This document outlines an agenda for a class on critically appraising medical literature. It begins with reviewing the health science research process and types of research studies. It then discusses what a critical appraisal is and how to appraise a research paper. Key questions to ask when appraising medical literature are presented. The document reviews levels of evidence and study types like randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and case-control studies. It provides guidance on critically appraising diagnostic studies, intervention studies, and calculating p-values. An in-class appraisal activity is planned to conclude the session.
"Hierarchies of Evidence" is an important but problematic concept for medical professionals to understand as it underpins their capacity to be effective practitioners and researchers.
"Hierarchies of Evidence" is an important but problematic concept for medical professionals to understand as it underpins their capacity to be effective practitioners and researchers.
A presentation on what is a Medical Journal Club and its value in clinical and academic training with the headings necessary for inclusion in a PowerPoint presentation.
Also contains Hyperlinks to useful CAT sites.
Critical appraisal is the process of carefully and systematically analyze the research paper to judge its trustworthiness, its value and relevance in a particular context. (Amanda Burls 2009)
A critical review must identify the strengths and limitations in a research paper and this should be carried out in a systematic manner.
The Critical Appraisal helps in developing the necessary skills to make sense of scientific evidence, based on validity, results and relevance.
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH METHODS: Secondary and tertiary StudiesDr. Khaled OUANES
Secondary analyses are based on the use of pre-existing data sets and usually the researcher conducting the statistical analysis has not had any contact with the participants whose data are being examined.
A systematic review is, on the other hand, the thorough compilation and summary of all publications relevant to a particular research topic.
A presentation on what is a Medical Journal Club and its value in clinical and academic training with the headings necessary for inclusion in a PowerPoint presentation.
Also contains Hyperlinks to useful CAT sites.
Critical appraisal is the process of carefully and systematically analyze the research paper to judge its trustworthiness, its value and relevance in a particular context. (Amanda Burls 2009)
A critical review must identify the strengths and limitations in a research paper and this should be carried out in a systematic manner.
The Critical Appraisal helps in developing the necessary skills to make sense of scientific evidence, based on validity, results and relevance.
HEALTHCARE RESEARCH METHODS: Secondary and tertiary StudiesDr. Khaled OUANES
Secondary analyses are based on the use of pre-existing data sets and usually the researcher conducting the statistical analysis has not had any contact with the participants whose data are being examined.
A systematic review is, on the other hand, the thorough compilation and summary of all publications relevant to a particular research topic.
The literature review is not merely a simple compilation or a list of every item and resource with any possible relation to your topic. A good literature review is a critical appraisal of narrowly focused, selected and truly relevant work that provides the current status (perspective) of the topic. This presentation basically is a brief guide on the process of doing and writing a literature review for a thesis, research proposal, research paper, etc.
2011-10-27 In Search of Affordable Textbooks: How OER Can Reduce Costs (Open ...Nicole Allen
The average student spends more than $1000 on textbooks each year. Learn how OER is reversing that trend and what you can do to help.
27 October 2011
Open Education Conference
Park City, UT
Page 1 of 2Research-Based Interventions on Schizophrenia and D.docxalfred4lewis58146
Page 1 of 2
Research-Based Interventions on Schizophrenia and Dissociative Identity Disorder
Select ONE: Schizophrenic or Dissociative identity disorders
Use the Research Analysis Job Aid to complete this assignment (see the chart below)
Prepare a 1,050- to 1,500-word paper that discusses research-based interventions to treat psychopathology.
Review and differentiate the characteristics of the selected disorder and discuss the research about intervention strategies for the disorder by completing the following:
· Evaluate three peer reviewed research studies using: Research Analysis.
· Conceptualize the disorder using the biopsychosocial or diathesis-stress models.
· Discuss the treatments or interventions that have been shown to be the most effective for your selected disorder. Why?
Cite at least five peer-reviewed sources.
Format your paper consistent with APA guidelines.Research Analysis
Terms
Definitions
Peer-reviewed study
Peer review refers to a study that has been accepted by a standard journal using blind review by peers in the field. This means that every study should have a fair access to publication based upon quality of the study.
Type of study
Types of studies can include experimental, case study, longitudinal, cross-sectional, survey, and so forth.
Measurement or assessment tools
A measurement tool is a means that the researchers used to measure or assess the variables under study. Did the study develop assessment tools? Did the study use objective measurement tools? Can the measurement tools be found and used by another researcher? Are the instruments valid and reliable?
Number of participants
This refers to how many participants were in the study.
How they were selected
Selection process can include the means of recruitment of participants; what was the sampling method or strategy? Describe the population. This could be clients or college students. Indicate sample size.
Number of groups
Was there a control group? The control group does not receive the treatment. Do these participants have the same characteristics and diagnosis as the experimental group participants?
How they were assigned
Were they matched or randomly assigned to one the conditions, or groups, in the study?
What type of intervention was delivered
Define the type of therapeutic treatment or intervention that occurred.
How the intervention was delivered
Were there therapists? Were the therapists trained to deliver the treatment? Was the study a drug study? Was it double-blind?
Were there repeated measures
In this area, we are looking at whether the study found the subjects 6 months or 1 year after the conclusion of the study. Was there a difference between the experimental and control participants at the follow up? We are looking at whether the treatment effect lasts over time.
.
Chapter 2
Study Designs
Learning Objectives
• List and define the components of a good
study design
• Compare and contrast observational and
experimental study designs
• Summarize the advantages and disadvantages
of alternative study designs
Learning Objectives
• Describe the key features of a randomized
controlled trial
• Identify the study designs used in public health
and medical studies
Study Designs
• Observational Studies
– Case-series study
– Cross-sectional (prevalence) survey
– Case-control study
– Cohort study
• Experimental Studies
– Randomized Controlled (Clinical) Trial
Inferences
• Observational studies – inferences limited to descriptions
and associations; with carefully designed analysis can
make stronger inferences (statistical adjustment)
• Experimental studies – cause and effect
In ALL studies – need careful definition of disease
(outcome) and exposure (risk factor)
Which Design is Best
• Depends on the study question
• What is current knowledge on topic
• How common is disease (and risk factors)
• How long would study take, what are costs
• Ethical issues
Case Report/Case Series
• Observational study
• Case report: Detailed report of specific
features of case
• Case series: Systematic review of common
features of a small number of cases
• Advantage: Cost-efficient
• Disadvantages: No comparison group, no
specific research question
Case-Series
• Simplest design – description of interesting
observations in a small number of individuals
• Usually case-series do not involve control patients
(i.e., patients free of disease)
• Usually lead to generation of hypotheses for more
formal testing
• Criticisms: not planned – no research hypotheses
Case-Series
• Gottleib (1981) studied 5 young homosexual
men with rare form of pneumonia and other
unusual infections
• Initial report was followed by more series (26
cases in NY and CA; “cluster” in southern CA;
34 cases among Haitians, etc.)
• Condition termed AIDS in 1982
Cross-Sectional Survey
• Observational study conducted at a point in
time
• Advantages: Cost-efficient, easy to implement,
ethical
• Disadvantages: No temporal information, non-
response bias
Cross-Sectional Survey
• Is there an association between diabetes and
cardiovascular disease (CVD)?
Patients
with
Diabetes
Patients without
Diabetes
Patients with
CVD
Prospective Cohort Study
• Observational study involving a group (cohort)
of individuals who meet inclusion criteria
followed prospectively in time for risk factor
and outcome information
• Advantages: Can assess temporal relationships
• Disadvantages: Need large numbers for rare
outcomes, confounding
Cohort Study
• Is there an association between hypertension and
cardiovascular disease?
CVD
Hypertension
No CVD
Cohort
CVD
No Hypertension
No CVD
Study Start Time
Cohort Studies
• Identify a group of individuals that meet
inclusion crit ...
This guide will help Chapman University organic chemistry students use SciFinder to find an article that describes a lab purification procedure. Students will summarize the purification procedure in their lab report.
What ARE we thinking? Collections decisions in an Academic LibraryLinda Galloway
When faced with multiple competing priorities for investment in library resources, there are many important aspects to consider. From student enrollment to prominence of programs, there are both data-driven and intangible factors to weigh. In addition, most library collections now focus on the immediate needs of students and researchers instead of collecting for posterity. This just-in-time versus just-in-case collection development mindset prioritizes different resource attributes and requires an often unfamiliar level of acquisitions flexibility.
Google Scholar Citations... Own your profile!Linda Galloway
Use Google Scholar Citations to showcase and promote your academic products. By claiming and populating your profile, researchers all over the world can become aware of your work.
Leveraging Academic Networks for Promotion and Tenure Linda Galloway
Leveraging the power of academic and professional online networks can enhance and showcase an information professional’s scholarly output. From blog posts to peer-reviewed journal articles, knowing how to best promote your work will make the process easier. The presentation will include an overview of best practices for academic networking and provide participants with recommendations to build a solid online network.
Co-author: Anne Rauh
Advanced Forensic Science (FSC 406) library information - how to find books, articles and web resources. Includes information on evaluating and citing sourcesl.
Introduction to Altmetrics for Medical and Special LibrariansLinda Galloway
Altmetrics (or alternative citation metrics) provide new ways to track scholarly influence across a wide range of media and platforms. This presentation covers altmetric fundamentals, tips on connecting your users with altmetrics, and an overview of newly published research. Presented as part of the NN/LM MAR Boost Box Series; http://nnlm.gov/mar/training/boost_mar2014.pdf
Citation Metrics: Established and Emerging ToolsLinda Galloway
An overview of established and emerging citation analysis tools including Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar Citations and altmetric tools used to measure scholarly influence. The presenter will compare and contrast these tools and provide an example of a basic search in each resource.
This is a presentation by Dada Robert in a Your Skill Boost masterclass organised by the Excellence Foundation for South Sudan (EFSS) on Saturday, the 25th and Sunday, the 26th of May 2024.
He discussed the concept of quality improvement, emphasizing its applicability to various aspects of life, including personal, project, and program improvements. He defined quality as doing the right thing at the right time in the right way to achieve the best possible results and discussed the concept of the "gap" between what we know and what we do, and how this gap represents the areas we need to improve. He explained the scientific approach to quality improvement, which involves systematic performance analysis, testing and learning, and implementing change ideas. He also highlighted the importance of client focus and a team approach to quality improvement.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
The Indian economy is classified into different sectors to simplify the analysis and understanding of economic activities. For Class 10, it's essential to grasp the sectors of the Indian economy, understand their characteristics, and recognize their importance. This guide will provide detailed notes on the Sectors of the Indian Economy Class 10, using specific long-tail keywords to enhance comprehension.
For more information, visit-www.vavaclasses.com
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
The Roman Empire A Historical Colossus.pdfkaushalkr1407
The Roman Empire, a vast and enduring power, stands as one of history's most remarkable civilizations, leaving an indelible imprint on the world. It emerged from the Roman Republic, transitioning into an imperial powerhouse under the leadership of Augustus Caesar in 27 BCE. This transformation marked the beginning of an era defined by unprecedented territorial expansion, architectural marvels, and profound cultural influence.
The empire's roots lie in the city of Rome, founded, according to legend, by Romulus in 753 BCE. Over centuries, Rome evolved from a small settlement to a formidable republic, characterized by a complex political system with elected officials and checks on power. However, internal strife, class conflicts, and military ambitions paved the way for the end of the Republic. Julius Caesar’s dictatorship and subsequent assassination in 44 BCE created a power vacuum, leading to a civil war. Octavian, later Augustus, emerged victorious, heralding the Roman Empire’s birth.
Under Augustus, the empire experienced the Pax Romana, a 200-year period of relative peace and stability. Augustus reformed the military, established efficient administrative systems, and initiated grand construction projects. The empire's borders expanded, encompassing territories from Britain to Egypt and from Spain to the Euphrates. Roman legions, renowned for their discipline and engineering prowess, secured and maintained these vast territories, building roads, fortifications, and cities that facilitated control and integration.
The Roman Empire’s society was hierarchical, with a rigid class system. At the top were the patricians, wealthy elites who held significant political power. Below them were the plebeians, free citizens with limited political influence, and the vast numbers of slaves who formed the backbone of the economy. The family unit was central, governed by the paterfamilias, the male head who held absolute authority.
Culturally, the Romans were eclectic, absorbing and adapting elements from the civilizations they encountered, particularly the Greeks. Roman art, literature, and philosophy reflected this synthesis, creating a rich cultural tapestry. Latin, the Roman language, became the lingua franca of the Western world, influencing numerous modern languages.
Roman architecture and engineering achievements were monumental. They perfected the arch, vault, and dome, constructing enduring structures like the Colosseum, Pantheon, and aqueducts. These engineering marvels not only showcased Roman ingenuity but also served practical purposes, from public entertainment to water supply.
Model Attribute Check Company Auto PropertyCeline George
In Odoo, the multi-company feature allows you to manage multiple companies within a single Odoo database instance. Each company can have its own configurations while still sharing common resources such as products, customers, and suppliers.
How to Make a Field invisible in Odoo 17Celine George
It is possible to hide or invisible some fields in odoo. Commonly using “invisible” attribute in the field definition to invisible the fields. This slide will show how to make a field invisible in odoo 17.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
1. PT650 1A
Scientific Inquiry I:
Critical Appraisal of Medical
Literature
Linda Galloway
lgallowa@chapman.edu
Health Sciences Librarian, Rinker Health Science Campus
June 30, 2016
2. Today’s Agenda
• Review of health science research process
• Types of research studies and levels of evidence
• Critical appraisal of research studies
• What is a Critical Appraisal?
• How to appraise a research paper
• In-class appraisal activity
3. ASK ACQUIRE APPRAISE
Formulate a researchable question, find relevant articles,
and evaluate articles for suitability
Review of the health science
research process…
4. ASK: Formulate a focused
question
Patient / Problem / Population
Intervention
Comparison
Outcome
PICO is a mnemonic that helps one remember the key
components of a well focused question. The question needs to
identify the key problem of the patient, what treatment or tests
you are considering for the patient, what alternative treatment
or tests are being considered (if any) and what is the desired
outcome to promote or avoid.
5. Our PICO
A sedentary 82 year old woman living alone has been falling frequently. Her
doctor has referred her to PT to help strengthen her legs and improve her
balance.
Patient / Problem / Population – 82 year old white female who is falling
Intervention – physical therapy, movement exercises
Comparison – do nothing (modify home environment)
Outcome – prevent falls at all times of day
Can physical therapy interventions reduce falls in elderly patients?
6. Developing a search strategy
1. Frame the question – use PICO
2. Find background information – use
AccessMedicine or 5Minute Consult or…
3. Develop a search strategy using keywords and
phrases
4. Perform PubMed search, and refine search
terms as you retrieve results
5. Use the tools in the database to help with your
search!
6. Evaluate the results obtained, and further
refine if necessary
11. Critical Appraisal Learning
Outcomes
By the end of this section you should:
•Understand the principles of critical
appraisal and why you should undertake it
•Be able to appraise published research and judge
its reliability
•Be able to assess the relevance of published
research to your own work
12. What is Critical Appraisal?
‘Critical appraisal is the assessment of evidence by
systematically reviewing its relevance, validity and
results to specific situations’
Chambers, R (1998)
A balanced assessment of strengths of research against its
weaknesses. It is a skill that needs to be practiced!
13. Before we appraise medical
studies, let’s review levels of
evidence and study types
14. Dartmouth Biomedical Libraries: Resources.
http://www.dartmouth.edu/~biomed/resources.htmld/guides/ebm_resources.shtml.
Accessed April 29, 2016
Quality of evidence
15. Study Types Defined
meta-analysis: a quantitative approach in which individual study findings addressing a
common problem are statistically integrated and analyzed to determine the
effectiveness of interventions.
systematic review: a process by which a body of literature is reviewed and assessed
using systematic methods which are intended to reduce bias in the review process
and improve understandability.
randomized controlled trial: an experiment in which investigators randomly allocate
participants into (e.g. treatment and control) groups to receive or not to receive
one or more interventions that are being compared.
controlled clinical trial: any study which compares two groups by virtue of different
therapies or exposures.
cohort study: an observational study in which a cohort is followed over time.
case-control studies: retrospective research design that compares individuals with a
specific condition to those without it.
case report: a detailed report of the symptoms, signs, diagnosis, treatment, and
follow-up of an individual patient.
case series: a report on a series of patients with an outcome or condition of interest.
Susan Fowler, MLIS Washington University in St. Louis 2012
16. Levels of Evidence in
Medical Studies
Systematic
Reviews and Meta-
analyses
Randomised Controlled
Trials (RCTs)
Cohort Studies
Case Control Studies
17. Case-Control Studies
•Conducted after outcome has occurred
•Used mainly for causation studies
•Typically retrospective (looks back in time)
•Patient with outcome matched to control
•Investigations made into possible causes in both
patients
•May be only option in rare conditions
Example: Study used a matched design, matching infants
who had persistent pulmonary hypertension with infants
who did not have it, and compared the rates of exposure
to SSRIs.
18. Cohort Studies
• Two or more populations (cohorts) are followed
prospectively to see which risk factors are associated
with respect to disease or outcome
• One group has received an intervention or exposure
• Groups otherwise closely matched
• Groups followed over time
• Can be used for causation, diagnostic, harms and
therapeutic studies
Example: To determine the long-term effectiveness of influenza vaccines in elderly
people, cohorts of vaccinated elderly and unvaccinated community-dwelling elderly
were studied. The results suggest that the elderly who are vaccinated have a
reduced risk of hospitalization for pneumonia or influenza.
19. Randomized Controlled
Trials (RCT)
•Treatment group and ‘control’ group
•Random assignment to groups
•May involve ‘blinding’ of participants and
researchers
•Used for therapeutic or diagnostic interventions
•Some interventions unsuitable for RCTs
•Expensive
Example: This research studied the effect of raloxifene on fracture risk
in postmenopausal women, and found that the women who took
raloxifene over the same five year period of time as the women who did
not reduced their risk of clinical vertebrate fracture.
20. SystematicReviewsand
Meta-Analyses
•Combination of results of several RCTs or other types
of evidence
•Meta-analyses includes a statistical combination of
the results
•Considered to be highest-level evidence if conducted
properly
•Relies on enough RCTs being available
•Can include ‘Odds-Ratio’ diagrams
Example: Respiratory muscle training increases respiratory
muscle strength and reduces respiratory complications after
stroke: a systematic review.
21. Other Types of Clinical
Research
These are lesser forms of evidence, but for some
interventions, exposures or conditions they may be the only
form available
• Case studies / Case series - compares patients who have a
disease or outcome of interest (cases) with patients who
do not have the disease or outcome (controls), and looks
back retrospectively to compare how frequently the
exposure to a risk factor is present in each group to
determine the relationship between the risk factor and the
disease. These studies are designed to estimate odds.
• Cross-sectional surveys – Data collected once in a short
period of time
22. Quiz
What Type of clinical research is this?
1. Two groups of doctors, one group smokers, the
other non-smokers are followed over the course of
20 years to see whether which group are more
likely to develop lung cancer
24. Quiz
What Type of clinical research is
this?
2. Two groups of patients are studied, one
group given physiotherapy for low back pain,
the other given advice only. Patients are
randomly assigned to either group and
followed up after six months
26. Quiz
What Type of clinical research is this?
3. One hundred sets of twins, where one had
developed melanoma and the other had not,
were studied for possible causation factors
29. Critical Appraisalof MedicalResearch
•Balanced assessment of strengths of research
against its weaknesses
•Assessment of research process and results
•Consideration of quantitative and qualitative
aspects of research
•To be undertaken by all health professionals as
part of their work
30. Critical Appraisalis NOT:
• Negative dismissal of a piece of research
• Assessment of results alone
• Based entirely on detailed statistical
analysis
• To be undertaken by expert researchers
only
31. Why Should We Bother?
• Published research is not
always reliable or applicable
• Patients are informed by
the news and media
reporting the results of
scientific studies
Drinking more coffee may
stave off multiple
sclerosis!!
Gluten triggers
strange
delusions!
Low fat diet bad for your health
and cutting back on meat, dairy
and eggs a disastrous mistake!
33. Appraising medical literature
1. Is the study question relevant? Study should address an
important topic, add to what is already known and be
relevant to one’s work.
2. Does the study add anything new? Scientific research is
built upon previous research – subsequent studies should
extend research and enhance knowledge.
3. What type of research question is being asked? A well-
developed research question usually identifies three
components: the group or population of patients, the
studied parameter (e.g. a therapy or clinical intervention)
and the outcomes of interest. Typically questions address:
Effectiveness of Treatment or the Frequency of Events.
34. Appraising medical literature
4. Was the study design appropriate for the research
question? The research question determines the most
appropriate study design. Randomized Controlled Trials
(RCT) are the gold standard for intervention studies.
Cohort studies are common for diagnostic tests. There
are many different types of studies.
5. Did the study methods address the most important
potential sources of bias? Bias in this context does not
mean investigator bias, but rather bias attributed to
chance (e.g. a random error) or to the study methods
(systematic bias). Systematic biases arise from how
participants were selected, how data was collected, or
through the researchers' analysis or interpretation.
35. Appraising medical literature
6. Was the study performed according to the original
protocol? Deviations from the planned protocol can
affect the validity or relevance of a study – often
planned participation is lower than anticipated or drop-
outs occur.
7. Does the study test a stated hypothesis? A hypothesis
is a clear statement of what the investigators expect the
study to find and states the research question in a form
that can be tested and refuted
8. Were the statistical analyses performed correctly?
Difficult to ascertain; read the Methods section, and pay
attention to how missing data are treated. Ideally, this
section should be understandable to non-statisticians.
36. Appraising medical literature
9. Do the data justify the conclusions? Are the
conclusions that the authors present reasonable on the
basis of the accumulated data? Be wary of
generalizations and size of populations studied.
10. Are there any conflicts of interest? Personal factors,
including financial, career and outcome-based conflicts.
This is a judgement call on the part of the reader.
38. How to do Critical Appraisal
•Checklists are available that ask simple
questions
•There are different checklists for different
types of studies (systematic reviews, RCTs
etc)
•These checklists help you focus on the
most important aspects of the article
39. Key Steps in CriticalAppraisal
The checklists help us answer these questions
• What are the results? Are they significant?
• Are the results valid? How was the research
done?
• How will these results help me work with my
patients?
40. Diagnostic Research Studies
• PT Diagnosis process:
• Patient history
• Systems review
• Tests & measures
• Diagnostic tests have a range of values
• Should be compared to the Reference or Gold Standard test
• e.g. MRI compared to PT musculoskeletal test
• ‘Index test’ or ‘test of interest’ are the tests being investigated
41. Appraising Diagnostic Studies
• Appraising diagnostic literature
• Determining applicability – relevance of clinical population to your
patient
• Quality – Was there an independent, blind comparison with the gold
standard diagnostic tool? Were examiners unaware of results of gold
std test? Did all subject receive both tests?
• Results: Clinically useful statistics reported and interpreted?
• Sensitivity – clinical test’s accuracy in correctly identifying problem as
compared to gold standard.
• Specificity – test’s ability to correctly identify absence of problem (no
problem)
• Summarizing clinical bottom line of diagnostic study
• Is the test accurate and clinically relevant to PT practice?
• Will the results of this test (knowing it’s limitations) affect treatment plan
and help patient?
42. Sensitivity: clinical test’s accuracy in correctly
identifying a problem as established by the Gold
Standard.
Specificity: clinical test’s ability to correctly
identify the absence of a problem.
43. Intervention Studies
• The intervention (the preventative or therapeutic measure)
being tested is allocated by the investigator to a group of two
or more study populations
• Subjects are followed prospectively to compare the
intervention vs. the control (standard treatment, no treatment
or placebo)
• The main intervention study design is the randomized
controlled trial (RCT)
44.
45. Appraising Intervention
Studies
• Inclusion and exclusion criteria should be clearly defined AND
applicable
• Realistic interventions and controls
• Outcome measures relevant to the clinical question and
conducted realistically
• Appropriate random assignment of participants
• Bias minimized?
• Randomization
• Recruitment of participants
• Minimal dropout rate
• Masking or blinding of researchers, evaluators, participants,
therapists
46. p-value
The P value, or calculated probability, is the probability of finding
the observed, or more extreme, results when the null hypothesis (H
0) of a study question is true – the definition of 'extreme' depends
on how the hypothesis is being tested.
p-value < 0.05
Can state with 95% confidence that the result is not due to chance
Most authors refer to statistically significant as P < 0.05 and
statistically highly significant as P < 0.001 (less than one in a
thousand chance of being wrong).
47. Diagostic Study AppraisalRubric
Yes No ? Comments
1. Is the entire spectrum of patients
represented in the studysample?
2. Is my patient represented inthis
spectrum ofpatients?
3. Was there an independentblind
comparison with a reference
(gold) standard of diagnosis?
4. Do the authors provide evidence of the
“quality” of the gold standard?
5. Were the diagnostic tests performed
by one or more reliable examiners who
were masked to the results of the
reference (gold) test? (requires that
some level of evidence of the
qualifications of the examiners is
provided)
6. Did all subjects receive both (indexand
gold standard tests) regardless of test
outcomes?
7. Was there minimal time delay
between the administration of the index
tests and the "gold"standard?
48. Yes No ? Comments
8. Was the diagnostic test interpreted
independently of all clinical information?
9. Do the authors provide clinically useful
measures of the diagnostic test’s utility,
for instance likelihood ratios (patient
centered) to support the Sensitivity and
Specificity (test centered)?
10. Is the test accurate (when compared
to the Goldstandard)?
11. is the test clinically relevantto
physical therapy practice?
12. Will the resultingpost-test
probabilities affect my management and
help mypatient?
Summary Comments (take home
message):
danielcip3
2013-11-01 22:21:13
--------------------------------------------
Summary Comments (take home
message):
49. Additional sources of
Checklists
Critical appraisal checklists can be downloaded
from:
Critical Appraisal Skills Programme
www.casp-uk.net
Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine
www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1157
50. The Good News Is…
Some healthcare research has already been
appraised
Cochrane Library
(good quality systematic reviews conducted
by the Cochrane Collaboration)
Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects
(critical appraisals of published systematic reviews)