Evaluating Websites
•Download as PPT, PDF•
1 like•861 views
The document provides guidelines for evaluating websites using 5 criteria: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It examines websites related to Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and a fictitious site as examples, noting issues with an inaccurate medical site. The document concludes by announcing a post-test on the topic.
Report
Share
Report
Share
![The 5 Steps To Evaluating Websites ,[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object],[object Object]]()
Recommended
Itc536 web evalpp
The document provides criteria for evaluating websites, including authority, purpose, currency, accuracy, and coverage. For authority, it is important to evaluate the author's credentials and expertise. Purpose determines whether the site aims to inform, promote, or influence. Currency checks if the information is up-to-date by looking at dates. Accuracy has no guarantees as websites rarely have editors, so citations are important. Coverage determines what topics are included and how comprehensive the information is.
Evaluating information on the web
A basic presentation for evaluating resources on the web and what are search engines, directories and meta search engines
Evaluating information on the web
This document provides guidance on evaluating information found on the web. It discusses evaluating the author, date of publication, purpose and bias, relevance, authority and reliability, supporting evidence, and currency. Key factors to consider include who published the information, when it was published, why it was created, and whether it is objective. Signs of unreliable sites include wanting to sell something, unclear authorship, out-of-date information, less reliable domain extensions like .com, asking for personal information, and landing on Wikipedia. Reliable sources tend to come from government bodies, academic institutions, and professional organizations.
Website evaluation
This document outlines criteria for evaluating web pages:
1. Accuracy - It addresses who wrote the page and whether their contact information is available.
2. Authority - It discusses who published the document and checking the domain suffix (e.g. .edu, .org, .com) and whether the author lists credentials.
3. Objectivity - It mentions determining if any bias exists by examining if the site is an advertisement or has an organizational motive and what the site's goals are.
Information Evaluation
This document discusses how to evaluate information sources. It provides criteria for evaluating authority, accuracy, objectivity, and currency of information. For authority, it considers who created the content and their credentials. For accuracy, it discusses verifying facts and citing reliable sources. For objectivity, it examines biases in presentation and purpose. For currency, it looks at when the content was created and last updated. Questions are provided for each criteria to help guide evaluation. The document also contrasts searching the web versus library databases.
Evaluating web sites
This presentation discusses how to evaluate the accuracy, authority, objectivity, and currency of websites. It outlines criteria for each category, such as checking that authors are qualified and can be contacted for accuracy; that credentials and domain names indicate legitimate authority; that information is detailed and unbiased rather than advertising; and that content and links are recently updated. The presentation advises considering these factors altogether to determine a website's value for research.
Web page evaluation Kim Reed
A slide presentation for undergraduates to review explaining how to select an authoritative source on the Internet.
Evaluating sources
The CRAAP test is an evaluation tool used when assessing the credibility, authorship, and possible uses of online resources.
Handout collboratively designed by Information Fluency Team, Red Deer College, Fall 2010. Adapted from various sources.
Recommended
Itc536 web evalpp
The document provides criteria for evaluating websites, including authority, purpose, currency, accuracy, and coverage. For authority, it is important to evaluate the author's credentials and expertise. Purpose determines whether the site aims to inform, promote, or influence. Currency checks if the information is up-to-date by looking at dates. Accuracy has no guarantees as websites rarely have editors, so citations are important. Coverage determines what topics are included and how comprehensive the information is.
Evaluating information on the web
A basic presentation for evaluating resources on the web and what are search engines, directories and meta search engines
Evaluating information on the web
This document provides guidance on evaluating information found on the web. It discusses evaluating the author, date of publication, purpose and bias, relevance, authority and reliability, supporting evidence, and currency. Key factors to consider include who published the information, when it was published, why it was created, and whether it is objective. Signs of unreliable sites include wanting to sell something, unclear authorship, out-of-date information, less reliable domain extensions like .com, asking for personal information, and landing on Wikipedia. Reliable sources tend to come from government bodies, academic institutions, and professional organizations.
Website evaluation
This document outlines criteria for evaluating web pages:
1. Accuracy - It addresses who wrote the page and whether their contact information is available.
2. Authority - It discusses who published the document and checking the domain suffix (e.g. .edu, .org, .com) and whether the author lists credentials.
3. Objectivity - It mentions determining if any bias exists by examining if the site is an advertisement or has an organizational motive and what the site's goals are.
Information Evaluation
This document discusses how to evaluate information sources. It provides criteria for evaluating authority, accuracy, objectivity, and currency of information. For authority, it considers who created the content and their credentials. For accuracy, it discusses verifying facts and citing reliable sources. For objectivity, it examines biases in presentation and purpose. For currency, it looks at when the content was created and last updated. Questions are provided for each criteria to help guide evaluation. The document also contrasts searching the web versus library databases.
Evaluating web sites
This presentation discusses how to evaluate the accuracy, authority, objectivity, and currency of websites. It outlines criteria for each category, such as checking that authors are qualified and can be contacted for accuracy; that credentials and domain names indicate legitimate authority; that information is detailed and unbiased rather than advertising; and that content and links are recently updated. The presentation advises considering these factors altogether to determine a website's value for research.
Web page evaluation Kim Reed
A slide presentation for undergraduates to review explaining how to select an authoritative source on the Internet.
Evaluating sources
The CRAAP test is an evaluation tool used when assessing the credibility, authorship, and possible uses of online resources.
Handout collboratively designed by Information Fluency Team, Red Deer College, Fall 2010. Adapted from various sources.
Evaluating websites presentation
This document discusses how to evaluate websites for reliability and credibility. It introduces the "5 Ws" approach to website evaluation: examining who authored the site, what its purpose is, when it was created and last updated, where the information comes from, and why the information would be useful. The document provides guidance on each of these questions, such as checking for author expertise, signs of bias, currency of information, domain type, and purpose alignment. Readers are instructed to use this framework to determine if an assigned website can be considered trustworthy and appropriate for research.
Research power point for students
This document provides guidance on effective internet searching strategies. It discusses defining your search topic, identifying appropriate search locations, developing effective search queries, and evaluating the credibility of sources. Key recommendations include planning your search offline first by identifying questions and keywords. When searching, consider specialized databases and directories instead of only major search engines. Techniques for evaluating sources include examining the URL, domain, author credentials, and date of publication. Sources should be cross-referenced from different credible locations.
Choosing Online Sources
The document outlines the CARS method for evaluating online sources, which stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. It discusses evaluating sources based on these four criteria, with credibility focusing on the author and organization, accuracy on whether the information is up-to-date and factual, reasonableness on whether the information is objective or biased, and support on how reliable the sources cited within the resource are. Examples are provided for applying each aspect of CARS to analyze online information sources.
Think Like A Librarian
This is a slideshow for Month 4 of the Metronet Information Literacy Initiative. In this Month we're introducing database searching to participants.
Think Like A Librarian
This is a slightly modified version of Think Like a Librarian for a different school district I'm working with.
1 - Evaluating sources' credibility bb
This document discusses how to evaluate the reliability of sources. It explains that sources written by experts are generally more reliable than sources like Wikipedia where authors may lack thorough knowledge. Additionally, it notes that anyone can post information online so readers must think critically. The document provides examples of secondary sources that are often reliable if evaluated carefully, such as books, newspapers, and peer-reviewed research. It outlines criteria for assessing sources' usefulness, credibility, and potential for bias.
Website Evaluation
How to evaluate websites and characteristics of good website design. Used for lecturing undergrad students in Introduction to Internet and World Wide Web.
Eval websites
The document introduces the CRAAP test, which is a list of questions to help evaluate information found during searches. The CRAAP test criteria includes currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. Different criteria may be more important depending on the situation or need. The document then lists questions for each criteria to help determine the quality and reliability of information.
Research Presentation
The document provides information on evaluating sources found on the internet. It discusses how Wikipedia may not be a reliable academic source due to lack of editorial oversight. It also discusses how to determine the authority, objectivity, currency and coverage of a website to evaluate if it is a good source. The document provides examples of citation styles and discusses avoiding plagiarism by properly citing sources.
WordCamp Miami 2015: Using Expertise, Authority and Trust in Your Content to ...
This document discusses how to boost search engine ranking by establishing expertise, authority, and trust (E.A.T.) in website content. It recommends deciding on areas of expertise to focus content, developing high-quality, relevant material, and linking to other authoritative sources. Authority comes from external links and citations as well as a site's reputation. Trust is built through transparency, citations, credentials, and truthful information. Higher standards apply to content impacting users' well-being. Clean, organized content demonstrating verifiable expertise raises E.A.T.
Web site evaluation
There are several criteria for evaluating websites, including authority, currency, accuracy, purpose, ease of use, and coverage. Websites should clearly indicate who authored the content and when it was last updated. The purpose of the site should also be apparent. Good websites are easy to navigate, have accurate and up-to-date information, and provide an unbiased viewpoint on their topic.
Reliable Websites
The document provides tips for evaluating the reliability of websites. It suggests asking questions about the authority, objectivity, authenticity, and timeliness of the information. Additional factors to consider include advertisements, publishing dates, citing sources, and the URL domain name. The document also discusses Boolean search operators that can be used to broaden or narrow search results. Sources are provided for further reading on basic and advanced search techniques and evaluating internet resources.
EvaluatingWebResources
This document discusses searching the web and evaluating web resources. It explains the differences between major search engines like Google and meta search engines like DogPile. It provides tips for effective searching using operators like "+" and quotation marks. The document also reviews how to analyze URLs and file structures to evaluate the authenticity of web sources. It identifies types of web resources to approach critically like vanity publishing and advertising sites.
Google and beyond_2009_spring
This document provides an overview of effective search strategies using Google and other search engines. It discusses how Google works by crawling web pages to build its database. When searching Google, it's important to be specific, use academic terms, and specify exact phrases. The document also discusses limiting searches by file type, website, or other parameters. It recommends evaluating the reliability and credibility of websites by examining the domain, author credentials, currency of information, sources cited, and potential biases.
Designing activities for online learning
This document discusses designing activities for online learning. It outlines five models of learning design: teaching approaches, experiential learning cycle, 5 stages model, and supporting online interaction. The experiential learning cycle places student activities at the core and forms a cycle of concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. Technology can support each stage, through simulations, videos, discussion boards, podcasts, and student-created artifacts. When designing activities, instructors should consider student preferences, demand for technology, and supporting reflection, conceptualization, and experimentation.
5 criteria evaluating websites
This document outlines 5 criteria for evaluating websites: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It defines each criteria and provides questions to consider and signs to look for to determine if a website meets each criteria. For example, for accuracy it suggests checking who wrote the content and their qualifications, for authority it suggests evaluating who published the content and their credentials, and for currency it suggests determining when the content was created and last updated and if links are broken. Overall, the document provides a framework and questions to systematically evaluate the reliability of information on a website.
Plagiarism Data Driven Instruction
This document discusses plagiarism and proper citation of sources. It defines plagiarism as using another person's work without giving them credit. It also notes that ideas influenced by another work must be cited even if not directly quoted. The document then discusses types of plagiarism like copying work word for word or tweaking sentences from multiple sources. It provides statistics showing students who cited sources received higher grades than those who did not properly cite. The school policy considers plagiarism a serious matter that can result in penalties or course failure for repeated offenses.
Searching the Web
This document provides tips and strategies for effective web searching. It discusses different types of search tools like search engines, metasearch engines, and library portals. It outlines best practices for developing search strategies, evaluating results, and identifying misinformation online. Key evaluation criteria for assessing the accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage of websites are also presented.
Difference between web 1.0 and 2.0
Web 1.0 involved large equipment controlled by media institutions to create and distribute content on a one-way basis according to scheduled programming. Web 2.0 allows individuals to create and share content using affordable devices and distribute it through websites for user-generated content. It enables more interactivity as people contribute freely to help others and develop new ideas through conversations. However, the information on websites may not always be reliable.
Searching the Web of Data (Tutorial)
These are slides of a tutorial at ECIR by Gerard de Melo and Katja Hose.
Search is currently undergoing a major paradigm shift away from the traditional document-centric “10 blue links” towards more explicit and actionable information. Recent advances in this area are Google’s Knowledge Graph, Virtual Personal Assistants such as Siri and Google Now, as well as the now ubiquitous entity-oriented vertical search results for places, products, etc. Apart from novel query understanding methods, these developments are largely driven by structured data that is blended into the Web Search experience. We discuss efficient indexing and query processing techniques to work with large amounts of structured data. Finally, we present query interpretation and understanding methods to map user queries to these structured data sources.
5 Criteria for Evaluating Web Sites
The document outlines 5 criteria for evaluating websites: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It defines each criteria, such as checking an author's credentials under authority and determining if information is outdated under currency. The overall summary is to carefully examine websites based on these 5 criteria to determine their reliability and how well they meet the needs of the user.
Web 1.0 and Web 2.0
The document discusses the evolution of the web from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0. Web 1.0 focused on commerce, while Web 2.0 emphasizes user participation through tools that allow users to tag, blog, comment and modify content. Key principles of Web 2.0 include harnessing collective intelligence by allowing users to contribute value and providing services rather than products. Web 2.0 provides benefits like reduced costs, increased loyalty, and better search engine optimization through its distributed nature.
More Related Content
What's hot
Evaluating websites presentation
This document discusses how to evaluate websites for reliability and credibility. It introduces the "5 Ws" approach to website evaluation: examining who authored the site, what its purpose is, when it was created and last updated, where the information comes from, and why the information would be useful. The document provides guidance on each of these questions, such as checking for author expertise, signs of bias, currency of information, domain type, and purpose alignment. Readers are instructed to use this framework to determine if an assigned website can be considered trustworthy and appropriate for research.
Research power point for students
This document provides guidance on effective internet searching strategies. It discusses defining your search topic, identifying appropriate search locations, developing effective search queries, and evaluating the credibility of sources. Key recommendations include planning your search offline first by identifying questions and keywords. When searching, consider specialized databases and directories instead of only major search engines. Techniques for evaluating sources include examining the URL, domain, author credentials, and date of publication. Sources should be cross-referenced from different credible locations.
Choosing Online Sources
The document outlines the CARS method for evaluating online sources, which stands for Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, and Support. It discusses evaluating sources based on these four criteria, with credibility focusing on the author and organization, accuracy on whether the information is up-to-date and factual, reasonableness on whether the information is objective or biased, and support on how reliable the sources cited within the resource are. Examples are provided for applying each aspect of CARS to analyze online information sources.
Think Like A Librarian
This is a slideshow for Month 4 of the Metronet Information Literacy Initiative. In this Month we're introducing database searching to participants.
Think Like A Librarian
This is a slightly modified version of Think Like a Librarian for a different school district I'm working with.
1 - Evaluating sources' credibility bb
This document discusses how to evaluate the reliability of sources. It explains that sources written by experts are generally more reliable than sources like Wikipedia where authors may lack thorough knowledge. Additionally, it notes that anyone can post information online so readers must think critically. The document provides examples of secondary sources that are often reliable if evaluated carefully, such as books, newspapers, and peer-reviewed research. It outlines criteria for assessing sources' usefulness, credibility, and potential for bias.
Website Evaluation
How to evaluate websites and characteristics of good website design. Used for lecturing undergrad students in Introduction to Internet and World Wide Web.
Eval websites
The document introduces the CRAAP test, which is a list of questions to help evaluate information found during searches. The CRAAP test criteria includes currency, relevance, authority, accuracy, and purpose. Different criteria may be more important depending on the situation or need. The document then lists questions for each criteria to help determine the quality and reliability of information.
Research Presentation
The document provides information on evaluating sources found on the internet. It discusses how Wikipedia may not be a reliable academic source due to lack of editorial oversight. It also discusses how to determine the authority, objectivity, currency and coverage of a website to evaluate if it is a good source. The document provides examples of citation styles and discusses avoiding plagiarism by properly citing sources.
WordCamp Miami 2015: Using Expertise, Authority and Trust in Your Content to ...
This document discusses how to boost search engine ranking by establishing expertise, authority, and trust (E.A.T.) in website content. It recommends deciding on areas of expertise to focus content, developing high-quality, relevant material, and linking to other authoritative sources. Authority comes from external links and citations as well as a site's reputation. Trust is built through transparency, citations, credentials, and truthful information. Higher standards apply to content impacting users' well-being. Clean, organized content demonstrating verifiable expertise raises E.A.T.
Web site evaluation
There are several criteria for evaluating websites, including authority, currency, accuracy, purpose, ease of use, and coverage. Websites should clearly indicate who authored the content and when it was last updated. The purpose of the site should also be apparent. Good websites are easy to navigate, have accurate and up-to-date information, and provide an unbiased viewpoint on their topic.
Reliable Websites
The document provides tips for evaluating the reliability of websites. It suggests asking questions about the authority, objectivity, authenticity, and timeliness of the information. Additional factors to consider include advertisements, publishing dates, citing sources, and the URL domain name. The document also discusses Boolean search operators that can be used to broaden or narrow search results. Sources are provided for further reading on basic and advanced search techniques and evaluating internet resources.
EvaluatingWebResources
This document discusses searching the web and evaluating web resources. It explains the differences between major search engines like Google and meta search engines like DogPile. It provides tips for effective searching using operators like "+" and quotation marks. The document also reviews how to analyze URLs and file structures to evaluate the authenticity of web sources. It identifies types of web resources to approach critically like vanity publishing and advertising sites.
Google and beyond_2009_spring
This document provides an overview of effective search strategies using Google and other search engines. It discusses how Google works by crawling web pages to build its database. When searching Google, it's important to be specific, use academic terms, and specify exact phrases. The document also discusses limiting searches by file type, website, or other parameters. It recommends evaluating the reliability and credibility of websites by examining the domain, author credentials, currency of information, sources cited, and potential biases.
What's hot (14)
WordCamp Miami 2015: Using Expertise, Authority and Trust in Your Content to ...
WordCamp Miami 2015: Using Expertise, Authority and Trust in Your Content to ...
Viewers also liked
Designing activities for online learning
This document discusses designing activities for online learning. It outlines five models of learning design: teaching approaches, experiential learning cycle, 5 stages model, and supporting online interaction. The experiential learning cycle places student activities at the core and forms a cycle of concrete experience, reflective observation, abstract conceptualization, and active experimentation. Technology can support each stage, through simulations, videos, discussion boards, podcasts, and student-created artifacts. When designing activities, instructors should consider student preferences, demand for technology, and supporting reflection, conceptualization, and experimentation.
5 criteria evaluating websites
This document outlines 5 criteria for evaluating websites: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It defines each criteria and provides questions to consider and signs to look for to determine if a website meets each criteria. For example, for accuracy it suggests checking who wrote the content and their qualifications, for authority it suggests evaluating who published the content and their credentials, and for currency it suggests determining when the content was created and last updated and if links are broken. Overall, the document provides a framework and questions to systematically evaluate the reliability of information on a website.
Plagiarism Data Driven Instruction
This document discusses plagiarism and proper citation of sources. It defines plagiarism as using another person's work without giving them credit. It also notes that ideas influenced by another work must be cited even if not directly quoted. The document then discusses types of plagiarism like copying work word for word or tweaking sentences from multiple sources. It provides statistics showing students who cited sources received higher grades than those who did not properly cite. The school policy considers plagiarism a serious matter that can result in penalties or course failure for repeated offenses.
Searching the Web
This document provides tips and strategies for effective web searching. It discusses different types of search tools like search engines, metasearch engines, and library portals. It outlines best practices for developing search strategies, evaluating results, and identifying misinformation online. Key evaluation criteria for assessing the accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage of websites are also presented.
Difference between web 1.0 and 2.0
Web 1.0 involved large equipment controlled by media institutions to create and distribute content on a one-way basis according to scheduled programming. Web 2.0 allows individuals to create and share content using affordable devices and distribute it through websites for user-generated content. It enables more interactivity as people contribute freely to help others and develop new ideas through conversations. However, the information on websites may not always be reliable.
Searching the Web of Data (Tutorial)
These are slides of a tutorial at ECIR by Gerard de Melo and Katja Hose.
Search is currently undergoing a major paradigm shift away from the traditional document-centric “10 blue links” towards more explicit and actionable information. Recent advances in this area are Google’s Knowledge Graph, Virtual Personal Assistants such as Siri and Google Now, as well as the now ubiquitous entity-oriented vertical search results for places, products, etc. Apart from novel query understanding methods, these developments are largely driven by structured data that is blended into the Web Search experience. We discuss efficient indexing and query processing techniques to work with large amounts of structured data. Finally, we present query interpretation and understanding methods to map user queries to these structured data sources.
5 Criteria for Evaluating Web Sites
The document outlines 5 criteria for evaluating websites: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It defines each criteria, such as checking an author's credentials under authority and determining if information is outdated under currency. The overall summary is to carefully examine websites based on these 5 criteria to determine their reliability and how well they meet the needs of the user.
Web 1.0 and Web 2.0
The document discusses the evolution of the web from Web 1.0 to Web 2.0. Web 1.0 focused on commerce, while Web 2.0 emphasizes user participation through tools that allow users to tag, blog, comment and modify content. Key principles of Web 2.0 include harnessing collective intelligence by allowing users to contribute value and providing services rather than products. Web 2.0 provides benefits like reduced costs, increased loyalty, and better search engine optimization through its distributed nature.
APA STYLE
This document provides guidelines for citing sources using APA style, including in-text citations and reference list entries. It explains that APA style uses a name-year system of referencing, requiring an in-text citation and a full reference list entry. Examples are given for various types of in-text citations (one author, two authors, group authors, no author, etc.) and reference list entries (books, articles, websites, unpublished sources, etc.).
Effective web search techniques
The document discusses techniques for formulating effective search queries to find relevant information online. It recommends identifying key words from the search topic, removing unnecessary words, and using Boolean operators, quotation marks, and other tools to narrow results. Formulating the right search query involves scaling the topic down to operative terms and parsing phrases. The document also explains how to search the "deep web" by using context terms and site-specific searches.
Searching of Web and Electronic Resources
This document provides an overview of tools and techniques for searching the web and other online resources. It discusses the evolution of the internet from 1945 to present day. It then covers various types of search tools including search engines, meta search engines, directories, digital libraries, and scholarly communication directories. Finally, it outlines strategies for effective searching such as defining problems, selecting keywords, determining scope, and refining searches.
Effective Internet Searching
The document provides an overview of how to effectively search the internet. It discusses what the internet is, how it works, and the history and terminology associated with searching online. It then gives guidelines for developing successful search strategies, such as being specific, using keywords and phrases, trying different search engines and refining searches based on results. It emphasizes evaluating websites for credibility by examining aspects like the domain, author, date updated and external links.
QuickSheet APA 6th Ed - The Basic Mechanics
This document provides an overview of the basic formatting guidelines for papers written in APA 6th edition style. It lists the requirements for page size, margins, line spacing, font type and size, alignment, paragraph indentation, page headers, headings, spacing after punctuation, abstract formatting, optimal paper length, writing style, and use of third-person active voice. The document serves as a quick reference for the core structural and stylistic elements for papers following APA publication manual guidelines.
Lesson 16 The internet and the education
The document discusses how the Internet has become an important part of education. It notes that the Internet has no central ownership or services and uses standardized TCP/IP protocols to transmit data. It allows vast amounts of old and new information to be accessed through browsing programs. The number of Internet users is growing rapidly as more people and organizations require its services. The future of the Internet seems limitless as it continues to spawn new websites and demand for business, science, and other services. Education software is also becoming more sophisticated and appealing. Schools are now able to take advantage of Internet access to connect to resources like libraries and museums from their classrooms.
Search engines powerpoint
A basic knowledge of search engines and metasearch engines is needed to be a successful internet searcher.
Web 1.0 2.0-3.0-4.0 Overview
Web 1.0 was the first generation of the world wide web and allowed for one-way broadcasting of information from website owners. Web 2.0 focused on enabling collaboration and information sharing between users online through things like social media platforms and wikis. Web 3.0 extended on these social aspects and aimed to provide location-aware and moment-relevant experiences across multiple devices. Web 4.0, still in development, envisions a symbiotic relationship between humans and machines through technologies like ambient intelligence and mind-controlled interfaces. Each generation brought new interactive capabilities to the internet and how people engage with online information.
Search engine
A search engine uses automated software programs called spiders that crawl the web to index pages and create a searchable database. When a user searches for keywords, the search engine software returns relevant results from the index. There are three main types of search engines - directories that are compiled by humans, hybrid engines that combine human and automated results, and meta search engines that search multiple other engines at once. Each search engine indexes pages differently and has a unique algorithm to determine search results.
Top 10 internet uses in teaching and learning
The document outlines 10 top internet uses for teaching and learning: 1) Research using tools like Google Scholar and INFOMINE, 2) Blogging to share written thoughts, 3) Communicating between teachers, students, and parents, 4) Networking for students to interact and share ideas, 5) Accessing electronic books, 6) Listening to podcasts which are downloadable audio or video files, 7) Registering for classes online, 8) Taking online classes, 9) Submitting assignments via the internet, and 10) Posting and viewing grades online.
What Is Plagiarism
The document defines plagiarism as presenting others' words, ideas, images or creative works as one's own without proper citation or credit. It cites a study that found over 70% of students admitted to some form of cheating or plagiarism. The types of plagiarism are discussed as intentional copying or buying of works, and unintentional through careless paraphrasing or excessive quoting without using one's own voice. Consequences can include failing grades, suspension or loss of reputation and future opportunities. Proper citation and use of sources is encouraged to avoid plagiarism.
The Internet and Education
The document discusses the importance of the Internet for education. It defines the Internet as the largest and far-flung system connecting over 25,000 networks worldwide. The Internet has been one of the most important developments in human communication since call waiting. It allows for easy access to information through browsing and has the potential to positively transform education, organization, and participation in society.
Viewers also liked (20)
Similar to Evaluating Websites
Web Site Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It discusses how the internet has changed research and that not all online information is accurate. It then outlines five criteria for evaluating websites: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. The document explains each of these criteria in detail and provides examples to illustrate how to apply them when assessing the reliability of information on a given website. The overall message is that students need to carefully evaluate websites using these standards to determine their value for research.
Web site evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It begins by explaining that unlike printed materials, websites are not edited and fact checked, so not all information online is useful or accurate. It then outlines criteria to consider when evaluating websites, including authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Specific questions are provided for each criteria. The document emphasizes that no single criteria determines a website's value and that the criteria should be considered together. Students are assigned an exercise to practice evaluating websites using the outlined criteria.
Web Site Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research. It discusses that unlike printed materials, websites are not edited and information online is not always accurate. It then outlines criteria to evaluate websites, including authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. The document explains each criterion in detail and provides examples and questions to consider for each one. The overall message is that students should carefully analyze websites using these criteria before determining their value for research.
Itc536 web evalpp
The document provides criteria for evaluating websites, including authority, purpose, currency, accuracy, and coverage. For authority, it is important to evaluate the author's credentials and expertise. Purpose determines whether the site aims to inform, promote, or influence. Currency checks if the information is up-to-date by looking at dates. Accuracy has no guarantees as websites rarely have editors, so citations are important. Coverage determines what topics are included and how comprehensive the information is.
Website Evaluation
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It outlines five criteria to consider: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Authority refers to the credentials of the author/sponsor. Accuracy checks for factual errors or inconsistencies. Objectivity considers the balance/bias of perspectives presented. Currency evaluates how recently the site was updated. Coverage assesses the depth/breadth of information provided. Students are advised to apply these criteria to critically analyze a website's value before using it for research. Considering the criteria together provides a holistic evaluation of a website's reliability and usefulness.
Website Evaluation Tutorial
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It outlines five criteria to consider: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. Authority refers to the credentials of the author/sponsor. Accuracy checks for factual errors or inconsistencies. Objectivity considers the balance/bias of perspectives presented. Currency means how recently information/links were updated. Coverage assesses the depth/breadth of information provided. Students are advised to apply these criteria to critically analyze a website's value before using it for research. Librarians can also assist with difficult-to-evaluate sites.
Evaluating websites
This document provides guidance on evaluating online information sources and websites. It discusses evaluating electronic information for accuracy, relevance, appropriateness, comprehensiveness, and bias. It also discusses evaluating new information resources and technological innovations based on their appropriateness for specific tasks. Key factors for evaluating websites discussed include considering who authored the site, what the purpose and potential biases are, when it was created and last updated, where the information comes from, and why the information would be useful. A checklist of "5 W" questions is provided to systematically evaluate websites.
Evaluating Web Sources For Research
This document provides guidance for evaluating web sources for research by beginning MBA students. It outlines criteria for evaluating sources, including authority, accuracy, content, currency, and objectivity. For each criterion, it poses questions to consider and provides techniques for evaluating the source based on that criterion, such as looking for information about authors and publishers to judge authority, consulting additional sources to verify claims and check for errors when evaluating accuracy, and examining links and references for signs of bias or an agenda when analyzing objectivity. The document encourages using these criteria and techniques to make sense of excessive online information and develop critical thinking skills.
Evaluating websites
The document outlines four criteria for evaluating information found on websites: authorship, currency, accuracy, and purpose. It discusses factors to consider for each criterion, such as domain name extensions that indicate author type, when the site was last updated, whether sources are cited, and the site's stated purpose. The document concludes by summarizing the four evaluation criteria and providing an example website to practice evaluating.
Criteria for Evaluating Webpages
The document outlines five criteria for evaluating the quality of web pages: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It defines each criterion and provides examples of factors to consider to evaluate a page's performance in each area. For a page to be of high quality, it should list the author and allow contact, provide author credentials and be from a reputable domain, present information objectively with limited advertising, be up-to-date with current content and links, and allow full access to content without fees or software requirements. Following these criteria can help identify pages that provide valuable research information.
Evaluating Internet Sources
This document provides guidance on how to evaluate the credibility and reliability of information found online. It outlines several steps and criteria to consider when assessing a website or web page, including analyzing the domain name and server information to determine the publisher; researching the author's qualifications and potential biases; evaluating the currency and documentation of the information; determining if multiple viewpoints are presented; and assessing the overall purpose and usefulness of the site. The goal is to develop skills for critically examining online information and determining what can validly be proven or concluded based on the source.
Website Evaluation 2009
The document discusses five criteria for evaluating websites: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It poses questions to help assess each criteria, such as identifying the author and organization, checking for cited sources, looking for evidence of bias, verifying dates, and determining the depth of information covered. Applying these evaluation criteria can help determine the usefulness and reliability of the information on a website.
Website Evaluation
The document discusses five criteria for evaluating websites: authority, accuracy, objectivity, currency, and coverage. It poses questions to help assess each criteria, such as identifying the author and organization, checking for cited sources, looking for evidence of bias, verifying dates, and determining the depth of information covered. Applying these criteria can help determine the usefulness and reliability of the information on a website.
W13 libr250 evaluating and citing websites1
This document provides guidance on evaluating websites for research purposes. It discusses evaluating websites based on several criteria: authority or author; objectivity and potential for bias; timeliness of information; relevance to research topic; and practice evaluating sample websites using these criteria. The document also reviews proper citation of online sources using APA style, including required elements like author, date, title, URL, and retrieval date when needed. Resources for citing online sources according to APA style are provided.
Website Evaluation Lesson
A website evaluation lesson for an elementary classroom, prepared for an Instructional Technology university course.
Can you trust_the_web
The document discusses how to evaluate information found on the web through careful analysis. It provides four key steps: 1) examine the URL and publisher to determine potential biases, 2) investigate the author's credentials and expertise on the topic, 3) check the date to ensure currency, and 4) analyze the purpose and potential biases in presentation of the information. The document stresses the importance of skepticism when evaluating online sources, as there are no standards regulating information accuracy on the web like in published sources.
Criteria
This document provides criteria for evaluating the quality and reliability of information found on websites. It discusses 6 key criteria: accuracy, authority, objectivity, currency, coverage, and clarity. For each criterion, the document explains why it is important and provides examples of both reliable and unreliable websites to illustrate how to apply each criterion when assessing websites. The overall message is that anyone can publish anything on the internet, so it is important to carefully evaluate websites using established criteria before trusting the information they contain.
Evaluating Sources
Short presentation on evaluating web sources created for a job interview at George Mason University. George Mason University is not responsible for any of the content of this presentation.
Carol jones evaluating web sites
There are five main criteria for evaluating whether a website is suitable for research: relevancy, authority, objectivity, currency, and suitability. A researcher should consider whether the information is on-topic, who authored it and their credentials, whether it is fact-based or opinionated, how up-to-date it is, and whether it is at an appropriate level for the intended audience and purpose. Researchers should critically evaluate websites according to these standards and determine if higher-quality sources exist before citing a website in an academic paper.
Carol jones evaluating web sites
There are five main criteria for evaluating whether a website is suitable for research: relevancy, authority, objectivity, currency, and suitability. A researcher should consider whether the information is on-topic, who authored it and their credentials, whether it is fact-based or opinionated, how up-to-date it is, and whether it is at an appropriate level for the intended audience and purpose. Researchers should critically evaluate websites using these standards and determine if higher-quality sources exist before citing a website in academic work.
Similar to Evaluating Websites (20)
Recently uploaded
做澳洲澳大利亚国立大学毕业证荣誉学位证书原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【澳洲澳大利亚国立大学毕业证荣誉学位证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
The Impact of Generative AI and 4th Industrial Revolution
This infographic explores the transformative power of Generative AI, a key driver of the 4th Industrial Revolution. Discover how Generative AI is revolutionizing industries, accelerating innovation, and shaping the future of work.
Fabular Frames and the Four Ratio Problem
Digital, interactive art showing the struggle of a society in providing for its present population while also saving planetary resources for future generations. Spread across several frames, the art is actually the rendering of real and speculative data. The stereographic projections change shape in response to prompts and provocations. Visitors interact with the model through speculative statements about how to increase savings across communities, regions, ecosystems and environments. Their fabulations combined with random noise, i.e. factors beyond control, have a dramatic effect on the societal transition. Things get better. Things get worse. The aim is to give visitors a new grasp and feel of the ongoing struggles in democracies around the world.
Stunning art in the small multiples format brings out the spatiotemporal nature of societal transitions, against backdrop issues such as energy, housing, waste, farmland and forest. In each frame we see hopeful and frightful interplays between spending and saving. Problems emerge when one of the two parts of the existential anaglyph rapidly shrinks like Arctic ice, as factors cross thresholds. Ecological wealth and intergenerational equity areFour at stake. Not enough spending could mean economic stress, social unrest and political conflict. Not enough saving and there will be climate breakdown and ‘bankruptcy’. So where does speculative design start and the gambling and betting end? Behind each fabular frame is a four ratio problem. Each ratio reflects the level of sacrifice and self-restraint a society is willing to accept, against promises of prosperity and freedom. Some values seem to stabilise a frame while others cause collapse. Get the ratios right and we can have it all. Get them wrong and things get more desperate.
在线办理(UMASS毕业证书)马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校毕业证完成信一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(UMASS毕业证书)马萨诸塞大学阿默斯特分校毕业证》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck mari...
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck maria r mitchell.docx
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck maria r mitchell.docx
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck maria r mitchell.docx
RMIT University degree offer diploma Transcript
澳洲RMIT毕业证书制作RMIT假文凭定制Q微168899991做RMIT留信网教留服认证海牙认证改RMIT成绩单GPA做RMIT假学位证假文凭高仿毕业证申请墨尔本皇家理工大学RMIT University degree offer diploma Transcript
Optimizing Net Interest Margin (NIM) in the Financial Sector (With Examples).pdf
NIM is calculated as the difference between interest income earned and interest expenses paid, divided by interest-earning assets.
Importance: NIM serves as a critical measure of a financial institution's profitability and operational efficiency. It reflects how effectively the institution is utilizing its interest-earning assets to generate income while managing interest costs.
在线办理(TAMU毕业证书)美国德州农工大学毕业证PDF成绩单一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(TAMU毕业证书)美国德州农工大学毕业证PDF成绩单》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
Machine Learning in Business - A power point presentation.pptx
Power point presentation on machine learning.
South Dakota State University degree offer diploma Transcript
办理美国SDSU毕业证书制作南达科他州立大学假文凭定制Q微168899991做SDSU留信网教留服认证海牙认证改SDSU成绩单GPA做SDSU假学位证假文凭高仿毕业证GRE代考如何申请南达科他州立大学South Dakota State University degree offer diploma Transcript
Governor Olli Rehn: Inflation down and recovery supported by interest rate cu...
Governor Olli Rehn
Bank of Finland
Press conference on the outlook for the Finnish economy
Helsinki, 11 June 2024
Discover the Future of Dogecoin with Our Comprehensive Guidance
Learn in-depth about Dogecoin's trajectory and stay informed with 36crypto's essential and up-to-date information about the crypto space.
Our presentation delves into Dogecoin's potential future, exploring whether it's destined to skyrocket to the moon or face a downward spiral. In addition, it highlights invaluable insights. Don't miss out on this opportunity to enhance your crypto understanding!
https://36crypto.com/the-future-of-dogecoin-how-high-can-this-cryptocurrency-reach/
一比一原版(RMIT毕业证)皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证如何办理
RMIT硕士学位证成绩单【微信95270640】《皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证书》《QQ微信95270640》学位证书电子版：在线制作皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证成绩单GPA修改（制作RMIT毕业证成绩单RMIT文凭证书样本）、皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证书与成绩单样本图片、《RMIT学历证书学位证书》、皇家墨尔本理工大学毕业证案例毕业证书制作軟體、在线制作加拿大硕士学历证书真实可查.
【本科硕士】皇家墨尔本理工大学皇家墨尔本理工大学本科学位证成绩单（GPA修改）；学历认证（教育部认证）；大学Offer录取通知书留信认证使馆认证；雅思语言证书等高仿类证书。
办理流程：
1客户提供办理皇家墨尔本理工大学皇家墨尔本理工大学本科学位证成绩单信息：姓名生日专业学位毕业时间等（如信息不确定可以咨询顾问：我们有专业老师帮你查询）；
2开始安排制作毕业证成绩单电子图；
3毕业证成绩单电子版做好以后发送给您确认；
4毕业证成绩单电子版您确认信息无误之后安排制作成品；
5成品做好拍照或者视频给您确认；
6快递给客户（国内顺丰国外DHLUPS等快读邮寄）
真实网上可查的证明材料
1教育部学历学位认证留服官网真实存档可查永久存档。
2留学回国人员证明（使馆认证）使馆网站真实存档可查。
我们对海外大学及学院的毕业证成绩单所使用的材料尺寸大小防伪结构（包括：皇家墨尔本理工大学皇家墨尔本理工大学本科学位证成绩单隐形水印阴影底纹钢印LOGO烫金烫银LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕激光镭射紫外荧光温感复印防伪）都有原版本文凭对照。质量得到了广大海外客户群体的认可同时和海外学校留学中介做到与时俱进及时掌握各大院校的（毕业证成绩单资格证结业证录取通知书在读证明等相关材料）的版本更新信息能够在第一时间掌握最新的海外学历文凭的样版尺寸大小纸张材质防伪技术等等并在第一时间收集到原版实物以求达到客户的需求。
本公司还可以按照客户原版印刷制作且能够达到客户理想的要求。有需要办理证件的客户请联系我们在线客服中心微信：95270640 或咨询在线父亲的家很狭小除了一张单人床和一张小方桌几乎没有多余的空间山娃一下子就联想起学校的男小便处山娃很想笑却怎么也笑不出来山娃很迷惑父亲的家除了一扇小铁门连窗户也没有墓穴一般阴森森有些骇人父亲的城也便成了山娃的城父亲的家也便成了山娃的家父亲让山娃呆在屋里做作业看电视最多只能在门口透透气不能跟陌生人搭腔更不能乱跑一怕迷路二怕拐子拐人山娃很惊惧去年村里的田鸡就因为跟父亲进城一不小心被人拐跑了至今不见踪影害不
Accounting Information Systems (AIS).pptx
An accounting information system (AIS) refers to tools and systems designed for the collection and display of accounting information so accountants and executives can make informed decisions.
快速制作美国迈阿密大学牛津分校毕业证文凭证书英文原版一模一样
原版一模一样【微信：741003700 】【美国迈阿密大学牛津分校毕业证文凭证书】【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原海外各大学 Bachelor Diploma degree, Master Degree Diploma
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
University of North Carolina at Charlotte degree offer diploma Transcript
办理美国UNCC毕业证书制作北卡大学夏洛特分校假文凭定制Q微168899991做UNCC留信网教留服认证海牙认证改UNCC成绩单GPA做UNCC假学位证假文凭高仿毕业证GRE代考如何申请北卡罗莱纳大学夏洛特分校University of North Carolina at Charlotte degree offer diploma Transcript
在线办理(GU毕业证书)美国贡萨加大学毕业证学历证书一模一样
学校原件一模一样【微信：741003700 】《(GU毕业证书)美国贡萨加大学毕业证学历证书》【微信：741003700 】学位证，留信认证（真实可查，永久存档）原件一模一样纸张工艺/offer、雅思、外壳等材料/诚信可靠,可直接看成品样本，帮您解决无法毕业带来的各种难题！外壳，原版制作，诚信可靠，可直接看成品样本。行业标杆！精益求精，诚心合作，真诚制作！多年品质 ,按需精细制作，24小时接单,全套进口原装设备。十五年致力于帮助留学生解决难题，包您满意。
本公司拥有海外各大学样板无数，能完美还原。
1:1完美还原海外各大学毕业材料上的工艺：水印，阴影底纹，钢印LOGO烫金烫银，LOGO烫金烫银复合重叠。文字图案浮雕、激光镭射、紫外荧光、温感、复印防伪等防伪工艺。材料咨询办理、认证咨询办理请加学历顾问Q/微741003700
【主营项目】
一.毕业证【q微741003700】成绩单、使馆认证、教育部认证、雅思托福成绩单、学生卡等！
二.真实使馆公证(即留学回国人员证明,不成功不收费)
三.真实教育部学历学位认证（教育部存档！教育部留服网站永久可查）
四.办理各国各大学文凭(一对一专业服务,可全程监控跟踪进度)
如果您处于以下几种情况：
◇在校期间，因各种原因未能顺利毕业……拿不到官方毕业证【q/微741003700】
◇面对父母的压力，希望尽快拿到；
◇不清楚认证流程以及材料该如何准备；
◇回国时间很长，忘记办理；
◇回国马上就要找工作，办给用人单位看；
◇企事业单位必须要求办理的
◇需要报考公务员、购买免税车、落转户口
◇申请留学生创业基金
留信网认证的作用:
1:该专业认证可证明留学生真实身份
2:同时对留学生所学专业登记给予评定
3:国家专业人才认证中心颁发入库证书
4:这个认证书并且可以归档倒地方
5:凡事获得留信网入网的信息将会逐步更新到个人身份内，将在公安局网内查询个人身份证信息后，同步读取人才网入库信息
6:个人职称评审加20分
7:个人信誉贷款加10分
8:在国家人才网主办的国家网络招聘大会中纳入资料，供国家高端企业选择人才
OAT_RI_Ep20 WeighingTheRisks_May24_Trade Wars.pptx
How will new technology fields affect economic trade?
Recently uploaded (20)
The Impact of Generative AI and 4th Industrial Revolution
The Impact of Generative AI and 4th Industrial Revolution
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck mari...
TEST BANK Principles of cost accounting 17th edition edward j vanderbeck mari...
Optimizing Net Interest Margin (NIM) in the Financial Sector (With Examples).pdf
Optimizing Net Interest Margin (NIM) in the Financial Sector (With Examples).pdf
Upanishads summary with explanations of each upnishad
Upanishads summary with explanations of each upnishad
Machine Learning in Business - A power point presentation.pptx
Machine Learning in Business - A power point presentation.pptx
South Dakota State University degree offer diploma Transcript
South Dakota State University degree offer diploma Transcript
Governor Olli Rehn: Inflation down and recovery supported by interest rate cu...
Governor Olli Rehn: Inflation down and recovery supported by interest rate cu...
Discover the Future of Dogecoin with Our Comprehensive Guidance
Discover the Future of Dogecoin with Our Comprehensive Guidance
University of North Carolina at Charlotte degree offer diploma Transcript
University of North Carolina at Charlotte degree offer diploma Transcript
OAT_RI_Ep20 WeighingTheRisks_May24_Trade Wars.pptx
OAT_RI_Ep20 WeighingTheRisks_May24_Trade Wars.pptx
Evaluating Websites
- 1. Session 4 Evaluating Web Sites
- 11. Get Ready! It's Time For The Post-Test!