Presentation given by Edye Kyper
at University of California, Davis
Program in International & Community Nutrition
March 30, 2016
The presentation describes food systems for nutrition, and the role for agricultural extension through overview of INGENAES concept and its approach to nutrition promotion.
2. Outline
• Food systems for nutrition, and the role for
agricultural extension
• Overview of INGENAES concept
• INGENAES approach to nutrition
promotion
• Nutrition-related activities underway
• Discussion
3. Why Agriculture for Nutrition?
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• Nutrition-specific interventions, if
implemented at 90% coverage, would
address 20% of global stunting burden
nutrition-sensitive interventions from other
key sectors that address the key determinants of
malnutrition are essential to reaching the other
80%
agriculture produces food, and plays an
important role in partnership with other sectors
in ensuring good nutrition for all
8. What we stand for
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
IN
GE
N
A
E
S
9.
10. Who we are – UCD Team
Mark Bell Amanda Crump Nikki Grey
Rutamu
Liz Hohenberger Edye Kuyper Laina Schneider
11. How Agricultural Extension Operates
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• Agricultural extension staff forge
strong trust relationships in the
communities where they work
• Agricultural advisory services
influence production and
management decisions, support
farmer association• Many services rely on the “old” model:
male agents advise male farmers on how
to grow more staples and/or cash crops
• Agents have introduced crops that have
displaced crops traditionally grown and/or
marketed by women, may be less
12. Why INGENAES?
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• Women comprise 43% of the global agricultural
labor force, yet:
– They are not well represented in agricultural
extension services,
– Women farmers are infrequently reached by
extension,
– Services are not tailored to the unique needs
of women
13. Why INGENAES?
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• Despite decades of investment, agricultural
development has not improved nutrition at the
micro level.
– Agricultural interventions often negatively
impact nutrition
– Agricultural projects positively impact child
nutrition when:
• nutrition is planned for,
• women are empowered, and
• nutrition education is included
14. What Make INGENAES Different?
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• AES is solidly situated in the agricultural
sector;
– Many other agriculture-nutrition projects add
agricultural components to health-focused
projects
• Women’s empowerment is an end unto
itself
– Not just a facilitator of improved child
nutrition
• Nutrition objectives consider entire family
15. How INGENAES Operates
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• Activities underway in Bangladesh,
Zambia, Nepal, and Honduras
• Demand-driven:
– in-country partners are engaged to
understand what we can offer,
– plan to address local needs created in
partnership with local partners
• Context-specific, addressing pluralistic
extension
16. Challenges to Nutrition Promotion in AES
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• Competing demands, priorities for AES staff
– Extension for production, income?
– Or for food & nutrition security, family well-
being?
– Other “extras”: conservation ag, market linkages…
• Limited nutrition knowledge
– What do staff need to know?
– What should be left to health frontline workers?
• General capacity limitations
– Poor coverage, high vacancy rates, etc.
– Didactic approach to training/knowledge transfer
17. Nutrition Promotion in INGENAES
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• Support year-round food & nutrition
security
• Diversify production
• Improve postharvest handling (storage,
processing, transport to market…)
• Improve water, sanitation and hygiene
(WASH) especially as it’s impacted by
agriculture
• Empower women and engage men to
improve household nutrition
18. Nutrition Promotion in INGENAES: the How
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• Understand AES staff roles, responsibilities
• Identify openings for nutrition:
– To the extent possible, integrate with existing
activities
• Motivate, convict staff to act on nutrition
• Model participatory, 2-way learning:
– AES staff have something to learn from
farmers, and vice versa; training-of-trainers
models approach
19. Steps in the Process
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• What are the nutrition objectives?
– Refer to national, int’l nutrition goals (more on this
later)
– Understand local nutrition concerns
• E.g. stunting prevalence? Micronutrient deficiency?
Overweight/obesity? Food security situation?
• What locally-available foods can address these
objectives?
• Farm families’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices:
– What do farm families already know?
– What do they do?
– If knowledge ≠ practices, what keeps families from
doing what they know?
• Identify actions that AES can undertake to address
gaps in knowledge, practice
20. Reinforce Other Evidence-Based Messages
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• Food-Based Dietary Guidelines, when they
exist
• Scaling Up Nutrition (SUN)
– Zambia, Malawi, other African countries promote
platform of specific activities (related to ENA/EHA)
• 1,000 Days
• Adolescent girls’ nutrition
• Sustainable diets, biodiversity
• All while focusing on food-based nutrition for
the whole family
22. Next Steps:
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• The “what” and the “how” presented here will
feed into the competency framework
• The competency framework will provide a
foundation for training efforts
• Potential nutrition training development
workshop to be held in summer 2016
• Resulting “canned” training can be fine-tuned
to address needs of local context
23. Harmonizing Nutrition Information
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
Challenge:
• Rural households receive different and sometimes
contradictory nutrition information from one NGO or
government entity to the next
• Farmers are confused and less likely to act on
recommendations; dietary behaviors are unlikely to change
Response:
• Support capacity of
MoA to develop strong
nutrition-sensitive
trainings, national
FBDG Photo: K. Cook, Zambia 2016
24. Context-specific monitoring & evaluation tools
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
Challenge:
• No clear “M&E toolbox”
available for understanding how
and whether AES is contributing
to gender equity, improved
nutrition
Response:
• IAPRI to survey, field test,
disseminate M&E tools
appropriate for AES in Zambia
Dr Rhoda
Mofya-
Mukuka,
lead
researcher
25. Developing Simple Tip, Fact Sheets
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
Challenge:
• AES staff need basic, straightforward information
• Many existing nutrition training materials are in
manual format, or intended for health
implementers
Response:
• UC Davis producing “tip sheets” (summarize an
issue, give advice, and provide tangible activities)
• and “fact sheets” (brief explanation of a concept or
a framework)
• “Eating Well, Staying Well”, “How Foods Help”,
26. Process Evaluation Throughout
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
– Fidelity: Are trainings implemented as intended?
– Dose Delivered: are all training components
delivered?
– Dose Received :
• instructors incorporate content into existing efforts
• trainee satisfaction, comprehension
– Reach: participation of both trainers and trainees
– Recruitment
– Context: organizational issues facilitating,
impeding delivery & uptake of training
27. How to preserve content integrity when paring
information back to the very basics?
28. DISCLAIMER: This presentation was made possible by the generous support of the American people
through the United States Agency for International Development, USAID. The contents are the
responsibility of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of USAID or the United States
Photo: Mark Bell
29. Example: Promoting production diversity
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• Attitudes/perceptions required:
– Conviction that nutrition is
important
– Confidence that farmers will act (in
contrast to belief that farmers are
ignorant or won’t change)
• Skills required:
– Can conduct participatory nutrition
assessment
– Can support farmers in identifying,
growing, marketing, buying,
• Knowledge required:
– Functions of foods, food-based dietary guidelines (where
available)
– the role that local foods can play to
address nutrient gaps
Malawi food groups
30. Example: Water, Sanitation, and Hygiene
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• Relevant actions:
– Practice safe irrigation (limit run-
off, etc.)
– Manage manure appropriately
– Wash hands with soap after
working with animals,
agrichemicals, other pollutants
– Treat and store drinking water
safely
• Knowledge:
– In addition to food, nutrition is impacted by health status
– Infection resulting from unsanitary environments
undermines nutrition
– Agricultural practices have implications for environmental
health
Photo: E. Kuyper, Haiti 2012
31. Example: Plan for year-round food & nutrition
security
Photo:DanQuinn,HorticultureInnovation
Lab
• With farmers, consider times of
seasonal food & nutrition
insecurity
– Consider availability of all the food
groups
• Use seasonal calendars to plant,
harvest foods that will address
shortfalls
• Support farmers with access to
seeds, markets for foods not
• Consider livestock/husbandry
practices, implications for food,
micronutrient availability Photo: E. Kuyper, Nepal
Editor's Notes
Presentation given by Edye Kyper
at University of California Davis
Program in International & Community Nutrition
March 30, 2016
_____________
We realize it’s misspelled, but we choose to pronounce this acronym, “ingenious”.
Today I’ll present some of the content that will be included in a technical note that is still in draft form. My objectives for this presentation are to share with you what aspects of nutrition are relevant to AES, and what extension and INGENAES need to do to support better nutrition.
I also seek your feedback and support for this process and will share opportunities for collaboration at the end.
This presentation follows up one I made at PICN seminar 2 years ago, when Steve Vosti & I described the burgeoning conversation about nutrition-sensitive agriculture.
Amanda Crump, my colleague in the INGENAES project and in the Horticulture Innovation Lab, also introduced the INGENAES project in PICN seminar last year
It builds on the framework developed by other researchers to describe how agriculture can support nutrition,
The INGENAES project is designed to address several of these pieces by testing and describing approaches to contextualize the abstract, and thereby identify whether, how, and in what circumstances agricultural extension can support better nutrition and gender outcomes.
For today, I’ll be focusing primarily on the nutrition-related aspects of the project, with the understanding that gender is an imperative objective on its own, and that gender equity can facilitate better nutrition.
2013 Lancet series (specifically the paper by Zulfi Bhutta) showed that…
How many of you have seen this, or another conceptual framework for how agriculture can impact nutrition? (if not, talk through)
This framework developed by the SPRING project (Strengthening Partnerships, Results and Innovation for Nutrition Globally) is similar to others that build on the UNICEF framework to identify the role/s that agriculture can play in improving child nutrition
What I’d especially like to draw attention to is the first green column of boxes, what’s become known as the pathways from ag to nutrition, often referred to as, “own consumption”, “income for purchase & consumption”, and “women’s empowerment”.
The University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign is the prime awardee, and partners with the University of California-Davis, the University of Florida, and Cultural Practice, LLC.
Why would agricultural extension services benefit from better integration of gender & nutrition?
Efforts to date have not been effective in improving gender equity and nutrition; reviews of the evidence suggest that in order to be effective,
Stunting improves at macro level with increased income, but not in farming households; obesity also increases
The “development case” and the “business case”
Why would agricultural extension services benefit from better integration of gender & nutrition?
Efforts to date have not been effective in improving gender equity and nutrition; reviews of the evidence suggest that in order to be effective,
Stunting improves at macro level with increased income, but not in farming households; obesity also increases
The “development case” and the “business case”
Pluralistic extension = gov’t & NGO, theoretically includes commercial agricultural extension but they have been a lesser priority in our efforts.
This is not an exhaustive list, but rather a snapshot of issues that especially make it hard for AES to address nutrition
(don’t need to be experts)
Since AES is engaged in the production, processing, marketing of food, it is best positioned to increase the supply of healthy foods for families’ own consumption as well as for the marketplace
I would say that there is growing consensus around these actions, but they may not be exhaustive and the local context will determine which ones are most important
Also important to consider the degree to which AES can support the demand side, potentially in cooperation with health & education sector colleagues
The “how” is not necessarily specific to efforts to improve nutrition, and most translate well to efforts to improve gender equity.
But they are essential: decades of experience and research demonstrate that didactic sharing of information is ineffective in changing people’s dietary (and other) behaviors
HANDS Framework developed by Lydia Clemmons at the Manoff Group, and implemented in Ethiopia and Tanzania (to date)
Accompanying products include a decision-making game
As nutrition has become a priority for more & more funders and projects, (SLIDE)
To address this challenge, Zambian MoA and INGENAES convened 37 stakeholders (>20 organizations) January 28 to discuss challenges, and highlight promising practices
INGENAES, MoA will maintain momentum by:
field testing nutrition messages aligned with extension guidelines
Facilitating communication
Ultimately, providing strong guidance from MoA on nutrition messages that are relevant to agriculture, and disseminate broadly among stakeholders
At the beginning, I mentioned how agricultural development hasn’t historically led to improvements in nutrition, particularly among young children. Part of that may be due to inadequate measurement tools, and a there is growing interest in ensuring that ag projects are measuring the right things as they seek to impact nutrition, but (bullet 1).
Each funder has different priorities, requires different indicators
so that we can answer the “why?”
Tweaked from health services/delivery to health promotion
very relevant to INGENAES training activities in particular
Can provide publication upon request
“reach” includes barriers to participation, consideration of those reaches as well as those NOT reached
For discussion: how can these measures be incorporated at field level?
I’m open to answering any questions, but would particularly like to discuss now and in the future how (SLIDE TEXT)
Considering the audience (busy field staff, moderate education) how to make info concise without losing
Presentation given by Edye Kyper
at University of California Davis
Program in International & Community Nutrition
March 30, 2016