The document discusses deglobalization as the diminishing interdependence and integration between nations, highlighting its historical context and recent trends such as trade decline and increased protectionism. It analyzes the risks associated with deglobalization, including slower growth and heightened international conflict, while offering potential solutions like local economic protection and equitable resource distribution. The author questions the efficacy of current global trade systems and advocates for a reorientation of economic priorities towards social equity and environmental sustainability.

1. Deglobalisation and Its Impacts
Prabhu Guptara
prabhusguptara@gmail.com

2. Globalization
• Increasing world integration of capital, production and
markets, driven by the logic of corporate profitability
•Profit above equity, justice, environment,
community and nation?

3. Deglobalisation: “globalization retreating”
The process of diminishing interdependence and integration
between nations: Trade declines, governments create tariffs
and other protectionist measures, investment lessens,
cultural & personal links between countries shrink or are
even attacked.
Though it seems difficult to believe, there have been long
periods of history when trade and investment between
countries did decline – e.g. 1914-1950s
In contrast to the periods 1850–1914 and 1950s–2007, when
it was globalization that increased.

4. Why deglobalization?
•Weakness of international governance structures?
• A general trend of reducing trust between people,
between people and leaders, and between people and
institutions?
• The impact of the crisis?
• Increasing environmental threats, & economic and social
inequalities?

5. Measuring Globalisation/ Deglobalisation
The four main economic flows:
• Goods and services, e.g. exports plus imports as a proportion of
national income, or per head of population.
• Labour/people, e.g., net migration rates; inward or outward migration
flows, weighted by population (and resultant remittances in per cent
of GDP)
• Capital, e.g. inward or outward direct investment as a proportion of
national income or per head of population
• Technology.

6. Other measures of (de) globalization:
•Average tariffs
•Border restrictions on labour
•Restrictions on foreign direct investment, and/or
•Restrictions on outward direct investment.

7. Deglobalisation starts:
• United States of America, where the Bush and Obama
administration instituted the Buy American Provision*
of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of
2009 as part of a massive stimulus package, which
was designed to favour American-made goods over
traded goods (*any public building or public works
project funded by the new stimulus package would
use only iron, steel and other manufactured goods
produced in the United States)
• But don’t blame the USA alone!

8. Deglobalisation (continued)
• The EU provided new subsidies to protect its own agricultural sectors
• Most governments paid lip service to a globally coordinated response for
addressing the current economic crisis, but each of them put in place
separate stimulus programs for their own national markets
• Export-oriented growth stalled – and that had been the driver of economic
growth for many economies
• The Doha Round of trade negotiations under the World Trade Organization
was completed under the usual slogan of advancing trade liberalization as a
means of countering the global downturn
• But will we really return to a world dependent on free-spending American
consumers, when so many there are bankrupt, unemployed & on low
wages?

9. Status today:
Policymakers generally continue to:
- emphasise free trade,
- give primacy to private enterprise,
and
- think of a minimal role for the state.

10. What about the critics of market fundamentalism?
Establishment critics, such as Joseph Stiglitz and Paul Krugman, are involved
in endless debates over merely:
- how large stimulus programs should be,
- whether or not the state should be interventionist,
- whether, once companies and banks have been “stabilized”, they
should be returned to the private sector.
Others, such as Stiglitz, continue to promote the economic benefits of
globalization, considering the “collateral damage to society” as merely sad
but incidental and inevitable.

11. Risks of deglobalization:
•Slower long-term growth
•Greater gap between poorer and richer countries
•More protectionism/ less cooperation, and
•Increased risk of international conflict.

12. Bretton Woods vs Today
• The benefits of the Bretton Woods institutions were meant to extend
beyond prevention of Great Depressions, to preventing Great Wars!
• De-globalisation influences Foreign Direct Investment, lending,
development aid, migration, etc., also threatens the institutions that
underpin the liberal peace
• We need strict adherence to procedures, in WTO and other multilateral
organisations, that aim at increasing global stability, by punishing those who
violate the principles on which freedoms are based (but China?)
• Free trade, for example, cannot be an end in itself - it can only be justified if
it is a means to a more human life for most of the world.

13. So, in the present crisis, does the world trade
system offer adequate protection to small and
medium-sized countries?
• Is it a first line of defence against increasing bilateralism, protectionism
and power politics?
• Does it provide a good institutional and economic background against
which trade and investment can grow, and conflicts be resolved?

14. Deglobalization: The double whammy of the
current oil price shock
• Benefitting net importers of energy, but also,
• Harming exporters, especially those overly reliant on hydrocarbons.
• Will the geopolitical impact be a diminution of US interest in the
Middle East?
• Will that lead to China and India, among other energy importers,
being tempted to take a more proactive role in Asia?
• What if China, for example, begins to throw its weight beyond its
“backyard” (and what is that?)

15. Has globalization been discredited by the
current global downturn?
•The worst economic situation since the Great
Depression 70 years ago.
•Global poverty and inequality increasing, while
most poor countries experience little or no
economic growth
•Deglobalization has become “the transmission
belt (not of prosperity but instead) of economic
crisis and collapse”

16. What can be done
• Use trade quotas and tariffs to protect local economies from destruction
by corporate commodities subsidized by artificially low taxes, prices, and
currencies
• Substitute reliance on exports, by reliance on vibrant communities/
national markets, through equitable income and land redistribution
which produces local financial resources for investment
• Use subsidies, tariffs, and trade to influence whether and when to
introduce robots and other advanced manufacturing/ industrial
technologies
• De-emphasise growth, emphasize improvement in the quality of life
• Encourage development and diffusion of environmentally-friendly
technology.

17. What can be done (Continued)
• Increase the scope of democratic (as against government or
technocratic) decision-making to cover all vital questions – e.g. which
industries to develop/ phase out, what proportion of the government
budget to devote to which sector….
• Institutionalize the monitoring and supervision of the private sector
and the state by civil society
• Enable the development of a mixed economy, excluding transnational
corporations, but including community cooperatives, private
enterprises, and state enterprises
• Replace centralized global institutions like the IMF and the World Bank
which emphasize free trade and capital mobility, with regional financial
institutions built on principles of cooperation.

18. Why move beyond narrow economic efficiency?
• Why should the key criterion be the reduction of unit cost? What
about the cost of the resulting social and ecological destabilization?
• Why should we have a system that produces a nightmare even for
accountants?
• Why should economics not strengthen social solidarity by
subordinating the operations of the market to the values of equity,
justice, and community?
• Instead of having society driven by the economy, could de-globalization
re-embed the economy in society?

19. Concluding questions
• Are "one size fits all" models, like neoliberalism or centralized
bureaucratic socialism, always dysfunctional and destabilizing?
• Should we rather expect and encourage redundancy and diversity in
economics, as there is in nature?

20. Deglobalisation
Prabhu Guptara
prabhusguptara@gmail.com