanced search, clicking "Full Text", and narrowing searches.
- The CRAAP test for evaluating websites and articles based on their currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose.
- Tips for searching Google effectively such as using quotation marks for exact phrases, a minus sign to exclude words, and site operators to limit to specific sites.
Website evaluation
This document outlines criteria for evaluating web pages:
1. Accuracy - It addresses who wrote the page and whether their contact information is available.
2. Authority - It discusses who published the document and checking the domain suffix (e.g. .edu, .org, .com) and whether the author lists credentials.
3. Objectivity - It mentions determining if any bias exists by examining if the site is an advertisement or has an organizational motive and what the site's goals are.
Google and beyond
The document discusses how to effectively search for and evaluate information found on the internet using search engines like Google. It provides tips for searching Google precisely using specific terms, phrases, and operators. It also recommends evaluating sources by looking at indicators like credentials, dates, and documentation. The document suggests using other search engines and curated resources beyond Google to access more of the web and take advantage of human-selected high quality sources.
C.A.R.S. Method for Evaluating Internet Validity
The document outlines the C.A.R.S. method for evaluating website credibility. C.A.R.S. stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. For each category, the document provides goals and questions to consider to determine a website's credibility. Credibility focuses on the author's expertise, Accuracy examines how current and consistent the information is, Reasonableness looks at potential biases, and Support analyzes whether sources can be verified.
Website Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It discusses the structure of URLs and top-level domains to determine credibility. Key criteria for evaluation include checking the author's credentials, date of publication, presence of biases, supporting evidence, and intended audience. Students are advised to apply the CARS method of evaluating Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. Suggestions are offered for designing effective internet assignments, such as providing guidance, planning ahead, and not assuming student expertise in differentiating types of online information.
Website Evaluation
How to evaluate websites and characteristics of good website design. Used for lecturing undergrad students in Introduction to Internet and World Wide Web.
Is It CRAP? Using a Memorable Acronym to Teach Critical Website Evaluation Sk...
PowerPoint presentation from our session at the Wisconsin Association of Academic Librarians 2011 Annual Conference: Renew, Energize, Sustain, April 26-29, in Stevens Point, WI.
Identifying Credible Sources for Research Paper and Project in High School
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources found on the internet. It discusses key criteria for evaluating websites such as authority, accuracy, objectivity, and currency. Participants will learn how to use these criteria to effectively evaluate websites and help students develop skills for evaluating online information sources. The document also provides examples of red flags that indicate a source may not be credible and lists several reputable databases and directories for conducting research.
Website evaluation methods power point 2
This presentation discusses methods for evaluating websites for grades 6-8. It covers defining website evaluation, the importance of evaluation based on the lack of standards online, and the AASL standards that evaluation is based on, which focus on inquiry, critical thinking, and knowledge application. The presentation outlines evaluating websites based on 5 areas - authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage - and providing students a form to assess those areas through relevant questions. It emphasizes the "ABCs" of always considering who, what, when, where, and why when evaluating websites.
Website Evaluation For Learning For Life
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites as sources of information and introduces the "ABC" method for website evaluation. It teaches students that they must be "web detectives" to distinguish reliable sources from unreliable ones on the internet. It lists several criteria ("Author", "Bias", "Content", "Dates", "Editor") students should consider when assessing websites for a school assignment on creating anti-smoking ads. Several potential source websites on smoking are provided as examples to evaluate.
Evaluating websites
Presentation of information from Common Sense Media on evaluating websites. Designed for middle school but will be used as refresher for high school students before a research project.
Evaluating Websites For Learners
The document discusses the importance of evaluating websites for learners and provides criteria and tools that teachers can use to evaluate websites. It notes that with the amount of information on the web, evaluating websites is important to find credible sources and prevent learners from accessing inappropriate content. It then provides detailed criteria for teachers to use to evaluate websites, including evaluating the authority, content, and design of websites. Lastly, it discusses alternatives to evaluating websites like using specialized search engines designed for kids and creating a customized search engine.
Evaluating Websites Revised
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the reliability of websites for research purposes. It outlines six criteria to consider: purpose, authority, objectivity, currency, coverage, and design. Specific factors are described for each criteria, such as checking the author's credentials, date of publication/updates, presence of advertising, and organization of information. An example website for the American Heart Association is provided. The document emphasizes that reliable websites will have an identifiable purpose, authoritative authors, objective and up-to-date information presented clearly without bias or errors.
Evaluation Of A Site
This document provides guidance on evaluating the quality and credibility of websites for research and citations. It discusses a number of factors to consider, referred to as CARRDSS, which stand for Credibility, Accuracy, Reliability, Relevance, Date, Sources, and Scope. Credibility factors include considering the author's credentials and expertise, as well as clues about who published the content. Accuracy involves checking if facts can be verified from other reliable sources. Reliability addresses any biases present. Relevance is about how directly the content relates to the research topic. Date refers to when the content was created and last updated. Sources refers to whether the author cited reliable references. Scope examines the depth and intended audience of the content
Website Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It outlines five criteria to consider: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Authority refers to the credentials of the author/sponsor. Accuracy checks for factual errors or inconsistencies. Objectivity considers the balance/bias of perspectives presented. Currency evaluates how recently the site was updated. Coverage assesses the depth/breadth of information provided. Students are advised to apply these criteria to critically analyze a website's value before using it for research. Considering the criteria together provides a holistic evaluation of a website's reliability and usefulness.
5 Factors for Evaluating Websites
This document outlines 5 factors for evaluating websites: authority, currency, content/purpose, audience, and structure/workability. It discusses evaluating who is responsible for the site, how current the information is, what purpose and content the site has, who the intended audience is, and how easy the site is to use.
Evaluating web sites
This presentation discusses how to evaluate the accuracy, authority, objectivity, and currency of websites. It outlines criteria for each category, such as checking that authors are qualified and can be contacted for accuracy; that credentials and domain names indicate legitimate authority; that information is detailed and unbiased rather than advertising; and that content and links are recently updated. The presentation advises considering these factors altogether to determine a website's value for research.
Google and beyond_2009_spring
This document provides an overview of effective search strategies using Google and other search engines. It discusses how Google works by crawling web pages to build its database. When searching Google, it's important to be specific, use academic terms, and specify exact phrases. The document also discusses limiting searches by file type, website, or other parameters. It recommends evaluating the reliability and credibility of websites by examining the domain, author credentials, currency of information, sources cited, and potential biases.
Evaluating websites
This document provides guidance on evaluating online information sources and websites. It discusses evaluating electronic information for accuracy, relevance, appropriateness, comprehensiveness, and bias. It also discusses evaluating new information resources and technological innovations based on their appropriateness for specific tasks. Key factors for evaluating websites discussed include considering who authored the site, what the purpose and potential biases are, when it was created and last updated, where the information comes from, and why the information would be useful. A checklist of "5 W" questions is provided to systematically evaluate websites.
Online Research
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider in determining whether a site meets that standard, such as checking for author credentials, obvious mistakes, biased or inflammatory language, dated content, and usability of navigation. The document advises using search engines like Google to investigate authors and sponsors when information is missing from sites, and provides additional tips for effective online research.
Online Research (2)
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider that can help determine whether a site is a good source of information or not. The document also provides some tips on using search engines like Google to investigate authors, sponsors and potential biases. It recommends additional online research resources available through the HISD library system.
Research Presentation
The document provides information on evaluating sources found on the internet. It discusses how Wikipedia may not be a reliable academic source due to lack of editorial oversight. It also discusses how to determine the authority, objectivity, currency and coverage of a website to evaluate if it is a good source. The document provides examples of citation styles and discusses avoiding plagiarism by properly citing sources.
Online research
This document provides guidance on conducting effective online research. It explains that online research involves using internet resources, especially information on the world wide web, to systematically investigate and study materials to establish facts and reach new conclusions. It recommends starting with a focused question and keywords, then using advanced search techniques like Boolean operators and quotation marks to filter results. It also advises evaluating sources based on criteria like authority, affiliation, audience level, currency, and reliability to find the most credible information from sources like scientific journals and established news sites.
Website Evaluation
The document discusses five criteria for evaluating websites: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It poses questions to help assess each criteria, such as identifying the author and organization, checking for cited sources, looking for evidence of bias, verifying dates, and determining the depth of information covered. Applying these criteria can help determine the usefulness and reliability of the information on a website.
Production Portfolio
I built these mechanicals and art directed the last one for my client, The Boston Public Schools, to compliment their website — which I also branded.
More Related Content
What's hot
Website Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It discusses the structure of URLs and top-level domains to determine credibility. Key criteria for evaluation include checking the author's credentials, date of publication, presence of biases, supporting evidence, and intended audience. Students are advised to apply the CARS method of evaluating Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. Suggestions are offered for designing effective internet assignments, such as providing guidance, planning ahead, and not assuming student expertise in differentiating types of online information.
Website Evaluation
How to evaluate websites and characteristics of good website design. Used for lecturing undergrad students in Introduction to Internet and World Wide Web.
Is It CRAP? Using a Memorable Acronym to Teach Critical Website Evaluation Sk...
PowerPoint presentation from our session at the Wisconsin Association of Academic Librarians 2011 Annual Conference: Renew, Energize, Sustain, April 26-29, in Stevens Point, WI.
Identifying Credible Sources for Research Paper and Project in High School
This document provides guidance on evaluating information sources found on the internet. It discusses key criteria for evaluating websites such as authority, accuracy, objectivity, and currency. Participants will learn how to use these criteria to effectively evaluate websites and help students develop skills for evaluating online information sources. The document also provides examples of red flags that indicate a source may not be credible and lists several reputable databases and directories for conducting research.
Website evaluation methods power point 2
This presentation discusses methods for evaluating websites for grades 6-8. It covers defining website evaluation, the importance of evaluation based on the lack of standards online, and the AASL standards that evaluation is based on, which focus on inquiry, critical thinking, and knowledge application. The presentation outlines evaluating websites based on 5 areas - authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage - and providing students a form to assess those areas through relevant questions. It emphasizes the "ABCs" of always considering who, what, when, where, and why when evaluating websites.
Website Evaluation For Learning For Life
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites as sources of information and introduces the "ABC" method for website evaluation. It teaches students that they must be "web detectives" to distinguish reliable sources from unreliable ones on the internet. It lists several criteria ("Author", "Bias", "Content", "Dates", "Editor") students should consider when assessing websites for a school assignment on creating anti-smoking ads. Several potential source websites on smoking are provided as examples to evaluate.
Evaluating websites
Presentation of information from Common Sense Media on evaluating websites. Designed for middle school but will be used as refresher for high school students before a research project.
Evaluating Websites For Learners
The document discusses the importance of evaluating websites for learners and provides criteria and tools that teachers can use to evaluate websites. It notes that with the amount of information on the web, evaluating websites is important to find credible sources and prevent learners from accessing inappropriate content. It then provides detailed criteria for teachers to use to evaluate websites, including evaluating the authority, content, and design of websites. Lastly, it discusses alternatives to evaluating websites like using specialized search engines designed for kids and creating a customized search engine.
Evaluating Websites Revised
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the reliability of websites for research purposes. It outlines six criteria to consider: purpose, authority, objectivity, currency, coverage, and design. Specific factors are described for each criteria, such as checking the author's credentials, date of publication/updates, presence of advertising, and organization of information. An example website for the American Heart Association is provided. The document emphasizes that reliable websites will have an identifiable purpose, authoritative authors, objective and up-to-date information presented clearly without bias or errors.
Evaluation Of A Site
This document provides guidance on evaluating the quality and credibility of websites for research and citations. It discusses a number of factors to consider, referred to as CARRDSS, which stand for Credibility, Accuracy, Reliability, Relevance, Date, Sources, and Scope. Credibility factors include considering the author's credentials and expertise, as well as clues about who published the content. Accuracy involves checking if facts can be verified from other reliable sources. Reliability addresses any biases present. Relevance is about how directly the content relates to the research topic. Date refers to when the content was created and last updated. Sources refers to whether the author cited reliable references. Scope examines the depth and intended audience of the content
Website Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It outlines five criteria to consider: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Authority refers to the credentials of the author/sponsor. Accuracy checks for factual errors or inconsistencies. Objectivity considers the balance/bias of perspectives presented. Currency evaluates how recently the site was updated. Coverage assesses the depth/breadth of information provided. Students are advised to apply these criteria to critically analyze a website's value before using it for research. Considering the criteria together provides a holistic evaluation of a website's reliability and usefulness.
5 Factors for Evaluating Websites
This document outlines 5 factors for evaluating websites: authority, currency, content/purpose, audience, and structure/workability. It discusses evaluating who is responsible for the site, how current the information is, what purpose and content the site has, who the intended audience is, and how easy the site is to use.
Evaluating web sites
This presentation discusses how to evaluate the accuracy, authority, objectivity, and currency of websites. It outlines criteria for each category, such as checking that authors are qualified and can be contacted for accuracy; that credentials and domain names indicate legitimate authority; that information is detailed and unbiased rather than advertising; and that content and links are recently updated. The presentation advises considering these factors altogether to determine a website's value for research.
Google and beyond_2009_spring
This document provides an overview of effective search strategies using Google and other search engines. It discusses how Google works by crawling web pages to build its database. When searching Google, it's important to be specific, use academic terms, and specify exact phrases. The document also discusses limiting searches by file type, website, or other parameters. It recommends evaluating the reliability and credibility of websites by examining the domain, author credentials, currency of information, sources cited, and potential biases.
Evaluating websites
This document provides guidance on evaluating online information sources and websites. It discusses evaluating electronic information for accuracy, relevance, appropriateness, comprehensiveness, and bias. It also discusses evaluating new information resources and technological innovations based on their appropriateness for specific tasks. Key factors for evaluating websites discussed include considering who authored the site, what the purpose and potential biases are, when it was created and last updated, where the information comes from, and why the information would be useful. A checklist of "5 W" questions is provided to systematically evaluate websites.
Online Research
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider in determining whether a site meets that standard, such as checking for author credentials, obvious mistakes, biased or inflammatory language, dated content, and usability of navigation. The document advises using search engines like Google to investigate authors and sponsors when information is missing from sites, and provides additional tips for effective online research.
Online Research (2)
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate the quality and reliability of websites for research. It identifies six key criteria: authority, accuracy, coverage, objectivity, currency, and navigation. For each criterion, it provides questions to consider that can help determine whether a site is a good source of information or not. The document also provides some tips on using search engines like Google to investigate authors, sponsors and potential biases. It recommends additional online research resources available through the HISD library system.
Research Presentation
The document provides information on evaluating sources found on the internet. It discusses how Wikipedia may not be a reliable academic source due to lack of editorial oversight. It also discusses how to determine the authority, objectivity, currency and coverage of a website to evaluate if it is a good source. The document provides examples of citation styles and discusses avoiding plagiarism by properly citing sources.
Online research
This document provides guidance on conducting effective online research. It explains that online research involves using internet resources, especially information on the world wide web, to systematically investigate and study materials to establish facts and reach new conclusions. It recommends starting with a focused question and keywords, then using advanced search techniques like Boolean operators and quotation marks to filter results. It also advises evaluating sources based on criteria like authority, affiliation, audience level, currency, and reliability to find the most credible information from sources like scientific journals and established news sites.
Website Evaluation
The document discusses five criteria for evaluating websites: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It poses questions to help assess each criteria, such as identifying the author and organization, checking for cited sources, looking for evidence of bias, verifying dates, and determining the depth of information covered. Applying these criteria can help determine the usefulness and reliability of the information on a website.
What's hot (20)
Is It CRAP? Using a Memorable Acronym to Teach Critical Website Evaluation Sk...
Is It CRAP? Using a Memorable Acronym to Teach Critical Website Evaluation Sk...
Identifying Credible Sources for Research Paper and Project in High School
Identifying Credible Sources for Research Paper and Project in High School
Viewers also liked
Production Portfolio
I built these mechanicals and art directed the last one for my client, The Boston Public Schools, to compliment their website — which I also branded.
How Do You Have the Conversation?
Open, honest communication is the foundation of every successful organization or relationship - business or personal. In the accompanying slide presentation is a process that will assist you in developing that foundation. For addititonal information, coaching, consulting or training please contact me using the information on the last slide.
Glue con2011 future_of_net_systems
Understanding the network's role in cloud computing requires understanding the effect of cloud computing on networking. The end result is five key trends in cloud networking, as presented by James Urquhart from Cisco Systems, and author of CNET's The Wisdom of Clouds
Ppt 5 años
La maestra Elena enseña a sus alumnos de 5 años sobre un árbol viejo en el patio de la escuela. El árbol ha estado allí por mucho tiempo y ha visto pasar a muchos niños. Ahora los alumnos aprenden sobre la naturaleza y la importancia de cuidar los árboles.
Presentation Case Comunicação
This document contains text in an unknown language arranged in paragraphs, lines, and tables. It includes letters, numbers, and punctuation. The writing style consists of short phrases and sentences arranged vertically and separated by blank lines.
Jhing Chik Jhing
In India, farmers often commit suicide due to not being able to repay loans taken against their land. The story is about a 10-year-old boy named Shyam who lives with his father, mother, and sister on a small cotton farm. After their cotton crop fails, Shyam's family faces losing their farm and home, and his parents decide on a suicide pact. Shyam overhears this and takes it upon himself to try to save his family by winning a sack race at school with a cash prize.
Guide to Corporate Governance for Subvented Organisations - Executive Summary
The document provides guidance on corporate governance best practices for organizations that receive public funding in Hong Kong. It outlines key principles like having a clear purpose, transparent decision making, and engaging stakeholders. The document discusses establishing an effective board, including composition, roles, and committees. It also covers strategies for planning, budgeting, performance management, transparency, and managing risks. The goal is to help sustain public trust by setting out governance principles and practices for subvented organizations to follow.
Marketing Practitioner S.A,
Philani Mdingi is applying for the Marketing Practitioner SA designation. He has the required qualifications including a sales management diploma, marketing qualification, and copywriting certificate. He also has work experience in areas like project management, copywriting, online marketing, and social media marketing. Mdingi brings a wealth of online marketing experience to the role and can demonstrate a proven track record of client retention and innovative marketing campaigns.
Power point
This document outlines a proposed 3-4 minute documentary about Charlie Burridge, a female racing driver. The documentary will profile her career and experiences as a woman in the male-dominated world of motorsports. It will include footage of her racing as well as interviews discussing her background and future goals. The intended audience is teenagers and older who are interested in motorsports like Formula 1 or those who watch documentary profiles. The documentary will have a modern visual style with sharp camerawork, close-ups, and color/saturation changes in editing. Sound will include engine noises and fast-paced music. Scenes will be filmed at racing circuits and in a studio. The team will share camerawork, editing, and ancillary tasks
Setting the Record Straight: Press Releases that Stand Out in the Digital Age
Join PR Newswire as we discuss ways to leverage multimedia, social media and proper formatting of your press release content to ensure you reach the right audience.
Business Chapter1
This document provides an overview of economic concepts including needs and wants, goods and services, factors of production, different types of economies, supply and demand, gross domestic product, unemployment, inflation, and alternative energy sources. It discusses how the United States has a mixed economy and covers topics like the national debt, oil production/consumption, and different views on drilling for oil in Alaska.
Zebra by Kiara
Zebras live in the savannas of Africa where they eat grass and plants. They migrate to find food and water as the grass turns yellow and dry during parts of the year without much rain. Zebras come in herds and have white bodies with black stripes, standing around 3-5 feet tall. Their stripes help them camouflage from predators like lions and hyenas as they protect their young.
Project Management1
Project management involves planning, organizing, and controlling resources to achieve a specific goal within constraints of time, cost, scope and resources. It includes identifying tasks, estimating durations, assigning resources, and tracking progress to meet the agreed upon specification. A project progresses through defined phases from initiation to completion known as a project life cycle.
Landlord Tenant California Real Estate
This document provides an overview of key aspects of landlord-tenant law in California, including:
- Requisites of a lease include the intention of one party to occupy premises and basic terms like rent amount and duration. Verbal leases for one year or less are binding.
- Land cannot be leased to aliens for agricultural purposes unless they are eligible for citizenship. Leases must be in writing if for more than one year.
- Tenancies can be month-to-month, at will, at sufferance, or by a lodger who occupies part of a building. Forcible entry, detainer, and five days' notice requirements are discussed.
- Other topics covered include sublease
Viewers also liked (20)
Guide to Corporate Governance for Subvented Organisations - Executive Summary
Guide to Corporate Governance for Subvented Organisations - Executive Summary
Setting the Record Straight: Press Releases that Stand Out in the Digital Age
Setting the Record Straight: Press Releases that Stand Out in the Digital Age
Similar to Exs 101 spr12
Evaluating Websites
Students need help learning that just because it came from Google doesn't make it factual. This is a powerpoint lesson that reviews how to evaluate a website. It is used in conjunction with live examples, Nettrekker, and a rubric activity for evaluating websites.
Itc536 web evalpp
The document provides criteria for evaluating websites, including authority, purpose, currency, accuracy, and coverage. For authority, it is important to evaluate the author's credentials and expertise. Purpose determines whether the site aims to inform, promote, or influence. Currency checks if the information is up-to-date by looking at dates. Accuracy has no guarantees as websites rarely have editors, so citations are important. Coverage determines what topics are included and how comprehensive the information is.
Itc536 web evalpp
The document provides criteria for evaluating websites, including authority, purpose, currency, accuracy, and coverage. For authority, it is important to evaluate the author's credentials and expertise. Purpose determines whether the site aims to inform, promote, or influence. Currency checks if the information is up-to-date by looking at dates. Accuracy has no guarantees as websites rarely have editors, so citations are important. Coverage determines what topics are included and how comprehensive the information is.
Academic Research on the Internet is New Library in Rural America
Partial Fullfilment for it648. School districts from rural communities use internet as the new libraries.
Website Evaluation
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, questions are provided to help assess different aspects, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, understanding biases present, and verifying facts through other sources. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and credibility for research.
Using & Creating Social Information
This document summarizes an overview for a class on using and creating social information. It discusses evaluating social media and web resources, professional communication and blogging, citations, and resources for the course. The instructor provides an overview of social information and its pros and cons. Students learn to evaluate websites and practice citing sources. The instructor describes blogging opportunities and discusses National Nutrition Month. The class covers APA citation style and practicing creating citations.
Evaluating Internet Sources
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the credibility and reliability of information found online. It outlines several steps and criteria to consider when assessing a website or web page, including analyzing the domain name and server information to determine the publisher; researching the author's qualifications and potential biases; evaluating the currency and documentation of the information; determining if multiple viewpoints are presented; and assessing the overall purpose and usefulness of the site. The goal is to develop skills for critically examining online information and determining what can validly be proven or concluded based on the source.
Ict seminar ppt
The document discusses criteria for evaluating educational websites for use in teaching. It outlines several criteria teachers should consider, including accuracy, credibility, currency, coverage, objectivity, appropriateness, cost and copyrights. Accuracy refers to conforming to facts and being free from errors. Credibility depends on author credentials and expertise. Currency means the information is up-to-date. Coverage considers the depth and scope of topic information. Objectivity means a lack of bias. Appropriateness refers to suitability for the intended student audience. Cost and copyrights should also be examined. Teachers are encouraged to carefully evaluate websites before sharing information with students.
5Ws Questions to ask while searching
This document provides guidance on researching information and includes the following key points:
1. It is important to plan your research by identifying clear keywords and questions before beginning your search.
2. When evaluating search results, consider factors like the credibility and potential biases of the information source, as well as how up-to-date the information is.
3. Bookmarking and citation tools like Delicious and EasyBM allow you to organize resources and references found during your research.
Web Authoring Principles for Focused and Effective Content
The document discusses principles for effective web authoring and content creation. It emphasizes focusing content on visitors' needs, setting clear goals, selecting authors carefully, training authors, and making content scannable, searchable, and easy to understand for target audiences. The document also provides tips for improving search results, developing scannable pages, writing for audiences, and establishing goals and metrics for websites.
CPD 150: Finding Sources
The document provides instructions for a group project research activity taking place in the Scottsdale Community College library. Students are asked to find with their groups: one book, one newspaper/magazine article, and one website related to their research topic. The document outlines how to use the library website and databases like Academic One File to find these materials. It provides tips for evaluating website authority and credibility for the project.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It examines the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. Additional tips include checking URLs for clues about the domain, considering print and subscription sources, and evaluating blogs based on the author, content, comments, updates, and biases addressed. Students are encouraged to carefully evaluate sources rather than settling for those that are "good enough" and to keep in mind that source quality affects the evaluation of their own work.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It examines the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. CARRDSS stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reliability, Relevance, Date, Sources, Scope. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating online sources to ensure high quality information is being used for research and academic work.
Evaluation Websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability using the CARRDSS method. It discusses evaluating the credibility of authors, accuracy of information, reliability and potential biases, relevance to the topic, date of publication, sources cited, and scope/purpose of the site. Criteria like author credentials, publisher, inclusion of about/contact pages, consistency with other sources, and presence of errors can help determine a site's accuracy and credibility. The domain name suffix can also provide clues about a site's potential biases. High-quality sources are important for research and ensuring informed decision making. Teachers will evaluate student work based on the quality of sources cited.
Wauconda Job Hunting Feb2010
This document summarizes tools and resources for conducting an effective job search online. It discusses job listing sites, networking platforms like LinkedIn, resume builders, researching employers and salaries, and preparing for interviews. Key steps include deciding on a career path through self-assessment, exploring training options, finding potential employers through niche sites, connecting with contacts using online profiles, and practicing interview skills with video resources.
Website Evaluation
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for reliability and quality. It recommends checking the domain name to determine the sponsor, with .edu, .gov and .org domains generally being more reliable. It also recommends considering the 5 W's - Who, What, When, Where, Why - such as checking for the author's credentials, purpose of the site, when it was last updated. Finally, it suggests examining website characteristics like load speed, easy navigation, lack of errors or interfering ads. An example compares two dragonfly websites, finding one superior for research due to more complete information like author and date.
Assessing websites
The document provides guidance on how to evaluate websites for credibility and reliability. It discusses several criteria to consider, referred to as CARRDSS: credibility, accuracy, reliability, relevance, date, sources behind the text, and scope/purpose. For each criterion, clues are provided on aspects to examine, such as considering the author's credentials, checking for errors or inconsistencies, determining when the information was published, and understanding the intended audience and purpose of the content. The document emphasizes the importance of carefully evaluating information sources to ensure reliability and relevance for research.
Cancer
You are going http://independent.academia.edu/WallaceBalla/Posts to shield their identities immediat...
Google and Beyond: Internet Research Skills Optimization
Strategies of online research, optimizing your search engine query techniques, evaluating websites, and other internet research strategies
Criteria
This document provides criteria for evaluating the quality and reliability of information found on websites. It discusses 6 key criteria: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, coverage, and clarity. For each criterion, the document explains why it is important and provides examples of both reliable and unreliable websites to illustrate how to apply each criterion when assessing websites. The overall message is that anyone can publish anything on the internet, so it is important to carefully evaluate websites using established criteria before trusting the information they contain.
Similar to Exs 101 spr12 (20)
Academic Research on the Internet is New Library in Rural America
Academic Research on the Internet is New Library in Rural America
Web Authoring Principles for Focused and Effective Content
Web Authoring Principles for Focused and Effective Content
Google and Beyond: Internet Research Skills Optimization
Google and Beyond: Internet Research Skills Optimization
More from Danielle Carlock
Types of evidence
1. A review article summarizes and synthesizes evidence from multiple primary research studies on a topic.
2. The authors of a review article analyze and interpret research conducted by other researchers.
3. An evidence summary builds upon review articles by critically appraising the available evidence to provide clinicians with recommendations for practice.
Exs 101 research fall13
The document provides an introduction to scientific literature in health professions. It discusses that health fields are evidence-based and rely on scientific research and experimentation. Scholarly journals and research/review articles found within are considered scientific sources and undergo peer review, while magazines, newspapers, and opinions are not. Primary research articles report study results, while review articles synthesize existing research. Trade journals contain practice-oriented articles for professionals.
Understanding Peer Reviewed, Scientific Literature
The document provides an overview of peer-reviewed scientific literature, noting that research articles report original studies conducted by their authors, answer questions about what was found and what it means, and follow a typical format including an abstract, methods, results and discussion sections. It also explains that peer review involves evaluation of an article's methodology and contribution to knowledge by experts in the field prior to publication in a scientific journal. Students are assigned to use at least two peer-reviewed research articles to understand the biology and population trends of their chosen species.
Fon241 dc fall12
Here are the key steps to searching scholarly databases for nutrition information:
1. Choose a database like Medline or CINAHL that indexes nutrition and health journals
2. Enter search terms related to your topic in the database search box
3. Limit your results to scholarly peer-reviewed journals
4. Review the abstracts or full text of articles to evaluate their relevance and reliability
5. Properly cite any articles used in your research
Following these steps will help you efficiently find credible nutrition information from scholarly sources. Let me know if you have any other questions!
Wikipedia article on Veganism
This document discusses the health arguments for following a vegan diet. It notes that studies have shown people eating animal-based diets are more likely to have diseases like heart disease. A vegetarian diet is associated with lower obesity and reduced cardiovascular disease risk. A vegan diet can provide important nutrients but may be low in some nutrients if not planned properly. Several physician studies have argued high animal fat/protein diets can cause health issues, while a low-fat vegan diet can prevent and even reverse diseases like heart disease and diabetes. Long-term studies on vegans have shown lower cholesterol and disease rates.
Popular Article
This document summarizes tips for adopting a vegan diet from two athletes and a nutritionist. It profiles ultramarathon runner Scott Jurek, who adopted a vegan diet that fueled his training with carbohydrates and eliminated heavy fats and meat. Jurek found immediate benefits to his vegan diet, including a leaner body, quicker recovery time, and healthier skin. The article provides advice on getting sufficient protein through foods like pea protein and tips for effective fueling around workouts.
Scholarly Article
A randomized clinical trial compared the effects of a low-fat vegan diet versus a diet following American Diabetes Association (ADA) guidelines on glycemic control and cardiovascular risk factors in individuals with type 2 diabetes. 99 participants were randomly assigned to either a low-fat vegan diet or an ADA diet for 22 weeks. The vegan diet resulted in greater reductions in A1C, body weight, LDL cholesterol, and urinary albumin compared to the ADA diet. Both diets improved glycemic and lipid control, but improvements were greater with the low-fat vegan diet.
Cre101 cameron spr12
The CRAAP test provides a framework to evaluate websites based on their Currency, Relevance, Authority, Accuracy, and Purpose. Questions are posed under each criteria to help determine if a website is current, on your topic, authored by a credible source, backed by evidence, and unbiased. The test aims to assess the quality and reliability of a website for research.
Becoming familiar with research in Exercise Science and related fields
The document discusses various ways that research can be disseminated including through publishing papers in scholarly journals, presenting results at conferences, and publishing books. It also discusses key aspects of scholarly journals like their purpose to disseminate research, regular publication patterns, and inclusion of editorials and book reviews. Examples of relevant journals are provided in specific fields like physical education. The roles of research articles and peer review in scholarly journals are outlined. Finally, it recommends using specialized article databases available through the SCC library webpage to search for journal articles.
Cpd 150 for hrm students
This document provides information about library resources and services available to students at Scottsdale Community College. It outlines the technology available to students like computers and laptop checkout. It describes different study areas and sections for physical library materials like books, periodicals, DVDs and some textbooks. Electronic library materials are accessible online through databases and ebooks. Students need to login with their MEID when accessing electronic resources off campus. The document explains how to get research assistance from the library and outlines the different logins used at SCC for computers and online services.
Article types review
The document discusses different types of research articles, including primary research articles, review articles, and case studies. Primary research articles present original research findings and undergo peer review, while review articles summarize and critically evaluate previous research on a topic and may also be peer reviewed. Case studies provide an in-depth look at a single patient or case and aim to identify new areas for further research.
Nur151 spr12 dcmb
The document provides information about databases and the internet for research. It describes the differences between databases and the internet, including that databases contain focused, organized information while the internet contains a broad range of both organized and unorganized information. It then describes two health databases - CINAHL and Medline. CINAHL contains nursing and allied health journal articles while Medline contains medical articles from a wide range of health fields. Contact information is provided for three librarians who can assist with research.
Bio181 spr12-dc
This document provides instruction on how to conduct academic research. It begins by outlining the session's learning objectives, which are to learn how to search the library catalog for books, determine journal holdings at different libraries, identify primary and secondary research articles, and complete a library assignment. It then covers topics like searching the catalog for books, checking if a library has a specific journal, and determining if a library has access to a particular article based on its publication date range. The document explains the peer review process and distinguishes between primary research articles, review articles, and secondary sources. It provides examples and guidelines for identifying different article types and determining if they are peer reviewed. The document concludes by offering next steps and resources for research help.
Tech tools presentation, 2012
The document discusses using iPads to provide hands-on information literacy instruction in various courses at a college. 33 instruction sessions were conducted across different subject areas using iPads. Students learned skills like accessing and evaluating information and using it ethically. Sessions were customized for different courses. Feedback found most students and faculty were highly engaged during the iPad sessions and found them effective. The iPad sessions brought interactive instruction to any classroom and exposed students to new technologies while improving engagement and effectiveness.
Eng 102 Spr '12
This document provides information and instructions for students regarding research assignments. It includes:
- Contact information for Danielle Carlock
- An overview of three assignments requiring students to find 3 books and 4-5 periodical articles
- A table comparing different information types and how they are reviewed
- Instructions on using Google versus library resources to search for books and articles
- A note that one student will be called up to demonstrate searching the first page of Google hits
Eng 071 aragona dc_fall11
The document provides options for topics to write about, including a worthwhile career, worthwhile cause, interesting subject to educate peers on, or a current event. It instructs the reader to choose a topic category and write it on a whiteboard. If unsure, the reader can write the topic category they are interested in learning more about. Background information and details are requested to be provided for the chosen topic.
Eng 071 aragona dc_fall11
The document provides options and guidance for choosing a topic to research and present on. It lists four topic categories: worthwhile careers, worthwhile causes, interesting subjects to educate peers on, and current events. It instructs to choose a category and write the topic on a whiteboard. It then lists sources like magazines, newspapers, books, and websites that can be used and provides tips on finding articles through library databases versus web searches. Library databases are limited to news articles but provide free access, while web searches may require payment to access full articles.
Article types review
There are several types of articles one may encounter when conducting research in the health sciences. Primary research articles present the findings of original research studies and include the methodology. Review articles provide a critical evaluation of recent research on a topic and come in three forms: literature reviews which summarize existing research; systematic reviews which use a rigorous process to synthesize multiple studies; and meta-analyses which statistically combine the results of several studies. Case studies report on the details of a single patient and aim to explore new avenues for research rather than make broad generalizations. It is important to understand the differences between these article types to identify relevant and high-quality evidence.
Research for the team presentations
This document provides guidance for finding high quality resources for team presentations. It outlines various sources such as websites, newspaper and journal articles, books, and statistics. It introduces a libguide created for the topic areas and evaluating websites. Article databases are recommended for finding magazine, newspaper, and journal articles. The document also provides tips for using the library catalog to find books versus e-books and offers contact information for further research help.
Exs 100 fall11 dc
This document provides an overview of the goals and activities for an EXS 101 session. The session will focus on finding high-quality career resources and research articles in exercise science. Students will evaluate the trustworthiness of different websites and learn how to use the library catalog and databases to find career information, books, and journal articles. They will also learn about the peer review process and important journals in the field of exercise science, such as the Journal of Physical Education, Recreation, and Dance and the Journal of Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise.
More from Danielle Carlock (20)
Understanding Peer Reviewed, Scientific Literature
Understanding Peer Reviewed, Scientific Literature
Becoming familiar with research in Exercise Science and related fields
Becoming familiar with research in Exercise Science and related fields
Recently uploaded
一比一原版布拉德福德大学毕业证（bradford毕业证）如何办理
一模一样【微信：A575476】【布拉德福德大学毕业证（bradford毕业证）成绩单Offer】【微信：A575476】（留信学历认证永久存档查询）采用学校原版纸张、特殊工艺完全按照原版一比一制作（包括：隐形水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠，文字图案浮雕，激光镭射，紫外荧光，温感，复印防伪）行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备，十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，业务范围有加拿大、英国、澳洲、韩国、美国、新加坡，新西兰等学历材料，包您满意。
【业务选择办理准则】
一、工作未确定，回国需先给父母、亲戚朋友看下文凭的情况，办理一份就读学校的毕业证【微信：A575476】文凭即可
二、回国进私企、外企、自己做生意的情况，这些单位是不查询毕业证真伪的，而且国内没有渠道去查询国外文凭的真假，也不需要提供真实教育部认证。鉴于此，办理一份毕业证【微信：A575476】即可
三、进国企，银行，事业单位，考公务员等等，这些单位是必需要提供真实教育部认证的，办理教育部认证所需资料众多且烦琐，所有材料您都必须提供原件，我们凭借丰富的经验，快捷的绿色通道帮您快速整合材料，让您少走弯路。
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
→ 【关于价格问题（保证一手价格）
我们所定的价格是非常合理的，而且我们现在做得单子大多数都是代理和回头客户介绍的所以一般现在有新的单子 我给客户的都是第一手的代理价格，因为我想坦诚对待大家 不想跟大家在价格方面浪费时间
对于老客户或者被老客户介绍过来的朋友，我们都会适当给一些优惠。
选择实体注册公司办理，更放心，更安全！我们的承诺：可来公司面谈，可签订合同，会陪同客户一起到教育部认证窗口递交认证材料，客户在教育部官方认证查询网站查询到认证通过结果后付款，不成功不收费！
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
Jill Pizzola's tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS in Marlton, New Jersey, from 2018 to 2023, was marked by innovation and excellence.
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
The journey toward landing your dream job can be both exhilarating and nerve-wracking. As you navigate through the intricate web of job applications, interviews, and follow-ups, it’s crucial to steer clear of common pitfalls that could hinder your chances. Let’s delve into some of the most frequent mistakes applicants make during the job application process and explore how you can sidestep them. Plus, we’ll highlight how Alliance Job Search can enhance your local job hunt.
Resumes, Cover Letters, and Applying Online
This webinar showcases resume styles and the elements that go into building your resume. Every job application requires unique skills, and this session will show you how to improve your resume to match the jobs to which you are applying. Additionally, we will discuss cover letters and learn about ideas to include. Every job application requires unique skills so learn ways to give you the best chance of success when applying for a new position. Learn how to take advantage of all the features when uploading a job application to a company’s applicant tracking system.
Tape Measure Training & Practice Assessments.pdf
Mastering the Tape Measure is designed to equip employees with the knowledge and skills necessary to confidently and accurately use a tape measure.
Switching Careers Slides - JoyceMSullivan SocMediaFin - 2024Jun11.pdf
Joyce M Sullivan, Founder & CEO of SocMediaFin, Inc. shares her "Five Questions - The Story of You", "Reflections - What Matters to You?" and "The Three Circle Exercise" to guide those evaluating what their next move may be in their careers.
Job Finding Apps Everything You Need to Know in 2024
SnapJob is revolutionizing the way people connect with work opportunities and find talented professionals for their projects. Find your dream job with ease using the best job finding apps. Discover top-rated apps that connect you with employers, provide personalized job recommendations, and streamline the application process. Explore features, ratings, and reviews to find the app that suits your needs and helps you land your next opportunity.
IT Career Hacks Navigate the Tech Jungle with a Roadmap
Feeling overwhelmed by IT options? This presentation unlocks your personalized roadmap! Learn key skills, explore career paths & build your IT dream job strategy. Visit now & navigate the tech world with confidence! Visit https://www.basecamp.com.sg for more details.
Gabrielle M. A. Sinaga Portfolio, Film Student (2024)
My portfolio as a highly motivated film student pursuing a career in Yogyakarta.
Learnings from Successful Jobs Searchers
Are you interested to know what actions help in a job search? This webinar is the summary of several individuals who discussed their job search journey for others to follow. You will learn there are common actions that helped them succeed in their quest for gainful employment.
Leadership Ambassador club Adventist module
Aims to equip people who aspire to become leaders with good qualities,and with Christian values and morals as per Biblical teachings.The you who aspire to be leaders should first read and understand what the ambassador module for leadership says about leadership and marry that to what the bible says.Christians sh
How to Prepare for Fortinet FCP_FAC_AD-6.5 Certification?
Begin Your Preparation Here: https://bit.ly/3VfYStG — Access comprehensive details on the FCP_FAC_AD-6.5 exam guide and excel in the Fortinet Certified Professional - Network Security certification. Gather all essential information including tutorials, practice tests, books, study materials, exam questions, and the syllabus. Solidify your knowledge of Fortinet FCP_FAC_AD-6.5 certification. Discover everything about the FCP_FAC_AD-6.5 exam, including the number of questions, passing percentage, and the time allotted to complete the test.
Recently uploaded (20)
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
Jill Pizzola's Tenure as Senior Talent Acquisition Partner at THOMSON REUTERS...
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
Status of Women in Pakistan.pptxStatus of Women in Pakistan.pptx
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
5 Common Mistakes to Avoid During the Job Application Process.pdf
Switching Careers Slides - JoyceMSullivan SocMediaFin - 2024Jun11.pdf
Switching Careers Slides - JoyceMSullivan SocMediaFin - 2024Jun11.pdf
Job Finding Apps Everything You Need to Know in 2024
Job Finding Apps Everything You Need to Know in 2024
IT Career Hacks Navigate the Tech Jungle with a Roadmap
IT Career Hacks Navigate the Tech Jungle with a Roadmap
Gabrielle M. A. Sinaga Portfolio, Film Student (2024)
Gabrielle M. A. Sinaga Portfolio, Film Student (2024)
How to Prepare for Fortinet FCP_FAC_AD-6.5 Certification?
How to Prepare for Fortinet FCP_FAC_AD-6.5 Certification?
Leave-rules.ppt CCS leave rules 1972 for central govt employees
Leave-rules.ppt CCS leave rules 1972 for central govt employees
Exs 101 spr12
- 1. EXS 101 Danielle Carlock 480 425-6765 d.carlock@sccmail.maricopa.edu
- 2. GOALS OF SESSION Find high quality career resources On the web In books In databases
- 3. Using the web for career information First we will do an exercise which requires you to determine whether a website is trustworthy or not. You will go to 3 websites (printed out and displayed on the walls!) Determine whether each is trustworthy or not. Be prepared to tell us why or why not.
- 4. The Sites http://careerplanning.about.com/od/occupation s/p/phys_therapist.htm http://www.bls.gov/oco/ocos080.htm http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt= AhyYhN50j29TpdeuWnXlHIEjzKIX;_ylv=3?qid =20090809095020AAa0gvn
- 5. EVALUATING WEBSITES CRITERIA DESCRIPTION Is the author stated? Does he/she have education or experience related to the AUTHORITY subject? If the site is sponsored by an organization, is it reputable? Is contact information available? Is the site free of obvious errors? Does the author give proper attribution to ACCURACY borrowed information or knowledge? Does the author have a bias, taking a position on an issue, or giving only one OBJECTIVIT side of the story? Is the site designed to promote or sell a service or product? Y Does this website contain the kind of information that I need? Does the site CONTENT offer something unique that is not found elsewhere? Is the subject well- researched and covered comprehensively? Does the web page show when it was last updated? How current are the CURRENCY links? Have some expired or moved?
- 6. Who’s website is this & why should I trust it? Look at the domain to get an overall sense of what type of website it is: DOMAIN DESCRIPTION .EDU College/university or K-12 school; sites can be official pages of the institution or personal pages (of faculty, students, etc) .COM OR .NET Commercial organizations (i.e. companies, corporations). Might be the official pages of the company. May also be personal pages hosted by a company. .ORG Non profit organization (charities, foundations, service organizations). .GOV Official US government websites.
- 7. CAREER RESEARCH ON THE WEB With your partner, choose two careers related to exercise science that interest you. Use your web evaluation skills to locate one high quality site on each career. Go to the Google doc and add a description of each site http://tinyurl.com/7vuddy3
- 8. Using a career database-Career Cruising The library subscribes to a career database that: Helps you find a career based on interests, abilities, etc Helps you learn about the career including Core tasks and workplace descriptions Required education/training Earnings Interviews with people in that career
- 9. FINDING CAREER BOOKS Use the library catalog ( a special search engine) on the library’s website to locate paper or electronic books.
- 10. Career Research Assignment Locate a paper or electronic book that includes information on your chosen career. Look up your career on the Career Cruising database. Using these two information sources, write a summary in paragraph form about your career that includes the following: What education or training is required in order to enter this career? What are some of the main job duties? What is the typical salary (either starting or average salary)? What do you think you would like about the career? Dislike?