Corporate
Restructuring
Your LogoNiranjan
Sandeep kumar
Introduction to the Companies
MITTALSTEEL:
Was the largest producer of steel in terms of volume.
Based in Netherlands. Founded in 1989 as Ispat International in Sumatra,
Indonesia.
ARCELOR:
Was the second largest producer of steel in terms of turnover and output.
Created by the merger of three companies: Aceralia (Spain), Arbed
(Luxembourg),Usinor (France)
A Glimpse of Company’s Operations…
Headquarters of ArcelorMittal in
Luxembourg
The Initial Attempts….
1.The first bid made by Mittal was at a premium of 27%.
2.In late May, Mittal increased this bid by 34%.
3.Finally, the last bid was increased by 14% implicating the
purchase ofArcelor’s share at a premium of 93%.
4.The agreement was finalized at the total buy out price of $33.8
billion in cash and stock.
5.The new bid was valued at $50.54 per Arcelor share.
Deal finally clinched when the shareholders of
Arcelor agreed
to Mittal Steel’s offer – In June 2006
# Mittal raised its valuation of Arcelor to $32.9
billion.
# The Mittal family holds 43 percent of the
combined group.
# The combined company holds 10 percent of the
global market
for steel.
• Laxmi Mittal believed that the acquisition would terminate its biggest
competitor dominating the steel industry.
• Acquisition helps in companies improving their sourcing of raw materials;
access to more markets, better utilization, and better efficiency.
Why this takeover was planned?
Competition at a Glance….
• The CEO of Arcelor rejected Mittal Steel’s bid as it was considered an Indian companyand
unworthy of overtaking an European company.
• The French Government was against this deal as it was concerned about the dismissal of
about 28000 Arcelor employees.
• The managers and employees of Arcelor were trying to protect their personal interestsand
control over the company.
Why the resistance for this takeover by
Arcelor?
2
Takeover Tactics employed by Mittal Steel
• At first, Mittal attempted a friendly takeover but got rebuffed.
• Then another attempt was made by offering Arcelor a two-tiered cash andstock
tender.
• But the main strategy used was increased price for the shares forArcelor at an
attractive and appealing premium of 93% with the approval ofEU.
• Initially, Guy Dolle attempted to gain support among local politicians and the press to come
out against the proposed takeover by emphasizing potential job losses and disruption to
local communities.
• Arcelor also provided its shareholders with an attractive alternative to tendering their
shares to Mittal by announcing an $8.75 billion share buy-back at a price well above their
then current share price.
• In an attempt to criticize the offer from Mittal Steel, Arcelor released a 13 Billion Euros
merger plan with Severstal, a Russian company. This merger would have made the new
Severstal-Arcelor entity too big for Mittal Steel to buy.
• On February 16, Arcelor declared a dividend of 1.2 Euros, which was 85% percenthigher
than the previous dividend in 2004.
Takeover Defenses employed by Arcelor
• The revenue increased from $28 billion to $105 billion.
• Net Operating Income increased from $4.7 billion to $14.8 billion.
• Net Profit increased from $3.36 billion to $10.36billion.
• Swap ratio was 1 : 1.0833
• Enlarged market share.
• Increase in the share value by 9.9% to $52.99.
Financial Aspects After TheAcquisition….
ArcelorMittal Today….
• Headquarters: Luxembourg
• World’s leading steel and mining company
• CEO: Laxmi Mittal & CFO: Aditya Mittal
• 2,45,000 Employees
• Market Cap of $26.64 Billion
• In 2012 alone, produced 88.2 million tonnes of steel and shipped 83.8millions.
• Own steel making facilities in 16 countries.
• Mittal Steel took a high degree of risk.
• But succeeded in laying off its biggest competitor.
• Despite many obstacles, Laxmi Mittal achieved his vision of becoming the sole
giant of the steel industry.
Conclusion…
THANK YOU!

Arcelor and mittal deal

  • 1.
  • 2.
    Introduction to theCompanies MITTALSTEEL: Was the largest producer of steel in terms of volume. Based in Netherlands. Founded in 1989 as Ispat International in Sumatra, Indonesia. ARCELOR: Was the second largest producer of steel in terms of turnover and output. Created by the merger of three companies: Aceralia (Spain), Arbed (Luxembourg),Usinor (France)
  • 3.
    A Glimpse ofCompany’s Operations…
  • 4.
  • 5.
    The Initial Attempts…. 1.Thefirst bid made by Mittal was at a premium of 27%. 2.In late May, Mittal increased this bid by 34%. 3.Finally, the last bid was increased by 14% implicating the purchase ofArcelor’s share at a premium of 93%. 4.The agreement was finalized at the total buy out price of $33.8 billion in cash and stock. 5.The new bid was valued at $50.54 per Arcelor share.
  • 6.
    Deal finally clinchedwhen the shareholders of Arcelor agreed to Mittal Steel’s offer – In June 2006 # Mittal raised its valuation of Arcelor to $32.9 billion. # The Mittal family holds 43 percent of the combined group. # The combined company holds 10 percent of the global market for steel.
  • 8.
    • Laxmi Mittalbelieved that the acquisition would terminate its biggest competitor dominating the steel industry. • Acquisition helps in companies improving their sourcing of raw materials; access to more markets, better utilization, and better efficiency. Why this takeover was planned?
  • 9.
    Competition at aGlance….
  • 10.
    • The CEOof Arcelor rejected Mittal Steel’s bid as it was considered an Indian companyand unworthy of overtaking an European company. • The French Government was against this deal as it was concerned about the dismissal of about 28000 Arcelor employees. • The managers and employees of Arcelor were trying to protect their personal interestsand control over the company. Why the resistance for this takeover by Arcelor?
  • 11.
    2 Takeover Tactics employedby Mittal Steel • At first, Mittal attempted a friendly takeover but got rebuffed. • Then another attempt was made by offering Arcelor a two-tiered cash andstock tender. • But the main strategy used was increased price for the shares forArcelor at an attractive and appealing premium of 93% with the approval ofEU.
  • 12.
    • Initially, GuyDolle attempted to gain support among local politicians and the press to come out against the proposed takeover by emphasizing potential job losses and disruption to local communities. • Arcelor also provided its shareholders with an attractive alternative to tendering their shares to Mittal by announcing an $8.75 billion share buy-back at a price well above their then current share price. • In an attempt to criticize the offer from Mittal Steel, Arcelor released a 13 Billion Euros merger plan with Severstal, a Russian company. This merger would have made the new Severstal-Arcelor entity too big for Mittal Steel to buy. • On February 16, Arcelor declared a dividend of 1.2 Euros, which was 85% percenthigher than the previous dividend in 2004. Takeover Defenses employed by Arcelor
  • 13.
    • The revenueincreased from $28 billion to $105 billion. • Net Operating Income increased from $4.7 billion to $14.8 billion. • Net Profit increased from $3.36 billion to $10.36billion. • Swap ratio was 1 : 1.0833 • Enlarged market share. • Increase in the share value by 9.9% to $52.99. Financial Aspects After TheAcquisition….
  • 14.
    ArcelorMittal Today…. • Headquarters:Luxembourg • World’s leading steel and mining company • CEO: Laxmi Mittal & CFO: Aditya Mittal • 2,45,000 Employees • Market Cap of $26.64 Billion • In 2012 alone, produced 88.2 million tonnes of steel and shipped 83.8millions. • Own steel making facilities in 16 countries.
  • 15.
    • Mittal Steeltook a high degree of risk. • But succeeded in laying off its biggest competitor. • Despite many obstacles, Laxmi Mittal achieved his vision of becoming the sole giant of the steel industry. Conclusion…
  • 16.