The document discusses the key similarities and differences between COM and CORBA distributed object systems. Both COM and CORBA provide mechanisms for remote object access through proxies, stubs, and skeletons. However, COM relies more on Windows registry registration and binary type libraries, while CORBA focuses on vendor-neutral interface definitions and does not depend on a specific operating system.
Component Object Model (COM, DCOM, COM+)Peter R. Egli
Overview of Microsoft COM / DCOM technology.
DCOM is Microsoft's component technology and can be roughly compared to CORBA technology. DCOM is however tightly bound to the Windows operating system (Win32 API). Windows Runtime is a newer Microsoft technology that borrows much of the concepts of COM/DCOM.
Common Object Request Broker Architecture - CORBAPeter R. Egli
Overview of CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) object technology.
CORBA is a distributed object technology (DOT) that extends the remote procedure call semantics to distributed objects.
Object interfaces are described in a formal language called IDL (Interface Description Language) that allows generating stubs and skeletons through an IDL compiler.
Component Object Model (COM, DCOM, COM+)Peter R. Egli
Overview of Microsoft COM / DCOM technology.
DCOM is Microsoft's component technology and can be roughly compared to CORBA technology. DCOM is however tightly bound to the Windows operating system (Win32 API). Windows Runtime is a newer Microsoft technology that borrows much of the concepts of COM/DCOM.
Common Object Request Broker Architecture - CORBAPeter R. Egli
Overview of CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) object technology.
CORBA is a distributed object technology (DOT) that extends the remote procedure call semantics to distributed objects.
Object interfaces are described in a formal language called IDL (Interface Description Language) that allows generating stubs and skeletons through an IDL compiler.
Multi-touch Interface for Controlling Multiple Mobile RobotsJun Kato
Draw a stream, drift robots. That's the way I introduced to control movements of multiple mobile robots simultaneously, in CHI'09 Student Research Competition. This talk presents the interface in detail, and its future work.
26/04/09 YouTube video inserted at the last.
With the official release of Java EE 6 in December 2009 a new version of the Enterprise JavaBeans specification also saw the light. Enterprise JavaBeans is an architecture for the development and deployment of component-based business applications. Applications written using the Enterprise JavaBeans architecture are scalable, transactional, and concurrent.
While a lot of faithful EJB developer's have been scared away from the specification and some of its unfortunate implementations in the past five years, EJB 3.1 has all the ingredients that make for a successful lightweight component based implementation. At last a decent implementation of a server-side component framework as part of the Java EE specification. This no longer makes you dependent on rebel frameworks such as the Spring framework.
EJB 3.1 continues down the path where EJB 3.0 left us off. The purpose of the Enterprise JavaBeans 3.1 specification is to further simplify the EJB architecture by reducing its complexity from the developer's point of view, while also adding new functionality in response to the needs of the community. Although the Java Persistence API was developed within EJB 3.0, it now evolves under a separate JSR rather than within EJB 3.1 and will therefore not be covered in this presentation.
This presentation will mainly focus on the new features introduced by EJB 3.1 and the basics of EJB are only covered very briefly. Topics covered include: EJB Lite, simple packaging, no-interface local view, portable JNDI names, Embeddable API, Startup/shutdown callbacks, Singleton beans, the new and improved timer and scheduler component, Async invocations, and REST integration.
Not knowing the difference between a Bitmap and Vector image could mean that your visual content leaves you looking unprofessional. Check out the differences in this presentation.
Advantages of .NET over the other languages, overview of .NET binaries, Intermediate Language, metadata, .NET Namespaces, Common Language runtime, common type system, common Language Specification.
C# fundamentals – C# class, object, string formatting, Types, scope, constants, C# iteration, control flow, operators, array, string, Enumerations, structures, custom Namespaces
DCOM (Distributed Component Object Model) and CORBA (Common Object Request Broker Architecture) are two popular distributed object models. In this paper, we make architectural comparison of DCOM and CORBA at three different layers: basic programming architecture, remoting architecture, and the wire protocol architecture.
Aspect Oriented Programming Through C#.NETWaqas Tariq
.NET architecture was introduced by Microsoft as a new software development environment based on components. This architecture permits for effortless integration of classical distributed programming paradigms with Web computing. .NET describes a type structure and introduces ideas such as component, objects and interface which form the vital foundation for distributed component-based software development. Just as other component frameworks, .NET largely puts more emphasis on functional aspects of components. Non-functional interfaces including CPU usage, memory usage, fault tolerance and security issues are however not presently implemented in .NET’s constituent interfaces. These attributes are vital for developing dependable distributed applications capable of exhibiting consistent behavior and withstanding faults.
.NET online training offered by Quontra Solutions with special features having Extensive Training will be in both .NET Online Training and Placement. We help you in resume preparation and conducting Mock Interviews.
Emphasis is given on important topics that were required and mostly used in real time projects. Quontra Solutions is an Online Training Leader when it comes to high-end effective and efficient IT Training. We have always been and still are focusing on the key aspect which is providing utmost effective and competent training to both students and professionals who are eager to enrich their technical skills.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
Key Trends Shaping the Future of Infrastructure.pdfCheryl Hung
Keynote at DIGIT West Expo, Glasgow on 29 May 2024.
Cheryl Hung, ochery.com
Sr Director, Infrastructure Ecosystem, Arm.
The key trends across hardware, cloud and open-source; exploring how these areas are likely to mature and develop over the short and long-term, and then considering how organisations can position themselves to adapt and thrive.
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
Encryption in Microsoft 365 - ExpertsLive Netherlands 2024Albert Hoitingh
In this session I delve into the encryption technology used in Microsoft 365 and Microsoft Purview. Including the concepts of Customer Key and Double Key Encryption.
Builder.ai Founder Sachin Dev Duggal's Strategic Approach to Create an Innova...Ramesh Iyer
In today's fast-changing business world, Companies that adapt and embrace new ideas often need help to keep up with the competition. However, fostering a culture of innovation takes much work. It takes vision, leadership and willingness to take risks in the right proportion. Sachin Dev Duggal, co-founder of Builder.ai, has perfected the art of this balance, creating a company culture where creativity and growth are nurtured at each stage.
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Neuro-symbolic is not enough, we need neuro-*semantic*Frank van Harmelen
Neuro-symbolic (NeSy) AI is on the rise. However, simply machine learning on just any symbolic structure is not sufficient to really harvest the gains of NeSy. These will only be gained when the symbolic structures have an actual semantics. I give an operational definition of semantics as “predictable inference”.
All of this illustrated with link prediction over knowledge graphs, but the argument is general.
AI for Every Business: Unlocking Your Product's Universal Potential by VP of ...
COM
1.
2. In-Place Activation Linking Embedding Drag and Drop Automation Uniform Data Transfer Persistent Storage Monikers Component Object Model Compound Documents COM OLE
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
34.
35.
36.
37.
38.
39.
40.
41.
42.
43.
44.
45.
46. COM – CORBA Comparison Trait Similarities Differences Interfaces Each uses their own IDL to describe interfaces. CORBA IDL is simpler an elegant than COM IDL COM has better tool support for creating and managing IDL than CORBA Datatypes Both support a rich set of data types Both also support constants, enumerated types, structures and arrays. COM has automation types. Automation compatible interfaces are supported in more client environments than non-compatible interfaces. Because the non-compatible interfaces are not guaranteed to work other than C++. Any CORBA interface can be used from any CORBA client
47. COM – CORBA Contd… Trait Similarities Differences Proxies, Stubs & Skeletons COM and CORBA rely on client stubs and server stubs to handle remoting issues. COM & CORBA generate client stubs and server stubs from IDL. COM client & server stubs are called as Proxy & Stub and in CORBA called as Stub & Skeleton. COM proxy-stub DLLs are used by all language environments. In CORBA, a separate stub-skeleton must be generated for each ORB/language combination. Marshaling & Unmarshaling COM and CORBA handle marshaling in client stubs and server stubs. Users do not need to worry about marshaling. COM allows automation-compatible interfaces to use type library marshaling, thus eliminating the need for customized stubs.
48. COM – CORBA Contd… Trait Similarities Differences Object Handles COM & CORBA support reference counted handles on object instances. COM calls object handles as interface pointers and CORBA calls as object references. CORBA supports multiple inheritance in the interface hierarchy. COM supports single inheritance only; however a COM object supports one ore more distinct interfaces. Object Creation Both use factories to create objects instances. COM has a standard factory interface called IClassFactory CORBA factories are customized persistent CORBA objects.
49. COM – CORBA Contd… Trait Similarities Differences Object Invocation Both allow for method invocation similar to native environment method invocation. COM’s error-handling mechanism is based on HRESULT return values. CORBA supports user-defined exception types in IDL. Object Destruction COM and CORBA rely on reference counting to determine when an object can be destroyed COM supports distributed reference counting and garbage collection. CORBA reference counts are maintained separately in the client and server.