The document discusses the concepts of diplomacy and world politics from both macro and micro perspectives. From a macro view, diplomacy refers to the fundamental process of communication between political entities that helps create stability in the global system by resolving conflicts through dialogue and negotiation. From a micro view, diplomacy provides insights into how international actors like states behave in the system and can be used as an instrument to achieve their foreign policy goals through direct negotiations or other methods. The document then outlines some key features of traditional diplomacy, including its state-based structure with permanent embassies, bilateral and secretive processes, and narrow agenda focused on issues of war, peace and personal monarchical ambitions.
The prime objective of a state is to improve the quality of life of its citizens. For this, the state formulates a comprehensive set of interdependent policies.
Foreign policy is one such policy formulated to achieve the above objectives by utilizing the foreign relations of a country
Multiple constants & variables determine the foreign policy of a country; This presentation attempts to explain those determinants
Its word version is available on my website mentioned above. You will find many other articles and presentations there
JR.Childs wrote, “The foreign policy of a state is the substance of foreign relations, whereas diplomacy is a process by which policies carried out. “ Similarly, Sir Harold Nicholson wrote, “Foreign policy is based on a general conception of national requirements…. Diplomacy, on the other hand, it’s not an end but a mean, not a purpose but a method. It is the agency through which foreign policy seeks to attain its purpose by agreement rather than by war.”
The crux of the whole debate is that diplomacy is the method and foreign policy is the substance, which is executed by the use of diplomatic technique.
The prime objective of a state is to improve the quality of life of its citizens. For this, the state formulates a comprehensive set of interdependent policies.
Foreign policy is one such policy formulated to achieve the above objectives by utilizing the foreign relations of a country
Multiple constants & variables determine the foreign policy of a country; This presentation attempts to explain those determinants
Its word version is available on my website mentioned above. You will find many other articles and presentations there
JR.Childs wrote, “The foreign policy of a state is the substance of foreign relations, whereas diplomacy is a process by which policies carried out. “ Similarly, Sir Harold Nicholson wrote, “Foreign policy is based on a general conception of national requirements…. Diplomacy, on the other hand, it’s not an end but a mean, not a purpose but a method. It is the agency through which foreign policy seeks to attain its purpose by agreement rather than by war.”
The crux of the whole debate is that diplomacy is the method and foreign policy is the substance, which is executed by the use of diplomatic technique.
How the theories and practices of Diplomacy change in the 20th century due to the influential role of non-traditional actors in international politics. Finally, it is discussed why the State remains the central actor to conduct diplomacy.
11 Secret Intelligence, Covert Action and Clandestine Diplom.docxhyacinthshackley2629
11 Secret Intelligence, Covert Action
and Clandestine Diplomacy
Len Scott
‘The essential skill of a secret service is to get things done secretly and deniably.’
(John Bruce Lockhart, former Deputy Chief of SIS)1
Much contemporary study of intelligence concerns how knowledge is acquired,
generated and used. This chapter provides a different focus that treats secrecy,
rather than knowledge, as an organising theme. Instead of scrutinising the process
of gathering, analysing and exploiting intelligence, it examines other activities of
secret intelligence services, often termed covert action. This broader framework
draws upon both pre-modern ‘Secret Service’ activities that predated modern
intelligence organisations,2 as well as many Cold War studies. It resonates with
the perspective of Richard Aldrich that secret service activity includes ‘operations to
influence the world by unseen means – the hidden hand’.3 Exploration of secret
intervention illuminates important themes and issues in the study of intelligence,
and identifies challenges and opportunities for enquiry, particularly in the context
of the British experience. One further aspect is examined and developed – the
role of secret intelligence services in conducting clandestine diplomacy, a
neglected yet intriguing dimension that also provides insights into the study of
intelligence.
Many intelligence services perform tasks other than gathering secret intel-
ligence. Conversely, intelligence activities are conducted by organisations other
than secret intelligence services. The relationship between organisation and
function varies over time and place. In wartime Britain, for example, the Secret
Intelligence Service (SIS) conducted espionage and the Special Operations
Executive (SOE) was responsible for special operations.4 While the CIA con-
ducted much US Cold War propaganda, in Britain the Information Research
Department was part of the Foreign Office.5 In the United States, covert para-
military action has long been undertaken by the Department of Defense,6 while
there is a veritable plethora of US government agencies with intelligence gathering
capabilities. And in the wake of September 11 the CIA has expanded its
paramilitary capabilities (evident in Afghanistan) while the Pentagon appears
committed to developing Special Forces able to conduct their own intelligence
Secret Intelligence and Clandestine Diplomacy 163
gathering. Notwithstanding the fact that different tasks are performed by
different organisations, since 1945 Western intelligence services have never-
theless used the same organisations and the same groups of people to perform
different tasks.
For many observers, and especially for many critics, secret intervention is
synonymous with intelligence and loomed large in Cold War debates about the
legitimacy and morality of intelligence organisations and their activities. Since
September 11, Washington’s agenda for taking the offensive to the United States’
enemie.
World War Ii Essay. The Consequences of World War II: Example of Couse and Ef...Keisha Paulino
The Consequences of World War II: Example of Couse and Effect Essay .... About World War II - Free Essay Example | PapersOwl.com. World war 2 essay example. World War II: [Essay Example], 1360 words .... World War II Essay - Essay Introduction: Hook: "God and history will .... Essay on World War II- Australian Historian | History - Year 12 VCE .... Essays on world war ii - essayuniversity.web.fc2.com. History and World War II Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays .... World War 2 Essay | Essay on World War 2 for Students and Children in .... World War 2 Essay Example for Free - 1041 Words | EssayPay. World War II Essay Test. Causes of World War II Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays .... World War II Essay - WWII Essay Political economic and social reasons .... Essays world war two - copywriterbiohorizons.x.fc2.com. Essay On World War 2 - YouTube. Hooks for Writing an Essay about World War II. Leaders of World War II Essay Questions, Part Five - WriteBonnieRose.com. Women world war ii essay - presentationbackgrounds.web.fc2.com. Essay on Humanity from World War II by Education Turnpike | TpT. World War II Paper - Free Essay Example | PapersOwl.com. Second World War essay - A-Level History - Marked by Teachers.com. Sample History Research Paper Summary on The World War II. causes of ww2 essay. Essay websites: World war ii essay. Read «World War II» Essay Sample for Free at SupremeEssays.com. Essays about the causes of world war 2. Narrative essay: Essay about world war 2. WWII Essay work November 13th. World war 2 research essay. essay assistance. World War II and Advancing Technology Essay Example | Topics and Well .... Women world war ii essay - pdfeports867.web.fc2.com. History world war 2 essays. Germany, Hitler, and World War II Essays in ... World War Ii Essay
The Impact of Translation Services on Diplomacy and International Relations f...TheSpanishGroupLLC
In the realm of diplomacy and international relations, effective communication is key. The United States, as a global superpower, relies heavily on translation services to facilitate interactions with foreign governments, organizations, and individuals. These services play a crucial role in ensuring that messages are accurately conveyed, cultural nuances are respected, and diplomatic efforts are successful. Let's explore the significant impact of translation services on the US's diplomatic endeavors and international relations.
Sharpen existing tools or get a new toolbox? Contemporary cluster initiatives...Orkestra
UIIN Conference, Madrid, 27-29 May 2024
James Wilson, Orkestra and Deusto Business School
Emily Wise, Lund University
Madeline Smith, The Glasgow School of Art
Acorn Recovery: Restore IT infra within minutesIP ServerOne
Introducing Acorn Recovery as a Service, a simple, fast, and secure managed disaster recovery (DRaaS) by IP ServerOne. A DR solution that helps restore your IT infra within minutes.
This presentation by Morris Kleiner (University of Minnesota), was made during the discussion “Competition and Regulation in Professions and Occupations” held at the Working Party No. 2 on Competition and Regulation on 10 June 2024. More papers and presentations on the topic can be found out at oe.cd/crps.
This presentation was uploaded with the author’s consent.
Have you ever wondered how search works while visiting an e-commerce site, internal website, or searching through other types of online resources? Look no further than this informative session on the ways that taxonomies help end-users navigate the internet! Hear from taxonomists and other information professionals who have first-hand experience creating and working with taxonomies that aid in navigation, search, and discovery across a range of disciplines.
This presentation, created by Syed Faiz ul Hassan, explores the profound influence of media on public perception and behavior. It delves into the evolution of media from oral traditions to modern digital and social media platforms. Key topics include the role of media in information propagation, socialization, crisis awareness, globalization, and education. The presentation also examines media influence through agenda setting, propaganda, and manipulative techniques used by advertisers and marketers. Furthermore, it highlights the impact of surveillance enabled by media technologies on personal behavior and preferences. Through this comprehensive overview, the presentation aims to shed light on how media shapes collective consciousness and public opinion.
0x01 - Newton's Third Law: Static vs. Dynamic AbusersOWASP Beja
f you offer a service on the web, odds are that someone will abuse it. Be it an API, a SaaS, a PaaS, or even a static website, someone somewhere will try to figure out a way to use it to their own needs. In this talk we'll compare measures that are effective against static attackers and how to battle a dynamic attacker who adapts to your counter-measures.
About the Speaker
===============
Diogo Sousa, Engineering Manager @ Canonical
An opinionated individual with an interest in cryptography and its intersection with secure software development.
2. Introduction
Diplomacy is one the most broad-spectrum terms in
IR: it can mean different things depending upon the
user and the usage
Macro perspective: to make sense of the world politics
as a whole
Micro perspective: attempts to explain international
politics from the actors’ perspectives
Traditionally: micro perspective emphases on states’
perspectives; but the world has changed and it is no
longer so
2
3. Introduction
Similarly, frequent use of the term ‘diplomacy’ makes a
reader confused as to what it might mean
For example: great power diplomacy; summit
diplomacy; water diplomacy; birthday diplomacy
Often the term seems synonymous with foreign policy
or world politics
Specially media reports make it much wider than the
concept actually entails
3
4. Introduction
More confusions: links to international relations and international
history is referred as ‘diplomatic history’: definition?
Reference to British diplomacy, American diplomacy or Chinese
diplomacy—not referring to diplomacy as such but the entire gamut
of foreign policy
Therefore: the use of the term is not done in a professional way
However: while it is misleading but at least it alerts us that
diplomacy is central to an understanding of the global system of
world politics and to the foreign policies of states and other actors
in international politics
4
5. Introduction
From a macro perspective of world politics, it refers to
a process of communication that is central to the
working of the system
If we characterize world politics simply as tensions
between conflict and cooperation, diplomacy can be
placed within the spectrum of cooperation where we
tend to resolve conflict/war through dialogues and
negotiations
It is therefore fundamental for creating stability in the
system with an objective to preventing conflicts
spilling to war
5
6. Introduction
From a micro perspective of international actors like
states, an understanding of diplomacy provides
insights into the behavior of states/actors themselves
in the global system
From this perspective, diplomacy is seen as an
instrument rather than a global process
All actors have goals and ends towards which their
foreign policy behavior is directed
In order to achieve ends, they need some means, i.e.,
instruments (diplomacy)
6
7. Introduction
Actors can use diplomacy as a direct method, i.e.,
through direct negotiations with the party involved;
often known as ‘pure diplomacy’
They can also use a mixed method through threats of
using violence or any other methods
7
8. Diplomacy and World
Politics
Diplomacy as a communication process among
political entities has existed literally thousands of years
The earliest diplomatic document (discovered in 1970s)
is a letter inscribed in a tablet dated around 2,500 BC
From present day Middle East to Northern Iraq: the
messenger travelled 2,000 km of distance:
8
9. Significance of the Earliest
Found Diplomatic Code
We have evidence of a fully-fledged diplomatic system;
a working relationship between two distant kingdoms;
the use of an emissary to convey a letter over a long distance;
protocol, including the concept of equal status, an understood
medium of communication, and a conventional form of address;
A domestic organization for making and implementing foreign
policy;
an archive; a set of normative expectations about right and proper
behavior;
a sense of ... fellowship or brotherhood;
trade or reciprocal gift-giving via envoys.
9
10. Traditional Diplomacy
While the conventions and machinery of diplomacy
have evolved over a long historical period, the city-
states in Ancient Greece, for example, introduced a
diplomatic system that had many remarkably modern
features
our global diplomatic system has its origins in
fifteenth-century Italy where permanent embassies
were first established
10
11. Traditional Diplomacy
A ‘traditional’ diplomatic system developed thereafter which had
some distinctive features
These can be usefully characterized under the headings of structure,
process, and agenda-broadly relating to
who was involved in diplomacy,
how diplomatic activity was organized, and
the substance of diplomacy
This framework will help us to compare traditional diplomacy with
diplomatic systems that preceded it and those that followed.
11
12. Structure
Traditional diplomacy can be distinguished from its predecessors in
the ancient and medieval worlds primarily because it constituted a
communications process between recognizably modern states
rather than between other forms of political organization like, for
example, the Catholic Church
As relations between states expanded, political leaders (usually
monarchs) found it increasingly necessary to negotiate with each
other on a regular basis
12
13. Structure
But, given the distances involved, negotiations had to
be indirect and diplomats were sent abroad for this
purpose
If diplomacy as a state-based activity is central to the
structure of traditional diplomacy, diplomatic agents
acting on behalf of states later became
institutionalized and eventually professionalized
13
14. Structure
Institutionalization refers to particular bodies that
emerged which had diplomacy as their main function
and diplomacy ceased to be an irregular activity
undertaken by ad hoc representatives
It is the Italian city-states were the first to establish
permanent, resident missions or embassies abroad and
other states in Europe soon followed their lead.
14
15. Structure
The advantages of permanent representation abroad
included practicality and continuity.
Embassies became an important embodiment of state
interests and a network of permanent embassies later
became linked to specialized foreign departments
established within home states
The institutionalization of diplomacy with a dedicated
workforce of diplomats at home and abroad was
followed by the professionalization of diplomacy as an
occupation
15
16. Process
In the traditional system, diplomacy was organized
largely on a bilateral (two-party) basis and usually
undertaken in secrecy
When two states developed a relationship of mutual
importance, it became normal to exchange permanent
embassies and to conduct diplomacy through those
embassies on a state-to-state basis
Unless one state forced the other to accept a position,
mutual agreement was the only means of achieving a
settlement of any disputes.
16
17. Process
Limiting the relationship to two parties, of course,
made it easier to keep negotiations secret, although
there were other good reasons in terms of the
negotiating process itself for maintaining as much
secrecy as possible
The traditional process of diplomacy also drew upon
rules and procedures for behavior from earlier
diplomatic systems
From the fifteenth century onwards, diplomacy
became not just a regular process but also a
regularized process
17
18. Process
Procedural rules known as diplomatic protocol were
developed which included rather ostentatious
ceremonies and also more practical procedures
relating to such things as the order in which a treaty is
signed by the parties involved in a negotiation
A series of rights, privileges, and immunities became
attached both to diplomats and to diplomatic
activities.
18
19. Process
These derived from two principles.
The first essentially practical consideration was that diplomats
should be able to conduct their business without fear or hindrance
The popular phrase ‘don’t shoot the messenger!’ not only suggests
the need to safeguard the messenger who does not deserve to be
blamed for the content of the message carried, but also indicates
the importance of safeguarding the whole system of
communications between international actors.
19
20. Process
The second principle was derived from the idea that the ambassador
in particular is the direct representative of a sovereign monarch and,
therefore, should be treated with the same consideration that a
monarch would receive
This idea of representation was expanded to include the
controversial idea of extraterritoriality which in this context simply
means that the resident embassy abroad is regarded as part of the
territory of the home state and subject to the laws of that state and,
likewise, that the resident diplomatic staff are subject only to the
laws of the home state.
20
21. Agenda
Traditional diplomacy can be characterized finally by
its agenda-what issues did diplomats negotiate about?
The important point to note here is that the agenda of
traditional diplomacy was narrow certainly by
comparison with later periods
Not only was the agenda set by the relatively
underdeveloped state of bilateral relations but, more
importantly, the preoccupations of diplomacy reflected
the preoccupations of political leaders themselves.
21
22. Agenda
For hundreds of years, foreign policy was seen as the exclusive
province of monarchs and their advisers and, not surprisingly,
personal ambitions—the acquisition of territory perhaps, or another
throne-together with more general issues of war and peace
constituted the most important issues on the diploma tic agenda
In a highly personalized structure, diplomats in essence were sent
abroad by one monarch to win over another
Failure to do so would bring upon severe consequences on
diplomats
22
23. Agenda
This prompted at least one cynical definition of a diplomat as ‘an
honest man sent abroad to lie on behalf of his country’
In general, however, it was quickly discovered that honesty rather
than deceit is more likely to be effective in achieving objectives,
whatever short-term gains might be made by more duplicitous
behavior
Traditional diplomacy reached its most developed form and was
arguably most effective as a system for ordering international
relations in nineteenth-century Europe
This is the period known, in a classic piece of historical
overstatement, as the ‘century of peace’ in Europe.
23
24. New Diplomacy
However successful traditional diplomacy may have been in
promoting stability, order, and peace in nineteenth-century Europe,
its failure to prevent the First World War and, for some indeed, its
role in actually causing that war, led to a widespread belief that a
new form of diplomacy was needed
Though this was commonly referred to after the First World War as
the ‘new’ diplomacy, elements of this allegedly new form of
diplomacy were already in evidence in the nineteenth century if not
before, and there was a long transition period between traditional
forms and the new system of diplomacy that evolved in the first half
of the twentieth century
24
25. New Diplomacy
What was identifiably new about the ‘new’ diplomacy emerged from
two important ideas
First, there was a demand that diplomacy should be more open to
public scrutiny and control.
This demand related less to a public involvement in the process than
to the provision of information to the public about agreements
reached
This focused attention on two interlinked elements of traditional
diplomacy that were now seen to be problematic: excessive secrecy
and the fact that diplomats were normally members of a closed
social elite-the aristocracy.
25
26. New Diplomacy
The second idea related to the importance of establishing an
international organization which initially took the form of the
League of Nations after the First World War-that would act both
as an international forum for the peaceful settlement of disputes and
as a deterrent against another world war by the threat of collective
action against potential aggressors
Historically then the new diplomacy represented the widespread
hope for a new start after 1918.
26
27. Structure
The structure of the new diplomacy remained similar in
form to traditional diplomacy to the extent that states
and governments remained the major actors in this
system and were represented internationally by what
was now a well-established network of permanent
embassies abroad attached to foreign departments at
home
27
28. Structure
There are two important changes to note, however, that have
implications not only for the structure but also for the processes and
the issues that characterized the new diplomacy.
First, states were no Ionger the only actors involved
Increasingly, they had to share the international stage with other
actors such as international organizations which were also engaged
in diplomacy
These organizations were of two types, intergovernmental (with
governments only as members) and non-governmental (with private
individuals and groups as members).
28
29. Structure
The second important change to note is that governments
themselves were beginning to change in terms of the scope of their
activities and the extent to which they sought to regulate the lives of
their citizens, Where once they had simply provided for the physical
security of their citizens they now had broader concern with their
social and economic well-being
Thus, the twentieth century saw an important change from the so-
called ‘nightwatchman state’ to the ‘welfare state’
This has implications for the range of issues that states needed to
negotiate about in their international activity.
29
30. Process
The changing interests of states as international actors and the
growing number of non-state actors involved changed the nature of
the new diplomacy as a process of negotiation
Most obviously, it made diplomacy a more complex activity
involving more and different actors
States continued to negotiate bilaterally with each other on a state-
to-state basis
Then groups of states typically negotiated multilaterally through the
auspices of intergovernmental organizations like the League of
Nations and its successor the United Nations and, increasingly, with
the growing range of non-governmental organizations which sought
to influence inter-state behavior to achieve their own objectives.
30
31. Process
While multilateral diplomacy was not new as practiced
during the nineteenth century but it was the sheer
number and volume of actors that provided it with a
new procedural format
However: the new diplomacy was a more open process
than its predecessor because it was more difficult to
keep secret a process involving so many different
actors
31
32. Agenda
The agenda of the new diplomacy contained a number of new issues
as well as a reinforced emphasis on military security
The avoidance of war now became a priority as the ‘new’ diplomats
sought to make the First World War ‘the war to end all wars’, but
diplomatic activity also began to focus more on economic, social,
and welfare issues relating to material well-being
These became known as ‘low politics’ issues in contrast to the ‘high
politics’ issues associated with the traditional diploma tic agenda
32
33. Agenda
These new issues reflected not only the wider interests
and responsibilities of governments but also the often
narrowly focused interests of non-state actors.
The other distinctive feature of the new agenda is that
it increasingly featured highly specialized issues that
raised questions about the adequacy of the training
given to diplomats.
33
34. Agenda
lf the specialization required of new diplomats challenged their
competence, their distinctive role was also challenged by two other
trends:
the direct role political leaders themselves often played in diplomacy,
and
the growing tendency of political leaders in the inter-war period to
appoint personal envoys to represent them
Clearly, professional diplomats were no longer the only ‘players’
involved in the new diplomatic ‘game’ and they enjoyed far less
autonomy than traditional diplomats had enjoyed in earlier periods
34
35. Cold War Diplomacy
The term ‘cold war diplomacy’ refers to some very
specific aspects of diplomacy that emerged after the
Second World War: Cold War from the late 1940s until
the end of the 1980s
The diplomatic activity associated with ‘East-West’
confrontation had a single dramatic focus-the absolute
necessity of avoiding a global, nuclear conflict that
could destroy the intenational system.
35
36. Types of Cold war Diplomacy
Nuclear diplomacy: refers to the interactions between
nuclear-armed states where one or more of them
threatens to use nuclear weapons either to dissuade
an opponent from undertaking an action (deterrence)
or to persuade them to call a halt to some action that
has begun (compellence)
36
37. Types of Cold war Diplomacy
Crisis diplomacy: refers to the delicate communications
and negotiations involved in a crisis. A crisis may be
defined as a short, intensive period in which the
possibility of (nuclear) war is perceived to increase
dramatically
From this perspective, the most important outcome of
the Cuban missile crisis was not a checklist of
guidelines for future crisis management but the
agreement to set up a ‘hot line’-a direct
communications link between Moscow and
Washington-that would maximize the chances of
negotiating a direct settlement between the principal
parties.
37
38. Types of Cold war Diplomacy
Summit diplomacy: refers to a direct meeting between heads of
government (of the superpowers in particular) to resolve major
problems. The ‘summit’ became a regular mode of contact during
the cold war
The summit meeting between the superpowers was pioneered by
the Geneva summit in 1955
Initially, summit meetings had symbolic value only but, by the 1970s,
they had become a useful forum of negotiating tangible agreements
which contributed to a reduction of East-West tensions
By the mid-1980s, a series of superpower summits played a
significant role in bringing the cold war to an end
38
39. Cold War Diplomacy: Other
Issues
Many of the characteristics of the new diplomacy
continued to evolve in the period after the Second
World War, indeed multilateralism and an increasingly
specialized agenda now contained issues like the
environment, technology, and arms control
In terms of changing structures and processes, a host
of new states joined an already complex array of state
and non-state actors as the former colonies of the
39
40. Diplomacy in the Post-Cold
War Era
The end of the cold war represented a dramatic
change in the international context within which
diplomacy is conducted
The end of the ideological East-West conflict and the
demise of the Soviet Union raised popular
expectations about what might now be achieved by
diplomacy and negotiation.
The successful ousting of the invading Iraqi forces
from Kuwait in 1991 by a US-Ied military coalition
sanctioned by a UN resolution appeared to provide a
model for the future.
40
41. Diplomacy in the Post-Cold
War Era
But optimism was soon replaced by a realization that
the end of the cold war may have resolved some
problems but other problems had merely been hidden
from view during the cold war period
The failure of diplomacy to resolve the breakdown of
order in the former Yugoslavia illustrates the
intractable nature of many post-cold war problems on
the international agenda.
41
42. Diplomacy in the Post-Cold
War Era
At the beginning of the twenty-first century, diplomacy at the level
of world politics could be characterized in two ways
First, diplomacy is now genuinely global in scope
Second, contemporary diplomacy can also be characterized as
complex and fragmented. In terms of the analytical categories used
here, there are multiple actors involved, complex multilateral as well
as bilateral processes at work, and the substance of global
diplomacy covers a wider agenda of issues than ever before
42
43. Diplomacy and the ‘war
against terrorism’
If the end of the cold war spawned an optimistic mood
about what might be achieved by diplomacy, the
sudden and devastating attack on the World Trade
Center in New York on 11 September 2001 produced
the very opposite mood of deep pessimism.
First: this time the international community is facing
challenge posed by a non-state actor
43
44. Diplomacy and the ‘war
against terrorism’
A second key reason for a sense of pessimism about
diplomacy was the decision of the George W. Bush
Administration to frame the response to 9/11 in terms
of a ‘war against terrorism’ which suggested that
military force and other coercive measures would be
the instruments of choice.
This created a rift in trans-Atlantic relations
44
45. Diplomacy and the ‘war
against terrorism’
From a European perspective, there were three
interrelated concerns that relate to diplomacy
First, unilateralism.
It was apparent that the US Government was
determined to invade Iraq, ostensibly in the cause of
counterterrorism, whether or not its allies were in
support and whether or not a legitimizing resolution
could be obtained at the United Nations
45
46. Diplomacy and the ‘war
against terrorism’
Second, there was concern about the new US military
doctrine of pre-emption which implied at least a
rejection of both containment and deterrence, the twin
pillars of US diplomacy in the cold war. The fear in
Europe was that the invasion of Iraq would be followed
by the use of military force against other ‘rogue’ states.
46
47. Diplomacy and the ‘war
against terrorism’
The third related concern refers more broadly to the relationship
between what are called ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ instruments of power
As defined by Christopher HilI, ‘hard’ power refers to ‘that which is
targeted, coercive, often immediate and physical’, whereas ‘soft’
power refers to ‘that which is indirect, long term and works more
through persuasion than force’
Disarray in Iraq questioned the efficacy of military force and strong
arguments were being made in favor of a soft power approach to
the global problem of terror.
47
48. Conclusion
Diplomacy is neither a vague concept nor an international activity
that is of interest only to diplomatic historians
As an international process and a policy instrument, diplomacy
preceded the modern states system.
It then played a central role in the operation of that system for
hundreds of years
Today, adapted to the demands of the contemporary global system,
diplomacy continues to make an important contribution to
cooperation and order in that system
But also: it cannot guarantee peace for which will of all the parties is
needed
48