SlideShare a Scribd company logo
COMPUTER SIMULATION OF A HEAT
EXCHANGER USING ASPEN PLUS.
Presented by:
Ali Raza ( 2010-ch-82 )
M. Arsalan ( 2010-ch-120 )
PROBLEM STATEMENT
 Freon-12, at a flow rate of 10560 kg/hr, needs to
be heated from 240 K to 300 K. Ethylene glycol is
available at 350 K. A typical shell and tube heat
exchanger will be used. The plant manager
recommends that the minimum temperature
approach should be at least 10 K. He also
recommends using 20 BWG carbon-steel tubing
with a pressure drop not exceeding 10 psig (0.67
atm) for either the shell or tube side.
SCHEMATIC
PROCEDURE
 Open Aspen Plus User Interface.
 Run Blank Simulation.
 Go to the Heater Section, and Choose the Block
‘HeatX’.
 Our Hot Stream is ‘Glycol’.
 Cold Stream is ‘Freaon-12’.
 Draw the Diagram As Follows..
SPECIFY THE VALUES OF HOT AND COLD
STREAMS..
SPECIFICATION OF GEOMETRY
 Now Go to Blocks > setup > specification and
select the Detailed Method.
 Now Give the Values as Follows..
PRESSURE DROP
Now click on the Pressure drop tab at the top of
the page and a new input page will appear. Here,
you need to specify how Aspen will calculate the
pressure drop of the heat exchanger. We will have
Aspen calculate pressure drop from the geometry
of the heat exchanger. This option is shown at left
and is the preferred option.
Note*: Both the hot and cold side have to be
specified for the pressure drop calculations.
U METHODS
The input page for the overall heat transfer
coefficient appears next. (Shown at left) You need
to specify how Aspen will calculate the U-value for
the exchanger. There are several options explained
below. For this example, the U-value will be
calculated from “|Film coefficients.” This option will
require more input and that page will be shown
next.
CONT,..
 Constant U-value—Aspen uses a constant value in
calculations; the value is supplied by
 the user
 Phase specific values—Aspen will use default
values given for specific heat transfer
 situations (e.g. boiling liquids, liquid in shell to liquid in
tubes, condensation, etc.; these
 default values can also be changed by the user to apply
to new situations)
 Power law expression—Aspen uses a scaling factor
with a known overall H.T.
 coefficient and a known flow rate from a similar heat
transfer situation; the user must
 supply both values
CONT,..
 Exchanger geometry—Aspen calculates an
average U-value from the exchanger
 geometry using exchanger algorithms
 Film coefficients—the U-value is calculated
from individual heat transfer coefficients
 (ho, hi); Note*-more input is needed on another
page for this option
 User Subroutine—gives input pages so the user
can supply a FORTRAN algorithm for
 U calculations
FILM COEFFICIENTS
 Aspen will Automatically calculate film Coefficients
from Geometry. However you Can Also Specify the
Values of Film Coefficients.
HEAT EXCHANGER GEOMETRY INPUT
CALCULATIONS
 After the heat transfer coefficient calculations are
specified, the next step is to set out the geometry of
the heat exchanger. Since Aspen does not do every
calculation, hand computations will be needed. You,
the user, must supply the number of tube passes,
the shell diameter, the number of tubes, the length
of the tubes, the inside and outside diameters of the
tubes, the pitch, the material of the tubes, the
number of baffles and baffle spacing. Some of the
previous material is arbitrary and doesn’t really
need to be calculated. However, the heat transfer
area needs to be estimated, at least for the first
simulation run, in order to find the number of tubes
CONT,..
 . Area can be found by using the simple equation of A =
Q/ U DTLM. The heat duty ( Q ) was found by Aspen
and the log mean temperature can be easily calculated.
(Refer to reference five) To find the area, you need to
find a value for the overall heat transfer coefficient.
Refer to the literature for U-value estimates for the
situation in the example. (See references 3, 4, 5, and 6)
A typical value for our situation was around 150 W/m2 K
in Coulson and Richardson. This gave an area of
approximately 20 m2. The next step is to find the
number of tubes and shell diameter. Set the dimensions
of one tube by specifying the tube size and
length.Usually you should start with 1-inch pipe if the
fluid is a liquid and 1.5 inch pipe if the
fluid is a vapor. Since Freon-12 is in the liquid state
in this example, 1-inch tubes will be used. The
length is not important, but make it practical. (i.e.
the length should not be five miles! J A typical range
is 8-20 ft, 2-8 m) Once the dimensions of one pipe
are set, the number of tubes can easily be found by
dividing the total area by the area of one tube. The
shell diameter will be calculated based on the
number of tubes. One correlation given by Coulson
and Richardson is:
D(tube bundle) = O.D.*(Nt / k)^(1 / n)
Where O.D. is the outside diameter of one tube, Nt
is the number of tubes, and k and n are constants
dependent on the number of tube passes. Since
this example uses two tube passes: k = 0.249 and n
= 2.207. This calculation only gives the size of the
tube bundle and not the shell diameter. The shell
diameter is now found from adding the tube bundle
diameter and the clearance between the tube
bundle and the shell. The clearance space depends
on the exchanger type, but typically ranges from 10
mm to 90 mm. Refer to reference three or five for
clearance values.
TUBE DETAILS
 Select tube type—either bare or finned type tubes; generally, bare tubes
are used
 Total number—specify the total number of tubes
 Length—specify the total tube length, includes all passes
 Pattern—specify the tube layout, either triangular or square pitch,
generally, triangular
 pitch is used
 Pitch—enter in the distance between tube centers within the tube
bundle; generally, the
 pitch is 1.25 times the outside diameter of one tube
 Material—choose the material of the tubes; Aspen has many materials
to choose from or
 one can be provided by the user
 Conductivity—enter in the thermal conductivity of the material chosen.
Note* if this
 space is left empty, Aspen will use a default conductivity for the material from
its databanks
 Tube size—specify the inner and outer diameter of one tube
BAFFLES SPECIFICATION
RESULTS
EXCHANGER DETAILS
PRESSURE DROP/VELOCITIES RESULTS
DETAILED RESULTS
CHECKING THE GEOMETRY
Now to check if the geometry is accurate, the
simulation should be run with the calculations based on
the geometry. Return to the Setup input page for the
heat exchanger. Change the “Exchanger Specification”
to Geometry and rerun the simulation. Now the
calculations will be based on the area and layout of the
exchanger. Check the results, if they are not the same
as before, then the layout needs to be changed
accordingly. Granted, the results will not be exactly the
same since the area is 10% over designed. This will
cause more energy transfer between the two fluids; so
the outlet temperatures will be slightly different than the
design temperatures. The example results for the
geometry calculations are shown below. As you can see,
the outlet temperatures changed slightly, and the Freon
stream is starting to vaporize. However, the objectives of
the problem statement were still accomplished.
Computer Simulation of a Heat Exchanger using Aspen

More Related Content

What's hot

Module 3 - Basic Equipment
Module 3 - Basic EquipmentModule 3 - Basic Equipment
Module 3 - Basic Equipment
riezqaandika
 
Heat Exchanger - Design, Construction and Working
Heat Exchanger - Design, Construction and WorkingHeat Exchanger - Design, Construction and Working
Heat Exchanger - Design, Construction and Working
Abhishek Srivastav
 
Thermodynamic diagram
Thermodynamic diagramThermodynamic diagram
Thermodynamic diagram
Sunny Chauhan
 
Chemical reaction engineering
Chemical reaction engineeringChemical reaction engineering
Chemical reaction engineering
Pankaj Khandelwal
 
Simulating combined cycle gas turbine power plants in aspen hysys
Simulating combined cycle gas turbine power plants in aspen hysysSimulating combined cycle gas turbine power plants in aspen hysys
Simulating combined cycle gas turbine power plants in aspen hysys
YilberMndez
 
Aspen Plus - Bootcamp - 12 Case Studies (2 of 2) (Slideshare)
Aspen Plus - Bootcamp - 12 Case Studies (2 of 2) (Slideshare)Aspen Plus - Bootcamp - 12 Case Studies (2 of 2) (Slideshare)
Aspen Plus - Bootcamp - 12 Case Studies (2 of 2) (Slideshare)
Chemical Engineering Guy
 
Aspen Plus - Intermediate Process Modeling (3 of 3) (Slideshare)
Aspen Plus - Intermediate Process Modeling (3 of 3) (Slideshare)Aspen Plus - Intermediate Process Modeling (3 of 3) (Slideshare)
Aspen Plus - Intermediate Process Modeling (3 of 3) (Slideshare)
Chemical Engineering Guy
 
2.1 Material balances
2.1 Material balances2.1 Material balances
Space time and Space velocity, CSTR
Space time and Space velocity, CSTRSpace time and Space velocity, CSTR
Space time and Space velocity, CSTR
Mujeeb UR Rahman
 
Chilton Colburn Analogy - Overall Concept
Chilton Colburn Analogy - Overall ConceptChilton Colburn Analogy - Overall Concept
Chilton Colburn Analogy - Overall Concept
SyedHameedAnwarSahib
 
AIChE Smart Stack Damper Design Provides Better Control of Fired Heaters
AIChE Smart Stack Damper Design Provides Better Control of Fired HeatersAIChE Smart Stack Damper Design Provides Better Control of Fired Heaters
AIChE Smart Stack Damper Design Provides Better Control of Fired Heaters
Ashutosh Garg
 
Heat exchangers
Heat exchangersHeat exchangers
Heat exchangers
Leji Latheef
 
Basics of two phase flow (gas-liquid) line sizing
Basics of two phase flow (gas-liquid) line sizingBasics of two phase flow (gas-liquid) line sizing
Basics of two phase flow (gas-liquid) line sizing
Vikram Sharma
 
Using aspen plus for process simulation.pptx
Using aspen plus for process simulation.pptxUsing aspen plus for process simulation.pptx
Using aspen plus for process simulation.pptx
FsehaGebremichaelGeb1
 
Centrifugal Compressors
Centrifugal CompressorsCentrifugal Compressors
Centrifugal Compressors
Gerard B. Hawkins
 
Shell and tube heat exchanger
Shell and tube heat exchangerShell and tube heat exchanger
Shell and tube heat exchanger
Paul singh
 
Estimation of Pressure Drop in Pipe Systems
Estimation of Pressure Drop in Pipe SystemsEstimation of Pressure Drop in Pipe Systems
Estimation of Pressure Drop in Pipe Systems
Gerard B. Hawkins
 
Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design
Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger DesignFundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design
Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design
Addisu Dagne Zegeye
 
Design of heat exchanger
Design of heat exchangerDesign of heat exchanger
Design of heat exchanger
Rana Abdul Rauf
 

What's hot (20)

Module 3 - Basic Equipment
Module 3 - Basic EquipmentModule 3 - Basic Equipment
Module 3 - Basic Equipment
 
Design of condenser
Design of condenserDesign of condenser
Design of condenser
 
Heat Exchanger - Design, Construction and Working
Heat Exchanger - Design, Construction and WorkingHeat Exchanger - Design, Construction and Working
Heat Exchanger - Design, Construction and Working
 
Thermodynamic diagram
Thermodynamic diagramThermodynamic diagram
Thermodynamic diagram
 
Chemical reaction engineering
Chemical reaction engineeringChemical reaction engineering
Chemical reaction engineering
 
Simulating combined cycle gas turbine power plants in aspen hysys
Simulating combined cycle gas turbine power plants in aspen hysysSimulating combined cycle gas turbine power plants in aspen hysys
Simulating combined cycle gas turbine power plants in aspen hysys
 
Aspen Plus - Bootcamp - 12 Case Studies (2 of 2) (Slideshare)
Aspen Plus - Bootcamp - 12 Case Studies (2 of 2) (Slideshare)Aspen Plus - Bootcamp - 12 Case Studies (2 of 2) (Slideshare)
Aspen Plus - Bootcamp - 12 Case Studies (2 of 2) (Slideshare)
 
Aspen Plus - Intermediate Process Modeling (3 of 3) (Slideshare)
Aspen Plus - Intermediate Process Modeling (3 of 3) (Slideshare)Aspen Plus - Intermediate Process Modeling (3 of 3) (Slideshare)
Aspen Plus - Intermediate Process Modeling (3 of 3) (Slideshare)
 
2.1 Material balances
2.1 Material balances2.1 Material balances
2.1 Material balances
 
Space time and Space velocity, CSTR
Space time and Space velocity, CSTRSpace time and Space velocity, CSTR
Space time and Space velocity, CSTR
 
Chilton Colburn Analogy - Overall Concept
Chilton Colburn Analogy - Overall ConceptChilton Colburn Analogy - Overall Concept
Chilton Colburn Analogy - Overall Concept
 
AIChE Smart Stack Damper Design Provides Better Control of Fired Heaters
AIChE Smart Stack Damper Design Provides Better Control of Fired HeatersAIChE Smart Stack Damper Design Provides Better Control of Fired Heaters
AIChE Smart Stack Damper Design Provides Better Control of Fired Heaters
 
Heat exchangers
Heat exchangersHeat exchangers
Heat exchangers
 
Basics of two phase flow (gas-liquid) line sizing
Basics of two phase flow (gas-liquid) line sizingBasics of two phase flow (gas-liquid) line sizing
Basics of two phase flow (gas-liquid) line sizing
 
Using aspen plus for process simulation.pptx
Using aspen plus for process simulation.pptxUsing aspen plus for process simulation.pptx
Using aspen plus for process simulation.pptx
 
Centrifugal Compressors
Centrifugal CompressorsCentrifugal Compressors
Centrifugal Compressors
 
Shell and tube heat exchanger
Shell and tube heat exchangerShell and tube heat exchanger
Shell and tube heat exchanger
 
Estimation of Pressure Drop in Pipe Systems
Estimation of Pressure Drop in Pipe SystemsEstimation of Pressure Drop in Pipe Systems
Estimation of Pressure Drop in Pipe Systems
 
Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design
Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger DesignFundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design
Fundamentals of Heat Exchanger Design
 
Design of heat exchanger
Design of heat exchangerDesign of heat exchanger
Design of heat exchanger
 

Viewers also liked

Simulation results of induction heating coil
Simulation results of induction heating coilSimulation results of induction heating coil
Simulation results of induction heating coil
Minh Anh Nguyen
 
11-8182-CS-Petrofac-FINAL
11-8182-CS-Petrofac-FINAL11-8182-CS-Petrofac-FINAL
11-8182-CS-Petrofac-FINALShelby Hegy
 
Control loop configuration of interacting units
Control loop configuration of interacting unitsControl loop configuration of interacting units
Control loop configuration of interacting units
Somen Jana
 
Simulation of One Dimensional Heat Transfer
Simulation of One Dimensional Heat TransferSimulation of One Dimensional Heat Transfer
Simulation of One Dimensional Heat Transfer
P.G.Keerthana Gopalakrishnan
 
Modeling separation systems_with_aspen_plus
Modeling separation systems_with_aspen_plusModeling separation systems_with_aspen_plus
Modeling separation systems_with_aspen_plus
Tecna
 
Aluminium Corrosion Alodine Protective Coating
Aluminium Corrosion Alodine Protective CoatingAluminium Corrosion Alodine Protective Coating
Aluminium Corrosion Alodine Protective Coating
FernandoVicente25
 
Phoenix park presentation slides
Phoenix park presentation slidesPhoenix park presentation slides
Phoenix park presentation slidesaalmarques
 
Phoenix park gas processors ltd presentation
Phoenix park gas processors ltd presentationPhoenix park gas processors ltd presentation
Phoenix park gas processors ltd presentation
Veno Seebaran
 
Robust state and fault estimation observer for discrete-time D-LPV systems wi...
Robust state and fault estimation observer for discrete-time D-LPV systems wi...Robust state and fault estimation observer for discrete-time D-LPV systems wi...
Robust state and fault estimation observer for discrete-time D-LPV systems wi...
Francisco Ronay López Estrada
 
Sugarcane industry
Sugarcane industrySugarcane industry
Sugarcane industryRt Vinay
 
Selection of amine solvents for CO2 capture from natural gas power plant
Selection of amine solvents for CO2 capture from natural gas power plantSelection of amine solvents for CO2 capture from natural gas power plant
Selection of amine solvents for CO2 capture from natural gas power plant
UK Carbon Capture and Storage Research Centre
 
Process simulation of urea plant
Process simulation of urea plantProcess simulation of urea plant
Process simulation of urea plant
Gajanan Hange
 
Aspen Tivoli Brief from IBM
Aspen Tivoli Brief from IBMAspen Tivoli Brief from IBM
Aspen Tivoli Brief from IBMStewart Booden
 
Process Simulation of Urea Plant
Process Simulation of Urea PlantProcess Simulation of Urea Plant
Process Simulation of Urea PlantRahul Ghalme
 
Presntation co2 and mea
Presntation co2 and meaPresntation co2 and mea
Presntation co2 and mea
HASSAN SALEM
 
Crude Oil Fractional Distillation
Crude Oil Fractional DistillationCrude Oil Fractional Distillation
Crude Oil Fractional Distillation
Eric HAGENIMANA
 
Introduction to free and open source Chemical Process Simulators - (DWSIM & C...
Introduction to free and open source Chemical Process Simulators - (DWSIM & C...Introduction to free and open source Chemical Process Simulators - (DWSIM & C...
Introduction to free and open source Chemical Process Simulators - (DWSIM & C...
CAChemE
 
The Use of Finite Element Modeling in Thermal Packaging Design
The Use of Finite Element Modeling in Thermal Packaging DesignThe Use of Finite Element Modeling in Thermal Packaging Design
The Use of Finite Element Modeling in Thermal Packaging DesignCryopak
 

Viewers also liked (18)

Simulation results of induction heating coil
Simulation results of induction heating coilSimulation results of induction heating coil
Simulation results of induction heating coil
 
11-8182-CS-Petrofac-FINAL
11-8182-CS-Petrofac-FINAL11-8182-CS-Petrofac-FINAL
11-8182-CS-Petrofac-FINAL
 
Control loop configuration of interacting units
Control loop configuration of interacting unitsControl loop configuration of interacting units
Control loop configuration of interacting units
 
Simulation of One Dimensional Heat Transfer
Simulation of One Dimensional Heat TransferSimulation of One Dimensional Heat Transfer
Simulation of One Dimensional Heat Transfer
 
Modeling separation systems_with_aspen_plus
Modeling separation systems_with_aspen_plusModeling separation systems_with_aspen_plus
Modeling separation systems_with_aspen_plus
 
Aluminium Corrosion Alodine Protective Coating
Aluminium Corrosion Alodine Protective CoatingAluminium Corrosion Alodine Protective Coating
Aluminium Corrosion Alodine Protective Coating
 
Phoenix park presentation slides
Phoenix park presentation slidesPhoenix park presentation slides
Phoenix park presentation slides
 
Phoenix park gas processors ltd presentation
Phoenix park gas processors ltd presentationPhoenix park gas processors ltd presentation
Phoenix park gas processors ltd presentation
 
Robust state and fault estimation observer for discrete-time D-LPV systems wi...
Robust state and fault estimation observer for discrete-time D-LPV systems wi...Robust state and fault estimation observer for discrete-time D-LPV systems wi...
Robust state and fault estimation observer for discrete-time D-LPV systems wi...
 
Sugarcane industry
Sugarcane industrySugarcane industry
Sugarcane industry
 
Selection of amine solvents for CO2 capture from natural gas power plant
Selection of amine solvents for CO2 capture from natural gas power plantSelection of amine solvents for CO2 capture from natural gas power plant
Selection of amine solvents for CO2 capture from natural gas power plant
 
Process simulation of urea plant
Process simulation of urea plantProcess simulation of urea plant
Process simulation of urea plant
 
Aspen Tivoli Brief from IBM
Aspen Tivoli Brief from IBMAspen Tivoli Brief from IBM
Aspen Tivoli Brief from IBM
 
Process Simulation of Urea Plant
Process Simulation of Urea PlantProcess Simulation of Urea Plant
Process Simulation of Urea Plant
 
Presntation co2 and mea
Presntation co2 and meaPresntation co2 and mea
Presntation co2 and mea
 
Crude Oil Fractional Distillation
Crude Oil Fractional DistillationCrude Oil Fractional Distillation
Crude Oil Fractional Distillation
 
Introduction to free and open source Chemical Process Simulators - (DWSIM & C...
Introduction to free and open source Chemical Process Simulators - (DWSIM & C...Introduction to free and open source Chemical Process Simulators - (DWSIM & C...
Introduction to free and open source Chemical Process Simulators - (DWSIM & C...
 
The Use of Finite Element Modeling in Thermal Packaging Design
The Use of Finite Element Modeling in Thermal Packaging DesignThe Use of Finite Element Modeling in Thermal Packaging Design
The Use of Finite Element Modeling in Thermal Packaging Design
 

Similar to Computer Simulation of a Heat Exchanger using Aspen

Tagliatela College of EngineeringEASC1112 – Methods of Engineeri.docx
Tagliatela College of EngineeringEASC1112 – Methods of Engineeri.docxTagliatela College of EngineeringEASC1112 – Methods of Engineeri.docx
Tagliatela College of EngineeringEASC1112 – Methods of Engineeri.docx
ssuserf9c51d
 
Heat pipe with fins thermal analysis
Heat pipe with fins thermal analysisHeat pipe with fins thermal analysis
Heat pipe with fins thermal analysis
Daniel Leon
 
Cfd Simulation and Experimentalverification of Air Flow through Heated Pipe
Cfd Simulation and Experimentalverification of Air Flow through Heated PipeCfd Simulation and Experimentalverification of Air Flow through Heated Pipe
Cfd Simulation and Experimentalverification of Air Flow through Heated Pipe
IOSR Journals
 
Design & CFD Analysis of Heat Exchanger
Design & CFD Analysis of Heat ExchangerDesign & CFD Analysis of Heat Exchanger
Design & CFD Analysis of Heat Exchanger
CPDLR
 
Design plate heat exchangers
Design plate heat exchangersDesign plate heat exchangers
Design plate heat exchangers
Xuan Tung
 
Plate and frame Heat Exchanger Sizing
Plate and frame Heat Exchanger SizingPlate and frame Heat Exchanger Sizing
Plate and frame Heat Exchanger Sizing
Syed Waqas Haider
 
Cep plate and_frame_hx
Cep plate and_frame_hxCep plate and_frame_hx
Cep plate and_frame_hx
Hsien Yu Wang
 
Shell & tube heat exchanger single fluid flow heat transfer
Shell & tube heat exchanger single fluid flow heat transferShell & tube heat exchanger single fluid flow heat transfer
Shell & tube heat exchanger single fluid flow heat transfer
Vikram Sharma
 
Comparison of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger using Theoretical Methods, HTRI, ...
Comparison of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger using Theoretical Methods, HTRI, ...Comparison of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger using Theoretical Methods, HTRI, ...
Comparison of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger using Theoretical Methods, HTRI, ...
IJERA Editor
 
Heat exchanger 3-STHE manual calculation
Heat exchanger 3-STHE manual calculationHeat exchanger 3-STHE manual calculation
Heat exchanger 3-STHE manual calculation
Akshay Sarita
 
Final reportr1
Final reportr1Final reportr1
Final reportr1
cwarner7_11
 
types of heat exchangers.pdf
types of heat exchangers.pdftypes of heat exchangers.pdf
types of heat exchangers.pdf
hassanzain10
 
A05v24n4
A05v24n4A05v24n4
A05v24n4
y1r2m
 
Analysis of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger With Helical Fins
Analysis of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger With Helical FinsAnalysis of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger With Helical Fins
Analysis of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger With Helical Fins
IRJET Journal
 
IRJET- Multi-Objective Optimization of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger – A Case...
IRJET- Multi-Objective Optimization of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger – A Case...IRJET- Multi-Objective Optimization of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger – A Case...
IRJET- Multi-Objective Optimization of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger – A Case...
IRJET Journal
 
CFD Analysis of a Double Pipe Heat Exchanger by using Fluid Based Nanomaterials
CFD Analysis of a Double Pipe Heat Exchanger by using Fluid Based NanomaterialsCFD Analysis of a Double Pipe Heat Exchanger by using Fluid Based Nanomaterials
CFD Analysis of a Double Pipe Heat Exchanger by using Fluid Based Nanomaterials
ijtsrd
 
Design and analysis of plate heat exchanger with co2 and r134a as working f
Design and analysis of plate heat exchanger with co2 and r134a as working fDesign and analysis of plate heat exchanger with co2 and r134a as working f
Design and analysis of plate heat exchanger with co2 and r134a as working fIAEME Publication
 

Similar to Computer Simulation of a Heat Exchanger using Aspen (20)

Tagliatela College of EngineeringEASC1112 – Methods of Engineeri.docx
Tagliatela College of EngineeringEASC1112 – Methods of Engineeri.docxTagliatela College of EngineeringEASC1112 – Methods of Engineeri.docx
Tagliatela College of EngineeringEASC1112 – Methods of Engineeri.docx
 
Heat pipe with fins thermal analysis
Heat pipe with fins thermal analysisHeat pipe with fins thermal analysis
Heat pipe with fins thermal analysis
 
Cfd Simulation and Experimentalverification of Air Flow through Heated Pipe
Cfd Simulation and Experimentalverification of Air Flow through Heated PipeCfd Simulation and Experimentalverification of Air Flow through Heated Pipe
Cfd Simulation and Experimentalverification of Air Flow through Heated Pipe
 
Design & CFD Analysis of Heat Exchanger
Design & CFD Analysis of Heat ExchangerDesign & CFD Analysis of Heat Exchanger
Design & CFD Analysis of Heat Exchanger
 
Design plate heat exchangers
Design plate heat exchangersDesign plate heat exchangers
Design plate heat exchangers
 
Plate and frame Heat Exchanger Sizing
Plate and frame Heat Exchanger SizingPlate and frame Heat Exchanger Sizing
Plate and frame Heat Exchanger Sizing
 
Cep plate and_frame_hx
Cep plate and_frame_hxCep plate and_frame_hx
Cep plate and_frame_hx
 
Shell & tube heat exchanger single fluid flow heat transfer
Shell & tube heat exchanger single fluid flow heat transferShell & tube heat exchanger single fluid flow heat transfer
Shell & tube heat exchanger single fluid flow heat transfer
 
Comparison of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger using Theoretical Methods, HTRI, ...
Comparison of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger using Theoretical Methods, HTRI, ...Comparison of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger using Theoretical Methods, HTRI, ...
Comparison of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger using Theoretical Methods, HTRI, ...
 
Heat exchanger 3-STHE manual calculation
Heat exchanger 3-STHE manual calculationHeat exchanger 3-STHE manual calculation
Heat exchanger 3-STHE manual calculation
 
Final reportr1
Final reportr1Final reportr1
Final reportr1
 
types of heat exchangers.pdf
types of heat exchangers.pdftypes of heat exchangers.pdf
types of heat exchangers.pdf
 
A05v24n4
A05v24n4A05v24n4
A05v24n4
 
REPORT-MSD
REPORT-MSDREPORT-MSD
REPORT-MSD
 
Analysis of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger With Helical Fins
Analysis of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger With Helical FinsAnalysis of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger With Helical Fins
Analysis of Double Pipe Heat Exchanger With Helical Fins
 
IRJET- Multi-Objective Optimization of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger – A Case...
IRJET- Multi-Objective Optimization of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger – A Case...IRJET- Multi-Objective Optimization of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger – A Case...
IRJET- Multi-Objective Optimization of Shell and Tube Heat Exchanger – A Case...
 
274 iitb 274 corrected
274 iitb 274 corrected274 iitb 274 corrected
274 iitb 274 corrected
 
CFD Analysis of a Double Pipe Heat Exchanger by using Fluid Based Nanomaterials
CFD Analysis of a Double Pipe Heat Exchanger by using Fluid Based NanomaterialsCFD Analysis of a Double Pipe Heat Exchanger by using Fluid Based Nanomaterials
CFD Analysis of a Double Pipe Heat Exchanger by using Fluid Based Nanomaterials
 
Portfolio Po-Chun Kang
Portfolio Po-Chun KangPortfolio Po-Chun Kang
Portfolio Po-Chun Kang
 
Design and analysis of plate heat exchanger with co2 and r134a as working f
Design and analysis of plate heat exchanger with co2 and r134a as working fDesign and analysis of plate heat exchanger with co2 and r134a as working f
Design and analysis of plate heat exchanger with co2 and r134a as working f
 

Computer Simulation of a Heat Exchanger using Aspen

  • 1. COMPUTER SIMULATION OF A HEAT EXCHANGER USING ASPEN PLUS. Presented by: Ali Raza ( 2010-ch-82 ) M. Arsalan ( 2010-ch-120 )
  • 2. PROBLEM STATEMENT  Freon-12, at a flow rate of 10560 kg/hr, needs to be heated from 240 K to 300 K. Ethylene glycol is available at 350 K. A typical shell and tube heat exchanger will be used. The plant manager recommends that the minimum temperature approach should be at least 10 K. He also recommends using 20 BWG carbon-steel tubing with a pressure drop not exceeding 10 psig (0.67 atm) for either the shell or tube side.
  • 4. PROCEDURE  Open Aspen Plus User Interface.  Run Blank Simulation.  Go to the Heater Section, and Choose the Block ‘HeatX’.  Our Hot Stream is ‘Glycol’.  Cold Stream is ‘Freaon-12’.  Draw the Diagram As Follows..
  • 5. SPECIFY THE VALUES OF HOT AND COLD STREAMS..
  • 6.
  • 7.
  • 8. SPECIFICATION OF GEOMETRY  Now Go to Blocks > setup > specification and select the Detailed Method.  Now Give the Values as Follows..
  • 9.
  • 10. PRESSURE DROP Now click on the Pressure drop tab at the top of the page and a new input page will appear. Here, you need to specify how Aspen will calculate the pressure drop of the heat exchanger. We will have Aspen calculate pressure drop from the geometry of the heat exchanger. This option is shown at left and is the preferred option. Note*: Both the hot and cold side have to be specified for the pressure drop calculations.
  • 11.
  • 12. U METHODS The input page for the overall heat transfer coefficient appears next. (Shown at left) You need to specify how Aspen will calculate the U-value for the exchanger. There are several options explained below. For this example, the U-value will be calculated from “|Film coefficients.” This option will require more input and that page will be shown next.
  • 13.
  • 14. CONT,..  Constant U-value—Aspen uses a constant value in calculations; the value is supplied by  the user  Phase specific values—Aspen will use default values given for specific heat transfer  situations (e.g. boiling liquids, liquid in shell to liquid in tubes, condensation, etc.; these  default values can also be changed by the user to apply to new situations)  Power law expression—Aspen uses a scaling factor with a known overall H.T.  coefficient and a known flow rate from a similar heat transfer situation; the user must  supply both values
  • 15. CONT,..  Exchanger geometry—Aspen calculates an average U-value from the exchanger  geometry using exchanger algorithms  Film coefficients—the U-value is calculated from individual heat transfer coefficients  (ho, hi); Note*-more input is needed on another page for this option  User Subroutine—gives input pages so the user can supply a FORTRAN algorithm for  U calculations
  • 16. FILM COEFFICIENTS  Aspen will Automatically calculate film Coefficients from Geometry. However you Can Also Specify the Values of Film Coefficients.
  • 17. HEAT EXCHANGER GEOMETRY INPUT CALCULATIONS  After the heat transfer coefficient calculations are specified, the next step is to set out the geometry of the heat exchanger. Since Aspen does not do every calculation, hand computations will be needed. You, the user, must supply the number of tube passes, the shell diameter, the number of tubes, the length of the tubes, the inside and outside diameters of the tubes, the pitch, the material of the tubes, the number of baffles and baffle spacing. Some of the previous material is arbitrary and doesn’t really need to be calculated. However, the heat transfer area needs to be estimated, at least for the first simulation run, in order to find the number of tubes
  • 18. CONT,..  . Area can be found by using the simple equation of A = Q/ U DTLM. The heat duty ( Q ) was found by Aspen and the log mean temperature can be easily calculated. (Refer to reference five) To find the area, you need to find a value for the overall heat transfer coefficient. Refer to the literature for U-value estimates for the situation in the example. (See references 3, 4, 5, and 6) A typical value for our situation was around 150 W/m2 K in Coulson and Richardson. This gave an area of approximately 20 m2. The next step is to find the number of tubes and shell diameter. Set the dimensions of one tube by specifying the tube size and length.Usually you should start with 1-inch pipe if the fluid is a liquid and 1.5 inch pipe if the
  • 19. fluid is a vapor. Since Freon-12 is in the liquid state in this example, 1-inch tubes will be used. The length is not important, but make it practical. (i.e. the length should not be five miles! J A typical range is 8-20 ft, 2-8 m) Once the dimensions of one pipe are set, the number of tubes can easily be found by dividing the total area by the area of one tube. The shell diameter will be calculated based on the number of tubes. One correlation given by Coulson and Richardson is:
  • 20. D(tube bundle) = O.D.*(Nt / k)^(1 / n) Where O.D. is the outside diameter of one tube, Nt is the number of tubes, and k and n are constants dependent on the number of tube passes. Since this example uses two tube passes: k = 0.249 and n = 2.207. This calculation only gives the size of the tube bundle and not the shell diameter. The shell diameter is now found from adding the tube bundle diameter and the clearance between the tube bundle and the shell. The clearance space depends on the exchanger type, but typically ranges from 10 mm to 90 mm. Refer to reference three or five for clearance values.
  • 21.
  • 22.
  • 23. TUBE DETAILS  Select tube type—either bare or finned type tubes; generally, bare tubes are used  Total number—specify the total number of tubes  Length—specify the total tube length, includes all passes  Pattern—specify the tube layout, either triangular or square pitch, generally, triangular  pitch is used  Pitch—enter in the distance between tube centers within the tube bundle; generally, the  pitch is 1.25 times the outside diameter of one tube  Material—choose the material of the tubes; Aspen has many materials to choose from or  one can be provided by the user  Conductivity—enter in the thermal conductivity of the material chosen. Note* if this  space is left empty, Aspen will use a default conductivity for the material from its databanks  Tube size—specify the inner and outer diameter of one tube
  • 25.
  • 30. CHECKING THE GEOMETRY Now to check if the geometry is accurate, the simulation should be run with the calculations based on the geometry. Return to the Setup input page for the heat exchanger. Change the “Exchanger Specification” to Geometry and rerun the simulation. Now the calculations will be based on the area and layout of the exchanger. Check the results, if they are not the same as before, then the layout needs to be changed accordingly. Granted, the results will not be exactly the same since the area is 10% over designed. This will cause more energy transfer between the two fluids; so the outlet temperatures will be slightly different than the design temperatures. The example results for the geometry calculations are shown below. As you can see, the outlet temperatures changed slightly, and the Freon stream is starting to vaporize. However, the objectives of the problem statement were still accomplished.