BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL
FOR WASTE WATER TREATMENT
ANJALI T.B
SES, CUSAT
INTRODUCTION
Presence of nutrients like nitrogen & phosphorus in waste water effluents
and their impacts on natural water bodies are of major concern.
With the recent evidence that the anthropogenic phosphorus addition in
microorganisms in milligram per litre level can trigger algal growth.
Chemical & biological means are adopted to remove them.
Biological phosphorus removal process is popular over chemical means, for
it’s simplicity, economy & various environmental benefits.
This process relies on enhancing ability of organisms to uptake more
phosphorus into their cell.
These processes are often referred to as “ Enhanced Biological
Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) process.
It is considered to be a cost effective and environmentally
sustainable alternative to chemical treatment.
It also have limited space and multi-functioning systems.
There is a growing understanding of the biochemical mechanisms
associated with luxury phosphorus uptake, Which early upon
Phosphorus Accumulating Organisms( PAO) for EBPR.
There are some operating conditions like;
Prerequisites for metabolism such as C, Glucose & electron acceptor
are being adjusted to promote the growth and proliferation of PAOs.
Identification of PAO
Biological P-removal primarily occurs via the accumulation of P
by microbes (Luxury uptake).
P- accumulation is as Polyphosphate as an energy reserve for
maintenance or to provide a competitive advantage over ordinary
heterotrophs.
Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis (Accumulibacter) is the
widely used PAO.
Acinetobacter species, were reported to be the organisms
primarily responsible for EBPR.
Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis
Scientific classification
Kingdom: Bacteria
Phylum: Proteobacteria
Class: Betaproteobacteria
Order: Unclassified
Family:
Candidatus
Accumulibacter
Candidatus Accumulibacter
phosphatis (blue cells)
Acinetobacter
Scientific classification
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Proteobacteria
Class: Gammaproteobacteria
Order: Pseudomonadales
Family: Moraxellaceae
Genus: Acinetobacter
Acinetobacter baumannii
Other putative PAOs found in varying low levels at P- removal
wastewater treatment plants are;
Pseudomonas sp.
Pseudomonas
P. aeruginosa colonies on an agar plate
Scientific classification
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Proteobacteria
Class: Gammaproteobacteria
Order: Pseudomonadales
Family: Pseudomonadaceae
Genus: Pseudomonas
 Paracoccus sp.
Paracoccus denitrificans
Scientific classification
Domain: Bacteria
Phylum: Proteobacteria
Class: Alphaproteobacteria
Order: Rhodobacterales
Family: Rhodobacteraceae
Genus: Paracoccus
Species: P. denitrificans
Binomial name
Paracoccus denitrificans
Enerococcus sp.
Class: Bacilli
Scientific name: Enterococcus
Order: Lactobacillales
Division: Firmicutes
Higher classification: Enterococcaceae
Lower classifications: Enterococcus faecalis
BIOLOGICAL P-REMOVAL
Soluble & Particulate phosphorus.
The treatment process can be designed to promote the
growth of PAOs.
PAOs convert available organic matter to PHAs.
PHAs: Polyhydroxy alkanoates are linear polyesters
produced in nature by bacterial fermentation of sugar or
lipids.
TREATMENT PROCESSES
Integrated fixed film activated sludge process.
Sequential batch reactor process.
Step feed process.
Moving bed biofilm reactor process.
Membrane biological reactor process.
Oxidation Ditch process.
INTEGRATED FIXED FILM ACTIVATED SLUDGE
PROCESS (IFAS)
The IFAS process is a combination of the fixed-film and the
suspended activated sludge processes.
 In general, the addition of media to the aeration basins makes
it possible for nitrifying sludge ages to be attained in
considerably smaller basin volume than required for a comparable
single-stage activated sludge nitrification process.
The added media provides surface area for the growth of
microbes, and, in combination with the MLSS, the desired
nitrification.
 The result is an equivalent MLSS concentration upwards of
6,000 mg/L.
 The attached growth, however, does not impose excessive solids
loadings on the final clarifiers, since the growth remains in the
aeration basin.
SEQUENTIAL BATCH REACTOR
(SBR) PROCESS
STEP FEED PROCESS
Continuous flow process.
Influent flow is split to several feed locations.
Recycle sludge stream is sent to the beginning.
Higher solid retention time is achieved providing enhanced treatment.
Phosphorus removal is limited.
MOVING BED BIOFILM REACTOR PROCESS
(MBBR)
Direct derivative of fixed film
activated sludge process.
HDPE carrier elements are used.
Provides sites for bacteria
attachment.
Allows higher concentration of
active biomass.
More treatment capacity.
Phosphorus removal requires
additional stages.
CARRIERS USED IN MBBR
MEMBRANE BIOLOGICAL REACTOR PROCESS
(MBR)
Consists of separate aeration tanks
and membrane filtration tanks.
The membrane elements separate
solids from the treated effluent.
Excess solids are wasted directly
from the aeration tanks.
Membranes vary from hollow tube
filters to flat panels.
Require several cleaning cycles.
OXIDATION DITCH PROCESS
MECHANISM IN P- REMOVAL
The phosphorus in the waste water is merged into cell biomass,
which is later removed as an end product of sludge wasting.
The reactor configuration consist of an anaerobic tank and an
activated sludge tank.
Retention time in the anaerobic tank is about 0.50 to 1.00 hrs.
UNDER ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS
PAO blend in fermentation products into storage products within
the cells with the associated release of phosphorus from stored
phosphates.
Acetate is produced by fermentation.
Which is dissolved degradable organic material that can be easily
integrated by the biomass.
Energy available from stored polyphosphate, the PAO adapt
acetate & produce intracellular poly hydroxy butyrate(PHB) storage
products.
The PHB content in the PAO increases as the polyphosphate
decreases.
IN THE AEROBIC ZONE
Energy is produced by the oxidation of storage products &
polyphosphate storage within the cell increases.
Stored PHB is processed , providing energy from oxidation & C
for new cell growth.
The energy released from PHB oxidation is used to form
polyphosphate bonds in the cell storage.
The soluble orthophosphate is removed from the solution &
combined into polyphosphate within the bacterial cell.
PHB utilization also enhances cell growth and this new
biomass with high polyphosphate storage accounts for P
removal.
As a portion of the biomass is wasted the stored phosphorus
is removed from the bio-treatment reactor for ultimate
disposal with the waste sludge.
TRADITIONAL EBPR SYSTEMS & RECENT ENHANCEMENTS
EBPR has traditionally been applied with in conventional activated
sludge (CAS) systems.
The level of biological P-removal is directly proportional to the number
of PAO present in the system.
Recent applications of EBPR include incorporation in membrane
bioreactors (MBR), Granular Sludge Reactors & Sequencing Batch
Biofilm Reactor (SBRs).
Inclusion of EBPR in MBRS, whether SBRs or continuous- flow,
has proven successful in achieving high levels of P- removal from
MWW.
Novel technologies offer potential for high levels of P-removal with
some even achieving efficient P-removal over sustained periods of
time at various scales.
ALGAE-BASED & HYBRID TREATMENT OPTIONS
The use of microalgae systems for the treatment of wastewater is
now well established.
But it’s full-scale applications for nutrient removal is more limited.
MECHANISMS OF ALGAL P-REMOVAL
P is an essential nutrient for algal growth.
Under some circumstances, P is taken up as polyphosphate granules for
use as a growth reserve for when there is a lack of P in the environment.
Where, inorganic orthophosphate is unavailable, algae will uptake
organic P, converting to orthophosphate at the cell surface via the
enzyme phosphatase.
Algal treatment solutions are typically either closed or open suspended
systems, or biofilm systems, most commonly using flat-bed or tubular
orientation.
APPLICATION OF ALGAL P- SYSTEMS
The green microalga Scenedesmus sp. and Chlorella sp. are known to
carry out consequential luxury P uptake in the natural environment.
high levels (up to 90%) of P-removal has been achieved by the
immobilization of these microalgae on synthetic substrate, either sheets
or as beads.
Micro-algal biofilm photo-bioreactors have also shown effective removal
(97% Total P-removal).
An osmotic membrane photo-bioreactor is a further enhancement of
the membrane photo-bioreactor, developed with the specific intention of
reducing membrane fouling.
THANK YOU

Biological phosphorus removal for waste water treatment

  • 1.
    BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL FORWASTE WATER TREATMENT ANJALI T.B SES, CUSAT
  • 2.
    INTRODUCTION Presence of nutrientslike nitrogen & phosphorus in waste water effluents and their impacts on natural water bodies are of major concern. With the recent evidence that the anthropogenic phosphorus addition in microorganisms in milligram per litre level can trigger algal growth. Chemical & biological means are adopted to remove them. Biological phosphorus removal process is popular over chemical means, for it’s simplicity, economy & various environmental benefits. This process relies on enhancing ability of organisms to uptake more phosphorus into their cell.
  • 3.
    These processes areoften referred to as “ Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal (EBPR) process. It is considered to be a cost effective and environmentally sustainable alternative to chemical treatment. It also have limited space and multi-functioning systems. There is a growing understanding of the biochemical mechanisms associated with luxury phosphorus uptake, Which early upon Phosphorus Accumulating Organisms( PAO) for EBPR. There are some operating conditions like; Prerequisites for metabolism such as C, Glucose & electron acceptor are being adjusted to promote the growth and proliferation of PAOs.
  • 4.
    Identification of PAO BiologicalP-removal primarily occurs via the accumulation of P by microbes (Luxury uptake). P- accumulation is as Polyphosphate as an energy reserve for maintenance or to provide a competitive advantage over ordinary heterotrophs. Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis (Accumulibacter) is the widely used PAO. Acinetobacter species, were reported to be the organisms primarily responsible for EBPR.
  • 5.
    Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis Scientificclassification Kingdom: Bacteria Phylum: Proteobacteria Class: Betaproteobacteria Order: Unclassified Family: Candidatus Accumulibacter Candidatus Accumulibacter phosphatis (blue cells)
  • 6.
    Acinetobacter Scientific classification Domain: Bacteria Phylum:Proteobacteria Class: Gammaproteobacteria Order: Pseudomonadales Family: Moraxellaceae Genus: Acinetobacter Acinetobacter baumannii
  • 7.
    Other putative PAOsfound in varying low levels at P- removal wastewater treatment plants are; Pseudomonas sp. Pseudomonas P. aeruginosa colonies on an agar plate Scientific classification Domain: Bacteria Phylum: Proteobacteria Class: Gammaproteobacteria Order: Pseudomonadales Family: Pseudomonadaceae Genus: Pseudomonas
  • 8.
     Paracoccus sp. Paracoccusdenitrificans Scientific classification Domain: Bacteria Phylum: Proteobacteria Class: Alphaproteobacteria Order: Rhodobacterales Family: Rhodobacteraceae Genus: Paracoccus Species: P. denitrificans Binomial name Paracoccus denitrificans
  • 9.
    Enerococcus sp. Class: Bacilli Scientificname: Enterococcus Order: Lactobacillales Division: Firmicutes Higher classification: Enterococcaceae Lower classifications: Enterococcus faecalis
  • 10.
    BIOLOGICAL P-REMOVAL Soluble &Particulate phosphorus. The treatment process can be designed to promote the growth of PAOs. PAOs convert available organic matter to PHAs. PHAs: Polyhydroxy alkanoates are linear polyesters produced in nature by bacterial fermentation of sugar or lipids.
  • 11.
    TREATMENT PROCESSES Integrated fixedfilm activated sludge process. Sequential batch reactor process. Step feed process. Moving bed biofilm reactor process. Membrane biological reactor process. Oxidation Ditch process.
  • 12.
    INTEGRATED FIXED FILMACTIVATED SLUDGE PROCESS (IFAS)
  • 13.
    The IFAS processis a combination of the fixed-film and the suspended activated sludge processes.  In general, the addition of media to the aeration basins makes it possible for nitrifying sludge ages to be attained in considerably smaller basin volume than required for a comparable single-stage activated sludge nitrification process. The added media provides surface area for the growth of microbes, and, in combination with the MLSS, the desired nitrification.  The result is an equivalent MLSS concentration upwards of 6,000 mg/L.  The attached growth, however, does not impose excessive solids loadings on the final clarifiers, since the growth remains in the aeration basin.
  • 15.
  • 16.
    STEP FEED PROCESS Continuousflow process. Influent flow is split to several feed locations. Recycle sludge stream is sent to the beginning. Higher solid retention time is achieved providing enhanced treatment. Phosphorus removal is limited.
  • 17.
    MOVING BED BIOFILMREACTOR PROCESS (MBBR) Direct derivative of fixed film activated sludge process. HDPE carrier elements are used. Provides sites for bacteria attachment. Allows higher concentration of active biomass. More treatment capacity. Phosphorus removal requires additional stages.
  • 18.
  • 19.
    MEMBRANE BIOLOGICAL REACTORPROCESS (MBR) Consists of separate aeration tanks and membrane filtration tanks. The membrane elements separate solids from the treated effluent. Excess solids are wasted directly from the aeration tanks. Membranes vary from hollow tube filters to flat panels. Require several cleaning cycles.
  • 20.
  • 22.
    MECHANISM IN P-REMOVAL The phosphorus in the waste water is merged into cell biomass, which is later removed as an end product of sludge wasting. The reactor configuration consist of an anaerobic tank and an activated sludge tank. Retention time in the anaerobic tank is about 0.50 to 1.00 hrs.
  • 23.
    UNDER ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS PAOblend in fermentation products into storage products within the cells with the associated release of phosphorus from stored phosphates. Acetate is produced by fermentation. Which is dissolved degradable organic material that can be easily integrated by the biomass. Energy available from stored polyphosphate, the PAO adapt acetate & produce intracellular poly hydroxy butyrate(PHB) storage products. The PHB content in the PAO increases as the polyphosphate decreases.
  • 25.
    IN THE AEROBICZONE Energy is produced by the oxidation of storage products & polyphosphate storage within the cell increases. Stored PHB is processed , providing energy from oxidation & C for new cell growth. The energy released from PHB oxidation is used to form polyphosphate bonds in the cell storage.
  • 26.
    The soluble orthophosphateis removed from the solution & combined into polyphosphate within the bacterial cell. PHB utilization also enhances cell growth and this new biomass with high polyphosphate storage accounts for P removal. As a portion of the biomass is wasted the stored phosphorus is removed from the bio-treatment reactor for ultimate disposal with the waste sludge.
  • 28.
    TRADITIONAL EBPR SYSTEMS& RECENT ENHANCEMENTS EBPR has traditionally been applied with in conventional activated sludge (CAS) systems. The level of biological P-removal is directly proportional to the number of PAO present in the system. Recent applications of EBPR include incorporation in membrane bioreactors (MBR), Granular Sludge Reactors & Sequencing Batch Biofilm Reactor (SBRs).
  • 29.
    Inclusion of EBPRin MBRS, whether SBRs or continuous- flow, has proven successful in achieving high levels of P- removal from MWW. Novel technologies offer potential for high levels of P-removal with some even achieving efficient P-removal over sustained periods of time at various scales. ALGAE-BASED & HYBRID TREATMENT OPTIONS The use of microalgae systems for the treatment of wastewater is now well established. But it’s full-scale applications for nutrient removal is more limited.
  • 30.
    MECHANISMS OF ALGALP-REMOVAL P is an essential nutrient for algal growth. Under some circumstances, P is taken up as polyphosphate granules for use as a growth reserve for when there is a lack of P in the environment. Where, inorganic orthophosphate is unavailable, algae will uptake organic P, converting to orthophosphate at the cell surface via the enzyme phosphatase. Algal treatment solutions are typically either closed or open suspended systems, or biofilm systems, most commonly using flat-bed or tubular orientation.
  • 32.
    APPLICATION OF ALGALP- SYSTEMS The green microalga Scenedesmus sp. and Chlorella sp. are known to carry out consequential luxury P uptake in the natural environment. high levels (up to 90%) of P-removal has been achieved by the immobilization of these microalgae on synthetic substrate, either sheets or as beads. Micro-algal biofilm photo-bioreactors have also shown effective removal (97% Total P-removal). An osmotic membrane photo-bioreactor is a further enhancement of the membrane photo-bioreactor, developed with the specific intention of reducing membrane fouling.
  • 34.