SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 46
TU-CHEMNITZ

ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES

    COHERENCE & COHESION




            Presenter: Raşide Dağ
Introduction:
   What makes a text cohere?

   What differentiates a cohesive grammatical
    unit from a random collection of sentences?
Introduction:
   Cohension and coherence are terms used in
    discourse analysis and text linguistics to
    describe the properties of written texts.

   Advertising language tends not to use clear
    markers of cohesion, but is interpreted as
    being coherent.
Definitions:
 Coherence:
 The ways a text makes sense to readers & writer through
 the relevance and accessibility of its configuration of
 concepts, ideas and theories.


 Cohesion:
 The grammatical and lexical relationship between different
 elements of a text which hold it together.
 Coherence :
   a semantic property of discourse formed through
    the interpretation of each individual sentence
    relative to the interpretation of other sentences,
    with "interpretation" implying interaction between
    the text, the reader and the writer.
    a property that a reader will discern in the text
    allows the reader to make sense of the text
   refers to the semantic unity created between the
    ideas, sentences, paragraphs and sections of a
    piece of writing.
Coherence vs. Cohesion
Coherence:                       Cohesion:
   very general principle of       formal linguistic features
    interpretation of language       e.g repetition,reference
    in context                      semantic relationships
   fewer formal linguistic          between sentences and
    features                         within sentences
                                    determined by lexically
    e.g vocabulary choice            and grammatically overt
   relationships deal with          intersentential
    text as a whole                  relationships
   based on primarily
    semantic relationships        more recognizable
     errors much more
    obvious
Is it coherent or not?
   The ancient Egyptians were masters of preserving dead
    people's bodies by making mummies of them. Mummies
    several thousand years old have been discovered nearly
    intact. The skin, hair, teeth, fingernails and toenails, and
    facial features of the mummies were evident. It is possible
    to diagnose the disease they suffered in life, such as
    smallpox, arthritis, and nutritional deficiencies. The
    process was remarkably effective. Sometimes apparent
    were the fatal afflictions of the dead people: a middle-aged
    king died from a blow on the head, and polio killed a child
    king. Mummification consisted of removing the internal
    organs, applying natural preservatives inside and out, and
    then wrapping the body in layers of bandages.
Below is the same paragraph revised for coherence. Italics
indicates pronouns and repeated key words, bold indicates
transitional tag-words, and underlining indicates parallel
structures.

    The ancient Egyptians were masters of preserving dead
    people's bodies by making mummies of them. In short,
    mummification consisted of removing the internal organs,
    applying natural preservatives inside and out, and then
    wrapping the body in layers of bandages. And the process
    was remarkably effective. Indeed, mummies several
    thousand years old have been discovered nearly intact.
    Their skin, hair, teeth, fingernails and toenails, and facial
    features are still evident. Their diseases in life, such as
    smallpox, arthritis, and nutritional deficiencies, are still
    diagnosable. Even their fatal afflictions are still apparent:
    a middle-aged king died from a blow on the head; a child
    king died from polio.
According to Halliday & Hasan,
A text is a semantic unit whose parts are linked together by
 explicit cohesive ties.
Cohesive tie: a semantic and /or lexico-grammatic relation
 between an element in text and some other element that is
 crucial to interpretetion of it.

    Eventhough within-sentence ties occur the cohesive ties
    across ‘sentence boundaries’are those which allow sequences
    of sentences to be understood as text.

    Cohesion therefore defines a text as text.
Halliday & Hasan identify general categories of
cohesive devices that signal coherence in texts:


   Reference
   Ellipsis         Grammatical
   Substitution     Cohesion
   Conjunction
   Lexical Cohesion
Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of
Cohesive Devices :
   Reference :
    Replacement of words and expressions with pro-
    forms.
    e.g pronouns,pro-modifiers.

Three types of reference:
        Personal
        Demonstrative
        Comparative
Cohesion consists in continuity of referential
     meaning (relatedness of reference) ;

                  Personal (communication goal of referent)



REFERENCE         Demonstrative (proximity of referent)


                  Comparative ( similarity to preceding referent)
Types of reference:
Personal Reference
  a reference by means of person,
 includes;

Personal pronouns (e.g., I, he, she)
Possesive pronouns (e.g., mine, hers, his)
Possesive determiners (e.g., my, your, her)
e.g. English is considered an international language.
   It is a spoken by more than 260 million people all
   over the world.
    They told me you had gone by her car
Demonstrative Reference
  essentially a form of verbal pointing
 the speaker identifies the referent by locating it

on a scale of proximity.
 In general,



     this, these and here imply proximity to the
    speaker;
     that, those and there imply distance from the
    speaker.
Demonstrative Reference
    Like personals, the demonstratives regularly refer
    exophorically to something within the context of
    situaiton.

e.g. How do you like a cruise in that yacht?
     Pick these up!
Comparative Reference
  contributes to textual cohesion by setting up a
   relation of contrast
 expressed by such adjactives as same, identical,

   equal, adjectives in a comparative degree such as
   bigger,faster and adverbs such as identically,
   likewise, so, such etc.
e.g. She has a similarly furnished room to mine.
     The little dog barked as noisily as the big one.
     They asked me three equally difficult questions.
Halliday and Hasan call within text
     cohesive ties endophoric, and references,
     items outside the text exophoric :

              REFERENCE



  (Situational)                     (Textual)
{EXO}{PHORA}                    { ENDO}{PHORA}
                  IN(SIDE)

 OUT(SIDE)
                        {ANA}{PHORA}     {CATA}{PHORA }
Halliday and Hasan call within text cohesive
ties endophoric,
e.g. Wash and core six cooking apples. Put them
  into a fireproof dish.
   an example of an endophoric reference when
  them referred back to apples.

   Reference signals to the reader what kind of
    information is to be retrieved.
    Them, therefore, signals to the reader that he or
    she needs to look back in the text to find its
    meaning.
Anaphora (to preceding text)
Endophora
                     Cataphora (to following text)
e.g. We went to Devon for a holiday. The people we
   stayed with had four children.The eldest girl was
   about nine.
 The first the is cataphoric since there is no lexical

   relation between people and anything in the
   preceding sentence.
 The second the is both cataphoric and anaphoric

     Cataphoric: eldest defines girl,

     Anaphoric: girl is related to children
Halliday and Hasan call references, items
outside the text exophoric :
e.g. For he's a jolly good fellow
           And so say all of us.
 As readers outside of this environment, we are
  unfamiliar with who the he is that is being referred
  to,
 But, most likely, the people involved are aware of
  the he.
 When the meaning is not explicit from the text
  itself, but is obvious to those in a particular
  situation. This is called exophoric reference.
Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of
Cohesive Devices :
   Substitution :
    Replacement of one item by another.
    A relation in the wording rather than in the meaning.

     somewhat different from reference in that another word
    takes the place of the thing that is being discussed.

      Types of Substitution:
        Nominal
        Verbal
        Clausal
 Whereas reference is a relation between
meanings, substitution is a grammatical
relationship :

Types of Cohesive Relation           Linguistic Level


 Reference                               Semantic

 Substitution (including Ellipsis)       Grammatical
Types of Substitution
 Nominal Substitution:
   Nominal substitutes ;

     for noun head : one/ ones
    for nominal complement : the same
    for attribute : so


e.g. John seems to be intelligent.
    –Is he really so?
 Nominal Substitution:
   The pronoun one is often used in nominal references.

 e.g. Let's go and see the bears. The polar ones are over on
   that rock.
 In this sentence, ones is taking the place of bears in the

   previous sentence.

e.g. Winter is often so damp. The same is true for the
  summer.
 Verbal Substitution:
 The verbal substitute in English is do.
 Verbal substitutes ;

     for verb : do, be , have
     for process : do the same /likewise
     for proposition : do so, be so
e.g. The words did not come to the same as they
  used to do.
e.g. I finally called on him. I have wanted to do (so)
  for a long time.
 Clausal Substitution:
   The clausal substitutes ;
      for positive : so
      for negative : not

   In clausal substitution the entire clause is
    presupposed, and the contrasting element is
    outside the clause.
 Clausal Substitution:
e.g. Is there going to be an earthquake?
     It says so.
 so presupposes the whole of the clause there’s

   going to be an earthquake and contrastive
   environment is provided by the says which is
   outside it.
e.g. Has everyone gone home?
     I hope not.
Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of
Cohesive Devices :
   Ellipsis :
    Deletion of words, expressions or phrases,
    Simply ‘substitution by zero’.


 Types of Ellipsis:
       Nominal
       Verbal
       Clausal
Types of Ellipsis
Nominal Ellipsis :
   ellipsis within the nominal group.
e.g. Here are thirteen cards.
    Take any (-).Now give me any three (-).
e.g. Some say one thing, others say another (-).
e.g. Which hat will you wear ?
      This is the best (-).
e.g. Have another chocolate.
     No thanks; that was my third (-).
e.g. Smith was the first person to leave. I was the
   second (-).
Verbal Ellipsis :
   ellipsis within the verbal group.

e.g. Have you been swimming? Yes, I have.
e.g. What have you been doing? Swimming.
e.g. Is he complaining? He may be; I don’t care.
e.g. I haven’t finished it yet. I hope you’re going to
   have by tomorrow.
e.g. Some were laughing and others cyring.
e.g. Were you laughing? No I wasn’t.
e.g. John came, did not he? NO, but he will.
Clausal Ellipsis :
   ellipsis in which an entire clause is elided from a sentence.

e.g. Smith was going to take part but somebody
   telephoned and asked to see him urgently so he
   had to withdraw.- Who ?
e.g. I kept quiet because Mary gets embarrassed if
   anyone mentions about John’s name. I don’t know
   why.
e.g. Who could have broken those tiles?- I can’t
   think who.
Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of
Cohesive Devices :
   Conjunctions :
    a word or group of words used to connect words,
    phrases, or clauses.
    •   mark certain relationsips between clauses and sentences

Four categories:
       Additive
       Adversative
       Causal
       Temporal
Categories of Conjunction
         Examples :

For the whole day he climbed up the steep mountainnside,
 almost without stopping.
And in all this time he met no one. ►Additive
Yet he was hardly aware of being tired. ►Adversative
So by the night time the valley was far below him.► Causal
Then, as dusk fell, he sat down to rest. ►Temporal
Types of Conjunction
Additive type
   The additive is a kind of conjunctive relation
   which is closer to coordination.
 Additive words are such as and, also, nor, or else,

   moreover, in addition, besides, by the way, that is,
   likewise, similarly, conversely, thus, for instance.
e.g. My client says he does not know his witness.
   Further, he denies ever having seen her.
e.g. Perhaps she missed her train. Or else she’s
   changed her mind and isn’t coming.
Types of Conjunction
    Adversative type
 The basic meaning of the adversative relation is
  ‘contrary to expectation’.
 Adversative words are such as yet, but, however,

  despite this, on the other hand, in fact, instead,
  either way, anyhow, nevertheless, rather etc.
e.g. All the figures were correct; they’d been
  checked. Yet the total came out wrong.
e.g. We maybe back tonight; I’m not sure. Either
  way, just make yourself at home.
Types of Conjunction
    Causal type
  Causal relation involves primarily reason, result
   and purpose relations between the sentences.
 Causal words are such as so, thus, hence,

   therefore, arising out of this, in that case,
   otherwise, because, as a result (of this), on this
   basis, accordingly.
e.g. You are not leaving, are you? Because I’ve got
   something to say to you.
e.g. I was not informed. Otherwise I should have
   taken some action.
Types of Conjunction
    Temporal type
   The relation between two successive sentences.
 Conjunctions of this type are such as then, next,

   afterward, previously, finally, at last, meanwhile,
   next day, first, from now on, to sum up, in short,
   henceforward, hitherto, up to now, this time etc.
e.g. The weather cleared just as the party
   approached the summit. Until then they had been
   nothing of the panaroma around them.
e.g. At last, he finished the rehersal for his role.
Coordination
       CONJUNCTIONS
                                      Subordination
   Coordinating conjunctions              Subordinating conjunctions
    connect words, phrases, or              connect clauses that are of
    clauses of equal grammatical            subordinate importance to the
    rank.                                   independent clause or to
   For, and, nor, but, or, yet, so         some element in the main
                                            clause.
e.g. I used phonics in learning to         although, except, though,
   read, and so did you.                    while, if, whether as, as if,
e.g. Though he seemed to be                 where, wherever, in order
    tired, he did not refused to go         that, so that, after, as long as,
    out.                                    as soon as, before, since,
                                            when etc.
Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of
Cohesive Devices :
   Lexical Cohesion :
    achieved by the selection of vocabulary.

 Types of Lexical Cohesion :
  Reiteration

  Collocation
Types of Lexical Cohesion
 Reiteration :
 a form of lexical cohesion which involves
  repetition, synonym or near synonym,superordinate
  and a general noun.
e.g. Pollution of our environment has occurred for
  centuries, but it has become a significant health
  problem only within the last century. Atmospheric
  pollution contributes to respiratory disease, and to
  lung cancer in particular. Other health problems
  directly related to air pollutants include heart
  disease, eye irritation and so on. Repetition
 Reiteration :
e.g. Henry’s has bought a new jaguar. He
   practically lives in the car.  Superordinate
e.g. I turned to the ascent of the peak.The climb is
   perfectly is easy.  Synonym
e.g. I turned to the ascent of the peak. The thing is
   perfectly is easy.  General noun
e.g. There is a boy climbing that tree. The lad is
   going to fall if he doesn’t take care.  Near
   -Synonym
 Collocation :
    Cohesion that is achieved through the association of
    lexical items that regularly co-occur.
    These lexical items or words tend to occur in similar
    environments.
   For instance; hair/comb, reader/writer, door/window,
    chair/table, north/south, peace/war, bee/honey etc.

e.g. Why does this little boy wriggle all the time? Girl
   don’t wriggle.
Analysis of Coherence
   Hello, James Gleick," said Amazon.com the other day
    (click here if you’re someone else). "Take a peek at your
    brand new music recommendations."
       I peeked. Amazon’s computers predicted that I would
    like the Beastie Boys, Adiemus, Frank Sinatra, Harvey
    Danger, and the Dave Matthews Band. What an impressive
    list! All right, I don’t actually care for any of these, but
    still. It was quite a shot in the dark, considering I’d never
    been to Amazon’s music department before. This is the
    way it’s going on the Internet: if marketers want your
    money and your time and your "eyeballs," they feel they
    should figure out who you are and what you like.
Analysis of Coherence:
   Repetition of : peek
   Repetition of pronoun: I
    Pronoun reference: these
    Transitional tag: but still
    Pronoun reference: it , this
    Repetition and parallel form : your money and your time
    and your eyeballs
    Pronoun reference : they and you
    Parallel form: who you are and what you like
Analysis of Coherence

   Late in the early morning hours, in a Spanish cafe,
    an old man drinks brandy. A young waiter is
    angry; he wishes that the old man would leave so
    that he and an older waiter could close the cafe
    and go home. He insults the deaf old man and is
    painfully indifferent to the older waiter’s feelings
    when he states that “an old man is a nasty thing.”
    The older waiter, however, realizes that the old
    man drinking brandy after brandy is not nasty; he
    is only lonely. No doubt, that’s the reason why the
    old man tried to hang himself last week. When the
    old man leaves, the waiters close the cafe.
References:
   Halliday & Hasan (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman. London &
    Newyork.
   Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes. Routledge, Great Britain.
   Reid, J.M. The Process of Composition. Second Edition. Prentice Hall
    Regents.

   http://www.hku.hk/linguist/cou/adv. Retrieved 9th May, 2007.
   http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/transitions.htm. Retrieved 9th May,
    2007.
   http://home.eserver.org/danzico/Discourse/hallidaysummary.html. Retrieved
    11th May, 2007.
   http://www.jstor.org. Retrieved 9th May, 2007.
    www.gpc.edu/~lawowl/handouts/conjunctions.pdf. Retrieved 9th May, 2007.
    http://www.cliffsnotes.com. Retrieved 11th May, 2007.

More Related Content

What's hot

what is stylistics and its levels 1.Phonological level 2.Graphological leve...
what is stylistics and its levels 1.Phonological level   2.Graphological leve...what is stylistics and its levels 1.Phonological level   2.Graphological leve...
what is stylistics and its levels 1.Phonological level 2.Graphological leve...RajpootBhatti5
 
Cohesive devices
Cohesive devicesCohesive devices
Cohesive devicesAce Abdul
 
Discourse Grammar
Discourse GrammarDiscourse Grammar
Discourse GrammarAwan Kamal
 
Constatives & performatives
Constatives & performativesConstatives & performatives
Constatives & performativesAli Furqan Syed
 
Lexical relations
Lexical relationsLexical relations
Lexical relationsHina Honey
 
Pragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentationPragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentationMehwish Nazar
 
Pragmatics implicature
Pragmatics implicaturePragmatics implicature
Pragmatics implicaturephannguyen161
 
Semantic roles
Semantic rolesSemantic roles
Semantic rolesBuhsra
 
Grammatical cohesion .
Grammatical cohesion .Grammatical cohesion .
Grammatical cohesion .SakarHussein
 
Discourse and Genre (the relationship between discourse and genre)
Discourse and Genre (the relationship between discourse and genre) Discourse and Genre (the relationship between discourse and genre)
Discourse and Genre (the relationship between discourse and genre) Aticka Dewi
 
Sense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & SemanticsSense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & SemanticsAfuza Shara
 
Pragmatics: Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
Pragmatics:  Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.PptxPragmatics:  Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
Pragmatics: Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.PptxDr. Shadia Banjar
 
Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics
Discourse Analysis and PragmaticsDiscourse Analysis and Pragmatics
Discourse Analysis and PragmaticsMutiara Ayu
 

What's hot (20)

what is stylistics and its levels 1.Phonological level 2.Graphological leve...
what is stylistics and its levels 1.Phonological level   2.Graphological leve...what is stylistics and its levels 1.Phonological level   2.Graphological leve...
what is stylistics and its levels 1.Phonological level 2.Graphological leve...
 
Cohesive devices
Cohesive devicesCohesive devices
Cohesive devices
 
Discourse Grammar
Discourse GrammarDiscourse Grammar
Discourse Grammar
 
Constatives & performatives
Constatives & performativesConstatives & performatives
Constatives & performatives
 
Speech acts
Speech actsSpeech acts
Speech acts
 
Lexical relations
Lexical relationsLexical relations
Lexical relations
 
Pragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentationPragmatics presentation
Pragmatics presentation
 
Pragmatics implicature
Pragmatics implicaturePragmatics implicature
Pragmatics implicature
 
Ellipsis in english
Ellipsis in englishEllipsis in english
Ellipsis in english
 
Pedagogical stylistics
Pedagogical stylisticsPedagogical stylistics
Pedagogical stylistics
 
Semantic roles
Semantic rolesSemantic roles
Semantic roles
 
Cohesion Types
Cohesion TypesCohesion Types
Cohesion Types
 
Grammatical cohesion .
Grammatical cohesion .Grammatical cohesion .
Grammatical cohesion .
 
Discourse and Genre (the relationship between discourse and genre)
Discourse and Genre (the relationship between discourse and genre) Discourse and Genre (the relationship between discourse and genre)
Discourse and Genre (the relationship between discourse and genre)
 
Sentence semantics
Sentence semanticsSentence semantics
Sentence semantics
 
Stylistics
StylisticsStylistics
Stylistics
 
Discourse analysis
Discourse analysisDiscourse analysis
Discourse analysis
 
Sense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & SemanticsSense relations & Semantics
Sense relations & Semantics
 
Pragmatics: Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
Pragmatics:  Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.PptxPragmatics:  Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
Pragmatics: Deixis And Distance By Dr.Shadia.Pptx
 
Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics
Discourse Analysis and PragmaticsDiscourse Analysis and Pragmatics
Discourse Analysis and Pragmatics
 

Viewers also liked

Coherence, cohesion, & unity
Coherence, cohesion, & unityCoherence, cohesion, & unity
Coherence, cohesion, & unityzsekimoto
 
Coherence And Cohesion
Coherence And CohesionCoherence And Cohesion
Coherence And Cohesiontimberlakon
 
Unity, coherence, emphasis
Unity, coherence, emphasisUnity, coherence, emphasis
Unity, coherence, emphasisNick Nicolas
 
Coherence and cohesion
Coherence and cohesionCoherence and cohesion
Coherence and cohesionupscale_93
 
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in InterpretationDISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in InterpretationSiti Purwaningsih
 
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in InterpretationDISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in InterpretationSiti Purwaningsih
 
The role of context in interpretation chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbal
The role of context in interpretation    chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbalThe role of context in interpretation    chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbal
The role of context in interpretation chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbalFayez Habbal
 
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)Faiza Sandhu
 
Chunhyang: the Love Story of Spring Fragrance
Chunhyang: the Love Story of Spring FragranceChunhyang: the Love Story of Spring Fragrance
Chunhyang: the Love Story of Spring FragranceJacob Lotinga
 
Argumentative essay ppt
Argumentative essay pptArgumentative essay ppt
Argumentative essay pptjdsmithii
 
ORAL COMMUNICATION - TYPES OF SPEECH STYLE
ORAL COMMUNICATION - TYPES OF SPEECH STYLEORAL COMMUNICATION - TYPES OF SPEECH STYLE
ORAL COMMUNICATION - TYPES OF SPEECH STYLEJohn Elmos Seastres
 
Sorry, wrong number
Sorry, wrong numberSorry, wrong number
Sorry, wrong numberlourd2000
 

Viewers also liked (20)

Coherence, cohesion, & unity
Coherence, cohesion, & unityCoherence, cohesion, & unity
Coherence, cohesion, & unity
 
Cohesion and coherence
Cohesion and coherenceCohesion and coherence
Cohesion and coherence
 
Coherence And Cohesion
Coherence And CohesionCoherence And Cohesion
Coherence And Cohesion
 
Unity, coherence, emphasis
Unity, coherence, emphasisUnity, coherence, emphasis
Unity, coherence, emphasis
 
Coherence in Writing
Coherence in WritingCoherence in Writing
Coherence in Writing
 
Coherence and cohesion
Coherence and cohesionCoherence and cohesion
Coherence and cohesion
 
Example of a unified paragraph
Example of a unified paragraphExample of a unified paragraph
Example of a unified paragraph
 
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in InterpretationDISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
 
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in InterpretationDISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
DISCOURSE The Role of Context in Interpretation
 
The role of context in interpretation chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbal
The role of context in interpretation    chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbalThe role of context in interpretation    chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbal
The role of context in interpretation chapter (2) mohammad fayez al-habbal
 
Grammar
GrammarGrammar
Grammar
 
Cohesion In English
Cohesion In EnglishCohesion In English
Cohesion In English
 
Cohesion and coherence
Cohesion and coherenceCohesion and coherence
Cohesion and coherence
 
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)
The Role of context (Discourse Analysis)
 
Anton chekhov
Anton chekhovAnton chekhov
Anton chekhov
 
Chunhyang: the Love Story of Spring Fragrance
Chunhyang: the Love Story of Spring FragranceChunhyang: the Love Story of Spring Fragrance
Chunhyang: the Love Story of Spring Fragrance
 
Argumentative essay ppt
Argumentative essay pptArgumentative essay ppt
Argumentative essay ppt
 
ORAL COMMUNICATION - TYPES OF SPEECH STYLE
ORAL COMMUNICATION - TYPES OF SPEECH STYLEORAL COMMUNICATION - TYPES OF SPEECH STYLE
ORAL COMMUNICATION - TYPES OF SPEECH STYLE
 
Sorry, wrong number
Sorry, wrong numberSorry, wrong number
Sorry, wrong number
 
Oral Comm - Types of Speech Act
Oral Comm - Types of Speech ActOral Comm - Types of Speech Act
Oral Comm - Types of Speech Act
 

Similar to Cohesion and coherence

8_2018_04_01!09_53_37_PM.ppt
8_2018_04_01!09_53_37_PM.ppt8_2018_04_01!09_53_37_PM.ppt
8_2018_04_01!09_53_37_PM.pptHongTrngHuy2
 
Textual cohesion
Textual cohesionTextual cohesion
Textual cohesionmrstovila
 
Presentation of text linguistics
Presentation of text linguisticsPresentation of text linguistics
Presentation of text linguisticsali906151
 
Presentation of text linguistics
Presentation of text linguisticsPresentation of text linguistics
Presentation of text linguisticsSyed Aitsam Haider
 
The nature of reference in text and in powerpoint presentation
The nature of reference in text and in powerpoint presentationThe nature of reference in text and in powerpoint presentation
The nature of reference in text and in powerpoint presentationRafaqat Hussain Rafaqat
 
Sense relations (linguistics)
Sense relations (linguistics)Sense relations (linguistics)
Sense relations (linguistics)Erick Mwacha
 
LexicalContrastiveAnalysis. adkdhfjhdfjhd djhfsdhfhfhsd jhsdfsdhksdkfjksd...
LexicalContrastiveAnalysis. adkdhfjhdfjhd    djhfsdhfhfhsd  jhsdfsdhksdkfjksd...LexicalContrastiveAnalysis. adkdhfjhdfjhd    djhfsdhfhfhsd  jhsdfsdhksdkfjksd...
LexicalContrastiveAnalysis. adkdhfjhdfjhd djhfsdhfhfhsd jhsdfsdhksdkfjksd...MonsefJraid
 
20196306 introduction-to-discourse-analysis
20196306 introduction-to-discourse-analysis20196306 introduction-to-discourse-analysis
20196306 introduction-to-discourse-analysisshidiq
 
Morphology and syntax
Morphology and syntaxMorphology and syntax
Morphology and syntaxSohaibisrar1
 
Reference, Sense, and Referring Expression in Semantics
Reference, Sense, and Referring Expression in SemanticsReference, Sense, and Referring Expression in Semantics
Reference, Sense, and Referring Expression in SemanticsErsa Dewana
 
Terminolog yand vocabhandout
Terminolog yand vocabhandoutTerminolog yand vocabhandout
Terminolog yand vocabhandoutGiovanni Tovar
 

Similar to Cohesion and coherence (20)

8_2018_04_01!09_53_37_PM.ppt
8_2018_04_01!09_53_37_PM.ppt8_2018_04_01!09_53_37_PM.ppt
8_2018_04_01!09_53_37_PM.ppt
 
Textual cohesion
Textual cohesionTextual cohesion
Textual cohesion
 
Cohesion And Coherence1
Cohesion And Coherence1Cohesion And Coherence1
Cohesion And Coherence1
 
Cohesion And Coherence1
Cohesion And Coherence1Cohesion And Coherence1
Cohesion And Coherence1
 
Presentation of text linguistics
Presentation of text linguisticsPresentation of text linguistics
Presentation of text linguistics
 
Presentation of text linguistics
Presentation of text linguisticsPresentation of text linguistics
Presentation of text linguistics
 
Cohesion types
Cohesion typesCohesion types
Cohesion types
 
The nature of reference in text and in powerpoint presentation
The nature of reference in text and in powerpoint presentationThe nature of reference in text and in powerpoint presentation
The nature of reference in text and in powerpoint presentation
 
Linguistics5
Linguistics5         Linguistics5
Linguistics5
 
Sense relations (linguistics)
Sense relations (linguistics)Sense relations (linguistics)
Sense relations (linguistics)
 
Word Meaning
Word MeaningWord Meaning
Word Meaning
 
Lexical cohesion
Lexical cohesionLexical cohesion
Lexical cohesion
 
LexicalContrastiveAnalysis. adkdhfjhdfjhd djhfsdhfhfhsd jhsdfsdhksdkfjksd...
LexicalContrastiveAnalysis. adkdhfjhdfjhd    djhfsdhfhfhsd  jhsdfsdhksdkfjksd...LexicalContrastiveAnalysis. adkdhfjhdfjhd    djhfsdhfhfhsd  jhsdfsdhksdkfjksd...
LexicalContrastiveAnalysis. adkdhfjhdfjhd djhfsdhfhfhsd jhsdfsdhksdkfjksd...
 
20196306 introduction-to-discourse-analysis
20196306 introduction-to-discourse-analysis20196306 introduction-to-discourse-analysis
20196306 introduction-to-discourse-analysis
 
Morphology and syntax
Morphology and syntaxMorphology and syntax
Morphology and syntax
 
Reference, Sense, and Referring Expression in Semantics
Reference, Sense, and Referring Expression in SemanticsReference, Sense, and Referring Expression in Semantics
Reference, Sense, and Referring Expression in Semantics
 
Terminolog yand vocabhandout
Terminolog yand vocabhandoutTerminolog yand vocabhandout
Terminolog yand vocabhandout
 
Semantic
SemanticSemantic
Semantic
 
Semantics lecture 2
Semantics   lecture 2Semantics   lecture 2
Semantics lecture 2
 
SEMANTICS
SEMANTICS SEMANTICS
SEMANTICS
 

Cohesion and coherence

  • 1. TU-CHEMNITZ ENGLISH FOR ACADEMIC PURPOSES COHERENCE & COHESION Presenter: Raşide Dağ
  • 2. Introduction:  What makes a text cohere?  What differentiates a cohesive grammatical unit from a random collection of sentences?
  • 3. Introduction:  Cohension and coherence are terms used in discourse analysis and text linguistics to describe the properties of written texts.  Advertising language tends not to use clear markers of cohesion, but is interpreted as being coherent.
  • 4. Definitions:  Coherence: The ways a text makes sense to readers & writer through the relevance and accessibility of its configuration of concepts, ideas and theories.  Cohesion: The grammatical and lexical relationship between different elements of a text which hold it together.
  • 5.  Coherence :  a semantic property of discourse formed through the interpretation of each individual sentence relative to the interpretation of other sentences, with "interpretation" implying interaction between the text, the reader and the writer.  a property that a reader will discern in the text  allows the reader to make sense of the text  refers to the semantic unity created between the ideas, sentences, paragraphs and sections of a piece of writing.
  • 6. Coherence vs. Cohesion Coherence: Cohesion:  very general principle of  formal linguistic features interpretation of language e.g repetition,reference in context  semantic relationships  fewer formal linguistic between sentences and features within sentences  determined by lexically e.g vocabulary choice and grammatically overt  relationships deal with intersentential text as a whole relationships  based on primarily semantic relationships  more recognizable  errors much more obvious
  • 7. Is it coherent or not?  The ancient Egyptians were masters of preserving dead people's bodies by making mummies of them. Mummies several thousand years old have been discovered nearly intact. The skin, hair, teeth, fingernails and toenails, and facial features of the mummies were evident. It is possible to diagnose the disease they suffered in life, such as smallpox, arthritis, and nutritional deficiencies. The process was remarkably effective. Sometimes apparent were the fatal afflictions of the dead people: a middle-aged king died from a blow on the head, and polio killed a child king. Mummification consisted of removing the internal organs, applying natural preservatives inside and out, and then wrapping the body in layers of bandages.
  • 8. Below is the same paragraph revised for coherence. Italics indicates pronouns and repeated key words, bold indicates transitional tag-words, and underlining indicates parallel structures.  The ancient Egyptians were masters of preserving dead people's bodies by making mummies of them. In short, mummification consisted of removing the internal organs, applying natural preservatives inside and out, and then wrapping the body in layers of bandages. And the process was remarkably effective. Indeed, mummies several thousand years old have been discovered nearly intact. Their skin, hair, teeth, fingernails and toenails, and facial features are still evident. Their diseases in life, such as smallpox, arthritis, and nutritional deficiencies, are still diagnosable. Even their fatal afflictions are still apparent: a middle-aged king died from a blow on the head; a child king died from polio.
  • 9. According to Halliday & Hasan, A text is a semantic unit whose parts are linked together by explicit cohesive ties. Cohesive tie: a semantic and /or lexico-grammatic relation between an element in text and some other element that is crucial to interpretetion of it.  Eventhough within-sentence ties occur the cohesive ties across ‘sentence boundaries’are those which allow sequences of sentences to be understood as text. Cohesion therefore defines a text as text.
  • 10. Halliday & Hasan identify general categories of cohesive devices that signal coherence in texts:  Reference  Ellipsis Grammatical  Substitution Cohesion  Conjunction  Lexical Cohesion
  • 11. Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of Cohesive Devices :  Reference : Replacement of words and expressions with pro- forms. e.g pronouns,pro-modifiers. Three types of reference:  Personal  Demonstrative  Comparative
  • 12. Cohesion consists in continuity of referential meaning (relatedness of reference) ; Personal (communication goal of referent) REFERENCE Demonstrative (proximity of referent) Comparative ( similarity to preceding referent)
  • 13. Types of reference: Personal Reference  a reference by means of person,  includes; Personal pronouns (e.g., I, he, she) Possesive pronouns (e.g., mine, hers, his) Possesive determiners (e.g., my, your, her) e.g. English is considered an international language. It is a spoken by more than 260 million people all over the world. They told me you had gone by her car
  • 14. Demonstrative Reference  essentially a form of verbal pointing  the speaker identifies the referent by locating it on a scale of proximity.  In general,  this, these and here imply proximity to the speaker;  that, those and there imply distance from the speaker.
  • 15. Demonstrative Reference  Like personals, the demonstratives regularly refer exophorically to something within the context of situaiton. e.g. How do you like a cruise in that yacht? Pick these up!
  • 16. Comparative Reference  contributes to textual cohesion by setting up a relation of contrast  expressed by such adjactives as same, identical, equal, adjectives in a comparative degree such as bigger,faster and adverbs such as identically, likewise, so, such etc. e.g. She has a similarly furnished room to mine. The little dog barked as noisily as the big one. They asked me three equally difficult questions.
  • 17. Halliday and Hasan call within text cohesive ties endophoric, and references, items outside the text exophoric : REFERENCE (Situational) (Textual) {EXO}{PHORA} { ENDO}{PHORA} IN(SIDE) OUT(SIDE) {ANA}{PHORA} {CATA}{PHORA }
  • 18. Halliday and Hasan call within text cohesive ties endophoric, e.g. Wash and core six cooking apples. Put them into a fireproof dish.  an example of an endophoric reference when them referred back to apples.  Reference signals to the reader what kind of information is to be retrieved. Them, therefore, signals to the reader that he or she needs to look back in the text to find its meaning.
  • 19. Anaphora (to preceding text) Endophora Cataphora (to following text) e.g. We went to Devon for a holiday. The people we stayed with had four children.The eldest girl was about nine.  The first the is cataphoric since there is no lexical relation between people and anything in the preceding sentence.  The second the is both cataphoric and anaphoric  Cataphoric: eldest defines girl,  Anaphoric: girl is related to children
  • 20. Halliday and Hasan call references, items outside the text exophoric : e.g. For he's a jolly good fellow And so say all of us.  As readers outside of this environment, we are unfamiliar with who the he is that is being referred to,  But, most likely, the people involved are aware of the he.  When the meaning is not explicit from the text itself, but is obvious to those in a particular situation. This is called exophoric reference.
  • 21. Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of Cohesive Devices :  Substitution : Replacement of one item by another. A relation in the wording rather than in the meaning.  somewhat different from reference in that another word takes the place of the thing that is being discussed.  Types of Substitution:  Nominal  Verbal  Clausal
  • 22.  Whereas reference is a relation between meanings, substitution is a grammatical relationship : Types of Cohesive Relation Linguistic Level Reference Semantic Substitution (including Ellipsis) Grammatical
  • 23. Types of Substitution  Nominal Substitution:  Nominal substitutes ;  for noun head : one/ ones for nominal complement : the same for attribute : so e.g. John seems to be intelligent. –Is he really so?
  • 24.  Nominal Substitution:  The pronoun one is often used in nominal references. e.g. Let's go and see the bears. The polar ones are over on that rock.  In this sentence, ones is taking the place of bears in the previous sentence. e.g. Winter is often so damp. The same is true for the summer.
  • 25.  Verbal Substitution:  The verbal substitute in English is do.  Verbal substitutes ;  for verb : do, be , have  for process : do the same /likewise  for proposition : do so, be so e.g. The words did not come to the same as they used to do. e.g. I finally called on him. I have wanted to do (so) for a long time.
  • 26.  Clausal Substitution:  The clausal substitutes ;  for positive : so  for negative : not  In clausal substitution the entire clause is presupposed, and the contrasting element is outside the clause.
  • 27.  Clausal Substitution: e.g. Is there going to be an earthquake? It says so.  so presupposes the whole of the clause there’s going to be an earthquake and contrastive environment is provided by the says which is outside it. e.g. Has everyone gone home? I hope not.
  • 28. Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of Cohesive Devices :  Ellipsis : Deletion of words, expressions or phrases, Simply ‘substitution by zero’.  Types of Ellipsis:  Nominal  Verbal  Clausal
  • 29. Types of Ellipsis Nominal Ellipsis :  ellipsis within the nominal group. e.g. Here are thirteen cards. Take any (-).Now give me any three (-). e.g. Some say one thing, others say another (-). e.g. Which hat will you wear ? This is the best (-). e.g. Have another chocolate. No thanks; that was my third (-). e.g. Smith was the first person to leave. I was the second (-).
  • 30. Verbal Ellipsis :  ellipsis within the verbal group. e.g. Have you been swimming? Yes, I have. e.g. What have you been doing? Swimming. e.g. Is he complaining? He may be; I don’t care. e.g. I haven’t finished it yet. I hope you’re going to have by tomorrow. e.g. Some were laughing and others cyring. e.g. Were you laughing? No I wasn’t. e.g. John came, did not he? NO, but he will.
  • 31. Clausal Ellipsis :  ellipsis in which an entire clause is elided from a sentence. e.g. Smith was going to take part but somebody telephoned and asked to see him urgently so he had to withdraw.- Who ? e.g. I kept quiet because Mary gets embarrassed if anyone mentions about John’s name. I don’t know why. e.g. Who could have broken those tiles?- I can’t think who.
  • 32. Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of Cohesive Devices :  Conjunctions : a word or group of words used to connect words, phrases, or clauses. • mark certain relationsips between clauses and sentences Four categories:  Additive  Adversative  Causal  Temporal
  • 33. Categories of Conjunction  Examples : For the whole day he climbed up the steep mountainnside, almost without stopping. And in all this time he met no one. ►Additive Yet he was hardly aware of being tired. ►Adversative So by the night time the valley was far below him.► Causal Then, as dusk fell, he sat down to rest. ►Temporal
  • 34. Types of Conjunction Additive type  The additive is a kind of conjunctive relation which is closer to coordination.  Additive words are such as and, also, nor, or else, moreover, in addition, besides, by the way, that is, likewise, similarly, conversely, thus, for instance. e.g. My client says he does not know his witness. Further, he denies ever having seen her. e.g. Perhaps she missed her train. Or else she’s changed her mind and isn’t coming.
  • 35. Types of Conjunction Adversative type  The basic meaning of the adversative relation is ‘contrary to expectation’.  Adversative words are such as yet, but, however, despite this, on the other hand, in fact, instead, either way, anyhow, nevertheless, rather etc. e.g. All the figures were correct; they’d been checked. Yet the total came out wrong. e.g. We maybe back tonight; I’m not sure. Either way, just make yourself at home.
  • 36. Types of Conjunction Causal type  Causal relation involves primarily reason, result and purpose relations between the sentences.  Causal words are such as so, thus, hence, therefore, arising out of this, in that case, otherwise, because, as a result (of this), on this basis, accordingly. e.g. You are not leaving, are you? Because I’ve got something to say to you. e.g. I was not informed. Otherwise I should have taken some action.
  • 37. Types of Conjunction Temporal type  The relation between two successive sentences.  Conjunctions of this type are such as then, next, afterward, previously, finally, at last, meanwhile, next day, first, from now on, to sum up, in short, henceforward, hitherto, up to now, this time etc. e.g. The weather cleared just as the party approached the summit. Until then they had been nothing of the panaroma around them. e.g. At last, he finished the rehersal for his role.
  • 38. Coordination CONJUNCTIONS Subordination  Coordinating conjunctions  Subordinating conjunctions connect words, phrases, or connect clauses that are of clauses of equal grammatical subordinate importance to the rank. independent clause or to  For, and, nor, but, or, yet, so some element in the main clause. e.g. I used phonics in learning to  although, except, though, read, and so did you. while, if, whether as, as if, e.g. Though he seemed to be where, wherever, in order tired, he did not refused to go that, so that, after, as long as, out. as soon as, before, since, when etc.
  • 39. Halliday & Hasan's Taxonomy of Cohesive Devices :  Lexical Cohesion : achieved by the selection of vocabulary.  Types of Lexical Cohesion :  Reiteration  Collocation
  • 40. Types of Lexical Cohesion  Reiteration :  a form of lexical cohesion which involves repetition, synonym or near synonym,superordinate and a general noun. e.g. Pollution of our environment has occurred for centuries, but it has become a significant health problem only within the last century. Atmospheric pollution contributes to respiratory disease, and to lung cancer in particular. Other health problems directly related to air pollutants include heart disease, eye irritation and so on. Repetition
  • 41.  Reiteration : e.g. Henry’s has bought a new jaguar. He practically lives in the car.  Superordinate e.g. I turned to the ascent of the peak.The climb is perfectly is easy.  Synonym e.g. I turned to the ascent of the peak. The thing is perfectly is easy.  General noun e.g. There is a boy climbing that tree. The lad is going to fall if he doesn’t take care.  Near -Synonym
  • 42.  Collocation :  Cohesion that is achieved through the association of lexical items that regularly co-occur.  These lexical items or words tend to occur in similar environments.  For instance; hair/comb, reader/writer, door/window, chair/table, north/south, peace/war, bee/honey etc. e.g. Why does this little boy wriggle all the time? Girl don’t wriggle.
  • 43. Analysis of Coherence  Hello, James Gleick," said Amazon.com the other day (click here if you’re someone else). "Take a peek at your brand new music recommendations." I peeked. Amazon’s computers predicted that I would like the Beastie Boys, Adiemus, Frank Sinatra, Harvey Danger, and the Dave Matthews Band. What an impressive list! All right, I don’t actually care for any of these, but still. It was quite a shot in the dark, considering I’d never been to Amazon’s music department before. This is the way it’s going on the Internet: if marketers want your money and your time and your "eyeballs," they feel they should figure out who you are and what you like.
  • 44. Analysis of Coherence:  Repetition of : peek  Repetition of pronoun: I  Pronoun reference: these  Transitional tag: but still  Pronoun reference: it , this  Repetition and parallel form : your money and your time and your eyeballs  Pronoun reference : they and you  Parallel form: who you are and what you like
  • 45. Analysis of Coherence  Late in the early morning hours, in a Spanish cafe, an old man drinks brandy. A young waiter is angry; he wishes that the old man would leave so that he and an older waiter could close the cafe and go home. He insults the deaf old man and is painfully indifferent to the older waiter’s feelings when he states that “an old man is a nasty thing.” The older waiter, however, realizes that the old man drinking brandy after brandy is not nasty; he is only lonely. No doubt, that’s the reason why the old man tried to hang himself last week. When the old man leaves, the waiters close the cafe.
  • 46. References:  Halliday & Hasan (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman. London & Newyork.  Hyland, K. (2006). English for Academic Purposes. Routledge, Great Britain.  Reid, J.M. The Process of Composition. Second Edition. Prentice Hall Regents.  http://www.hku.hk/linguist/cou/adv. Retrieved 9th May, 2007.  http://grammar.ccc.commnet.edu/grammar/transitions.htm. Retrieved 9th May, 2007.  http://home.eserver.org/danzico/Discourse/hallidaysummary.html. Retrieved 11th May, 2007.  http://www.jstor.org. Retrieved 9th May, 2007.  www.gpc.edu/~lawowl/handouts/conjunctions.pdf. Retrieved 9th May, 2007.  http://www.cliffsnotes.com. Retrieved 11th May, 2007.