The role of the literature review Your literature review gives y.docxoreo10
The document provides guidance for writing a literature review section of a dissertation or research paper. It discusses the key components and purpose of a literature review, including synthesizing previous scholarly research to identify trends, gaps, and how the proposed study will contribute new knowledge. The literature review should be comprehensive by searching multiple databases and sources, critically analyze and synthesize the findings of previous studies rather than just summarizing individual sources, and identify the gap in knowledge that the current study aims to address.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review. It defines a literature review as a discussion of published information on a particular subject that may constitute a chapter in a thesis or dissertation. The purpose is to place works in their proper context and relationship to one another, resolve conflicts, identify gaps, and point to further research needs. When writing, the literature review should be organized, assess sources objectively, and draw conclusions on their contributions and arguments while using evidence from the sources. The document outlines a process of clarifying the assignment, finding models, considering source currency, developing a focus and thesis, and revising through summarizing, synthesizing and citing sources accurately.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing and summarizing previous research on a topic to place one's own work in context. The document outlines the components and purpose of a literature review, including establishing the background and significance of a research problem and identifying gaps in previous research. It recommends searching widely on a topic, evaluating sources critically, and organizing the review with a clear focus and structure. The document emphasizes using evidence from sources to support an argument, and revising the review thoroughly to present information concisely and address the intended audience.
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It outlines that a literature review critically evaluates prior research relevant to the topic. It should identify what is already known about the research problem and can point out effective and ineffective research strategies. The review should be focused on studies closely related to the research problem. Both qualitative and quantitative researchers may construct literature reviews, but qualitative researchers are more likely to do so after starting their study. The document provides tips for searching literature, evaluating sources, summarizing information, organizing the review, and writing it in an effective manner.
This document provides guidance on producing a literature review. It defines a literature review as a paper that compiles, outlines, and evaluates previously established research and relates it to the author's own thesis. The document is divided into six sections that cover general information about literature reviews, the process for completing one, common organizational structures, formats, a checklist, and resources. It emphasizes establishing a clear thesis, logically organizing information, and critically analyzing sources to draw comparisons that support the thesis.
This document provides guidance on conducting and writing a literature review. It discusses the purpose of a literature review in analyzing and critically evaluating previous research on a topic. The document offers tips for finding relevant sources, narrowing a topic, developing a thesis statement, and organizing a literature review. It provides direction on what to include in writing a literature review such as summarizing previous findings, identifying gaps, and making recommendations for further research.
This document provides guidance on conducting and writing a literature review. It discusses defining the purpose and scope of the review, searching for relevant literature, evaluating sources critically, organizing the review, and writing in a clear and concise manner. The key steps outlined include clarifying the assignment, finding models, narrowing the topic, considering source currency and focus, developing a thesis statement, and determining an effective structure with headings. When reviewing sources, the document advises assessing provenance, objectivity, persuasiveness, and value. It also offers tips for creating a well-formatted review with proper layout, language usage, and transitions between ideas.
This document provides guidance for students on completing a dissertation module. It outlines the aims of allowing independent study and in-depth investigation of a topic. It discusses techniques for literature searching and reviewing primary sources. The dissertation layout involves 4 main sections - an introduction, literature review, discussion, and references. The literature review section requires appraisal of 6-8 primary sources less than 10 years old using a critique framework. It emphasizes comprehensive literature searching and critical analysis of methodologies. Overall recommendations and areas for further research must be provided based on findings. Guidance is given on literature searching strategies, evaluating sources, and referencing.
The role of the literature review Your literature review gives y.docxoreo10
The document provides guidance for writing a literature review section of a dissertation or research paper. It discusses the key components and purpose of a literature review, including synthesizing previous scholarly research to identify trends, gaps, and how the proposed study will contribute new knowledge. The literature review should be comprehensive by searching multiple databases and sources, critically analyze and synthesize the findings of previous studies rather than just summarizing individual sources, and identify the gap in knowledge that the current study aims to address.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review. It defines a literature review as a discussion of published information on a particular subject that may constitute a chapter in a thesis or dissertation. The purpose is to place works in their proper context and relationship to one another, resolve conflicts, identify gaps, and point to further research needs. When writing, the literature review should be organized, assess sources objectively, and draw conclusions on their contributions and arguments while using evidence from the sources. The document outlines a process of clarifying the assignment, finding models, considering source currency, developing a focus and thesis, and revising through summarizing, synthesizing and citing sources accurately.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing and summarizing previous research on a topic to place one's own work in context. The document outlines the components and purpose of a literature review, including establishing the background and significance of a research problem and identifying gaps in previous research. It recommends searching widely on a topic, evaluating sources critically, and organizing the review with a clear focus and structure. The document emphasizes using evidence from sources to support an argument, and revising the review thoroughly to present information concisely and address the intended audience.
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It outlines that a literature review critically evaluates prior research relevant to the topic. It should identify what is already known about the research problem and can point out effective and ineffective research strategies. The review should be focused on studies closely related to the research problem. Both qualitative and quantitative researchers may construct literature reviews, but qualitative researchers are more likely to do so after starting their study. The document provides tips for searching literature, evaluating sources, summarizing information, organizing the review, and writing it in an effective manner.
This document provides guidance on producing a literature review. It defines a literature review as a paper that compiles, outlines, and evaluates previously established research and relates it to the author's own thesis. The document is divided into six sections that cover general information about literature reviews, the process for completing one, common organizational structures, formats, a checklist, and resources. It emphasizes establishing a clear thesis, logically organizing information, and critically analyzing sources to draw comparisons that support the thesis.
This document provides guidance on conducting and writing a literature review. It discusses the purpose of a literature review in analyzing and critically evaluating previous research on a topic. The document offers tips for finding relevant sources, narrowing a topic, developing a thesis statement, and organizing a literature review. It provides direction on what to include in writing a literature review such as summarizing previous findings, identifying gaps, and making recommendations for further research.
This document provides guidance on conducting and writing a literature review. It discusses defining the purpose and scope of the review, searching for relevant literature, evaluating sources critically, organizing the review, and writing in a clear and concise manner. The key steps outlined include clarifying the assignment, finding models, narrowing the topic, considering source currency and focus, developing a thesis statement, and determining an effective structure with headings. When reviewing sources, the document advises assessing provenance, objectivity, persuasiveness, and value. It also offers tips for creating a well-formatted review with proper layout, language usage, and transitions between ideas.
This document provides guidance for students on completing a dissertation module. It outlines the aims of allowing independent study and in-depth investigation of a topic. It discusses techniques for literature searching and reviewing primary sources. The dissertation layout involves 4 main sections - an introduction, literature review, discussion, and references. The literature review section requires appraisal of 6-8 primary sources less than 10 years old using a critique framework. It emphasizes comprehensive literature searching and critical analysis of methodologies. Overall recommendations and areas for further research must be provided based on findings. Guidance is given on literature searching strategies, evaluating sources, and referencing.
A literature review is a critical summary of all the published works on a particular topic. Most research papers include a section on literature review as part of the introduction. However, a literature review can also be published as a standalone article. These slides will help you grasp the basics of writing a literature review.
Research is "creative and systematic work undertaken to increase the stock of knowledge". It involves the collection, organization and analysis of evidence to increase understanding of a topic, characterized by a particular attentiveness to controlling sources of bias and error.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review. It defines a literature review as an analysis and synthesis of previous research on a topic. The purpose is to place one's own research in the context of existing literature and identify areas that need further study. The document outlines the components of a literature review, including defining the problem, searching relevant literature, evaluating sources, and analyzing findings. It also provides tips for writing such as developing a thesis, considering organization, using evidence from sources, and revising. The concluding sections emphasize the importance of thoroughly understanding sources and ensuring the literature review relates directly to the research topic.
The document provides guidance on writing a literature review. It explains that a literature review goes beyond summarizing articles and focuses on critically analyzing the relationships between works and relating the research to your own work. It discusses four stages of developing a literature review: problem formulation, literature search, data evaluation, and analysis/interpretation. The document also provides tips for clarifying requirements, finding models, narrowing topics, considering source currency, taking notes, choosing mini or full-length reviews, being critical and consistent, and finding a logical structure.
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review, including how to:
- Narrow your topic to a focused area and develop an organizing thesis
- Categorize sources chronologically, thematically, or by trend
- Synthesize information across sources rather than summarizing individual studies
- Balance direct quotations with paraphrasing and choose tenses appropriately
- Avoid common pitfalls like vagueness, limited scope, and irrelevant information
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review for a dissertation in statistics. It explains that a literature review is necessary to demonstrate that the proposed research is original and builds upon prior work. It recommends spending significant time reviewing references, taking detailed notes, and continually updating the list of sources as new relevant literature is discovered. The literature review should justify the research problem, methodology, and contributions to the field. It should provide evidence that the student is well-versed in the topic.
The document summarizes the key steps in writing a literature review:
1. The introduction gives a quick overview of the topic and organizational structure.
2. The body contains a discussion of sources, organized chronologically, thematically, or by methodology. It analyzes and synthesizes previous research on the topic.
3. The conclusions discuss what has been learned from reviewing the literature and identifies potential gaps for future research. The overall purpose is to critically evaluate previous research and establish a foundation and need for the current study.
This document provides an overview of literature reviews, including their definition, importance, purpose, types, sources, and steps. A literature review aims to critically evaluate previous research on a topic. It is important as it helps identify gaps and orient the reader. The main purposes are to focus on past research, show how a new study fills gaps, and set boundaries. Types include traditional narratives, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Sources are primary, secondary, and tertiary. The steps are to identify key terms, locate literature, evaluate and select sources, organize findings, and write the review. Elements to address in the review are an introduction, body, and conclusion.
BUSI 610Literature Review Title Page and Outline Rubric(50 P.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
BUSI 610
Literature Review
Title Page and Outline Rubric
(50 Points)
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Title Page and Outline: Content
32 to 35 points
The title page and outline are present. The title page contains the required components. The outline is well developed and includes headings and subheadings. The framework of the Literature review is apparent and well established. It includes all the required components as follows:
· Title page
· Abstract
· Introduction
· Findings
· Conclusions, recommendations, and suggestions for further study
· References
29 to 31 points
The title page and outline are present. Most of the components of the title page and outline are present. The outline contains headings and some subheadings. The framework of the Literature review can be seen but work is required.
1 to 28 points
The title page or outline are not complete. Many components are not present for the title page and/or the outline. The framework of the Literature Review is not apparent.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Title Page and Outline: Grammar and Spelling, APA formatting
(30%)
14 to 15 points
Spelling and grammar are correct. The assignment includes an outline that was per the APA format (Alphanumeric, Full sentence, or decimal). The entries are properly formatted. A cover sheet (title page) is present that is formatted per APA.
13 points
Spelling and grammar has some errors. Some APA formatting issues are present. A cover sheet (title page) is present that is formatted per APA.
1 to 12 points
Spelling and grammar errors distract. The annotations are poorly formed. APA formatting is not used. There is not a cover sheet (title page) present or it is not formatted per APA
0 points
Not present
BUSI 610
Literature Review Instructions
What Is a Literature Review?
A literature review is a survey and a discussion of the literature in a given area of study. It is a concise overview of what has been studied, argued, and established about a topic; it is generally organized chronologically or thematically. A literature review is also written in essay format.
A literature review is not an annotated bibliography because it groups related works together and discusses trends and developments rather than focusing on one item at a time. It is also not a summary; rather, a literature review evaluates previous and current research in regards to how relevant and/or useful it is and how it relates to your own research. Therefore, a literature review is more than an annotated bibliography or a summary because you are organizing and presenting your sources in terms of their overall relationship to your problem statement.
A literature review is written to highlight specific arguments and ideas in a field of study. By highlighting these arguments, the writer attempts to show what has been studied in the field and also where there are weaknesses, ga.
3. lecture 3 literature review & analytical framework developmentCông Nguyễn
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It outlines the purpose of a literature review as demonstrating knowledge of current research and identifying gaps to justify new research. An effective literature review adopts a critical perspective, evaluates sources, and develops a clear argument through synthesis rather than just reporting on individual studies. It should draw from a wide range of academic literature and other sources, while avoiding plagiarism. The document provides tips for structuring, writing and referencing a literature review to meet assessment criteria.
A literature review surveys scholarly sources on a particular topic, synthesizing key findings and concepts. It has four main objectives: to survey the literature, synthesize the information, critically analyze the information by identifying gaps and limitations, and present the literature in an organized way. A good literature review analyzes, interprets, and critically evaluates the literature to highlight patterns, themes, conflicts, and gaps. It demonstrates familiarity with the body of knowledge and establishes where the author's own research fits within existing research.
A literature review is a survey of academic sources on a particular project topic. It gives an overview of the ebb and flows information, permitting you to distinguish significant hypotheses, strategies, and holes in the current research.
A literature review is to show your reader that you have read, and have a good grasp of, the main published work concerning a particular topic or question in your field.
The document discusses literature reviews, including what they are, why they are conducted, and how to write one. A literature review provides an overview of what has been written about a specific topic by synthesizing various sources. Literature reviews are conducted to ensure the proposed research is novel and to demonstrate knowledge of prior studies. A good literature review has a clear structure with an introduction that establishes context, a body that logically groups and discusses prior studies, and a conclusion that connects back to the introduction.
This document provides guidance on writing a dissertation. It discusses key components of a dissertation, including formulating a research question, reviewing relevant literature, justifying research methods, presenting findings, and relating findings back to the original question. It recommends starting with a working title and short proposal, and outlines typical dissertation chapters: introduction, literature review, methodology, findings, discussion, and conclusions. The literature review should synthesize previous work and references. Methodology discusses research design. Findings presents results, and discussion relates these back to the literature. Conclusions assess what was learned. A sample timeline is provided, along with questions to ensure logical flow and structure.
The document discusses the structure and process of conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as a critical analysis and summary of previous research on a particular topic. The key parts of a literature review include an introduction outlining the topic and scope, a body section discussing and analyzing sources, and a conclusion. Effective reviews establish trends in research, assess strengths and weaknesses, and identify gaps. The steps outlined are planning, reading, analyzing, drafting and revising. Sources are organized thematically, chronologically or methodologically. The document also describes different types of literature reviews and sources to consider.
The document provides information on conducting a literature review for social research. It defines what constitutes literature and a review, and outlines the main functions of a literature review such as bringing clarity and focus to the research problem, improving the research methodology, broadening the knowledge base, and enabling contextualization of findings. The document also describes the key steps in conducting a literature review including identifying terms, searching and selecting relevant literature, reviewing and organizing the literature, developing a theoretical and conceptual framework, and writing about the literature reviewed under relevant subheadings.
Literature Review - How to write effectively.pptxnguyenlekhanhx02
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing and synthesizing existing works to place the current study in context, avoid duplication, and identify gaps. An effective literature review compares and contrasts authors' views, groups similar conclusions, and critically evaluates methodologies. It should highlight exemplary studies, identify patterns, and show how the current study relates to prior work. When searching literature, one should use a variety of sources and evaluate their credibility. The conclusion should draw key points and discuss the need for further research.
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as an evaluation and synthesis of previous research on a topic. The document outlines the main purposes of a literature review as conveying existing knowledge on a topic and identifying areas needing further research. It also discusses best practices for searching literature sources, organizing reviews thematically, and writing introductions, bodies, and conclusions for literature reviews. Key recommendations include being concise, selective, and focusing on evaluating evidence from sources.
A literature review surveys and summarizes scholarly sources on a topic, providing a critical evaluation. It determines previous research, theory development, and relevance to the problem. The six steps are: 1) determine when to search; 2) delimit search parameters; 3) access databases and search; 4) organize sources; 5) critically evaluate sources; 6) write the review integrating evaluations. The purpose is to provide context and justification for a new study.
This document provides an overview of writing a research proposal and literature review. It discusses that a research proposal describes an investigation by outlining what will be studied, why it is important, and how the research will be conducted. The proposal establishes a plan and framework for the research project. It typically includes sections for an introduction, literature review, research design, and references. The literature review discusses and analyzes previous scholarship on the topic to situate the proposed project within existing research.
A literature review is a critical summary of all the published works on a particular topic. Most research papers include a section on literature review as part of the introduction. However, a literature review can also be published as a standalone article. These slides will help you grasp the basics of writing a literature review.
Research is "creative and systematic work undertaken to increase the stock of knowledge". It involves the collection, organization and analysis of evidence to increase understanding of a topic, characterized by a particular attentiveness to controlling sources of bias and error.
This document provides guidance on writing a literature review. It defines a literature review as an analysis and synthesis of previous research on a topic. The purpose is to place one's own research in the context of existing literature and identify areas that need further study. The document outlines the components of a literature review, including defining the problem, searching relevant literature, evaluating sources, and analyzing findings. It also provides tips for writing such as developing a thesis, considering organization, using evidence from sources, and revising. The concluding sections emphasize the importance of thoroughly understanding sources and ensuring the literature review relates directly to the research topic.
The document provides guidance on writing a literature review. It explains that a literature review goes beyond summarizing articles and focuses on critically analyzing the relationships between works and relating the research to your own work. It discusses four stages of developing a literature review: problem formulation, literature search, data evaluation, and analysis/interpretation. The document also provides tips for clarifying requirements, finding models, narrowing topics, considering source currency, taking notes, choosing mini or full-length reviews, being critical and consistent, and finding a logical structure.
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review, including how to:
- Narrow your topic to a focused area and develop an organizing thesis
- Categorize sources chronologically, thematically, or by trend
- Synthesize information across sources rather than summarizing individual studies
- Balance direct quotations with paraphrasing and choose tenses appropriately
- Avoid common pitfalls like vagueness, limited scope, and irrelevant information
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review for a dissertation in statistics. It explains that a literature review is necessary to demonstrate that the proposed research is original and builds upon prior work. It recommends spending significant time reviewing references, taking detailed notes, and continually updating the list of sources as new relevant literature is discovered. The literature review should justify the research problem, methodology, and contributions to the field. It should provide evidence that the student is well-versed in the topic.
The document summarizes the key steps in writing a literature review:
1. The introduction gives a quick overview of the topic and organizational structure.
2. The body contains a discussion of sources, organized chronologically, thematically, or by methodology. It analyzes and synthesizes previous research on the topic.
3. The conclusions discuss what has been learned from reviewing the literature and identifies potential gaps for future research. The overall purpose is to critically evaluate previous research and establish a foundation and need for the current study.
This document provides an overview of literature reviews, including their definition, importance, purpose, types, sources, and steps. A literature review aims to critically evaluate previous research on a topic. It is important as it helps identify gaps and orient the reader. The main purposes are to focus on past research, show how a new study fills gaps, and set boundaries. Types include traditional narratives, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Sources are primary, secondary, and tertiary. The steps are to identify key terms, locate literature, evaluate and select sources, organize findings, and write the review. Elements to address in the review are an introduction, body, and conclusion.
BUSI 610Literature Review Title Page and Outline Rubric(50 P.docxfelicidaddinwoodie
BUSI 610
Literature Review
Title Page and Outline Rubric
(50 Points)
Criteria
Levels of Achievement
Content
70%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Title Page and Outline: Content
32 to 35 points
The title page and outline are present. The title page contains the required components. The outline is well developed and includes headings and subheadings. The framework of the Literature review is apparent and well established. It includes all the required components as follows:
· Title page
· Abstract
· Introduction
· Findings
· Conclusions, recommendations, and suggestions for further study
· References
29 to 31 points
The title page and outline are present. Most of the components of the title page and outline are present. The outline contains headings and some subheadings. The framework of the Literature review can be seen but work is required.
1 to 28 points
The title page or outline are not complete. Many components are not present for the title page and/or the outline. The framework of the Literature Review is not apparent.
0 points
Not present
Structure 30%
Advanced
Proficient
Developing
Not present
Title Page and Outline: Grammar and Spelling, APA formatting
(30%)
14 to 15 points
Spelling and grammar are correct. The assignment includes an outline that was per the APA format (Alphanumeric, Full sentence, or decimal). The entries are properly formatted. A cover sheet (title page) is present that is formatted per APA.
13 points
Spelling and grammar has some errors. Some APA formatting issues are present. A cover sheet (title page) is present that is formatted per APA.
1 to 12 points
Spelling and grammar errors distract. The annotations are poorly formed. APA formatting is not used. There is not a cover sheet (title page) present or it is not formatted per APA
0 points
Not present
BUSI 610
Literature Review Instructions
What Is a Literature Review?
A literature review is a survey and a discussion of the literature in a given area of study. It is a concise overview of what has been studied, argued, and established about a topic; it is generally organized chronologically or thematically. A literature review is also written in essay format.
A literature review is not an annotated bibliography because it groups related works together and discusses trends and developments rather than focusing on one item at a time. It is also not a summary; rather, a literature review evaluates previous and current research in regards to how relevant and/or useful it is and how it relates to your own research. Therefore, a literature review is more than an annotated bibliography or a summary because you are organizing and presenting your sources in terms of their overall relationship to your problem statement.
A literature review is written to highlight specific arguments and ideas in a field of study. By highlighting these arguments, the writer attempts to show what has been studied in the field and also where there are weaknesses, ga.
3. lecture 3 literature review & analytical framework developmentCông Nguyễn
This document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It outlines the purpose of a literature review as demonstrating knowledge of current research and identifying gaps to justify new research. An effective literature review adopts a critical perspective, evaluates sources, and develops a clear argument through synthesis rather than just reporting on individual studies. It should draw from a wide range of academic literature and other sources, while avoiding plagiarism. The document provides tips for structuring, writing and referencing a literature review to meet assessment criteria.
A literature review surveys scholarly sources on a particular topic, synthesizing key findings and concepts. It has four main objectives: to survey the literature, synthesize the information, critically analyze the information by identifying gaps and limitations, and present the literature in an organized way. A good literature review analyzes, interprets, and critically evaluates the literature to highlight patterns, themes, conflicts, and gaps. It demonstrates familiarity with the body of knowledge and establishes where the author's own research fits within existing research.
A literature review is a survey of academic sources on a particular project topic. It gives an overview of the ebb and flows information, permitting you to distinguish significant hypotheses, strategies, and holes in the current research.
A literature review is to show your reader that you have read, and have a good grasp of, the main published work concerning a particular topic or question in your field.
The document discusses literature reviews, including what they are, why they are conducted, and how to write one. A literature review provides an overview of what has been written about a specific topic by synthesizing various sources. Literature reviews are conducted to ensure the proposed research is novel and to demonstrate knowledge of prior studies. A good literature review has a clear structure with an introduction that establishes context, a body that logically groups and discusses prior studies, and a conclusion that connects back to the introduction.
This document provides guidance on writing a dissertation. It discusses key components of a dissertation, including formulating a research question, reviewing relevant literature, justifying research methods, presenting findings, and relating findings back to the original question. It recommends starting with a working title and short proposal, and outlines typical dissertation chapters: introduction, literature review, methodology, findings, discussion, and conclusions. The literature review should synthesize previous work and references. Methodology discusses research design. Findings presents results, and discussion relates these back to the literature. Conclusions assess what was learned. A sample timeline is provided, along with questions to ensure logical flow and structure.
The document discusses the structure and process of conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as a critical analysis and summary of previous research on a particular topic. The key parts of a literature review include an introduction outlining the topic and scope, a body section discussing and analyzing sources, and a conclusion. Effective reviews establish trends in research, assess strengths and weaknesses, and identify gaps. The steps outlined are planning, reading, analyzing, drafting and revising. Sources are organized thematically, chronologically or methodologically. The document also describes different types of literature reviews and sources to consider.
The document provides information on conducting a literature review for social research. It defines what constitutes literature and a review, and outlines the main functions of a literature review such as bringing clarity and focus to the research problem, improving the research methodology, broadening the knowledge base, and enabling contextualization of findings. The document also describes the key steps in conducting a literature review including identifying terms, searching and selecting relevant literature, reviewing and organizing the literature, developing a theoretical and conceptual framework, and writing about the literature reviewed under relevant subheadings.
Literature Review - How to write effectively.pptxnguyenlekhanhx02
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as analyzing and synthesizing existing works to place the current study in context, avoid duplication, and identify gaps. An effective literature review compares and contrasts authors' views, groups similar conclusions, and critically evaluates methodologies. It should highlight exemplary studies, identify patterns, and show how the current study relates to prior work. When searching literature, one should use a variety of sources and evaluate their credibility. The conclusion should draw key points and discuss the need for further research.
The document provides guidance on conducting a literature review. It defines a literature review as an evaluation and synthesis of previous research on a topic. The document outlines the main purposes of a literature review as conveying existing knowledge on a topic and identifying areas needing further research. It also discusses best practices for searching literature sources, organizing reviews thematically, and writing introductions, bodies, and conclusions for literature reviews. Key recommendations include being concise, selective, and focusing on evaluating evidence from sources.
A literature review surveys and summarizes scholarly sources on a topic, providing a critical evaluation. It determines previous research, theory development, and relevance to the problem. The six steps are: 1) determine when to search; 2) delimit search parameters; 3) access databases and search; 4) organize sources; 5) critically evaluate sources; 6) write the review integrating evaluations. The purpose is to provide context and justification for a new study.
This document provides an overview of writing a research proposal and literature review. It discusses that a research proposal describes an investigation by outlining what will be studied, why it is important, and how the research will be conducted. The proposal establishes a plan and framework for the research project. It typically includes sections for an introduction, literature review, research design, and references. The literature review discusses and analyzes previous scholarship on the topic to situate the proposed project within existing research.
Similar to Chap-3 Litrature Review.pptx business buyerbehavior (20)
Chap12.ppt add more information servive marketingOshadiVindika
This document discusses the role of customers in service delivery. It notes that customers can both enhance and detract from satisfaction through their interactions. Customers participate in the service delivery process and can act as "partial employees" contributing resources. They can also contribute to quality and their own satisfaction by providing feedback or performing their role well. However, customers may lack understanding of their role or interfere with others. The document provides frameworks for understanding different levels of customer participation and strategies businesses can use to enhance participation, such as defining customer jobs and managing the customer mix.
This chapter discusses the development of service products and experiences. It explains that a service product consists of a core product plus supplementary elements that enhance its value. The "flower of service" model illustrates how supplementary elements support the core. Branding strategies for service products are also reviewed, from using a single brand to separate sub-brands. The chapter emphasizes integrating core products with supplementary elements and delivery processes to create a seamless customer experience defined by the service brand.
The document outlines the 6 steps of marketing management: 1) Setting marketing objectives based on organizational mission and scanning opportunities. 2) Analysing marketing opportunities in light of company strengths and weaknesses both internally and externally. 3) Researching and selecting target markets by measuring attractiveness and estimating market size, growth, and profitability. 4) Designing marketing strategies to achieve objectives through broad principles and decisions on expenditures, marketing mix, and locations. 5) Planning marketing programs to implement strategies through decisions on product features, packaging, branding, and servicing policies. 6) Organizing, implementing, and controlling marketing efforts by designing an organization to carry out the marketing plan.
Chapter 3- Service quality and productivity.pdfOshadiVindika
Service quality is defined as meeting or exceeding customer expectations through high performance. SERVQUAL is a framework for measuring service quality across five dimensions: reliability, responsiveness, assurance, empathy and tangibles. There are five gaps between customer expectations and perceptions: 1) manager vs customer expectations, 2) standards vs expectations, 3) delivery vs standards, 4) promises vs delivery, 5) perceptions vs expectations. Strategies to close the gaps include improving communication between managers and customers, setting appropriate quality standards, ensuring delivery meets standards, aligning promises with capabilities, and consistently meeting expectations. Effective customer feedback uses a mix of tools to assess satisfaction, drive improvements and create a customer-centric culture.
The document discusses the marketing information system and market research process. It outlines five learning goals related to understanding the importance of information, defining the marketing information system, outlining the market research process, analyzing and distributing information, and special issues in market research. It then provides details on each step of the market research process, including defining the problem and objectives, developing the research plan through evaluating secondary and collecting primary data, and developing the sampling plan.
3 Simple Steps To Buy Verified Payoneer Account In 2024SEOSMMEARTH
Buy Verified Payoneer Account: Quick and Secure Way to Receive Payments
Buy Verified Payoneer Account With 100% secure documents, [ USA, UK, CA ]. Are you looking for a reliable and safe way to receive payments online? Then you need buy verified Payoneer account ! Payoneer is a global payment platform that allows businesses and individuals to send and receive money in over 200 countries.
If You Want To More Information just Contact Now:
Skype: SEOSMMEARTH
Telegram: @seosmmearth
Gmail: seosmmearth@gmail.com
Easily Verify Compliance and Security with Binance KYCAny kyc Account
Use our simple KYC verification guide to make sure your Binance account is safe and compliant. Discover the fundamentals, appreciate the significance of KYC, and trade on one of the biggest cryptocurrency exchanges with confidence.
The APCO Geopolitical Radar - Q3 2024 The Global Operating Environment for Bu...APCO
The Radar reflects input from APCO’s teams located around the world. It distils a host of interconnected events and trends into insights to inform operational and strategic decisions. Issues covered in this edition include:
Building Your Employer Brand with Social MediaLuanWise
Presented at The Global HR Summit, 6th June 2024
In this keynote, Luan Wise will provide invaluable insights to elevate your employer brand on social media platforms including LinkedIn, Facebook, Instagram, X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok. You'll learn how compelling content can authentically showcase your company culture, values, and employee experiences to support your talent acquisition and retention objectives. Additionally, you'll understand the power of employee advocacy to amplify reach and engagement – helping to position your organization as an employer of choice in today's competitive talent landscape.
Understanding User Needs and Satisfying ThemAggregage
https://www.productmanagementtoday.com/frs/26903918/understanding-user-needs-and-satisfying-them
We know we want to create products which our customers find to be valuable. Whether we label it as customer-centric or product-led depends on how long we've been doing product management. There are three challenges we face when doing this. The obvious challenge is figuring out what our users need; the non-obvious challenges are in creating a shared understanding of those needs and in sensing if what we're doing is meeting those needs.
In this webinar, we won't focus on the research methods for discovering user-needs. We will focus on synthesis of the needs we discover, communication and alignment tools, and how we operationalize addressing those needs.
Industry expert Scott Sehlhorst will:
• Introduce a taxonomy for user goals with real world examples
• Present the Onion Diagram, a tool for contextualizing task-level goals
• Illustrate how customer journey maps capture activity-level and task-level goals
• Demonstrate the best approach to selection and prioritization of user-goals to address
• Highlight the crucial benchmarks, observable changes, in ensuring fulfillment of customer needs
HOW TO START UP A COMPANY A STEP-BY-STEP GUIDE.pdf46adnanshahzad
How to Start Up a Company: A Step-by-Step Guide Starting a company is an exciting adventure that combines creativity, strategy, and hard work. It can seem overwhelming at first, but with the right guidance, anyone can transform a great idea into a successful business. Let's dive into how to start up a company, from the initial spark of an idea to securing funding and launching your startup.
Introduction
Have you ever dreamed of turning your innovative idea into a thriving business? Starting a company involves numerous steps and decisions, but don't worry—we're here to help. Whether you're exploring how to start a startup company or wondering how to start up a small business, this guide will walk you through the process, step by step.
How are Lilac French Bulldogs Beauty Charming the World and Capturing Hearts....Lacey Max
“After being the most listed dog breed in the United States for 31
years in a row, the Labrador Retriever has dropped to second place
in the American Kennel Club's annual survey of the country's most
popular canines. The French Bulldog is the new top dog in the
United States as of 2022. The stylish puppy has ascended the
rankings in rapid time despite having health concerns and limited
color choices.”
SATTA MATKA SATTA FAST RESULT KALYAN TOP MATKA RESULT KALYAN SATTA MATKA FAST RESULT MILAN RATAN RAJDHANI MAIN BAZAR MATKA FAST TIPS RESULT MATKA CHART JODI CHART PANEL CHART FREE FIX GAME SATTAMATKA ! MATKA MOBI SATTA 143 spboss.in TOP NO1 RESULT FULL RATE MATKA ONLINE GAME PLAY BY APP SPBOSS
Unveiling the Dynamic Personalities, Key Dates, and Horoscope Insights: Gemin...my Pandit
Explore the fascinating world of the Gemini Zodiac Sign. Discover the unique personality traits, key dates, and horoscope insights of Gemini individuals. Learn how their sociable, communicative nature and boundless curiosity make them the dynamic explorers of the zodiac. Dive into the duality of the Gemini sign and understand their intellectual and adventurous spirit.
Best practices for project execution and deliveryCLIVE MINCHIN
A select set of project management best practices to keep your project on-track, on-cost and aligned to scope. Many firms have don't have the necessary skills, diligence, methods and oversight of their projects; this leads to slippage, higher costs and longer timeframes. Often firms have a history of projects that simply failed to move the needle. These best practices will help your firm avoid these pitfalls but they require fortitude to apply.
Structural Design Process: Step-by-Step Guide for BuildingsChandresh Chudasama
The structural design process is explained: Follow our step-by-step guide to understand building design intricacies and ensure structural integrity. Learn how to build wonderful buildings with the help of our detailed information. Learn how to create structures with durability and reliability and also gain insights on ways of managing structures.
Taurus Zodiac Sign: Unveiling the Traits, Dates, and Horoscope Insights of th...my Pandit
Dive into the steadfast world of the Taurus Zodiac Sign. Discover the grounded, stable, and logical nature of Taurus individuals, and explore their key personality traits, important dates, and horoscope insights. Learn how the determination and patience of the Taurus sign make them the rock-steady achievers and anchors of the zodiac.
Industrial Tech SW: Category Renewal and CreationChristian Dahlen
Every industrial revolution has created a new set of categories and a new set of players.
Multiple new technologies have emerged, but Samsara and C3.ai are only two companies which have gone public so far.
Manufacturing startups constitute the largest pipeline share of unicorns and IPO candidates in the SF Bay Area, and software startups dominate in Germany.
IMPACT Silver is a pure silver zinc producer with over $260 million in revenue since 2008 and a large 100% owned 210km Mexico land package - 2024 catalysts includes new 14% grade zinc Plomosas mine and 20,000m of fully funded exploration drilling.
[To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations]
This PowerPoint compilation offers a comprehensive overview of 20 leading innovation management frameworks and methodologies, selected for their broad applicability across various industries and organizational contexts. These frameworks are valuable resources for a wide range of users, including business professionals, educators, and consultants.
Each framework is presented with visually engaging diagrams and templates, ensuring the content is both informative and appealing. While this compilation is thorough, please note that the slides are intended as supplementary resources and may not be sufficient for standalone instructional purposes.
This compilation is ideal for anyone looking to enhance their understanding of innovation management and drive meaningful change within their organization. Whether you aim to improve product development processes, enhance customer experiences, or drive digital transformation, these frameworks offer valuable insights and tools to help you achieve your goals.
INCLUDED FRAMEWORKS/MODELS:
1. Stanford’s Design Thinking
2. IDEO’s Human-Centered Design
3. Strategyzer’s Business Model Innovation
4. Lean Startup Methodology
5. Agile Innovation Framework
6. Doblin’s Ten Types of Innovation
7. McKinsey’s Three Horizons of Growth
8. Customer Journey Map
9. Christensen’s Disruptive Innovation Theory
10. Blue Ocean Strategy
11. Strategyn’s Jobs-To-Be-Done (JTBD) Framework with Job Map
12. Design Sprint Framework
13. The Double Diamond
14. Lean Six Sigma DMAIC
15. TRIZ Problem-Solving Framework
16. Edward de Bono’s Six Thinking Hats
17. Stage-Gate Model
18. Toyota’s Six Steps of Kaizen
19. Microsoft’s Digital Transformation Framework
20. Design for Six Sigma (DFSS)
To download this presentation, visit:
https://www.oeconsulting.com.sg/training-presentations
Income Tax exemption for Start up : Section 80 IAC
Chap-3 Litrature Review.pptx business buyerbehavior
1. Research Methodology
Chapter -3 Literature Review
S.Thowfeek Ahamed
Senior Lecturer
Hardy- Advanced Technological Institute (SLIATE)
Ampara
2.
3. Literature Review
Begin with a summary of the purpose statement that leads to a brief explanation of the
organization of the literature review. Do not simply cut and paste the Purpose Statement section
from Chapter 1.
• Include several subheadings that are specific to this dissertation.
• To ensure that the study is relevant, current, and warranted, approximately 85% of references
must be to peer-reviewed research that was published within the last 5 years of when the
dissertation will be completed.
At the end of this section, list the databases that were accessed and the search engines that were
used. List all the search parameters, including the search terms and their combinations (with more
detailed search terms located in an appendix, if appropriate), range of years,and types of literature.
Slide 14-3
4. Literature Review
• Literature review is always a herculean task. This is because it is often
the part of the project report that fills more pages than any other part.
Also, it needs good writing and evaluation skills to determine which
information is to be added and under which subsection is such to be
added and which information is not to be added. It is also the part
where you find two or more contradictory views and you need good
writing skill to document them and further make decision as to the view
you have chosen to uphold in your study by giving cogent reasons.
• Moreover, in-text citation is also one reason why the literature review is
more difficult than all other sections of the research report. Unlike
other parts, the literature review requires extensive citation and
bibliography record keeping. This is often very exhaustive and tiring
especially when it is being done using certain lower versions of
referencing styles.
Slide 14-4
5. Critical Literature Review
A literature review is “the selection of available documents (both
published and unpublished) on the topic, which contain information,
ideas, data and evidence written from a particular standpoint to fulfill
certain aims or express certain views on the nature of the topic and
how it is to be investigated, and the effective evaluation of these
documents in relation to the research being proposed” (Hart, 1998, p.
13).
Slide 4-5
6. Functions Literature Review
In general, a literature review ensures that:
1. The research effort is positioned relative to existing knowledge and builds on this
knowledge.
2. You can look at a problem from a specific angle.
3. You do not run the risk of “reinventing the wheel”;
4. You are able to introduce relevant terminology and to define key terms used in
your writing.
5. You obtain useful insights of the research methods others have used to provide
an answer to similar research questions.
6. The research effort can be contextualized in a wider academic debate.
Slide 4-6
7. Functions Literature Review
Some of the functions of a critical literature review depend on the type
of study and the specific research approach that is taken.
• In a descriptive study it may help you to come up with a comprehensive
overview of the relevant perspectives on the topic, a guiding definition,
and an in-depth overview of frameworks, instruments, and analytical
tools that will help you to describe something.
• In a project that is inductive and exploratory in nature, it may help you
to develop a theoretical background, which provides an overview of
the key literature pertinent to your specific topic
Slide 4-7
8. Functions Literature Review
• In a deductive study, a review of the literature will allow you to
develop a theoretical background. This may help you to obtain a
clear idea as to what variables will be important to consider in his
theoretical framework, why they are considered important, how
they are related to each other, and how they should be measured
to solve the problem. A critical review of the literature may also
help you to provide arguments for the relationships between the
variables in your conceptual causal model and to develop
hypotheses.
Slide 4-8
9. Importance of Literature Review
• A good literature survey:
• Ensures that important variables are not left out of the study.
• Helps the development of the theoretical framework and hypotheses for
testing.
• Ensures that the problem statement is precise and clear.
• Enhances testability and replicability of the findings.
• Reduces the risk of “reinventing the wheel”.
• Confirms that the problem is perceived as relevant and significant.
9
10. Data Sources
• Textbooks
• Academic and professional journals
• Theses
• Conference proceedings
• Unpublished manuscripts
• Reports of government departments and corporations
• Newspapers
• The Internet
Slide 4-10
11. Searching for Literature
• Most libraries have the following electronic resources at their
disposal:
• Electronic journals
• Full-text databases
• Bibliographic databases
• Abstract databases
Slide 4-11
12. Evaluating the Literature
• Titles
• Abstract
• Table of contents/first chapter book
• Number of citations
Slide 4-12
13. Documenting the Literature Review
• Literature review introduces
• Subject study
• Highlights the problem
• Summarizes work done so far
Slide 4-13
14. Common Forms of Plagiarism
Sources not cited
1. “The Ghost Writer”
2. “The Photocopy”
3. “The Potluck Paper”
4. “The Poor Disguise”
5. “The Labor of Laziness”
6. “The Self-Stealer”
Slide 4-14
15. Common Forms of Plagiarism
Sources cited (but still plagiarized)
1.“The Forgotten Footnote”
2.“The Misinformer”
3.“The Too-Perfect Paraphrase”
4.“The Resourceful Citer”
5.“The Perfect Crime”
Slide 4-15
16. It helps to think of the organization of a good literature review as an inverse triangle. After first establishing the
seminal theories and foundational research that inform your approach and topic. You then narrow your discussion
to focus on the specific studies and methodologies that justify your research gap design.
LITERTURE REVIEW
20. How do I write a literature review ?
1. Plan 2. Read
3.
Analyze
4. write
5.
Revise
The Research Process
Beggin your research by using the library databases to locate Peer - reviewed scholarly journal articles, books, and other sources to discuss in
you literature review.
Save all sources that you find. Save electronic sources to a folder on your computer, flash drive, or cloud, and photocopy pages from books,
magazines, or other print sources.
The most important thing to do as you gather sources is to eannotate. Highlight, underline, write in the margins, take potes, or flag pages with
Post-Its. This will not only help you to keep track of sources man points but also help you to see patterns, find common themes, and identify
gaps in the research.
Throughout your research, you may find that several of your sources refer to a particular scholar, work, or study. This repetition usually
indicates that the scholar, work, or study is a classic source in this field, and therefore, you should try to locate the source as it could be a
fundamental piece of your literature review.
If at one point in your research, you get stuck, one of the best things you can do is to consult the works Cited/ References/ Bibliography
sections of the most helpful sources that you have found. These sections will list a multitude of sources that may be worth consulting. Other
useful sections to check for sources are the footnotes and endnotes of a work.
If you are unsure of how many sources you need to gather before writing your literature review, read until you feel that you have a thorough
understanding of the topic you are reviewing.
Once you feel that you are ready to begin writing your literature review, organize your sources and your notes to help guide you as you write.
21. What is a literature review?
A literature review presents an overview of a
particular topic for which a large body of research
and scholarship already exists
What is purpose of literature review?
The purpose of a literature reviews to critically assess
the existing body of a research in a particular area
through summary, comparison, and evaluation of the
published research studies
What should a literature review look
like?
The format of a literature review will vary
according to the discipline and assignment for
which it is written. The literature review can be a
standalone assignment, a section of a research
paper, or a chapter in a thesis or dissertation
How long does my literature review need to be?
A literature review will vary in length according to the discipline
and assignment. If it is a standalone assignment, it may be a few
pages in length if it is a section of a research paper, the length
may vary from a few paragraphs to a page or two. If it is a
chapter of a thesis or dissertation, the literature review will
consist of several pages, Always refer to your assignment prompt
or consult with your in structure
How long does my literature review need to be?
A literature review will vary in length according to the discipline
and assignment. If it is a standalone assignment, it may be a few
pages in length if it is a section of a research paper, the length
may vary from a few paragraphs to a page or two. If it is a
chapter of a thesis or dissertation, the literature review will
consist of several pages, Always refer to your assignment prompt
or consult with your in structure
22.
23.
24. Literature Review Format
Introduction
• Provide an overview of the topic, theme, or issue.
• Identify your specific area of focus.
• Describe your methodology and rationale. How did you decide which sources to include and which to exclude? Why? How
is your review organized?
• Briefly discuss the overall trends in the published scholarship in this area.
• Established your reason for writing the review.
Body
• Find the best organizational method for your review (see boxes below)
• Summarize sources by providing the most relevant information.
• Respectfully and objectively critique and evaluate the studies.
• Use direct quotations sparingly and only if appropriate.
Conclusion
• Summarize the major findings of the sources that you reviewed. Remembering to keep the focus on your topic.
• Evaluate the current state of scholarship in this area. (ex. Flaws or gaps in the research, inconsistencies in findings)
• Identify any areas for further research.
• Conclude by making a connection between your topic and some larger area of study such as the discipline.
26. Examples of Literature Reviews
Example 1
In Gretel Ehrlich’s essay. ‘’About Men,’’ she is more interested in describing a particular type of man a cowboy
than men in general. Contrary to social stereotypes of a ‘’macho, trigger-happy man.’’ she describes cowboys as
sensitive and humorous, and gives examples to back up her assertions. Her own appreciation for this often
misunderstood type of life- style lends her to argue that these men are ’’androgynous at the core’’ (204); men
who are rugged, powerful, and courageous- as well as sensitive, generous, and ultimately vulnerable. Dave
Barry. On the other hand, is much less romantic in his approach to describing men. In his essay ‘’Guys vs Men,’’
Barry humorously categorizes the majority of the male gender as ‘’guys’’ or ‘’men.’’ Although most of the essay
is spent describing what it mens to be a guy. He does briefly define men as those who take their manhood
seriously, which result in ‘’stupid, behavioral patterns that can produis unfortunate results such as violent crime,
war, spitting, and ice hockey’’ (361). He defines ‘’guys’’ as being much more laid back, interested in technology
simply because it is technology (or ‘’ neat stuft’’as he calls it), enjoying pointless challenges, having difficulty
maintaining a right moral code and communicating intimate feeling. He seems to assume that this kind of ‘’ guy-
ness’’ is pretty widespread in American society. Where barry treats the concept of masculinity humorously,
paut teherou’s treatment of masculinity is serious, with wide-reaching implications. For him, the American
scrsion of manhood involves a lack of feeling and critical thinking, requiring men to be stupid, aggressive, and
raisogvnistic. It is, he writes ‘’essentially write wing, puritaaanicl, cowardly, neurotic, and fuelled largely by a fear
of women’’ (539).
• This a poor example of a literature review because the sources are simply organized by author review
provides summary rather than analysis.
27. Examples of Literature Reviews
Example 2
• In the wake of the various feminist movements of the twentieth century in America, we have become
increasingly of what is means to be a women, and the ways in which societal expectations shape the
expression of femininity. What such discussions often leave out-or at least gloss over-is a corresponding
critical examination of what societal expectations are for men ,and what the implications of these
expectations may be. A brief comparison of three vastly different essays-Gretel Ehrlich’s ‘’about men.’’
Dave Barry’s ‘’guys vs. men‘’ and Paul Theroux’s ‘’being a man’’ – offer us useful framework for thinking
about the social construction of masculinity, particularly in terms of its limitations.
• Underlying all three essays is a sense of masculinity as prescriptive- and limiting. All three acknowledge,
at least tacitly, that society often valorizes masculinity as aggressive, unfeeling, and powerful. Although
Barry glosses over manhood on his way to defining ‘’guys.’’ he acknowledges that masculine behavior
‘’can produce unfortunate results such as violent crime war spitting, and ice hockey’’ (361). Ehrlich
acknowledges the negative limits of manhood by taking pains to establish the androgyny (primarily
through proofs of emotional sensitivity and vulnerability) of what is typically considered one of the most
‘’manly’’ occupations-the cowboy. Theroux of the three authors, is the most explicit about the negative
limits of masculinity, and the ways that expectations about masculine behavior damage our society-both
by the result in misogyny and by the limits masculinity puts on cultural and emotional expression of men.
• This is a successful example of a literature review because the review present an organized, cohesive
argument, and the sources are analyzed rather than summarized.
28. Step 1
Decide on your areas of research
Before you begin to search for articles or books, decide beforehand what areas you are going to research. make sure that you only get articles and
books in those areas, even if you come across fascinating books in other areas.
Step 2
Search for the literature
Conduct a comprehensive bibliographic search of books and articles in your area. Read the abstracts online and download and /or print those
articles that pertain to your area of research. Find books in the library that are relevant and check them out. Set a specific time frame for how long
you will search. It should not take more than two or three dedicated time sessions.
Step 3
Find relevant excerpts in your books and articles
Skim the contents of each book and article and look specifically for these five things (1).Claims, conclusions and findings about the constructs
you’re investigating (2) Definition of terms. (3)Calls for follow - up the studies relevant to your project. (4) Gaps you notice in the literature and;
(5) Disagreement about the constructs you are investigating .
When you find any of these five things. type the relevant takes longer than simply typing the excerpt. Make sure to note the name of the author
and the page number following each excerpt. Do this for each article and book that you have in your stack of literature. When you are done print
out your exexcerpts.
29. Step 4
Code literature
Get out pair of scissors and cut each excerpt out. Now sort the pieces of paper into similar topics. Figure out what the main themes.
place each excerpts that you can't figure out where they belong.Separate those and go over them again at the and to see if you need
now categories. When you finish, placeeach stack of notes into an envelope labeled with the name of the theme.
Step 5
Create your conceptual Schema
Type in large the name of each of your coded themes. Print this out and cut the titles in to individual sleeps of paper to a table or
large workspace and figure out the best way to organize them.
Are there ideas that go together or that are in dialogue with each other? Are there ideas that contradict each other ? Move around the
slips of paper until you come up with a way of organizing the codes that makes sense.Write the conceptual schema down before you
forget or someone cleans up your slips of paper.
Step 6
Begin to write your literature review
Choose any section of your conceptual schema to begin with.You can begin anywhere, because you already know the order. Find the
envelope with the excerpts in them and lay them on the table in front of you. Figure out the mini conceptual schema based on that
theme by grouping together those excerpts that say the same thing. Use that mini conceptual schema to write up your literature
review based on the experts that you have in front of you. Don’t forget to include the citations as you write. So as not to lose track of
who said what repeat the for each sections of your literature review .
Once you complete the 6 steps you will have a complete draft of your literature review. The great thing about this process is that it
breaks down into manageable steps something that seems enormous : writing a literature review.
