3. Entailment Relations And Truth
Conditions:
Either S1 entails S2 or S2 entails S1 i.e., truth
conditionally related
Neither S1 entails S2 nor S2 entails S1 , i.e.,
truth conditionally unrelated
Both S1 and S2 entails each other i.e., truth
conditionally equivalent.
Both S1and S2 contradicts each other i.e.,
truth conditionally contradicted.
4. Presupposition
Presupposition is something the
speakers assume to be the case prior
to making an utterance.
Two Approaches to presupposition
semantic approach
Pragmatic approach
6. Presupposition as a truth relation
o if p (the presupposing sentence) is
true then q (the presupposed
sentence) is true.
o If p is false , then q is still true.
o If q is true , p could either be true or
false.
7. o For example :
p) John’s brother has just got back
from Texas.
q) John has a brother.
9. Presupposition Triggers
Presuppositions are produced by
particular words or constructions,
called presupposition triggers.
Many of the lexical triggers are verbs
i.e.,
Factive verbs
Aspectual verbs
10. Factive verbs like realize , regret etc.
a) John regretted eating the banana.
b) John considered eating the
banana.
c) John ate banana.
11. Aspectual verbs like start , begin ,
stop.
a)John started smoking.
b) John used not to smoke.
12. Pragmatic theories of
presupposition
Stalnaker argued that presupposition is
essentially a pragmetics phenomenon.
Sperber and Wilson argued that
presupposition is not an independent
phenomenon but one of a series of effects
produced when the speaker employs
syntactic structure and intonation to show
the hearer how the current sentence fits
into previous background.