Ch2 introduction to standard
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•653 views
This document discusses software engineering standards. It defines a standard as mandatory requirements that prescribe a disciplined, uniform approach to software development. Standards help specify techniques, provide consensus on best practices, and give precise names to concepts. There are approximately 315 software engineering standards maintained by 46 organizations. Standards cover processes, techniques/tools, and applicability across different domains. Using standards helps establish requirements, define common frameworks, clarify roles, and avoid reinventing proven practices. Sources of standards include organizations, professional groups, governments, and standards bodies like ISO. ISO consolidates existing technology and improves products, business, and buyer protection.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Implementing ISO 26514 in Your Workplace
The document discusses ISO/IEC 26514, a technical standard for the design and development of user documentation. It provides an overview of how ISO standards are developed, describes the requirements and process defined in ISO 26514, and outlines the benefits to technical communicators and organizations of implementing the standard. Specifically, ISO 26514 standardizes best practices for documentation processes and usability, provides criteria for organizations to claim conformance to the standard, and can improve credibility, consistency, and preparedness for both industry and academia.
Dev secops engineering-marketing-sheet
This document summarizes a DevSecOps Engineering certification course that teaches security practices for software development. The 16-hour course explains how DevSecOps security differs from other approaches and provides education on data and security sciences. Course objectives include understanding DevSecOps concepts, business-driven security strategies, and integrating security into continuous delivery workflows. Students receive a manual, participate in exercises, and can take an exam to receive the DevSecOps Engineer certificate upon passing. Prerequisites include a DevOps Foundation certificate and experience in IT development and operations.
What’s Standard? Industry Application versus University Education of Engineer...
This document summarizes a study on the use of engineering standards by students and professionals. For students, the study found that standards were integrated into design projects and safety standards were most heavily used. A survey of industry professionals found that standards identification involves client requirements, industry standards, and safety standards. Professionals acquire standards through purchases, subscriptions, and physical/digital collections. The use of standards has increased over engineers' careers as solutions have grown more complex.
DevOpsDays Jakarta Igites
1. Anthony Rees
2. David Spinks and Glaudia Califano
3. Christian Hermanus
4. Antony Marsh
5. Masto Sitorus
6. Reyhan
Ch3 introduction to iso29110
This document provides an introduction to ISO/IEC 29110, which defines standards for very small entities (VSEs) developing software. It discusses the three critical dimensions of process, roles, and responsibility. ISO/IEC 29110 aims to standardize processes for VSEs with up to 25 people. It has defined four profiles (Entry, Basic, Intermediate, Advanced) targeting different levels of VSEs. The next chapter will cover the project management process defined in ISO/IEC 29110.
Software Entrepreneurship
Software Entrepreneurship by Krit Kamtuo , MIC-Khon Kaen Manager for speaking in CS@KKU Software Industry Seminar 2011
Mapping a Privacy Framework to a Reference Model of Learning Analytics
Mapping a Privacy Framework to a Reference Model of Learning AnalyticsOpen Cyber University of Korea
Presentation of the article at Workshop of Learning Analytics & Knowledge 2016 in April 25, 2016.
Note: full paper is available on http://www.laceproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ep4la2016_paper_4.pdfCh1 introduction to spi1.0
This document provides an introduction to software process improvement (SPI). It discusses what SPI is and explains that SPI involves planning, developing measurements, and making improvements. It also outlines the basic steps that can be taken after completing an SPI course, such as understanding software standards, analyzing development experiences, evaluating processes against standards, and designing solutions for improvement. Additionally, the document presents a case study on how process improvement worked for a company called Advance Information Services Inc. It discusses their process improvement strategy which involved project planning and tracking/control. Finally, it assigns students to read a technical report on SPI and answer questions about it by a certain deadline.
Recommended
Implementing ISO 26514 in Your Workplace
The document discusses ISO/IEC 26514, a technical standard for the design and development of user documentation. It provides an overview of how ISO standards are developed, describes the requirements and process defined in ISO 26514, and outlines the benefits to technical communicators and organizations of implementing the standard. Specifically, ISO 26514 standardizes best practices for documentation processes and usability, provides criteria for organizations to claim conformance to the standard, and can improve credibility, consistency, and preparedness for both industry and academia.
Dev secops engineering-marketing-sheet
This document summarizes a DevSecOps Engineering certification course that teaches security practices for software development. The 16-hour course explains how DevSecOps security differs from other approaches and provides education on data and security sciences. Course objectives include understanding DevSecOps concepts, business-driven security strategies, and integrating security into continuous delivery workflows. Students receive a manual, participate in exercises, and can take an exam to receive the DevSecOps Engineer certificate upon passing. Prerequisites include a DevOps Foundation certificate and experience in IT development and operations.
What’s Standard? Industry Application versus University Education of Engineer...
This document summarizes a study on the use of engineering standards by students and professionals. For students, the study found that standards were integrated into design projects and safety standards were most heavily used. A survey of industry professionals found that standards identification involves client requirements, industry standards, and safety standards. Professionals acquire standards through purchases, subscriptions, and physical/digital collections. The use of standards has increased over engineers' careers as solutions have grown more complex.
DevOpsDays Jakarta Igites
1. Anthony Rees
2. David Spinks and Glaudia Califano
3. Christian Hermanus
4. Antony Marsh
5. Masto Sitorus
6. Reyhan
Ch3 introduction to iso29110
This document provides an introduction to ISO/IEC 29110, which defines standards for very small entities (VSEs) developing software. It discusses the three critical dimensions of process, roles, and responsibility. ISO/IEC 29110 aims to standardize processes for VSEs with up to 25 people. It has defined four profiles (Entry, Basic, Intermediate, Advanced) targeting different levels of VSEs. The next chapter will cover the project management process defined in ISO/IEC 29110.
Software Entrepreneurship
Software Entrepreneurship by Krit Kamtuo , MIC-Khon Kaen Manager for speaking in CS@KKU Software Industry Seminar 2011
Mapping a Privacy Framework to a Reference Model of Learning Analytics
Mapping a Privacy Framework to a Reference Model of Learning AnalyticsOpen Cyber University of Korea
Presentation of the article at Workshop of Learning Analytics & Knowledge 2016 in April 25, 2016.
Note: full paper is available on http://www.laceproject.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/ep4la2016_paper_4.pdfCh1 introduction to spi1.0
This document provides an introduction to software process improvement (SPI). It discusses what SPI is and explains that SPI involves planning, developing measurements, and making improvements. It also outlines the basic steps that can be taken after completing an SPI course, such as understanding software standards, analyzing development experiences, evaluating processes against standards, and designing solutions for improvement. Additionally, the document presents a case study on how process improvement worked for a company called Advance Information Services Inc. It discusses their process improvement strategy which involved project planning and tracking/control. Finally, it assigns students to read a technical report on SPI and answer questions about it by a certain deadline.
Ch5 software imprementation1.0
The document describes ISO/IEC 29110 for software implementation processes. It discusses the key process activities including requirements analysis, architectural and detailed design, software construction, integration and testing, product delivery, and verification and validation. Traceability is established between requirements, design, code, and tests. Test plans, cases, reports and product documentation are also outlined.
Ch0 se423 outline
This document outlines the course details for SE423 Software Process Improvement, a 3-credit course offered at CMU. The course objectives are to explain, apply, and define methods to document and improve software engineering processes using standards like ISO/IEC 29110, ISO/IEC 15504, and CMMI. Course content will cover software development standards, process assessment, definition, and improvement. Grading is based on attendance, quizzes, assignments, midterm, and final exam. Students must attend at least 80% of classes and take the final exam to pass.
Se423mid term preview
The document provides information about a software engineering exam. It states that the exam will be on August 1st from 3:30-6:30 PM and will be worth 25% of the student's final grade. The exam will consist of multiple choice questions, short answer questions, and two scenario questions. It covers chapters about software process improvement concepts, standards, ISO 29110, project management processes, software implementation, and process assessment. The document also lists exam rules - students can use dictionaries but not computing devices, they must wear their CMU uniform, there will be multiple versions of the exam, and cheating or breaking rules will result in failing all courses.
Introduction to ISO29110
The document discusses software development standards for very small entities (VSEs) published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). It provides an overview of ISO/IEC 29110, a series of standards for VSEs that define simplified processes for project management and software implementation. The document outlines the objectives and activities of the project management and software implementation processes defined in ISO/IEC 29110 to provide guidance for VSEs developing a single software application. It also defines key terms related to software engineering requirements, design, and development.
Ch4 project management process
The document discusses ISO 29110 project management processes. It describes the 7 key objectives of project management: 1) developing a project plan based on customer requirements, 2) monitoring project progress against the plan and addressing deviations, 3) managing change requests and evaluating their impact, 4) holding review meetings with stakeholders, 5) identifying and managing risks, 6) implementing version control of project items, and 7) performing quality assurance to ensure compliance with the plan and requirements. Project monitoring involves comparing actual progress to the project plan and addressing any problems in meeting targets.
Personally Identifiable Information Protection
“If we’re going to be connected, then we need to be protected. As Americans, we shouldn’t have to forfeit our basic privacy when we go online to do our business. Each of us as individuals have a sphere of privacy around us that should not be breached, whether by our government, but also by commercial interests.” These words were spoken two weeks ago by the American president Barack Obama, who urged Congress to pass a series of cybersecurity and privacy laws that will protect even more the data privacy of customers and children in schools. Once again the data Privacy and Regulation topic became newspaper headlines.
Ch 10 cost of software quality
This document discusses software quality metrics and the costs of software quality. It describes the classic model which classifies quality costs into costs of control (prevention and appraisal) and costs of failure of control (internal and external failures). Prevention costs include investments in infrastructure and regular quality activities. Appraisal costs cover reviews and testing. Internal failures are errors found before release, while external failures are found after. The document provides examples and estimates for various quality metrics.
Sqap
The document provides an overview of software development and quality assurance process standards. It discusses the benefits of using standards, prominent standards development organizations, and the classification of standards into process and management standards. The key standards covered include IEEE Std. 730 for software quality assurance, ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207 for software life cycle processes, and IEEE Std. 1012 for software verification and validation. Each standard's concepts, structure, and activities/processes are summarized at a high level.
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017-2394, USA
Copyright © 1998 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
All rights reserved. Published 1998. Printed in the United States of America.
ISBN 0-7381-0332-2
No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior
written permission of the publisher.
IEEE Std 830-1998
(Revision of
IEEE Std 830-1993)
IEEE Recommended Practice for
Software Requirements
SpeciÞcations
Sponsor
Software Engineering Standards Committee
of the
IEEE Computer Society
Approved 25 June 1998
IEEE-SA Standards Board
Abstract:
The content and qualities of a good software requirements specification (SRS) are de-
scribed and several sample SRS outlines are presented. This recommended practice is aimed at
specifying requirements of software to be developed but also can be applied to assist in the selec-
tion of in-house and commercial software products. Guidelines for compliance with IEEE/EIA
12207.1-1997 are also provided.
Keywords:
contract, customer, prototyping, software requirements specification, supplier, system
requirements specifications
IEEE Standards
documents are developed within the IEEE Societies and the Standards Coordinat-
ing Committees of the IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Standards Board. Members of the
committees serve voluntarily and without compensation. They are not necessarily members of the
Institute. The standards developed within IEEE represent a consensus of the broad expertise on the
subject within the Institute as well as those activities outside of IEEE that have expressed an inter-
est in participating in the development of the standard.
Use of an IEEE Standard is wholly voluntary. The existence of an IEEE Standard does not imply
that there are no other ways to produce, test, measure, purchase, market, or provide other goods and
services related to the scope of the IEEE Standard. Furthermore, the viewpoint expressed at the
time a standard is approved and issued is subject to change brought about through developments in
the state of the art and comments received from users of the standard. Every IEEE Standard is sub-
jected to review at least every Þve years for revision or reafÞrmation. When a document is more
than Þve years old and has not been reafÞrmed, it is reasonable to conclude that its contents,
although still of some value, do not wholly reßect the present state of the art. Users are cautioned to
check to determine that they have the latest edition of any IEEE Standard.
Comments for revision of IEEE Standards are welcome from any interested party, regardless of
membership afÞliation with IEEE. Suggestions for changes in documents should be in the form of a
proposed change of text, together with appropriate supporting comments.
Interpretations: Occasionally questions may arise regarding the meani ...
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc..docx
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017-2394, USA
Copyright © 1998 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
All rights reserved. Published 1998. Printed in the United States of America.
ISBN 0-7381-0332-2
No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior
written permission of the publisher.
IEEE Std 830-1998
(Revision of
IEEE Std 830-1993)
IEEE Recommended Practice for
Software Requirements
SpeciÞcations
Sponsor
Software Engineering Standards Committee
of the
IEEE Computer Society
Approved 25 June 1998
IEEE-SA Standards Board
Abstract:
The content and qualities of a good software requirements specification (SRS) are de-
scribed and several sample SRS outlines are presented. This recommended practice is aimed at
specifying requirements of software to be developed but also can be applied to assist in the selec-
tion of in-house and commercial software products. Guidelines for compliance with IEEE/EIA
12207.1-1997 are also provided.
Keywords:
contract, customer, prototyping, software requirements specification, supplier, system
requirements specifications
IEEE Standards
documents are developed within the IEEE Societies and the Standards Coordinat-
ing Committees of the IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Standards Board. Members of the
committees serve voluntarily and without compensation. They are not necessarily members of the
Institute. The standards developed within IEEE represent a consensus of the broad expertise on the
subject within the Institute as well as those activities outside of IEEE that have expressed an inter-
est in participating in the development of the standard.
Use of an IEEE Standard is wholly voluntary. The existence of an IEEE Standard does not imply
that there are no other ways to produce, test, measure, purchase, market, or provide other goods and
services related to the scope of the IEEE Standard. Furthermore, the viewpoint expressed at the
time a standard is approved and issued is subject to change brought about through developments in
the state of the art and comments received from users of the standard. Every IEEE Standard is sub-
jected to review at least every Þve years for revision or reafÞrmation. When a document is more
than Þve years old and has not been reafÞrmed, it is reasonable to conclude that its contents,
although still of some value, do not wholly reßect the present state of the art. Users are cautioned to
check to determine that they have the latest edition of any IEEE Standard.
Comments for revision of IEEE Standards are welcome from any interested party, regardless of
membership afÞliation with IEEE. Suggestions for changes in documents should be in the form of a
proposed change of text, together with appropriate supporting comments.
Interpretations: Occasionally questions may arise regarding the meani.
Criteria Ratings PointsIntroduction 10 to 8.0 ptsAdva
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction 10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
States the topic the
author is going to
address. The
introduction provides
a clear overview of the
paper’s contents.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
States the topic the
author is going to
address. The
introduction provides
an overview of the
paper’s contents.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
States the topic the
author is going to
address. The
introduction seems to
provide an overview of
the paper’s contents.
0 pts
Not Present
Does not state the
topic the author is
going to address.
The introduction
does not provide
an overview of the
paper’s contents.
10 pts
Analysis 50 to >44.0 pts
Advanced
The issues raised in
the topic are properly
treated. Different
viewpoints have been
considered, analyzed,
and treated. The
author provides
personal inputs.
44 to >34.0 pts
Proficient
The issues raised in
the topic are not
properly treated.
Different viewpoints
have been considered,
analyzed, and treated.
The author provides
personal inputs.
34 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The issues raised in the
topic are not properly
treated. Different
viewpoints have been
considered, analyzed,
and treated. The author
does not provide
personal inputs.
0 pts
Not Present
The author does
not provide any
analysis.
50 pts
Conclusion 10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The conclusion offers
a good summary of
issues treated in the
paper and does offer
suggestions for future
study.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
The conclusion offers
a good summary of
issues treated in the
paper but does not
offer any suggestions
for future study.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The conclusion offers a
brief summary of issues
treated in the paper but
does not offer any
suggestions for future
study.
0 pts
Not Present
There is no
conclusion.
10 pts
Headings
and
Transitions
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The transitions
between paragraphs
and sections are
clear. Proper
headings are used.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
The transitions
between paragraphs
and sections are clear.
Proper headings are
not used.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The transitions between
paragraphs and
sections are not clear.
Proper headings are not
used.
0 pts
Not Present
No transitions
between
paragraphs and
sections.
Headings are not
used.
10 pts
Spelling and
Grammar
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
There are no more
than three spelling or
grammar errors.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
There are four or five
spelling or grammar
errors.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
There are six or seven
spelling or grammar
errors.
0 pts
Not Present
There are eight or
more spelling or
grammar errors.
10 pts
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric | BUSI620_B02_202230
Criteria Ratings Points
Bibliography
and APA
style
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The bibliography
contains at least 3
scholarly sources. The
paper is in current
APA style.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
The bibliography
contains less than 3
scholarly sources. The
paper is in current APA
style.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The bi ...
CRJS466 – Psychopathology and CriminalityUnit 5 Individual Proje.docx
CRJS466 – Psychopathology and Criminality
Unit 5 Individual Project Grading Criteria
(125 points)
Content (75 points):
Question 1 (20 points)
Question 2 (20 points)
Question 3 (15 points)
Question 4 (20 points)
Organization (25 points):
Clarity and conciseness of thought, minimum page length
APA Formatting (12.5 points):
Title page with Running head, page numbers, 12-pt. Times New Roman or
Arial font, 1” margins, spacing, in-text citations, and References (minimum of
three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources)
Mechanics (12.5 points):
Grammar, spelling/word usage, punctuation
______________________________________________________________________
For the Unit 5 IP, below are the specific questions and my expectations:
In a 3–5 page position paper, respond to the following:
(1) Articulate the mental disorder being considered by the court in the case that you selected, and why this disorder would make the defendant unfit for trial.
**Based on information and knowledge gathered from the DSM-IV-TR or DSM-5, course text, Live Chats, Learning Materials, and other peer-reviewed/scholarly sources, determine ONE possible mental disorder being considered. Discuss your rationale as to why you selected the diagnosis for this particular case. Before choosing a disorder, think about the defendant's mental status, including appearance, attitude, behavior, mood and affect, speech, thought process, thought content, perception, cognition, insight, and judgment.
(2) Explain the relationship between the actions and behavior that would cause the court to remand the defendant for a mental evaluation.
**Address the association between the actions or offenses of the defendant and the mental disorder associated with the offense.
(3) Evaluate the outcome of the case you selected in terms of the defendant, the victim, and the community.
**Identify the impact of the trial’s outcome on the community, the victim, and the defendant.
(4) Critique and assess the court’s decision in the case you selected. Choose ONE of the following:
(a) Support the court’s correct decision.
**Discuss why you support (agree with) the court's decision. Explain your rationale.
(b) Challenge the court’s decision with your supported reasons.
**Discuss why you challenge (disagree with) the court's decision. Explain your rationale.
SWE440-1402A-01
Software Project Management
Project Plan
27 April 2014
Content
Page
1)Project Description and Methodology
3-6
2)Project Plan Outline
7-8
3)ISO & IEEE Standard
9-11
4)Configuration Management
12-16
5)Defect Tracking
17
6)Risk Management
19-22
7) Final Project Report
23
8)References
24
Project Description and Methodology
The IT ecosystem of financial services institutions faces many challenges in aligning business needs with IT solutions which generally.
Rekayasa-Perangkat-Lunak-Pertemuan-1.ppt
Teknokrat_Auliya Rahman has scheduled a Zoom meeting for the RPL IF 21 B topic on February 21, 2023 at 01:30 PM Bangkok time. The meeting ID is 762 2247 5615 and passcode is 123. Students are required to have their cameras on, dress appropriately, mute their microphones except during discussions and pay full attention to the materials presented. Other activities are prohibited during the meeting unless permitted by the instructor.
se
This document provides an overview of basic concepts in software engineering. It discusses that computer science focuses on theory while software engineering focuses on practical development and delivery. The software process involves activities like specification, development, validation and evolution. Process models represent the software process from different perspectives. Roughly 60% of costs are development costs and 40% are testing costs, with evolution costs often exceeding development costs. Structured approaches to software development include models, rules, recommendations and process guidance. CASE tools provide automated support for software process activities. Good software should have required functionality and be maintainable, dependable, usable and efficient. Professional responsibilities include behaving ethically and upholding principles like confidentiality, competence, intellectual property rights and avoiding computer misuse
ISO 29110 Software Quality Model For Software SMEs
ISO 29110 model in 2017
Systems and Software Life Cycle Profiles and Guidelines for Very Small Entities (VSEs) International Standards (IS) and Technical Reports (TR) are targeted at Very Small Entities (VSEs). A Very Small Entity (VSE) is an enterprise, an organization, a department or a project having up to 25 people. The ISO/IEC 29110 is a series of international standards entitled "Systems and Software Engineering — Lifecycle Profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs)"
Planning for software quality assurance lecture 6
The document discusses planning for software quality assurance (SQA) and outlines the key elements of a software quality assurance plan (SQAP). It notes that an SQAP provides a roadmap for SQA activities and defines techniques, procedures, and methodologies that will be used to ensure timely delivery of software that meets requirements. The document then describes various sections that should be included in an SQAP, such as goals, tasks, standards, reviews, testing, problem reporting, tools, code control, and training. It also discusses the IEEE standard for SQAPs and provides examples of what types of information should be included in each SQAP section.
Abu Dhabi Building Codes & Standards-Final.pdf
The aim of this course is to introduce the required skill for understanding the importance, application, use, and management of various buildings and constructions codes, regulations, specifications and standards around the world; especially in UAE (Abu Dhabi).
Testing Standards
This document summarizes standards used in software testing. It identifies institutions that create testing standards like ISO, BSI, and ANSI. It outlines selected international standards including ISO 9000, 9126, and 12207 as well as British standards like BS4778, 5515, and 5887. It also discusses ANSI-IEEE standards 610.12 and 829 and defines what standards are and their role in demonstrating professional testing and ensuring consistency.
Ch1
This document introduces software engineering and discusses its importance, key topics, and professional and ethical responsibilities. It defines software engineering, compares it to computer science and system engineering, and explains software processes and models. It also covers frequently asked questions about software engineering, costs, methods, challenges, and a code of ethics for professional responsibility.
Introduction to Software Engineering SE1
This document introduces software engineering and discusses its importance, key topics, and professional and ethical responsibilities. It defines software engineering, compares it to computer science and system engineering, and explains software processes and models. It also covers frequently asked questions about software engineering, costs, methods, challenges, and a code of ethics for professional responsibility.
1
Software engineering involves developing software programs and documentation. It aims to introduce key concepts, discuss professional responsibilities, and address common questions. Topics covered include defining software engineering, discussing costs and challenges, and explaining ethical issues. Software engineering is important because modern economies rely on software and costs are significant. Professional responsibilities include maintaining confidentiality, competence, and intellectual property rights.
Software coding and testing
This document discusses software coding standards and testing. It includes four lessons:
Lesson One discusses coding standards, which define programming style through rules for formatting source code. Coding standards help make code more readable, maintainable, and reduce costs. Common aspects of coding standards include naming conventions and formatting.
Lesson Two discusses software testing strategies and principles. Testing strategies provide a plan for defining the testing approach. Common strategies include analytic, model-based, and methodical testing. Key principles of testing include showing presence of defects, early testing, and that exhaustive testing is impossible.
Lesson Three discusses software testing approaches and types but does not provide details.
Lesson Four discusses alpha and beta testing as
More Related Content
Viewers also liked
Ch5 software imprementation1.0
The document describes ISO/IEC 29110 for software implementation processes. It discusses the key process activities including requirements analysis, architectural and detailed design, software construction, integration and testing, product delivery, and verification and validation. Traceability is established between requirements, design, code, and tests. Test plans, cases, reports and product documentation are also outlined.
Ch0 se423 outline
This document outlines the course details for SE423 Software Process Improvement, a 3-credit course offered at CMU. The course objectives are to explain, apply, and define methods to document and improve software engineering processes using standards like ISO/IEC 29110, ISO/IEC 15504, and CMMI. Course content will cover software development standards, process assessment, definition, and improvement. Grading is based on attendance, quizzes, assignments, midterm, and final exam. Students must attend at least 80% of classes and take the final exam to pass.
Se423mid term preview
The document provides information about a software engineering exam. It states that the exam will be on August 1st from 3:30-6:30 PM and will be worth 25% of the student's final grade. The exam will consist of multiple choice questions, short answer questions, and two scenario questions. It covers chapters about software process improvement concepts, standards, ISO 29110, project management processes, software implementation, and process assessment. The document also lists exam rules - students can use dictionaries but not computing devices, they must wear their CMU uniform, there will be multiple versions of the exam, and cheating or breaking rules will result in failing all courses.
Introduction to ISO29110
The document discusses software development standards for very small entities (VSEs) published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO). It provides an overview of ISO/IEC 29110, a series of standards for VSEs that define simplified processes for project management and software implementation. The document outlines the objectives and activities of the project management and software implementation processes defined in ISO/IEC 29110 to provide guidance for VSEs developing a single software application. It also defines key terms related to software engineering requirements, design, and development.
Ch4 project management process
The document discusses ISO 29110 project management processes. It describes the 7 key objectives of project management: 1) developing a project plan based on customer requirements, 2) monitoring project progress against the plan and addressing deviations, 3) managing change requests and evaluating their impact, 4) holding review meetings with stakeholders, 5) identifying and managing risks, 6) implementing version control of project items, and 7) performing quality assurance to ensure compliance with the plan and requirements. Project monitoring involves comparing actual progress to the project plan and addressing any problems in meeting targets.
Personally Identifiable Information Protection
“If we’re going to be connected, then we need to be protected. As Americans, we shouldn’t have to forfeit our basic privacy when we go online to do our business. Each of us as individuals have a sphere of privacy around us that should not be breached, whether by our government, but also by commercial interests.” These words were spoken two weeks ago by the American president Barack Obama, who urged Congress to pass a series of cybersecurity and privacy laws that will protect even more the data privacy of customers and children in schools. Once again the data Privacy and Regulation topic became newspaper headlines.
Ch 10 cost of software quality
This document discusses software quality metrics and the costs of software quality. It describes the classic model which classifies quality costs into costs of control (prevention and appraisal) and costs of failure of control (internal and external failures). Prevention costs include investments in infrastructure and regular quality activities. Appraisal costs cover reviews and testing. Internal failures are errors found before release, while external failures are found after. The document provides examples and estimates for various quality metrics.
Viewers also liked (7)
Similar to Ch2 introduction to standard
Sqap
The document provides an overview of software development and quality assurance process standards. It discusses the benefits of using standards, prominent standards development organizations, and the classification of standards into process and management standards. The key standards covered include IEEE Std. 730 for software quality assurance, ISO/IEC/IEEE 12207 for software life cycle processes, and IEEE Std. 1012 for software verification and validation. Each standard's concepts, structure, and activities/processes are summarized at a high level.
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017-2394, USA
Copyright © 1998 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
All rights reserved. Published 1998. Printed in the United States of America.
ISBN 0-7381-0332-2
No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior
written permission of the publisher.
IEEE Std 830-1998
(Revision of
IEEE Std 830-1993)
IEEE Recommended Practice for
Software Requirements
SpeciÞcations
Sponsor
Software Engineering Standards Committee
of the
IEEE Computer Society
Approved 25 June 1998
IEEE-SA Standards Board
Abstract:
The content and qualities of a good software requirements specification (SRS) are de-
scribed and several sample SRS outlines are presented. This recommended practice is aimed at
specifying requirements of software to be developed but also can be applied to assist in the selec-
tion of in-house and commercial software products. Guidelines for compliance with IEEE/EIA
12207.1-1997 are also provided.
Keywords:
contract, customer, prototyping, software requirements specification, supplier, system
requirements specifications
IEEE Standards
documents are developed within the IEEE Societies and the Standards Coordinat-
ing Committees of the IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Standards Board. Members of the
committees serve voluntarily and without compensation. They are not necessarily members of the
Institute. The standards developed within IEEE represent a consensus of the broad expertise on the
subject within the Institute as well as those activities outside of IEEE that have expressed an inter-
est in participating in the development of the standard.
Use of an IEEE Standard is wholly voluntary. The existence of an IEEE Standard does not imply
that there are no other ways to produce, test, measure, purchase, market, or provide other goods and
services related to the scope of the IEEE Standard. Furthermore, the viewpoint expressed at the
time a standard is approved and issued is subject to change brought about through developments in
the state of the art and comments received from users of the standard. Every IEEE Standard is sub-
jected to review at least every Þve years for revision or reafÞrmation. When a document is more
than Þve years old and has not been reafÞrmed, it is reasonable to conclude that its contents,
although still of some value, do not wholly reßect the present state of the art. Users are cautioned to
check to determine that they have the latest edition of any IEEE Standard.
Comments for revision of IEEE Standards are welcome from any interested party, regardless of
membership afÞliation with IEEE. Suggestions for changes in documents should be in the form of a
proposed change of text, together with appropriate supporting comments.
Interpretations: Occasionally questions may arise regarding the meani ...
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc..docx
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
345 East 47th Street, New York, NY 10017-2394, USA
Copyright © 1998 by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
All rights reserved. Published 1998. Printed in the United States of America.
ISBN 0-7381-0332-2
No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form, in an electronic retrieval system or otherwise, without the prior
written permission of the publisher.
IEEE Std 830-1998
(Revision of
IEEE Std 830-1993)
IEEE Recommended Practice for
Software Requirements
SpeciÞcations
Sponsor
Software Engineering Standards Committee
of the
IEEE Computer Society
Approved 25 June 1998
IEEE-SA Standards Board
Abstract:
The content and qualities of a good software requirements specification (SRS) are de-
scribed and several sample SRS outlines are presented. This recommended practice is aimed at
specifying requirements of software to be developed but also can be applied to assist in the selec-
tion of in-house and commercial software products. Guidelines for compliance with IEEE/EIA
12207.1-1997 are also provided.
Keywords:
contract, customer, prototyping, software requirements specification, supplier, system
requirements specifications
IEEE Standards
documents are developed within the IEEE Societies and the Standards Coordinat-
ing Committees of the IEEE Standards Association (IEEE-SA) Standards Board. Members of the
committees serve voluntarily and without compensation. They are not necessarily members of the
Institute. The standards developed within IEEE represent a consensus of the broad expertise on the
subject within the Institute as well as those activities outside of IEEE that have expressed an inter-
est in participating in the development of the standard.
Use of an IEEE Standard is wholly voluntary. The existence of an IEEE Standard does not imply
that there are no other ways to produce, test, measure, purchase, market, or provide other goods and
services related to the scope of the IEEE Standard. Furthermore, the viewpoint expressed at the
time a standard is approved and issued is subject to change brought about through developments in
the state of the art and comments received from users of the standard. Every IEEE Standard is sub-
jected to review at least every Þve years for revision or reafÞrmation. When a document is more
than Þve years old and has not been reafÞrmed, it is reasonable to conclude that its contents,
although still of some value, do not wholly reßect the present state of the art. Users are cautioned to
check to determine that they have the latest edition of any IEEE Standard.
Comments for revision of IEEE Standards are welcome from any interested party, regardless of
membership afÞliation with IEEE. Suggestions for changes in documents should be in the form of a
proposed change of text, together with appropriate supporting comments.
Interpretations: Occasionally questions may arise regarding the meani.
Criteria Ratings PointsIntroduction 10 to 8.0 ptsAdva
Criteria Ratings Points
Introduction 10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
States the topic the
author is going to
address. The
introduction provides
a clear overview of the
paper’s contents.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
States the topic the
author is going to
address. The
introduction provides
an overview of the
paper’s contents.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
States the topic the
author is going to
address. The
introduction seems to
provide an overview of
the paper’s contents.
0 pts
Not Present
Does not state the
topic the author is
going to address.
The introduction
does not provide
an overview of the
paper’s contents.
10 pts
Analysis 50 to >44.0 pts
Advanced
The issues raised in
the topic are properly
treated. Different
viewpoints have been
considered, analyzed,
and treated. The
author provides
personal inputs.
44 to >34.0 pts
Proficient
The issues raised in
the topic are not
properly treated.
Different viewpoints
have been considered,
analyzed, and treated.
The author provides
personal inputs.
34 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The issues raised in the
topic are not properly
treated. Different
viewpoints have been
considered, analyzed,
and treated. The author
does not provide
personal inputs.
0 pts
Not Present
The author does
not provide any
analysis.
50 pts
Conclusion 10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The conclusion offers
a good summary of
issues treated in the
paper and does offer
suggestions for future
study.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
The conclusion offers
a good summary of
issues treated in the
paper but does not
offer any suggestions
for future study.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The conclusion offers a
brief summary of issues
treated in the paper but
does not offer any
suggestions for future
study.
0 pts
Not Present
There is no
conclusion.
10 pts
Headings
and
Transitions
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The transitions
between paragraphs
and sections are
clear. Proper
headings are used.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
The transitions
between paragraphs
and sections are clear.
Proper headings are
not used.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The transitions between
paragraphs and
sections are not clear.
Proper headings are not
used.
0 pts
Not Present
No transitions
between
paragraphs and
sections.
Headings are not
used.
10 pts
Spelling and
Grammar
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
There are no more
than three spelling or
grammar errors.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
There are four or five
spelling or grammar
errors.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
There are six or seven
spelling or grammar
errors.
0 pts
Not Present
There are eight or
more spelling or
grammar errors.
10 pts
Research or Interview Paper Grading Rubric | BUSI620_B02_202230
Criteria Ratings Points
Bibliography
and APA
style
10 to >8.0 pts
Advanced
The bibliography
contains at least 3
scholarly sources. The
paper is in current
APA style.
8 to >6.0 pts
Proficient
The bibliography
contains less than 3
scholarly sources. The
paper is in current APA
style.
6 to >0.0 pts
Developing
The bi ...
CRJS466 – Psychopathology and CriminalityUnit 5 Individual Proje.docx
CRJS466 – Psychopathology and Criminality
Unit 5 Individual Project Grading Criteria
(125 points)
Content (75 points):
Question 1 (20 points)
Question 2 (20 points)
Question 3 (15 points)
Question 4 (20 points)
Organization (25 points):
Clarity and conciseness of thought, minimum page length
APA Formatting (12.5 points):
Title page with Running head, page numbers, 12-pt. Times New Roman or
Arial font, 1” margins, spacing, in-text citations, and References (minimum of
three peer-reviewed, scholarly sources)
Mechanics (12.5 points):
Grammar, spelling/word usage, punctuation
______________________________________________________________________
For the Unit 5 IP, below are the specific questions and my expectations:
In a 3–5 page position paper, respond to the following:
(1) Articulate the mental disorder being considered by the court in the case that you selected, and why this disorder would make the defendant unfit for trial.
**Based on information and knowledge gathered from the DSM-IV-TR or DSM-5, course text, Live Chats, Learning Materials, and other peer-reviewed/scholarly sources, determine ONE possible mental disorder being considered. Discuss your rationale as to why you selected the diagnosis for this particular case. Before choosing a disorder, think about the defendant's mental status, including appearance, attitude, behavior, mood and affect, speech, thought process, thought content, perception, cognition, insight, and judgment.
(2) Explain the relationship between the actions and behavior that would cause the court to remand the defendant for a mental evaluation.
**Address the association between the actions or offenses of the defendant and the mental disorder associated with the offense.
(3) Evaluate the outcome of the case you selected in terms of the defendant, the victim, and the community.
**Identify the impact of the trial’s outcome on the community, the victim, and the defendant.
(4) Critique and assess the court’s decision in the case you selected. Choose ONE of the following:
(a) Support the court’s correct decision.
**Discuss why you support (agree with) the court's decision. Explain your rationale.
(b) Challenge the court’s decision with your supported reasons.
**Discuss why you challenge (disagree with) the court's decision. Explain your rationale.
SWE440-1402A-01
Software Project Management
Project Plan
27 April 2014
Content
Page
1)Project Description and Methodology
3-6
2)Project Plan Outline
7-8
3)ISO & IEEE Standard
9-11
4)Configuration Management
12-16
5)Defect Tracking
17
6)Risk Management
19-22
7) Final Project Report
23
8)References
24
Project Description and Methodology
The IT ecosystem of financial services institutions faces many challenges in aligning business needs with IT solutions which generally.
Rekayasa-Perangkat-Lunak-Pertemuan-1.ppt
Teknokrat_Auliya Rahman has scheduled a Zoom meeting for the RPL IF 21 B topic on February 21, 2023 at 01:30 PM Bangkok time. The meeting ID is 762 2247 5615 and passcode is 123. Students are required to have their cameras on, dress appropriately, mute their microphones except during discussions and pay full attention to the materials presented. Other activities are prohibited during the meeting unless permitted by the instructor.
se
This document provides an overview of basic concepts in software engineering. It discusses that computer science focuses on theory while software engineering focuses on practical development and delivery. The software process involves activities like specification, development, validation and evolution. Process models represent the software process from different perspectives. Roughly 60% of costs are development costs and 40% are testing costs, with evolution costs often exceeding development costs. Structured approaches to software development include models, rules, recommendations and process guidance. CASE tools provide automated support for software process activities. Good software should have required functionality and be maintainable, dependable, usable and efficient. Professional responsibilities include behaving ethically and upholding principles like confidentiality, competence, intellectual property rights and avoiding computer misuse
ISO 29110 Software Quality Model For Software SMEs
ISO 29110 model in 2017
Systems and Software Life Cycle Profiles and Guidelines for Very Small Entities (VSEs) International Standards (IS) and Technical Reports (TR) are targeted at Very Small Entities (VSEs). A Very Small Entity (VSE) is an enterprise, an organization, a department or a project having up to 25 people. The ISO/IEC 29110 is a series of international standards entitled "Systems and Software Engineering — Lifecycle Profiles for Very Small Entities (VSEs)"
Planning for software quality assurance lecture 6
The document discusses planning for software quality assurance (SQA) and outlines the key elements of a software quality assurance plan (SQAP). It notes that an SQAP provides a roadmap for SQA activities and defines techniques, procedures, and methodologies that will be used to ensure timely delivery of software that meets requirements. The document then describes various sections that should be included in an SQAP, such as goals, tasks, standards, reviews, testing, problem reporting, tools, code control, and training. It also discusses the IEEE standard for SQAPs and provides examples of what types of information should be included in each SQAP section.
Abu Dhabi Building Codes & Standards-Final.pdf
The aim of this course is to introduce the required skill for understanding the importance, application, use, and management of various buildings and constructions codes, regulations, specifications and standards around the world; especially in UAE (Abu Dhabi).
Testing Standards
This document summarizes standards used in software testing. It identifies institutions that create testing standards like ISO, BSI, and ANSI. It outlines selected international standards including ISO 9000, 9126, and 12207 as well as British standards like BS4778, 5515, and 5887. It also discusses ANSI-IEEE standards 610.12 and 829 and defines what standards are and their role in demonstrating professional testing and ensuring consistency.
Ch1
This document introduces software engineering and discusses its importance, key topics, and professional and ethical responsibilities. It defines software engineering, compares it to computer science and system engineering, and explains software processes and models. It also covers frequently asked questions about software engineering, costs, methods, challenges, and a code of ethics for professional responsibility.
Introduction to Software Engineering SE1
This document introduces software engineering and discusses its importance, key topics, and professional and ethical responsibilities. It defines software engineering, compares it to computer science and system engineering, and explains software processes and models. It also covers frequently asked questions about software engineering, costs, methods, challenges, and a code of ethics for professional responsibility.
1
Software engineering involves developing software programs and documentation. It aims to introduce key concepts, discuss professional responsibilities, and address common questions. Topics covered include defining software engineering, discussing costs and challenges, and explaining ethical issues. Software engineering is important because modern economies rely on software and costs are significant. Professional responsibilities include maintaining confidentiality, competence, and intellectual property rights.
Software coding and testing
This document discusses software coding standards and testing. It includes four lessons:
Lesson One discusses coding standards, which define programming style through rules for formatting source code. Coding standards help make code more readable, maintainable, and reduce costs. Common aspects of coding standards include naming conventions and formatting.
Lesson Two discusses software testing strategies and principles. Testing strategies provide a plan for defining the testing approach. Common strategies include analytic, model-based, and methodical testing. Key principles of testing include showing presence of defects, early testing, and that exhaustive testing is impossible.
Lesson Three discusses software testing approaches and types but does not provide details.
Lesson Four discusses alpha and beta testing as
26 standards
This document provides an overview of various types of architectural standards including conceptual standards like IEEE 1471 and DoDAF that define viewpoints and views, notational standards like UML and SysML, and process standards like TOGAF and RUP. It discusses the benefits of standards in promoting interoperability and network effects while also noting drawbacks like limiting flexibility. The document advises deciding when to adopt a standard based on whether in the early or late phase of a project.
Enterprise Spice Scope
This document discusses determining the scope for Enterprise SPICE, which includes deciding which disciplines and standards to include. It provides steps for determining the initial scope, including developing criteria for additional disciplines, receiving stakeholder input, and approval from an Advisory Board. Current disciplines addressed include software engineering, systems engineering, and others. Additional disciplines and standards will be determined based on relevance, need, and value to stakeholders. The scope may evolve through phases to address more disciplines over time based on experience.
Mark thomas cobit-and-frameworks
This document discusses using COBIT5 as a framework to integrate and leverage multiple IT governance best practices and standards. It begins with an introduction to the many frameworks and standards available for IT governance. It then presents COBIT5 as a way to synchronize frameworks like ITIL, TOGAF, PRINCE2 as well as standards from ISO. The rest of the document provides an example of how to use COBIT5's process reference model and goals cascade to select relevant frameworks and standards to meet an organization's business needs and IT governance goals.
IEEE 12207
Concepts from the ISO/IEC 12207 standard can help the software director and the business in general to achieve greater success with their employees
Ch 2-RE-process.pptx
This document discusses the requirements engineering (RE) process. It defines a process as a set of organized activities that transforms inputs to outputs. The RE process involves problem analysis and product description tasks that run iteratively. Key activities in the RE process include requirements elicitation, analysis, specification, validation and management. The document also discusses factors like process models, actors, variability, safety requirements, support tools, improvement and maturity levels.
Similar to Ch2 introduction to standard (20)
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc.
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc..docx
The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc..docx
Criteria Ratings PointsIntroduction 10 to 8.0 ptsAdva
Criteria Ratings PointsIntroduction 10 to 8.0 ptsAdva
CRJS466 – Psychopathology and CriminalityUnit 5 Individual Proje.docx
CRJS466 – Psychopathology and CriminalityUnit 5 Individual Proje.docx
ISO 29110 Software Quality Model For Software SMEs
ISO 29110 Software Quality Model For Software SMEs
More from Kittitouch Suteeca
Ch 9 traceability and verification
This document discusses software engineering traceability. It defines traceability and requirements traceability. Traceability allows tracking forward and backward from requirements to system features and permits verification that requirements have been implemented. Maintaining traceability provides benefits like change impact analysis, project tracking, testing and reuse. International standards like ISO 29110 and CMMI level 2 require processes for requirements traceability.
Ch 8 configuration management
The document discusses software configuration management. It describes version 1.0 and 1.1 of a software engineering document released on February 2, 2012 and June 2, 2012 respectively by author Kittitouch S. Version 1.1 added details on software configuration versions, tools for managing configuration, and a software configuration management plan. The document then discusses software configuration, management, and control as well as accurate versioning. It describes configuration items, versions, and numerating conventions. The summary provides an overview of the key topics and changes covered in the document.
Ch 7 integrating quality activities in the projectlife cycle
The document describes Kittitouch S.'s software engineering course covering various topics:
- Software development methodologies like waterfall, prototyping, spiral, and object-oriented models.
- Factors affecting quality assurance activities and models for quality assurance planning.
- Key software engineering concepts like verification, validation, and qualification.
- A model for evaluating the effectiveness and costs of software quality assurance plans and defect removal activities.
The document includes three revisions by Kittitouch between January and May 2012 with added topics in each revision.
Ch 6 development plan and quality plan
The document discusses elements that should be included in development and quality plans for software projects. It provides details on what should be covered in each plan, including deliverables, milestones, risks, resources, and testing. The development plan should define project scope, schedule, roles and tasks, while the quality plan outlines goals, reviews, tests and configuration management. Both plans are major elements for meeting standards like ISO29110 and CMMI. The document uses examples to illustrate how elements in each plan can be specified, such as deliverables tables, review activities, and test cases.
Ch 5 contract review
This document discusses contract reviews in software engineering projects. It describes stages of contract review including reviewing proposals before submission and reviewing contracts before signing. It outlines objectives of these reviews such as clarifying requirements, examining risks, and ensuring all agreements are documented correctly. Factors that impact the extent of review include project magnitude, complexity, and experience level. Reviewers can include proposal team members, outside experts, or a separate professional. Checklists are provided for reviewing proposals and contracts. Internal projects within an organization are also discussed as sometimes lacking a full customer-supplier relationship.
Ch 4 components of the sqa system
This document discusses software quality assurance (SQA) systems. It describes six main components of an SQA system: pre-project, project life cycle, infrastructure for error prevention/improvement, management, standards/certification/assessment, and organization. It also discusses SQA considerations like software complexity, classification of SQA components, and factors to consider when constructing an organization's SQA system.
Ch 3 software quality factor
This document discusses software quality factors and McCall's quality factor model. It describes McCall's three main quality factor categories: product operation factors, product revision factors, and product transition factors. Under product operation factors, it outlines reliability, correctness, integrity, efficiency, and usability requirements. It then discusses product revision factors of maintainability, flexibility, and testability. Finally, it covers product transition factors including portability, reusability, and interoperability. The document provides details on the specific requirements for each quality factor.
Ch 2 what is software quality
This document discusses software engineering and software quality assurance. It begins by defining software and describing a case study on the Therac-25 radiation therapy machine which suffered from a software failure disaster. It then covers classification of causes of software errors, definitions of software quality from IEEE and Pressman, and objectives of SQA activities. Key causes of errors listed include faulty requirements, client-developer communication failures, deliberate deviations from requirements, logical design errors, coding errors, non-compliance with documentation, shortcomings in testing, procedure errors, and documentation errors. The document also discusses definitions of quality assurance and quality control and the goals of SQA in software development and maintenance.
Ch 1 the software quality assurance challange
This document discusses software engineering and quality assurance. It begins by outlining the uniqueness of software quality assurance and the different environments for which SQA methods are developed.
It then provides an example of a failed software implementation at the Denver International Airport in 1995. The new airport's opening was delayed by 16 months due to failures in their software-based baggage handling system, costing $2 billion.
The document identifies three main differences between ensuring quality in software products versus other industrial products: 1) Software is usually more complex with more operational modes; 2) Software is invisible so defects are not easily detectable; 3) Opportunities to detect defects in software are limited to the development phase, unlike other products which have
Ch 0 introduction to se422
This document provides information about the Software Quality Assurance course (SE 422) at the College of Arts, Media and Technology at CMU. The course has prerequisites of Introduction to SE. Over 10 weeks, topics will include quality factors, standards, processes, reviews, configuration management, and verification. The goal is for students to understand quality components, apply standards and processes, use reviews and configuration management, and apply verification techniques. Grading will be based on attendance, quizzes, assignments, a midterm, and final exam.
Ch 12(spi)cm mi scampi
The document discusses the Standard CMMI Appraisal Method for Process Improvement (SCAMPI). SCAMPI is designed to provide benchmark quality ratings relative to the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI) and satisfies requirements for a Class A appraisal method. The document provides examples of using SCAMPI to conduct appraisals at Maturity Level 2, including rating process attributes, examples assessing process areas, and scoring. Key practices and artifacts considered for requirements management are also outlined.
Ch 11(spi)relationship pa
The document discusses Integrated Product and Process Development (IPPD), which is a Department of Defense management technique that simultaneously integrates all essential activities through multidisciplinary teams. IPPD provides a systematic approach to product development that achieves timely collaboration throughout the product life cycle to satisfy customer needs. The document then outlines the tenets of IPPD and how it relates to the CMMI process areas at different maturity levels. It also discusses the Rational Unified Process (RUP) framework and its iterative development cycle.
Ch 10(spi)cm mi-cm-ppqa
This document describes configuration management (CM) and process and product quality assurance (PPQA), two process areas in the CMMI framework. For CM, it provides details on the specific goals of establishing baselines, tracking and controlling changes, and establishing integrity. For each specific goal it describes the specific practices such as identifying configuration items, establishing a configuration management system, and performing configuration audits. For PPQA, it gives an overview of objectively evaluating processes, work products, and services to provide feedback and address noncompliance issues.
Ch 10(spi)cm mi-cm-ppqa
The document describes configuration management and process and product quality assurance. For configuration management, it discusses the specific goals of establishing baselines, tracking and controlling changes, and establishing integrity. It provides details on specific practices such as identifying configuration items, establishing a configuration management system, and creating/releasing baselines. For process and product quality assurance, it discusses the specific goal of objectively evaluating processes and work products and providing objective insight by communicating issues.
Ch 9(spi)cm mi reqm
The document describes the key aspects of managing requirements according to the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI). It discusses the specific goals, specific practices, generic goals, and generic practices for the Requirements Management process area. The specific goals cover obtaining and maintaining an understanding of requirements, managing changes to requirements, and ensuring traceability between requirements. The generic practices provide guidance on establishing policy, planning, resourcing, monitoring, and improving the requirements management process.
Ch 8(spi)cm mi-pp
The document discusses project planning processes based on the Capability Maturity Model Integration (CMMI). It describes the key process areas, specific goals, and specific practices for effective project planning. Specifically, it covers the Project Planning process area which has three specific goals: (1) establish estimates for the project, (2) develop a detailed project plan, and (3) obtain commitment to the project plan from stakeholders. For each specific goal, it provides details on the typical work products and subpractices required to meet the goal. The document aims to guide project teams on how to systematically plan their projects using the CMMI framework.
Ch 7(spi)intro tocm-mi2013
The CMMI (Capability Maturity Model Integration) is a process improvement maturity model that provides best practices for developing products and services. It consists of practices that cover the product lifecycle from conception to delivery and maintenance. CMMI provides a consistent framework for process improvement that addresses productivity, performance, costs, and stakeholder satisfaction. It has two representations - staged which uses defined levels of process improvement, and continuous which characterizes improvements for individual process areas. CMMI consists of process areas that contain required components like specific goals and expected components like specific practices.
Se423mid term preview
This document provides information about a software engineering exam. It states that the exam will be on August 1st from 3:30-6:30 PM and will cover chapters 1 through 6 from the course material. The exam will consist of multiple choice, short answer, and scenario questions and will count for 25% of the student's final grade. It also outlines the rules for the exam, including what materials can be used and prohibiting personal electronic devices. Students who do not follow the exam rules will fail the course.
Data collection
This document discusses techniques for collecting objective evidence and data during a process assessment. It identifies three main classes of data - work products/items and their characteristics, testimony from process performers, and observations of the process infrastructure. Several data collection techniques are outlined, including documentation review, interviews, questionnaires, and observations. Effective interview techniques involve preparation, asking open and follow up questions, listening, and taking notes. The goal is to collect qualitative and quantitative information to evaluate process capabilities and adherence in a manner that yields objective evidence.
Ch6 performinng to asessment
1) The document discusses the process for performing software process assessments based on ISO/IEC 15504. It describes the key activities in planning, data collection, validation, rating, and reporting.
2) It also outlines the roles and responsibilities of the assessment sponsor, competent assessor, and assessors. The sponsor provides resources while the assessor ensures the assessment follows requirements.
3) The measurement framework in ISO 15504 defines capability levels and process attributes used for rating processes on a scale from 0 to 5 based on objective evidence collected.
More from Kittitouch Suteeca (20)
Ch 7 integrating quality activities in the projectlife cycle
Ch 7 integrating quality activities in the projectlife cycle
Recently uploaded
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
The choice of an operating system plays a pivotal role in shaping our computing experience. For decades, Microsoft's Windows has dominated the market, offering a familiar and widely adopted platform for personal and professional use. However, as technological advancements continue to push the boundaries of innovation, alternative operating systems have emerged, challenging the status quo and offering users a fresh perspective on computing.
One such alternative that has garnered significant attention and acclaim is Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, a sleek, powerful, and user-friendly Linux distribution that promises to redefine the way we interact with our devices. With its focus on performance, security, and customization, Nitrux Linux presents a compelling case for those seeking to break free from the constraints of proprietary software and embrace the freedom and flexibility of open-source computing.
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
This session provides introduction to UiPath Communication Mining, importance and platform overview. You will acquire a good understand of the phases in Communication Mining as we go over the platform with you. Topics covered:
• Communication Mining Overview
• Why is it important?
• How can it help today’s business and the benefits
• Phases in Communication Mining
• Demo on Platform overview
• Q/A
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...Edge AI and Vision Alliance
For the full video of this presentation, please visit: https://www.edge-ai-vision.com/2024/06/building-and-scaling-ai-applications-with-the-nx-ai-manager-a-presentation-from-network-optix/
Robin van Emden, Senior Director of Data Science at Network Optix, presents the “Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” tutorial at the May 2024 Embedded Vision Summit.
In this presentation, van Emden covers the basics of scaling edge AI solutions using the Nx tool kit. He emphasizes the process of developing AI models and deploying them globally. He also showcases the conversion of AI models and the creation of effective edge AI pipelines, with a focus on pre-processing, model conversion, selecting the appropriate inference engine for the target hardware and post-processing.
van Emden shows how Nx can simplify the developer’s life and facilitate a rapid transition from concept to production-ready applications.He provides valuable insights into developing scalable and efficient edge AI solutions, with a strong focus on practical implementation.UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 5. In this session, we will cover CI/CD with devops.
Topics covered:
CI/CD with in UiPath
End-to-end overview of CI/CD pipeline with Azure devops
Speaker:
Lyndsey Byblow, Test Suite Sales Engineer @ UiPath, Inc.
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
Everything I found interesting about machines behaving intelligently during May 2024
Artificial Intelligence for XMLDevelopment
In the rapidly evolving landscape of technologies, XML continues to play a vital role in structuring, storing, and transporting data across diverse systems. The recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) present new methodologies for enhancing XML development workflows, introducing efficiency, automation, and intelligent capabilities. This presentation will outline the scope and perspective of utilizing AI in XML development. The potential benefits and the possible pitfalls will be highlighted, providing a balanced view of the subject.
We will explore the capabilities of AI in understanding XML markup languages and autonomously creating structured XML content. Additionally, we will examine the capacity of AI to enrich plain text with appropriate XML markup. Practical examples and methodological guidelines will be provided to elucidate how AI can be effectively prompted to interpret and generate accurate XML markup.
Further emphasis will be placed on the role of AI in developing XSLT, or schemas such as XSD and Schematron. We will address the techniques and strategies adopted to create prompts for generating code, explaining code, or refactoring the code, and the results achieved.
The discussion will extend to how AI can be used to transform XML content. In particular, the focus will be on the use of AI XPath extension functions in XSLT, Schematron, Schematron Quick Fixes, or for XML content refactoring.
The presentation aims to deliver a comprehensive overview of AI usage in XML development, providing attendees with the necessary knowledge to make informed decisions. Whether you’re at the early stages of adopting AI or considering integrating it in advanced XML development, this presentation will cover all levels of expertise.
By highlighting the potential advantages and challenges of integrating AI with XML development tools and languages, the presentation seeks to inspire thoughtful conversation around the future of XML development. We’ll not only delve into the technical aspects of AI-powered XML development but also discuss practical implications and possible future directions.
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Mike Del Balso, CEO & Co-Founder at Tecton, presents "Full RAG," a novel approach to AI recommendation systems, aiming to push beyond the limitations of traditional models through a deep integration of contextual insights and real-time data, leveraging the Retrieval-Augmented Generation architecture. This talk will outline Full RAG's potential to significantly enhance personalization, address engineering challenges such as data management and model training, and introduce data enrichment with reranking as a key solution. Attendees will gain crucial insights into the importance of hyperpersonalization in AI, the capabilities of Full RAG for advanced personalization, and strategies for managing complex data integrations for deploying cutting-edge AI solutions.
Microsoft - Power Platform_G.Aspiotis.pdf
Revolutionizing Application Development
with AI-powered low-code, presentation by George Aspiotis, Sr. Partner Development Manager, Microsoft
20240607 QFM018 Elixir Reading List May 2024
Everything I found interesting about the Elixir programming ecosystem in May 2024
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
In this second installment of our Essentials of Automations webinar series, we’ll explore the landscape of triggers and actions, guiding you through the nuances of authoring and adapting workspaces for seamless automations. Gain an understanding of the full spectrum of triggers and actions available in FME, empowering you to enhance your workspaces for efficient automation.
We’ll kick things off by showcasing the most commonly used event-based triggers, introducing you to various automation workflows like manual triggers, schedules, directory watchers, and more. Plus, see how these elements play out in real scenarios.
Whether you’re tweaking your current setup or building from the ground up, this session will arm you with the tools and insights needed to transform your FME usage into a powerhouse of productivity. Join us to discover effective strategies that simplify complex processes, enhancing your productivity and transforming your data management practices with FME. Let’s turn complexity into clarity and make your workspaces work wonders!
“I’m still / I’m still / Chaining from the Block”
“An Outlook of the Ongoing and Future Relationship between Blockchain Technologies and Process-aware Information Systems.” Invited talk at the joint workshop on Blockchain for Information Systems (BC4IS) and Blockchain for Trusted Data Sharing (B4TDS), co-located with with the 36th International Conference on Advanced Information Systems Engineering (CAiSE), 3 June 2024, Limassol, Cyprus.
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
Maruthi Prithivirajan, Head of ASEAN & IN Solution Architecture, Neo4j
Get an inside look at the latest Neo4j innovations that enable relationship-driven intelligence at scale. Learn more about the newest cloud integrations and product enhancements that make Neo4j an essential choice for developers building apps with interconnected data and generative AI.
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Discover how MongoDB Atlas and vector search technology can revolutionize your application's search capabilities. This comprehensive presentation covers:
* What is Vector Search?
* Importance and benefits of vector search
* Practical use cases across various industries
* Step-by-step implementation guide
* Live demos with code snippets
* Enhancing LLM capabilities with vector search
* Best practices and optimization strategies
Perfect for developers, AI enthusiasts, and tech leaders. Learn how to leverage MongoDB Atlas to deliver highly relevant, context-aware search results, transforming your data retrieval process. Stay ahead in tech innovation and maximize the potential of your applications.
#MongoDB #VectorSearch #AI #SemanticSearch #TechInnovation #DataScience #LLM #MachineLearning #SearchTechnology
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
As the digital landscape continually evolves, operating systems play a critical role in shaping user experiences and productivity. The launch of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 marks a significant milestone, offering a robust alternative to traditional systems such as Windows 11. This article delves into the essence of Nitrux Linux 3.5.0, exploring its unique features, advantages, and how it stands as a compelling choice for both casual users and tech enthusiasts.
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
Everything I found interesting about the irresponsible use of machine intelligence in May 2024
Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany
Consult the full report at https://www.oecd.org/digital/oecd-artificial-intelligence-review-of-germany-609808d6-en.htm
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 6. In this session, we will cover Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI webinar offers an in-depth exploration of leveraging cutting-edge technologies for test automation within the UiPath platform. Attendees will delve into the integration of generative AI, a test automation solution, with Open AI advanced natural language processing capabilities.
Throughout the session, participants will discover how this synergy empowers testers to automate repetitive tasks, enhance testing accuracy, and expedite the software testing life cycle. Topics covered include the seamless integration process, practical use cases, and the benefits of harnessing AI-driven automation for UiPath testing initiatives. By attending this webinar, testers, and automation professionals can gain valuable insights into harnessing the power of AI to optimize their test automation workflows within the UiPath ecosystem, ultimately driving efficiency and quality in software development processes.
What will you get from this session?
1. Insights into integrating generative AI.
2. Understanding how this integration enhances test automation within the UiPath platform
3. Practical demonstrations
4. Exploration of real-world use cases illustrating the benefits of AI-driven test automation for UiPath
Topics covered:
What is generative AI
Test Automation with generative AI and Open AI.
UiPath integration with generative AI
Speaker:
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Recently uploaded (20)
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Why You Should Replace Windows 11 with Nitrux Linux 3.5.0 for enhanced perfor...
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
Communications Mining Series - Zero to Hero - Session 1
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...
“Building and Scaling AI Applications with the Nx AI Manager,” a Presentation...
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 5
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
20240605 QFM017 Machine Intelligence Reading List May 2024
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Full-RAG: A modern architecture for hyper-personalization
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
Essentials of Automations: The Art of Triggers and Actions in FME
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
GraphSummit Singapore | Neo4j Product Vision & Roadmap - Q2 2024
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Unlock the Future of Search with MongoDB Atlas_ Vector Search Unleashed.pdf
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
Goodbye Windows 11: Make Way for Nitrux Linux 3.5.0!
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
20240609 QFM020 Irresponsible AI Reading List May 2024
Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany
Presentation of the OECD Artificial Intelligence Review of Germany
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 6
Ch2 introduction to standard
- 1. SE423 SPI CH-2 Introduction to SE Standards Kittitouch Suteeca
- 2. What is Standard ?
- 3. Outline What is Standard Scope of SE standard Why Use Standards ? Sources of Standards ISO Software Engineering Standards Where are we?
- 4. Towards Software Engineering Profession What does it like? 1. Body of Knowledge (e.g. SWEBOK) 2. Standards 3. Best practices (i.e. techniques proven to work) 4. Education 5. Code of Ethics 6. Certification mechanism 7. Licensing mechanism
- 5. Definition Standard: Mandatory requirements employed and enforced to prescribe a disciplined uniform approach to software development, that is, mandatory conventions and practices are in fact standards. (ISO/IEC 24765, Systems and Software Engineering Vocabulary)
- 7. What is “Software Engineering”?
- 8. Software engineering standard Approximately 315 software engineering standards, guides, handbooks, and technical reports are maintained by approximately 46 professional, sector, national, and international standards organizations.
- 9. Roles of Software Engineering Standards 1. Specify techniques to develop software faster, cheaper ,better, IEEE 982.1 (Measures for Reliable SW) 2. Provide consensus validity for “best practices” that cannot be scientifically validated, IEEE 1008 (Unit Testing) 3. Provide a systematic treatment of “-ilities”, IEEE 730 (SW Quality Assurance)
- 10. Roles of Software Engineering Standards (cont‟) 4. Provide uniformity in cases where agreement is more important than small improvements, IEEE P1320.1 (IDEF0) 5. Provide a framework for communication between buyer and seller, IEEE/EIA 12207 (SW Life Cycle Processes) 6. Give precise names to concepts that are fuzzy, complex, detailed and multidimensional, IEEE 1028 (SW Reviews)
- 12. Outline What is Standard Scope of SE standard Why Use Standards ? Sources of Standards ISO Software Engineering Standards Where are we?
- 13. Scope of SE Standard Process 1.Acquisition 2.Requirements definition 3.Design 4.Code and Test 5.Integration 6.Maintenance and Operations 7.CM 8.Documentation 9.Project Management 10.Quality Assurance 11.V & V Technique/Tool 1.CASE tools 2.Languages and Notations 3.Metrics 4.Privacy 5.Process Improvement 6.Reliability 7.Safety 8.Security 9.Software reuse 10.Vocabulary Applicability 1. General 2. Defense 3. Financial 4. Medical 5. Nuclear 6. Process Control 7. Scientific 8. Shrink-wrap 9. Transportation
- 14. Software Engineering Standards Organizational Goals 1. Improve and evaluate software competence 2. Framework for two-party agreements 3. Evaluation of software products 4. Assurance of high integrity levels for software products
- 15. Outline What is Standard Scope of SE standard Why Use Standards ? Sources of Standards ISO Software Engineering Standards Where are we?
- 16. Why we need standard?
- 17. Why Use Standards? 1. Establish uniform requirements and vocabulary for development and documentation. 2. Define a common framework for software life cycle processes. 3. Clarify the roles and interfaces of participants. 4. Clarify the types and contents of documentation.
- 18. Why Use Standards? (cont‟) 5. Identify the tasks, phases, baselines, reviews, and documents needed. 6. Follow the lessons learned and proven (best) practices of the industry 7. Avoid the pitfalls and problems of the past. 8. Save time and $ by not reinventing the wheel again.
- 19. Why Use Standards? 9. Select a supplier or a developer (e.g. ISO 9000) 10. Impose requirements in a contract. 11. Impose a trade barrier.
- 20. Outline What is Standard Scope of SE standard Why Use Standards ? Sources of Standards ISO Software Engineering Standards Where are we?
- 21. Sources of Standards 1. Within an organization Documented from day-to-day activities 2. From consultants mandated to develop them. 3. From manufacturers‟ user groups (e.g. IBM) 4. From a group of companies working together.
- 22. Sources of Standards (cont‟) 5. From professional groups (e.g. IEEE) 6. From government agencies (e.g. NASA, Transport) 7. From Standards Organizations (e.g. ISO) 8. From Countries (e.g. Conseil canadiendes normes)
- 23. Software Engineering Standards: Importance 1. They consolidate existing technology into a firm basis for introducing newer technology. 2. They increase professional discipline 3. They protect the business 4. They protect the buyer 5. They improve the product
- 24. Outline What is Standard Scope of SE standard Why Use Standards ? Sources of Standards ISO Software Engineering Standards Where are we?
- 25. ISO Name of organization ISO comes from „ISOS‟ a greek word ‘Equal’
- 27. SC7 - Terms of Reference Standardization of processes, methods and supporting technologies for the engineering and management of software and systems throughout their life cycles .
- 30. Next class… Introduction to ISO/IEC 29110