Academic Library Monograph
Collections and Mobile Technology:
     Trends and Opportunities

              Michael Levine-Clark
              Collections Librarian
              University of Denver
    Academic eBook Future and Developments
             Hong Kong University
               February 22, 2012
Mobile Devices
1990
2010
Academic Library Collections
Collection Development Trends
• Decreasing space
• eBooks
  – DDA
  – POD
• Shrinking budgets
• Emphasis on Discovery
• Disaggregation,
  unbundling
• Greater collaboration
Decreasing Collections Space
• Campus core too valuable
   – Less stack space
• Full storage facilities
• Decreasing storage options
Penrose Library
1972         2012
A Potential Solution
• eBooks/local POD helps with:
  – Space
  – Off-campus access
  – Searchability
  – Multi-user access
  – Satisfying different user needs (p vs e)
Slow Transition to eBooks
• Lack of content
• (Almost) no local POD options
• Interface issues
  – Lack of ereader compatibility
For eBooks to Work, We Need
• Compatibility
  – Device agnostic
• Easy transfer
• Reasonable DRM
Libraries are Doing it Wrong
Adobe Digital Editions
Too Many Steps!
• Library Catalog
• EBL
  – Open
  – Download
• Adobe Digital Editions
• Nook
No Space = No Browsing
• Loss of serendipitous
  discovery
• Major faculty
  concern
The Browsing Problem
•   Books in storage
•   One book – one call number
•   No option for eBooks
•   No option for books not in collection
•   No option for consortial partners
•   No option for books already checked out
The Browsing Solution
• Digital browsing via catalog
  – Any format
  – Physical availability irrelevant
  – One book can have many locations
• A mobile option?
  – QR code for physical location
  – Digital options nearby
Decreasing Budgets
• Disproportionate impact on monographs
  – Fewer dollars = fewer books
Demand-Driven Acquisition
• eBooks combined
  with POD (ideally)
  – eBooks combined with
    print (really)
• Solves multiple
  problems
  – Space
  – Budget
  – Format
Definitions
• Patron-Driven
  Acquisition (PDA)
  – Faculty
    Requests/Input
  – Use Data
• Demand-Driven
  Acquisition (DDA)
  – Meets immediate
    need
Demand-Driven Acquisitions Goals
• Broaden the collection
  – More titles
  – More publishers
  – More subjects
• Match acquisitions to immediate
  demand
  – Pay at point of need
  – Pay for amount of need
  – Short-term loans
  – Purchase-on-demand
University of Denver
           EBL Data (5/1/10-6/30/11)
                             Actual            List

325 titles purchased         $23,753       $23,753

3,599 titles with at least   $49,171      $236,037
one STL
6,477 titles with at least     $0         $473,378
one browse
Total (10,401 titles)        $72,924      $733,168

Savings                             $660,244
Reconceiving Library Collections
• Traditional Model
  – Building a collection
  – Library as steward of cultural record
  – Providing resources for current research/teaching
• DDA
  – Allows a collection based on access
  – Primary goal: providing resources for current
    research/teaching
DDA | Discovery

• Can’t buy it if you can’t find it
• Can’t find it if it’s not where you
  look

• Library discovery tools must work
  where users are
What We Know About Mobile
• Surpassing desktop ownership/usage
• Changing user expectations
  – Immediate access!
     • Download
     • Request
• Changing user behavior
  – Purchase, download
Library Catalogs
• Don’t take advantage of
  mobile:
  – No location information
  – Often no ability to request an
    item for delivery/to be held
  – No ability to check out with
    device
  – Limited by idea of traditional
    catalog/services
Libraries Need To
• Respond to mobile
  technology:
  – Immediate access
  – Anywhere
     • Even for print
Disaggregation, Unbundling
• Of collections
   – Fewer packages
   – End of the big deal?
• Of content
   – Article vs. journal
   – Chapter vs. book


Smaller pieces for
smaller devices
Collaboration
• In purchase
  – e or e/p
• In storage
• In drawing down
  print collections
Shared Collections
• Shared e-access
  – Multiple business
    models for e
    (subscription, purchase,
    package, DDA)
Dispersed Collections
• One print copy to share
  consortially
• Shared storage
• Reliance on partner
  libraries
Remote Collections, Remote Access
Mobile Technology




Library Collections
Thank You

    Michael Levine-Clark
michael.levine-clark@du.edu

Academic Library Monograph Collections and Mobile Technology: Trends and Opportunities

  • 1.
    Academic Library Monograph Collectionsand Mobile Technology: Trends and Opportunities Michael Levine-Clark Collections Librarian University of Denver Academic eBook Future and Developments Hong Kong University February 22, 2012
  • 2.
  • 3.
  • 4.
  • 9.
  • 10.
    Collection Development Trends •Decreasing space • eBooks – DDA – POD • Shrinking budgets • Emphasis on Discovery • Disaggregation, unbundling • Greater collaboration
  • 11.
    Decreasing Collections Space •Campus core too valuable – Less stack space • Full storage facilities • Decreasing storage options
  • 12.
  • 13.
    A Potential Solution •eBooks/local POD helps with: – Space – Off-campus access – Searchability – Multi-user access – Satisfying different user needs (p vs e)
  • 14.
    Slow Transition toeBooks • Lack of content • (Almost) no local POD options • Interface issues – Lack of ereader compatibility
  • 15.
    For eBooks toWork, We Need • Compatibility – Device agnostic • Easy transfer • Reasonable DRM
  • 16.
  • 18.
  • 21.
    Too Many Steps! •Library Catalog • EBL – Open – Download • Adobe Digital Editions • Nook
  • 22.
    No Space =No Browsing • Loss of serendipitous discovery • Major faculty concern
  • 23.
    The Browsing Problem • Books in storage • One book – one call number • No option for eBooks • No option for books not in collection • No option for consortial partners • No option for books already checked out
  • 24.
    The Browsing Solution •Digital browsing via catalog – Any format – Physical availability irrelevant – One book can have many locations • A mobile option? – QR code for physical location – Digital options nearby
  • 25.
    Decreasing Budgets • Disproportionateimpact on monographs – Fewer dollars = fewer books
  • 26.
    Demand-Driven Acquisition • eBookscombined with POD (ideally) – eBooks combined with print (really) • Solves multiple problems – Space – Budget – Format
  • 27.
    Definitions • Patron-Driven Acquisition (PDA) – Faculty Requests/Input – Use Data • Demand-Driven Acquisition (DDA) – Meets immediate need
  • 28.
    Demand-Driven Acquisitions Goals •Broaden the collection – More titles – More publishers – More subjects • Match acquisitions to immediate demand – Pay at point of need – Pay for amount of need – Short-term loans – Purchase-on-demand
  • 29.
    University of Denver EBL Data (5/1/10-6/30/11) Actual List 325 titles purchased $23,753 $23,753 3,599 titles with at least $49,171 $236,037 one STL 6,477 titles with at least $0 $473,378 one browse Total (10,401 titles) $72,924 $733,168 Savings $660,244
  • 30.
    Reconceiving Library Collections •Traditional Model – Building a collection – Library as steward of cultural record – Providing resources for current research/teaching • DDA – Allows a collection based on access – Primary goal: providing resources for current research/teaching
  • 31.
    DDA | Discovery •Can’t buy it if you can’t find it • Can’t find it if it’s not where you look • Library discovery tools must work where users are
  • 32.
    What We KnowAbout Mobile • Surpassing desktop ownership/usage • Changing user expectations – Immediate access! • Download • Request • Changing user behavior – Purchase, download
  • 33.
    Library Catalogs • Don’ttake advantage of mobile: – No location information – Often no ability to request an item for delivery/to be held – No ability to check out with device – Limited by idea of traditional catalog/services
  • 34.
    Libraries Need To •Respond to mobile technology: – Immediate access – Anywhere • Even for print
  • 35.
    Disaggregation, Unbundling • Ofcollections – Fewer packages – End of the big deal? • Of content – Article vs. journal – Chapter vs. book Smaller pieces for smaller devices
  • 37.
    Collaboration • In purchase – e or e/p • In storage • In drawing down print collections
  • 38.
    Shared Collections • Sharede-access – Multiple business models for e (subscription, purchase, package, DDA)
  • 39.
    Dispersed Collections • Oneprint copy to share consortially • Shared storage • Reliance on partner libraries
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
    Thank You Michael Levine-Clark michael.levine-clark@du.edu

Editor's Notes

  • #7 Morgan Stanley Internet Trends, April 12, 2010. http://www.morganstanley.com/institutional/techresearch/pdfs/Internet_Trends_041210.pdf
  • #8 Morgan Stanley Internet Trends, April 12, 2010. http://www.morganstanley.com/institutional/techresearch/pdfs/Internet_Trends_041210.pdf
  • #9 Morgan Stanley Internet Trends, April 12, 2010. http://www.morganstanley.com/institutional/techresearch/pdfs/Internet_Trends_041210.pdf
  • #30 325 titles purchased – not included in Total (10,076) since they are also part of the list of titles with at least one STL. 3,599 titles with at least one STL. Total Number of STLs is 5,337 across those 3,599 titlesCalculations of list price are based on the average cost of the 325 books actually purchased ($73.09)
  • #34 NCSU