Downloaded 329 times
Uploaded byMyra Delos Reyes
descriptive method
The document describes different types of research methods, including survey, normative, correlational, evaluative, assessment, comparative, continuity, trend, narrative, ex-post facto, and case study methods. For each method, it provides a brief definition and description. It also discusses advantages and limitations of some methods, such as comparative studies and ex-post facto research.
More Related Content
Similar to descriptive method
descriptive method
- 1. MYRA L. DELOSREYES
- 2. SURVEY It uses questionnaireor other instruments to generate data prepared by the researchers. NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY Descriptive Survey Method ADVANTAGES
- 3. It deals withstandardized instruments like mental ability test, stress and personality questionnaire, morale and job satisfaction questionnaire. Descriptive Normative Method SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY
- 4. It is usedto determine whether or not there is a relationship that exists between two or more quantifiable variables, if there is, to what extent or degree the relationship is. Descriptive Correlational Method SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY
- 5. This study judgesthe goodness of an existing program. If it is directed to whether or not a particular program achieved its goals or not. Descriptive Evaluative Method Click here!! SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY
- 6. 4. Are thereother unintended results of the program? If there is, were they positive or negative? According to Best and Khan, DEM answer the following questions: SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY Return 2. What are the intended results of the program? 1. What are the goals and objectives of the program being evaluated? 3. Are the intended results of the program achieved? 5. Are the results of the program sufficient to warrant continuation?
- 7. This is afact-finding activity that describes conditions that exist at a particular time such as practices and beliefs. Descriptive Assessment Method SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY
- 8. This method providesan explanation about the extent of relationship between two or more variables. Descriptive Comparative Method SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY ADVANTAGES DISADVANTAGES
- 9. • Intervening variablecan easily be noted Advantages of Comparative Study SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY • Research variable can easily be selected • The result can be known immediately • It is easily conducted Return
- 10. • The findingsare limited Disadvantages of Comparative Study Return SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY • Variables to be selected are limited • It is difficult to get samples which have the same characteristics or attributes.
- 11. The researcher isknowledgeable about the operation of natural or social forces which may be obtained by watching them analytically at stated intervals in their development over a long period of time as seen desirable and possible. Descriptive Continuity Method SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY
- 12. Based upon alongitudinal consideration of recorded data, indicating what has been happening in the past, what the present situation reveals, and on the basis of these data it projects what is likely to happen in the future. Descriptive Trend Method SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY
- 13. This method tellsus about the results of the study. Descriptive Narrative Method SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY
- 14. Also known ascausal-comparative research or after-the-fact research. Descriptive Ex-Post Facto Method SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY Limitations of Ex-Post Facto Research
- 15. It is anintensive and descriptive analysis of a single subject. It examines a social unit as a whole, and the unit may be a single typical individual, a family, a social group, a social institution, or a community. Descriptive Case Study Method SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY Click Here
- 16. SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY Advantagesof the Descriptive Survey Method • Typical, average or normal. • The result of the survey may be used for prediction. • It makes possible the formulation of generalization. • It reveals problem for which timely remedial measures may be instituted. Return
- 17.
- 18. SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY Limitationsof Ex-Post Facto Research • The information used in this study may not be complete. • Causes are often multiple rather than single. • Lack of knowledge on the part of the researcher regarding what variable were controlled makes this type of research very difficult to do. Click Here
- 19. SURVEY NORMATIVE CORRELATIONAL EVALUATIVE ASSESSMENT COMPARATIVE CONTINUITY TREND NARRATIVE EX-POST FACTO CASE STUDY Limitationsof Ex-Post Facto Research • Independent variables cannot be manipulated. • Subjects cannot be randomly assigned to treatment group. Return
- 20.
- 21.