Ethics Matters: Understanding the Ethics of Public Speaking
Sections 4.1-4.2
Ethics Today & The Ethics Pyramid
The Ethics PyramidA model developed by Elspeth Tilley, proposes three basic concepts: intent, means, and ends.
IntentionSimilarly, an ethical listener keeps an open mind, listening to the speaker before making judgments.One way to assess intent is to seek feedback from others; how ethical do they think a behavior or a remark is?A second way to assess intent is to check out existing codes of ethics.Third, consider whether a behavior is beneficial for the majority, or whether you would approve of the same behavior from someone else.Sometimes people can engage in unethical behavior unintentionally; plagiarism often occurs when a speaker uses a phrase or content, forgetting that he or she read it in someone else’s work.
MeansMeans are the tools or behaviors we use to achieve a desired outcome.We have choices about which means to employ in persuading others.Threats and other forms of manipulation are unethical behaviors.Making a respectful request is ethical.
EndsThe outcomes you hope to achieve, say McCroskey, Wrench, and Richmond (2002).Some end results could be good for the source (speaker) but bad for the receiver (listener). An example would be persuading audience members to buy something they don’t actually want.Your goal should be chosen according to ethical standards you and your audience expect from each other.
Why the Pyramid MattersUnderstanding ethics is a matter of balancing all three parts of the ethical pyramid.Tilley recommends testing the ethics of a given behavior by asking:“Have I discussed the ethicality of the behavior with others and come to a general consensus that the behavior is ethical?”“Does the behavior adhere to known codes of ethics?”“Would I be happy if the outcomes of the behavior were reversed and applied to me?”
Section 4.3
Ethics in Public Speaking
The NCA Credo for Ethical CommunicationA statement of their values about ethics in human communication.
Nine Principles of Ethical Communication
Principle 1Truthfulness, accuracy, honesty, and reason.
Principle 2Freedom of expression, diversity of perspective, and tolerance of dissent.
Principle 3Understanding of and respect for other communicators before passing judgment.
Principle 4Access to communication resources and opportunities for the purpose of promoting the well-being of families, communities, and society.
Principle 5Communication climates of caring, mutual understanding, and respect.
Principle 6Condemnation of distortion, intimidation, coercion, violence intolerance, hate speech, violence, or other behavior that degrades people.
Principle 7Support for the expression of personal convictions in pursuit of fairness and justice.
Principle 8Advocate sharing information, opinions, and feelings while respecting privacy and confidentiality.
Principle 9Responsibility for the short- and long-term cons ...
INTRODUCTION THINKING ETHICALLY A Framework for Moral Decisio.docxnormanibarber20063
INTRODUCTION:
THINKING ETHICALLY A Framework for Moral Decision Making
***This article updates several previous pieces from Issues in Ethics by Manuel Velasquez - Dirksen Professor of Business Ethics at Santa Clara University and former Center director - and Claire Andre, associate Center director. "Thinking Ethically" is based on a framework developed by the authors in collaboration with Center Director Thomas Shanks, S.J., Presidential Professor of Ethics and the Common Good Michael J. Meyer, and others. The framework is used as the basis for many programs and presentations at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics.
TAKEN FROM: http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/framework.html
Moral issues greet us each morning in the newspaper, confront us in the memos on our desks, nag us from our children's soccer fields, and bid us good night on the evening news. We are bombarded daily with questions about the justice of our foreign policy, the morality of medical technologies that can prolong our lives, the rights of animals or perhaps the fairness of our children's teachers dealing with diverse students in their classrooms.
Dealing with these moral issues is often perplexing. How, exactly, should we think through an ethical issue? What questions should we ask? What factors should we consider?
WHAT IS ETHICS?
Simply stated, ethics refers to standards of behavior that tell us how human beings ought to act in the many situations in which they find themselves-as friends, parents, children, citizens, businesspeople, teachers, professionals, and so on.
According to The National Institute of Health: “Ethics seeks to determine what a person should do, or the best course of action, and provides reasons why. It also helps people decide how to behave and treat one another, and what kinds of communities would be good to live in.”
“Bioethics is a subfield of ethics that explores ethical questions related to the life sciences. Bioethical analysis helps people make decisions about their behavior and about policy questions that governments, organizations, and communities must face when they consider how best to use new biomedical knowledge and innovation”.
WHAT ETHICS IS NOT:
• Ethics is not the same as feelings. Feelings provide important information for our ethical choices. Some people have highly developed habits that make them feel bad when they do something wrong, but many people feel good even though they are doing something wrong. And often our feelings will tell us it is uncomfortable to do the right thing if it is hard.
Ethics is not religion. Many people are not religious, but ethics applies to everyone. Most religions do advocate high ethical standards but sometimes do not address all the types of problems we face.
• Ethics is not following the law. A good system of law does incorporate many ethical standards, but law can deviate from what is ethical. Law can become ethically corrupt, as some totalitarian regimes have made it..
A Framework for Thinking EthicallyThis document is designed as a.docxransayo
A Framework for Thinking Ethically
This document is designed as an introduction to thinking ethically. We all have an image of our better selves-of how we are when we act ethically or are "at our best." We probably also have an image of what an ethical community, an ethical business, an ethical government, or an ethical society should be. Ethics really has to do with all these levels-acting ethically as individuals, creating ethical organizations and governments, and making our society as a whole ethical in the way it treats everyone.What is Ethics?
Simply stated, ethics refers to standards of behavior that tell us how human beings ought to act in the many situations in which they find themselves-as friends, parents, children, citizens, businesspeople, teachers, professionals, and so on.
It is helpful to identify what ethics is NOT:
· Ethics is not the same as feelings. Feelings provide important information for our ethical choices. Some people have highly developed habits that make them feel bad when they do something wrong, but many people feel good even though they are doing something wrong. And often our feelings will tell us it is uncomfortable to do the right thing if it is hard.
· Ethics is not religion. Many people are not religious, but ethics applies to everyone. Most religions do advocate high ethical standards but sometimes do not address all the types of problems we face.
· Ethics is not following the law. A good system of law does incorporate many ethical standards, but law can deviate from what is ethical. Law can become ethically corrupt, as some totalitarian regimes have made it. Law can be a function of power alone and designed to serve the interests of narrow groups. Law may have a difficult time designing or enforcing standards in some important areas, and may be slow to address new problems.
· Ethics is not following culturally accepted norms. Some cultures are quite ethical, but others become corrupt -or blind to certain ethical concerns (as the United States was to slavery before the Civil War). "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" is not a satisfactory ethical standard.
· Ethics is not science. Social and natural science can provide important data to help us make better ethical choices. But science alone does not tell us what we ought to do. Science may provide an explanation for what humans are like. But ethics provides reasons for how humans ought to act. And just because something is scientifically or technologically possible, it may not be ethical to do it.
Why Identifying Ethical Standards is Hard
There are two fundamental problems in identifying the ethical standards we are to follow:
1. On what do we base our ethical standards?
2. How do those standards get applied to specific situations we face?
If our ethics are not based on feelings, religion, law, accepted social practice, or science, what are they based on? Many philosophers and ethicists have helped us answer this critical question. They have suggested .
INTRODUCTION THINKING ETHICALLY A Framework for Moral Decisio.docxnormanibarber20063
INTRODUCTION:
THINKING ETHICALLY A Framework for Moral Decision Making
***This article updates several previous pieces from Issues in Ethics by Manuel Velasquez - Dirksen Professor of Business Ethics at Santa Clara University and former Center director - and Claire Andre, associate Center director. "Thinking Ethically" is based on a framework developed by the authors in collaboration with Center Director Thomas Shanks, S.J., Presidential Professor of Ethics and the Common Good Michael J. Meyer, and others. The framework is used as the basis for many programs and presentations at the Markkula Center for Applied Ethics.
TAKEN FROM: http://www.scu.edu/ethics/practicing/decision/framework.html
Moral issues greet us each morning in the newspaper, confront us in the memos on our desks, nag us from our children's soccer fields, and bid us good night on the evening news. We are bombarded daily with questions about the justice of our foreign policy, the morality of medical technologies that can prolong our lives, the rights of animals or perhaps the fairness of our children's teachers dealing with diverse students in their classrooms.
Dealing with these moral issues is often perplexing. How, exactly, should we think through an ethical issue? What questions should we ask? What factors should we consider?
WHAT IS ETHICS?
Simply stated, ethics refers to standards of behavior that tell us how human beings ought to act in the many situations in which they find themselves-as friends, parents, children, citizens, businesspeople, teachers, professionals, and so on.
According to The National Institute of Health: “Ethics seeks to determine what a person should do, or the best course of action, and provides reasons why. It also helps people decide how to behave and treat one another, and what kinds of communities would be good to live in.”
“Bioethics is a subfield of ethics that explores ethical questions related to the life sciences. Bioethical analysis helps people make decisions about their behavior and about policy questions that governments, organizations, and communities must face when they consider how best to use new biomedical knowledge and innovation”.
WHAT ETHICS IS NOT:
• Ethics is not the same as feelings. Feelings provide important information for our ethical choices. Some people have highly developed habits that make them feel bad when they do something wrong, but many people feel good even though they are doing something wrong. And often our feelings will tell us it is uncomfortable to do the right thing if it is hard.
Ethics is not religion. Many people are not religious, but ethics applies to everyone. Most religions do advocate high ethical standards but sometimes do not address all the types of problems we face.
• Ethics is not following the law. A good system of law does incorporate many ethical standards, but law can deviate from what is ethical. Law can become ethically corrupt, as some totalitarian regimes have made it..
A Framework for Thinking EthicallyThis document is designed as a.docxransayo
A Framework for Thinking Ethically
This document is designed as an introduction to thinking ethically. We all have an image of our better selves-of how we are when we act ethically or are "at our best." We probably also have an image of what an ethical community, an ethical business, an ethical government, or an ethical society should be. Ethics really has to do with all these levels-acting ethically as individuals, creating ethical organizations and governments, and making our society as a whole ethical in the way it treats everyone.What is Ethics?
Simply stated, ethics refers to standards of behavior that tell us how human beings ought to act in the many situations in which they find themselves-as friends, parents, children, citizens, businesspeople, teachers, professionals, and so on.
It is helpful to identify what ethics is NOT:
· Ethics is not the same as feelings. Feelings provide important information for our ethical choices. Some people have highly developed habits that make them feel bad when they do something wrong, but many people feel good even though they are doing something wrong. And often our feelings will tell us it is uncomfortable to do the right thing if it is hard.
· Ethics is not religion. Many people are not religious, but ethics applies to everyone. Most religions do advocate high ethical standards but sometimes do not address all the types of problems we face.
· Ethics is not following the law. A good system of law does incorporate many ethical standards, but law can deviate from what is ethical. Law can become ethically corrupt, as some totalitarian regimes have made it. Law can be a function of power alone and designed to serve the interests of narrow groups. Law may have a difficult time designing or enforcing standards in some important areas, and may be slow to address new problems.
· Ethics is not following culturally accepted norms. Some cultures are quite ethical, but others become corrupt -or blind to certain ethical concerns (as the United States was to slavery before the Civil War). "When in Rome, do as the Romans do" is not a satisfactory ethical standard.
· Ethics is not science. Social and natural science can provide important data to help us make better ethical choices. But science alone does not tell us what we ought to do. Science may provide an explanation for what humans are like. But ethics provides reasons for how humans ought to act. And just because something is scientifically or technologically possible, it may not be ethical to do it.
Why Identifying Ethical Standards is Hard
There are two fundamental problems in identifying the ethical standards we are to follow:
1. On what do we base our ethical standards?
2. How do those standards get applied to specific situations we face?
If our ethics are not based on feelings, religion, law, accepted social practice, or science, what are they based on? Many philosophers and ethicists have helped us answer this critical question. They have suggested .
Almost anybody you can ask has their opinion about everything. Their opinion may be true, untrue, proven or in doubt. It might be personal, conditioned by family upbringing, determined by situations, social background, culture, religion, or politics. But the fact remains that everybody has already made-up their minds about most of the things in life. These opinions are our schemas. For the purpose of simplicity, schemas can be described in the context of this article as a framework of interpretations of anything. In other words, everybody have their own framework of interpretations. If everybody have their own framework of interpretations, then open-mindedness is definitely not prevalent.
9.5 Moral TheoriesAll moral claims are grounded in some moral th.docxransayo
9.5 Moral Theories
All moral claims are grounded in some moral theory. It is the nature of such claims that they are based on a system of beliefs about what is right and wrong, just and unjust.
The table below lists a handful of the moral theories you are most likely to encounter in ethical arguments today. It’s important to note that each one has its own strengths and weaknesses.
Moral theories give you general guidelines, but you still usually have to apply moral reasoning in individual cases to test them out. For example, none of these theories explicitly claim that killing is wrong. The theories are more about how you would ground your claim that killing is wrong.
Moral theories are also not mutually exclusive. The argument that killing is wrong could be grounded in all of these theories.
Whether they know it or not, everyone has a moral theory. It is inescapable. Even if their moral theory is that there are no morals, that still represents a moral theory. But not all moral theories are equal—some hold up to critical thinking better than others.
You may see wisdom in all of these perspectives, or you may strongly identify with a single one. Regardless, it's important for you to recognize the potential weaknesses in any moral theory you favor, and it's helpful for you to understand why others find legitimacy in the moral theories they employ.
Theory
Criticisms
Kantian Ethics
· Immanuel Kant put forth the categorical imperative, which states that you should only act on moral principles that you would be willing to turn into universal laws mandating that everyone act the same way.
· This is a version of the question, “How would you like it if everyone did that?”
Any two people who want to get married should be able to.
· This theory is so absolute that it sometimes goes against moral common sense.
It’s wrong to kiss my spouse because I would not like it if everyone kissed my spouse.
Utilitarianism
· The morally right course of action is the one that will produce the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people.
· The only thing that matters is the consequences of the action, not the intentions behind the action (the ends justify the means).
· Ignores people’s rights, duties, and intentions.
· Could be used to justify an act that most would consider morally wrong because it inflicts harm on one person unjustly, even if it brings great happiness to many others.
It’s okay to steal money from my neighbor and take my family on a vacation, because then my whole family would be happy, and only my neighbor would be harmed.
Ethical Egoism
· Doing whatever is best for your own interests or would make you happy.
· This is not necessarily the same thing as doing whatever you want in the moment, because that might not be in your best interests in the long term.
· Can be used to justify terrible actions.
Ethical Altruism
· Doing whatever is best for others or would bring the greatest amount of happiness to people besides yourself.
· Some.
Audience Analysis Sections 16.1What Is a.docxrock73
Audience Analysis
Sections 16.1
What Is an Audience Analysis?
&
Why Conduct an Audience Analysis?
Public Speaking as
Shared ActivityThe interaction between speaker and audience; speakers jointly create meaning with audiences.Public speaking is an audience-centered activity in which the speaker considers the needs and interest of the audience.Audience analysis is the process of gathering information about the people in the audience so a speaker can understand their needs, values, and expectations.Find an appropriate way to acknowledge and greet your audience.
Choose a
Worthwhile TopicYour topic should reflect regard for the audience; audiences do not want to listen to a speech that is too simple or a topic they already know a great deal about.Many students are tempted to choose an easy topic or a topic they already know a great deal about because it decreases their own workload rather than engaging audience interest.Choose a topic that is interesting enough for you to research and your audience to listen to.
Clarity is ImportantUse straightforward vocabulary and avoid convoluted sentences.
The Risk of ControversyControversial topics are topics about which people disagree.Many controversial topics confront people’s fundamental and closely-held values.There are often more than two perspectives on important controversial topics.How you treat your audience is just as important as how you treat your topic.
Adapting to
Audience NeedsAudiences differ in their perspectives and readiness to accept new ideas.Even in a homogeneous audience, an audience composed of people who are similar to one another, different listeners will understand the same ideas in different ways.Every member of every audience has his or her own frame of reference generated by their unique life experience.
Categories of
Life Experiences Demographic information refers to gender, age range, marital status, race and ethnicity, all of which impact an audience’s perspectives and needs.Socioeconomic status refers to characteristics including income, wealth, level of education, and occupational prestige.Psychographic information involves the beliefs, attitudes, values, and opinions that are most often difficult to predict.
Respecting your audience means that you avoid offending, excluding, or trivializing the beliefs and values they hold.
DiversityRefers not only to racial and ethnic groups, but also to religion, sexual orientation, body size, and physical and mental ability.
Respecting Diverse AudiencesBeing mindful of diversity means being respectful of all people and avoiding racism, ethnocentrism, stereotyping, sexism, ageism, elitism, and other assumptions.It’s easy to assume that people from a given culture are just alike, but they’re not; their social roles, life experiences, and circumstances vary.Frame of reference may be difficult to predict; for instance, we might assume that a successful businessman is primarily interested in p ...
Communication & Challenging Conversations PCMA 2014 MontrealMcKinley Solutions
Challenging conversations are those everyday interactions that significantly affect you and others. They differ from ordinary dialogue because the opinions of the participants may vary, the emotions are high and the stakes are significant. The way in which you deal with these important discussions can have a positive or negative result and can change the course of your relationship. Learn the tools to handle life’s most difficult conversations, say what’s on your mind, and achieve positive outcomes. Challenging confrontations consists of face-to-face accountability discussions where someone has disappointed you and you talk to him or her directly. When handled well, the problem is resolved and the relationship benefits. New research demonstrates that these disappointments aren’t just irritating – they’re costly, sapping organizational performance by 20 to 50 percent. Learn to permanently resolve failed promises and missed deadlines, transform broken rules and bad behaviors into productive accountability and strengthen relationships while solving problems. At the heart of mastering these challenges is the ability to engage in and maintain dialogue. Masters of dialogue create an atmosphere where everyone feels safe about adding his or her own views to the “shared pool” of ideas being expressed. The skills are critical to the success of all leadership roles. Active participants will increase their awareness of the challenging conversations and confrontations as well as hands-on tips and techniques on how to manage them effectively.
Learning Objectives:
1. How do I deal spontaneously with challenging conversations (where opinions vary, emotions are high and stakes are significant)?
2. How can I resolve problems where I have been disappointed by employee accountability and avoid unnecessary costs and strained relationships?
3. How do I develop and environment where people can carry on a dialogue and feel safe expressing their own view.
Running Head Public Speaking Class1Public Speaking Class3.docxtoltonkendal
Running Head: Public Speaking Class 1
Public Speaking Class 3
Each of the two chapters offers very important information. This information shall be summarized into the five most important items derived from each of the chapters as is done below:
Chapter Three: The Importance of Listening
· When we hear, we choose to filter out the sounds that we are of less meaning to us and pay attention to the more meaningful sounds.
· When we listen, we are motivated by a purpose to exert effort to pay attention to something, such as when working, something which we do only at given times.
· For a person to listen critically, an activity which goes hand in hand with critical thinking, he/she engages in a systematic thought process to determine whether the message received is sensible enough.
· Some of the main ways for developing critical listening are uncovering assumptions, recognizing the differences between facts and opinions, relating new ideas to old ones, being open to new ideas and relying on reason and common sense (Wrench, Goding, Johnson, & Attias, The Importance of Listening, 2011).
· To listen ethically entails giving the speaker a fair opportunity to speak make himself clearly understood, and being mindful and respectful of him as well.
Chapter Four: Ethics Matter: Understanding the Ethics of Public Speaking
· Based on the ethics pyramid, the three basic concepts of ethics in public speaking are ends (what a person hopes to achieve), means (how a person intends to achieve the outcome he desires) and intention.
· For ethics to be exercised efficiently in public speaking, the speaker should be able to strike a balance between these three basic concepts.
· Nine principles of ethical communication basically define the moral considerations that are to be made when engaging in communication under public speaking.
· What each of these principles have in common is that they acknowledge that while it is necessary for public speakers to speak up/communicate whenever they feel it is necessary, they should do so while considering the impact of their communication to others.
· Free speech, which is the right that one has to freely express ideas or information without having to worry about government restrictions or any other limitations as guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution is of importance to a public speaker since public speaking generally entails the passage of information and ideas to the public allowing them to consider multiple points of view (Wrench, Goding, Johnson, & Attias, Ethics Matters: Understanding the Ethics of Public Speaking, 2011).
REFERENCES
Wrench, Goding, Johnson, & Attias. (2011). Ethics Matters: Understanding the Ethics of Public Speaking. In Stand Up, Speak Out: The Practice and Ethics of Public Speaking. Flatworld Knowledge.
Wrench, Goding, Johnson, & Attias. (2011). The Importance of Listening. In Stand Up, Seak Out: The Practice and Ethics of Public Speaking. Flatworld Knowledge.
...
Communication Theory 2713-850Midterm Study Guide (up to 150 pts).docxcargillfilberto
Communication Theory 2713-850
Midterm Study Guide (up to 150 pts)
· Time Limit - 120 Minutes. Multiple Attempts Allowed (Note: If you complete it multiple times, then the score would be averaged)
· 50 questions, multiple choice. Look for the most suitable answer.
· Chapters 1-4;7-9;13
Academic Integrity
Academic Integrity Academic misconduct is any act which improperly affects the evaluation of a student’s academic performance or achievement. Misconduct occurs when the student either knows or reasonably should know that the act constitutes misconduct. Cheating is strictly prohibited at the University of Oklahoma, because it devalues the degree you are working hard to get. As a member of the OU community it is your responsibility to protect your educational investment by knowing and following the rules. For specific definitions on what constitutes cheating, review the Student’s Guide to Academic Integrity at http://integrity.ou.edu/students_guide.html.To be successful in this class, all work on exams and quizzes must be yours and yours alone; unless otherwise specifically instructed. You may not receive outside help.
Reasonable Accommodation Policy
Students requiring academic accommodation should contact the Disability Resource Center for assistance at (405) 325-3852 or TDD: (405) 325-4173. For more information please see the Disability Resource Center website http://www.ou.edu/drc/home.html Any student in this course who has a disability that may prevent him or her from fully demonstrating his or her abilities should contact me personally as soon as possible so we can discuss accommodations necessary to ensure full participation and facilitate your educational opportunities.
Chapter 1
What is a theory and what does it do? What is communication? What is communication theory?
Key names and terms: Judee Burgoon, Ernest Bormann
Theory - A set of systematic, informed hunches about the way things work.
Communication - The relational process of creating and interpreting messages that elicit a response.
Text - A record of a message that can be analyzed by others; for example, a book, film, photograph, or any transcript or recording of a speech or broadcast.
Polysemic - A quality of symbols that means they are open to multiple interpretations.
Chapter 2
What is an objective approach? What is an interpretive approach? Objective or interpretive: Why is it important? Ways of knowing: Discovering truth or creating multiple realities?
Key names and terms: Stanley Deetz
Behavioral scientist - A scholar who applies the scientific method to describe, predict, and explain recurring forms of human behavior.
Rhetorician - A scholar who studies the ways in which symbolic forms can be used to identify with people, or to persuade them toward a certain point of view.
Objective approach - The assumption that truth is singular and is accessible through unbiased sensory observation; committed to uncovering cause-and-effect relationships.
Resonance pri.
Communication Theory 2713-850Midterm Study Guide (up to 150 pts).docxdrandy1
Communication Theory 2713-850
Midterm Study Guide (up to 150 pts)
· Time Limit - 120 Minutes. Multiple Attempts Allowed (Note: If you complete it multiple times, then the score would be averaged)
· 50 questions, multiple choice. Look for the most suitable answer.
· Chapters 1-4;7-9;13
Academic Integrity
Academic Integrity Academic misconduct is any act which improperly affects the evaluation of a student’s academic performance or achievement. Misconduct occurs when the student either knows or reasonably should know that the act constitutes misconduct. Cheating is strictly prohibited at the University of Oklahoma, because it devalues the degree you are working hard to get. As a member of the OU community it is your responsibility to protect your educational investment by knowing and following the rules. For specific definitions on what constitutes cheating, review the Student’s Guide to Academic Integrity at http://integrity.ou.edu/students_guide.html.To be successful in this class, all work on exams and quizzes must be yours and yours alone; unless otherwise specifically instructed. You may not receive outside help.
Reasonable Accommodation Policy
Students requiring academic accommodation should contact the Disability Resource Center for assistance at (405) 325-3852 or TDD: (405) 325-4173. For more information please see the Disability Resource Center website http://www.ou.edu/drc/home.html Any student in this course who has a disability that may prevent him or her from fully demonstrating his or her abilities should contact me personally as soon as possible so we can discuss accommodations necessary to ensure full participation and facilitate your educational opportunities.
Chapter 1
What is a theory and what does it do? What is communication? What is communication theory?
Key names and terms: Judee Burgoon, Ernest Bormann
Theory - A set of systematic, informed hunches about the way things work.
Communication - The relational process of creating and interpreting messages that elicit a response.
Text - A record of a message that can be analyzed by others; for example, a book, film, photograph, or any transcript or recording of a speech or broadcast.
Polysemic - A quality of symbols that means they are open to multiple interpretations.
Chapter 2
What is an objective approach? What is an interpretive approach? Objective or interpretive: Why is it important? Ways of knowing: Discovering truth or creating multiple realities?
Key names and terms: Stanley Deetz
Behavioral scientist - A scholar who applies the scientific method to describe, predict, and explain recurring forms of human behavior.
Rhetorician - A scholar who studies the ways in which symbolic forms can be used to identify with people, or to persuade them toward a certain point of view.
Objective approach - The assumption that truth is singular and is accessible through unbiased sensory observation; committed to uncovering cause-and-effect relationships.
Resonance pri.
The Assignment (3–5 pages)Complete a leadership development plan .docxSANSKAR20
The Assignment (3–5 pages):
Complete a leadership development plan that includes the following:
Section I
Your current strengths and weaknesses as a leader
Opportunities and threats to developing and further enhancing your leadership capacity as a change agent (e.g., social change)
Justify your responses with specific examples.
Section II
Using the “Public Health Leadership Competency Framework,” developed by the National Public Health Leadership Network as a guide (refer to the article posted in the weekly Resources), describe a leadership plan to develop the following over the next 3–5 years. Include the following:
Your core transformational competencies (visionary leadership, sense of mission, effective change agent)
Political competencies (political processes, negotiation, ethics and power, marketing and education)
Organizational competencies
Team-building competencies
Personality factors
Crisis abilities
Justify your rationale for your selections.
.
The assignment consist of a Case Study. I have attached the Case St.docxSANSKAR20
The assignment consist of a Case Study. I have attached the Case Study to be researched. Please answer all of the questions and be specific with all requirements for the Case Study such as the format, the amount of pages the paper is required to be written, the sources and references, etc... Please follow all directions that are highlighted in the attachment.
.
More Related Content
Similar to Ethics Matters Understanding the Ethics of Public Speakin.docx
Almost anybody you can ask has their opinion about everything. Their opinion may be true, untrue, proven or in doubt. It might be personal, conditioned by family upbringing, determined by situations, social background, culture, religion, or politics. But the fact remains that everybody has already made-up their minds about most of the things in life. These opinions are our schemas. For the purpose of simplicity, schemas can be described in the context of this article as a framework of interpretations of anything. In other words, everybody have their own framework of interpretations. If everybody have their own framework of interpretations, then open-mindedness is definitely not prevalent.
9.5 Moral TheoriesAll moral claims are grounded in some moral th.docxransayo
9.5 Moral Theories
All moral claims are grounded in some moral theory. It is the nature of such claims that they are based on a system of beliefs about what is right and wrong, just and unjust.
The table below lists a handful of the moral theories you are most likely to encounter in ethical arguments today. It’s important to note that each one has its own strengths and weaknesses.
Moral theories give you general guidelines, but you still usually have to apply moral reasoning in individual cases to test them out. For example, none of these theories explicitly claim that killing is wrong. The theories are more about how you would ground your claim that killing is wrong.
Moral theories are also not mutually exclusive. The argument that killing is wrong could be grounded in all of these theories.
Whether they know it or not, everyone has a moral theory. It is inescapable. Even if their moral theory is that there are no morals, that still represents a moral theory. But not all moral theories are equal—some hold up to critical thinking better than others.
You may see wisdom in all of these perspectives, or you may strongly identify with a single one. Regardless, it's important for you to recognize the potential weaknesses in any moral theory you favor, and it's helpful for you to understand why others find legitimacy in the moral theories they employ.
Theory
Criticisms
Kantian Ethics
· Immanuel Kant put forth the categorical imperative, which states that you should only act on moral principles that you would be willing to turn into universal laws mandating that everyone act the same way.
· This is a version of the question, “How would you like it if everyone did that?”
Any two people who want to get married should be able to.
· This theory is so absolute that it sometimes goes against moral common sense.
It’s wrong to kiss my spouse because I would not like it if everyone kissed my spouse.
Utilitarianism
· The morally right course of action is the one that will produce the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people.
· The only thing that matters is the consequences of the action, not the intentions behind the action (the ends justify the means).
· Ignores people’s rights, duties, and intentions.
· Could be used to justify an act that most would consider morally wrong because it inflicts harm on one person unjustly, even if it brings great happiness to many others.
It’s okay to steal money from my neighbor and take my family on a vacation, because then my whole family would be happy, and only my neighbor would be harmed.
Ethical Egoism
· Doing whatever is best for your own interests or would make you happy.
· This is not necessarily the same thing as doing whatever you want in the moment, because that might not be in your best interests in the long term.
· Can be used to justify terrible actions.
Ethical Altruism
· Doing whatever is best for others or would bring the greatest amount of happiness to people besides yourself.
· Some.
Audience Analysis Sections 16.1What Is a.docxrock73
Audience Analysis
Sections 16.1
What Is an Audience Analysis?
&
Why Conduct an Audience Analysis?
Public Speaking as
Shared ActivityThe interaction between speaker and audience; speakers jointly create meaning with audiences.Public speaking is an audience-centered activity in which the speaker considers the needs and interest of the audience.Audience analysis is the process of gathering information about the people in the audience so a speaker can understand their needs, values, and expectations.Find an appropriate way to acknowledge and greet your audience.
Choose a
Worthwhile TopicYour topic should reflect regard for the audience; audiences do not want to listen to a speech that is too simple or a topic they already know a great deal about.Many students are tempted to choose an easy topic or a topic they already know a great deal about because it decreases their own workload rather than engaging audience interest.Choose a topic that is interesting enough for you to research and your audience to listen to.
Clarity is ImportantUse straightforward vocabulary and avoid convoluted sentences.
The Risk of ControversyControversial topics are topics about which people disagree.Many controversial topics confront people’s fundamental and closely-held values.There are often more than two perspectives on important controversial topics.How you treat your audience is just as important as how you treat your topic.
Adapting to
Audience NeedsAudiences differ in their perspectives and readiness to accept new ideas.Even in a homogeneous audience, an audience composed of people who are similar to one another, different listeners will understand the same ideas in different ways.Every member of every audience has his or her own frame of reference generated by their unique life experience.
Categories of
Life Experiences Demographic information refers to gender, age range, marital status, race and ethnicity, all of which impact an audience’s perspectives and needs.Socioeconomic status refers to characteristics including income, wealth, level of education, and occupational prestige.Psychographic information involves the beliefs, attitudes, values, and opinions that are most often difficult to predict.
Respecting your audience means that you avoid offending, excluding, or trivializing the beliefs and values they hold.
DiversityRefers not only to racial and ethnic groups, but also to religion, sexual orientation, body size, and physical and mental ability.
Respecting Diverse AudiencesBeing mindful of diversity means being respectful of all people and avoiding racism, ethnocentrism, stereotyping, sexism, ageism, elitism, and other assumptions.It’s easy to assume that people from a given culture are just alike, but they’re not; their social roles, life experiences, and circumstances vary.Frame of reference may be difficult to predict; for instance, we might assume that a successful businessman is primarily interested in p ...
Communication & Challenging Conversations PCMA 2014 MontrealMcKinley Solutions
Challenging conversations are those everyday interactions that significantly affect you and others. They differ from ordinary dialogue because the opinions of the participants may vary, the emotions are high and the stakes are significant. The way in which you deal with these important discussions can have a positive or negative result and can change the course of your relationship. Learn the tools to handle life’s most difficult conversations, say what’s on your mind, and achieve positive outcomes. Challenging confrontations consists of face-to-face accountability discussions where someone has disappointed you and you talk to him or her directly. When handled well, the problem is resolved and the relationship benefits. New research demonstrates that these disappointments aren’t just irritating – they’re costly, sapping organizational performance by 20 to 50 percent. Learn to permanently resolve failed promises and missed deadlines, transform broken rules and bad behaviors into productive accountability and strengthen relationships while solving problems. At the heart of mastering these challenges is the ability to engage in and maintain dialogue. Masters of dialogue create an atmosphere where everyone feels safe about adding his or her own views to the “shared pool” of ideas being expressed. The skills are critical to the success of all leadership roles. Active participants will increase their awareness of the challenging conversations and confrontations as well as hands-on tips and techniques on how to manage them effectively.
Learning Objectives:
1. How do I deal spontaneously with challenging conversations (where opinions vary, emotions are high and stakes are significant)?
2. How can I resolve problems where I have been disappointed by employee accountability and avoid unnecessary costs and strained relationships?
3. How do I develop and environment where people can carry on a dialogue and feel safe expressing their own view.
Running Head Public Speaking Class1Public Speaking Class3.docxtoltonkendal
Running Head: Public Speaking Class 1
Public Speaking Class 3
Each of the two chapters offers very important information. This information shall be summarized into the five most important items derived from each of the chapters as is done below:
Chapter Three: The Importance of Listening
· When we hear, we choose to filter out the sounds that we are of less meaning to us and pay attention to the more meaningful sounds.
· When we listen, we are motivated by a purpose to exert effort to pay attention to something, such as when working, something which we do only at given times.
· For a person to listen critically, an activity which goes hand in hand with critical thinking, he/she engages in a systematic thought process to determine whether the message received is sensible enough.
· Some of the main ways for developing critical listening are uncovering assumptions, recognizing the differences between facts and opinions, relating new ideas to old ones, being open to new ideas and relying on reason and common sense (Wrench, Goding, Johnson, & Attias, The Importance of Listening, 2011).
· To listen ethically entails giving the speaker a fair opportunity to speak make himself clearly understood, and being mindful and respectful of him as well.
Chapter Four: Ethics Matter: Understanding the Ethics of Public Speaking
· Based on the ethics pyramid, the three basic concepts of ethics in public speaking are ends (what a person hopes to achieve), means (how a person intends to achieve the outcome he desires) and intention.
· For ethics to be exercised efficiently in public speaking, the speaker should be able to strike a balance between these three basic concepts.
· Nine principles of ethical communication basically define the moral considerations that are to be made when engaging in communication under public speaking.
· What each of these principles have in common is that they acknowledge that while it is necessary for public speakers to speak up/communicate whenever they feel it is necessary, they should do so while considering the impact of their communication to others.
· Free speech, which is the right that one has to freely express ideas or information without having to worry about government restrictions or any other limitations as guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution is of importance to a public speaker since public speaking generally entails the passage of information and ideas to the public allowing them to consider multiple points of view (Wrench, Goding, Johnson, & Attias, Ethics Matters: Understanding the Ethics of Public Speaking, 2011).
REFERENCES
Wrench, Goding, Johnson, & Attias. (2011). Ethics Matters: Understanding the Ethics of Public Speaking. In Stand Up, Speak Out: The Practice and Ethics of Public Speaking. Flatworld Knowledge.
Wrench, Goding, Johnson, & Attias. (2011). The Importance of Listening. In Stand Up, Seak Out: The Practice and Ethics of Public Speaking. Flatworld Knowledge.
...
Communication Theory 2713-850Midterm Study Guide (up to 150 pts).docxcargillfilberto
Communication Theory 2713-850
Midterm Study Guide (up to 150 pts)
· Time Limit - 120 Minutes. Multiple Attempts Allowed (Note: If you complete it multiple times, then the score would be averaged)
· 50 questions, multiple choice. Look for the most suitable answer.
· Chapters 1-4;7-9;13
Academic Integrity
Academic Integrity Academic misconduct is any act which improperly affects the evaluation of a student’s academic performance or achievement. Misconduct occurs when the student either knows or reasonably should know that the act constitutes misconduct. Cheating is strictly prohibited at the University of Oklahoma, because it devalues the degree you are working hard to get. As a member of the OU community it is your responsibility to protect your educational investment by knowing and following the rules. For specific definitions on what constitutes cheating, review the Student’s Guide to Academic Integrity at http://integrity.ou.edu/students_guide.html.To be successful in this class, all work on exams and quizzes must be yours and yours alone; unless otherwise specifically instructed. You may not receive outside help.
Reasonable Accommodation Policy
Students requiring academic accommodation should contact the Disability Resource Center for assistance at (405) 325-3852 or TDD: (405) 325-4173. For more information please see the Disability Resource Center website http://www.ou.edu/drc/home.html Any student in this course who has a disability that may prevent him or her from fully demonstrating his or her abilities should contact me personally as soon as possible so we can discuss accommodations necessary to ensure full participation and facilitate your educational opportunities.
Chapter 1
What is a theory and what does it do? What is communication? What is communication theory?
Key names and terms: Judee Burgoon, Ernest Bormann
Theory - A set of systematic, informed hunches about the way things work.
Communication - The relational process of creating and interpreting messages that elicit a response.
Text - A record of a message that can be analyzed by others; for example, a book, film, photograph, or any transcript or recording of a speech or broadcast.
Polysemic - A quality of symbols that means they are open to multiple interpretations.
Chapter 2
What is an objective approach? What is an interpretive approach? Objective or interpretive: Why is it important? Ways of knowing: Discovering truth or creating multiple realities?
Key names and terms: Stanley Deetz
Behavioral scientist - A scholar who applies the scientific method to describe, predict, and explain recurring forms of human behavior.
Rhetorician - A scholar who studies the ways in which symbolic forms can be used to identify with people, or to persuade them toward a certain point of view.
Objective approach - The assumption that truth is singular and is accessible through unbiased sensory observation; committed to uncovering cause-and-effect relationships.
Resonance pri.
Communication Theory 2713-850Midterm Study Guide (up to 150 pts).docxdrandy1
Communication Theory 2713-850
Midterm Study Guide (up to 150 pts)
· Time Limit - 120 Minutes. Multiple Attempts Allowed (Note: If you complete it multiple times, then the score would be averaged)
· 50 questions, multiple choice. Look for the most suitable answer.
· Chapters 1-4;7-9;13
Academic Integrity
Academic Integrity Academic misconduct is any act which improperly affects the evaluation of a student’s academic performance or achievement. Misconduct occurs when the student either knows or reasonably should know that the act constitutes misconduct. Cheating is strictly prohibited at the University of Oklahoma, because it devalues the degree you are working hard to get. As a member of the OU community it is your responsibility to protect your educational investment by knowing and following the rules. For specific definitions on what constitutes cheating, review the Student’s Guide to Academic Integrity at http://integrity.ou.edu/students_guide.html.To be successful in this class, all work on exams and quizzes must be yours and yours alone; unless otherwise specifically instructed. You may not receive outside help.
Reasonable Accommodation Policy
Students requiring academic accommodation should contact the Disability Resource Center for assistance at (405) 325-3852 or TDD: (405) 325-4173. For more information please see the Disability Resource Center website http://www.ou.edu/drc/home.html Any student in this course who has a disability that may prevent him or her from fully demonstrating his or her abilities should contact me personally as soon as possible so we can discuss accommodations necessary to ensure full participation and facilitate your educational opportunities.
Chapter 1
What is a theory and what does it do? What is communication? What is communication theory?
Key names and terms: Judee Burgoon, Ernest Bormann
Theory - A set of systematic, informed hunches about the way things work.
Communication - The relational process of creating and interpreting messages that elicit a response.
Text - A record of a message that can be analyzed by others; for example, a book, film, photograph, or any transcript or recording of a speech or broadcast.
Polysemic - A quality of symbols that means they are open to multiple interpretations.
Chapter 2
What is an objective approach? What is an interpretive approach? Objective or interpretive: Why is it important? Ways of knowing: Discovering truth or creating multiple realities?
Key names and terms: Stanley Deetz
Behavioral scientist - A scholar who applies the scientific method to describe, predict, and explain recurring forms of human behavior.
Rhetorician - A scholar who studies the ways in which symbolic forms can be used to identify with people, or to persuade them toward a certain point of view.
Objective approach - The assumption that truth is singular and is accessible through unbiased sensory observation; committed to uncovering cause-and-effect relationships.
Resonance pri.
The Assignment (3–5 pages)Complete a leadership development plan .docxSANSKAR20
The Assignment (3–5 pages):
Complete a leadership development plan that includes the following:
Section I
Your current strengths and weaknesses as a leader
Opportunities and threats to developing and further enhancing your leadership capacity as a change agent (e.g., social change)
Justify your responses with specific examples.
Section II
Using the “Public Health Leadership Competency Framework,” developed by the National Public Health Leadership Network as a guide (refer to the article posted in the weekly Resources), describe a leadership plan to develop the following over the next 3–5 years. Include the following:
Your core transformational competencies (visionary leadership, sense of mission, effective change agent)
Political competencies (political processes, negotiation, ethics and power, marketing and education)
Organizational competencies
Team-building competencies
Personality factors
Crisis abilities
Justify your rationale for your selections.
.
The assignment consist of a Case Study. I have attached the Case St.docxSANSKAR20
The assignment consist of a Case Study. I have attached the Case Study to be researched. Please answer all of the questions and be specific with all requirements for the Case Study such as the format, the amount of pages the paper is required to be written, the sources and references, etc... Please follow all directions that are highlighted in the attachment.
.
The annotated bibliography will present an introduction and five ref.docxSANSKAR20
The annotated bibliography will present an introduction and five reference citations with annotations. The purpose of the annotated bibliography is to determine the appropriateness of the sources to the argument you are developing for the Course Project. The format of the proposal is an introductory paragraph followed by an alphabetized list of sources with two paragraphs of annotation after each source. Use APA documentation to document any sources referenced in your proposal. The thesis is on Texting while driving.
.
The artist Georges Seurat is one of the worlds most fascinating art.docxSANSKAR20
The artist Georges Seurat is one of the world's most fascinating artists. His technique of pointillism was pivotal in inspiring future generations of painters to think about painting in both individualistic and non-conformist ways. This week's reading references many artists from different movements (i.e. Pablo Picasso, Leonardo da Vinci).
Conduct research on an artist from any movement that you find interesting. Choose one of their works. Analyze the image using the four visual cues from your reading: color, form, depth, and movement. Explain how the artist makes use of these four cues.
In your deconstruction of the image, also explain how the physiology of the eye helps you to see the four cues.
This paper should be 2-3 pages long.
.
The Assignment (2–3 pages including a budget worksheet)Explain th.docxSANSKAR20
The Assignment (2–3 pages including a budget worksheet):
Explain the funding issues related to your selected public health project or service related to your Final Project. Include an explanation of whether these issues are long- or short-term, how urgent, and which stakeholders might be most affected (1–1.5 pages).
Complete the budget worksheet provided indicating the funding opportunities and costs related to the chosen project.
Based on the Learning Resources and your research, as well as the information included in the budget worksheet, recommend some potential funding sources and explain why you recommend them. In your explanation, include variations in funding and how these variations influenced your decision making (1–1.5 pages).
Complete and submit your Assignment by Day 7.
.
The assigment is to Research and find me resources on Portland Sta.docxSANSKAR20
The assigment is to Research and find me resources on "Portland State University's Administration Issue of
Urban Environment (Theft/Crime).
It’s important that you clarify symptoms and causes of these problems, develop and present some alternative solutions, choose one, and support your decision
Please provide at least 5 different sources about this topic.
I will be giving a ten minute presentation and will need to use this information for it and will be graded on the
logic/quality/substance of our argument
.
the article.httpwww.nytimes.com20120930opinionsundaythe-m.docxSANSKAR20
the article.
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/09/30/opinion/sunday/the-myth-of-male-decline.html?smid=fb-share&_r=0
(Links to an external site.)
Briefly summarize the article. In your summary be sure to mention how the author illustrates the social construction of sexism. (5 points)
Describe the ways in which women’s educational, employment, and financial experiences are negatively affected by institutional sexism. (5 points)
The “Myth of the Male Mystique” Coontz talks about constrains men’s self-image as well as their educational and work experiences. Describe the ways in which this happens. (5 points)
.
The Arts and Royalty; Philosophers Debate Politics Please respond .docxSANSKAR20
"The Arts and Royalty; Philosophers Debate Politics" Please respond to
one (1)
of the following,
using sources under the Explore heading
as the basis of your response:
In this week’s readings, a dispute in the French royal court is described about whether Poussin or Rubens was the better painter. Take a painting by each, either from our book or a Website below, and compare them and explain which you prefer. There is another conflict between the playwright Moliere and a well-born Parisian; Louis XIV stepped in. Explain how Louis XIV used the various arts and his motives for doing so. Identify one (1) example of a modern political leader approaching the arts this way.
The philosophers Thomas Hobbes and John Locke disagreed on the understanding of political authority, with Locke taking what is commonly called the “liberal” view. Choose a side (be brave perhaps; take a side you actually disagree with). Using the writings of each given in our class text or at the Websites below, make your case for the side you chose and against the other side. Identify one (1) modern situation in the world where these issues are significant.
Explore:
The Arts and Royalty
Chapter 23 (pp. 730-741); Rubens; Poussin; Moliere; royalty using the arts
Rubens and Poussin at
http://www.visitmuseums.com/exhibition/from-baroque-to-classicism-rubens-poussin-and-17th-85
and
http://www.wga.hu/frames-e.html?/bio/p/poussin/biograph.html
Philosophers Debate Politics
Chapter 24 (pp. 768-9)
Hobbes: text at
http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/phl302/texts/hobbes/leviathan-contents.html
; summary at
http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/hobbes-moral/
; also
http://jim.com/hobbes.htm
Locke: text at
http://www.thenagain.info/Classes/Sources/Locke-2ndTreatise.html
; General background of the concept at
http://www.digitalhistory.uh.edu/teachers/lesson_plans/pdfs/unit1_12.pdf
.
The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the immediate caus.docxSANSKAR20
The assassination of Archduke Franz Ferdinand was the immediate cause of World War I. But the events that led to the Great War go further back into the nineteenth century. As with the Boxer Rebellion of 1900, nationalism, imperialism, and militarism all played a part.
Analyze how the forces of nationalism, imperialism, and militarism irrevocably led to World War I. Pay particular attention to the rise of Pan-Slavism in Eastern Europe and the corresponding rise of nationalism in German-speaking states. Analyze how the alliance system contributed to the ultimate outbreak of war.
.
The article Fostering Second Language Development in Young Children.docxSANSKAR20
The article "Fostering Second Language Development in Young Children" makes the statement, "Children become bilingual in different ways." Explain at least two different ways that children become bilingual and why it is important for people who work with young children who are learning two languages to understand the term
language imbalance
.
Based on the information on vocabulary development in your course text and other readings, explain the differences in vocabulary development for children who are bilingual and considerations to keep in mind with regard to assessing vocabulary development.
Explain some of the ways that culture influences children's language development and why cultural differences should be respected by educators and others who work with young children and families.
.
The Article Critique is required to be a minimum of two pages to a m.docxSANSKAR20
The Article Critique is required to be a minimum of two pages to a maximum of four pages, double-spaced, APA style,
from the journals and articles available in our CSU Library Databases. The article should deal with any of the material
presented in the first three units of this course. The article itself must be more than one page in length. The article critique
should include the following components:
A brief introduction of the article
Analysis of the key points in the article
Application and comparison of some points in the article that might be applied to the company you work for, or
have worked for
Summary of the article's conclusions and your own opinions
the article is:
Policy fíriefing
Senate Bill Aims to Prevent Chemical
Contamination of Surface Water
IHE CHEMICAL
spill that
' recently occurred in West
Virginia and interrupted
water deliveries to approximately
300,000 of that
state's residents has led to the introduction
of federal legislation aimed at preventing
the recurrence of such events.
Although improved protection of surface
water enjoys broad support, questions
have arisen as to who should oversee
and fijnd the additional regulatory
efforts called for in the bill.
On January 9 it was discovered that
thousands of gallons of chemicals used in
coal processing had leaked from storage
facilities at a tank farm located along the
Elk River in Charleston, West Virginia.
The chemicals entered the waterway approximately
1.5 mi upstream of a public
water supply intake, forcing officials
to recommend that residents of a ninecounty
area in and around Charleston
not use their drinking water. Lasting for
more than a week, this situation caused
considerable concern about health effects
and spurred calls for regulatory
protections.
On January 27 Senator Joe Manchin
(D-West Virginia) introduced the
Chemical Safety and Drinking Water
Protection Act of 2014 (S. 1961), legislation
that aims to protect surface water
from contamination from chemical
storage facilities. The bill would revise
the Safe Drinking Water Act to establish
state programs for overseeing and
inspecting chemical storage facilities
that are deemed to pose a risk to public
water sources. Within one year of enactment
of the legislation, states would
have to set requirements for chemical
storage facilities covered by the new
programs. These requirements would
address such topics as "acceptable standards
of good design, construction, or
maintenance," along with leak detection,
spill and overfill control, inventory
control, inspections of facility integrity.
and life-cycle maintenance, according to
the legislation.
Additional requirements would pertain
to emergency response and communication
plans, employee training and
safety plans, and the financial responsibility
of the owners of chemical storage
facilities. States would share with drinking
water providers the emergency response
plans fo.
The Apple Computer Company is one of the most innovative technology .docxSANSKAR20
The Apple Computer Company is one of the most innovative technology companies to emerge in the last three decades. Apple, Inc. is responsible for bringing to market such products as the Macintosh computer and laptop, the iPod and iTunes, and most recently, the iPhone. The success of the company can be traced primarily to a single individual, the co-founder, Steven Jobs.
First, review the following case study:
Steve Jobs and Apple, Inc.
Then, respond to the following:
Determine and explain what type of leader Steve Jobs was.
Explain how his vision and values were reflected in his leadership style.
Summarize the initial challenges he faced when starting Apple. Specifically, address Jobs’ strategy and implementation.
Identify and explain the drivers for change in the personal computer industry.
Discuss how Steve Jobs used partnerships and collaboration.
Analyze Jobs’ approach to continuous process improvement.
Determine what skills, ideas, and approaches might be useful in your own work/life situation.
Utilize at least two scholarly sources.
Write a 3–5-page report in Word format. Apply APA standards to the citation of sources. Use the following file naming convention
Make sure you write in a clear, concise, and organized manner; demonstrate ethical scholarship through accurate representation and attribution of sources; and display accurate spelling, grammar, and punctuation.
.
The artist Georges Seurat is one of the worlds most fascinating art.docxSANSKAR20
The artist Georges Seurat is one of the world's most fascinating artists. His technique of pointillism was pivotal in inspiring future generations of painters to think about painting in both individualistic and non-conformist ways. This week�s reading references many artists from different movements (i.e. Pablo Picasso, Leonardo da Vinci).
Conduct research on an artist from any movement that you find interesting. Choose one of their works. Analyze the image using the four visual cues from your reading: color, form, depth, and movement. Explain how the artist makes use of these four cues.
In your deconstruction of the image, also explain how the physiology of the eye helps you to see the four cues.
This paper should be 2-3 pages long. Be sure to cite any resources using proper APA notation.
Part 2 not related to the above
.
The Article Attached A Bretton Woods for InnovationBy St.docxSANSKAR20
The Article Attached
A Bretton Woods for Innovation
By Stephen Ezell
double-space (3-4 pages); Times New Roman, 12 font
1. Title Page
2. Summary of the article; major findings and issues (2-3 pages)
3. Critique of the article; use references.
.
The analysis must includeExecutive summaryHistory and evolution.docxSANSKAR20
The analysis must include:
Executive summary
History and evolution of the platform (How did it started?)
Features specific to the platform (Why is this platform unique?)
Characteristics of its audience (Who joins this network? What are they looking for?)
a. Demographics
b. Motivation to use the platform
Relevant marketing metrics (How can we measure success?)
Ideas to create an engaging profile (What type of content should be posted?)
Successful brands on the platform (“Best of the platform 2014” )
Other relevant information
2 pages, 1.5 spac
.
The annotated bibliography for your course is now due. The annotated.docxSANSKAR20
The annotated bibliography for your course is now due. The annotated bibliography should be about a page and must contain at least three research sources.
Your annotated bibliography must be in APA format. For guidelines click the following link:
Annotated Bibliography
Example :
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 1
APA 6
th
Edition Guidelines: Annotated Bibliography
An annotated bibliography is the full citation of a source followed by notes and commentary
about a source. The word “annotate” means “critical or explanatory notes” and the word “bibliography” means “a list of sources”. Annotations are not the same as abstracts. Abstracts
are purely descriptive summaries often found at the beginning of scholarly/ academic journal articles. Annotations are meant to be critical in addition to being descriptive.
Format:
The format for an annotated bibliography is similar to that of a research paper. Use one-inch margins on all sides, double-space your entries, and arrange each entry in alphabetical order. Hanging Indents are required for citations in the bibliography, as shown below. The first line of the citation starts at the left margin and subsequent lines of the citation will be indented.
Example: Journal Article with DOI
Calkins, S., & Kelley, M. (2007, Fall). Evaluating internet and scholarly sources across the disciplines: Two case studies.
College Teaching
,
55
(4), 151-156. doi:10.1111/j.1747- 7379.2007.00759.x
This article discusses the problem of unintentional online plagiarism and many
students’ inability to evaluate, critique, synthesize, and credit online sources properly.
Two case studies from different disciplines, which were designed to foster critical evaluation of the Internet and scholarly sources, are discussed in detail. The CARS (Credibility, Accuracy, Reasonableness, Support) checklist for evaluating research sources is also introduced and applied in these case studies. I found this article useful because much of the content of these case studies can be easily adapted to fit assignments in different academic disciplines. One information literacy assignment in one quarter at college is not enough. If students are expected to use the Internet in a responsible way, educators must provide guidelines and relevant experience that allows students to apply those guidelines in practical ways.
Updated 02/2010
ANNOTATED BIBLIOGRAPHY 2
For annotated bibliographies, use standard APA format for the citations, then add a brief entry, including:
•
2 to 4 sentences to
summarize
the main idea(s) of the source.
o
What are the main arguments?
o
What is the point of this book/article?
o
What topics are covered?
•
1 or 2 sentences to
assess
and evaluate the source.
o
How does it compare with other sources in your bibliography?
o
Is this information reliable?
o
Is the source objective or biased?
•
1 or 2 sentences to
reflect
on the source.
o
Was this source helpful to you?
o
How can you use this source for your res.
The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) was designed to protect wo.docxSANSKAR20
The Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) was designed to protect workers with disabilities against employer discrimination. As a group discuss the following:
In actual practice, how well does the Act achieve this goal? Explain. Support your answer with examples from recent court decisions.
Submit a summary of the your consensus.
.
The air they have of person who never knew how it felt to stand in .docxSANSKAR20
"The air they have of person who never knew how it felt to stand in the presence of superiors. ..their good temper and openhandedness the terrible significance of their eletion... he place himself where the future becomes present"
1. Some say whitman is the ultimate democrat, friend to all. Pleasant explain with examples
.
The agreement is for the tutor to write a Microsoft word doc of a .docxSANSKAR20
The agreement is for the tutor to write a
Microsoft word doc of a scene for 13-18 years old. Further instructions inside attachments below. Assignment due 9pm EST. 3hrs from post time.
The goal is to create characters and a voice that feel authentic to adolescence and would be appealing to adolescents to read.
For example, identity, coming-of-age, romantic relationships, work/school balance, and firsts (kiss, car, job, etc.) are a few of the relevant topics for this age group, although there are any number of topics you could use in your own version.
Instructions:
A “scene” would be about two pages of text, taking place in one location, where characters are present in that scene and interacting in some way. Some scenes may further character, most will probably further plot, some may further theme or emotion -- the crucial part is just to have dialogue and description and be sure to show rather than tell when appropriate.
.
The abstract is a 150-250 word summary of your Research Paper, and i.docxSANSKAR20
The abstract is a 150-250 word summary of your Research Paper, and it should be written only after you have finished writing the entire paper because how your abstract is worded largely depends on the development of your paper. Your abstract should be accurate, self-contained, concise and specific, non-evaluative, coherent, and readable.
.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
Ethnobotany and Ethnopharmacology:
Ethnobotany in herbal drug evaluation,
Impact of Ethnobotany in traditional medicine,
New development in herbals,
Bio-prospecting tools for drug discovery,
Role of Ethnopharmacology in drug evaluation,
Reverse Pharmacology.
Ethics Matters Understanding the Ethics of Public Speakin.docx
1. Ethics Matters: Understanding the Ethics of Public Speaking
Sections 4.1-4.2
Ethics Today & The Ethics Pyramid
The Ethics PyramidA model developed by Elspeth Tilley,
proposes three basic concepts: intent, means, and ends.
IntentionSimilarly, an ethical listener keeps an open mind,
listening to the speaker before making judgments.One way to
assess intent is to seek feedback from others; how ethical do
they think a behavior or a remark is?A second way to assess
intent is to check out existing codes of ethics.Third, consider
whether a behavior is beneficial for the majority, or whether
you would approve of the same behavior from someone
else.Sometimes people can engage in unethical behavior
unintentionally; plagiarism often occurs when a speaker uses a
phrase or content, forgetting that he or she read it in someone
else’s work.
2. MeansMeans are the tools or behaviors we use to achieve a
desired outcome.We have choices about which means to employ
in persuading others.Threats and other forms of manipulation
are unethical behaviors.Making a respectful request is ethical.
EndsThe outcomes you hope to achieve, say McCroskey,
Wrench, and Richmond (2002).Some end results could be good
for the source (speaker) but bad for the receiver (listener).
An example would be persuading audience members to buy
something they don’t actually want.Your goal should be chosen
according to ethical standards you and your audience expect
from each other.
Why the Pyramid MattersUnderstanding ethics is a matter of
balancing all three parts of the ethical pyramid.Tilley
recommends testing the ethics of a given behavior by
asking:“Have I discussed the ethicality of the behavior with
others and come to a general consensus that the behavior is
ethical?”“Does the behavior adhere to known codes of
ethics?”“Would I be happy if the outcomes of the behavior were
reversed and applied to me?”
Section 4.3
Ethics in Public Speaking
3. The NCA Credo for Ethical CommunicationA statement of their
values about ethics in human communication.
Nine Principles of Ethical Communication
Principle 1Truthfulness, accuracy, honesty, and reason.
Principle 2Freedom of expression, diversity of perspective, and
tolerance of dissent.
Principle 3Understanding of and respect for other
communicators before passing judgment.
Principle 4Access to communication resources and opportunities
for the purpose of promoting the well-being of families,
communities, and society.
Principle 5Communication climates of caring, mutual
understanding, and respect.
Principle 6Condemnation of distortion, intimidation, coercion,
violence intolerance, hate speech, violence, or other behavior
4. that degrades people.
Principle 7Support for the expression of personal convictions in
pursuit of fairness and justice.
Principle 8Advocate sharing information, opinions, and feelings
while respecting privacy and confidentiality.
Principle 9Responsibility for the short- and long-term
consequences of our communication.
Section 4.4
Free Speech
What is Free Speech“The right to express information, ideas,
and opinions free of government restrictions based on content
and subject only to reasonable limitations (as the power of the
government to avoid a clear and present danger) esp. as
guaranteed by the First and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S.
Constitution” (Merriam Webster’s Dictionary of Law).
Why is Free Speech Important for Public Speakers?Expressing
information and ideas is the purpose of public speaking.Free
5. speech allows us, as audience members, to hear and consider
multiple points of view so that we can make more informed
decisions.
The First Amendment to the Constitution
Free Speech is Solidified in the Bill of Rights“Congress shall
make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom
of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably
to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of
grievances.”
Limitations to Free Speech2007 Supreme Court decision in the
Morse et al. v. Frederick case or the “Bong Hits for Jesus”
case.Free speech is constantly being debated by politicians,
judges, and the public, even within the United States, where this
right has been discussed for over two-hundred years.
The Importance of Listening
6. Section 3.1
Listening vs. Hearing
Hearing An accidental and automatic brain response.We select
sounds we pay attention to (e.g., our cell phones).We learn to
filter out and ignore the sounds we find meaningless.
Listening Listening is purposeful and focused
attention.Listening involves motivation and effort. Work is
involved in giving concentrated attention.We achieve good
listening at certain times, but not others.
Section 3.2
Listening Critically
Critical ListeningThe use of careful, systematic thinking to see
whether a message makes sense. Critical listening and thinking
can be learned and developed through practice.Critical listening
and thinking are not necessarily easy to develop.Some messages
are highly complex.Some messages are about unfamiliar
topics.Some messages are filled with dense, technical
language.Some messages are intentionally convoluted and
confusing.
7. Six Ways to Develop Critical Listening
Recognize the Differences between Facts and
OpinionsSometimes facts and opinions are mixed together in a
speech.Strong opinions can lead a speaker or a listener to deny
or downplay the facts.
Uncover AssumptionsFacts are supported by real
evidence.Assumptions are not supported by existing
evidence.What those facts mean is often assumed.When there is
a gap in knowledge or logic, we might guess, or make and
assumption about what the facts must mean.We might also take
as truth the things “everybody knows.”
Be Open to New IdeasPeople often believe their perceptions of
the world are accurate and complete.Such a belief makes it hard
to accept messages at odds with their perceptions, even when
those messages are true; they are not open to new ideas.
Rely on Reason and Common SenseDoes the speech seem
credible and coherent?Does the claim seem to be out of
proportion to reality?Is the message consistent with what you
already know as fact?Does the speaker substitute common sense
for actual evidence?Does the speaker assume everybody agrees
with him or her?
8. Relate New Ideas to
Old OnesSee how what the speaker is saying relates to what you
already know.Does the speaker make effective comparisons?
Take NotesNotes should reflect the meanings of the
message.Refrain from making so many notes that it distracts
you from good listening.Learn to identify the central issues in
messages.
Listen EthicallyListening ethically rests heavily on honest
intentions.We should give the speaker our full, receptive
attention.We should attempt to understand their meanings.We
should refrain from checking cell phones and whispering.We
should extend respect, or unconditional positive regard, even if
we disagree.