SlideShare a Scribd company logo
Wind Farm Study – EUREC 2016
Carlos E. Silva
NTUA Athens 2016
Wind Measurements Data Analysis
Wind Measurement Data Analysis
1 year wind data (10
minutes averaged wind
velocity)
Hub height
Wind Speed
Wind direction
Site wind provided by a R&D Energy Center.
Wind Measurement Data Analysis
Avg. Probability and Wind Speed Roses.
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
N
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
SSW
SW
WS
W
W
WN
W
NW
NN
W
Avg. Probability
-
2,0
4,0
6,0
8,0
N
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
SSW
SW
WSW
W
WNW
NW
NNW
Avg. Wind Speed
• WNW - S = 80 % from Operational Time!
• NW – WNW = Strongest AWS (7.2 m/s)
• WSW – SSW = Highest Operational Demand! (6.8 m/s)
Wind Rose Parameters
No. Wind Segments 16
Total angle [°] 360
Angle/direction [°] 22,5
First Segment Angle [°] 348,75
Uave [m/s] 6,41
Std.Dev 3,35
Wind Measurement Data Analysis
Wind Rose
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
N
NNE
NE
ENE
E
ESE
SE
SSE
S
SSW
SW
WSW
W
WNW
NW
NNW
Wind Rose
0 to 4
4 to 8
8 to 12
12 to 16
16 to 20
20 to 24
24 to 28
28 to 32
-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
WindSpeed[m/s]
Month
Mean monthly wind speed variation
Wind Measurement Data Analysis
Mean monthly wind speed variation.
Month Uave [m/s]
January 7,33
February 7,52
March 6,18
April 5,40
May 6,58
June 6,51
July 6,99
August 8,23
September 5,38
October 6,13
November 6,39
December 4,23
Total
Uave 6,41
Wind Measurement Data Analysis
Turbulence Intensity
0
0,1
0,2
0,3
0,4
0,5
0,6
0,7
0,8
0,9
1
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
TurbulenceIntensity%
Hub Wind Speed (m/s)
Turbulence Intensity per Hub Wind Speed
 Determine the Wind Turbine Iref (A,B or C) using
IEC 61400-1 Ed.3 Wind Classification
Wind Measurement Data Analysis
Weibull Semi-Empirical, Least Square Fit method and Bins Probability
Bowden Semi-Empirical
Shape Factor K 2,02
Scale Factor C 7,23
Uave [m/s] 6,41
Least Square
Shape Factor K 1,85
Scale Factor C 7,52
Uave [m/s] 6,67
Semi Empirical
Least Square
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28
Probability%
Wind Speed m/s
Weibull Distribution Comparison
Bowden Semi-Empirical Probability per bins Least Square
Site Wind Turbine Selection
Site Wind Turbine Selection
2MW Wind Turbine R&D Benchmark
Test Turbine Selection
Vave [m/s] 6,4
Hub Height [m] 90
Diameter [m] 90
Vmax[m/s] 32
Reference cost for the test turbine (€/kW) 950
TEST TURBINE
DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS
Power (kW) 2000
Diameter (m) 90,0
Max Tip Speed (m/s) 80,0
Drive Train Efficiency 94,00%
Omega Rotor max (rad/s) 1,78
RPM Rotor max 16,98
Rated Rotor Torque (kNm) 1197
x = 1,50
COMPONENTS MASS & COST
MASS (kg) COST (euro)
Three Blades 19.677 255.801
Gearbox 10.308 123.690
Generator 5.550 80.478
Cost of blades, Gearbox, Generator 459.969
Rest cost of drive train (nacelle, power electronics, pitch etc)459.969
Subtotal drive train 919.938
980.062
Total cost of wind turbine 1.900.000
Share of BL, GB, Gen in the total WT cost 24,2%
Cost of the hub
 90 m diameter as a
reference turbine!
 Class III Wind Turbine!
ave refV 0.2V
Site Wind Turbine Selection and Power Curves
What the competition has available for IEC III 2 MW Wind Turbines?
Project Wind Data
Vave [m/s] 6,41
C 7,23
Std.Dev 3,4
K 2,021
Site Wind Turbine Selection
2MW Wind Turbine R&D Benchmark
 90 m diameter as a reference turbine.
 + 80 and 100m diameters for industry
competition Go-To-Market!
3 Project testing diameters: 80, 90 and 100 m
IEC Class III (6 - 7.5 m/s)
80 m
90 m
100 m
Site Wind Turbine Selection
NTUA – 2 MW PLATFORM ASSORTMENT
Site Wind Turbine Selection
LCOE per 2 MW Product Range Diameters
 Lowest LCOE !
 Highest Annual Energy Output !
 39,2 % Capacity Factor!
 +14 % Wind Turbine Cost vs. 90m diameter!
Selection of our IEC III- NTUA/2MW 100 m diameter & tower height wind turbine:
WIN – WIN
SOLUTION!!!!!
80 90 100 100 Vs. 80 100 Vs. 90
Avg. Wind Speed [m/s] 6,41 6,41 6,41
Avg. Power Output [kW] 592 697 783 32% 12%
Avg. Power Output per RA[kW/m^2] 0,03 0,03 0,02 -15% -9%
Annual Energy Output [GWh] 4,93 5,80 6,52 32% 12%
Capacity Factor (%) 29,6% 34,8% 39,2% 32% 12%
LCOE [€/kWh] 0,064 0,060 0,058 -9% -3%
LCOE [€/MWh] 63,86 59,56 57,93 -9% -3%
Wind Turbine Cost [€] 1.638.360 1.900.000 2.174.272 33% 14%
Wind Turbine Project Indicators
Wind Turbine Diameters 100 m diameter performace
2 MW Wind Turbines Range
Site Wind Turbine Selection
LCOE per Technology
Site Wind Turbine Selection
2 MW Vs. 3 MW Platform
Site Wind Turbine Selection
3 MW Platform LCOE
X More Expensive LCOE vs 2 MW!
 18% Higher Annual Energy Output vs. 2MW platform!
X 30,7 % Capacity Factor!
 +17 % Wind Turbine Cost vs. 2 MW platform!
What happens If we upscale the wind turbine to a 3 MW platform!
2 MW 3 MW Difference
100 100 100 Vs. 80
Avg. Wind Speed [m/s] 6,41 6,41
Avg. Power Output [kW] 783 922 18%
Avg. Power Output per RA[kW/m^2] 0,02 0,03 18%
Annual Energy Output [GWh] 6,52 7,67 18%
Capacity Factor (%) 39,2% 30,7% -22%
LCOE [€/kWh] 0,058 0,063 9%
LCOE [€/MWh] 57,93 62,85 9%
Wind Turbine Cost [€] 2.174.272 2.543.076 17%
Wind Turbine Project Indicators
100 m diameter 2MW vs. 3MW Platform
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW
Wind Turbine Performance
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Pitch Regulation and Variable Speed Design
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Pitch Angle & Rotor Speed Variation per Wind Velocity
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Thrust per wind speed
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Power coefficient – Tip speed ratio
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Thrust coefficient – Tip speed ratio
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Variable Speed Power Output & Thrust
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Rotor Aerodynamics
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Angle of Attack per blade lenght
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Axian Induction Factor per blade lenght
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Tangential Induction Factor per blade lenght
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Normal Force per blade lenght
IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
Tangential Force per blade lenght
Wind Penetration Limits
for a non-interconnected power system
Wind Penetration Limits
What is Wind Curltailment?
It means that wind was available, but the grid operator did not allow the wind farm to put
power on the grid (not dispatched).
There are 2 kinds of dispatching rules:
Physical Imperatives to keep the grid
in balance:
• Matching load
• Not over-loading transmission lines
• Taking into account how quickly
various plants can come on-line.
Economics and other non-physical
issues:
• Dispatching the least expensive
plants first
• Giving renewables a favored
position in the line-up.
Wind Penetration Limits
Off-Grid System Annual Electricity Demand
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
1 400 799 1198 1597 1996 2395 2794 3193 3592 3991 4390 4789 5188 5587 5986 6385 6784 7183 7582 7981 8380
Demand(MW)
Time (hr)
Power Demand
Demand characteristics
Maximum power demand 34,1 MW
Minimum power demand 6,7 MW
Annual electricity demand 118,04 GWh
Annual mean load 13,5 MW
Maximum Power Demand
Annual Mean Load
Wind Penetration Limits
Simplified Diagram
6.4 m/S
76%
Wind Penetration Limits
Simplified Diagram
Total Load Demand (MWh) 118.036 118.036 118.036
Average Load (MW) 13,5 13,5 13,5
Average Wind Speed (m/s) 6,4 6,4 6,4
Power Rated per Wind Turbine (MW) 2 2 2
Number of Wind Turbines 6 5 4
Total Wind Turbine Capacity (MW) 12 10 8
Wind Installed Capacity (%) 89% 74% 59%
Capacity Factor (%) 39,2% 39,2% 39,2%
Absorbed by the grid (%) 68% 76% 86%
Rejected by the grid (%) 32,0% 24,0% 14,0%
Total Wind Energy Production (MWh) 39.110 32.592 26.073
Total Wind Energy Absorbed by the grid (MWh) 26.595 24.770 22.423
Real Capacity Factor (%) 25% 28% 32%
Wind Supply (%) 23% 21% 19%
Simplified Diagram Tables
The right balance across installed wind capacity and the 20% wind
energy annual energy supply is found at 10 MW (5 turbines),
providing:
• 24% curtailment
• 28% capacity factor
• 21% wind energy annual electricity supply
Wind Penetration Limits
Probabilistic Approach
No. Turbines Rated Capacity (MW)
Data 5 2
Wind Capacity 10 MW
Wind capacity as percentage of the average load 74,2%
Number of diesel units 10
Rated power of diesel unit 3,5 MW
Diesel units technical minimum 40%
Diesel Total Capacity 35 MW
Diesel technical minimum capacity 14 MW
Wind and Diesel Capacity
Wind energy which could be produced 33645 MWh
Wind Absorbed + Rejected 34,04 GWh
Wind energy absorbed by the grid 23,5 GWh
Wind energy rejected 10,5 GWh
Percentage of rejected wind energy 30,8%
Conventional energy produced 94,49 MWh
Conv+Wind absorbed 118,04 MWh
Capacity factor available 38,41%
Capacity factor real 26,88%
% wind supply 20%
Results
Wind Penetration Limits
Maximum instantaneous wind supply "δ" 38%
With a 38% wind penetration:
• We only require 5 turbines
with a total of 10 MW
installed wind capacity.
• 74,2 % from the average
load.
The wind curtailment is 30,8
% and the capacity factor is
26,88 %.
Capacity Credit
For a non-interconnected power system
Capacity Credit
Capacity Credit Calculation
Wind Installed Capacity (MW) 10,0
LOLE System before wind installations 0,053%
LOLE System after wind installations 0,053%
ELCC 1,5
CC 15%
Capacity Credit Calculation
Capacity credit is the level of conventional generation that can be replaced with wind
generation. To perform such an analysis, it is important to define the way in which one type of
resource can be substituted for another.
Number of units 10
Mean rated power of each unit 3,5 MW
Total conventional capacity 35 MW
Propability of each unit to be available 95%
Propability of each unit not to be available 5%
CONVENTIONAL CAPACITY DATA
For our case, we measured the system reliability with the loss-of-load expectation (LOLE),
which is an indication of the statistically expected number of times within a given time period
that the system could not provide the demand load. When the given level of wind-generating
capacity can be substituted for conventional capacity, holding the reliability level constant, we
obtained the measure of wind plant capacity credit with 15%
Wake Effect Losses
5 turbines 100m/2MW - Flat Terrain
Wake Effect Losses
Main Frecuency wind speed and wind sectors
As defined by the Wind Rose, our site
2 main operational wind speeds are
coming from 3 main wind direction
sectors: SSW, WSW and WNW
(202.5, 247.5 and 292.5 deg). This is a
decision factor to position our
turbines and minimize the Wake
Effect Losses.
Wake Effect Losses
Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 1
6.195
5.717
7,71%
Wind Farm Losses
Wind Energy Production [MWh]
Wind Energy Production with Wake Effect [MWh]
Wake Losses
The first project proposal is arranged in order to take the biggest advantage of the SSW and
WSW wind rose directions, the 2 biggest main sectors.
Wake Effect Losses
Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 1
292,5 deg –
11,31%
frecuency
12,04 % losses
247,5 deg –
14,33%
frecuency
1,42 % losses
202,5 deg –
14,03%
frecuency
2,12 % losses
Wake Effect Losses
Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 2
6.195
5.792
6,51%
Wind Farm Losses
Wind Energy Production [MWh]
Wind Energy Production with Wake Effect [MWh]
Wake Losses
The aim from the second project proposal is to look for a wind turbine arrangement able to
reduce more drastically the losses generated by the 292,5 deg wind direction and the
separation of wind turbines to have an even cleaner wind segments at the 2 main wind
directions 247,5 and 202,5 deg.
Wake Effect Losses
Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 2
292,5 deg –
11,31%
frecuency
8,94 % losses
247,5 deg –
14,33%
frecuency
0,92 % losses
202,5 deg –
14,03%
frecuency
1,05 % losses
Wake Effect Losses
Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 3
6.195
5.819
6,07%
Wind Farm Losses
Wind Energy Production [MWh]
Wind Energy Production with Wake Effect [MWh]
Wake Losses
For the final proposal, witch is the project selection, the aim was to find the proper
separation across turbines from the wind direction 292,5 deg that wont harm negatively the
wind turbiness efficiency from the 247,5 and 202,5 deg wind sectors.
Wake Effect Losses
Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 3
292,5 deg –
11,31%
frecuency
7,55 % losses
247,5 deg –
14,33%
frecuency
0,50 % losses
202,5 deg –
14,03%
frecuency
0,48 % losses
Project Financial Evaluation
Project Financial Evaluation
Financial Assessment
NPV (thousand €) IRR % PBP (years)
1.569 7,85% 12
Wind Turbines Capacity (MW) 2
Wind Turbines 5
Wind Farm Capacity (MW) 10
Load factor 0,27
Total Investment Cost (€) 16.111.359
Wind Turbine Cost (€) 2.174.272
Other Cost (€/kW) 524
Operational cost (% Inv.Cost) 3,0%
Tax (%) 35%
Depreciation rate (%) 10%
Interest rate (%) 6%
Feed-inTariff (€/MWh) 99
Discount rate (%) 6%
Salvage value (% Inv.Cost) 20%
Rate to local authorities (% Income) 0%
Availability (%) 98%
Electricity Production (MWh) 23073
Wake Losses 6,07%
Electricity Production (MWh) 21.673
FINANCIAL PARAMETERS
Project Financial Evaluation
Sensitivity Analysis
Taxes NPV (thousand €) IRR % NPV % Change IIR % Change
20% 2.593 € 9% 36% 8%
25% 2.252 € 9% 18% 4%
30% 1.910 € 8% 0% 0%
35% 1.569 € 8% -18% -4%
40% 1.227 € 7% -36% -9%
Taxes Variation
Taxes Variation: the analysis
was performed from 20 to 40%
taxes band by 5% difference.
Observing how if the
goverment policies developed
by a country support
renewable energy wind
projects with 20% taxes, that
will improve +36% more the
NPV. On the other hand, a bad
policy desicion making to
increase taxes, will devaluate
our NPV to -36%.
Project Financial Evaluation
Sensitivity Analysis
Interest Rate NPV (thousand €) IRR % NPV % Change IIR % Change
3,0% 2.844 € 10% 81% 22%
4,0% 2.419 € 9% 54% 14%
5,0% 1.994 € 8% 27% 7%
6,0% 1.569 € 8% 0% 0%
7,0% 1.143 € 7% -27% -7%
8,0% 718 € 7% -54% -13%
Interest Rate Variation
Interest Variation: Looking at
the results, small increments
on the interest rate by the
banks will totally diminish the
NPV of our project. Example
from current 6% to 8% interest
rate will reduce the NPV -54%
their value.
Project Financial Evaluation
Sensitivity Analysis
Energy
Price
(€/MWh)
NPV (thousand €) IRR % NPV % Change IIR % Change
79 -2.780 € 3% -277% -64%
89 -606 € 5% -139% -32%
99 1.569 € 8% 0% 0%
109 3.743 € 10% 139% 34%
119 5.917 € 13% 277% 68%
Energy Price Variation
Energy Price Variation: Having
positive policies that provide
and attractive feed in tariff
retribution, example of values
higher than 99 €/MWh,
increases drastically our IRR%
and NPV peformaces. On the
other hand, an history of
policy changes of excluding
attractive feed in tariff
retributions, minimizing them
or avoiding them in order to
pay current market price, will
result in lower and even
negative NPV´s. This will make
investors look for other
investment opportunities
outside renewable energy
projects.
THANK YOU!!
Carlos E. Silva carlos.edmundo.silva@gmail.com
Linkedin: https://gr.linkedin.com/in/carlos-silva-1195a22b
126/5MW Wind Turbine – (EOG) Extreme
Operating Gust simulation at rated speed 11.4 m/s
Carlos E. Silva
NTUA Athens May 2016
GAST WORKSHOP
Input Information for the 126/5MW Wind Turbine
EOG at 11.4 m/s
• 11.4 m/s initial wind speed
• 12 RPM initial rotor speed
• Controler with a 80 sec simulation
• Wind shear 0.2
• IWINDC : 2 (extreme condition)
• Time GUST (40 sec), Vref (42.5), Ti (0,16)
Vref = Reference wind speed average over 10 minutes,
A = Designates the category for higher turbulence characteristics
NOTE: Gamesa similar turbine than
the example analized.
IEC 61400-1 Ed.3 Extreme Wind Conditions
It includes:
• Wind shear events
• Peak wind speeds due to storms
• Rapid changes in wind speed and
direction.
It involves:
 Extreme wind speed model (EWM)
 Extreme operating gust (EOG)
 Extreme turbulence model (ETM)
 Extreme direction change (EDC)
 Extreme gust with direction change (ECD)
 Extreme wind shear (EWS)
• Extreme operating gust (EOG)
Time GUST (40 sec), Vref (42.5), Ti (0,16)
Longitudinal turbulence scale parameter
(89.56)r:
Hub height gust magnitude:
Turbulence standard deviation:
Wind profile (wind shear 0.2)
Wind speed:
What happens at the wind
blades with Extreme GUST?
Looking at the wind behavior!
GUST effect at Hub velocity (m/s) – Class IIA 5MW Wind Turbine
42.5
sec
45.2
sec
48.1
sec
11.4 m/sec
15.7 m/sec
Looking at the blades!
Hub wind velocity vs. blade tip/middle section Effective velocity (m/s))
Hub velocity
Blade middle
section
Blade tip section
Disk Induced flow
(Axial induction factor)
Rotor rotation
Flow rotation
(Tangential induction factor)
Looking at the blades!
Pitch angle of blades (deg)
45.2 sec
“pitch regulation kicks in”
47.6
sec
Looking at the blades!
Pitch angle and Angle of Attack (deg)
Disk Induced flow
(Axial induction factor)
Pitch Angle
Angle of Attack
45.2 sec
Looking at the blades!
Blade tip section - Axial and Tangential Induction Factor
Tangential Induction
Factor
Axial Induction
Factor
(Vel. Reduction Rate)
Disk Induced flow
(Axial induction factor)
Rotor rotation
Flow rotation
(Tangential induction factor)
45.2 sec
Looking at the blades!
Total Aerodynamic Thrust (kN)
45.2
sec
48
sec
Looking at the blades!
Tip - Flapwise deformation (m) – Max deformation!
45.2 sec
7.7m
48 sec
Rotor plain position
Transient
Response
Looking at the blades!
Mx and Mz: moment at the root (kNm) – Max Moment!
45.2 sec
14,200 kNm
48
sec
Flapwise
Edgewise
Looking at the blades!
Mx: x moment at the root (kNm) -> 3 blades
45.2
sec
48
sec
Looking at the blades!
Mx: x moment at the root (kNm) -> 3 blades
45.2 sec
14,200 kNm
48
sec
How the low speed shaft reacts to GUST?
Looking at the low speed shaft!
Rotor speed (rad/s), wrt low speed shaft
43.5
sec
46.5
sec
12 RPM
13.1 RPM
11.7 RPM
11.26 RPM
Looking at the low speed shaft!
Total Aerodynamic Torque (kNm) & Rotor Speed (rad/sec)
Total Aerodynamic
Torque
Low Speed Shaft
Rotor speed
42.5
sec
45.2
sec
48.1
sec
50
sec
Looking at the low speed shaft!
Total Aerodynamic & Generator Torque Low Speed Shaft (kNm)
Total Aerodynamic
Torque
Generator Torque Low
Speed Shaft
42.5
sec
45.2
sec
48.1
sec
4,800 kNm
What happens at the tower with Extreme GUST?
Lets pretend the Wind Turbine
is generating electricity!
Will this guy fall if the tower
shakes too much?
If not at least he
will be
fired……..Safety
first!
Looking at the tower!
X and Z Tower Displacement (m)
43.2
sec
45.5 sec
0.7 m
fore-aft
side-to-side
0.8 m displacement in 2 sec
Looking at the tower!
Mx and Mz: moment at the tower base (kNm)
43.2
sec
45.5 sec
105,000 kNm
Fore Aft
Twisting
Conclusions!
• 7.7m blade maximum flapwise deformation.
• 14,200 kNm flapwise root moment.
• 4,800 kNM max shaft torque.
• 105.000 kNM tower base moment at the fore aft
direction.
As the wind turbine “control system” could not avoid the highest loads generated
by the peak gust wind speed. The Wind turbine need to be designed to withstand:
Possible Solution: If the “control system” reaction gets faster, it will activate
pitching before in order to reduce the maximum loads. However this needs to
be analyzed after all the extreme cases are taken in to consideration for our
turbine design.
THANK YOU!!
Carlos E. Silva carlos.edmundo.silva@gmail.com
Linkedin: https://gr.linkedin.com/in/carlos-silva-1195a22b
Wind Power Industry and its Global Players
by
Carlos E. Silva
NTUA Athens, May 2016
Introduction
Global Energy Powerty!
We have serious global problems!
• 1 of 7 in the worlds population live without
electricity!! (Around 1.3 billion people)
• 17%of global population lack access to electricity!
The world is melting!
• 2015 as the hottest year vs. preindustrial times!
• COP21 goal: Keep it lower than +2C.
• 2015 is already +1C higher.
• 2016 on their way to become 3rd hottest year in a
row!
Wind Power Industry and its Global Players - Presentation Content
1. Global Wind and Solar
Resource
2. Market Development
3. Main Wind Industry
Players
4. Manufacturers
Competitive Analysis
5. General Conclusions
1.Global Wind and Solar
Resource
2.Market Development
3.Main Wind Industry Players
4.Manufacturers Competitive
Analysis
5.General Conclusions
THANK YOU!!
Carlos E. Silva csilva.nem@gmail.com
Linkedin: https://gr.linkedin.com/in/carlos-silva-1195a22b

More Related Content

What's hot

Hardware-in-the-loop simulator of wind turbine emulator using labview
Hardware-in-the-loop simulator of wind turbine emulator using labviewHardware-in-the-loop simulator of wind turbine emulator using labview
Hardware-in-the-loop simulator of wind turbine emulator using labview
International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems
 
Design Construction, Simulation and Testing of A 300W Wind-Powered Battery Ch...
Design Construction, Simulation and Testing of A 300W Wind-Powered Battery Ch...Design Construction, Simulation and Testing of A 300W Wind-Powered Battery Ch...
Design Construction, Simulation and Testing of A 300W Wind-Powered Battery Ch...
theijes
 
2. enhanced pitch control characteristics of a dfig based wind turbine using ...
2. enhanced pitch control characteristics of a dfig based wind turbine using ...2. enhanced pitch control characteristics of a dfig based wind turbine using ...
2. enhanced pitch control characteristics of a dfig based wind turbine using ...
k srikanth
 
Thesis- Cont sys for wind turbines (Sept 2015 revision)
Thesis- Cont sys for wind turbines (Sept 2015 revision)Thesis- Cont sys for wind turbines (Sept 2015 revision)
Thesis- Cont sys for wind turbines (Sept 2015 revision)Larry Branscomb
 
Ingeteam participates in round table on Power Transfer and Conversion
 Ingeteam participates in round table on Power Transfer and Conversion Ingeteam participates in round table on Power Transfer and Conversion
Ingeteam participates in round table on Power Transfer and Conversion
Ingeteam Wind Energy
 
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
Shubham Garg
 
Implementation and assemplingof a small wind turbine
Implementation and assemplingof a small wind turbineImplementation and assemplingof a small wind turbine
Implementation and assemplingof a small wind turbine
Rayan Hameed
 
Using position control to improve the efficiency of wind turbine
Using position control to improve the efficiency of wind turbineUsing position control to improve the efficiency of wind turbine
Using position control to improve the efficiency of wind turbine
TELKOMNIKA JOURNAL
 
IRJET - Measurement and Analysis of the Voltage Current Characteristic of a M...
IRJET - Measurement and Analysis of the Voltage Current Characteristic of a M...IRJET - Measurement and Analysis of the Voltage Current Characteristic of a M...
IRJET - Measurement and Analysis of the Voltage Current Characteristic of a M...
IRJET Journal
 
A Review: Control Strategy of Doubly Fed Induction Generator
A Review: Control Strategy of Doubly Fed Induction GeneratorA Review: Control Strategy of Doubly Fed Induction Generator
A Review: Control Strategy of Doubly Fed Induction Generator
IRJET Journal
 
Sliding mode performance control applied to a DFIG system for a wind energy p...
Sliding mode performance control applied to a DFIG system for a wind energy p...Sliding mode performance control applied to a DFIG system for a wind energy p...
Sliding mode performance control applied to a DFIG system for a wind energy p...
IJECEIAES
 
Wind turbine power curves types & factors for evaluation
Wind turbine power curves   types & factors for evaluationWind turbine power curves   types & factors for evaluation
Wind turbine power curves types & factors for evaluation
vasishta bhargava
 
COOP training-Bokhari
COOP training-BokhariCOOP training-Bokhari
COOP training-BokhariAssad Bokhari
 
Design and construction of vertical axis wind turbine
Design and construction of vertical axis wind turbineDesign and construction of vertical axis wind turbine
Design and construction of vertical axis wind turbine
IAEME Publication
 
2 2 mitchell lee_am and pwat spectral correction_pvpmc5
2 2 mitchell lee_am and pwat spectral correction_pvpmc52 2 mitchell lee_am and pwat spectral correction_pvpmc5
2 2 mitchell lee_am and pwat spectral correction_pvpmc5
Sandia National Laboratories: Energy & Climate: Renewables
 
PSO-Backstepping controller of a grid connected DFIG based wind turbine
PSO-Backstepping controller of a grid connected DFIG based wind turbine PSO-Backstepping controller of a grid connected DFIG based wind turbine
PSO-Backstepping controller of a grid connected DFIG based wind turbine
IJECEIAES
 
IRJET- Experiment Study on Rotational Behaviour of a Savonous Wind Turbin...
IRJET-  	  Experiment Study on Rotational Behaviour of a Savonous Wind Turbin...IRJET-  	  Experiment Study on Rotational Behaviour of a Savonous Wind Turbin...
IRJET- Experiment Study on Rotational Behaviour of a Savonous Wind Turbin...
IRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Manufacturing System of Hybrid Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
IRJET- Manufacturing System of Hybrid Vertical Axis Wind TurbineIRJET- Manufacturing System of Hybrid Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
IRJET- Manufacturing System of Hybrid Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
IRJET Journal
 
Performance of a vector control for DFIG driven by wind turbine: real time si...
Performance of a vector control for DFIG driven by wind turbine: real time si...Performance of a vector control for DFIG driven by wind turbine: real time si...
Performance of a vector control for DFIG driven by wind turbine: real time si...
International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems
 

What's hot (20)

Hardware-in-the-loop simulator of wind turbine emulator using labview
Hardware-in-the-loop simulator of wind turbine emulator using labviewHardware-in-the-loop simulator of wind turbine emulator using labview
Hardware-in-the-loop simulator of wind turbine emulator using labview
 
Design Construction, Simulation and Testing of A 300W Wind-Powered Battery Ch...
Design Construction, Simulation and Testing of A 300W Wind-Powered Battery Ch...Design Construction, Simulation and Testing of A 300W Wind-Powered Battery Ch...
Design Construction, Simulation and Testing of A 300W Wind-Powered Battery Ch...
 
2. enhanced pitch control characteristics of a dfig based wind turbine using ...
2. enhanced pitch control characteristics of a dfig based wind turbine using ...2. enhanced pitch control characteristics of a dfig based wind turbine using ...
2. enhanced pitch control characteristics of a dfig based wind turbine using ...
 
Thesis- Cont sys for wind turbines (Sept 2015 revision)
Thesis- Cont sys for wind turbines (Sept 2015 revision)Thesis- Cont sys for wind turbines (Sept 2015 revision)
Thesis- Cont sys for wind turbines (Sept 2015 revision)
 
Ingeteam participates in round table on Power Transfer and Conversion
 Ingeteam participates in round table on Power Transfer and Conversion Ingeteam participates in round table on Power Transfer and Conversion
Ingeteam participates in round table on Power Transfer and Conversion
 
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
8b80ade8 7b96-4114-9e36-76dcf21dc74d-150219134514-conversion-gate02 (1) (1) (...
 
Implementation and assemplingof a small wind turbine
Implementation and assemplingof a small wind turbineImplementation and assemplingof a small wind turbine
Implementation and assemplingof a small wind turbine
 
Using position control to improve the efficiency of wind turbine
Using position control to improve the efficiency of wind turbineUsing position control to improve the efficiency of wind turbine
Using position control to improve the efficiency of wind turbine
 
IRJET - Measurement and Analysis of the Voltage Current Characteristic of a M...
IRJET - Measurement and Analysis of the Voltage Current Characteristic of a M...IRJET - Measurement and Analysis of the Voltage Current Characteristic of a M...
IRJET - Measurement and Analysis of the Voltage Current Characteristic of a M...
 
A Review: Control Strategy of Doubly Fed Induction Generator
A Review: Control Strategy of Doubly Fed Induction GeneratorA Review: Control Strategy of Doubly Fed Induction Generator
A Review: Control Strategy of Doubly Fed Induction Generator
 
Sliding mode performance control applied to a DFIG system for a wind energy p...
Sliding mode performance control applied to a DFIG system for a wind energy p...Sliding mode performance control applied to a DFIG system for a wind energy p...
Sliding mode performance control applied to a DFIG system for a wind energy p...
 
Wind turbine power curves types & factors for evaluation
Wind turbine power curves   types & factors for evaluationWind turbine power curves   types & factors for evaluation
Wind turbine power curves types & factors for evaluation
 
COOP training-Bokhari
COOP training-BokhariCOOP training-Bokhari
COOP training-Bokhari
 
Design and construction of vertical axis wind turbine
Design and construction of vertical axis wind turbineDesign and construction of vertical axis wind turbine
Design and construction of vertical axis wind turbine
 
2 2 mitchell lee_am and pwat spectral correction_pvpmc5
2 2 mitchell lee_am and pwat spectral correction_pvpmc52 2 mitchell lee_am and pwat spectral correction_pvpmc5
2 2 mitchell lee_am and pwat spectral correction_pvpmc5
 
PSO-Backstepping controller of a grid connected DFIG based wind turbine
PSO-Backstepping controller of a grid connected DFIG based wind turbine PSO-Backstepping controller of a grid connected DFIG based wind turbine
PSO-Backstepping controller of a grid connected DFIG based wind turbine
 
IRJET- Experiment Study on Rotational Behaviour of a Savonous Wind Turbin...
IRJET-  	  Experiment Study on Rotational Behaviour of a Savonous Wind Turbin...IRJET-  	  Experiment Study on Rotational Behaviour of a Savonous Wind Turbin...
IRJET- Experiment Study on Rotational Behaviour of a Savonous Wind Turbin...
 
IRJET- Manufacturing System of Hybrid Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
IRJET- Manufacturing System of Hybrid Vertical Axis Wind TurbineIRJET- Manufacturing System of Hybrid Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
IRJET- Manufacturing System of Hybrid Vertical Axis Wind Turbine
 
Q Plus
Q PlusQ Plus
Q Plus
 
Performance of a vector control for DFIG driven by wind turbine: real time si...
Performance of a vector control for DFIG driven by wind turbine: real time si...Performance of a vector control for DFIG driven by wind turbine: real time si...
Performance of a vector control for DFIG driven by wind turbine: real time si...
 

Similar to EUREC-NTUA Projects - Carlos Silva

Design of Adjustable Blade Wind Turbine for Constant Generated Power
Design of Adjustable Blade Wind Turbine for Constant Generated PowerDesign of Adjustable Blade Wind Turbine for Constant Generated Power
Design of Adjustable Blade Wind Turbine for Constant Generated Power
Rajeev Kumar
 
S4 oman wind energy the technology 2016
S4 oman wind energy the technology 2016S4 oman wind energy the technology 2016
S4 oman wind energy the technology 2016
CETN
 
Wind Resource Assessment
Wind Resource AssessmentWind Resource Assessment
Wind Resource Assessmentmtingle
 
Nir_pres_Hagana_v1
Nir_pres_Hagana_v1Nir_pres_Hagana_v1
Nir_pres_Hagana_v1Nir Morgulis
 
Wind energy tech 2015
Wind energy tech  2015Wind energy tech  2015
Wind energy tech 2015
Lonnie Gamble
 
Analysis and Electricity production by Ocean Current Turbine
Analysis and Electricity production by Ocean Current TurbineAnalysis and Electricity production by Ocean Current Turbine
Analysis and Electricity production by Ocean Current Turbine
Vishwendra Srivastav
 
Wind energy system india
Wind energy system indiaWind energy system india
Wind energy system india
H Janardan Prabhu
 
Active and Reactive Power Control of a Doubly Fed Induction Generator
Active and Reactive Power Control of a Doubly Fed Induction GeneratorActive and Reactive Power Control of a Doubly Fed Induction Generator
Active and Reactive Power Control of a Doubly Fed Induction Generator
IJPEDS-IAES
 
Overview of Wind Energy
Overview of Wind EnergyOverview of Wind Energy
Overview of Wind Energy
Jerilene
 
Capacity building 2010 day 1 wind energy in morocco
Capacity building 2010 day 1 wind energy in moroccoCapacity building 2010 day 1 wind energy in morocco
Capacity building 2010 day 1 wind energy in morocco
RCREEE
 
Horizontal axis wind turbine
Horizontal axis wind turbineHorizontal axis wind turbine
Horizontal axis wind turbine
Rohil Kumar
 
Must-hybrid-power-generation-station {wind turbine (hawt)&solar (pv)}
 Must-hybrid-power-generation-station {wind turbine (hawt)&solar (pv)} Must-hybrid-power-generation-station {wind turbine (hawt)&solar (pv)}
Must-hybrid-power-generation-station {wind turbine (hawt)&solar (pv)}
Mohammed Ahmed Ramadan
 
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE
IAEME Publication
 
Optimizing Energy Yield in Multi-MW Power Converters for Wind by Mikel Zabale...
Optimizing Energy Yield in Multi-MW Power Converters for Wind by Mikel Zabale...Optimizing Energy Yield in Multi-MW Power Converters for Wind by Mikel Zabale...
Optimizing Energy Yield in Multi-MW Power Converters for Wind by Mikel Zabale...
Ingeteam Wind Energy
 
Optimizing energy yield in multi-MW power converters for wind” by Mikel zabal...
Optimizing energy yield in multi-MW power converters for wind” by Mikel zabal...Optimizing energy yield in multi-MW power converters for wind” by Mikel zabal...
Optimizing energy yield in multi-MW power converters for wind” by Mikel zabal...
Ingeteam Wind Energy
 
Development of a low cost test rig for standalone wecs subject to electrical ...
Development of a low cost test rig for standalone wecs subject to electrical ...Development of a low cost test rig for standalone wecs subject to electrical ...
Development of a low cost test rig for standalone wecs subject to electrical ...
ISA Interchange
 
Study About Wind turbines
Study About Wind turbinesStudy About Wind turbines
Study About Wind turbines
Elia Tohmé
 
【潔能講堂】大型風力發電廠之發電效率分析與預測
【潔能講堂】大型風力發電廠之發電效率分析與預測【潔能講堂】大型風力發電廠之發電效率分析與預測
【潔能講堂】大型風力發電廠之發電效率分析與預測
Energy-Education-Resource-Center
 
Wind Turbine Generators
Wind Turbine GeneratorsWind Turbine Generators
Wind Turbine GeneratorsJasjot Singh
 
Drivers and Barriers in the current CSP market
Drivers and Barriers in the current CSP marketDrivers and Barriers in the current CSP market
Drivers and Barriers in the current CSP market
Leonardo ENERGY
 

Similar to EUREC-NTUA Projects - Carlos Silva (20)

Design of Adjustable Blade Wind Turbine for Constant Generated Power
Design of Adjustable Blade Wind Turbine for Constant Generated PowerDesign of Adjustable Blade Wind Turbine for Constant Generated Power
Design of Adjustable Blade Wind Turbine for Constant Generated Power
 
S4 oman wind energy the technology 2016
S4 oman wind energy the technology 2016S4 oman wind energy the technology 2016
S4 oman wind energy the technology 2016
 
Wind Resource Assessment
Wind Resource AssessmentWind Resource Assessment
Wind Resource Assessment
 
Nir_pres_Hagana_v1
Nir_pres_Hagana_v1Nir_pres_Hagana_v1
Nir_pres_Hagana_v1
 
Wind energy tech 2015
Wind energy tech  2015Wind energy tech  2015
Wind energy tech 2015
 
Analysis and Electricity production by Ocean Current Turbine
Analysis and Electricity production by Ocean Current TurbineAnalysis and Electricity production by Ocean Current Turbine
Analysis and Electricity production by Ocean Current Turbine
 
Wind energy system india
Wind energy system indiaWind energy system india
Wind energy system india
 
Active and Reactive Power Control of a Doubly Fed Induction Generator
Active and Reactive Power Control of a Doubly Fed Induction GeneratorActive and Reactive Power Control of a Doubly Fed Induction Generator
Active and Reactive Power Control of a Doubly Fed Induction Generator
 
Overview of Wind Energy
Overview of Wind EnergyOverview of Wind Energy
Overview of Wind Energy
 
Capacity building 2010 day 1 wind energy in morocco
Capacity building 2010 day 1 wind energy in moroccoCapacity building 2010 day 1 wind energy in morocco
Capacity building 2010 day 1 wind energy in morocco
 
Horizontal axis wind turbine
Horizontal axis wind turbineHorizontal axis wind turbine
Horizontal axis wind turbine
 
Must-hybrid-power-generation-station {wind turbine (hawt)&solar (pv)}
 Must-hybrid-power-generation-station {wind turbine (hawt)&solar (pv)} Must-hybrid-power-generation-station {wind turbine (hawt)&solar (pv)}
Must-hybrid-power-generation-station {wind turbine (hawt)&solar (pv)}
 
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE
DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION OF VERTICAL AXIS WIND TURBINE
 
Optimizing Energy Yield in Multi-MW Power Converters for Wind by Mikel Zabale...
Optimizing Energy Yield in Multi-MW Power Converters for Wind by Mikel Zabale...Optimizing Energy Yield in Multi-MW Power Converters for Wind by Mikel Zabale...
Optimizing Energy Yield in Multi-MW Power Converters for Wind by Mikel Zabale...
 
Optimizing energy yield in multi-MW power converters for wind” by Mikel zabal...
Optimizing energy yield in multi-MW power converters for wind” by Mikel zabal...Optimizing energy yield in multi-MW power converters for wind” by Mikel zabal...
Optimizing energy yield in multi-MW power converters for wind” by Mikel zabal...
 
Development of a low cost test rig for standalone wecs subject to electrical ...
Development of a low cost test rig for standalone wecs subject to electrical ...Development of a low cost test rig for standalone wecs subject to electrical ...
Development of a low cost test rig for standalone wecs subject to electrical ...
 
Study About Wind turbines
Study About Wind turbinesStudy About Wind turbines
Study About Wind turbines
 
【潔能講堂】大型風力發電廠之發電效率分析與預測
【潔能講堂】大型風力發電廠之發電效率分析與預測【潔能講堂】大型風力發電廠之發電效率分析與預測
【潔能講堂】大型風力發電廠之發電效率分析與預測
 
Wind Turbine Generators
Wind Turbine GeneratorsWind Turbine Generators
Wind Turbine Generators
 
Drivers and Barriers in the current CSP market
Drivers and Barriers in the current CSP marketDrivers and Barriers in the current CSP market
Drivers and Barriers in the current CSP market
 

EUREC-NTUA Projects - Carlos Silva

  • 1. Wind Farm Study – EUREC 2016 Carlos E. Silva NTUA Athens 2016
  • 3. Wind Measurement Data Analysis 1 year wind data (10 minutes averaged wind velocity) Hub height Wind Speed Wind direction Site wind provided by a R&D Energy Center.
  • 4. Wind Measurement Data Analysis Avg. Probability and Wind Speed Roses. 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WS W W WN W NW NN W Avg. Probability - 2,0 4,0 6,0 8,0 N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Avg. Wind Speed • WNW - S = 80 % from Operational Time! • NW – WNW = Strongest AWS (7.2 m/s) • WSW – SSW = Highest Operational Demand! (6.8 m/s) Wind Rose Parameters No. Wind Segments 16 Total angle [°] 360 Angle/direction [°] 22,5 First Segment Angle [°] 348,75 Uave [m/s] 6,41 Std.Dev 3,35
  • 5. Wind Measurement Data Analysis Wind Rose 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 16% 18% N NNE NE ENE E ESE SE SSE S SSW SW WSW W WNW NW NNW Wind Rose 0 to 4 4 to 8 8 to 12 12 to 16 16 to 20 20 to 24 24 to 28 28 to 32
  • 6. - 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 WindSpeed[m/s] Month Mean monthly wind speed variation Wind Measurement Data Analysis Mean monthly wind speed variation. Month Uave [m/s] January 7,33 February 7,52 March 6,18 April 5,40 May 6,58 June 6,51 July 6,99 August 8,23 September 5,38 October 6,13 November 6,39 December 4,23 Total Uave 6,41
  • 7. Wind Measurement Data Analysis Turbulence Intensity 0 0,1 0,2 0,3 0,4 0,5 0,6 0,7 0,8 0,9 1 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 TurbulenceIntensity% Hub Wind Speed (m/s) Turbulence Intensity per Hub Wind Speed  Determine the Wind Turbine Iref (A,B or C) using IEC 61400-1 Ed.3 Wind Classification
  • 8. Wind Measurement Data Analysis Weibull Semi-Empirical, Least Square Fit method and Bins Probability Bowden Semi-Empirical Shape Factor K 2,02 Scale Factor C 7,23 Uave [m/s] 6,41 Least Square Shape Factor K 1,85 Scale Factor C 7,52 Uave [m/s] 6,67 Semi Empirical Least Square 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% 14% 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 Probability% Wind Speed m/s Weibull Distribution Comparison Bowden Semi-Empirical Probability per bins Least Square
  • 9. Site Wind Turbine Selection
  • 10. Site Wind Turbine Selection 2MW Wind Turbine R&D Benchmark Test Turbine Selection Vave [m/s] 6,4 Hub Height [m] 90 Diameter [m] 90 Vmax[m/s] 32 Reference cost for the test turbine (€/kW) 950 TEST TURBINE DESIGN CHARACTERISTICS Power (kW) 2000 Diameter (m) 90,0 Max Tip Speed (m/s) 80,0 Drive Train Efficiency 94,00% Omega Rotor max (rad/s) 1,78 RPM Rotor max 16,98 Rated Rotor Torque (kNm) 1197 x = 1,50 COMPONENTS MASS & COST MASS (kg) COST (euro) Three Blades 19.677 255.801 Gearbox 10.308 123.690 Generator 5.550 80.478 Cost of blades, Gearbox, Generator 459.969 Rest cost of drive train (nacelle, power electronics, pitch etc)459.969 Subtotal drive train 919.938 980.062 Total cost of wind turbine 1.900.000 Share of BL, GB, Gen in the total WT cost 24,2% Cost of the hub  90 m diameter as a reference turbine!  Class III Wind Turbine! ave refV 0.2V
  • 11. Site Wind Turbine Selection and Power Curves What the competition has available for IEC III 2 MW Wind Turbines? Project Wind Data Vave [m/s] 6,41 C 7,23 Std.Dev 3,4 K 2,021
  • 12. Site Wind Turbine Selection 2MW Wind Turbine R&D Benchmark  90 m diameter as a reference turbine.  + 80 and 100m diameters for industry competition Go-To-Market! 3 Project testing diameters: 80, 90 and 100 m IEC Class III (6 - 7.5 m/s) 80 m 90 m 100 m
  • 13. Site Wind Turbine Selection NTUA – 2 MW PLATFORM ASSORTMENT
  • 14. Site Wind Turbine Selection LCOE per 2 MW Product Range Diameters  Lowest LCOE !  Highest Annual Energy Output !  39,2 % Capacity Factor!  +14 % Wind Turbine Cost vs. 90m diameter! Selection of our IEC III- NTUA/2MW 100 m diameter & tower height wind turbine: WIN – WIN SOLUTION!!!!! 80 90 100 100 Vs. 80 100 Vs. 90 Avg. Wind Speed [m/s] 6,41 6,41 6,41 Avg. Power Output [kW] 592 697 783 32% 12% Avg. Power Output per RA[kW/m^2] 0,03 0,03 0,02 -15% -9% Annual Energy Output [GWh] 4,93 5,80 6,52 32% 12% Capacity Factor (%) 29,6% 34,8% 39,2% 32% 12% LCOE [€/kWh] 0,064 0,060 0,058 -9% -3% LCOE [€/MWh] 63,86 59,56 57,93 -9% -3% Wind Turbine Cost [€] 1.638.360 1.900.000 2.174.272 33% 14% Wind Turbine Project Indicators Wind Turbine Diameters 100 m diameter performace 2 MW Wind Turbines Range
  • 15. Site Wind Turbine Selection LCOE per Technology
  • 16. Site Wind Turbine Selection 2 MW Vs. 3 MW Platform
  • 17. Site Wind Turbine Selection 3 MW Platform LCOE X More Expensive LCOE vs 2 MW!  18% Higher Annual Energy Output vs. 2MW platform! X 30,7 % Capacity Factor!  +17 % Wind Turbine Cost vs. 2 MW platform! What happens If we upscale the wind turbine to a 3 MW platform! 2 MW 3 MW Difference 100 100 100 Vs. 80 Avg. Wind Speed [m/s] 6,41 6,41 Avg. Power Output [kW] 783 922 18% Avg. Power Output per RA[kW/m^2] 0,02 0,03 18% Annual Energy Output [GWh] 6,52 7,67 18% Capacity Factor (%) 39,2% 30,7% -22% LCOE [€/kWh] 0,058 0,063 9% LCOE [€/MWh] 57,93 62,85 9% Wind Turbine Cost [€] 2.174.272 2.543.076 17% Wind Turbine Project Indicators 100 m diameter 2MW vs. 3MW Platform
  • 18. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance
  • 19. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Pitch Regulation and Variable Speed Design
  • 20. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Pitch Angle & Rotor Speed Variation per Wind Velocity
  • 21. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Thrust per wind speed
  • 22. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Power coefficient – Tip speed ratio
  • 23. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Thrust coefficient – Tip speed ratio
  • 24. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Variable Speed Power Output & Thrust
  • 25. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Rotor Aerodynamics
  • 26. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Angle of Attack per blade lenght
  • 27. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Axian Induction Factor per blade lenght
  • 28. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Tangential Induction Factor per blade lenght
  • 29. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Normal Force per blade lenght
  • 30. IEC III NTUA 100/2MW Wind Turbine Performance Tangential Force per blade lenght
  • 31. Wind Penetration Limits for a non-interconnected power system
  • 32. Wind Penetration Limits What is Wind Curltailment? It means that wind was available, but the grid operator did not allow the wind farm to put power on the grid (not dispatched). There are 2 kinds of dispatching rules: Physical Imperatives to keep the grid in balance: • Matching load • Not over-loading transmission lines • Taking into account how quickly various plants can come on-line. Economics and other non-physical issues: • Dispatching the least expensive plants first • Giving renewables a favored position in the line-up.
  • 33. Wind Penetration Limits Off-Grid System Annual Electricity Demand 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 1 400 799 1198 1597 1996 2395 2794 3193 3592 3991 4390 4789 5188 5587 5986 6385 6784 7183 7582 7981 8380 Demand(MW) Time (hr) Power Demand Demand characteristics Maximum power demand 34,1 MW Minimum power demand 6,7 MW Annual electricity demand 118,04 GWh Annual mean load 13,5 MW Maximum Power Demand Annual Mean Load
  • 34. Wind Penetration Limits Simplified Diagram 6.4 m/S 76%
  • 35. Wind Penetration Limits Simplified Diagram Total Load Demand (MWh) 118.036 118.036 118.036 Average Load (MW) 13,5 13,5 13,5 Average Wind Speed (m/s) 6,4 6,4 6,4 Power Rated per Wind Turbine (MW) 2 2 2 Number of Wind Turbines 6 5 4 Total Wind Turbine Capacity (MW) 12 10 8 Wind Installed Capacity (%) 89% 74% 59% Capacity Factor (%) 39,2% 39,2% 39,2% Absorbed by the grid (%) 68% 76% 86% Rejected by the grid (%) 32,0% 24,0% 14,0% Total Wind Energy Production (MWh) 39.110 32.592 26.073 Total Wind Energy Absorbed by the grid (MWh) 26.595 24.770 22.423 Real Capacity Factor (%) 25% 28% 32% Wind Supply (%) 23% 21% 19% Simplified Diagram Tables The right balance across installed wind capacity and the 20% wind energy annual energy supply is found at 10 MW (5 turbines), providing: • 24% curtailment • 28% capacity factor • 21% wind energy annual electricity supply
  • 36. Wind Penetration Limits Probabilistic Approach No. Turbines Rated Capacity (MW) Data 5 2 Wind Capacity 10 MW Wind capacity as percentage of the average load 74,2% Number of diesel units 10 Rated power of diesel unit 3,5 MW Diesel units technical minimum 40% Diesel Total Capacity 35 MW Diesel technical minimum capacity 14 MW Wind and Diesel Capacity Wind energy which could be produced 33645 MWh Wind Absorbed + Rejected 34,04 GWh Wind energy absorbed by the grid 23,5 GWh Wind energy rejected 10,5 GWh Percentage of rejected wind energy 30,8% Conventional energy produced 94,49 MWh Conv+Wind absorbed 118,04 MWh Capacity factor available 38,41% Capacity factor real 26,88% % wind supply 20% Results Wind Penetration Limits Maximum instantaneous wind supply "δ" 38% With a 38% wind penetration: • We only require 5 turbines with a total of 10 MW installed wind capacity. • 74,2 % from the average load. The wind curtailment is 30,8 % and the capacity factor is 26,88 %.
  • 37. Capacity Credit For a non-interconnected power system
  • 38. Capacity Credit Capacity Credit Calculation Wind Installed Capacity (MW) 10,0 LOLE System before wind installations 0,053% LOLE System after wind installations 0,053% ELCC 1,5 CC 15% Capacity Credit Calculation Capacity credit is the level of conventional generation that can be replaced with wind generation. To perform such an analysis, it is important to define the way in which one type of resource can be substituted for another. Number of units 10 Mean rated power of each unit 3,5 MW Total conventional capacity 35 MW Propability of each unit to be available 95% Propability of each unit not to be available 5% CONVENTIONAL CAPACITY DATA For our case, we measured the system reliability with the loss-of-load expectation (LOLE), which is an indication of the statistically expected number of times within a given time period that the system could not provide the demand load. When the given level of wind-generating capacity can be substituted for conventional capacity, holding the reliability level constant, we obtained the measure of wind plant capacity credit with 15%
  • 39. Wake Effect Losses 5 turbines 100m/2MW - Flat Terrain
  • 40. Wake Effect Losses Main Frecuency wind speed and wind sectors As defined by the Wind Rose, our site 2 main operational wind speeds are coming from 3 main wind direction sectors: SSW, WSW and WNW (202.5, 247.5 and 292.5 deg). This is a decision factor to position our turbines and minimize the Wake Effect Losses.
  • 41. Wake Effect Losses Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 1 6.195 5.717 7,71% Wind Farm Losses Wind Energy Production [MWh] Wind Energy Production with Wake Effect [MWh] Wake Losses The first project proposal is arranged in order to take the biggest advantage of the SSW and WSW wind rose directions, the 2 biggest main sectors.
  • 42. Wake Effect Losses Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 1 292,5 deg – 11,31% frecuency 12,04 % losses 247,5 deg – 14,33% frecuency 1,42 % losses 202,5 deg – 14,03% frecuency 2,12 % losses
  • 43. Wake Effect Losses Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 2 6.195 5.792 6,51% Wind Farm Losses Wind Energy Production [MWh] Wind Energy Production with Wake Effect [MWh] Wake Losses The aim from the second project proposal is to look for a wind turbine arrangement able to reduce more drastically the losses generated by the 292,5 deg wind direction and the separation of wind turbines to have an even cleaner wind segments at the 2 main wind directions 247,5 and 202,5 deg.
  • 44. Wake Effect Losses Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 2 292,5 deg – 11,31% frecuency 8,94 % losses 247,5 deg – 14,33% frecuency 0,92 % losses 202,5 deg – 14,03% frecuency 1,05 % losses
  • 45. Wake Effect Losses Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 3 6.195 5.819 6,07% Wind Farm Losses Wind Energy Production [MWh] Wind Energy Production with Wake Effect [MWh] Wake Losses For the final proposal, witch is the project selection, the aim was to find the proper separation across turbines from the wind direction 292,5 deg that wont harm negatively the wind turbiness efficiency from the 247,5 and 202,5 deg wind sectors.
  • 46. Wake Effect Losses Analysis Wind Farm Proposal 3 292,5 deg – 11,31% frecuency 7,55 % losses 247,5 deg – 14,33% frecuency 0,50 % losses 202,5 deg – 14,03% frecuency 0,48 % losses
  • 48. Project Financial Evaluation Financial Assessment NPV (thousand €) IRR % PBP (years) 1.569 7,85% 12 Wind Turbines Capacity (MW) 2 Wind Turbines 5 Wind Farm Capacity (MW) 10 Load factor 0,27 Total Investment Cost (€) 16.111.359 Wind Turbine Cost (€) 2.174.272 Other Cost (€/kW) 524 Operational cost (% Inv.Cost) 3,0% Tax (%) 35% Depreciation rate (%) 10% Interest rate (%) 6% Feed-inTariff (€/MWh) 99 Discount rate (%) 6% Salvage value (% Inv.Cost) 20% Rate to local authorities (% Income) 0% Availability (%) 98% Electricity Production (MWh) 23073 Wake Losses 6,07% Electricity Production (MWh) 21.673 FINANCIAL PARAMETERS
  • 49. Project Financial Evaluation Sensitivity Analysis Taxes NPV (thousand €) IRR % NPV % Change IIR % Change 20% 2.593 € 9% 36% 8% 25% 2.252 € 9% 18% 4% 30% 1.910 € 8% 0% 0% 35% 1.569 € 8% -18% -4% 40% 1.227 € 7% -36% -9% Taxes Variation Taxes Variation: the analysis was performed from 20 to 40% taxes band by 5% difference. Observing how if the goverment policies developed by a country support renewable energy wind projects with 20% taxes, that will improve +36% more the NPV. On the other hand, a bad policy desicion making to increase taxes, will devaluate our NPV to -36%.
  • 50. Project Financial Evaluation Sensitivity Analysis Interest Rate NPV (thousand €) IRR % NPV % Change IIR % Change 3,0% 2.844 € 10% 81% 22% 4,0% 2.419 € 9% 54% 14% 5,0% 1.994 € 8% 27% 7% 6,0% 1.569 € 8% 0% 0% 7,0% 1.143 € 7% -27% -7% 8,0% 718 € 7% -54% -13% Interest Rate Variation Interest Variation: Looking at the results, small increments on the interest rate by the banks will totally diminish the NPV of our project. Example from current 6% to 8% interest rate will reduce the NPV -54% their value.
  • 51. Project Financial Evaluation Sensitivity Analysis Energy Price (€/MWh) NPV (thousand €) IRR % NPV % Change IIR % Change 79 -2.780 € 3% -277% -64% 89 -606 € 5% -139% -32% 99 1.569 € 8% 0% 0% 109 3.743 € 10% 139% 34% 119 5.917 € 13% 277% 68% Energy Price Variation Energy Price Variation: Having positive policies that provide and attractive feed in tariff retribution, example of values higher than 99 €/MWh, increases drastically our IRR% and NPV peformaces. On the other hand, an history of policy changes of excluding attractive feed in tariff retributions, minimizing them or avoiding them in order to pay current market price, will result in lower and even negative NPV´s. This will make investors look for other investment opportunities outside renewable energy projects.
  • 52. THANK YOU!! Carlos E. Silva carlos.edmundo.silva@gmail.com Linkedin: https://gr.linkedin.com/in/carlos-silva-1195a22b
  • 53. 126/5MW Wind Turbine – (EOG) Extreme Operating Gust simulation at rated speed 11.4 m/s Carlos E. Silva NTUA Athens May 2016
  • 54. GAST WORKSHOP Input Information for the 126/5MW Wind Turbine EOG at 11.4 m/s • 11.4 m/s initial wind speed • 12 RPM initial rotor speed • Controler with a 80 sec simulation • Wind shear 0.2 • IWINDC : 2 (extreme condition) • Time GUST (40 sec), Vref (42.5), Ti (0,16) Vref = Reference wind speed average over 10 minutes, A = Designates the category for higher turbulence characteristics NOTE: Gamesa similar turbine than the example analized.
  • 55. IEC 61400-1 Ed.3 Extreme Wind Conditions It includes: • Wind shear events • Peak wind speeds due to storms • Rapid changes in wind speed and direction. It involves:  Extreme wind speed model (EWM)  Extreme operating gust (EOG)  Extreme turbulence model (ETM)  Extreme direction change (EDC)  Extreme gust with direction change (ECD)  Extreme wind shear (EWS) • Extreme operating gust (EOG) Time GUST (40 sec), Vref (42.5), Ti (0,16) Longitudinal turbulence scale parameter (89.56)r: Hub height gust magnitude: Turbulence standard deviation: Wind profile (wind shear 0.2) Wind speed:
  • 56. What happens at the wind blades with Extreme GUST?
  • 57. Looking at the wind behavior! GUST effect at Hub velocity (m/s) – Class IIA 5MW Wind Turbine 42.5 sec 45.2 sec 48.1 sec 11.4 m/sec 15.7 m/sec
  • 58. Looking at the blades! Hub wind velocity vs. blade tip/middle section Effective velocity (m/s)) Hub velocity Blade middle section Blade tip section Disk Induced flow (Axial induction factor) Rotor rotation Flow rotation (Tangential induction factor)
  • 59. Looking at the blades! Pitch angle of blades (deg) 45.2 sec “pitch regulation kicks in” 47.6 sec
  • 60. Looking at the blades! Pitch angle and Angle of Attack (deg) Disk Induced flow (Axial induction factor) Pitch Angle Angle of Attack 45.2 sec
  • 61. Looking at the blades! Blade tip section - Axial and Tangential Induction Factor Tangential Induction Factor Axial Induction Factor (Vel. Reduction Rate) Disk Induced flow (Axial induction factor) Rotor rotation Flow rotation (Tangential induction factor) 45.2 sec
  • 62. Looking at the blades! Total Aerodynamic Thrust (kN) 45.2 sec 48 sec
  • 63. Looking at the blades! Tip - Flapwise deformation (m) – Max deformation! 45.2 sec 7.7m 48 sec Rotor plain position Transient Response
  • 64. Looking at the blades! Mx and Mz: moment at the root (kNm) – Max Moment! 45.2 sec 14,200 kNm 48 sec Flapwise Edgewise
  • 65. Looking at the blades! Mx: x moment at the root (kNm) -> 3 blades 45.2 sec 48 sec
  • 66. Looking at the blades! Mx: x moment at the root (kNm) -> 3 blades 45.2 sec 14,200 kNm 48 sec
  • 67. How the low speed shaft reacts to GUST?
  • 68. Looking at the low speed shaft! Rotor speed (rad/s), wrt low speed shaft 43.5 sec 46.5 sec 12 RPM 13.1 RPM 11.7 RPM 11.26 RPM
  • 69. Looking at the low speed shaft! Total Aerodynamic Torque (kNm) & Rotor Speed (rad/sec) Total Aerodynamic Torque Low Speed Shaft Rotor speed 42.5 sec 45.2 sec 48.1 sec 50 sec
  • 70. Looking at the low speed shaft! Total Aerodynamic & Generator Torque Low Speed Shaft (kNm) Total Aerodynamic Torque Generator Torque Low Speed Shaft 42.5 sec 45.2 sec 48.1 sec 4,800 kNm
  • 71. What happens at the tower with Extreme GUST? Lets pretend the Wind Turbine is generating electricity! Will this guy fall if the tower shakes too much? If not at least he will be fired……..Safety first!
  • 72. Looking at the tower! X and Z Tower Displacement (m) 43.2 sec 45.5 sec 0.7 m fore-aft side-to-side 0.8 m displacement in 2 sec
  • 73. Looking at the tower! Mx and Mz: moment at the tower base (kNm) 43.2 sec 45.5 sec 105,000 kNm Fore Aft Twisting
  • 74. Conclusions! • 7.7m blade maximum flapwise deformation. • 14,200 kNm flapwise root moment. • 4,800 kNM max shaft torque. • 105.000 kNM tower base moment at the fore aft direction. As the wind turbine “control system” could not avoid the highest loads generated by the peak gust wind speed. The Wind turbine need to be designed to withstand: Possible Solution: If the “control system” reaction gets faster, it will activate pitching before in order to reduce the maximum loads. However this needs to be analyzed after all the extreme cases are taken in to consideration for our turbine design.
  • 75. THANK YOU!! Carlos E. Silva carlos.edmundo.silva@gmail.com Linkedin: https://gr.linkedin.com/in/carlos-silva-1195a22b
  • 76. Wind Power Industry and its Global Players by Carlos E. Silva NTUA Athens, May 2016
  • 77. Introduction Global Energy Powerty! We have serious global problems! • 1 of 7 in the worlds population live without electricity!! (Around 1.3 billion people) • 17%of global population lack access to electricity! The world is melting! • 2015 as the hottest year vs. preindustrial times! • COP21 goal: Keep it lower than +2C. • 2015 is already +1C higher. • 2016 on their way to become 3rd hottest year in a row!
  • 78. Wind Power Industry and its Global Players - Presentation Content 1. Global Wind and Solar Resource 2. Market Development 3. Main Wind Industry Players 4. Manufacturers Competitive Analysis 5. General Conclusions
  • 79. 1.Global Wind and Solar Resource
  • 84. THANK YOU!! Carlos E. Silva csilva.nem@gmail.com Linkedin: https://gr.linkedin.com/in/carlos-silva-1195a22b