Animal research has contributed significantly to public health throughout history. Key developments include vaccines for polio and other diseases, antibiotics, and Louis Pasteur's rabies vaccine. Animal models are important because many animals, like mice and pigs, share anatomical and genetic similarities with humans, making them suitable for studying human diseases. New medical advancements continue to emerge from animal research, such as robotic surgery techniques developed using pig models. Overall, responsible animal research has improved human and animal health and led to many life-saving advances.
Biotechnology in Food and Agriculture; the Biosafety Issues [Tarek Alfalah, U...UNESCO Venice Office
Workshop on Higher Education and Professional Responsibility in CBRN Applied Sciences and Technology across the Sub-Mediterranean Region
3-4 April 2012. Palazzo Zorzi, Venice
Session 4. Future Directions - Higher Education and Responsible Science
One World - One Health presentation Katinka de Balogh FAOHarm Kiezebrink
During the FVE conference in Brussels on April 7, 2014, Katinka de Balogh, leader the global Veterinary Public Health activities of the FAO, presented the One-Health approach to highlight the importance of prevention, ensuring health and welfare of people and animals in a globalized environment:
• The benefit coming from the implementation of good health management in practice, both in terms of health and welfare, as well as, of financial sustainability
• The importance of coordinating actions in both sectors via a One-Health approach, with a particular focus on zoonotic diseases
• The role of the medical and veterinary profession in assuring these matters and educating the society
Katinka de Balogh is of Dutch and Hungarian origins and grew up in Latin-America. She studied veterinary medicine in Berlin and Munich and graduated and obtained her doctorate in tropical parasitology from the Tropical Institute of the University of Munich in 1984. In the late 80’s she had spent two years as a young professional at the Veterinary Public Health Unit of the World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva. In 2002 she started working at the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) in Rome.
Antimalarial metabolization: what have we learnt so far?Premier Publishers
Considering malaria is a highly devastating disease of mankind, total eradication of malaria seems to be an uphill task, the only relief from this disease is achieved by usage of antimalarial drugs. Since malaria is associated with humans from time immemorial, usage of traditional substances to most presently effective antimalarial have been recorded to cure this disease. With the advent of modern biological techniques aided the understanding of the biochemical pathways of antimalarial metabolism thereby helping in designing successful usage of many antimalarials. Nevertheless, improper usages of certain drugs have led to the origin and spread of drug resistant malaria parasites (chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum). Also, the genetic basis of antimalarial metabolism in humans is now well understood and frequent mutations in genes of malarial parasites are well associated with drug resistance. The entire scenario of antimalarial usage in the field have become complicated, partly due to poor understanding between antimalarial metabolism in humans and drug fighting mechanism in parasites, by which resistance to even combined therapy (e.g. Artemisinin Combination Therapy) have started emerging. Vital basic understanding from human and parasite population genetics (involving antimalarial both metabolizing genes in human and resistant genes in parasite) could be an ideal starting point to malaria control.
Wagner College Forum for Undergraduate Research, Vol. 18 No. 2Wagner College
The Spring 2020 issue contains papers by: Alexandra Ruth Elder; Graham Schmelzer; Maria D’Amico, Nicole Doherty and Iman Eulinberg; Gina LaRosa; Jeanine Woody; and Paige Tolbard.
Biotechnology in Food and Agriculture; the Biosafety Issues [Tarek Alfalah, U...UNESCO Venice Office
Workshop on Higher Education and Professional Responsibility in CBRN Applied Sciences and Technology across the Sub-Mediterranean Region
3-4 April 2012. Palazzo Zorzi, Venice
Session 4. Future Directions - Higher Education and Responsible Science
One World - One Health presentation Katinka de Balogh FAOHarm Kiezebrink
During the FVE conference in Brussels on April 7, 2014, Katinka de Balogh, leader the global Veterinary Public Health activities of the FAO, presented the One-Health approach to highlight the importance of prevention, ensuring health and welfare of people and animals in a globalized environment:
• The benefit coming from the implementation of good health management in practice, both in terms of health and welfare, as well as, of financial sustainability
• The importance of coordinating actions in both sectors via a One-Health approach, with a particular focus on zoonotic diseases
• The role of the medical and veterinary profession in assuring these matters and educating the society
Katinka de Balogh is of Dutch and Hungarian origins and grew up in Latin-America. She studied veterinary medicine in Berlin and Munich and graduated and obtained her doctorate in tropical parasitology from the Tropical Institute of the University of Munich in 1984. In the late 80’s she had spent two years as a young professional at the Veterinary Public Health Unit of the World Health Organization (WHO) in Geneva. In 2002 she started working at the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) in Rome.
Antimalarial metabolization: what have we learnt so far?Premier Publishers
Considering malaria is a highly devastating disease of mankind, total eradication of malaria seems to be an uphill task, the only relief from this disease is achieved by usage of antimalarial drugs. Since malaria is associated with humans from time immemorial, usage of traditional substances to most presently effective antimalarial have been recorded to cure this disease. With the advent of modern biological techniques aided the understanding of the biochemical pathways of antimalarial metabolism thereby helping in designing successful usage of many antimalarials. Nevertheless, improper usages of certain drugs have led to the origin and spread of drug resistant malaria parasites (chloroquine resistant Plasmodium falciparum). Also, the genetic basis of antimalarial metabolism in humans is now well understood and frequent mutations in genes of malarial parasites are well associated with drug resistance. The entire scenario of antimalarial usage in the field have become complicated, partly due to poor understanding between antimalarial metabolism in humans and drug fighting mechanism in parasites, by which resistance to even combined therapy (e.g. Artemisinin Combination Therapy) have started emerging. Vital basic understanding from human and parasite population genetics (involving antimalarial both metabolizing genes in human and resistant genes in parasite) could be an ideal starting point to malaria control.
Wagner College Forum for Undergraduate Research, Vol. 18 No. 2Wagner College
The Spring 2020 issue contains papers by: Alexandra Ruth Elder; Graham Schmelzer; Maria D’Amico, Nicole Doherty and Iman Eulinberg; Gina LaRosa; Jeanine Woody; and Paige Tolbard.
Research Methods: Ethics II (Animal Research)Brian Piper
lecture 3 from a college level research methods in psychology course taught in the spring 2012 semester by Brian J. Piper, Ph.D. (psy391@gmail.com) at Linfield College, includes IACUC, animal welfare act, refinement, reduction, replacement
Justifications for invasive experiments on animals rely on claims that such research is essential for the advancement of biomedical knowledge, for the development of cures to human diseases, or for the evaluation of the toxicity of compounds to which humans are exposed. Until recently, critical evaluations of the accuracy of such claims have been rare. However, a growing body of large-scale systematic reviews have now been published in scientific and medical journals. The outcomes have been consistent: animal experiments have contributed far less than advocates would have us believe.
This presentation summarises these recent results, and comprehensively reviews the alternatives to invasive animal use with biomedical research, toxicity testing, and education.
Published studies are available at www.AnimalExperiments.info.
Today there exists a wide spectrum of views on this subject, ranging from those concerned with animal 'rights' to those who view animals only as a resource to be exploited.
All of thThe five freedoms were originally developed from a UK Government report on livestock husbandry in 1965 (Prof.Roger Brambell) then by Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC) In July 1979
Freedom from hunger or thirst by ready access to fresh water and a diet to maintain full health and vigour .
Freedom from discomfort by providing an appropriate environment including shelter and a comfortable resting area .
Freedom from pain, injury or disease by prevention or rapid diagnosis and treatment.
Freedom to express (most) normal behaviour by providing sufficient space, proper facilities and company of the animal's own kind.
Freedom from fear and distress by ensuring conditions and treatment which avoid mental suffering.
The Use of Animals in ResearchStudent NameAffi.docxssusera34210
The Use of Animals in Research
Student Name
Affiliate Institution
The Use of Animals in Research
The debate about experimental animal use in research aim to prove weather their usage is a pseudoscience or not. Animals have been used widely in scientific research since the 500 BC. However, the use of experimental animals for research has been a controversial issue and subject of ethical debates. The growing body of animal advocates believes that experimental animal use in research is not necessary for reasons of wasting resources. Industries such as pharmaceutical research companies and cosmetics manufacturers use animals such as rats, rabbits and pigs to test their products. With such usage, the society has persistently called upon the concerned scientific community to find an alternative of experimental animal use especially in the business industries. Despite the fact that animal advocates who stage campaigns against the use of animals in research consider it unethical, pure research scientists have not demonstrated the economic and academic benefits of using these animals where Pound et al., (2004) argue that there is no evidence to show that the use of animals in research has direct human benefits. The animal use has led to a better scientific understanding of disease and drug processes hence leading to proper formulations and medical breakthroughs. Experimental animals have been successful models of disease and drug studies before clinical trials. The use of experimental animals is the basic science established in the research of cognitive science, biology, and medicine.
Organizations that refute the use of animals for research such as PETA and ASPCA consider these traditional scientific activities out of date and that it is morally wrong to use animals solely for the benefit of human beings. These organizations claim that traditional animal experiments are costly, they are expensive and time-consuming, (Ryder, 2005). In addition, animal advocates argue that pure research scientists have not been accountable for those experiments that have failed and their results having no economic or academic benefits in the society. Even worse, there is evidence indicating that experimental animal results can mislead researchers. Animals may die in the process of experimentation due to toxic drug treatment and such results may confuse. The PETA organization indicate that researchers focus on making the animals sick and later cure them, a process that does not happen in human. The PETA and allied organization also argue that best doctors and scientists are misplaced because they are compensated to work with animals in the laboratory instead of working with real patients in the community. Even though using animals in research is undisputedly intellectually seductive, these experiments have not solved the urgent health problems of this era such as heart disease, cancer, stroke, AIDS and birth defects. However, scientists have a good course ...
Running head ANIMAL RIGHTS LITERATURE REVIEWANIMAL RIGHTS LITER.docxSUBHI7
Running head: ANIMAL RIGHTS LITERATURE REVIEW
ANIMAL RIGHTS LITERATURE REVIEW 2
Introduction
Animal rights movement advocates for animal’s wellbeing, free from pain, cruelty and abuse as they are living beings and they have the right to live in liberty. Abuse of animals has become a major issue worldwide therefore becoming a problem that can be solved only through obtaining a clear comprehension of what the rights entail. Animal rights as a movement challenges the society’s old view that all animals only exist for human use like in experimentation and agriculture (Sunstein 388). Despite the comprehension of what animal rights entail, it is crucial for individuals to understand the potential causes of animal abuse. While those who display these practices of viciousness and disregard towards animals must be dissected and, if vital, liberatingly analyzed, they should likewise be considered responsible for their activities, which is done by specific laws and controls that endeavor to forestall animal cruelty. This way, the harmful effects of animal abuse is lessened and stopped.
Many individuals trust that animals do not have rights, and that the general populations who support animal rights are liberals who need to discover different channels for their persuasions while others feel it is our ethical commitment to nurture animals as they cannot act or talk for themselves. Protecting animals is, imperative for some reasons, including the help they provide for plant ecosystems, the emotional and psychological bolster they can offer to people, and the knowledge picked up from the sociological studies of them and therefore they have the right to experience their lives free from exploitation and misery. We as human beings however do take speciesism to extremes, making new species through farming and domestication, invading most climates and environments, and utilizing our intelligence to expand or sort term gains at the detriment of long-term sustainability. Animals have rights to live free of pain, abuse and suffering.
Literature Review
The fight against animal brutality, the advocacy of animal rights and the welfare of animals has occurred to some degree over the span of history. It's vital to comprehend that owning animals as property to be eaten or killed is the defining core of our consciousness, and that every human being is routinely indoctrinated into the attitude of control, reductionism, avoidance, elitism, and disconnectedness required by the sustenance practices of our culture (Cochrane 37). This review discusses the existing literature in regard to animal rights. The section contains history, terminology and the pros and cons of the controversies involved in animal rights.
All around the world the “animal research controversy” is capturing community attention by storm. Many are the individuals who emphasize on different con ...
1 This sample paper was adapted by the WriVannaJoy20
1
*This sample paper was adapted by the Writing Center from an original paper by a
student. Used by permission.
Updated March 2021
2
The introduction should introduce your topic and share the societal problem that you see. At the end of the
introduction, you should state your thesis, which should include your proposed solution to the problem. You may
also state the positive ethical effects of your proposed solution.
To Test or Not to Test: Ethics in Animal Testing
The subject of animal testing raises questions of necessity. Animal testing is
something that has been done for many years for several different reasons. It has been
used since the dawn of medicine by physicians and scientists. From biomedical research
to testing cosmetics, people claim that animal testing is necessary to benefit people in sa-
tiating their need for certain products as well as saving lives. There is an idea that animals
are the best way to find treatments and cures for people, but the treatment of animals is of
concern for some members of society. Society is feeling more and more that animals
have as much right to live freely in this world as humans do, and our obligation to see to
this makes animal testing a societal problem. Due to these concerns and others, there
have been several laws and acts formed to protect animals and minimize their suffering.
And with the advances of technology and other discoveries, the question of the necessity
of animal testing is becoming an issue for animal activist s and lovers everywhere. { The
future of medicine and biomedical research should not rely on animals for testing. In-
stead, we should use alternative testing methods and work toward making different life-
style choices. These solutions create the ethical outcome of ending the suffering of these
animals, which will have a positive influence on society and culture}.
Here, the
student is
introducing the
topic of animal
testing to the
reader.
The introduction
includes a very
brief discussion
of why this is a
societal problem.
The introduction
ends with a
thesis statement
that includes the
student’s
proposed
solution(s) to
the societal
problem. She
also has
included the
positive ethical
outcome of the
solution(s).
Use section headers for
each of the major
sections of your paper.
Problem
This first body section of your paper
should provide some background
information on your topic and discuss why
this is a societal problem.
Background Animal testing has been deemed necessary for many reasons. Animal testing has
been done to determine the safety of household cleaning products, cosmetics including
3
Reason #1
animal
skin care, shampoo and makeup, as well as biomedical research that provides medicine
and treatments for humans and pets alike. The BioIndustry Association (2002) argues that
“Animal research ha ...
Running head ANIMAL TESTING 1 To Test or.docxSUBHI7
Running head: ANIMAL TESTING 1
To Test or Not to Test: Ethics in Animal Testing
Student Name
GEN 499 General Education Capstone
Professor Millie Jones
November 16, 2050*
*This sample paper was adapted by the Writing Center from an original paper by a stu-
dent. Used by permission.
ANIMAL TESTING 2
To Test or Not to Test: Ethics in Animal Testing
The subject of animal testing raises questions of necessity. Animal testing is
something that has been done for many years for several different reasons. It has been
used since the dawn of medicine by physicians and scientists. From biomedical research
to testing cosmetics, people claim that animal testing is necessary to benefit people in sa-
tiating their need for certain products as well as saving lives. There is an idea that animals
are the best way to find treatments and cures for people, but the treatment of animals is of
concern for some members of society. Society is feeling more and more that animals
have as much right to live freely in this world as humans do, and our obligation to see to
this makes animal testing a societal problem. Due to these concerns and others, there
have been several laws and acts formed to protect animals and minimize their suffering.
And with the advances of technology and other discoveries, the question of the necessity
of animal testing is becoming an issue for animal activists and lovers everywhere. The
future of medicine and biomedical research should not rely on animals for testing. In-
stead, we should use alternative testing methods and work toward making different life-
style choices. These solutions create the ethical outcome of ending the suffering of these
animals, which will have a positive influence on society and culture.
Problem
Animal testing has been deemed necessary for many reasons. Animal testing has
been done to determine the safety of household cleaning products, cosmetics including
The introduction should introduce your topic and share the societal problem that you see. At the end of the introduction, you
should state your thesis, which should include your proposed solution to the problem. You may also state the positive ethical
effects of your proposed solution.
The introduction
ends with a the-
sis statement
that includes the
student’s pro-
posed solu-
tion(s) to the
societal prob-
lem. She also
has included the
positive ethical
outcome of the
solution(s).
The introduction
includes a very
brief discussion
of why this is a
societal problem.
{
}
Use section headers for
each of the major
sections of your paper.
Background
Here, the
student is
introducing the
topic of animal
testing to the
reader.
This first body section of your paper
should provide some background
information on your topic and discuss why
this is a societal problem.
ANIMAL TESTING 3
skin care, shampoo an ...
Running head ANIMAL TESTING 1 To Test or.docxtoddr4
Running head: ANIMAL TESTING 1
To Test or Not to Test: Ethics in Animal Testing
Student Name
GEN 499 General Education Capstone
Professor Millie Jones
November 16, 2050*
*This sample paper was adapted by the Writing Center from an original paper by a stu-
dent. Used by permission.
ANIMAL TESTING 2
To Test or Not to Test: Ethics in Animal Testing
The subject of animal testing raises questions of necessity. Animal testing is
something that has been done for many years for several different reasons. It has been
used since the dawn of medicine by physicians and scientists. From biomedical research
to testing cosmetics, people claim that animal testing is necessary to benefit people in sa-
tiating their need for certain products as well as saving lives. There is an idea that animals
are the best way to find treatments and cures for people, but the treatment of animals is of
concern for some members of society. Society is feeling more and more that animals
have as much right to live freely in this world as humans do, and our obligation to see to
this makes animal testing a societal problem. Due to these concerns and others, there
have been several laws and acts formed to protect animals and minimize their suffering.
And with the advances of technology and other discoveries, the question of the necessity
of animal testing is becoming an issue for animal activists and lovers everywhere. The
future of medicine and biomedical research should not rely on animals for testing. In-
stead, we should use alternative testing methods and work toward making different life-
style choices. These solutions create the ethical outcome of ending the suffering of these
animals, which will have a positive influence on society and culture.
Problem
Animal testing has been deemed necessary for many reasons. Animal testing has
been done to determine the safety of household cleaning products, cosmetics including
The introduction should introduce your topic and share the societal problem that you see. At the end of the introduction, you
should state your thesis, which should include your proposed solution to the problem. You may also state the positive ethical
effects of your proposed solution.
The introduction
ends with a the-
sis statement
that includes the
student’s pro-
posed solu-
tion(s) to the
societal prob-
lem. She also
has included the
positive ethical
outcome of the
solution(s).
The introduction
includes a very
brief discussion
of why this is a
societal problem.
{
}
Use section headers for
each of the major
sections of your paper.
Background
Here, the
student is
introducing the
topic of animal
testing to the
reader.
This first body section of your paper
should provide some background
information on your topic and discuss why
this is a societal problem.
ANIMAL TESTING 3
skin care, shampoo an.
Contributions of Animal Research to Public Health FINAL
1. 2015
Eva Quintero
IDS 4934-001 (25590)
April 8, 2015
Contributions of Animal Research
to Public Health:
A Look in the Past and into the Future
2. Introduction
For centuries animals have been used for biological research and expanded our
knowledge of medicine and public health. This paper will focus on the history, ethics, and
scientific developments associated with animal research specifically in relation to the public
health system. This paper will also contain information regarding new technological
advancements and improvements in the field of animal research.
There are many ethical and real world issues associated with animal experimentation.
However, even with today’s advances in technology, animals continue to be used for the
development of new life-saving drugs and medical procedures. Animals share many
physiological and genetic similarities with humans, making them ideal models for biological
studies. Throughout history, animal research has contributed to the maintenance and promotion
of public health. Therefore, the use of animals in a responsible and ethical manner for
biomedical research is needed in order to make further advances in human health. Animal
testing is a necessary means for advances in scientific knowledge particularly regarding the
surveillance and prevention of disease in public health.
History of Animal Research
I. Animal research is hardly a new concept and has a surprisingly long history. Aristotle is
believed to be one of the first known to have performed experiments on living animals (Hajar,
2011). Likewise, a Roman physician named Galen dissected goats and pigs to learn of their
anatomy and physiology, a practice which later earned him the title “the father of vivisection”
(Lloyd, 2008). The first observations of great importance to modern science were made in the
1600s, when William Harvey used animals to describe the blood circulatory system (Lloyd
3. 2008). These are only a few examples of how animals have allowed us to better understand the
mechanisms of the human body.
Ethics
II. Despite this, there is an ongoing debate about the ethics of animal experimentation. Many
people feel that it is wrong or selfish to treat animals as tools in order to gain scientific
knowledge. On the contrary, others believe that the benefits that arise out of experimentation
outweigh any harm done to the animal. There are some who consider health as an “asset shared
by all species, animal and human, that would be guaranteed by a single medicine guided by
biomedical research” (DuCrot, 2011). In other words, both animals and humans share the overall
benefits that arise from animal experimentation.
Throughout its history, the practice of using animals for biomedical research has come
under severe criticism by society and more recently by animal rights groups and animal activists.
Those who oppose animal research would agree that animals have a moral status equal to that of
humans and therefore feel that it is wrong to needlessly hurt other animals. In the 17th century,
English philosopher John Locke fully recognized that animals were capable of feeling pain and
certain emotions and stated that “children should be brought up to abhor the killing or torturing
of any living thing in order to prevent them from later becoming capable of cruel actions to
fellow humans” (Franco, 2013).
There are many modern day organizations that strongly oppose the animal research
including People for the Ethical Treatment of Animal (PETA) and the Animal Liberation Front
(ALF). These organizations focus their attentions on protecting animals from cruelty and abuse,
removing the status of animals as property, and ending animal testing. Many times, animal rights
activists have carried out raids to release animals from laboratories and farms. There are
4. documented cases where organizations such as the Oxford Arson Squad have participated in acts
of physical violence, arson, and property damage to animal research facilities (Animal extremists
'more violent', 2005). The humane treatment of research animals is certainly a legitimate point;
however, total elimination of animal testing would significantly withhold the discovery of new
medicines, treatments, and other scientific developments.
In today’s society, the concept and understanding of animal health research is changing,
along with the perception of scientists' personalities. In the 1950’s scientists were regarded in
high esteem even though they were not completely understood. In recent times, however,
scientists are often stereotyped as remote, withdrawn, secretive, and unpopular. There is a
common misconception that scientists deliberately inflict harm, pain, distress, or death on
laboratory animals. Andrew Rowan puts it well when he states “There is a constant tug of war in
the public mind between perceptions of the scientist as hero and as villain” (1995). In other
words, scientists are both admired for their contributions to public health but criticized for their
methods involving animal use.
Animal Welfare Regulations
III. According to Rachel Hajar, “issues such as ‘cruelty’ to animals and the humane
treatment of animals are valid concerns, and hence, the use of animals in experimentation is
greatly regulated” (2011). These regulations include but are not limited to pain management and
the use of anesthesia for animal subjects, providing appropriate living conditions, and requiring
proper training to those who handle the animals.
Those in favor of animal experimentation would argue that there are many principles and
regulations involved with animal research that research institutions and organizations must
adhere to which are designed to ensure the best possible treatment of the animals used in a study.
5. For instance, there are many studies that focus on behavior, genetics, diet and exercise among
others that do not cause pain or suffering to the subject. Another principle involves the use of
less complex organisms whenever possible such as fish, birds, and fruit flies. The use of these
organisms would be preferred over mammals in regards to a moral standing, although sometimes
the use of mammals is necessary to the study and cannot be avoided. It is important for society to
understand that laboratory animal facilities are regulated by government agencies and require
researchers to provide justification for using animals.
One of the biggest changes to animal research was the integration of the 3 “R’s, which
serve as guiding principles for the ethics of animal experimentation. The three R’s encourage
individuals to 1) replace animals with non-living models when possible (2) reduce the number of
animals used to obtain sufficient data to answer the research question; and (3) refine animal use
practices to minimize pain and distress, and to enhance the welfare of an animal used (Hajar,
2011). These guidelines have helped buffer some of the negative attitudes of those who feel
uncomfortable with animal experimentation by advocating humane experimental techniques.
By employing the 3Rs when continuing to use animals for scientific research, the scientific
community can affirm its moral conscience as well as uphold its obligation to society to further
the advancement of science for civilization and our public health system.
With a better understanding of the methodologies involved in animal research it is
important to recognize the significant impact that animals have made in public health and
modern medicine. Some of the major influences of animal experimentation on public health
include the development of vaccines, life-saving drugs and treatments, and data regarding
diseases of the past as well as current medical conditions. The development and production of
6. vaccines and antitoxins led to a dramatic increase in the number of animals used in biomedical
research (Franco, 2013).
Contributions of Animal Research to Public Health
IV. The use of animal models has led to the creation of vaccines for diseases like polio,
measles, whooping cough, and others. By the early twentieth century, bacterial diseases had been
studied extensively and the use of antibiotics was beginning to take effect. Viral diseases,
however, were not as well understood. During the 1950s, decades of laboratory research on the
polio virus had improved scientists’ ability to study it and to cultivate it in animals. Without
proper treatment, prevention consisted mostly of advice to avoid beaches, swimming pools, and
crowds during the summer season.
According to the CDC, polio crippled around 35,000 people each year from 1940 to 1950
in the United States alone, making it one of the most feared diseases of the era (Polio, n.d). By
injecting cultured fluid from the polio virus into mice and monkeys, scientists were able to
reproduce paralysis typical of polio in the subjects and ultimately developed a vaccine used to
treat the disease (Hansen, 2009). Without the use of animal models, the virus may have
continued to spread and crippled thousands more people. Franco states that “by the end of the
nineteenth and beginning of the twentieth century, the pharmacopeia had effective, scientifically
tested drugs, a landmark that allowed for an increasing number of people to understand the
importance and validity of scientifically sound medical knowledge and, with it, the relevance of
animal-based research” (2013).
Another important topic of concern regarding animal research involves diseases that can
be transmitted from animals to humans. These diseases are referred to as zoonotic, and have
impacted society throughout history and continue to cause problems. Animals are seen
7. throughout our public health system. Apart from serving as research models, they also represent
sources of food as well as forming a part of our daily lives as companion animals. These
relationships with animals expose us to a number of animal diseases that can be acquired by
humans including rabies, brucellosis, leishmaniasis and echinococcosis. These diseases continue
to occur in many countries causing the deaths of millions of people every year.
Studies show that animals may also be healthy carriers of agents that are pathogenic for
humans but which do not affect the health of the animal (for example, Salmonella and
Campylobacter) (Ducrot, 2011). Regarding zoonotic diseases, animal research provides a
mutually beneficial outcome for both animals and humans by eliminating the disease in both
groups.
One of the most noteworthy cases of animal research involving zoonotic diseases was
that of Louis Pasteur and his influential work on immunology, specifically for the rabies virus.
Louis Pasteur was a French chemist and microbiologist who hypothesized that microorganisms
could be the causative agents of many diseases that affected humans and other animals (Franco,
2013). His study of microorganisms allowed him to develop the “pasteurization” method which
would destroy bacteria found in food that would cause it to spoil. Furthermore, he was able to
identify several types of zoonotic diseases including Staphylococcus, Streptococcus,
Clostridium, as well as the causative agents of anthrax (Franco, 2013).
Rabies in particular was a concerning disease for both animals and humans in the 19th
century. The virus itself causes acute inflammation of the brain and when left untreated leads to
violent movements, a distinct fear of water, an inability to move parts of the body, confusion,
and loss of consciousness (Rabies, 2013). After symptoms appear, rabies almost always results in
death.
8. In his experiments, Pasteur infected rabbits and dogs with the rabies virus in his attempts
to find a cure. The public heavily slated Pasteur’s use of animals, particularly dogs. It was
known, however, that Pasteur was perceptive to animal suffering and used several techniques to
limit the animals’ pain or distress. He made sure that animals were anesthetized whenever
possible to prevent unnecessary suffering and he even use what we now call “humane endpoints”
or euthanasia if he thought the animal was experiencing too much discomfort (Franco, 2013). In
the end, Pasteur was able to create the first vaccine for rabies, one of his many direct
contributions to public health using animal research. The vaccine was also a major development
for veterinary medicine as it saved countless animals from acquiring rabies and enduring the
horrific symptoms.
Similarities Between Animal Models and Humans
V. Yet another reason why animal use is so crucial to our understanding of medicine and
disease is because of their genetic and physiologic resemblance to humans. Many animals,
specifically mammals, share many anatomical and genetic similarities with humans, making
them good models for biological studies. In today’s animal research facilities, rodents such as
mice and rats have been the primary models for studying specific aspects of human pathogenesis
and immunity (Lanzas, 2010). In fact, rodents are the most commonly used laboratory animals,
making up nearly 80% of the total of animals used in the European Union, followed by cold-
blooded animals (fish, amphibians and reptiles, making up a total of 9.6%) and birds (6.3%)
(Franco, 2013).
Historically, Nuno Franco states that “the toning down of the opposition to animal use in
the life sciences had also something to do with the emergence of rodent species as a recurrent
animal model in research” (2013). Seen as sources of disease and considered pests, rodents like
9. mice and rats were despised by the public and therefore made them less worthy of moral
consideration. Scientists took this as an opportunity to use this to their advantage and began to
adopt them as their research models. As it turns out, rodents make excellent research models not
only for their anatomical and physiological similarities but also for their inexpensive housing
costs and care. For genetic studies, rodents reproduce easily and scientists are able to quickly
obtain results over a short period of time.
“In 2002, the mouse became the second mammal, after humans, to have its whole
genome sequenced” (Franco, 2013). Studies have shown that 75% of mouse genes have
equivalents in humans, making them an essential model for human medicine (2002 Release: The
Mouse Genome And The Measure of Man, 2012). Knowing that mice carry virtually the same
sets of genes as humans allows scientists to experimentally test and learn more about the
function of human genes, ultimately leading to better understanding of human disease and the
development of treatments and cures. The improvements in the genome research project, along
with other technologies, have opened unlimited possibilities for the understanding of gene
function and their influence in several genetic and non-genetic diseases.
While rodents are making a significant impact in the laboratory, farm animals are serving
as natural models for a wide range of human infectious diseases at the veterinary and agricultural
level. Veterinary public health is focusing on using farm animals to better understand pathogens
that are shared by both livestock and humans. According to a recent study, more than half of
human infectious diseases are caused by multi-host pathogens for which farm animals are often
natural hosts and serve as infection reservoirs for humans (Lanzas, 2010). The use of farm
animals is becoming increasingly popular for studying infectious disease dynamics at the
population level.
10. Human health is inextricably linked to animal health and production. Farm animals make
up a substantial part of our diet, therefore it is critical to maintain their health and continue to
promote the importance of food safety in public health. For instance, veterinary public health is a
branch of the World Health Organization that focuses on the diagnosis, surveillance,
epidemiology, control, prevention and elimination of zoonotic diseases (Veterinary public health,
n.d.). In doing this, it is incorporating animal research into farm animals and agriculture.
Veterinary public health is also directly involved with the management of health aspects of
laboratory animal facilities and diagnostic laboratories to ensure the wellbeing of animals being
used for biomedical research.
Medical Advancements and Animal Research
VI. Every day, animal research is reaching new heights and expanding our knowledge of
modern medicine. Some of the newer developments in animal research include the new
production of biological products and medical devices as well development of life-saving drugs
such as cancer-fighting agents. Animals have even been used as models in clinical trials for
successful organ transplantation.
Modern technology has brought about a vast amount of new and beneficial devices,
particularly in the field of medicine. Devices such as surgical robotics are being seen in operating
rooms more and more frequently. M. Michael Swindle defines robotic surgery as the “use of a
remote console by a surgeon distant from the patient allowing the user to operate by means of a
virtual three-dimensional procedure” (2007). Robotic surgery with the da Vinci Surgical System
was approved by the Food and Drug Administration in 2000 (Robotic Surgery, n.d). The
technique has been rapidly adopted by hospitals in the United States and other parts of the world
for use in the treatment of a wide range of conditions. Robotic surgery has revolutionized the
11. idea of minimally invasive surgery and has proven to be very useful for common procedures
such as hysterectomies, cholecystectomies, nephrectomies, prostatectomies, among others.
Swine are routinely used as models for robotic surgeries for several reasons. Swine share
many anatomical similarities to humans which make them ideal models for robotic surgical
procedures, which require training both using in vitro and in vivo models (Swindle, 2007). Pigs
have all of the same thoracic and abdominal organs as humans with only minor differences in a
few organs. The most common areas of interests include the cardiovascular, urinary,
integumentary, and digestive systems. Retroperitoneal fat is almost absent in the pig which
facilitates laparoscopic procedures in the abdominal cavity as well allowing medical students and
doctors to enhance their techniques on an animal model before transitioning to a clinical setting
(Ruurda 2003). . Some of the benefits of minimally invasive surgery include: fewer
complications, such as surgical site infection, less pain and blood loss, quicker recovery, and
smaller, less noticeable scars. Technology of this kind is expected to continue to evolve and
improve with the help and use of animal models.
Swine have also effectively served to provide a better understanding of the cardiovascular
system. According to the literature, “the size of the heart and blood vessels in sexually mature
Hanford minipigs is more analogous to the size in humans than is either the dog or the nonhuman
primate” (Swindle, 2012). In fact, studies found that the blood supply to the coronary arteries and
the blood circulatory system of pigs is similar to 90% of the human population making them
ideal candidates for cardiovascular system studies (Swindle 2012).
The use of swine in the biomedical research has created a profound effect in both the
surgical environment as well providing further insight on the anatomical structures and functions
of the human body. Michael Swindle respectfully acknowledges the use of swine in the
12. laboratory when he states that “a brief review can only scratch the surface of the potential for
swine research models, but it illustrates the versatility of the pig and the wide variety of studies
in which pigs can be used” (2012).
Without a doubt, the use of animals in biological research has changed the history of
human medicine. The study of animals of all different species has made it possible to overcome
disease and created the foundations for a better public health system. The question remains, how
long will animal research continue to be necessary for the benefits of science and modern
medicine and when will it be deemed appropriate to discontinue the use of animal models?
Controversy Regarding Retired Animal Research Models
VII. A recent article discusses the controversy of the retirement of hundreds of non-human
primates that are being held for potential medical experimentation. According to the article, the
National Institutes of Health is responsible for hundreds of chimpanzees distributed throughout
several government research facilities, many of whom are aging and have been intentionally
infected with HIV or hepatitis (Bonifield, 2015). Although a few of the chimps have been
relocated to sanctuaries for retirement, more than 300 of them remain at the research facilities
and several have already died waiting on approval for their release.
It is unfortunate for these chimpanzees to be kept in laboratory confinement especially
since the NIH has admitted that scientific advances have rendered the use of non-human primates
largely unnecessary for research (Bonifield, 2015). However, due to the health complications of
the animals, the release of the chimpanzees is a complicated process. The majority of the chimps
have been infected with HIV or hepatitis. These diseases require daily treatments or medications
that could not be easily administered at the sanctuaries.
13. The unusual circumstances of these chimpanzees creates a dilemma associated with the
long term effects of research studies and brings up the ethical problems regarding the quality of
life of the animals. These are the challenges that society faces concerning animal models for
research and many times it is uncertain what should be the best approach to these types of
situations. Ultimately, scientists should make every effort to obtain the most relevant data and
information from these animals and attempt to use alternative and more efficient models for
upcoming projects.
Conclusion
Overall, there is an overwhelming amount of evidence illustrating how animal models
have impacted our public health system and contributed to our understanding of modern
medicine. The purpose of this paper was to illustrate the necessity of animal research for medical
advancements and improvements in our public health system as well discuss the history, ethics,
and numerous contributions animal models have made to biomedical science.
With each century came new changes and developments that improved both the lives of
humans and animals. From discovering life-saving vaccines that helped eradicate disease to
improving surgical skills of today’s doctors, animals have undoubtedly impacted the scientific
community. Still, animal research remains a controversial matter. It is crucial to acknowledge
that when used appropriately, animal medicine can save both the lives of humans and other
animals. Moreover, government agencies have made strenuous efforts to ensure that animal
models used in biological research receive the best treatment and quality of life. New regulations
and principles regarding animal experimentation have allowed society to be more accepting of it
and encouraged researchers to refine their studies so that they can obtain the most data from each
experiment. If used in an appropriate and responsible manner, animals used in biomedical
14. research can continue to serve as a leading scientific means of medical advancement and remain
an ongoing source of improvement to our public health system.
15. References
2002 Release: The Mouse Genome And The Measure of Man. (2012, July 27). Retrieved
February 11, 2015, from http://www.genome.gov/page.cfm?pageID=10005831
Animal extremists 'more violent' (2005, September 28). Retrieved February 17, 2015, from
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/4290174.stmBonifield, J., & Cohen, E. (2015,
February 7).
Chimps still stuck in research labs despite promise of retirement - CNN.com. Retrieved February
15, 2015, from http://www.cnn.com/2015/02/06/health/research-chimps-stuck-in-labs/
Ducrot et al.: Issues and special features of animal health research. Veterinary Research 2011
42:96.
Franco, N. H. (2013). Animal Experiments in Biomedical Research: A Historical Perspective.
Animals (2076-2615), 3(1), 238-273. doi:10.3390/ani3010238
Hansen, B. (2009). Picturing Medical Progress From Pasteur to Polio : A History of Mass Media
Images and Popular Attitudes in America. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University
Press.
Hajar, R. (2011). Animal Testing and Medicine. Heart Views : The Official Journal of the Gulf
Heart Association, 12(1), 42. doi:10.4103/1995-705X.81548
[Illustration of Laboratory Rat ]. Retrieved February 15, 2015 from http://bionews-
tx.com/news/2014/01/28/high-folic-acid-supplementation-increases-breast-cancer-
growth-characteristics-rats/
Lanzas, C., Ayscue, P., Ivanek, R., & Gröhn, Y. (2010). Model or meal? Farm animal
populations as models for infectious diseases of humans. Nature Reviews Microbiology.
16. Polio. (n.d.). Retrieved February 5, 2015, from
http://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/diseases/poliomyelitits
Rabies. (2013, September 24). Retrieved February 6, 2015, from http://www.cdc.gov/rabies/
Ruurda, J., Draaisma, W., Hillegersberg, R., Rinkes, I., Gooszen, H., Janssen, L., ... Broeders, I.
(2003). Robot-Assisted Endoscopic Surgery: A Four-Year Single-Center Experience.
Digestive Surgery, 313-320.
Swindle, M. (2007). Swine in the Laboratory Surgery, Anesthesia, Imaging, and Experimental
Techniques, Second Edition. Hoboken: CRC Press
Swindle, M., Makin, A., Herron, A., Clubb, F., & Frazier, K. (2012). Swine as Models in
Biomedical Research and Toxicology Testing. Veterinary Pathology, 344-356.
Veterinary public health (VPH). (n.d.). Retrieved February 11, 2015, from
http://www.who.int/zoonoses/vph/en/