This document summarizes a group evaluation of a project. Things that went well included having experience with the editing software, a large selection of shots to choose from, and good collaboration where members contributed ideas or took on supporting roles. Things that didn't go well were some unusable out-of-focus shots, the time it took to construct the timeline from many shots, and needing to change the opening structure and production credits due to unavailable shots.

1. Our group evaluation

2. Things that went well:
 Due to the fact that we’ve used Final Cut Pro
before it was easy for us to control, when editing.
 We had a large range of shots, so we were able to
choose the best to use.
 Whilst two people were responsible for editing, the
others were able to either produce music or blog
posts.
 Everyone contributed their ideas and thoughts, in
which would improve the quality of our opening.
 We particularly found it enjoyable to watch the
shots we had, when constructing the timeline, as
some we found humorous.
 We all equally swapped roles during the editing
process.

3. Thing’s that didn’t go well:
 Some of the shots we had, we were unable to use,
due to them being out of focus.
 Due to the large amount of shots we had, it took a
long duration of time to construct our timeline.
 Due to us not being able to use some shots we had
to change the structure of our opening to a narrative
opening, with the titles intercut on a black screen.
 We also had to change the production and
distribution companies, to one’s a little more
appropriate.
A screen-shot of the
construction of our
timeline, in which took a
large amount of time.