The document provides details about the merger between Arcelor and Mittal Steel in 2006 that created ArcelorMittal, the world's largest steel company. It discusses the key events in the merger process, including Mittal Steel's initial offer, Arcelor's resistance attempts including a proposed merger with Severstal, and Mittal Steel increasing its offer price until Arcelor accepted a final offer of €33.5 billion. It also summarizes some of the expected synergies and gains from the merger as well as preliminary accounting adjustments made during the purchase price allocation process.
Case Study of Merger of Mittal Steel and Arcelor.
Today ArcelorMittal is the largest steel products manufacturer in the whole world. This case study entails about how the merger happened and details of it.
This presentation was a part of our Merger & Acquisition Projects.
The presentation talks about the acquisition of Arcelor by the Mittal company in the year 2006 headed by Mr. Lakshi Mittal. It is often regarded as on of the most controversial deals in the M&A industry.
Case Study of Merger of Mittal Steel and Arcelor.
Today ArcelorMittal is the largest steel products manufacturer in the whole world. This case study entails about how the merger happened and details of it.
This presentation was a part of our Merger & Acquisition Projects.
The presentation talks about the acquisition of Arcelor by the Mittal company in the year 2006 headed by Mr. Lakshi Mittal. It is often regarded as on of the most controversial deals in the M&A industry.
Tata Motors in the year 2008 acquired two of the most recognized premium segment car brand - Jaguar & Land Rover for a price tag of $2.5 billion. This presentation tells you about the history of Tata Motors, Jaguar and Land Rover, details of the deal, key motives of the merger, challenges in the merger, and both the companies current stage.
Tata Corus is the fifth largest steel maker in the world.
Tata Steel Stocks have experienced 21 per cent absolute gain since February 2007.
Fall in steel production in UK every year since 2007 . The more competitive operations in the Netherlands have fared better, with output staging a recovery in 2010 itself, with production this year up another 10 per cent.
Tata Motors in the year 2008 acquired two of the most recognized premium segment car brand - Jaguar & Land Rover for a price tag of $2.5 billion. This presentation tells you about the history of Tata Motors, Jaguar and Land Rover, details of the deal, key motives of the merger, challenges in the merger, and both the companies current stage.
Tata Corus is the fifth largest steel maker in the world.
Tata Steel Stocks have experienced 21 per cent absolute gain since February 2007.
Fall in steel production in UK every year since 2007 . The more competitive operations in the Netherlands have fared better, with output staging a recovery in 2010 itself, with production this year up another 10 per cent.
USA Election - The 2016 United States elections will be held (for the most part) on Tuesday, November 8, 2016. During this presidential election year, the President of the United States and Vice President will be elected. In addition, elections will be held for all 435 voting-member seats in the United States House of Representatives (as well as all 6 non-voting delegate seats) and 34 of the 100 seats in the United States Senate. Twelve state governorships, two territorial governorships, and numerous other state and local elections will also be contested.
Los proyectos a continuación son de estudiantes de clases de Computadora Básica Adultos que realizaron trabajos en los programas de Microsoft Excel, Word, Power Point, Publisher y Blogs individuales. Felicidades y gracias por la Oportunidad de Servir
Composites Market Industry Trends Share & Size - Recent Developments.pptxKailas S
Composites Market by Fiber Type (Glass Fiber Composites, Carbon Fiber Composites, Natural Fiber Composites), Resin Type (Thermoset Composites, Thermoplastic Composites), Manufacturing Process, End-use Industry and Region
Orient Refractories manufactures a wide range of Refractory and Monolithic products for the iron and steel industry and its clients include large domestic integrated steel producers and mini steel plants such as Steel Authority of India, Mukund Steel, Tata Iron and Steel Company, RINL – Vizag, Sunflag Iron, Lloyd Steel, Usha Martin and the Jindal Group.
ORL got listed recently as it entered into a Scheme of Arrangement with Orient Abrasives Limited (OAL) and their respective shareholders for demerger of the refractory business of OAL into Orient Refractories Ltd. The demerger was carried out in Nov’11 and the stock got listed on 9th Mar’12.
Soon thereafter, there was a change in management and shareholding control in the company. In Mar’13, Mr. S G Rajgarhia and other ex-promoters of the company sold their 43.62% stake in the company to Dutch US Holding B.V. at Rs 43/- per share and the latter also acquired another 26% equity shares from public shareholders through open offer. As on date Dutch US Holding B.V. holds 69.62% equity in the company. It is important to note here that Dutch US Holding B.V. is promoted by RHI AG.
October 2014 Edition of BEACON, A Monthly Newsletter by SIMCON.
Inside this issue:
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS : Metal
COMPANY ANALYSIS : Tata Steel
Events Report
Concept of the Month
Quiz
Did You Know?
Australia Steel Tubes Market by Product Type, Distribution Channel, End User ...IMARC Group
The Australia steel tubes market size is projected to exhibit a growth rate (CAGR) of 1.50% during 2024-2032.
More Info:- https://www.imarcgroup.com/australia-steel-tubes-market
"Impact of front-end architecture on development cost", Viktor TurskyiFwdays
I have heard many times that architecture is not important for the front-end. Also, many times I have seen how developers implement features on the front-end just following the standard rules for a framework and think that this is enough to successfully launch the project, and then the project fails. How to prevent this and what approach to choose? I have launched dozens of complex projects and during the talk we will analyze which approaches have worked for me and which have not.
UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series, part 3DianaGray10
Welcome to UiPath Test Automation using UiPath Test Suite series part 3. In this session, we will cover desktop automation along with UI automation.
Topics covered:
UI automation Introduction,
UI automation Sample
Desktop automation flow
Pradeep Chinnala, Senior Consultant Automation Developer @WonderBotz and UiPath MVP
Deepak Rai, Automation Practice Lead, Boundaryless Group and UiPath MVP
Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey 2024 by 91mobiles.pdf91mobiles
91mobiles recently conducted a Smart TV Buyer Insights Survey in which we asked over 3,000 respondents about the TV they own, aspects they look at on a new TV, and their TV buying preferences.
Transcript: Selling digital books in 2024: Insights from industry leaders - T...BookNet Canada
The publishing industry has been selling digital audiobooks and ebooks for over a decade and has found its groove. What’s changed? What has stayed the same? Where do we go from here? Join a group of leading sales peers from across the industry for a conversation about the lessons learned since the popularization of digital books, best practices, digital book supply chain management, and more.
Link to video recording: https://bnctechforum.ca/sessions/selling-digital-books-in-2024-insights-from-industry-leaders/
Presented by BookNet Canada on May 28, 2024, with support from the Department of Canadian Heritage.
GDG Cloud Southlake #33: Boule & Rebala: Effective AppSec in SDLC using Deplo...James Anderson
Effective Application Security in Software Delivery lifecycle using Deployment Firewall and DBOM
The modern software delivery process (or the CI/CD process) includes many tools, distributed teams, open-source code, and cloud platforms. Constant focus on speed to release software to market, along with the traditional slow and manual security checks has caused gaps in continuous security as an important piece in the software supply chain. Today organizations feel more susceptible to external and internal cyber threats due to the vast attack surface in their applications supply chain and the lack of end-to-end governance and risk management.
The software team must secure its software delivery process to avoid vulnerability and security breaches. This needs to be achieved with existing tool chains and without extensive rework of the delivery processes. This talk will present strategies and techniques for providing visibility into the true risk of the existing vulnerabilities, preventing the introduction of security issues in the software, resolving vulnerabilities in production environments quickly, and capturing the deployment bill of materials (DBOM).
Speakers:
Bob Boule
Robert Boule is a technology enthusiast with PASSION for technology and making things work along with a knack for helping others understand how things work. He comes with around 20 years of solution engineering experience in application security, software continuous delivery, and SaaS platforms. He is known for his dynamic presentations in CI/CD and application security integrated in software delivery lifecycle.
Gopinath Rebala
Gopinath Rebala is the CTO of OpsMx, where he has overall responsibility for the machine learning and data processing architectures for Secure Software Delivery. Gopi also has a strong connection with our customers, leading design and architecture for strategic implementations. Gopi is a frequent speaker and well-known leader in continuous delivery and integrating security into software delivery.
JMeter webinar - integration with InfluxDB and GrafanaRTTS
Watch this recorded webinar about real-time monitoring of application performance. See how to integrate Apache JMeter, the open-source leader in performance testing, with InfluxDB, the open-source time-series database, and Grafana, the open-source analytics and visualization application.
In this webinar, we will review the benefits of leveraging InfluxDB and Grafana when executing load tests and demonstrate how these tools are used to visualize performance metrics.
Length: 30 minutes
Session Overview
-------------------------------------------
During this webinar, we will cover the following topics while demonstrating the integrations of JMeter, InfluxDB and Grafana:
- What out-of-the-box solutions are available for real-time monitoring JMeter tests?
- What are the benefits of integrating InfluxDB and Grafana into the load testing stack?
- Which features are provided by Grafana?
- Demonstration of InfluxDB and Grafana using a practice web application
To view the webinar recording, go to:
https://www.rttsweb.com/jmeter-integration-webinar
Dev Dives: Train smarter, not harder – active learning and UiPath LLMs for do...UiPathCommunity
💥 Speed, accuracy, and scaling – discover the superpowers of GenAI in action with UiPath Document Understanding and Communications Mining™:
See how to accelerate model training and optimize model performance with active learning
Learn about the latest enhancements to out-of-the-box document processing – with little to no training required
Get an exclusive demo of the new family of UiPath LLMs – GenAI models specialized for processing different types of documents and messages
This is a hands-on session specifically designed for automation developers and AI enthusiasts seeking to enhance their knowledge in leveraging the latest intelligent document processing capabilities offered by UiPath.
Speakers:
👨🏫 Andras Palfi, Senior Product Manager, UiPath
👩🏫 Lenka Dulovicova, Product Program Manager, UiPath
Connector Corner: Automate dynamic content and events by pushing a buttonDianaGray10
Here is something new! In our next Connector Corner webinar, we will demonstrate how you can use a single workflow to:
Create a campaign using Mailchimp with merge tags/fields
Send an interactive Slack channel message (using buttons)
Have the message received by managers and peers along with a test email for review
But there’s more:
In a second workflow supporting the same use case, you’ll see:
Your campaign sent to target colleagues for approval
If the “Approve” button is clicked, a Jira/Zendesk ticket is created for the marketing design team
But—if the “Reject” button is pushed, colleagues will be alerted via Slack message
Join us to learn more about this new, human-in-the-loop capability, brought to you by Integration Service connectors.
And...
Speakers:
Akshay Agnihotri, Product Manager
Charlie Greenberg, Host
Slack (or Teams) Automation for Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Soluti...Jeffrey Haguewood
Sidekick Solutions uses Bonterra Impact Management (fka Social Solutions Apricot) and automation solutions to integrate data for business workflows.
We believe integration and automation are essential to user experience and the promise of efficient work through technology. Automation is the critical ingredient to realizing that full vision. We develop integration products and services for Bonterra Case Management software to support the deployment of automations for a variety of use cases.
This video focuses on the notifications, alerts, and approval requests using Slack for Bonterra Impact Management. The solutions covered in this webinar can also be deployed for Microsoft Teams.
Interested in deploying notification automations for Bonterra Impact Management? Contact us at sales@sidekicksolutionsllc.com to discuss next steps.
Search and Society: Reimagining Information Access for Radical FuturesBhaskar Mitra
The field of Information retrieval (IR) is currently undergoing a transformative shift, at least partly due to the emerging applications of generative AI to information access. In this talk, we will deliberate on the sociotechnical implications of generative AI for information access. We will argue that there is both a critical necessity and an exciting opportunity for the IR community to re-center our research agendas on societal needs while dismantling the artificial separation between the work on fairness, accountability, transparency, and ethics in IR and the rest of IR research. Instead of adopting a reactionary strategy of trying to mitigate potential social harms from emerging technologies, the community should aim to proactively set the research agenda for the kinds of systems we should build inspired by diverse explicitly stated sociotechnical imaginaries. The sociotechnical imaginaries that underpin the design and development of information access technologies needs to be explicitly articulated, and we need to develop theories of change in context of these diverse perspectives. Our guiding future imaginaries must be informed by other academic fields, such as democratic theory and critical theory, and should be co-developed with social science scholars, legal scholars, civil rights and social justice activists, and artists, among others.
GraphRAG is All You need? LLM & Knowledge GraphGuy Korland
Guy Korland, CEO and Co-founder of FalkorDB, will review two articles on the integration of language models with knowledge graphs.
1. Unifying Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: A Roadmap.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.08302
2. Microsoft Research's GraphRAG paper and a review paper on various uses of knowledge graphs:
https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/research/blog/graphrag-unlocking-llm-discovery-on-narrative-private-data/
DevOps and Testing slides at DASA ConnectKari Kakkonen
My and Rik Marselis slides at 30.5.2024 DASA Connect conference. We discuss about what is testing, then what is agile testing and finally what is Testing in DevOps. Finally we had lovely workshop with the participants trying to find out different ways to think about quality and testing in different parts of the DevOps infinity loop.
1. Case Study : Merger of ARCELLOR and MITTAL
INTRODUCTION TO CASE
ArcelorMittal is the largest steel company in the world. The company was founded in 2006 when
Arcelor and Mittal Steel company merged. The company is headquartered in Luxemberg City, in
southern Luxemberg, the former seat of Arcelor.
Arcelor Mittal produces as much as 110 million tons of steel a year, about 10 percent of world
output. The company also controls the biggest bulk handling port in Mexico, from where it
imports iron ore and exports semi-finished steel products.
Laxmi Mittal (owner of Mittal Steel) is the president and chairman. Mittal's familyl holds a
43.6% stake in this company. Counting all shareholders, 50.6% will be former Arcelor
shareholders and 49.4% will be former Mittal shareholders.
In addition to Lakshmi Mittal as president and chairman, the Board of Directors of the company
consists of eighteen non-executive members with six nominated by Mittal, three chosen
independently, six nominated by Arcelor, three chosen by existing Arcelor shareholders and
three employee representatives.
MERGER PROCESS
Mittal Steel Announcement Offer for Arcelor Merger proposal to create first 100 million ton plus
steel producer US$40 billion merger marks step change in steel sector consolidation
Mittal Steel N.V. (“Mittal Steel”) on 27 January, launched an offer to the shareholders of Arcelor
SA (“Arcelor”) which would create the world’s first 100 million ton plus steel producer. The
offer valued each Arcelor share at €28.21 which represented a 27% premium over the closing
price and all time high on Euronext Paris of Arcelor shares on 26 January 2006, a 31% premium
over the volume weighted average price in the preceding month, and a 55% premium over the
volume weighted average share price in the preceding 12 months.
This offer valued Arcelor at an equity value of €18.6 billion on a fully diluted basis.
The new company was expected to have:
– Unprecedented scale, scope and synergies
– Pro-forma* 2005 annual revenues of approximately US$69bn and EBITDA of
US$12.6bn (*IBES estimates)
– Pro-forma market capitalisation of approximately US$40 billion
– Leading positions in NAFTA, EU, Central Europe, Africa and South America
– Expected synergies of US$1 billion from purchasing, marketing and manufacturing efficiencies
– Exceptional raw material resources with a high degree of iron-ore selfsufficiency
– Reduced volatility through geographic and product diversification
2. – Security of long-term contracts through high value-added products
– Low cost profile and high growth prospects from developing markets
– Leading position across a range of key product segments
– Ability to supply customers on a global basis
– A dividend policy representing c. 25% of earnings over the cycle
HIGHLIGHTS OF THE OFFER
The offer valued each Arcelor share at €28.21 which represented a 27% premium over the
closing price of Arcelor shares on Euronext Paris as of 26 January 2006, a 31% premium over
the volume weighted average price in the preceding month, and a 55% premium over the volume
weighted average share price in the preceding 12 months. Mittal Steel offerd to acquire all of the
outstanding Arcelor shares through three offers:
- a primary mixed cash and exchange offer for Arcelor shares consisting of 4 new
Mittal Steel shares and €35.25 in cash for every 5 Arcelor shares;
- a secondary cash offer consisting of €28.21 per each Arcelor share;
- a secondary exchange offer consisting of 16 new Mittal Steel shares for every 15
Arcelor shares.
Arcelor shareholders could tender their shares in either the primary offer or either or both of the
secondary offers, but the two secondary offers will, in the aggregate, comprise 75% in Mittal
Steel shares and 25% in cash.
SYNERGIES CLAIMED:
1.1 Step change in steel sector consolidation
The combination of Mittal Steel and Arcelor represents a step change in the consolidation of the
steel sector. The combined group was expected to have approximately 320,000 employees
worldwide, annual sales of more than US$69 billion and annual crude steel production of
approximately 115 million metric tons, which represents a global market share of approximately
10 per cent by volume. This transaction was expected to create a steel company with
unprecedented scale, a strong global presence and a broad based product offering. This unique
platform was expected to provide the combined company with unrivalled financial strength and
strategic flexibility to pursue growth and value creation opportunities.
1.2 Expanding geographic footprint with leading positions in a number of regions
The geographic overlap between Mittal Steel and Arcelor was limited. This combination was
expected to create a truly global steel company with leading
3. positions in the five main regions (South America, NAFTA, European Union, Central Europe
and Africa). Geographic diversification was expected to reduce volatility for the enlarged group
while presenting numerous strategic opportunities. Through its diverse asset base in both
emerging and developed markets, the company was expected to be ideally placed to take
advantage of multiple market opportunities.
Mittal Steel’s North American activities were to be complemented by Arcelor’s strong position
in Western Europe. These developed markets had expertise in producing highly value-added
products and provided opportunities for new product development. Mittal Steel had leading
positions in emerging markets in Eastern andCentral Europe, Asia and Africa. These regions
offered low cost production, high growth prospects and in many cases, access to significant raw
material reserves.
1.3 Strengthening the range of products and solutions for global customers
The enlarged group was expected to have leading positions in a number of product segments and
have the ability to supply customers across a range of geographic regions and in end-markets
such as automotive, domestic appliances, packaging, construction and oil and gas. The company
was also expected to have a strong value-added contract business which will allow for reduced
pricing volatility.
In the automotive sector, the new group was expected to be the leader in both the
European Union and NAFTA regions and will also have leading positions in South America,
Eastern Europe, Africa and Asia. In appliance and packaging, the group was expected to be the
leader in the NAFTA region and one of the leaders in the European Union. In construction, the
group will have a leading position in most of the markets it serves and a growing presence in the
oil and gas sector. The expertise of both groups in the various applications and end markets
could be combined to develop new market opportunities.
1.4 Maximising opportunities with a global distribution and trading network
Mittal Steel and Arcelor together was expected to have the ability to optimise
production and distribution on a global basis. The international production base of the group was
expected to facilitate global sourcing of materials and products that can be directed to the
markets where they are ultimately required. The combined company’s access to a broad range of
customers enabled the group to capitalise on market opportunities and expand into new areas.
The combined company was expected to eliminate cross-border trade flows and thus generate
substantial savings.
GAINS FOR ARCELOR…
Operations in high-growth economies withlow-cost, profitable assets and localoperating
expertise in numerous emergingmarkets
Leadership position in high-end segmentsin North America, with strong R&Dcapabilities
Access to raw materials and upstreamintegration
Access to very low cost slab potential in Ukraine to serve West Europe
4. GAINS FOR MITTAL STEEL…
Leadership position in high-end segments in Western Europe, with strong R&D capabilities
Low-cost slab manufacturing in Brazil thatcan be expanded for export to Europe and
North America
Increased free float and liquidity
Successful distribution business in Europe
TAKEOVER DEFIANCE:
Arcelor later implemented a white knight defence through a transaction structure contemplating
the issuance of shares to a friendly strategic partner (SeverStal of Russia), which was also a
technique allowed in certain jurisdictions in Europe (but not in the U.K.) and used in the U.S.
Just as Arcelor took actions to protect Dofasco with the S3, Arcelor believed that an opportunity
to acquire SeverStal was consistent with Arcelor’s corporate interest and should, if possible, be
presented as a viable alternative to Mittal Steel’s original offer, which Arcelor believed was an
inadequate offer. While Arcelor had a previous mandate from its shareholders to issue the
Arcelor shares proposed to be issued to Mr. Mordashov (SeverStal’s controlling shareholder), the
Arcelor Board felt it was important to give the shareholders an opportunity to express their
opinion on the transaction, in particular given the outstanding takeover offer from Mittal Steel.
The Arcelor Board called an extraordinary meeting of shareholders on June 30, 2006, to vote on
the SeverStal transaction. Unless more than 50% of the then outstanding Arcelor shares opposed
the transaction, the merger with SeverStal would proceed. While the 50% unwind mechanism
was criticised by the market, including institutional investors, the SeverStal transaction caused
Mittal Steel to increase the price of its offer and to deliver better overall corporate governance
and other terms. And in the end, the proposed SeverStal merger was unwound as over 50% of
Arcelor’s shareholders voted to unwind it.
5. MERGER OFFER AND SUBSEQUENT NEGOTIATIONS:
Jan 27, 2006: Mittal Steel unveils €18.6b cash and share offer for Arcelor
Jan 29: Arcelor directors reject Mittal’s offer as “150 per cent hostile”, saying the companies “do
not share same vision, business model and values”
Jan 31: Jean-Claude Juncker, prime minister of Luxembourg, which holds 5.6 per cent of
Arcelor, vows to use “all necessary means” to fend off Mittal’s unsolicited offer
Feb 16: Arcelor raises 2005 dividend by 85 per cent.
Apr 4: Arcelor says it will distribute €5bn to shareholders. Raises 2005 dividend to €1.85
Apr 28: Arcelor chairman says supervisory board would think again if Mittal made a cash
bid
May 9: Mittal says it is willing to revise terms if Arcelor board recommends its bid
May 12: Arcelor says it will implement €5bn share buy-back
May 17: Mittal launches offer after regulators approve terms of the deal
May 18: Mittal raises offer by 34 per cent to €25.8bn with a 57 per cent increase in cash
component. New deal would relinquish Mittal family control of group.
May 25: Arcelor agrees to join forces with Russian steelmaker, Severstal
May 30: Leading Arcelor shareholders speak out against proposed Severstal merger
May 31: More than a third of Arcelor investors sign a letter demanding the right to vote on a deal
June 7: Arcelor agrees to meet representatives from Mittal
June 11: Arcelor formally rejects Mittal’s €25.8bn bid and reiterates plans to press ahead with
Severstal merger, but leaves the door open for an increased offer from Mittal and gives
shareholders the chance to vote
June 18: Arcelor cancels shareholder vote on Severstal
June 20: Spanish investor forces Severstal rethink after calling for management changes at
Arcelor
June 21: Severstal changes terms of its proposed merger with Arcelor to counter shareholder
6. fears
June 25: Arcelor recommends upgraded €26.9bn Mittal offer after intensive talks
Finally deal was finalised when Arcelor accepted €33.5bn offer from Mittal.
ACCOUNTING AND ADJUSTMENT:
Purchase price allocation
The Company was in the process of allocating the purchase price for its acquisition of
Arcelor. It should be noted that all of the purchase price allocation adjustments made and
reflected in the Company’s December 31, 2006, financials (Income statement and Balance sheet)
were still preliminary and could materially change as a result of the finalization of the purchase
price allocation process . It was expected that this allocation would be finalized in Q2 2007.
The Company recorded the following significant preliminary purchase price adjustments:
Inventory
Inventory was increased by $1.1 billion as of the acquisition date (August 1, 2006). The
pro forma income statement excludes the effects of this adjustment.
Tangible fixed assets
The Company is being assisted by an independent appraisal firm in valuing the tangible
fixed assets acquired and assessing the remaining useful lives of these assets. Based on
the preliminary estimates, the Company increased the value of the tangible fixed assets
acquired by $12.3 billion. The Company also assessed the remaining useful lives of
these assets and concluded that the assets acquired have a longer average remaining
useful life than previously estimated by Arcelor. The Company therefore estimates, on a
preliminary basis, the annual additional depreciation charge to be insignificant.
Goodwill
As a result of the preliminary purchase price allocation, the Company currently estimates
goodwill related to the acquisition of Arcelor at $6.6 billion. This amount is still preliminary and
could materially change as a result of the finalization of the purchase price allocation process.