This document provides an overview of writing a research proposal and literature review. It discusses that a research proposal describes an investigation by outlining what will be studied, why it is important, and how the research will be conducted. The proposal establishes a plan and framework for the research project. It typically includes sections for an introduction, literature review, research design, and references. The literature review discusses and analyzes previous scholarship on the topic to situate the proposed project within existing research.
A literature review is a survey of academic sources on a particular project topic. It gives an overview of the ebb and flows information, permitting you to distinguish significant hypotheses, strategies, and holes in the current research.
A literature review is to show your reader that you have read, and have a good grasp of, the main published work concerning a particular topic or question in your field.
A literature review is a survey of academic sources on a particular project topic. It gives an overview of the ebb and flows information, permitting you to distinguish significant hypotheses, strategies, and holes in the current research.
A literature review is to show your reader that you have read, and have a good grasp of, the main published work concerning a particular topic or question in your field.
The role of the literature review Your literature review gives y.docxoreo10
The role of the literature review
Your literature review gives your readers an understanding of the evolution of scholarly research on your topic.
In your literature review you will:
•survey the scholarly landscape
•provide a synthesis of the issues, trends, and concepts
•possibly provide some historical background
Throughout the literature review, your emphasis should fall on the current scholarly conversation. This is why the rubric often specifies that you need resources from peer-reviewed journals, published within the last five years of your anticipated graduation date. It's in these recent, peer-reviewed journals that the scholarly debate is being carried out!
The literature review also shows the "gap" in the conversation -- and how your own doctoral study will fill that gap and contribute to the scholarly knowledge. This is where you make the case for the importance and usefulness for your own work.
Searching comprehensively
Your literature review should be as comprehensive as possible -- you want to include all of the relevant resources dealing with your topic. Missing important articles or researchers will significantly weaken your scholarship! So, searching comprehensively becomes important.
To ensuring comprehensiveness:
•Identify the databases that will cover your topic
◦Spend some time reading the descriptions of the databases in your subject area
◦Contact the Library to get advice from a librarian on appropriate databases
◦Some topics cross over subject/theoretical boundaries, and librarians can suggest databases that you may not have considered
•Search in more than one database
◦Some of our databases are huge, containing thousands of journals, but no single database covers every journal relevant to a topic
◦Searching in each relevant database, one at a time, gives you a better sense of control over your search, as well as a more accurate idea of the journals/databases that you've covered
Using a multi-database search (such as Thoreau) is not necessarily recommended; in doing so, you lose the ability to use subject terms and search limits that may be unique to each database.
•Explore resources outside of the databases:
◦Government websites
◦Professional organizations
◦Research groups
◦Think tanks
These can all be important sources of statistics and reliable information. These will not be peer-reviewed resources (i.e. since they are not journals, they do not employ the same sort of editorial process that results in peer-review). Evaluating for reliability is important!
Beyond the Library: Google Scholar
Google Scholar provides a good way to take your search beyond the databases; it searches very broadly and will pull in resources you may not have discovered before.
Google's definition of scholarly includes government sites, think tanks, research organizations, journal websites, and of course colleges and universities.
Unfortunately, there is no way to limit your Google Scholar search to only peer-reviewed res ...
The role of the literature review Your literature review gives y.docxoreo10
The role of the literature review
Your literature review gives your readers an understanding of the evolution of scholarly research on your topic.
In your literature review you will:
•survey the scholarly landscape
•provide a synthesis of the issues, trends, and concepts
•possibly provide some historical background
Throughout the literature review, your emphasis should fall on the current scholarly conversation. This is why the rubric often specifies that you need resources from peer-reviewed journals, published within the last five years of your anticipated graduation date. It's in these recent, peer-reviewed journals that the scholarly debate is being carried out!
The literature review also shows the "gap" in the conversation -- and how your own doctoral study will fill that gap and contribute to the scholarly knowledge. This is where you make the case for the importance and usefulness for your own work.
Searching comprehensively
Your literature review should be as comprehensive as possible -- you want to include all of the relevant resources dealing with your topic. Missing important articles or researchers will significantly weaken your scholarship! So, searching comprehensively becomes important.
To ensuring comprehensiveness:
•Identify the databases that will cover your topic
◦Spend some time reading the descriptions of the databases in your subject area
◦Contact the Library to get advice from a librarian on appropriate databases
◦Some topics cross over subject/theoretical boundaries, and librarians can suggest databases that you may not have considered
•Search in more than one database
◦Some of our databases are huge, containing thousands of journals, but no single database covers every journal relevant to a topic
◦Searching in each relevant database, one at a time, gives you a better sense of control over your search, as well as a more accurate idea of the journals/databases that you've covered
Using a multi-database search (such as Thoreau) is not necessarily recommended; in doing so, you lose the ability to use subject terms and search limits that may be unique to each database.
•Explore resources outside of the databases:
◦Government websites
◦Professional organizations
◦Research groups
◦Think tanks
These can all be important sources of statistics and reliable information. These will not be peer-reviewed resources (i.e. since they are not journals, they do not employ the same sort of editorial process that results in peer-review). Evaluating for reliability is important!
Beyond the Library: Google Scholar
Google Scholar provides a good way to take your search beyond the databases; it searches very broadly and will pull in resources you may not have discovered before.
Google's definition of scholarly includes government sites, think tanks, research organizations, journal websites, and of course colleges and universities.
Unfortunately, there is no way to limit your Google Scholar search to only peer-reviewed res ...
Boudoir photography, a genre that captures intimate and sensual images of individuals, has experienced significant transformation over the years, particularly in New York City (NYC). Known for its diversity and vibrant arts scene, NYC has been a hub for the evolution of various art forms, including boudoir photography. This article delves into the historical background, cultural significance, technological advancements, and the contemporary landscape of boudoir photography in NYC.
This document announces the winners of the 2024 Youth Poster Contest organized by MATFORCE. It lists the grand prize and age category winners for grades K-6, 7-12, and individual age groups from 5 years old to 18 years old.
Hadj Ounis's most notable work is his sculpture titled "Metamorphosis." This piece showcases Ounis's mastery of form and texture, as he seamlessly combines metal and wood to create a dynamic and visually striking composition. The juxtaposition of the two materials creates a sense of tension and harmony, inviting viewers to contemplate the relationship between nature and industry.
This tutorial offers a step-by-step guide on how to effectively use Pinterest. It covers the basics such as account creation and navigation, as well as advanced techniques including creating eye-catching pins and optimizing your profile. The tutorial also explores collaboration and networking on the platform. With visual illustrations and clear instructions, this tutorial will equip you with the skills to navigate Pinterest confidently and achieve your goals.
Fashionista Chic Couture Maze & Coloring Adventures is a coloring and activity book filled with many maze games and coloring activities designed to delight and engage young fashion enthusiasts. Each page offers a unique blend of fashion-themed mazes and stylish illustrations to color, inspiring creativity and problem-solving skills in children.
4. WHAT IS A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
• A research proposal describes what you will investigate, why it’s
important, and how you will conduct your research.
5. WHAT IS THE FORMAT OF A RESEARCH
PROPOSAL?
• A research proposal serves as a blueprint and guide for your research
plan, helping you get organized and feel confident in the path forward
you choose to take.
6. WHAT IS THE OBJECTIVE OF A
RESEARCH PROPOSAL?
• The format of a research proposal varies between fields, but most
proposals will contain at least these elements:
• Title page
• Introduction
• Literature review
• Research design
• Reference list
7. WHAT IS THE RESEARCH PROPOSAL
LENGTH
The length of a research proposal can vary quite a bit. A bachelor’s or
master’s thesis proposal can be just a few pages, while proposals for PhD
dissertations or research funding are usually much longer and more
detailed. Your supervisor can help you determine the best length for your
work.
8. INTRODUCTION
Introduce your topic
Give necessary background and context
Outline your problem statement and research question
To guide your introduction, include information about:
• Who could have an interest in the topic (e.g., scientists, policymakers)
• How much is already known about the topic
• What is missing from this current knowledge
• What new insights your research will contribute
• Why you believe this research is worth doing
9. LITERATURE REVIEW
As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most
important research on your topic. A strong literature review shows your reader that your
project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re
not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using
existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.
In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in
the field by:
• Comparing and contrasting the main theories, methods, and debates
• Examining the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches
• Explaining how will you build on, challenge, or synthesize prior scholarship
10. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS
Following the literature review, restate your main objectives. This brings
the focus back to your own project. Next, your research
design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and
the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions
11. BUILDING A RESEARCH PROPOSAL
METHODOLOGY
Research type- Qualitative or quantitative?
Original data collection or primary and secondary source analysis?
Descriptive, correlational, or experimental research design?
Population and sample Who or what will you study (e.g., high school students in New
York; local newspaper archives 1976-80)?
How will you select your subjects (e.g., probability sampling, non-probability sampling)?
When and where will you collect your data?
Research methods What data collection tools and procedures will you use
(e.g., surveys, interviews, observational studies, experiments)?
Why?
12. CONTRIBUTION TO KNOWLEDGE
• To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential
implications of your research for your field. Emphasize again what you
aim to contribute and why it matters.
• For example, your results might have implications for:
• Improving best practices
• Informing policymaking decisions
• Strengthening a theory or model
• Challenging popular or scientific beliefs
• Creating a basis for future research
13. LITERATURE REVIEW
• a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a
topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also
called synthesis).
• the research (scholarship) in a given field. You will often see the terms
“the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly
interchangeably.
14. PICKING A TOPIC
• An academic research paper attempts to develop a new argument, and typically
has a literature review as one of its parts. In a research paper, the author uses
the literature review to show how his or her new insights build upon and depart
from existing scholarship. A literature review by itself does not try to make a
new argument based on original research, but rather summarizes, synthesizes,
and critiques the arguments and ideas of others, and points to gaps
15. HOW IS A LITERATURE REVIEW
DIFFERENT FROM A RESEARCH PAPER?
• An academic research paper attempts to develop a new argument, and typically
has a literature review as one of its parts. In a research paper, the author uses
the literature review to show how his or her new insights build upon and depart
from existing scholarship. A literature review by itself does not try to make a
new argument based on original research, but rather summarizes, synthesizes,
and critiques the arguments and ideas of others, and points to gaps in the
current literature. Before writing a literature review, a student should look for a
model from a relevant journal or ask the instructor to point to a good example.
• Picking a Topic
16. FINDING RELEVANT LITERATURE
With the advent of electronic databases like JSTOR, Academic Search Complete,
Lexis/Nexis, and Project Muse, it has become relatively easy to find relevant and
trustworthy sources for a literature review essay. These and many more scholarly
databases are available in the Library
When searching these databases, the writer needs to use keywords or phrases that
are as closely associated with the topic as possible. Searching with one or two
phrases surrounded by quotation marks (for example, “Civil War” in tandem with
“economic impact”) will help to hone in on the most relevant results, as only
articles that contain those two specific phrases will be found.
17. INTRODUCTION
1. Defines and identifies the topic and establishes the reason for the literature
review.
2. Points to general trends in what has been published about the topic.
3. Explains the criteria used in analyzing and comparing articles.
18. BODY OF THE REVIEW
1. Defines and identifies the topic and establishes the reason for the literature
review.
2. Points to general trends in what has been published about the topic.
3. Explains the criteria used in analyzing and comparing articles.
19. CONCLUSION
1. Summarizes the major themes that emerged in the review and identifies areas
of controversy in the literature.
2. Pinpoints strengths and weaknesses among the articles (innovative methods
used, gaps in research, problems with theoretical frameworks, etc.).
3. Concludes by formulating questions that need further research within the topic
and provides some insight into the relationship between that topic and the
larger field of study or discipline.
Editor's Notes
Introduction
The first part of your proposal is the initial pitch for your project. Make sure it succinctly explains what you want to do and why.
Your introduction should:
Introduce your topic
Give necessary background and context
Outline your problem statement and research questions
To guide your introduction, include information about:
Who could have an interest in the topic (e.g., scientists, policymakers)
How much is already known about the topic
What is missing from this current knowledge
What new insights your research will contribute
Why you believe this research is worth doing
Literature review
As you get started, it’s important to demonstrate that you’re familiar with the most important research on your topic. A strong literature review shows your reader that your project has a solid foundation in existing knowledge or theory. It also shows that you’re not simply repeating what other people have already done or said, but rather using existing research as a jumping-off point for your own.
In this section, share exactly how your project will contribute to ongoing conversations in the field by:
Comparing and contrasting the main theories, methods, and debates
Examining the strengths and weaknesses of different approaches
Explaining how will you build on, challenge, or synthesize prior scholarship
Research design and methods
Following the literature review, restate your main objectives. This brings the focus back to your own project. Next, your research design or methodology section will describe your overall approach, and the practical steps you will take to answer your research questions.
Building a research proposal methodology
Research type Qualitative or quantitative?
Original data collection or primary and secondary source analysis?
Descriptive, correlational, or experimental research design?
Population and sample Who or what will you study (e.g., high school students in New York; local newspaper archives 1976-80)?
How will you select your subjects (e.g., probability sampling, non-probability sampling)?
When and where will you collect your data?
Research methods What data collection tools and procedures will you use (e.g., surveys, interviews, observational studies, experiments)?
Why?
Contribution to knowledge
To finish your proposal on a strong note, explore the potential implications of your research for your field. Emphasize again what you aim to contribute and why it matters.
For example, your results might have implications for:
Improving best practices
Informing policymaking decisions
Strengthening a theory or model
Challenging popular or scientific beliefs
Creating a basis for future research
A literature review is a document or section of a document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each other (also called synthesis).
The lit review is an important genre in many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays).
When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research (scholarship) in a given field. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably.
A literature review is a survey of scholarly articles, books, or other sources that pertain to a specific topic, area of research, or theory. The literature review offers brief descriptions, summaries, and critical evaluations of each work, and does so in the form of a well organized essay. Scholars often write literature reviews to provide an overview of the most significant recent literature published on a topic. They also use literature reviews to trace the evolution of certain debates or intellectual problems within a field. Even if a literature review is not a formal part of a research project, students should conduct an informal one so that they know what kind of scholarly work has been done previously on the topic that they have selected.
How Is a Literature Review Different from a Research Paper?An academic research paper attempts to develop a new argument, and typically has a literature review as one of its parts. In a research paper, the author uses the literature review to show how his or her new insights build upon and depart from existing scholarship. A literature review by itself does not try to make a new argument based on original research, but rather summarizes, synthesizes, and critiques the arguments and ideas of others, and points to gaps in the current literature. Before writing a literature review, a student should look for a model from a relevant journal or ask the instructor to point to a good example.
How Is a Literature Review Different from a Research Paper?An academic research paper attempts to develop a new argument, and typically has a literature review as one of its parts. In a research paper, the author uses the literature review to show how his or her new insights build upon and depart from existing scholarship. A literature review by itself does not try to make a new argument based on original research, but rather summarizes, synthesizes, and critiques the arguments and ideas of others, and points to gaps in the current literature. Before writing a literature review, a student should look for a model from a relevant journal or ask the instructor to point to a good example.
Picking a TopicFirst, the writer needs to pick a topic that she finds compelling and that is relevant to the course. Second, the topic should be relatively narrow so that it does not overwhelm the writer. For example, the literature on the causes of the U.S. Civil War is much too vast for a short review essay. A review of recent scholarship published on the economic impact of secession on the Confederacy is probably narrow enough for a relatively short essay. In most cases, students will need to clear a topic with the instructor before proceeding to make sure that it is a relevant topic of the proper scope.
Finding Relevant LiteratureWith the advent of electronic databases like JSTOR, Academic Search Complete, Lexis/Nexis, and Project Muse, it has become relatively easy to find relevant and trustworthy sources for a literature review essay. These and many more scholarly databases are available on the Brooklyn College Library website here:
http://dewey.brooklyn.cuny.edu/resources/?view=databases
When searching these databases, the writer needs to use keywords or phrases that are as closely associated with the topic as possible. Searching with one or two phrases surrounded by quotation marks (for example, “Civil War” in tandem with “economic impact”) will help to hone in on the most relevant results, as only articles that contain those two specific phrases will be found.
Evaluating the LiteratureAfter students have found a number of articles or books related to a topic, they will evaluate them to determine which ones seem to make the most important contributions to the scholarship on the topic. For undergraduate students, this step is often difficult since they are not experts and are just beginning to learn about major themes and debates within a field. Nonetheless, by asking some of the questions below, student writers can make a pretty well educated assessment about whether or not an article contributes something significant to the relevant area of scholarship. In addition, evaluating articles with these questions will be helpful in figuring out how to organize the material later when composing the essay.
Questions to Ask about Individual Articles
Handout IV
Does the article have a clear thesis statement? Is that thesis supported by a well organized argument that uses convincing evidence?
What strategies or methodologies does the author use in the article?
Was the article published in a respected academic journal? (Undergraduates should ask their
instructor to identify the leading journals in the field. Databases like JSTOR tend to carry only
journals with good scholarly reputations.)
Is the author someone who seems reliable? Might the author have some sort of agenda or
ideological motivation that might affect the way the argument is presented? (A Google search can
be useful.)
How recently was the article published? In rapidly changing fields, research can become dated
quickly, so it is generally preferable to use articles published within the past five years or so. (In some cases, the instructor may tell students to use older articles with newer ones to trace how ideas and debates have changed over time.)
What original contribution does the article make to the discussion about the topic? Organizing a Literature Review
A successful literature review should have three parts that break down in the following way:
A. INTRODUCTION
Defines and identifies the topic and establishes the reason for the literature review.
Points to general trends in what has been published about the topic.
Explains the criteria used in analyzing and comparing articles.
B. BODY OF THE REVIEW
Groups articles into thematic clusters, or subtopics. Clusters may be grouped together chronologically,
thematically, or methodologically (see below for more on this).
Proceeds in a logical order from cluster to cluster.
Emphasizes the main findings or arguments of the articles in the student’s own words. Keeps
quotations from sources to an absolute minimum.
B. CONCLUSION
Summarizes the major themes that emerged in the review and identifies areas of controversy in the
literature.
Pinpoints strengths and weaknesses among the articles (innovative methods used, gaps in research,
problems with theoretical frameworks, etc.).
Concludes by formulating questions that need further research within the topic, and provides some
insight into the relationship between that topic and the larger field of study or discipline.
Creating Clusters or Subtopics
Chronological Groupings: With this method, you can group material according to when it was published or the time period the material addresses. For example, for a literature review about post-1965 immigration to New York City, you might group the material that addresses the 1960s and 1970s in one section, and the 1980s and 1990s in another. This method works well in essays that trace the evolution of a certain theme or idea over time, but can be less coherent in other contexts.
Thematic Groupings: In this approach, sections might be organized around particular subthemes within the essay’s topic. For the post-1965 immigration essay mentioned above, you might organize separate sections on literature dealing with different ethnic groups: Asians, Eastern Europeans, Mexicans, etc.
Methodological Groupings: A methodological approach differs from the two above in that it does not focus so much on the content, but the “methods” of the researcher or writer. In the above example, authors who interpret demographic data from the census might be put in one group, while another group might be formed around work that uses ethnographic approaches.
How Is a Literature Review Different from a Research Paper?An academic research paper attempts to develop a new argument, and typically has a literature review as one of its parts. In a research paper, the author uses the literature review to show how his or her new insights build upon and depart from existing scholarship. A literature review by itself does not try to make a new argument based on original research, but rather summarizes, synthesizes, and critiques the arguments and ideas of others, and points to gaps in the current literature. Before writing a literature review, a student should look for a model from a relevant journal or ask the instructor to point to a good example.
Picking a TopicFirst, the writer needs to pick a topic that she finds compelling and that is relevant to the course. Second, the topic should be relatively narrow so that it does not overwhelm the writer. For example, the literature on the causes of the U.S. Civil War is much too vast for a short review essay. A review of recent scholarship published on the economic impact of secession on the Confederacy is probably narrow enough for a relatively short essay. In most cases, students will need to clear a topic with the instructor before proceeding to make sure that it is a relevant topic of the proper scope.
Finding Relevant LiteratureWith the advent of electronic databases like JSTOR, Academic Search Complete, Lexis/Nexis, and Project Muse, it has become relatively easy to find relevant and trustworthy sources for a literature review essay. These and many more scholarly databases are available on the Brooklyn College Library website here:
http://dewey.brooklyn.cuny.edu/resources/?view=databases
When searching these databases, the writer needs to use keywords or phrases that are as closely associated with the topic as possible. Searching with one or two phrases surrounded by quotation marks (for example, “Civil War” in tandem with “economic impact”) will help to hone in on the most relevant results, as only articles that contain those two specific phrases will be found.
\
A. INTRODUCTION
Defines and identifies the topic and establishes the reason for the literature review.
Points to general trends in what has been published about the topic.
Explains the criteria used in analyzing and comparing articles.
B. BODY OF THE REVIEW
Groups articles into thematic clusters, or subtopics. Clusters may be grouped together chronologically,
thematically, or methodologically (see below for more on this).
Proceeds in a logical order from cluster to cluster.
Emphasizes the main findings or arguments of the articles in the student’s own words. Keeps
quotations from sources to an absolute minimum.
B.
CONCLUSION
Summarizes the major themes that emerged in the review and identifies areas of controversy in the
literature.
Pinpoints strengths and weaknesses among the articles (innovative methods used, gaps in research,
problems with theoretical frameworks, etc.).
Concludes by formulating questions that need further research within the topic, and provides some
insight into the relationship between that topic and the larger field of study or discipline.
Creating Clusters or Subtopics
Chronological Groupings: With this method, you can group material according to when it was published or the time period the material addresses. For example, for a literature review about post-1965 immigration to New York City, you might group the material that addresses the 1960s and 1970s in one section, and the 1980s and 1990s in another. This method works well in essays that trace the evolution of a certain theme or idea over time, but can be less coherent in other contexts.
Thematic Groupings: In this approach, sections might be organized around particular subthemes within the essay’s topic. For the post-1965 immigration essay mentioned above, you might organize separate sections on literature dealing with different ethnic groups: Asians, Eastern Europeans, Mexicans, etc.
Methodological Groupings: A methodological approach differs from the two above in that it does not focus so much on the content, but the “methods” of the researcher or writer. In the above example, authors who interpret demographic data from the census might be put in one group, while another group might be formed around work that uses ethnographic approaches.