I decided to present a print version of my double page spread to my peers and ask for their opinions on it. They highlighted a few strengths and a few weaknesses which will help me to improve my final product .

1. DOUBLE PAGE SPREAD
DEVELOPMENT
Peer analysis

2. PEER FEEDBACK

3. PEER FEEDBACK-
POSITIVES
 “The larger image on the left is engaging and gives the reader and
idea of what the article is about”.
 “The layout of the text and the amount of text is proportionate to
the images which gives the page a balanced appearance.”
 “Having a strip of images down the right hand side works well as a
reminder that although the article is mainly about the artist on the left,
the reason behind it also features the second artist.”

4. PEER FEEDBACK
IMPROVEMENTS
 “some of the edges of images are jagged from editing, these could be softened
and made to look more professional”.
 “The text could be warped around the models arm, in places where it is harder
to read because of the background colour.”
 “Maybe adding a pull quote into the centre of your two main columns of text,
would engage the reader into a main focus of the information/interview.”
 “The image strip down the right hand side of the page should be brought more
into the page to avoid any missing parts of the images.”