Clinical Psychology helps to analyze the human behaviours like mental, emotional and behavioural disorders and diagnose, treat and prevent mental disorders.
Read more: http://www.tauedu.org/school-of-behavioral-science.html
Ethical issues in psychological researchMedhaDebnath
Ethical Issues In Psychological Research
PRESENTED BY: Medha Debnath
APPLICATION NO: 1ac820aee58c11e9857d4723808534dd
AFFILIATION: BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY
Ethics, a very important part of psychological research which play major role in the conduction of psychological research it's about the moral values and social norms which applies to all Researchers and there are a comprehensive guidelines about ethics given by American Psychological Association 2013 listed in this presentation.
Clinical Psychology helps to analyze the human behaviours like mental, emotional and behavioural disorders and diagnose, treat and prevent mental disorders.
Read more: http://www.tauedu.org/school-of-behavioral-science.html
Ethical issues in psychological researchMedhaDebnath
Ethical Issues In Psychological Research
PRESENTED BY: Medha Debnath
APPLICATION NO: 1ac820aee58c11e9857d4723808534dd
AFFILIATION: BANARAS HINDU UNIVERSITY
Ethics, a very important part of psychological research which play major role in the conduction of psychological research it's about the moral values and social norms which applies to all Researchers and there are a comprehensive guidelines about ethics given by American Psychological Association 2013 listed in this presentation.
experimental psychology history, experimental psychology lecture, beginning of experimental psychology, experimental method in psychology in English, experimental psychology introduction, a level psychology experimental method, nature of experimental psychology, experimental psychology overview
For More Relevant Presentation Visit my Website:
http://jobsforworld.blogspot.com/2015/12/presentation-of-education.html
experimental psychology history, experimental psychology lecture, beginning of experimental psychology, experimental method in psychology in English, experimental psychology introduction, a level psychology experimental method, nature of experimental psychology, experimental psychology overview
For More Relevant Presentation Visit my Website:
http://jobsforworld.blogspot.com/2015/12/presentation-of-education.html
Use the Capella library to locate two psychology research articles.docxdickonsondorris
Use the Capella library to locate two psychology research articles: a quantitative methods article and a qualitative methods article. These do not need to be on the same topic, but if you have a research topic in mind for your proposal (see Assessment 5), you may wish to pick something similar for this assessment. Read each article carefully.
Then, in a 2–3-page assessment, address the following elements:
1 Summarize the research question and hypothesis, the research methods, and the overall findings.
2 Compare the research methodologies used in each study. In what ways are the methodologies similar? In what ways are they different? (Be sure to use the technical psychological terms we are studying.)
3 Describe the sample and sample size for each study. Which one used a larger sample and why? How were participants selected?
4 Describe the data collection process for each study. What methods were used to collect the data? Surveys? Observations? Interviews? Be specific and discuss the instruments or measures fully—what do they measure? How is the test designed?
5 Summarize the data analysis process for each study. How was the data analyzed? Were statistics used? Were interviews coded?
6 In conclusion, craft 1–2 paragraphs explaining how these two articles illustrate the main differences between quantitative and qualitative research.
Additional Requirements
· Written communication: Written communication should be free of errors that detract from the overall message.
· APA formatting: Your assessment should be formatted according to APA (6th ed.) style and formatting.
· Length: A typical response will be 2–3 typed and double-spaced pages.
Font and font size: Times New Roman, 12 point.
Research Methods
There are many different types of research studies, and the type of study that is done depends very much on the research question. Some studies demand strictly numerical data, such as a comparison of GPA among different college majors or weight loss among different types of eating programs. Others require more in-depth data, like interview responses. Such studies might include the lived experience of people that have been through a terrorist attack or understanding the experience of being physically disabled on a college campus. While there are a number of different types of studies that can be done, all of them fall under two basic categories: quantitative and qualitative.
Quantitative Research
Quantitative research deals with numerical data. This means that any topic you study in a quantitative study must be quantifiable—grades, weight, height, depression, and intelligence are all things that can be quantified on some scale of measurement. Quantitative data is often considered hard data—numbers are seen as concrete, irrefutable evidence, but we have to take into account a number of factors that could impact such data. Errors in measurement and recording of such data, as well as the influence of other factors outside those in the study, make for ...
Page 1 of 2Research-Based Interventions on Schizophrenia and D.docxalfred4lewis58146
Page 1 of 2
Research-Based Interventions on Schizophrenia and Dissociative Identity Disorder
Select ONE: Schizophrenic or Dissociative identity disorders
Use the Research Analysis Job Aid to complete this assignment (see the chart below)
Prepare a 1,050- to 1,500-word paper that discusses research-based interventions to treat psychopathology.
Review and differentiate the characteristics of the selected disorder and discuss the research about intervention strategies for the disorder by completing the following:
· Evaluate three peer reviewed research studies using: Research Analysis.
· Conceptualize the disorder using the biopsychosocial or diathesis-stress models.
· Discuss the treatments or interventions that have been shown to be the most effective for your selected disorder. Why?
Cite at least five peer-reviewed sources.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Research Analysis
Terms
Definitions
Peer-reviewed study
Peer review refers to a study that has been accepted by a standard journal using blind review by peers in the field. This means that every study should have a fair access to publication based upon quality of the study.
Type of study
Types of studies can include experimental, case study, longitudinal, cross-sectional, survey, and so forth.
Measurement or assessment tools
A measurement tool is a means that the researchers used to measure or assess the variables under study. Did the study develop assessment tools? Did the study use objective measurement tools? Can the measurement tools be found and used by another researcher? Are the instruments valid and reliable?
Number of participants
This refers to how many participants were in the study.
How they were selected
Selection process can include the means of recruitment of participants; what was the sampling method or strategy? Describe the population. This could be clients or college students. Indicate sample size.
Number of groups
Was there a control group? The control group does not receive the treatment. Do these participants have the same characteristics and diagnosis as the experimental group participants?
How they were assigned
Were they matched or randomly assigned to one the conditions, or groups, in the study?
What type of intervention was delivered
Define the type of therapeutic treatment or intervention that occurred.
How the intervention was delivered
Were there therapists? Were the therapists trained to deliver the treatment? Was the study a drug study? Was it double-blind?
Were there repeated measures
In this area, we are looking at whether the study found the subjects 6 months or 1 year after the conclusion of the study. Was there a difference between the experimental and control participants at the follow up? We are looking at whether the treatment effect lasts over time.
.
(1) Critique Template for a Qualitative StudyNURS 6052Week.docxkatherncarlyle
(1): Critique Template for a Qualitative Study
NURS 6052
Week 6 Assignment: Application: Critiquing Quantitative, Qualitative, or Mixed Methods Studies (due by Day 7 of Week 7)
Date:
Your name:
Article reference (in APA style):
URL:
What is a critique? Simply stated, a critique is a critical analysis undertaken for some purpose. Nurses critique research for three main reasons: to improve their practice, to broaden their understanding, and to provide a base for the conduct of a study.
When the purpose is to improve practice, nurses must give special consideration to questions such as these:
· Are the research findings appropriate to my practice setting and situation?
· What further research or pilot studies need to be done, if any, before incorporating findings into practice to assure both safety and effectiveness?
· How might a proposed change in practice trigger changes in other aspects of practice?
To help you synthesize your learning throughout this course and prepare you to utilize research in your practice, you will be critiquing a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed-methods research study of your choice.
If the article is unavailable in a full-text version through the Walden University Library, you must e-mail the article as a PDF or Word attachment to your Instructor.
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH CRITIQUE
1. Research Issue and Purpose
What is the research question or issue of the referenced study? What is its purpose? (Sometimes ONLY the purpose is stated clearly and the question must be inferred from the introductory discussion of the purpose.)
2. Researcher Pre-understandings
Does the article include a discussion of the researcher’s pre-understandings? What does the article disclose about the researcher’s professional and personal perspectives on the research problem?
3. Literature Review
What is the quality of the literature review? Is the literature review current, relevant? Is there evidence that the author critiqued the literature or merely reported it without critique? Is there an integrated summary of the current knowledge base regarding the research problem, or does the literature review contain opinion or anecdotal articles without any synthesis or summary of the whole? (Sometimes the literature review is incorporated into the introductory section without being explicitly identified.)
4. Theoretical or Conceptual Framework
Is a theoretical or conceptual framework identified? If so, what is it? Is it a nursing framework or one drawn from another discipline? (Sometimes there is no explicitly identified theoretical or conceptual framework; in addition, many “nursing” research studies draw on a “borrowed” framework, e.g., stress, medical pathology, etc.)
5. Participants
Who were the participants? Is the setting or study group adequately described? Is the setting appropriate for the research question? What type of sampling strategy was used? Was it appropriate? Was the sample size adequate? Did t ...
For this assignment you willwrite a paper using TOPIC 1 QUANTITAT.docxtemplestewart19
For this assignment you willwrite a paper using TOPIC 1: QUANTITATIVERESEARCH &TOPIC 2:QUALITATIVE RESEARCH. Do not worry about the word count as this is not part of the grading criteria for this assignment. Below is a template of how the paper should be setup. This paper will be in APA format. In the template below I am providing a sample of the headers that should be used in APA format to organize your paper. I would highly recommend using them in your paper.
The introduction should introduce the paper. The intro would also include your thesis statement. The thesis tells the reader what will be discussed in the rest of the paper. This section should be in first paragraphs.
PICOT Statement
Revise the PICOT statement you wrote - PICOT Statements: (1). Changes in leisure time physical activity preference and development of hypertension were significantly correlated, especially among urban Chinese. Hypertension prevention programs may identify the groups at elevated risk by examining levels and changes of LTPA preferences. (2). Hypertension is a major health concern that leads to many complications besides the heart attack, heart failure and other related issues. Therefore, this study will help in studying the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) so as to arrive at the solutions. The study will aim at answering the question, how to treat to lower systolic blood pressure. (3). There are several reasons that contributed to non-adherence to treatment in hypertensive patients. Diversity of these reasons is an indication that design and implementation of different kinds of interventions are required in order to increase the patients' awareness, empower them and encourage self-efficacy.” Based on these provide justification of the problem and supporting evidence from multiple resources to justify why this is a problem. This section should be 1-2 paragraphs.
Research Critiques
Use the research critiques to complete this assignment that has both qualitative and quantitative.
Qualitative Studies
Background of the study. Answer the following questions in narrative form regarding the qualitative studies in this section.
· Identify the clinical problem and research problem that led to the study. What was not known about the clinical problem that, if understood, could be used to improve health care delivery or patient outcomes? This gap in knowledge is the research problem.
· How did the author establish the significance of the study? In other words, why should the reader care about this study? Look for statements about human suffering, costs of treatment, or the number of people affected by the clinical problem.
· Identify the purpose of the study. An author may clearly state the purpose of the study or may describe the purpose as the study goals, objectives, or aims.
· List research questions that the study was designed to answer. If the author does not explicitly provide the questions, attempt to infer the questions from the answers.
.
Research problem is a question that a researcher wants to answer or a problem that a researcher wants to solve. Identification and formulation of a research problem is the first step of the research process.
However, it is considered as one of the most challenging and difficult phases of any research project. It is believed that selection of a good research problem is a discovery in itself.
Selection of a research problem depends on several factors, such as researcher's knowledge, skills, interest, expertise, motivation, and creativity with respect to the subject of inquiry.
In addition, a researcher needs to ensure that a selected problem has high significance and implication for his or her profession as well as it should be a suitable, feasible, testable, and solvable research problem.
It is believed that most of the good research studies need lots of time for selection of a research problem. Initially, every researcher faces the predicament of identifying, selecting, and formulating a good research problem. This chapter will answer these pertinent questions.
Overview of Evidence-basedPractice and the Research Pro.docxLacieKlineeb
Overview of Evidence-based
Practice and the Research Process
What is EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE?
A systematic review of critical appraisal and synthesis of the most relevant research.
Clinical Expertise
Patient Preferences and Values
Initiatives to Advance EBP
To Err is Human: Institute of Medicine (IOM): Building a Safer Health System
Initiatives driving the movement
IOM’s goal: By 2020, 90% health care will be evidence-based
US Preventive Services Task Force (sponsored by AHRQ): analyzing evidence and publishing guidelines (Guide to Preventive Clinical Services)
Magnet Recognition Program (ANA): mandate nursing research and use of EBP
Goal of EBP
OPTIMUM PATIENT OUTCOMES
Once you begin to look for
evidence-based projects,
you’ll start to see them everywhere!
SOURCES OF EVIDENCE
Research Findings
Agency quality monitoring data
Data from national databases
Expert opinions
Scientific principles
Research prOCESS
Conducting Research:
Steps of the Research Process
1. Identify issue or question
2. Formulate research question
3. Review the literature
If further research is needed:
4. Determine theoretical framework
5. Design the study
6. Select the sample
7. Collect data
8. Analyze data
9. Interpret results
If indicated, change practice!
Step ONE: Identify issue
Step Two: formulate Research Question
Conducting Research: Formulating the research question
Research Questions (quantitative):
Identify the target population
State an intervention or treatment (independent variable)
List the variables to be measured/outcomes (dependent variables)
Sample Research Question
Do pediatric patients who are given a
reward when they cooperate during
nursing procedures tend to be more
cooperative during those procedures
than unrewarded peers?
12
Sample Research Question
What are the relationships among spiritual well-being, sleep quality, and health status in HIV-infected men and women?
13
Conducting Research: Formulating the research question
Research Question:
What are the effects of weekly quizzes on the grades of nursing students?
What is the target audience?
What is the independent variable?
What is the dependent variable?
Conducting Research: Formulating the research question
Research Question:
Do nursing students who participate in study groups earn higher grades on final exams?
What is the target audience?
What is the independent variable?
What is the dependent variable?
Conducting Research: Formulating the research question
Research Question:
Is there a difference in patient satisfaction scores between patients who have had nursing students care for them and patients who have not had nursing students assigned to them?
What is the target audience?
What is the independent variable?
What is the dependent variable?
Avoid “Yes” or “No” Question Formats
.
Operation “Blue Star” is the only event in the history of Independent India where the state went into war with its own people. Even after about 40 years it is not clear if it was culmination of states anger over people of the region, a political game of power or start of dictatorial chapter in the democratic setup.
The people of Punjab felt alienated from main stream due to denial of their just demands during a long democratic struggle since independence. As it happen all over the word, it led to militant struggle with great loss of lives of military, police and civilian personnel. Killing of Indira Gandhi and massacre of innocent Sikhs in Delhi and other India cities was also associated with this movement.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
A review of the growth of the Israel Genealogy Research Association Database Collection for the last 12 months. Our collection is now passed the 3 million mark and still growing. See which archives have contributed the most. See the different types of records we have, and which years have had records added. You can also see what we have for the future.
Biological screening of herbal drugs: Introduction and Need for
Phyto-Pharmacological Screening, New Strategies for evaluating
Natural Products, In vitro evaluation techniques for Antioxidants, Antimicrobial and Anticancer drugs. In vivo evaluation techniques
for Anti-inflammatory, Antiulcer, Anticancer, Wound healing, Antidiabetic, Hepatoprotective, Cardio protective, Diuretics and
Antifertility, Toxicity studies as per OECD guidelines
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Synthetic Fiber Construction in lab .pptxPavel ( NSTU)
Synthetic fiber production is a fascinating and complex field that blends chemistry, engineering, and environmental science. By understanding these aspects, students can gain a comprehensive view of synthetic fiber production, its impact on society and the environment, and the potential for future innovations. Synthetic fibers play a crucial role in modern society, impacting various aspects of daily life, industry, and the environment. ynthetic fibers are integral to modern life, offering a range of benefits from cost-effectiveness and versatility to innovative applications and performance characteristics. While they pose environmental challenges, ongoing research and development aim to create more sustainable and eco-friendly alternatives. Understanding the importance of synthetic fibers helps in appreciating their role in the economy, industry, and daily life, while also emphasizing the need for sustainable practices and innovation.
2. Conducting Research in
Clinical Psychology
• Why do clinical psychologists do research?
Treatment outcome
Assessment methods
Diagnostic issues
Professional issues
Teaching and training issues
3. • Efficacy
The success of a particular therapy in a
controlled study conducted with clients
who meet specific criteria.
In short, how well a therapy works “in
the lab.”
Research on Treatment
Outcome
4. • Effectiveness
The success of a therapy in actual clinical settings in
which client problems are not limited to predetermined
criteria.
In short, how well a therapy works “in the real world.”
1995 Consumer Reports survey of readers is an example
Generally positive toward psychotherapy, but scientific rigor
is questionable
Research on Treatment
Outcome
5. Research on Treatment
Outcome
• Statistical vs. Clinical (“real world”)
Significance.
• Statistical significance doesn’t
necessarily mean clinical significance.
6. • Internal validity
The extent to which change in the DV is due to
change in the IV.
Generally high in efficacy studies.
• External validity
Generalizability of result.
Generally high in effectiveness studies.
Research on Treatment
Outcome
7. Research on Assessment
Methods
Examples can include:
Validation or expanded use of assessment tools.
Establishing psychometric data for assessment
tools.
Comparing multiple assessment tools to each
other.
Others
8. Research on Diagnostic
Issues
Examples can include:
Examine reliability or validity of diagnostic
constructs.
Examine relationships between disorders.
Prevalence or course of disorders.
Others
9. Research on Professional
Issues
Examples can include psychologists’:
Beliefs
Activities
Practices
Other aspects of their professional lives
10. Research on Teaching and
Training Issues
Examples can include:
Training philosophies
Specific coursework
Opportunities for specialized training
Outcome of training efforts
Comparison to training in similar disciplines
Others
11. How Do Clinical
Psychologists Do Research?
1. The Experimental Method
Observation of events
Hypothesis
Define independent and dependent variables
Empirically test the hypothesis
Alter hypothesis as necessary per results
12. How Do Clinical Psychologists
Do Research? (cont.)
2. Quasi-experiments
Used in place of true experiments when
practical, ethical, or other issues limit
manipulations.
Less scientifically sound than true
experiments, but common in clinical
psychology.
How Do Clinical
Psychologists Do Research?
13. How Do Clinical Psychologists
Do Research? (cont.)
3. Between-group Designs
Participants in different conditions receive entirely
different treatments.
Often, an experimental condition vs. a control group.
4. Within-group Designs
Compare participants in a single condition to selves at
different points in time.
5. Mixed-group Designs
Combination of between- and within-group.
How Do Clinical
Psychologists Do Research?
14. How Do Clinical Psychologists
Do Research? (cont.)
6. Analogue Designs
Used when actual clinical populations or
situations can’t be accessed.
An approximation or simulation of the
“real thing.”
How Do Clinical
Psychologists Do Research?
15. How Do Clinical Psychologists
Do Research? (cont.)
7. Correlational Designs
Examine relationship between two or
more variables.
Causality cannot be determined.
Often used when experimental or quasi-
experimental designs are not feasible.
How Do Clinical
Psychologists Do Research?
16. How Do Clinical Psychologists
Do Research? (cont.)
8. Case Studies
Detailed examination of a single person or
situation; often very clinically relevant.
Often qualitative rather than quantitative.
Demonstrates the idiographic approach to
research (vs. nomothetic approach).
Can inspire more systematic research.
ABAB design is one example.
Alternately apply and remove a treatment.
How Do Clinical
Psychologists Do Research?
17. How Do Clinical Psychologists
Do Research? (cont.)
9. Meta-analysis
Statistical method of combining results of
separate studies into a single summary
finding.
Findings are translated into effect sizes.
Can quantitatively capture the trends of many
individual studies.
Examples include meta-analyses of
psychotherapy outcome.
How Do Clinical
Psychologists Do Research?
18. How Do Clinical Psychologists
Do Research? (cont.)
10. Cross-sectional Designs
Compare participants at a single point in time.
More efficient than longitudinal designs.
11. Longitudinal Designs
Compare participants at different points in time.
Less efficient than cross-sectional designs, but
can be more valid in assessing change across
time.
How Do Clinical
Psychologists Do Research?
19. Ethical Issues in Research
in Clinical Psychology
Numerous APA ethical standards specifically
address research:
Obtain informed consent
Don’t coerce participation
Use deception only when justified and necessary
Minimize harm to participants
Don’t fabricate or falsify data
Assign authorship appropriately
Share data with other researchers for verification