Decision-Making Process Evaluation and Infographic Grading Guide PHL/320 Version 6 2 Decision-Making Process Evaluation and Infographic Grading Guide PHL/320 Version 6 Critical Thinking and Decision Making in Business Copyright Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2013, 2012 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries. Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or other countries. All other company and product names are trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective companies. Use of these marks is not intended to imply endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation. Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial standards and practices. Individual Assignment: Decision-Making Process Evaluation and InfographicPurpose of Assignment The assignment for Week 4 gives students a chance to examine their own decision-making process as well as use a creative method to illustrate the stages of the process. This gives students the opportunity to take their real world, personal decision and relate it to their future work and careers. Grading Guide Content Met Partially Met Not Met Comments: The student discussed the influence the decision-making process had on the outcome. The student evaluated the effectiveness of the decision-making process and discussed the stages they found most challenging and the reasons why. The paper is 700 words in length. The student created a “Decision-making Process” infographic in an appropriate format for the organization based on the action plan. This can be done using Microsoft® PowerPoint®, Microsoft® Publisher®, Word, or sites such as Glogster® and PiktoChart® The student identified the stages of the decision-making process as it related to their decision. Total Available Total Earned 7 #/7 Writing Guidelines Met Partially Met Not Met Comments: The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page, and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting guidelines and meets course-level requirements. Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a reference page. Paragraph and sentence transitions are present, logical, and maintain the flow throughout the paper. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise. Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and punctuation. Total Available Total Earned 3 #/3 Assignment Total # 10 #/10 Additional comments: Decision-Making Process Evaluation and Infographic Grading Guide PHL/320 Version 6 2 Decision-Making Process Evaluation and Infographic Grading Guide PHL/320 Version 6 Critical Thinking and Decision Making in Business Copyright Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2013, 2012 by University of Phoenix. All rights reserved. University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo Group, Inc. in the U.

1. Decision-Making Process Evaluation and Infographic Grading
Guide
PHL/320 Version 6
2
Decision-Making Process Evaluation and Infographic Grading
Guide
PHL/320 Version 6
Critical Thinking and Decision Making in Business
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2013, 2012 by University of Phoenix.
All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo
Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered
trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or
other countries. All other company and product names are
trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective
companies. Use of these marks is not intended to imply
endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial
standards and practices.
Individual Assignment: Decision-Making Process Evaluation
and InfographicPurpose of Assignment
The assignment for Week 4 gives students a chance to examine
their own decision-making process as well as use a creative

2. method to illustrate the stages of the process. This gives
students the opportunity to take their real world, personal
decision and relate it to their future work and careers.
Grading Guide
Content
Met
Partially Met
Not Met
Comments:
The student discussed the influence the decision-making process
had on the outcome.
The student evaluated the effectiveness of the decision-making
process and discussed the stages they found most challenging
and the reasons why.
The paper is 700 words in length.
The student created a “Decision-making Process” infographic in
an appropriate format for the organization based on the action
plan. This can be done using Microsoft® PowerPoint®,
Microsoft® Publisher®, Word, or sites such as Glogster® and
PiktoChart®

3. The student identified the stages of the decision-making process
as it related to their decision.
Total Available
Total Earned
7
#/7
Writing Guidelines
Met
Partially Met
Not Met
Comments:
The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page,
and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting
guidelines and meets course-level requirements.
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a
reference page.
Paragraph and sentence transitions are present, logical, and
maintain the flow throughout the paper.

4. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.
Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and
punctuation.
Total Available
Total Earned
3
#/3
Assignment Total
#
10
#/10
Additional comments:
Decision-Making Process Evaluation and Infographic Grading

5. Guide
PHL/320 Version 6
2
Decision-Making Process Evaluation and Infographic Grading
Guide
PHL/320 Version 6
Critical Thinking and Decision Making in Business
Copyright
Copyright © 2016, 2015, 2013, 2012 by University of Phoenix.
All rights reserved.
University of Phoenix® is a registered trademark of Apollo
Group, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
Microsoft®, Windows®, and Windows NT® are registered
trademarks of Microsoft Corporation in the United States and/or
other countries. All other company and product names are
trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective
companies. Use of these marks is not intended to imply
endorsement, sponsorship, or affiliation.
Edited in accordance with University of Phoenix® editorial
standards and practices.
Individual Assignment: Decision-Making Process Evaluation
and InfographicPurpose of Assignment
The assignment for Week 4 gives students a chance to examine
their own decision-making process as well as use a creative
method to illustrate the stages of the process. This gives
students the opportunity to take their real world, personal
decision and relate it to their future work and careers.
Grading Guide

6. Content
Met
Partially Met
Not Met
Comments:
The student discussed the influence the decision-making process
had on the outcome.
The student evaluated the effectiveness of the decision-making
process and discussed the stages they found most challenging
and the reasons why.
The paper is 700 words in length.
The student created a “Decision-making Process” infographic in
an appropriate format for the organization based on the action
plan. This can be done using Microsoft® PowerPoint®,
Microsoft® Publisher®, Word, or sites such as Glogster® and
PiktoChart®
The student identified the stages of the decision-making process
as it related to their decision.

7. Total Available
Total Earned
7
#/7
Writing Guidelines
Met
Partially Met
Not Met
Comments:
The paper—including tables and graphs, headings, title page,
and reference page—is consistent with APA formatting
guidelines and meets course-level requirements.
Intellectual property is recognized with in-text citations and a
reference page.
Paragraph and sentence transitions are present, logical, and
maintain the flow throughout the paper.

8. Sentences are complete, clear, and concise.
Rules of grammar and usage are followed including spelling and
punctuation.
Total Available
Total Earned
3
#/3
Assignment Total
#
10
#/10
Additional comments: