The document summarizes the electronic billing and payment market, including statistics on transaction volumes, revenues, and market shares of major competitors. It describes the consolidated bank bill pay model and online biller direct model. The top four bill pay processors - Fiserv, FIS, ORCC, and iPay/Jack Henry - control over 80% of the bank bill pay market. Fiserv is the largest provider with 60% market share. Western Union dominates walk-in bill payment and expedited payment through its large agent network. Overall, electronic bill payment transactions are growing rapidly while check and cash usage declines.
Epayments system in India and globally iit project abhiROCKS1103
IIT project on epayments. Including all the method uses and innovations in e payments and the growth of epayments in the modern world and rapid growth in india after demonetization.
,
customer accounts in a bank
,
banking accounts in bangladesh
,
cons of current account
,
procedure to open an account
,
current account
,
pros of savings account
,
pros of fixed deposit
,
recurring deposit
,
fixed deposit
,
cons of fixed comparisondeposits
,
pros of recurring deposit account
Epayments system in India and globally iit project abhiROCKS1103
IIT project on epayments. Including all the method uses and innovations in e payments and the growth of epayments in the modern world and rapid growth in india after demonetization.
,
customer accounts in a bank
,
banking accounts in bangladesh
,
cons of current account
,
procedure to open an account
,
current account
,
pros of savings account
,
pros of fixed deposit
,
recurring deposit
,
fixed deposit
,
cons of fixed comparisondeposits
,
pros of recurring deposit account
4 way recon solution for ATM,POS,Recyclers,Mobile banking, Internet banking,etcPratap Parab
4 way recon solution for ATM,POS,Recyclers,Mobile banking, Internet banking,etc for end to end settlement, chargeback, representment and incident cycle
This presentation gives an overview about how is India progressing into making UN's Vision 2020 goal (of financial inclusion) a reality.
It's a technology breakthrough India has been achieved in combat to score financial data security in 21st century and independence from reliance over other nations to provide multilateral system of payments in India.
An e-payment system is a way of making transactions or paying for goods and services through an electronic medium, without the use of checks or cash. It’s also called an electronic payment system or online payment system. T
4 way recon solution for ATM,POS,Recyclers,Mobile banking, Internet banking,etcPratap Parab
4 way recon solution for ATM,POS,Recyclers,Mobile banking, Internet banking,etc for end to end settlement, chargeback, representment and incident cycle
This presentation gives an overview about how is India progressing into making UN's Vision 2020 goal (of financial inclusion) a reality.
It's a technology breakthrough India has been achieved in combat to score financial data security in 21st century and independence from reliance over other nations to provide multilateral system of payments in India.
An e-payment system is a way of making transactions or paying for goods and services through an electronic medium, without the use of checks or cash. It’s also called an electronic payment system or online payment system. T
In Client billing system user can input client information that means client details.And when its need to generate bill for Client its just create invoice for client.And client receive a bill.When client payment bill than its invoice status showing success otherwise pending.
Mobile Based Electricity Billing Systems is a combination of a distributed system to
facilitate better performance of electricity billing process. the database was developed using
MySQL server version 6, developed by Oracle and the framework used to design android
applications is Eclipse which is OSI Certified Open Source Software. Most of the Eclipse
SDK is "pure" Java code and has no direct dependence on the underlying operating system.
The chief dependence is therefore on the Java Platform itself. Portions are targeted to specific
classes of operating environments, requiring their source code to only reference facilities
available in particular class.
The Apache server, which is used to create the virtual server is a HTTP Server Project
which is a collaborative software development effort aimed at creating a robust, commercialgrade, featured, and freely-available source code implementation of an HTTP (Web) server.
And the XAMPP version 1.8.3 is a configuration package containing Apache 2.4.4, MySQL
5.5.32 (Community Server), PHP 5.5.6 (VC11 X86 32bit thread safe) and phpMyAdmin 4.0.4
these frameworks were used in developing this software.
UT Meter Reading System is online mobile and web based application designed to help Power/Electric industry to streamline the process of collecting the readings of electric meters.
Established in the year 2009, we, “Unitech Sales”, are engaged in importing, distributing, supplying and exporting a comprehensive range of premium quality Automation equipment and Allied Products. Under the offered array, we provide Energy/Power Saver, Hooter & Buzzers, Space Heaters & Thermostats, Epoxy cast H T indoor C Ts & P Ts., Semaphores Indicators and Controlling/Auxiliary Switches. In addition to this, we provide Closing/Tripping Coils, Controlling/Auxiliary Switches, Vacuum Interrupters, Silica Gel & Breathers, Oil & Winding Temp. Gauges and PRV Pressure Relief Valve.
Branch transformation strategies to improve branch efficiency, lower costs and improve the customer experience. Contact me at chris.gill@diebold.com for more information.
Leveraging Mobile Money to Increase Financial InclusionJohn Owens
This presentation was given during the Asian Development Bank session on "Enhancing the Potential for Inclusion-Friendly Electronic G2P Payments" held at the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) on May 2, 2012.
Digital Invoicing and Digital Payments | Electronic Invoicing | E-Invoicing S...Emagia
Digital Invoicing and Digital Payments
Maintain a healthier cash flow with Digital Invoicing and Digital Payments.
Digital is emerging as the latest industry trend for sending the customers request-to-pay reminders and giving them access to faster, more convenient payment options. Unlike the conventional paper-based invoicing methods, digital invoices can be sent to customers on mobile and email, accepting digital payments over credit card, ACH and bank-to- bank transfers.
https://www.emagia.com/resources/ebooks/digital-invoicing-digital-payments/
Increasing eCommerce & Online Transactions in IndiaP J
How Reserve Bank of India (RBI) can facilitate eCommerce and Online Transactions in India through Credit Cards, Debit Cards & Internet Banking. Does India Require its own Electronic Payment Processing Network?
Organizing For Business Agility - Atlanta Nov 2016Randy Pilkenton
Excellence in building (and running) the product the right way does not ensure that the right product yields business benefits.
Together, this calls for a culture of outcome-orientation and product-centricity.
Aiming for business agility thus requires us to reconsider how we operate along different dimensions such as funding of development work, team structure, procurement, governance and decision making.
Business Agility - A Cargo Cult of InnovationRandy Pilkenton
You were promised innovation. You were promised more customers, new streams of value, a nimble organization.
You were let down.
They said all it would take was an open-plan office, some scrum masters, and a dash of "design thinking" (whatever the heck that is), but here you are with three ping-pong tables and no market disruption. What happened?
There are no silver bullets. There's no one weird trick, no perfect universal framework that guarantees innovation, and anyone who tells you otherwise is trying to sell you something. Creating an organization that innovates regularly is hard, and while the strategies and steps we can use to get there are simple, that doesn’t mean they’re quick or easy.
How can companies - small and large - develop better products for their customers? Ones that their customers want and ones that will delight them? In a growlingly digital world that is changing every industry and company, and swallowing some whole, agility is a business value driver and not just good to do, but required.
Lean and agile methods and practices are the most common approach used by leading digital companies such as Expedia, Google, and Netflix and also large global enterprises who are transforming how they deliver business value faster - with higher quality - to the customer.
Agility is not just an "IT thing". It is a business imperative.
3. Bank Pays
Biller Pays
Consolidated (Bank Bill Pay) Model
Consumer Mailed Bill
$.35 - .55/trans.
Biller
Payment
By Check
Billing and
Online Banking & Payment Processor
Bill Pay
Application Payment
$.05 - .15/trans.
Instructions
debit credit
Consumer’s Bank ACH Network Biller’s Bank
2012. Property of Latente, LLC.
4. Notes on Consolidated Model
Thick and Thin E-Bills
Typically summary (Thin) data is stored at EBP processor. For full detail (Thick) consumer
is redirected to biller. Some billers outsource both Thin and Thick to EBP processor.
Top 400 Billers (by volume) typically reached with electronic payments and
remittance (80% of volume)
On Us– payees that are the FI themselves (e.g., credit card) may be stripped off
Smaller Billers – and payments by riskier / new consumers – typically are mailed a paper
check payment
Depending upon processor some electronic volume may go through intermediaries such as
RPPS for remittance
Variations on the Consolidated Model
FI provides bill payment application that uses “web services” from the EBP processor
FI provides bill payment application and payment warehouse – uses single EBP processor
for batch remittance
Banks attempt least cost routing - try to maximize economies of On Us/We, and routing
remittance through RPPS and others rather than 100% of volume to single processor
2012. Property of Latente, LLC.
5. Online Biller Direct Model
Consumer
Biller
Payment
Remittance
Instructions
Biller Website
ACH
Consumer’s Bank Biller’ Bank
2012. Property of Latente, LLC.
6. Notes on Online Biller Direct Model
• Variations of the Biller Direct Model
• Biller’s may use various models to host their Online Biller Direct site
• Host it themselves – purchasing software from a vendor and using their bank for ACH debits
• Outsource hosting to vendor – typically driven by per transaction fees (less $.05 depending on volume)
• Emergency / On-Demand
• Most prevalently an IVR (phone) oriented model (also available through call center and online)
• Immediate posting of payments (depending on payment type and risk model, may be memo post)
• Usually credit or debit card along with a convenience fee to cover payment (interchange) costs plus a
“penalty” (fee may be all to Biller or split with a service provider; can be $3 to over $15)
• Walk-in / Agent Pay
• Offered in Authorized (Biller contracts with agents to accept payments) – can include Emergency
• Also offered in Non-authorized / Convenience – agents accept payments for any biller their payment
processor can reach (Convenience typically has consumer fee of $1 to $3; includes cost of processing)
• Authorized often free to consumer – Biller pays agent a fee ($.50; includes cost of processing)
• Authorized may offer Immediate posting of payments (depending on payment type and risk model, may be
memo post)
• Usually cash, some checks and increasingly cards are used for payments
• Pre-paid telecom and cards
• Through authorized agents or biller store fronts
• Usually immediate posting to account or card (Convenience fee to consumer of $3 or more)
• Heavily cash, some checks and increasingly pre-paid and debit cards for telecom
2012. Property of Latente, LLC.
8. Consumer Payment Transactions
By Product Type
(billions of transactions)
160.6 CAGR
180 2.2 Other 0.2%
1.8
141.9
160
5.3 Alternative Online Payments 22.5%
2.0
0.7 5.5 4.3
2.3 2.7 2.5
3.5 Bank Bill Pay 18.5%
3
140 3.2
8.2
2.1
Online Biller Direct 13.0%
12.5
120 30.1
Prepaid Card 10.4%
27.5
100 ACH Check Conversion -5.0%
ACH Debit 12.0%
80 34.8
49.3
Check -8.1%
60
Credit Card 1.8%
40 Debit Card 7.2%
51.1 47.9
20 Cash -1.3%
0
2009 2014
Sources: Industry data; Latente analysis
2012. Property of Latente, LLC.
9. Bill Payment Market Size By Volume
24.9
Transactions (billions)
25 20.0 3.5
20 2.1 5.5 CAGR
3.0 ACH Debit 12.0%
1.9 13.0%
15 1.5 Online Biller Direct
2.3 Card 4.4%
5.3
Consolidated Bill Pay 18.5%
10
Check / Money Order
- -4.6%
_____
11.1 CAGR ALL TYPES 4.6%
5 8.8
0
2009 2014
Sources: Industry data; Latente analysis
2012. Property of Latente, LLC.
10. Comparing Bank Bill Pay and Biller Direct
Bank based usage is growing more rapidly and while both models will drive revenue
growth for vendors, Biller Direct is larger in terms of revenues.
Comparative Economics ($B)
Bank Bill Pay Biller Direct
5 yr. CAGR = 8%
5 yr. CAGR = 8% $2.6
$1.8
$1.3
$0.9
2009 2014 2009 2014
Transactions growing but on track to be over taken by Bank model.
Price compression will lower revenue per transaction but
Dynamic New entrants trying to find features to compete with Bank
increases in transactions will prop up revenue growth
consolidated bill pay advantages
Revenue Driver Transaction Growth Transaction Growth; Consumer Fees
Revenue Source Financial Institutions Primarily Receiving Payee; Consumers Secondary
Top 4 account for over 80% of the market with
Competitive Intensity Fragmented with Fiserv and Western Union as leaders
Fiserv/CheckFree dominant
Model is increasing in popularity and taking lead in terms of Often the starting place for first time bill payers. Billers continue to
Observations usage. Increased drive to integrate more tightly with e- prefer v. Consolidated model. As younger and latent adopters are
banking online and mobile to increase value and usage. less banked, Biller Direct or other biller friendly models may thrive
Downward pressure on pricing reduces margins; largest Biller direct is perceived to offer faster payment and more payment
Industry Trends banks seek control and pressure vendors on price and LCR; options (particularly cards); As E-Bill distribution grows Billers’
vendors responding with P2P and other value adds warm up to consolidated model if it saves them money.
11. Bill Direct Presentment and Payment Market (2011) is nearly $2.3B
Revenues By Product Type ($M)
$700
$600
$600
$500
$460 Distributed e-Bill
$410 Walk-in Convenience
$390
$400
Hosted Biller Direct
Walk-in Expedited
$300 Walk-in Prepaid Telecom
$225
Online Pre-paid telecom
On Demand
$200
$150
$100
$50
$-
Sources: Industry data; Latente analysis
2012. Property of Latente, LLC.
12. Penetration of Bank Bill Pay Varies Widely With
Significant Latent Upside
Estimated % of DDAs Subscribing to Online Bill Payment
By Bank Size
50
45
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
2012. Property of Latente, LLC.
13. Price Pressure Is On Bank Bill Pay Service
Providers But Varies by Bank Segment
Estimated. Annual
Change
Estimated Avg. Revenue / Transaction
Top 10 (8%)
Bank
Mid Tier (3%)
Bank
Community
Bank (3%)
Remittance
Only (10%)
0.00 0.20 0.40 0.60
Sources: Industry data; Latente analysis
2012. Property of Latente, LLC.
14. E-Bill Volume Is Growing, Potential Reach is Large
But Also Unrealized
Estimated Percentage of Bill Payment Transactions
100%
90%
80%
70%
60% e-Bills Not Distributed
e-Bills Scraped
50%
Unsubscribed e-Bills
40% e-Bills Paid
30%
20%
10%
0%
Sources: Industry data; Latente analysis
2012. Property of Latente, LLC.
16. Consolidated Bill Pay Competitors - Market Share of Top Four
Share of Bill Pay Users Share of Outsourced Bill Pay FIs
Fiserv FIS ORCC iPay/Jack Fiserv FIS ORCC iPay/Jack
100% 2 100%
3
90% 90%
20 30
80% 80%
70% 70%
10
60% 60%
50% 50%
25
40% 40%
75
30% 30%
20% 20%
35
10% 10%
0% 0%
Sources: Aite; Fiserv Bill Pay Life Cycle Survey; Industry data; Latente analysis
2012. Property of Latente, LLC.
17. Bill Payment Market Competitors
Competitor Associated Market Ecosystem Offerings Competitive Position
Revenue Share
Fiserv Consolidated: 60% • Bank Bill Pay, Remittance • Fiserv is the number 1 or 2 player in all the primary segments in
$600M • e-Bill presentment and which it competes; Dominates bank bill pay and e-Bill distribution
distribution thru banks
Biller: $325M
15% • Biller Direct bill payment • Top tier banks deliver 70% of revenue (CheckFree); BofA 30%
(Online, IVR, CSR) • Patented “risk” model delivers 80% next-day payments via ACH
• Walk-In bill payment • Biller direct strength in utility and telecom segments; lagging in
financial services verticals; overall On Demand market share 30%
• Nationwide walk-in Convenience pay agent network (35% share);
slow to no growth market
• Integration with Corillian online banking, Mcom Mobiliti banking,
and CashEdge Pop Money – all market leading products
FIS / Consolidated: 10% • Bank Bill Pay, Remittance • Metavante boosted FIS to #2 in bank bill pay
Metavante $100M • e-Bill presentment • Focus is small to mid-sized FIs
• Biller Direct payment (IVR, • Smaller FI reach reduces value of e-Bill distribution – most of their
Biller: $20M
1% CSR, Online) e-Bill content is scraped rather than direct from the Biller
• Statement Formatting • Compete heavily on price and bundling with other payment services
(software) • Biller market is generally not a significant focus for FIS, but
strategically marketed to improve competitive position v. Fiserv
ORCC Consolidated: 5% • Bank Bill Pay, Remittance • At best number three player in most markets
$55M • e-Bill presentment • Well-regarded for integrated online banking and bill payment
• Biller Direct payment (IVR, product, ease of use, and budget management features
Biller: $55M
3% CSR, Online) • Risk model uses debit networks which is more expensive than ACH
• eLockbox • Strongest in the small and mid-market for banks and billers
• Uses eLockbox to gain greater share of wallet with small Billers
18. Bill Payment Market Competitors – cont’d.
Competitor Associated Market Ecosystem Offerings Competitive Position
Revenue Share
iPay/Jack Consoli- 5% • Bank Bill Pay, Remittance • Focus on reseller partnerships with online banking and other financial
Henry dated: • e-Bill presentment technology providers
• Regarded for tight integration with partners’ solutions
$50M
• Products easy to implement, low TCO
• e-Bill content available is all scraped
Western Biller: 25% • Biller Direct bill payment • Dominant provider in money transfer with nationwide agent network
Union $575M (IVR, CSR, Online) • Number 1 or 2 player in most Biller segments in which it competes
• Walk-In convenience bill • Western Union dominates the Walk-In Expedited Payments market
payment (60% share); heavily tilted to financial services (e.g., consumer credit).
• Walk-In expedited bill Has used with Speedpay (On Demand payments) to build share (45%)
payment particularly with financial services billers
• With wide spread adoption of bank bill pay and faster payment options
there, Expedited walk-in business is weakening
• Small but growing in fast growing pre-paid telecom market
Money Biller: 6% • Walk-In convenience bill • Competes against Western Union in the Walk-In Expedited segment
Gram $135M payment (heavily financial services) with about 30% market share; and a very
• Walk-In bill expedited bill minor player in Walk-In Convenience segment (less than 5%)
payment • MoneyGram has not made major efforts to compete outside of walk-in
• Recently signed a deal with Fiserv to enable Emergency Payments via
Fiserv’s bank billpay
IPP Biller: 2% • Walk-In convenience bill • Competes against Fiserv in walk-in convenience market (20% share)
$45M payment • Has a simpler off the shelf solution (browser-based) that is less
• Walk-In prepaid telecom expensive to implement for agents
• IPP competes heavily on price
• Focused on non-contracted segment and selectively going after
smaller authorized billers who get less attention from Fiserv
• Also distributes cell phones for its wireless telecom clients