This document discusses the structure and content of an evidence pack and expert advisory group to support a citizens assembly on greening the borough.
It outlines the sections to be included in the evidence pack such as context, challenges, opportunities, and lessons learned. It also discusses sourcing evidence from different sectors and reflecting various learning styles.
The role of experts is described as bringing evidence to life through unique insights and perspectives. A long list of potential local, national, and international experts from sectors like councils, organizations, investors, and universities is provided.
Finally, the document explains that the advisory group will provide knowledge on levers from different sectors to inform recommendations. It suggests roles and organizations to invite to the advisory group
Putting people at the heart of everything we do is a key strategic principle for Newham Council. It is committed to better involving residents because working together with our communities achieves better services and outcomes and makes the borough a happier and healthier place to live.
We set up a Democracy and Civic Participation Commission in 2020 to enable democracy in the borough to become more representative and participatory and to look at alternative governance models for the council.
We established the UK’s first permanent citizens assembly and one of the country’s largest participatory budgeting programmes to support our residents to be “policy makers” and “budget makers”
We also mobilised pioneering alliances to “co-produce” with residents and partners, setting Help Newham to mobilise staff and residents to provide emergency support during the pandemic, and the Newham Social Welfare Alliance which brings together frontline partners to support residents at risk of crisis.
We set up Health Champions to engage residents to protect themselves from Covid, now leading a national network, and are training residents to carry out research in their communities as part of the UK’s first longitudinal programme through community-led research.
Setting the context on Newham
Working with residents to improve their communities
Learning lessons from involving residents in policymaking
Developing people’s participation & policy design skills
Areas for discussion
Nurturing innovation through collaboration and technologyNoel Hatch
Sharing knowledge to work better and improve how we scale up innovation. Empowering the public through the power of information and collaboration to broker innovation.
In this State of the Borough, we share an:
Introduction setting the scene
Overview of the challenges the borough faces, the progress we’ve made and delivery we’re planning next
The appendix outlines
Evidence that underpins work on each of the pillars for Towards a Better Newham
Case studies of what we have done as a council to tackle the challenges
Stories from residents who have benefited from these activities
Commitments we have made on what we will deliver going forwards
Putting people at the heart of everything we do is a key strategic principle for Newham Council. It is committed to better involving residents because working together with our communities achieves better services and outcomes and makes the borough a happier and healthier place to live.
We set up a Democracy and Civic Participation Commission in 2020 to enable democracy in the borough to become more representative and participatory and to look at alternative governance models for the council.
We established the UK’s first permanent citizens assembly and one of the country’s largest participatory budgeting programmes to support our residents to be “policy makers” and “budget makers”
We also mobilised pioneering alliances to “co-produce” with residents and partners, setting Help Newham to mobilise staff and residents to provide emergency support during the pandemic, and the Newham Social Welfare Alliance which brings together frontline partners to support residents at risk of crisis.
We set up Health Champions to engage residents to protect themselves from Covid, now leading a national network, and are training residents to carry out research in their communities as part of the UK’s first longitudinal programme through community-led research.
Setting the context on Newham
Working with residents to improve their communities
Learning lessons from involving residents in policymaking
Developing people’s participation & policy design skills
Areas for discussion
Nurturing innovation through collaboration and technologyNoel Hatch
Sharing knowledge to work better and improve how we scale up innovation. Empowering the public through the power of information and collaboration to broker innovation.
In this State of the Borough, we share an:
Introduction setting the scene
Overview of the challenges the borough faces, the progress we’ve made and delivery we’re planning next
The appendix outlines
Evidence that underpins work on each of the pillars for Towards a Better Newham
Case studies of what we have done as a council to tackle the challenges
Stories from residents who have benefited from these activities
Commitments we have made on what we will deliver going forwards
Every Voice Counts: ASAN's Community Based Research Projectpodnosh
How the All Saints Action Network benefited NI4 (percentage of people who feel they can influence decisions in their locality).
Project engaged with community based practitioners across the West Midlands.
Encourage their involvement in issues which affect their communities
Work with them to identify ways of making their work more effective through providing tailored packages of training and support
Through the above assist them in making their work more sustainable
Full notes from a presentation on User-Led Organisations. This was done at the NCASC 2012 in Eastbourne, done jointly with research in practice for adults and the Strengthening DPULOs Programme.
The presentation was a workshop at Evolve 2014: the annual event for the voluntary sector in London on Monday 16 June 2014.
This presentation was chaired by Terry Perkins, Development Officer (NAVCA).
Find out more about the Evolve Conference from NCVO: http://www.ncvo.org.uk/training-and-events/evolve-conference
Find out more about the work NCVO does around funding: http://www.ncvo.org.uk/practical-support/funding
Responding to the Inquiry into Health Inequality in the North of England (whose recommendations and findings were published in 'Due North'), VSNW are consulting on how the voluntary and community sector can play a bigger role.
This introduction to Nesta’s work on digital democracy was shared with the Kirklees Democracy Commission as part of our evidence gathering in September 2016.
Every Voice Counts: ASAN's Community Based Research Projectpodnosh
How the All Saints Action Network benefited NI4 (percentage of people who feel they can influence decisions in their locality).
Project engaged with community based practitioners across the West Midlands.
Encourage their involvement in issues which affect their communities
Work with them to identify ways of making their work more effective through providing tailored packages of training and support
Through the above assist them in making their work more sustainable
Full notes from a presentation on User-Led Organisations. This was done at the NCASC 2012 in Eastbourne, done jointly with research in practice for adults and the Strengthening DPULOs Programme.
The presentation was a workshop at Evolve 2014: the annual event for the voluntary sector in London on Monday 16 June 2014.
This presentation was chaired by Terry Perkins, Development Officer (NAVCA).
Find out more about the Evolve Conference from NCVO: http://www.ncvo.org.uk/training-and-events/evolve-conference
Find out more about the work NCVO does around funding: http://www.ncvo.org.uk/practical-support/funding
Responding to the Inquiry into Health Inequality in the North of England (whose recommendations and findings were published in 'Due North'), VSNW are consulting on how the voluntary and community sector can play a bigger role.
This introduction to Nesta’s work on digital democracy was shared with the Kirklees Democracy Commission as part of our evidence gathering in September 2016.
User engagement research final report - final, july 2012Rich Watts
Since March, ecdp has been working with our members and other disabled and older people from across Essex and with a variety of lived experience, to understand how views of health and social care can be effectively captured. In total we engaged directly with 121 people for this work and indirectly engaged with over 470 people and 21 organisations. We also distributed almost 1,000 separate pieces of promotional material to other stakeholders across the county.
This is the final report of this research, which was presented to HealthWatch Essex in July 2012.
For more information, please visit www.ecdp.org.uk
Discovering The Value Of Social Networks and Communities of PracticeCollabor8now Ltd
There has been much written about measuring the value of online communities such as Social Networks or Communities of Practice. However, most pundits tend to think of measuring value from a purely financial perspective, i.e. the Return on Investment (ROI). Clearly this is an important factor, but it’s not the only factor that should be considered
Slides from NHS Citizen Research Workshop convened on the 7th of April 2015 at the University of Westminster to discuss the Research Hub, a brand new element of the NHS Citizen design intended to support wider research and knowledge sharing.
The aim of the workshop was to explore possible research questions and projects and this presentation introduces what NHS Citizen research might look like in its different forms.
A conference presentation on post-project evaluation in international development. Given at Dutch Wageningen University's Monitoring and Evaluation Conference 3/15
Whole systems change across a neighbourhood
How can we collaborate with people to help them build their resilience? Get under the skin of the culture and the lives people live. Identify people’s feelings and experiences of community and understand what people think is shaped by different values and by the environment and infrastructure around them. The future of collaboration could bring many opportunities but people find it more difficult to live and act together than before. How can we help people…and communities build their resilience? Understand people’s different situations and capabilities to develop pathways that help them build resilient relationships. Help people experience and practice change together. Help people grow everyday practices into sustainable projects. Turn people’s everyday motivations into design principles. Support infrastructure that connects different cultures of collaboration. Build relationships with people designing in collaboration for the future…now.
Together with the the Democratic Society, we were commissioned by Government Digital Service (GDS) to undertake a 6-week discovery project to explore how the process of online consultations, as delivered by central government, could be improved.
This case study focusses on what we recommended, how our different approaches made our collaboration stronger, and our shared view on the future of citizen engagement.
Emma Parnell and Michelle Brook presented this talk during the Service Design in Government conference.
Barry Fong, Principal Social Policy Analyst at the Greater London Authority (GLA) will take us through the Survey of Londoners 2021-22. Conducted at the end of 2021, so just before the full effects of the cost-of-living crisis began to set in, it was commissioned to provide vital evidence on key social outcomes for Londoners, following the onset of COVID-19 and associated restrictions.
A similar survey was conducted in 2018-19, so this survey would show how things had changed in the capital since then.
Barry will go through some of the key findings from the survey before handing over to Michael Cheetham and Ellen Bloomer from the North East London Integrated Care Board, who collaborated with local authority partners to fund a sample boost for the survey within North East London. They will explain how they used the data, including the analyses, the results and how this impacted strategy and practice.
Barry Fong, Principal Social Policy Analyst at the Greater London Authority (GLA) will take us through the Survey of Londoners 2021-22. Conducted at the end of 2021, so just before the full effects of the cost-of-living crisis began to set in, it was commissioned to provide vital evidence on key social outcomes for Londoners, following the onset of COVID-19 and associated restrictions.
A similar survey was conducted in 2018-19, so this survey would show how things had changed in the capital since then.
Barry will go through some of the key findings from the survey before handing over to Michael Cheetham and Ellen Bloomer from the North East London Integrated Care Board, who collaborated with local authority partners to fund a sample boost for the survey within North East London. They will explain how they used the data, including the analyses, the results and how this impacted strategy and practice.
How can humanities research contribute to policy 2Noel Hatch
There is always a danger that the humanities are overlooked in favour of the social sciences or ‘hard’ sciences in research-policy engagement, when the former have an important role to play.
The session will provide case studies and a facilitated discussion to better understand the potential implications and challenges for policymakers of engaging with humanities researchers.
The London Strategy and Policy Network and the London Research and Policy Partnership invite you to join a session to explore the contributions that humanities research can make to policy by bringing together humanities researchers and policymakers from across the capital and beyond.
Welcome and introduction (1:00 – 1:10pm)
Chaired by:
Professor Ben Rogers, Professor of Practice, University of London & Bloomberg Fellow to LSE Cities
Overview: How can humanists and policymakers work together? Benefits and opportunities of humanities research and policy engagement (1:10 – 1:20pm)
Presented by:
Jo Fox, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Research & Engagement) & Dean, School of Advanced Study, University of London.
Case study 1: Lessons from ‘The Pandemic and Beyond: the Arts and Humanities Contribution to Covid Research and Recovery (1:20 – 1:30pm)
Presented by:
Pascale Aebischer, Professor of Shakespeare and Early Modern Performance Studies, University of Exeter and PI of The Pandemic and Beyond: the Arts and Humanities Contribution to Covid Research and Recovery, University of Exeter.
Case study 2: Place-making, diversity and co-production: making visible the layers of London (1:30 – 1:40pm)
Presented by:
Justin Colston, Senior Lecturer at Institute of Historical Research, University of London.
Q & A / Discussion (1:40 - 1:55pm)
Closing remarks (1:55 - 2pm)
ABOUT LRaPP:
London Research and Policy Partnership (LRaPP) is a new partnership aimed at promoting greater synergy between London government and the academic research community.
The Partnership is evolving among movements bringing universities and local communities, cities and regions closer together - the ‘civic universities agenda’. It encourages universities to use their expertise and organisational resources to address pressing public policy challenges.
There are many examples of London's academics and public sector working together. Yet, most of these relationships develop in an ad hoc way. LRaPP takes a systematic approach through proactive and sustained engagement between the university and government sectors.
London Strategy and Policy Network
This network brings together people working in policy & strategy working in local government across London to learn new insights on cross-cutting issues and new methods in how to develop insight, policy, strategy & change.
This helps them support their organisations make sense of how to tackle issues which cut across various services and that require a whole system approach across local places to tackle.
How can humanities research contribute to policy 1Noel Hatch
There is always a danger that the humanities are overlooked in favour of the social sciences or ‘hard’ sciences in research-policy engagement, when the former have an important role to play.
The session will provide case studies and a facilitated discussion to better understand the potential implications and challenges for policymakers of engaging with humanities researchers.
The London Strategy and Policy Network and the London Research and Policy Partnership invite you to join a session to explore the contributions that humanities research can make to policy by bringing together humanities researchers and policymakers from across the capital and beyond.
Welcome and introduction (1:00 – 1:10pm)
Chaired by:
Professor Ben Rogers, Professor of Practice, University of London & Bloomberg Fellow to LSE Cities
Overview: How can humanists and policymakers work together? Benefits and opportunities of humanities research and policy engagement (1:10 – 1:20pm)
Presented by:
Jo Fox, Pro Vice-Chancellor (Research & Engagement) & Dean, School of Advanced Study, University of London.
Case study 1: Lessons from ‘The Pandemic and Beyond: the Arts and Humanities Contribution to Covid Research and Recovery (1:20 – 1:30pm)
Presented by:
Pascale Aebischer, Professor of Shakespeare and Early Modern Performance Studies, University of Exeter and PI of The Pandemic and Beyond: the Arts and Humanities Contribution to Covid Research and Recovery, University of Exeter.
Case study 2: Place-making, diversity and co-production: making visible the layers of London (1:30 – 1:40pm)
Presented by:
Justin Colston, Senior Lecturer at Institute of Historical Research, University of London.
Q & A / Discussion (1:40 - 1:55pm)
Closing remarks (1:55 - 2pm)
ABOUT LRaPP:
London Research and Policy Partnership (LRaPP) is a new partnership aimed at promoting greater synergy between London government and the academic research community.
The Partnership is evolving among movements bringing universities and local communities, cities and regions closer together - the ‘civic universities agenda’. It encourages universities to use their expertise and organisational resources to address pressing public policy challenges.
There are many examples of London's academics and public sector working together. Yet, most of these relationships develop in an ad hoc way. LRaPP takes a systematic approach through proactive and sustained engagement between the university and government sectors.
London Strategy and Policy Network
This network brings together people working in policy & strategy working in local government across London to learn new insights on cross-cutting issues and new methods in how to develop insight, policy, strategy & change.
This helps them support their organisations make sense of how to tackle issues which cut across various services and that require a whole system approach across local places to tackle.
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
2. 1.Structure for the evidence pack
• The evidence pack will enable residents to
understand better the issue of greening the
borough through evidence specific to that theme
and contextual information that helps them
understand the wider landscape this is in, both at
a Newham and national level.
• It will start with the wider context and then focus
in on the issue itself.
• To ensure the pack is both concise & meaningful
for residents, for each section there will be an
overview, how it relates to the issue and links to
evidence published online.
• Where the evidence hasn’t been published
online, it can be briefly summarised in the
evidence pack.
• The Senior Leadership Team were invited to
crowdsource evidence on each of these areas.
Demographics
Socio-
economic
context
Challenges &
opportunities
Levers to
influence
Lived
experience
Activities
delivered
Lessons
learned
Future
scenarios
3. What levers can we use to influence the
issue?
What can each
sector do?
Residents
Businesses
Public
Service
Partners
Council
Government
Others
4. What norms influence people’s behaviours
around the issue?
• While different sectors &
organisations have specific levers
they can use, there are also norms
• Norms can have a significant
influence on people’s behaviours
around an issue
• What insights do we have about
people’s norms & behaviours when
it comes to greening the borough?
5. What evidence can we share that reflects
people’s different learning styles?
• People learn in different ways – not
just through test
• We want the evidence to reflect
those different styles
• That could include data, strategies,
stories, videos, art, etc.
• It could be from services, frontline
staff, residents, government,
funders, networks, etc.
6. 2. Experts
• Residents will be able to make sense of the evidence
we share
• They will also be able to listen & engage with experts
who will bring evidence to life
• We see experts as people who can bring unique
insights into the issue, from any walk of life
• We want a diversity of experts who can share different
perspectives, and can help inspire residents
• Who can provide the local evidence base and what’s being
delivered
• Who can provide the evidence base nationally or
internationally
• Who can show inspiration in terms of delivery from outside
the borough
• On the following is a longlist of experts following
feedback
• What experts would you recommend we invite?
Challenges &
opportunities
Levers to
influence
Lived
experience
Activities
delivered
Lessons
learned
Future
scenarios
7. Innovative councils on the issue
Belfast Healthy
City
Bogota
Children's
Priority Zones
Ghent City
Council
Bournemouth
Parks
Foundation
Leeds City
Council
Aberdeen City
Council
Paris City
Council
Stockholm City
Council
Councils funded
by Future Parks
Accelerator
Bryant Parks
Foundation (US)
Phoenix Parks
Foundation (US)
Namba Parks,
Osaka
8. Organisations working on green & blue
spaces – parks, rivers & canals
Keep Britain
Tidy/Green Flag
Parks
Community UK
Good Gym Park Run Woodland Trust
Wild in the City
National Youth
Agency’s Future
Proof Parks
Groundwork Fields in Trust
High Line
Network
Eden Project
Landscape
Institute
Beyond Green
Space
Canals & Rivers
Trust
UCL Centre for
Advanced
Spatial Analysis
9. Organisations working on urban
environments
C40
Design
Council
Impact on
Urban Health
Forum for
the Future
Wild in the
City
Shared
Assets
Vinnova Arup
Royal College
of Art Design
Central Saint
Martins
RSA Heritage
Friends of
the Earth
LGA
Transition
Towns
Incredible
Edible
Forum for
the Future
10. Relevant investors & funders
National Trust
NESTA Future
Parks
Accelerator
National Lottery
Heritage Fund
National Lottery
Community
Fund
Big Local
Power to
Change
Wellcome Trust Lankelly Chase
City & Guilds
Foundation
Foundation for
Future London
11. Role of the Advisory Group
The Advisory Group is made both of local stakeholders who can bring knowledge of the borough and regional / national stakeholders
who can bring their knowledge of their sector.
The members of the Advisory Group help ensure that the citizens assembly considers the different levers that their sectors have, both
within the borough and at a regional & national level. The roles we would invite would be head of service level working in
partnerships, place making or engagement, so they have sufficient understand on the levers their organisation/sector has.
They will do this both before the assembly starts with a session where they review the evidence to be provided and in later sessions
to ensure recommendations developed consider the different levers and sectors that can play a role to tackle the issue.
For those members of the group who can’t attend meetings, they will be invited to submit comments and views in advance and these
will be presented to the rest of the group. The group will be facilitated by DemSoc & Involve.
The group doesn’t have any decision making powers, either on behalf of the council or the assembly. The group also doesn’t present
evidence itself to assembly participants, which is done instead by both internal and external experts individually. The group doesn’t
have any delivery responsibilities. The delivery of the assembly is the responsibility of DemSoc & Involve, supported by the Council.
12. Potential advisory group
Newham Citizens
UK
Newham United
Dialogue
Compost (Newham
VCS Infrastructure
Body)
East London
Business Alliance
Royal Docks
Enterprise Zone
Barts Health Trust
or CCG
GLA UCL Police Populo
City of London
(West Ham Park)
Lea Valley Park
Authority
Parks for London LLDC (QE2 Park)
In selecting the advisory group, we are aiming for anchor institutions with a balance across the civil society &
faith sector, business sector & public sector within Newham, as well as selected London-wide organisations.
UCL, LLDC and City of London are selected because of their strong influence in Newham. In light blue, are
organisations who have specific delivery responsibilities on parks & open spaces in Newham.
Editor's Notes
Share evidence and ideas you have of experts we can present to assembly participants
Evidence that shows
Challenges & opportunities around the theme
Lived experience from communities & frontline staff
What has been delivered or planned to be delivered
What levers are within and outside of the council’s control
What levers other organisations & communities have
Share evidence and ideas you have of experts we can present to assembly participants
Evidence that shows
Challenges & opportunities around the theme
Lived experience from communities & frontline staff
What has been delivered or planned to be delivered
What levers are within and outside of the council’s control
What levers other organisations & communities have
Share evidence and ideas you have of experts we can present to assembly participants
Evidence that shows
Challenges & opportunities around the theme
Lived experience from communities & frontline staff
What has been delivered or planned to be delivered
What levers are within and outside of the council’s control
What levers other organisations & communities have
Share evidence and ideas you have of experts we can present to assembly participants
Evidence that shows
Challenges & opportunities around the theme
Lived experience from communities & frontline staff
What has been delivered or planned to be delivered
What levers are within and outside of the council’s control
What levers other organisations & communities have
Share evidence and ideas you have of experts we can present to assembly participants
Evidence that shows
Challenges & opportunities around the theme
Lived experience from communities & frontline staff
What has been delivered or planned to be delivered
What levers are within and outside of the council’s control
What levers other organisations & communities have
Victoria Bradford-Keegan, Delivery Director, National Trust (led Future Parks Accelerator)
Drew Bennellick, National Lottery Heritage Fund
Tony Thapar, from The National Lottery Community Fund
Design Council (Cat Drew – Noel to contact)
LLDC
Parks for London
Green Flag
Victoria Bradford-Keegan, Delivery Director, National Trust (led Future Parks Accelerator)
Drew Bennellick, National Lottery Heritage Fund
Tony Thapar, from The National Lottery Community Fund
Design Council (Cat Drew – Noel to contact)
LLDC
Parks for London
Green Flag
Victoria Bradford-Keegan, Delivery Director, National Trust (led Future Parks Accelerator)
Drew Bennellick, National Lottery Heritage Fund
Tony Thapar, from The National Lottery Community Fund
Design Council (Cat Drew – Noel to contact)
LLDC
Parks for London
Green Flag
James Jukwey (Newham Citizens UK), Kelvin Abdul Kareem Jones (Newham United Dialogue – Interfaith), Compost, ELBA & RDEZ (check with Ellie Thomas), Barts Health Trust (Andrew Attfield), Centre for London (Rob Whitehead), NESTA (), CCG (check with Public Health), Big Lottery Fund (Cassie Robinson), UCL (Michael Reynier)