PREPARED BY:
NURUL IFFAH
AZLIN
DABNEY
NORDALILAH
ELNIZIANA
AINUL ZAKIRAH
EDU 702
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
(DR JOHAN EDDY LUARAN)
DEFINITION
GOAL
RESEARCH
PROCESSKEY
CHARACTERISTIC
TYPE OF
ETHNOGRAPHIC
RESEARCH
TECHNIQUES
DEFINITION
The study of the cultural patterns
and perspectives of participant in
their natural settings.
To understand the situation about a
phenomena
GOAL
Describe, analyze &
interpret the culture
of a group
Shared beliefs,
behaviors &
language
Culture  set of
attitudes, values,
concepts, beliefs &
practices shared
What researchers
attempt to describe
in research?
Cultural orientation
Cultural know-how
Cultural beliefs
1. PURPOSE OF
THE RESEARCH
2. THE
RELEVANCE
OF THE
PROPOSED
STUDY
3. SITE AND
SAMPLE FOR
THE STUDY
4. ESTABLISH
RAPPORT WITH
COLLABORATORS
5. BEGIN DATA
COLLECTION
6. ANALYZE &
INTERPRET DATA ,
WRITE
ETHNOGRAPHIC
ACCOUNT
The most complex of all research
To obtain as holistic a picture as possible
A holistic perspective of:
 A particular group of society
 Institution
 Setting
 Situation
Conducted in a natural context.
Emphasis on documenting everyday
experiences of individuals by observing
and interviewing
Involves intimate face-to-face interactions
with participants.
Reflects participants’ perspectives and
behaviours.
Data is collected primarily through
fieldwork experiences.
Uses multiple data sourced including both
quantitative and qualitative.
Key tools : indepth interviewing & continual
observation
Within a socio-political and historical
context.
Establishing rapport in a new community
Researcher learn to act naturally (so
people go about their business as usual)
Investigates a small number of cases in
detail.
Uses data analysis that involve the explicit
interpretation of the meanings and
functions of human actions
Interpretations of people’s actions and
behaviours that are uncovered through the
investigation of what they actually do and
the reason for doing it.
Offers a representation or interpretation of
people’s lives and behaviours.
 Built on the points of understanding that
occur between the researcher and
participants.
Thick description
Non-judgmental orientation (researcher
refrain from making value judgement)
 Eg of Title: Inside High School:The student
perspective/Amalan Pengetua Cemerlang
Three major techniques:
1)Triangulation
2)Participant Observation
3)Field notes
Collecting data using many
sources rather than a single one.
Multiple sources:
• - Interviews
• - Observations
• - Artifacts
Multiple informants.
Consistency across sources and
informants creates a stronger
understanding of what is truly
going on.
The researcher is immersed in the research setting in order
to get close to those studied as a way of understanding what
their experiences and activities mean to them.
• Two purposes:
1) To observe the activities, people and physical aspects of a
situation.
2) To engage in activities that provide useful information in a
given situation.
• Make mental notes and record them as soon as possible
after observing.
• Jot down key information.
• Capture key words and phrases without a lot of
explanation.
• Use a mnemonic device to help reconstruct the observed
events.
• Don’t worry about grammar or other rules.
• Trace what you did during the day.
• Avoid the temptation to recreate dialogue
• Describe as completely and accurately as
you can all relevant aspects of the
observation.
• Record your personal reactions (i.e.:
reflective field notes)
• Observe and record everything you
possibly can.
• Observe and look for nothing in particular.
 Historical research is the act of researching the
events that have happened in history. There are
many classes available for this type of research.
 The definition of historical research is finding out
what happened in the past. Research is done by
using old newspapers, old census forms, or other
historical documents. This type of research is done
to understand past events.
 it is a process of critical inquiry into past events in
order to produce an accurate description of those
event. - Wiersma (1986)
Historical research is conducted to
Uncover the unknown
Answer questions
Identify the relationship that the past has to
the present
Record and evaluate accomplishments of
individuals, agencies, or institutions
Aid in understanding the culture in which
we live
STEPS
INVOLVED IN
HISTORICAL
RESARCH
1. Defining the
problem
(including the
formulation of
hypotheses if
appropriate)
2. Locating
relevant sources
of historical
information
3. Summarizing
information
obtained from
historical sources
4. Evaluating
Historical Sources
Examples of historical
studies that have been
published;
• “Shakespeare Under
Different Flags: The Bard
in German Classrooms
from Hitler to Honecker.” 1
• “A Better Crop of Boys
and Girls: The School
Gardening Movement,
1890–1920.” 2
It is better to study in
depth a well-defined
problem so that the
investigator is off to a good
start
Insufficient data include
(certain kinds of
documents, such as
diaries or maps from a
particular period) simply
cannot be located in
historical research.
Historical research
problems should be
clearly and concisely
stated, be manageable,
have a defensible
rationale, and (if
appropriate) investigate a
hypothesized relationship
among variables.
1. Defining the problem
Historical
source
material
can be
grouped
into four
basic
categories:
Documents : It refers to any kind of information that
exists in some type of written or printed form, such as
annual reports, artwork, newspapers and magazines .
Numerical records : It can be any type of numerical data
in printed form such as test scores, attendance figures
and school budgets.
Oral statements : Oral statement is the statements
people make orally such as stories, myths, tales,
legends and songs.
Relics : Relic is any object whose physical or visual
characteristics can provide some information about the
past. Examples include furniture, clothing, buildings,
monuments, or equipment.
It is one prepared by an
individual who was a
participant in or a direct
witness to the event
being described.
Example : Songs
composed by members of
a high school glee club in
the 1930s.
Primary
Source It is a document prepared
by an individual who was
not a direct witness to an
event but who obtained
his or her description of
the event from someone
else.
Example : A magazine
article summarizing
Aristotle’s views on
education.
Secondary
Source
Determining the relevancy
of the particular material
to the question or problem
being investigated
Recording the full
bibliographic data of the
source
Organizing the data one
collects under categories
related to the problem
being studied
Summarizing pertinent
information (important
facts, quotations, and
questions) on note cards
3. Summarizing information obtained from historical sources
Reading and summarizing
historical data is rarely, if ever,
a neat, orderly sequence of steps
to be followed, however.
Often reading and writing are
interspersed
It means that researchers
need to determine if the
contents of the document
are accurate.
Both the accuracy of the
information contained in a
document and the truthfulness
of the author need to be
evaluated.
As with external criticism, several questions
need to be asked in attempting to evaluate the
accuracy of the truthfulness of its author,
example:
a) Was the author present at the event he or she
is describing?
b) Was the author a participant in or an observer
of the event?
c) Was the author emotionally involved in the
event?
d)Was the author competent to describe the
event?
Internal
Criticism
With regard to the contents of the document,
such as :
a) Do the contents make sense?
b) Could the event described have occurred at
that time?
c) Would people have behaved as described?
d) Does the language of the document suggest
a bias of any sort?
GENERALIZATION IN
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
• Historical research is that which utilizes
historical sources like documents to
study events or ideas of the past,
including the philosophy of persons and
group.
• As in all research, researchers who
conduct historical studies should
exercise caution in generalizing from
small or non-representative samples.
GENERALIZATIONINHISTORICALRESEARCH
STRENGHTS OF
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
• It can illuminate the effects of
key interactions within a culture or sub-
culture.
• Researchers can apply scientific
objectivity in attempting to determine
exactly what did happen in the past.
• Throw light on present and future trends.
• Can make use of more categories of
evidence than most other methods (with
the exception of case study and
ethnographic studies).
STRENGHTSOFHISTORICALRESEARCH
LIMITATIONS OF
HISTORICAL RESEARCH
LIMITATIONSOFHISTORICALRESEARCH
• History also depends on valuable
materials which are difficult to
preserve.
• Can only give a fractional view of the
past; its knowledge is never complete
and derived from the surviving records of
a limited number of past events.
• Researchers cannot ensure
representation of the sample.
• Limited to whatever data are available
and excessively relies on secondary
source of data.
Example of historical research
• Lydia Ann Stow: Self-Actualization in a Period
of Transition
– Vivian C. Fox , Worcester State College
• This paper is concerned with a crucial period
of self-actualization in the life of Lydia Ann
Stow (1823–1904)
Example framing of a research question
QUESTIONS
1. What is definition of Relic? Give FOUR example
of Relic.
2. Why is it important to establish rapport with
collaborators or group of society we want to do
our research on?
3. What is referred to as in the technique of
Triangulation?
4. What are the purposes of the researcher being
immersed in the research setting?
5. State ONE disadvantage of historical research.
Ethnography and Historical Research Presentation

Ethnography and Historical Research Presentation

  • 1.
    PREPARED BY: NURUL IFFAH AZLIN DABNEY NORDALILAH ELNIZIANA AINULZAKIRAH EDU 702 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (DR JOHAN EDDY LUARAN)
  • 3.
  • 4.
    DEFINITION The study ofthe cultural patterns and perspectives of participant in their natural settings. To understand the situation about a phenomena
  • 5.
    GOAL Describe, analyze & interpretthe culture of a group Shared beliefs, behaviors & language Culture  set of attitudes, values, concepts, beliefs & practices shared What researchers attempt to describe in research? Cultural orientation Cultural know-how Cultural beliefs
  • 6.
    1. PURPOSE OF THERESEARCH 2. THE RELEVANCE OF THE PROPOSED STUDY 3. SITE AND SAMPLE FOR THE STUDY 4. ESTABLISH RAPPORT WITH COLLABORATORS 5. BEGIN DATA COLLECTION 6. ANALYZE & INTERPRET DATA , WRITE ETHNOGRAPHIC ACCOUNT
  • 7.
    The most complexof all research To obtain as holistic a picture as possible A holistic perspective of:  A particular group of society  Institution  Setting  Situation
  • 8.
    Conducted in anatural context. Emphasis on documenting everyday experiences of individuals by observing and interviewing Involves intimate face-to-face interactions with participants. Reflects participants’ perspectives and behaviours. Data is collected primarily through fieldwork experiences.
  • 9.
    Uses multiple datasourced including both quantitative and qualitative. Key tools : indepth interviewing & continual observation Within a socio-political and historical context. Establishing rapport in a new community Researcher learn to act naturally (so people go about their business as usual)
  • 10.
    Investigates a smallnumber of cases in detail. Uses data analysis that involve the explicit interpretation of the meanings and functions of human actions Interpretations of people’s actions and behaviours that are uncovered through the investigation of what they actually do and the reason for doing it.
  • 11.
    Offers a representationor interpretation of people’s lives and behaviours.  Built on the points of understanding that occur between the researcher and participants. Thick description Non-judgmental orientation (researcher refrain from making value judgement)  Eg of Title: Inside High School:The student perspective/Amalan Pengetua Cemerlang
  • 12.
  • 13.
    Collecting data usingmany sources rather than a single one. Multiple sources: • - Interviews • - Observations • - Artifacts Multiple informants. Consistency across sources and informants creates a stronger understanding of what is truly going on.
  • 14.
    The researcher isimmersed in the research setting in order to get close to those studied as a way of understanding what their experiences and activities mean to them. • Two purposes: 1) To observe the activities, people and physical aspects of a situation. 2) To engage in activities that provide useful information in a given situation.
  • 15.
    • Make mentalnotes and record them as soon as possible after observing. • Jot down key information. • Capture key words and phrases without a lot of explanation. • Use a mnemonic device to help reconstruct the observed events. • Don’t worry about grammar or other rules. • Trace what you did during the day. • Avoid the temptation to recreate dialogue
  • 16.
    • Describe ascompletely and accurately as you can all relevant aspects of the observation. • Record your personal reactions (i.e.: reflective field notes) • Observe and record everything you possibly can. • Observe and look for nothing in particular.
  • 18.
     Historical researchis the act of researching the events that have happened in history. There are many classes available for this type of research.  The definition of historical research is finding out what happened in the past. Research is done by using old newspapers, old census forms, or other historical documents. This type of research is done to understand past events.  it is a process of critical inquiry into past events in order to produce an accurate description of those event. - Wiersma (1986)
  • 19.
    Historical research isconducted to Uncover the unknown Answer questions Identify the relationship that the past has to the present Record and evaluate accomplishments of individuals, agencies, or institutions Aid in understanding the culture in which we live
  • 21.
    STEPS INVOLVED IN HISTORICAL RESARCH 1. Definingthe problem (including the formulation of hypotheses if appropriate) 2. Locating relevant sources of historical information 3. Summarizing information obtained from historical sources 4. Evaluating Historical Sources
  • 22.
    Examples of historical studiesthat have been published; • “Shakespeare Under Different Flags: The Bard in German Classrooms from Hitler to Honecker.” 1 • “A Better Crop of Boys and Girls: The School Gardening Movement, 1890–1920.” 2 It is better to study in depth a well-defined problem so that the investigator is off to a good start Insufficient data include (certain kinds of documents, such as diaries or maps from a particular period) simply cannot be located in historical research. Historical research problems should be clearly and concisely stated, be manageable, have a defensible rationale, and (if appropriate) investigate a hypothesized relationship among variables. 1. Defining the problem
  • 23.
    Historical source material can be grouped into four basic categories: Documents: It refers to any kind of information that exists in some type of written or printed form, such as annual reports, artwork, newspapers and magazines . Numerical records : It can be any type of numerical data in printed form such as test scores, attendance figures and school budgets. Oral statements : Oral statement is the statements people make orally such as stories, myths, tales, legends and songs. Relics : Relic is any object whose physical or visual characteristics can provide some information about the past. Examples include furniture, clothing, buildings, monuments, or equipment.
  • 24.
    It is oneprepared by an individual who was a participant in or a direct witness to the event being described. Example : Songs composed by members of a high school glee club in the 1930s. Primary Source It is a document prepared by an individual who was not a direct witness to an event but who obtained his or her description of the event from someone else. Example : A magazine article summarizing Aristotle’s views on education. Secondary Source
  • 25.
    Determining the relevancy ofthe particular material to the question or problem being investigated Recording the full bibliographic data of the source Organizing the data one collects under categories related to the problem being studied Summarizing pertinent information (important facts, quotations, and questions) on note cards 3. Summarizing information obtained from historical sources Reading and summarizing historical data is rarely, if ever, a neat, orderly sequence of steps to be followed, however. Often reading and writing are interspersed
  • 27.
    It means thatresearchers need to determine if the contents of the document are accurate. Both the accuracy of the information contained in a document and the truthfulness of the author need to be evaluated. As with external criticism, several questions need to be asked in attempting to evaluate the accuracy of the truthfulness of its author, example: a) Was the author present at the event he or she is describing? b) Was the author a participant in or an observer of the event? c) Was the author emotionally involved in the event? d)Was the author competent to describe the event? Internal Criticism With regard to the contents of the document, such as : a) Do the contents make sense? b) Could the event described have occurred at that time? c) Would people have behaved as described? d) Does the language of the document suggest a bias of any sort?
  • 28.
  • 29.
    • Historical researchis that which utilizes historical sources like documents to study events or ideas of the past, including the philosophy of persons and group. • As in all research, researchers who conduct historical studies should exercise caution in generalizing from small or non-representative samples. GENERALIZATIONINHISTORICALRESEARCH
  • 30.
  • 31.
    • It canilluminate the effects of key interactions within a culture or sub- culture. • Researchers can apply scientific objectivity in attempting to determine exactly what did happen in the past. • Throw light on present and future trends. • Can make use of more categories of evidence than most other methods (with the exception of case study and ethnographic studies). STRENGHTSOFHISTORICALRESEARCH
  • 32.
  • 33.
    LIMITATIONSOFHISTORICALRESEARCH • History alsodepends on valuable materials which are difficult to preserve. • Can only give a fractional view of the past; its knowledge is never complete and derived from the surviving records of a limited number of past events. • Researchers cannot ensure representation of the sample. • Limited to whatever data are available and excessively relies on secondary source of data.
  • 34.
  • 35.
    • Lydia AnnStow: Self-Actualization in a Period of Transition – Vivian C. Fox , Worcester State College • This paper is concerned with a crucial period of self-actualization in the life of Lydia Ann Stow (1823–1904)
  • 36.
    Example framing ofa research question
  • 37.
    QUESTIONS 1. What isdefinition of Relic? Give FOUR example of Relic. 2. Why is it important to establish rapport with collaborators or group of society we want to do our research on? 3. What is referred to as in the technique of Triangulation? 4. What are the purposes of the researcher being immersed in the research setting? 5. State ONE disadvantage of historical research.