3. Microsoft founder Bill Gates suggested that we'd be carrying around
small "handwriting machines''—with wireless connectivity—that we
could pack full of scribbled, shareable information.
4. Surprisingly EVRYONE predicted the brisk technology
development, but NONE predicted the social
networks
5. Our life really changed with the SM presence
We twitt, re-twitt, like, share, comment, put on-line,
upload and download, hash-tag and many more
6.
7.
8.
9. We already start our day from SM, the time with
virtual interactions is already between 20 min and 5
hours a day.
10. We communicate less in person, we have less true
emotions, comically our life becomes more shared, yet
more secluded
In some countries this effect grew to the point where cafes
fight for the consumers not among themselves but for the
customer to go out of home
11. New technologies give people great comfort, lots of
communication but did friendship scarce as well as
true emotions
12. As long as people would like to interact, people would
keep communicating , sharing, exchanging with each
other
As positive from the technology evolution, the comfort
would grow to truly sharing not the pictures or content
but context as well, a stream of life (e.g. Google glass)
With the yet more advancement in technologies, I
would expect that the virtual communication would
approach the real one (e.g. Holograms, 3D experience,
presence effect)
13. As a potential negative impact – there would be no
privacy any longer, people would be on-line 24/7, all
the data from any action would be collected and
analyzed, person would hence be on and off- line
A l’extreme, as depicted in Black mirror TV series
episode, one would be able to recreate the personality
from it SM accounts….
14. No technology shall substitute the real human
communication
Technology facilitate it, make it easier, faster
But off-line world is the real one still (despite that I am
applying on-line with the presentation processor,
shared in cloud
