2. Entailment
Entailment is something that logically follows from what is asserted in
the utterance.
Entailment Relations And Truth Conditions:
Either S1 entails S2 or S2 entails S1 i.e., truth conditionally related
Neither S1 entails S2 nor S2 entails S1 , i.e., truth conditionally
unrelated
Both S1 and S2 entails each other i.e., truth conditionally equivalent.
Both S1and S2 contradicts each other i.e., truth conditionally
contradicted.
3. Presupposition
Presupposition is something the speakers assume to be the case
prior to making an utterance.
Two Approaches to presupposition
semantic approach
Pragmatic approach
For Example
p) John’s brother has just got back from Texas.
q) John has a brother.
4. Presupposition as a truth relation
o if p (the presupposing sentence) is true then q (the presupposed
sentence) is true.
o If p is false , then q is still true.
o If q is true , p could either be true or false.
o For example :
p) John’s brother has just got back from Texas.
q) John has a brother.
5. Presupposition failure
For example
a. The king of France is bald.
b. there is a king of France.
Presupposition Triggers
Presuppositions are produced by particular words or constructions,
called presupposition triggers.
Many of the lexical triggers are verbs i.e.,
Factive verbs
Aspectual verbs
6. Factive verbs like realize , regret etc.
a) John regretted eating the banana.
b) John considered eating the banana.
c) John ate banana.
Aspectual verbs like start , begin , stop.
a)John started smoking.
b) John used not to smoke.
7. Pragmatic theories of
presupposition
Stalnaker argued that presupposition is essentially a pragmetics
phenomenon.
Sperber and Wilson argued that presupposition is not an
independent phenomenon but one of a series of effects produced
when the speaker employs syntactic structure and intonation to
show the hearer how the current sentence fits into previous
background.
Do YOU like it?
Do you LIKE it?
Do you like IT?