The study examines the impact of small ruminant diseases on Ethiopian households, focusing on gender differences and the role of women in livestock production. It identifies key disease constraints and assesses perceived impacts among household members through focus group discussions and surveys. The findings highlight that women are significantly affected by disease-related issues, emphasizing the need for gender-sensitive approaches in livestock health interventions.

1. Impact of small ruminant diseases on
different household members in Ethiopia
Barbara Wieland, Biruk Alemu, Hiwot Desta, Wole Kinati, Shiferaw
Tafesse, Anouka Van Eerdewijk, Annet A. Mulema
First joint conference of the Association of Institutions for Tropical Veterinary Medicine
and the Society of Tropical Veterinary Medicine, Berlin, Germany, 4–8 September 2016

2. Background
• Small ruminants serve multiple livelihood roles for Ethiopian
small holders
• Women play important role in small rumiant production
• Little is known on how disease impact and risk mitigation
strategies differ among household members
 understanding of these issues is pivotal to design
sustainable livestock health interventions

3. Objectives
This study aimed at
- identifying disease constraints
- assess impacts of disease constraints as
perceived by men and women in mixed crop-
livestock and agro-pastoralist systems

4. Materials and methods
1. Focus groups discussions
(FGDs)
 In 23 villages in 4 regions,
Oromia, Tigray, Amhara and
SNNPR, in Ethiopia
 In each village separate FGDs
were held with women, men,
young women and young
men
 Participatory tools: simple
ranking, proportional piling
and seasonal calendar

5. Materials and methods
2. Household survey
 440 household in the
same areas
 50% of interviews
conducted with women,
50% with men
 Questions based on FGD
findings

6. Quantify/rank impacts
In FGDs:
For identified important diseases, farmers were asked
• how the disease impacts the household
• which household members most affected
• proportional piling for M, W, YM, YF, CH
In HH survey:
• 3 main impacts for the 3 most important diseases
• recorded according to impact categories from FGDs

7. Results
Disease Priority: agro-ecology
Highland Woredas Lowland Woredas
Disease Category Mean rank
score
Test statistics Mean rank
score
Test statistics
Respiratory dis 6.10 N=68
Kendall's W= 0.38
Chi-Square= 153.952
Df=6
Asymp. Sig.= 0.000
4.40 N=24
Kendall's W= 0.09
Chi-Square=12.382
Df=6
Asymp. Sig.= 0.054
Neurological dis 4.40 3.23
Skin dis 3.93 4.15
GIT 5.01 4.44
External par 2.71 3.69
Systemic 2.72 4.81
Other 3.13 3.29
• In highland areas (mixed crop-livestock system): priorities were
respiratory diseases and GIT parasites with strong agreement among
respondent groups
• In lowland areas (pastoral and agro-pastoral system): priorities were
systemic diseases and neurological diseases, differences between
regions

8. Results
Disease priority: gender
• Women and young female scored respiratory diseases higher than young male
and men
• Young men and women scored neurological diseases higher than men and young
female

9. Results
Impact categories identified in FGDs
Economical
• Financial: loss of income
• Mortality
• Productivity: poor growth rates & weight gain, lack of milk for offspring
• Value: meat quality, hide quality
• Costs: for treatment
• Waste of time
Social
• Social/psychological: status, taxes unpaid, no mixing with other animals
• Drop out of school: school fees unpaid
• Migration for other jobs in cities
Human
• Food security/malnutrition
• Human health

11. Who is affected from the HH? Why?
Women are most severely affected
• women bear the main
responsibility of looking after
diseased animals
• In order to fulfill their household
duties (children, food), they rely on
income from small ruminants
• Lack of other income sources if
animals are lost due to disease
• For men it is easier find other work
if for some reason animals are lost

12. Impact by disease categories
0.0% 5.0% 10.0% 15.0% 20.0% 25.0% 30.0%
Loss of income
Mortality
Productivity
Value
Cost
Timewasting
Migration
DropoutSchool
Social
Psychological
FoodSecurity
HumanHealth
Resp Neuro Skin GIT Ectopar Systemic other
% of answers received

13. Impact perception: by gender
0.0% 2.0% 4.0% 6.0% 8.0% 10.0% 12.0% 14.0%
Loss of income
Mortality
Productivity
Value
Cost
Timewasting
Migration
DropoutSchool
Social
Psychological
FoodSecurity
HumanHealth
women men
% of answers received

14. Impact: Agro-ecology
0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35%
Loss of income
Mortality
Productivity
Value
Cost
Timewasting
Migration
DropoutSchool
Psychological
Social
FoodSecurity
HumanHealth
High/midlands Lowland
% of answers received

15. Conclusions
• Impact of SR diseases highly important in
women
• Understanding of impacts almost similar in men
and women
• Need to take gender into account when
designing small ruminant health interventions

16. Acknowledgements
This work is financed by
• SmaRT project (IFAD), Africa RISING project (USAID)
It is implemented in a partnership with
• ICARDA, Regional Research Centers (DBARC, SDARC,
YPDARC, BongaARC, AbergelleARC, BakoARC, ArekaARC),
Mada Walabu University and Agricultural Offices in the
project sites
It contributes to the CGIAR Research Program on
• Livestock and Fish

17. The presentation has a Creative Commons license. You are free to re-use or distribute this work, provided credit is given to ILRI.
better lives through livestock
ilri.org