RPA2 – Pressure Management RPA 2 Pressure Management University of Leicester WP 2.1 Redesign of press. schemes Exeter WP 2.2 Feedback control schemes Leic./De Mont. WP 2.3 Control Algorithms Leic./De Mont WP 2.4 Supervisory control scheme Leic./De Mont. WP 2.5 Integration of Pump Control De Montfort WP 2.6 Leakage & Burst Monitoring Leic./De Mont . DELIVERABLES
(Re)Design of Pressure Control Schemes RPA2 Work Package 2.1 Haytham Awad
Outline The net benefit cost model for pressure (re)zoning The optimisation algorithm for automated (re)zoning  Demonstration off the above on the case study Objective Develop a methodology and software to define optimal zones for pressure management
Net benefit cost model Evaluating benefits and costs assuming the use of PRVs Developed as a standalone methodology using a GUI dialog Used for the optimisation algorithm that will automate the process of selecting, locating and setting up PRVs The methodology addresses benefits and costs arsing from: Reduced water leakage Reduced pipe burst frequency Reduced pressure-sensitive demand Reduced energy consumed Reduced active leakage control effort Reduced frequency of customer contacts Installation/operation of PRVs
GUI dialog
Output report Net Benefits & Benefit/Cost ratios using: Fixed setting PRVs Time-modulated PRVs (two/four switching periods) Flow-modulated PRVs Pressure at critical point for different schemes Total Head upstream and downstream the PRV location
Implementation 4 DMAs analysed (E020, E023, E025, and E204) Importance of the estimation of different pressure management related benefits and costs in addition to the conventional ones This seems to apply particularly to the net benefits associated with: burst frequency reduction pressure-sensitive demand reduction and  customer contacts reduction
(Re)zoning algorithm Objective: m aximise total net benefit De cision variables:  Locations and settings of PRVs introduced to form pressure zones PRV X X X X Closed valve
(Re)zoning algorithm
33 Tree - 13 Connected - 37 Closed Example
Optimal steady state pressure control Hossam AbdelMeguid
Content Aim Recent technical developments Practical impact Deliverables and future work
Aim Develop theory and software and solve case studies for optimal steady state pressure control in the form of  time schedules flow modulation curves
Recent technical developments  Modification of the algorithm to include boundary and internal PRVs Implementation of GUI to pressure control module (PCM) Solution of the case studies E067 and E093 Isolation of the PCM from FINESSE and connection to PIGM Boundary PRV Boundary PRV Internal PRV
Technical developments
Technical developments
Command-line FINESSETools  E067.pcm   Technical developments   All other applications Read / write 800xA PGIM Read / write HDA / DA FINESSE modules,  e.g Pressure Control, Pump Scheduling, Demand Prediction OPC clinet tool
YWS case-studies DMA E067-Waterside case study,  leakage reduced by 30% DMA E093-Barrowby case study, leakage reduced by 45%
Practical applications and impact Leakage management and cost analysis  Calculation of optimal time schedules for PRVs Calculation of optimal flow modulation curves for PRVs Used by supervisory pressure control system Embedded into decision support software Deliverables and future work D2.3 -  Pressure control case studies, reports Future work – case studies for A016-HP and J712-HP DMAs equipped with Aquai-Mod controllers
Dynamic pressure control Bogumil Ulanicki
Aim Develop theory and software for robust dynamic pressure control  for application in: electronic controllers hydraulic controllers
NEPTUNE Workshop  Esholt Hall, 9th July 2008   PID controller uses only pressure measurements   Previous work
NEPTUNE Workshop  Esholt Hall, 9th July 2008   Modified controller uses information about both the outlet pressure and the valve flow.  Recent technical developments
Proposing a new controller Performing simulation studies using Matlab/Simulink NEPTUNE Workshop  Esholt Hall, 9th July 2008   Recent technical developments
Simulation result of pressure tracking with a linear flow modulation curve NEPTUNE Workshop  Esholt Hall, 9th July 2008   Recent technical developments
Shows potential performance of electronic controllers Some ideas can be transferred to a hydraulic controller Reference point to compare the dynamic performance of the hydraulic controllers, e.g. Aquai-Mod controller Deliverables and future work D2.3 - Pressure control case studies, reports Future work – case studies for A016-HP and J712-HP DMAs equipped with Aquai-Mod controllers  Generalisation of the controller algorithm for DMAs with many inlets NEPTUNE Workshop  Esholt Hall, 9th July 2008   Practical applications and impact
Test  rig experiments on Aquai-Mod controller Piotr Skworcow, Hossam AbdelMeguid (DMU) David Hurley, Mark Lock (Aquavent)
Aims Test Aquai-Mod controller in a test rig and field conditions  Derive and calibrate a mathematical model of the controller Compare the performance of the hydraulic controller against the electronic controller through simulations
Recent technical developments  Purchase and installation of the monitoring equipment: pressure transmitters, LVDT, flow meter, data acquisition card, LabView software, etc. Derivation of a mathematical model of the controller  Carrying out test sessions
Mathematical model  Understanding the valve operations General equations  Parameter values derived from the controller dimensions Parameter values derived from measurements Model validation from dynamic measurements
Test set-up
 
Preliminary measurement results The measured flow modulation curve
Practical applications and impact Understanding  steady-state and dynamic properties of the controller  Benchmarking against standard pilot valve; assessing its value as a replacement for the traditional pilot valve Suggesting potential improvements to the controller Deliverables and future work D2.4 -  Report on the test results Finishing the measurements, calibration of the model
Combined energy and pressure management Hossam AbdelMeguid, Peter Bounds,  Piotr Skworcow , Bogumil Ulanicki
Purpose Proposed solution Software implementation Case study Conclusions Outline
Purpose Minimize cost of water treatment and pumps energy usage whilst supplying good service to customers without unnecessarily high pressure  Integration and co-ordination of pump control in grid with pressure control of DMAs Pump  scheduling Pressure control Combined energy and pressure management Calculate time schedules for treatment works, pumps, valves, reservoirs and PRV setpoints
Proposed Solution Formulate as optimisation problem; cost function:  Total cost of water treatment and pumps energy use Inclusion of PRV model – setpoint as decision variable Network model with pressure dependent leakage: Excessive Pumping High energy cost High pressure Increased leakage More water from sources and to be pumped £ £ £
Implementation Embedded into the FINESSE software
Case Study 1 Harrogate  (Yorkshire Water): 10621 Nodes 11293 Pipes 14 PS 6 Reservoirs 243 Valves Total Demand: 400 l/s
Case Study 2 Oldham (United Utilities):  3 WTW 10 Reservoirs 11 PS 80 DMA 3 Ind. Users 4m kWh £280k
Conclusions Minimize cost of water treatment and pumps energy usage whilst supplying good service to customers without unnecessarily high pressure Combined energy and pressure management Formulation as optimisation problem with network model with pressure dependent leakage Solver embedded into FINESSE software Cases to be solved: Harrogate (Yorkshire), Oldham (UU)

Combinated energy presure

  • 1.
    RPA2 – PressureManagement RPA 2 Pressure Management University of Leicester WP 2.1 Redesign of press. schemes Exeter WP 2.2 Feedback control schemes Leic./De Mont. WP 2.3 Control Algorithms Leic./De Mont WP 2.4 Supervisory control scheme Leic./De Mont. WP 2.5 Integration of Pump Control De Montfort WP 2.6 Leakage & Burst Monitoring Leic./De Mont . DELIVERABLES
  • 2.
    (Re)Design of PressureControl Schemes RPA2 Work Package 2.1 Haytham Awad
  • 3.
    Outline The netbenefit cost model for pressure (re)zoning The optimisation algorithm for automated (re)zoning Demonstration off the above on the case study Objective Develop a methodology and software to define optimal zones for pressure management
  • 4.
    Net benefit costmodel Evaluating benefits and costs assuming the use of PRVs Developed as a standalone methodology using a GUI dialog Used for the optimisation algorithm that will automate the process of selecting, locating and setting up PRVs The methodology addresses benefits and costs arsing from: Reduced water leakage Reduced pipe burst frequency Reduced pressure-sensitive demand Reduced energy consumed Reduced active leakage control effort Reduced frequency of customer contacts Installation/operation of PRVs
  • 5.
  • 6.
    Output report NetBenefits & Benefit/Cost ratios using: Fixed setting PRVs Time-modulated PRVs (two/four switching periods) Flow-modulated PRVs Pressure at critical point for different schemes Total Head upstream and downstream the PRV location
  • 7.
    Implementation 4 DMAsanalysed (E020, E023, E025, and E204) Importance of the estimation of different pressure management related benefits and costs in addition to the conventional ones This seems to apply particularly to the net benefits associated with: burst frequency reduction pressure-sensitive demand reduction and customer contacts reduction
  • 8.
    (Re)zoning algorithm Objective:m aximise total net benefit De cision variables: Locations and settings of PRVs introduced to form pressure zones PRV X X X X Closed valve
  • 9.
  • 10.
    33 Tree -13 Connected - 37 Closed Example
  • 11.
    Optimal steady statepressure control Hossam AbdelMeguid
  • 12.
    Content Aim Recenttechnical developments Practical impact Deliverables and future work
  • 13.
    Aim Develop theoryand software and solve case studies for optimal steady state pressure control in the form of time schedules flow modulation curves
  • 14.
    Recent technical developments Modification of the algorithm to include boundary and internal PRVs Implementation of GUI to pressure control module (PCM) Solution of the case studies E067 and E093 Isolation of the PCM from FINESSE and connection to PIGM Boundary PRV Boundary PRV Internal PRV
  • 15.
  • 16.
  • 17.
    Command-line FINESSETools E067.pcm  Technical developments All other applications Read / write 800xA PGIM Read / write HDA / DA FINESSE modules, e.g Pressure Control, Pump Scheduling, Demand Prediction OPC clinet tool
  • 18.
    YWS case-studies DMAE067-Waterside case study, leakage reduced by 30% DMA E093-Barrowby case study, leakage reduced by 45%
  • 19.
    Practical applications andimpact Leakage management and cost analysis Calculation of optimal time schedules for PRVs Calculation of optimal flow modulation curves for PRVs Used by supervisory pressure control system Embedded into decision support software Deliverables and future work D2.3 - Pressure control case studies, reports Future work – case studies for A016-HP and J712-HP DMAs equipped with Aquai-Mod controllers
  • 20.
    Dynamic pressure controlBogumil Ulanicki
  • 21.
    Aim Develop theoryand software for robust dynamic pressure control for application in: electronic controllers hydraulic controllers
  • 22.
    NEPTUNE Workshop Esholt Hall, 9th July 2008 PID controller uses only pressure measurements Previous work
  • 23.
    NEPTUNE Workshop Esholt Hall, 9th July 2008 Modified controller uses information about both the outlet pressure and the valve flow. Recent technical developments
  • 24.
    Proposing a newcontroller Performing simulation studies using Matlab/Simulink NEPTUNE Workshop Esholt Hall, 9th July 2008 Recent technical developments
  • 25.
    Simulation result ofpressure tracking with a linear flow modulation curve NEPTUNE Workshop Esholt Hall, 9th July 2008 Recent technical developments
  • 26.
    Shows potential performanceof electronic controllers Some ideas can be transferred to a hydraulic controller Reference point to compare the dynamic performance of the hydraulic controllers, e.g. Aquai-Mod controller Deliverables and future work D2.3 - Pressure control case studies, reports Future work – case studies for A016-HP and J712-HP DMAs equipped with Aquai-Mod controllers Generalisation of the controller algorithm for DMAs with many inlets NEPTUNE Workshop Esholt Hall, 9th July 2008 Practical applications and impact
  • 27.
    Test rigexperiments on Aquai-Mod controller Piotr Skworcow, Hossam AbdelMeguid (DMU) David Hurley, Mark Lock (Aquavent)
  • 28.
    Aims Test Aquai-Modcontroller in a test rig and field conditions Derive and calibrate a mathematical model of the controller Compare the performance of the hydraulic controller against the electronic controller through simulations
  • 29.
    Recent technical developments Purchase and installation of the monitoring equipment: pressure transmitters, LVDT, flow meter, data acquisition card, LabView software, etc. Derivation of a mathematical model of the controller Carrying out test sessions
  • 30.
    Mathematical model Understanding the valve operations General equations Parameter values derived from the controller dimensions Parameter values derived from measurements Model validation from dynamic measurements
  • 31.
  • 32.
  • 33.
    Preliminary measurement resultsThe measured flow modulation curve
  • 34.
    Practical applications andimpact Understanding steady-state and dynamic properties of the controller Benchmarking against standard pilot valve; assessing its value as a replacement for the traditional pilot valve Suggesting potential improvements to the controller Deliverables and future work D2.4 - Report on the test results Finishing the measurements, calibration of the model
  • 35.
    Combined energy andpressure management Hossam AbdelMeguid, Peter Bounds, Piotr Skworcow , Bogumil Ulanicki
  • 36.
    Purpose Proposed solutionSoftware implementation Case study Conclusions Outline
  • 37.
    Purpose Minimize costof water treatment and pumps energy usage whilst supplying good service to customers without unnecessarily high pressure Integration and co-ordination of pump control in grid with pressure control of DMAs Pump scheduling Pressure control Combined energy and pressure management Calculate time schedules for treatment works, pumps, valves, reservoirs and PRV setpoints
  • 38.
    Proposed Solution Formulateas optimisation problem; cost function: Total cost of water treatment and pumps energy use Inclusion of PRV model – setpoint as decision variable Network model with pressure dependent leakage: Excessive Pumping High energy cost High pressure Increased leakage More water from sources and to be pumped £ £ £
  • 39.
    Implementation Embedded intothe FINESSE software
  • 40.
    Case Study 1Harrogate (Yorkshire Water): 10621 Nodes 11293 Pipes 14 PS 6 Reservoirs 243 Valves Total Demand: 400 l/s
  • 41.
    Case Study 2Oldham (United Utilities): 3 WTW 10 Reservoirs 11 PS 80 DMA 3 Ind. Users 4m kWh £280k
  • 42.
    Conclusions Minimize costof water treatment and pumps energy usage whilst supplying good service to customers without unnecessarily high pressure Combined energy and pressure management Formulation as optimisation problem with network model with pressure dependent leakage Solver embedded into FINESSE software Cases to be solved: Harrogate (Yorkshire), Oldham (UU)