 Did interviews at Gibbs Court in Capstone
 Interviewed three different people
 Asked questions regarding;
   socioeconomic status
   What political party they affiliated with
   Place of origin
   What social groups they were in(greek life)
I looked at the people I
 interviewed and observed
 the people they hung out
 with.
I observed their clothing
What technology they had
 My view before the research was that college
  students now-a-days believe very similar
  political views as their parents did. Only one
  of my subjects adhered to this.
 It seemed fair to assume raised democrat
  one would be a democrat and vice versa. But
  at least in these subjects that was not always
  true.
 My hypothesis of place of origin did
  seem to adhere to what I believe prior
  to the research.
 The individuals that I interviewed from
  the north were either democrats or
  their parents were, and the individual
  from the south was a republican.
 I came into observing my subjects socioeconomic
  statuses by observing what clothes each person wore
  and what technology they had.
 The individuals that did not wear name brand clothes
  had parents that were democrats or the person
  themselves were democrats. It was not surprising that
  the individual I interviewed last, who wore more
  alternative clothes that were not as expensive was a
  democrat
 From my own experience in Greek life
  on USC’s campus I have noticed trends
  in political affiliation. People in a
  fraternity or sorority tend to be
  republicans and more conservative.
 My research and interviews reinforced
  my experience.
 In my research I tried to connect the
 different variables that influenced their
 political ideologies.
 I think I portrayed what the world
 around these individuals has done to
 their beliefs whether it is their place of
 origin or environment they grew up in.

Ethnography presentation

  • 2.
     Did interviewsat Gibbs Court in Capstone  Interviewed three different people  Asked questions regarding;  socioeconomic status  What political party they affiliated with  Place of origin  What social groups they were in(greek life)
  • 3.
    I looked atthe people I interviewed and observed the people they hung out with. I observed their clothing What technology they had
  • 4.
     My viewbefore the research was that college students now-a-days believe very similar political views as their parents did. Only one of my subjects adhered to this.  It seemed fair to assume raised democrat one would be a democrat and vice versa. But at least in these subjects that was not always true.
  • 5.
     My hypothesisof place of origin did seem to adhere to what I believe prior to the research.  The individuals that I interviewed from the north were either democrats or their parents were, and the individual from the south was a republican.
  • 6.
     I cameinto observing my subjects socioeconomic statuses by observing what clothes each person wore and what technology they had.  The individuals that did not wear name brand clothes had parents that were democrats or the person themselves were democrats. It was not surprising that the individual I interviewed last, who wore more alternative clothes that were not as expensive was a democrat
  • 7.
     From myown experience in Greek life on USC’s campus I have noticed trends in political affiliation. People in a fraternity or sorority tend to be republicans and more conservative.  My research and interviews reinforced my experience.
  • 8.
     In myresearch I tried to connect the different variables that influenced their political ideologies.  I think I portrayed what the world around these individuals has done to their beliefs whether it is their place of origin or environment they grew up in.