This document provides a summary of a geotechnical investigation report for a proposed solar power plant park in Bhadla, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. The investigation included 25 soil borings up to 6 meters deep, standard penetration and geophysical tests, and laboratory testing of soil samples. The site geology generally consisted of fine sand and silty fine sand in the top 3 meters underlain by cemented fine sand down to 6 meters. Groundwater was not encountered. The report assessed geologic hazards and found little potential for landslides, flooding, erosion, subsidence or faulting. Poor soil conditions like collapsible soils may exist but are not a significant hazard.

1. DISCLAIMER
The data(s) & information(s) have been provided for the purpose of information only. The data(s)/
information(s) provided are tentative in nature. However bidders in their own interest are advised
to ensure correctness /accuracy / reliability/ completeness of these data(s)/ information(s), before
participating in the Bid. The data(s)/ & information(s) provided in good faith, neither the
RREC(Procurer) or their employees or advisors make any representations or warranty, express or
implied , or accept any responsibility or liability , whatsoever , in respect of any statements or
omissions herein , or the accuracy ,completeness or reliability of information, and shall incur no
liability under any law, stratute, rules or regulations as the accuracy, reliability or completeness of
the data(s) / information(s) provided, even if any loss or damage is caused by any act or omission
on their part.

2. RAJASTHAN RENEWABLE ENERGY
CORPORATION LIMITED
TECHNICAL REPORT
FOR
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
FOR
PROPOSED STRUCTURE OF PHOTOVOLTAIC SOLAR
POWER PLANT AT SOLAR PARK OF RREC AT VILLAGE
BHADLA, DI. JODHPUR
BY:
DR.K.C.THAKER
B.E.(CIVIL) ; M.TECH (S.M.); (I.I.T, BOMBAY)
Ph.D.(I.I.T., BOMBAY);F.I.E.(INDIA); F.I.G.S.
K.K.THAKER
B.E. (CIVIL) GOLD MEDALIST;
M.E (GEOTECH)
M.B.A.(FINANCE);M.I.E(INDIA); M.I.G.S; M.G.I.C.E.A.
K.C.T. Consultancy Services
OFFICE :
Plot no.1,Sayona Silver Estate-Part II,
Behind Silver Oak Club,
Beside Auda Water Tank
Opp. Sarjan RMC Plant,
Gota, Ahmedabad 382 481
Phone :- 65103088/89/90,9825064378,
FEBRUARY-2011
ST/02/11/776

3. 1.0 Project Description
This preliminary report summarizes the geotechnical investigation performed by KCT
Consultancy Services for the proposed solar power plant park, of RREC is considering
building near village Bhadla, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. The project consists of a proposed solar
plant, including photovoltaic (PV) panels, transformers and control room. The following table
of loads and settlement criteria for project features was considered for this investigation.
Maximum settlement (mm)Structure / Foundation
Type
Approx. Load
(Max T / m2
)
Appox. Footing
Size (m) Total Differential
Transformer Pad 5 2.5m X 2.5m 40 25
Control Room 10 2.0m X 2.0m 40 25
PV Panel Support Pier Vertical Load of 0.25 T 0.45 m diameter 25 NA
PV Panel Support Pier Lateral Load of 1 T 0.45m diameter 25 NA
PV Panel Support Pier Moment of 0.5 t-m 0.45m diameter 25 NA
2.0 Field Exploration and Laboratory Testing
Total of 25 nos. of 6m test borings were carried out using rotary drilling method at the site.
The locations of the borings were selected spread over the entire area. The borings were
advanced following IS 1892. Boring logs are appended in fig 2 to 26.
2.1 Sampling
2.1.1 Disturbed Samples
Disturbed samples were collected during boring and from the split spoon sampler. The
samples recovered were logged, labeled and placed in polyethylene bags and sent to
laboratory for testing.
2.1.2 Undisturbed Samples
Undisturbed soil samples were collected in 90 mm diameter thin walled Shelby tubes.
Undisturbed samples were collected at an interval of around 3.0 m. Samples were collected
from each strata. The samples collected were sealed properly using wax, labeled and
transported to the laboratory. Undisturbed rock samples were collected in form of rock cores.
Undisturbed samples were collected continuously during drilling. The samples were
numbered and marked with the drill depth and drilling direction. Samples were packed in
core boxes and transported to the laboratory within 7 days of their collection at site.
2.1.3 Standard Penetration Test
The standard penetration tests were conduct in accordance with IS:2131-1981 in test bore at
regular intervals. The test gives N – Value, the blow counts of last 30 cm penetration of split
spoon sampler with 63.5 kg hammer falling from 76 cm height.
ST/02/11/776
Page no.1 of 73

4. 2.1.4 Geophysical Survey
In all geophysical surveys, Electrical Resistivity method is best and reliable to know
geological formation of the the area. All geological formations possess properties called
electrical resistivity when the current flows through them. Resistivity thus is defined as the
resistance offered by a unit cube of material to direct current flowing through it in a direction
perpendicular to two of its opposite faces. The numerical value of the resistivity is expressed
in ohm. m in general. Thus the electrical resistivity is principally based on the study of
resistance offered by the sub-surface formation to the flow of current. The study in turns
helps in evaluation of the characteristic of the sub surface layers in terms of electrical
resistivity. Vertical electrical soundings (VES) have been conducted by using resistivity
meter of I G I S make direct current in deployed during survey. Two metal stakes called
current electrodes into the sub surface transmit the current and the potential response is
observed by means two copper electrodes called potential electrodes.
Apparent resistivity is calculated from the equation:-
ρ = 2πSR
K = 2πS = Geometric factor for electrode spacing (winner method)
R = Resistance in Ohms
S = Spacing between adjacent electrodes in (m)
ρ = Resistivity in ohm.m.
2.2 Laboratory Testing
The following table lists the laboratory tests conducted on undisturbed and disturbed soil
samples collected from various depths to find physical properties and strength
characteristics.
Tests Recomnd procedure Type Samples
1. Sample Preparation IS 2720 Pt I DS / UDS
2. Moisture Content IS 2720 Pt II DS / UDS
3. Dry Unit Weight LAMBE UDS
4. Specific Gravity IS 2720 Pt III DS
5. Liquid Limit IS 2720 DS
6. Plastic Limit IS 2720 Pt V DS
7. Grain Size Analysis IS 2720 Pt IV DS
8. Soil Classification IS 1498 DS / UDS
9. Consolidation IS 2720 Pt XV UDS
10. U. comp. strength IS 2720 Pt X UDS
11. Triaxial Comp. Test IS 2720 Pt X UDS
ST/02/11/776
Page no.2 of 73

5. 3.0 Site Surface and Geologic Conditions
3.1 Regional Geologic Conditions
A large tract of western and northwestern Rajasthan and Sindh, 640 km long and 160 km
wide, constitutes the “Thar Desert” (Krishnan, 1986). The origin of the Thar Desert is
attributed to a long, continued and extreme degree of aridity of the region, combined with the
sand drifting action of the south-west monsoon winds which sweep through Rajasthan for
several months of the year without precipitating any part of their contained moisture. In
general, the sands are poorly graded with an insignificant proportion of coarse and medium
sized sand grains.
3.2 Local Geologic Setting
The project site is located at elevations ranging between approximately 168 to 185 m above
mean sea level. The area is a nearly flat, shallow, south - east to north - west sloping
surface. As shown in the borings logs, soil encountered during our subsurface investigation
generally consisted of four generalized strata as given below:
Stratum-I : Fine sand & silty fine sand , upto 0 to 3 m
Stratum II : Cemented fine sand, between 3 to 6 m
3.3 Groundwater Conditions
Groundwater was not encountered up to 6 m depth during our subsurface investigation.
3.4 Geologic Hazards
3.4.1 General
Geologic and seismic hazards are those hazards that may impact a site due to the
surrounding geologic and seismic conditions. Geologic hazards include landslides, flooding
and erosion, subsidence, and poor soil conditions. Seismic hazards include phenomena that
occur during or soon after an earthquake, such as primary ground rupture, strong ground
shaking, liquefaction and seismically induced settlement.
The potential for these hazards to impact the site have been assessed based on
investigation and published data and it can be concluded that there is little to no potential for
landslides, subsidence, fault surface rupture, liquefaction, and seismic settlement. There is
no potential for flooding and erosion. Further, poor soil conditions may exist in form of
collapsible soil pockets and strong ground shaking is not denied. All identified geologic and
seismic hazards are considered less than significant. To the extent of the information
available for this investigation, geologic and seismic hazards do not appear to represent a
“fatal flaw” for the proposed development.
3.4.2 Landslides
The proposed project lies in the relatively flat-lying Plain, where landslides would not be
expected to occur. Therefore, landslides are not anticipated to pose a hazard to the
proposed project.
ST/02/11/776
Page no.3 of 73

6. 3.4.3 Flooding and Erosion
Flooding and the consequent erosion associated with flooding are those hazards that are the
result of concentrated flow of storm water during rains. Based on both our review of
published maps and on observations during our site work, site topography is relatively flat,
void of significant drainages or collection areas, and inclined gently toward the northeast at
average gradients. The expected rainfall in the area is very low, therefore, the potential for
flooding and erosion within the southern portion of the site is considered to be very
low.
3.4.4 Subsidence
The extraction of water or petroleum from sedimentary source rocks can cause the
permanent collapse of the pore space previously occupied by the removed fluid. The
compaction of subsurface sediments by fluid withdrawal will cause subsidence of the ground
surface overlying a pumped reservoir. If the volume of water or petroleum removed is
sufficiently great, the amount of resulting subsidence may be sufficient to damage nearby
engineered structures.
Significant quantities of water or petroleum are not being extracted beneath the area
occupied by the site. Subsidence is therefore not anticipated to pose a significant hazard
to the project site, barring such extraction in the future.
3.4.5 Poor Soil Conditions (Expansive, Collapsible, or Corrosive Soils)
Expansive soils are fine-grained soils (generally high plasticity clays) that can undergo a
significant increase in volume with an increase in water content and a significant decrease in
volume with a decrease in water content. Changes in the water content of a highly expansive
soil can result in severe distress to structures constructed on or against the soil.
As indicated on the boring logs such expansive soils were not encountered in the near
surface during our subsurface investigation.
Collapsible soils are those that undergo settlement upon wetting, even without the
application of additional load. The process of collapse with the addition of water is known as
hydro-compaction. Hydro-compaction occurs when water weakens or destroys the bonds
between soil particles and severely reduces the bearing capacity of the soil. Typical
collapsible soils are lightly colored, are low in plasticity and have relatively low densities.
Collapsible soils are typically associated with alluvial fans, windblown materials, or
colluvium. There is some potential for collapsible soils. The potential for collapsible
soils would need to be addressed during the design phase of the project and if
collapsible soils are found to occur at the site, mitigation measures may be necessary
to reduce or eliminate the hazard.
Alam Singh et al. (1985) classify dune sand as a meta-stable or collapsible soil that goes
through radical re-arrangement of particles and loss in volume upon wetting with or without
load application. The SPT values and relative density of the soil are a function of the
ST/02/11/776
Page no.4 of 73

7. overburden. Thus, higher the overburden pressure, the lower is the relative density for the
same SPT value. Table 1 presents SPT values for stable and unstable dunes.
Table - SPT N-Values for Stable and Unstable Dunes (Source : Alam Singh et al, 1985)
N – ValueDepth (m) Condition
Stable Dune Unstable Dune
1.0 Dry 8 – 12 5 – 7
2.0 Dry 10 – 17 7 – 13
3.0 Dry 12 – 25 9 – 15
4.0 Dry 16 – 35 14 – 15
1.0 Submerged - 1 – 2
2.0 Submerged - 3 – 4
Dune sands have low bearing capacities. The traditional and standard methods of
computation of soil bearing capacity and settlement tend to over-predict the soil bearing
capacity. This is because dune sands have a collapsible soil structure and are highly
compressible. Settlement of these soils is higher than that for other soils with similar
engineering characteristics. The behavior of dune sands is not governed by the normal laws
of soil-water relationship. SPT values decrease on addition of water. Settlement also occurs
on contact with water even without application of load. It has been observed that in loose
desert sands of Rajasthan, the total settlement due to rise in water table is much larger than
twice the initial settlement.
Corrosive soils are materials that have the potential to adversely impact buried metallic
pipes, concrete, and other underground structures due to their chemical makeup. Factors
that influence soil corrosivity include pH, electrical resistivity, and chemical constituents
(chloride, sulfate, etc.).
Based on investigation, near soils are typically slightly alkaline (pH = 7.5 – 7.9), are slightly
corrosive to uncoated steel, and are very slightly corrosive to concrete materials. On
the basis of this information, there is a potential for site soils to be slightly corrosive to
metallic and concrete building materials. Soil can be classified in Class 1 as per the table no.
4 of IS: 456, 2000. Ordinary Portland cement or Portland pozollana cement shall be used for
all buried RCC structural members. The concrete shall be designed for moderate to severe
exposure condition (as the site is very remote) as suggested in Table no. 3 of IS: 456, 2000.
The minimum cement content shall not be less than 320 kg / m3
and the W/C shall not be
more than 0.50. Clear cover to the reinforcement shall be adequate enough.
3.4.6 Primary Ground Rupture
Primary ground rupture is ground deformation that occurs along the surface trace of the
causative fault during an earthquake. No active faults are known to exist within the subject
site. Therefore, primary ground rupture is not considered a hazard to the project.
ST/02/11/776
Page no.5 of 73

8. 3.4.7 Strong Ground Motion
The site is located within a seismically active region (Zone 3) that is historic seismicity.
Because the site is in a seismically active region, it follows that it will be subjected to future
seismic shaking and strong ground motion resulting from seismic activity along local and
more distant active faults. As such, structural improvements should be designed to
accommodate expected strong ground shaking.
3.4.8 Liquefaction
Liquefaction is a phenomenon whereby, during periods of oscillatory ground motion caused
by an event such as an earthquake, the pore-water pressure in a loose, saturated granular
soil and some fine-grained soils increases to the point where the effective stress in the soil is
zero and the soil loses a portion of its shear strength (initial liquefaction). Structures founded
on or above potentially liquefiable soils may experience bearing capacity failures, vertical
settlement (both total and differential) and lateral displacement (due to lateral spreading
of the ground). The factors known to influence liquefaction potential include soil
characteristics (particle-size distribution, plasticity, and water content), relative density,
presence or absence of groundwater, stress tensor (effective confining stresses, shear
stress) and the intensity and duration of the seismic ground shaking. The granular soils most
susceptible to liquefaction are loose, saturated sands and non-plastic silty soils located
below the water table.
The potential for liquefaction at the site is considered to be nil. This is due to the dense,
finer-grained, sand without water table.
4.0 Results
1) The location plan of Borehole is given in fig No.1
2) The bore log details of Bore hole are shown in fig No. 2 to 26
3) The permeability test result is given in table no.1
4) The Laboratory test results of Bore hole are appended in table no. 2 and 25
5) The electrical test results are given in fig no. 27 to 32
5.0 Conclusions and Recommendations
5.1 General
Based on the results of geotechnical investigation, the site appears suitable,
from a geotechnical standpoint for the proposed development of a solar plant.
5.2 Foundations
5.2.1 The loads and settlement criteria for PV panel support structures, transformers and
control room; are tabulated in Section 1.0. It is recommended to provide shallow
spread footings to support the transformers and control room and the PV panel
support structures.
It is recommended that the base of the shallow spread footings be embedded at least
2.0 m below the overlying ground into stable dune.
ST/02/11/776
Page no.6 of 73

9. 5.2.2 The coefficient of vertical subgrade reaction is estimated as 15 kg per cubic cm
based on the estimated material characteristics (Ref : Terzagi (1955)). These values
assume that the material is not saturated; if the material were saturated the
coefficient of subgrade reaction would be less and of the order of 9.6 kg per cubic
cm. For spread footings an ultimate coefficient of friction of 0.35 may be used. A
factor of safety of at least 1.5 should be applied to the ultimate frictional resistance
for the static case and a factor of safety of at least 1.3 should be applied for cases
that include transient loading (seismic and wind gusts, but not sustained wind load).
5.3 Earthwork
5.3.1 Project will consist of excavation for the foundations for the Buildings or wherever
spread footings are used. Trenches for buried electrical cables are also planned.
Side slope in excavation may remain vertical only for short duration during
construction and therefore side slope of 1V:2H shall be provided. Suitable
arrangement like shoring and strutting may be provided for deeper excavation.
5.3.2 The materials that will be excavated are mainly sand. The sands should be suitable
for reuse in fills that will be overlain by project facilities. The fill material for use in the
fill placed beneath the shallow foundations or in plinth of structures or in sub grade
filling for embankment of road, shall consist of sand excavated from the project site.
K K Thaker Prof. K C Thaker
ME (Geotech); MBA (Finance) M Tech; PhD (Geotech)
ST/02/11/776
Page no.7 of 73

10. Sr.
Length Width C φ Nc Nq - 1 Nγ Sc Sq Sγ dc dq dγ ic iq iγ γ 0.5 γ
No. m m m Kg/cm2 degree gm/cc Wq Wγ t / m2
1 1.50 1.50 2.00 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.36 1.18 1.18 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 12
2 2.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.27 1.14 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 12
3 2.50 2.50 2.00 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.22 1.11 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 13
4 3.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.18 1.09 1.09 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 13
5 1.50 1.50 2.50 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.45 1.23 1.23 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 15
6 2.00 2.00 2.50 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.34 1.17 1.17 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 15
7 2.50 2.50 2.50 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.27 1.14 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 16
8 3.00 3.00 2.50 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.23 1.11 1.11 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 16
9 1.50 1.50 3.00 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.54 1.27 1.27 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 18
10 2.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.41 1.20 1.20 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 18
11 2.50 2.50 3.00 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.33 1.16 1.16 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 18
12 3.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 25 14.49 5.27 5.39 1.30 1.20 0.80 1.27 1.14 1.14 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.61 0.81 1.00 1.00 19
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
APPENDIX - 1
Calculation of net Safe Bearing Capacity Based on Shear Parameters C - φ
qu = 1 / FS [ 2 / 3 C Nc dc Sc ic + γd (Nq - 1) Sq dq iq Wq + 0.5 γ B Nγ Sγ dγ iγ Wγ ]
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
For Isolated Square Footing
Project :
Depth Factors Inclination Factors Unit Weight Safe
Bearing
Capacity
Size of Foundation Shear Parameter
1) Factor of safety is 2.5
2) Depth of foundation shall be from E G L
Depth of
Foundation
Water Table
Correction
Bearing Capacity Factors Shape Factors
Note :-
ST/02/11/776
Page no.8 of 73

11. Sr. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Width of Footing B
m
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
Net Intensity of
Pressure qnet
T / m2
12
12
13
13
15
15
16
16
18
18
18
19
Shape & Rigid
factor Cd
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
1.05
Poisson's Ratioμ
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
0.35
Modulus of
Elasticity of Soil E
Kg / cm2
149.5
149.5
149.5
149.5
149.5
149.5
149.5
149.5
149.5
149.5
0.73
0.73
149.5
149.5
Correction for depth
0.73
0.73
0.73
0.75
0.73
0.73
0.73
0.73
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Calculation of Immediate Settlement as per IS : 8009
Si = Cd qnet B { ( 1 - μ 2
) / E }
Project:- Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
0.76
0.80
15.1
19.8
Immediate Settlement Si
mm
8.2
11.2
25.1
16.2
20.5
10.2
13.6
17.4
22.3
12.3
ST/02/11/776
Page no.9 of 73

12. NOTATIONS
C Cohesion
φ Angle of internal friction of soil
DS Disturbed Sample
UDS Undisturbed Sample
NMC Natural Moisture Content
NP Non Plastic Soils
G Specific Gravity
G Gravel Content
M Silt Content
S Sand Content
C Clay Content
LL Liquid Limit
PL Plastic Limit
PI Plasticity Index
Cc Compression Index
K Coefficient of Permeability
UCS Unconfined Compression
N SPT Value
BH Bore Hole
Suffix The Number of Bore Holes
Nc,Nq,Nγ Bearing Capacity Factor
Sc,Sq,Sγ Shape Factors
γ Density of Soil
D Depth of foundation
FS Factor of Safety
Cv Coefficient of consolidation
UU Unconsolidated undrained triaxial test
CU Consolidated undrained triaxial test
CD Consolidated drained triaxial test
GC Clayey Gravels
GP Poorely Graded Gravels
GW Well Graded Gravels
SC Clayey Sand
SM Silty Sand
SW Wel Graded Sand
SP Poorly Graded Sand
CH Clays of High Plasticity
CI Clays of Intermediate Plasticity
CL Clays of Low Plasticity
MH Silts of High Plasticity
MI Silts of Intermediate Plasticity
ML Silts of Low Plasticity
ST/02/11/776
Page no.10 of 73

13. REFERENCE
Indian Standards
Murthy V.N.S.
Lambe T.W.
Peck, R.S.Hanson W.E.
Nayak, N.V.
Kaniraj S.R.
Alam Singh
IS 2720 Pt II, III, IV, V, XIII,
XXXI,XXVII,XXVIS1498,IS6403,IS 1904
Soil Mechanics and Foundation
engineering
Dhanpat Rai and Sons Delhi
Soil testing for Engineers
Wiley Easter Ltd., New Delhi
Foundation Engineering
Asia Publishing House
Foundation Engineering Manual
Dhanpat Rai & Sons.
Design Aids in soil mechanics and
Foundation Engineering
Tata Mc Graw Hill Publishing Co. Ltd.
Modern Geotechnical Eng.
IBT Publishing & Distributors Delhi.
ST/02/11/776
Page no.11 of 73

14. TABLE NO. – 1
RESULTS OF LABORATORY PERMEABILITY
Sr.
No.
Bore
Hole
No.
Depth (m) Permeability (mm/s)
1. BH – 4 3.00 0.66 x 10-2
2. BH – 5 3.00 0.62 x 10-2
3. BH – 6 3.00 0.64 x 10-2
4. BH – 7 3.00 0.65 x 10-2
5. BH – 8 3.00 0.62 x 10-2
6. BH – 16 3.00 0.67 x 10-2
7. BH – 17 3.00 0.66 x 10-2
8. BH – 18 3.00 0.62 x 10-2
9. BH – 20 3.00 0.66 x 10
-2
10. BH – 23 3.00 0.62 x 10-2
K.K.Thaker
ST/02/11/776
Page no.12 of 73

15. 1
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm2 % Kg/cm2 Degree Kg/cm2 % %
1 0.00 DS - 3.09 - 0 83 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 0 83 14 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 11 - - -
3 3.00 SPT - - - 0 81 15 4 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
4 4.50 UDS 1.70 3.17 2.65 0 83 15 2 NP NP NP - - - - 36 - - - - 0.61 37.9
5 6.00 UDS 1.73 3.18 2.64 0 86 12 2 NP NP NP - - - - 38 - - - - 0.57 36.4
Cemente
d Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.13 of 73

16. 2
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm2 % Kg/cm2 Degree Kg/cm2 % %
1 0.00 DS - 5.19 - 0 83 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 1 82 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 14 - - -
3 3.00 DS - - - 0 87 10 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
4 4.50 SPT - - - 0 84 13 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
5 6.00 UDS 1.76 5.32 2.64 0 83 15 2 NP NP NP - - - - 37 - - - - 0.58 36.7
Cemente
d Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.14 of 73

17. 3
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm2 % Kg/cm2 Degree Kg/cm2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 1 83 13 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 1 81 15 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 12 - - -
3 3.00 DS - - - 0 84 14 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
4 4.50 SPT - - - 0 83 13 4 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
5 6.00 UDS 1.74 3.97 2.67 0 83 14 3 NP NP NP - - - - 36 - - - - 0.60 37.3
Cemente
d Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.15 of 73

18. 4
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm2 % Kg/cm2 Degree Kg/cm2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 0 83 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 0 86 12 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 13 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.65 3.97 2.62 0 83 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - 28 - - - - 0.65 39.4
4 4.50 SPT - - - 0 84 14 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 22 - - -
5 6.00 UDS 1.74 4.05 2.63 0 87 10 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - 32 - - - - 0.57 36.5
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.16 of 73

19. 5
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm2 % Kg/cm2 Degree Kg/cm2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 2 82 13 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 0 83 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 14 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.68 5.51 2.65 0 85 12 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - 30 - - - - 0.66 39.8
4 4.50 SPT - - - 0 87 10 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
5 6.00 UDS 1.79 5.58 2.64 0 84 14 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - 0.56 35.7
Cemente
d Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.17 of 73

20. 6
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm2 % Kg/cm2 Degree Kg/cm2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 0 85 12 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 1 83 12 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 11 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.66 3.96 2.63 0 83 13 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - 28 - - - - 0.65 39.4
4 4.50 SPT - - - 2 83 13 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 19 - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 0 83 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.18 of 73

21. 7
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 2 82 13 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 1 82 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 14 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.66 5.54 2.65 0 86 12 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - 27 - - - - 0.68 40.6
4 4.50 SPT - - - 1 86 10 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
5 6.00 UDS 1.76 5.67 2.64 1 83 12 4 NP NP NP - - - - 36 - - - - 0.58 36.9
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.19 of 73

22. 8
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 0 83 14 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 2 80 15 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 13 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.68 3.88 2.63 2 86 10 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - 28 - - - - 0.63 38.5
4 4.50 SPT - - - 2 80 14 4 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
5 6.00 UDS 1.75 3.96 2.66 2 84 12 2 NP NP NP - - - - 35 - - - - 0.58 36.6
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.20 of 73

23. 9
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 2 81 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 1 86 10 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 15 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.70 5.90 2.64 1 82 14 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - 31 - - - - 0.64 39.1
4 4.50 SPT - - - 0 83 15 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - 47 - - -
5 6.00 UDS 1.77 5.96 2.66 0 85 12 3 NP NP NP - - - - 34 - - - - 0.59 37.1
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.21 of 73

24. 10
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 2 83 13 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 2 81 13 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 16 - - -
3 3.00 DS - - - 0 83 13 4 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
4 4.50 SPT - - - 2 84 10 4 NP NP NP - - - - - - - 66 - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 1 87 10 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.22 of 73

25. 11
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 0 84 13 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 15 71 12 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 18 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.79 2.46 2.66 0 83 14 3 NP NP NP - - - - 38 - - - - 0.52 34.2
4 4.50 SPT - - - 1 86 10 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 0 83 14 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.23 of 73

26. 12
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 0 86 12 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 4 81 13 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 16 - - -
3 3.00 DS - - - 0 87 10 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
4 4.50 SPT - - - 2 81 15 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
5 6.00 UDS 1.88 4.93 2.63 1 82 14 3 NP NP NP - - - - 39 - - - - 0.47 31.8
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.24 of 73

27. 13
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 0 82 14 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 2 82 14 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - 36 - - -
3 3.00 DS - - - 2 81 13 4 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
4 4.50 SPT - - - 1 84 12 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
5 6.00 UDS 1.86 2.15 2.67 2 84 12 2 NP NP NP - - - - 38 - - - - 0.47 31.8
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.25 of 73

28. 14
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 2 82 13 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 1 83 12 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 11 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.76 2.43 2.64 15 68 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - 33 - - - - 0.54 34.9
4 4.50 SPT - - - 0 84 13 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - 77 - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 2 81 14 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.26 of 73

29. 15
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 0 85 13 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 1 85 10 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 14 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.70 3.48 2.65 14 68 14 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - 32 - - - - 0.61 38.0
4 4.50 SPT - - - 1 83 13 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - 72 - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 0 82 15 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.27 of 73

30. 16
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 5 79 12 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 4 78 14 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 14 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.68 2.91 2.66 6 76 14 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - 34 - - - - 0.63 38.6
4 4.50 SPT - - - 1 83 14 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - 80 - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 1 82 13 4 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.28 of 73

31. 17
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 0 85 13 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 1 82 14 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 11 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.72 3.74 2.65 3 82 13 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - 31 - - - - 0.60 37.4
4 4.50 SPT - - - 1 81 15 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - 86 - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 0 84 13 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.29 of 73

32. 18
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 2 81 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 2 82 12 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 9 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.61 3.81 2.64 4 84 10 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - 25 - - - - 0.70 41.3
4 4.50 SPT - - - 1 84 12 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - 44 - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 1 87 10 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.30 of 73

33. 19
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 2 82 13 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 0 84 14 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 11 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.67 3.22 2.66 2 83 12 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - 31 - - - - 0.64 39.2
4 4.50 SPT - - - 2 83 12 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - 60 - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 2 82 13 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.31 of 73

34. 20
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 1 86 10 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 2 81 14 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 11 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.72 3.24 2.65 1 82 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - 27 - - - - 0.59 37.1
4 4.50 SPT - - - 2 81 14 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 0 86 12 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.32 of 73

35. 21
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 2 86 10 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 10 73 15 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 9 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.63 2.78 2.65 8 75 13 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - 26 - - - - 0.67 40.2
4 4.50 SPT - - - 0 87 10 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
5 6.00 UDS 1.82 3.42 2.75 0 84 14 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - 0.56 36.0
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.33 of 73

36. 22
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 0 82 14 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 13 72 13 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - >100 - - -
3 3.00 DS - - - 1 86 10 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
4 4.50 DS - - - 1 82 13 4 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
5 6.00 UDS 1.73 2.67 2.69 0 81 15 4 NP NP NP - - - - 40 - - - - 0.60 37.4
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.34 of 73

37. 23
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 0 86 12 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 2 81 14 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - 11 - - -
3 3.00 UDS 1.73 2.13 2.69 0 85 13 2 NP NP NP - - - SM - 28 - - - - 0.59 37.0
4 4.50 SPT - - - 2 85 10 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 1 84 13 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.35 of 73

38. 24
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 2 84 10 4 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 0 83 15 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
3 3.00 DS - - - 2 82 13 3 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
4 4.50 DS - - - 0 85 13 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 2 82 12 4 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.36 of 73

39. 25
m gm / cc % % % % % % % % % Kg/cm
2 % Kg/cm
2 Degree Kg/cm
2 % %
1 0.00 DS - - - 0 83 14 3 NP NP NP - - - SM - - - - - - - -
2 1.50 SPT - - - 1 84 13 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - > 100 - - -
3 3.00 DS - - - 2 84 12 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
4 4.50 DS - - - 1 80 15 4 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
5 6.00 DS - - - 0 85 13 2 NP NP NP - - - - - - - - - - -
Cemented
Sand
Porosity
Sr
No
RockQuality
Designation
C φ
Unconfined
Compression
Test
CompressionIndexCC
FreeSwellIndex
Plasticity
Index
Shrinkage
Limit
SPTNValue
VoidRatio
Silt
Clay
Liquid
Limit
Plastic
Limit
Shear Parameter
Swelling
Pressure
Consistancy limits
SoilClassification
Project :-
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
RESULTS OF LABORATORY TEST
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Grain Size AnalysisField
Density
Natural
Moisture
Content
SpecificGravity
Gravel
Sand
Type of
Sample
BH No. :-
Depth
ST/02/11/776
Page no.37 of 73

40. ST/02/11/776
Page no.38 of 73

41. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 0.00 to 2.20 m 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 4 4 7 11 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 SPT 25 42 50 >100 - -
3.50 6cm
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 CORE - - - - 15.6 -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.30 CORE - - - - 19.2 -
2.20 to 6.00 m
Remarks
Method of
Boring
Depth Notation
Soil Description
Brownish and slightly greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)
Brownish and greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to
strongly cemented silty sand
m
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 1
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
NotUsed
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Casing
Type of
Sample
Rotarydrillingmethod
ST/02/11/776
Page no.39 of 73

42. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 0.00 to 2.10 m 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 3 6 8 14 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 DS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 56 27 - >100 - -
5.00 11cm
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.10 CORE - - - - 19.2 -
to 6.00 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
Depth of
Sample Remarks
m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and slightly greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)
Brownish and greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to
strongly cemented silty sand
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.SDepth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 2
ST/02/11/776
Page no.40 of 73

43. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 Brownish and slightly greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)0.00 to 0.60 m
0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 4 5 7 12 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 DS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 38 49 - >100 - -
5.00 6cm
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.25 CORE - - - - 13.60 -
2.50 to 6.00 m
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S Core
Recovery
(%)
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Yellowish brown and slightly greyish, fine to very fine grained,
silty sand with occational gravels (SM)0.60 to 2.50 m
Brownish and greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to
strongly cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description
Depth of
Sample Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
Bore Hole No. : 3
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.41 of 73

44. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 4 6 7 13 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 1.40 to 5.20 m 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 4 9 13 22 - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.50 CORE - - - - 15.6 -
to 6.00 m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Greyish and slightly brownish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand (SM)
Brownish grey, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with
occational gravels (SM) 0.00 to 1.40 m
Brownish and greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to
strongly cemented silty sand
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Bore Hole No. : 4
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.42 of 73

45. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 5 7 7 14 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 34 25 - >100 - -
5.00 6cm
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.15 CORE - - - - 10.3 -
3.70 to 6.00 m
m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and slightly greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)0.00 to 1.20 m
Yellowish brown, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with
occational gravels (SM) 1.20 to 2.80 m
Greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with little plastic
fines and occational gravels (SM)2.80 to 3.70 m
Brownish and greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to
strongly cemented silty sand
Type of
Sample
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Remarks
Bore Hole No. : 5
Soil Description
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.43 of 73

46. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 3 4 7 11 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 0.00 to 5.20 m 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 5 8 11 19 - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.50 DS - - - - - -
5.2 to 6.00 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
Depth of
Sample Remarks
m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and slightly greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)
Greyish, fine to very fine grained, siltys and with much gravels
and rock fragments (SM)
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.SDepth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 6
ST/02/11/776
Page no.44 of 73

47. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 3 6 8 14 - -
2.00 0.00 to 2.80 m
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 24 75 - >100 - -
5.00 14cm
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.20 CORE - - - - 11.0 -
4.20 to 6.00 m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and slightly greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)
Greyish and slightly yellowish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)2.80 to 4.20 m
Brownish and greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to
strongly cemented silty sand
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Bore Hole No. : 7
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.45 of 73

48. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 Brownish grey, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with
occational gravels (SM) 0.00 to 0.80 m
0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 3 6 7 13 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 45 55 - >100 - -
5.00 11cm
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.30 CORE - - - - - -
3.60 to 6.00 m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Yellowish brown and greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand
with little gravels and occational pebble size rock fragments
(SM) 0.80 to 1.80 m
Greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with little gravels
and occational rock fragments (SM)1.80 to 3.60 m
Brownish and greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to
strongly cemented silty sand
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Bore Hole No. : 8
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.46 of 73

49. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 4 6 9 15 - -
2.00 0.00 to 2.70 m
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 15 20 27 47 - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.30 DS - - - - - -
to 6.00 m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and slightly yellowish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)
Greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with some gravels
and occational pebbles and cobles size rock fragments (SM)
2.70 to 4.20 m
Brownish and greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to
strongly cemented silty sand
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Bore Hole No. : 9
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.47 of 73

50. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 4 6 10 16 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 DS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 15 26 40 66 - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.30 DS - - - - - -
to 6.00 m
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S Core
Recovery
(%)
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and slightly yellowish grey, fine to very fine grained,
silty sand with occational gravels (SM)0.00 to 1.90 m
Brownish and greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to
strongly cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description
Depth of
Sample Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
Bore Hole No. : 10
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.48 of 73

51. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 0.00 to 2.30 m 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 4 7 11 18 - -
2.00
2.50
Greyish, fine to medium grained, silty sand with much gravels
and cobbles size fracturred rock(SM) 2.30 to 3.00 m
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 20 36 42 >100 - -
5.00 8cm
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.30 DS - - - - - -
3.00 to 6.00 m
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S Core
Recovery
(%)
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Yellowish brown, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with little
gravels (SM)
Greyish, fine to very fine grained, moderately to strongly
cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description
Depth of
Sample Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
Bore Hole No. : 11
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.49 of 73

52. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00
Brownish grey and slightly yellowish, fine to very fine grained,
silty sand with occational gravels (SM)0.00 to 0.70 m
0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 3 7 9 16 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 DS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 26 45 59 >100 - -
5.00 6cm
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.35 CORE - - - - 9.7 -
2.50 to 6.00 m
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S Core
Recovery
(%)
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish grey and slightly yellowish, fine to very fine grained,
silty sand with little gravels (SM) 0.70 to 2.50 m
Greyish, fine to very fine grained, moderately to strongly
cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description
Depth of
Sample Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
Bore Hole No. : 12
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.50 of 73

53. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 Brownish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with occational
gravels (SM) 0.00 to 0.70 m
0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 10 16 20 36 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 DS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 45 66 - >100 - -
5.00 7cm
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.25 CORE - - - - 13.1 -
to 6.00 m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Greyish, fine to very fine grained, modeately to strongly
cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Remarks
m
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
Bore Hole No. : 13
Location : BHADLA
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.51 of 73

54. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 3 5 6 11 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 25 37 40 77 - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.20 DS - - - - - -
to 6.00 m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and slightl yellowish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)0.00 to 1.80 m
Brownish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with little plastic
fines and much gravels (SM) 1.80 to 3.40 m
Greyish and slightly brownish, fine to medium grained,
moderately to strongly cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 14
ST/02/11/776
Page no.52 of 73

55. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 4 6 8 14 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50 1.80 to 4.20 m
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 18 25 47 72 - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.50 DS - - - - - -
4.20 to 6.00 m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and slightly yellowish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)0.00 to 1.80 m
Brownish and slightly yellowish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with some gravels and pebbles size rock fragments (SM)
Greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to strongly
cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 15
ST/02/11/776
Page no.53 of 73

56. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 4 5 9 14 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50 1.60 to 4.10 m
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 26 40 40 80 - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.45 DS - - - - - -
4.10 to 6.00 m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Yellowish brown and greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand
with little gravels (SM) 0.00 to 1.60 m
Greyish yellow, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with little
gravels (SM)
Greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to strongly
cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 16
ST/02/11/776
Page no.54 of 73

57. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 3 4 7 11 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 28 36 50 86 - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.25 DS - - - - - -
3.70 to 6.00 m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and slightly yellowish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)0.00 to 1.80 m
Brownish and slightly yellowish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with little gravels(SM) 1.80 to 3.70 m
Greyish brown, fine to medium grained, moderately to strongly
cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 17
ST/02/11/776
Page no.55 of 73

58. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 3 3 6 9 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50 1.40 to 4.10 m
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 10 16 28 44 - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.20 DS - - - - - -
4.10 to 6.00 m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and slightl yellowish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)0.00 to 1.40 m
Greyish and slightly yellowish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with little gravels and occational pebbles size rocks
fragments (SM)
Greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to strongly
cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 18
ST/02/11/776
Page no.56 of 73

59. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 2 4 7 11 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 15 26 34 60 - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.30 DS - - - - - -
3.20 to 6.00 m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish,fine to very fine grained, silty sand with occational
gravels (SM) 0.00 to 1.10 m
Yellowish brown and greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand
with occational gravels (SM)1.10 to 3.20 m
Greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to strongly
cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 19
ST/02/11/776
Page no.57 of 73

60. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 3 5 6 11 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 22 31 60 >100 - -
5.00 10cm
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.15 DS - - - - - -
4.30 to 6.00 m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and slightly yellowish, fine to very fine grained, silty
sand with occational gravels (SM)0.00 to 1.40 m
Greyish, fine to medium grained, silty sand with occational
gravels (SM) 1.40 to 2.40 m
Greyish, fine to medium grained, silty sand with occational
gravels and occational pebbles (SM)2.40 to 4.30 m
Brownish grey, fine to very fine grained,moderately to strongly
cemented silty sand
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
Soil Description
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 20
ST/02/11/776
Page no.58 of 73

61. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 3 4 5 9 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50 1.70 to 4.00 m
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 25 60 - >100 - -
5.00 8cm
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.20 CORE - - - - 8.2 -
4.00 to 6.00 m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with occational
gravels (SM) 0.00 to 1.70 m
Brownish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with some gravels
and occational pebbles size rock fragments (SM)
Brownish grey, fine to very fine grained, moderately to strongly
cemented sitly sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 21
ST/02/11/776
Page no.59 of 73

62. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00
Brownish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with occational
gravels (SM) 0.00 to 0.70 m
0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 25 53 - >100 - -
2.00 3cm
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 DS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 DS - - - - - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.30 CORE - - - - 14.8 -
1.80 to 6.00 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
Depth of
Sample Remarks
m
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with rock fragment
(SM) 0.70 to 1.80 m
Greyish and brownish, fine to medium grained,moderatley to
strongly cemented silty sand
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.SDepth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
Bore Hole No. : 22
ST/02/11/776
Page no.60 of 73

63. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00
Brownish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with occational
gravels (SM) 0.00 to 0.80 m
0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 4 4 7 11 - -
2.00
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 UDS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 SPT 22 53 60 >100 - -
5.00 8cm
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.50 DS - - - - - -
4.00 to 6.00 m
Type of
Sample
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Yellowish brown, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with
occational gravels (SM) 0.80 to 2.70 m
Greyish, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with occational
gravels (SM) 2.70 to 4.00 m
Greyish, fine to medium grained, moderately to strongly
cemented silty sand
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description Remarks
m
Bore Hole No. : 23
Depth of
Sample
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
Core
Recovery
(%)
RQD
(%)
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.61 of 73

64. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00 0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 38 - - >100 - -
2.00 7cm
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 DS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 DS - - - - - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.10 DS - - - - - -
1.60 to 6.00 m
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S Core
Recovery
(%)
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Yellowish brown, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with
occational gravels (SM) 0.00 to 1.50 m
Greyish and brownish, fine to medium grained, moderately to
strongly cemented silty sand
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description
Depth of
Sample Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
Bore Hole No. : 24
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.62 of 73

65. From To
m m m N 1 N 2 N 3 N
0.00
0.00 0.00 1.50 DS - - - - - -
0.50
1.00
1.50 1.50 1.50 3.00 SPT 45 - - >100 - -
2.00 10cm
2.50
3.00 3.00 3.00 4.50 DS - - - - - -
3.50
4.00
4.50 4.50 4.50 6.00 DS - - - - - -
5.00
5.50
6.00 6.00 6.00 6.45 DS - - - - - -
1.10 to 6.00 m
SPT N Value/Penetration of S.S.S Core
Recovery
(%)
Rotarydrillingmethod
NotUsed
Brownish and yellowish, fine to medium grained, moderately to
strongly cemented silty sand
Yellowish brown, fine to very fine grained, silty sand with
occational gravels (SM) 0.00 to 1.10 m
BORE LOG DATA SHEET
Method of
Boring
Depth
Casing
Notation
Soil Description
Depth of
Sample Remarks
m
Type of
Sample
Bore Hole No. : 25
Drill Run
Location : BHADLA
Depth of Termination : 6.0 m
RQD
(%)
Depth of Water Table : Not encountered upto depth of investigation
KCT Consultancy Services, Ahmedabad
Project : Proposed Solar Power Park at Jodhpur , for Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Limited
ST/02/11/776
Page no.63 of 73

66. ρ =
π =
S =
R =
V =
I =
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Resistivity at given depth ρ = 2 π S R
Where
Resistivity in ohm - m ( Ω m )
40.58
34.41
Average Resistivity
( Ω - m )
KCT Consultancy Services
RESULTS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY
( IS : 3043, 1987 )
1
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Good
52.17
55.44
53.72
50.59
15.20
28.61
38.79
46.53
Spacing of
Electrode in (
m )
Direction
N - S
Value of pi - 22 / 7
Electrode Spacing ( equal to the depth at which resistivity is determined ) in m
Resistence Observed in Ω
V / I in ohm ( Ω )
Voltage Drop between inner electrodes in Volt
Current applied in outer electrodes in Amp.
Name of Project :
Battery Condition :
Climatic Condition : Cold and dry
ERT No. :
E - W
Resistence Observed in Ω
3.15
2.95
Resistivity ρ in Ω m
19.79
37.07
2.92
2.76
2.76
2.47
2.41
2.18
2.28
1.93
1.65
1.36
0.93
0.76
52.02
62.08
71.63
72.76
72.57
68.36
52.59
47.75
1.90
1.76
1.42
1.17
0.87
0.62
Resistivity ρ in Ω m
18.35
34.68
45.43
54.79
59.69
66.35
62.45
58.81
49.20
38.96
Average Reistivity V/S. Depth
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00
Average Resistivity in Ω - m
Depthinm
ST/02/11/776
Page no.64 of 73

67. 1 726.2 15.20
2 2571.5 28.61
3 4726.7 38.79
4 6802.4 46.53
5 8551.0 52.17
6 9655.2 55.44
7 9064.8 53.72
8 8040.7 50.59
9 5174.6 40.58
10 3720.4 34.41
Depth of
resistivity in
m
Area of the
polar
diagram
Radius of the
circle having
same area as
polar
diagram
Average Resistivity at a given depth shall
be equal to the radius of equivalent area
circle having same as area as that of polar
diagram at that level.
Depth 1.0 m Depth 2.0 m Depth 3.0 m
ERT No. :
Name of Project :
1
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla,
Jodhpur
Depth 10.0 m
KCT Consultancy Services
POLAR DIAGRAMS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY RESULTS
( IS : 3043, 1987 )
Depth 4.0 m
Depth 7.0 m
Depth 5.0 m Depth 6.0 m
Depth 8.0 m Depth 9.0 m
17.50
18.00
18.50
19.00
19.50
20.00
N
E
S
W 33.00
34.00
35.00
36.00
37.00
38.00
N
E
S
W 42.00
44.00
46.00
48.00
50.00
52.00
54.00
N
E
S
W
50.00
55.00
60.00
65.00
N
E
S
W 50.00
55.00
60.00
65.00
70.00
75.00
N
E
S
W 62.00
64.00
66.00
68.00
70.00
72.00
74.00
N
E
S
W
55.00
60.00
65.00
70.00
75.00
N
E
S
W 50.00
55.00
60.00
65.00
70.00
N
E
S
W 46.00
48.00
50.00
52.00
54.00
N
E
S
W
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
N
E
S
W
ST/02/11/776
Page no.65 of 73

68. ρ =
π =
S =
R =
V =
I =
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Resistivity at given depth ρ = 2 π S R
Where
Resistivity in ohm - m ( Ω m )
60.63
52.45
Average Resistivity
( Ω - m )
KCT Consultancy Services
RESULTS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY
( IS : 3043, 1987 )
2
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Good
65.45
69.13
69.21
68.92
18.41
34.45
48.22
58.52
Spacing of
Electrode in (
m )
Direction
N - S
Value of pi - 22 / 7
Electrode Spacing ( equal to the depth at which resistivity is determined ) in m
Resistence Observed in Ω
V / I in ohm ( Ω )
Voltage Drop between inner electrodes in Volt
Current applied in outer electrodes in Amp.
Name of Project :
Battery Condition :
Climatic Condition : Cold and dry
ERT No. :
E - W
Resistence Observed in Ω
3.51
3.27
Resistivity ρ in Ω m
22.05
41.09
3.84
3.61
3.06
2.73
3.36
3.12
2.47
2.13
1.76
1.53
1.22
0.96
57.68
68.61
77.60
80.30
77.41
76.91
68.99
60.32
2.76
2.48
2.21
1.93
1.48
1.14
Resistivity ρ in Ω m
24.13
45.36
63.33
78.41
86.71
93.49
97.20
97.01
83.69
71.63
Average Reistivity V/S. Depth
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00 80.00
Average Resistivity in Ω - m
Depthinm
ST/02/11/776
Page no.66 of 73

69. 1 1064.2 18.41
2 3728.2 34.45
3 7306.2 48.22
4 10760.4 58.52
5 13456.6 65.45
6 15014.9 69.13
7 15048.4 69.21
8 14921.7 68.92
9 11547.7 60.63
10 8641.0 52.45
Depth of
resistivity in
m
Area of the
polar
diagram
Radius of the
circle having
same area as
polar
diagram
Average Resistivity at a given depth shall
be equal to the radius of equivalent area
circle having same as area as that of polar
diagram at that level.
Depth 1.0 m Depth 2.0 m Depth 3.0 m
ERT No. :
Name of Project :
2
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla,
Jodhpur
Depth 10.0 m
KCT Consultancy Services
POLAR DIAGRAMS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY RESULTS
( IS : 3043, 1987 )
Depth 4.0 m
Depth 7.0 m
Depth 5.0 m Depth 6.0 m
Depth 8.0 m Depth 9.0 m
21.00
22.00
23.00
24.00
25.00
N
E
S
W 38.00
40.00
42.00
44.00
46.00
N
E
S
W 54.00
56.00
58.00
60.00
62.00
64.00
N
E
S
W
60.00
65.00
70.00
75.00
80.00
N
E
S
W 70.00
75.00
80.00
85.00
90.00
N
E
S
W 70.00
75.00
80.00
85.00
90.00
95.00
N
E
S
W
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W
50.00
55.00
60.00
65.00
70.00
75.00
N
E
S
W
ST/02/11/776
Page no.67 of 73

70. ρ =
π =
S =
R =
V =
I =
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Resistivity at given depth ρ = 2 π S R
Where
Resistivity in ohm - m ( Ω m )
60.68
56.07
Average Resistivity
( Ω - m )
KCT Consultancy Services
RESULTS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY
( IS : 3043, 1987 )
3
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Good
64.13
64.82
62.95
61.55
18.07
33.27
45.76
54.80
Spacing of
Electrode in (
m )
Direction
N - S
Value of pi - 22 / 7
Electrode Spacing ( equal to the depth at which resistivity is determined ) in m
Resistence Observed in Ω
V / I in ohm ( Ω )
Voltage Drop between inner electrodes in Volt
Current applied in outer electrodes in Amp.
Name of Project :
Battery Condition :
Climatic Condition : Cold and dry
ERT No. :
E - W
Resistence Observed in Ω
3.42
3.21
Resistivity ρ in Ω m
21.49
40.34
3.80
3.43
2.92
2.63
3.17
2.84
2.47
2.17
1.73
1.56
1.33
1.06
55.04
66.10
77.60
81.81
76.09
78.41
75.21
66.60
2.65
2.14
1.86
1.51
1.36
1.18
Resistivity ρ in Ω m
23.88
43.10
59.75
71.38
83.25
80.68
81.81
75.90
76.91
74.14
Average Reistivity V/S. Depth
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00
Average Resistivity in Ω - m
Depthinm
ST/02/11/776
Page no.68 of 73

71. 1 1026.1 18.07
2 3477.4 33.27
3 6577.7 45.76
4 9435.9 54.80
5 12920.3 64.13
6 13199.8 64.82
7 12449.3 62.95
8 11903.4 61.55
9 11568.2 60.68
10 9875.9 56.07
Depth of
resistivity in
m
Area of the
polar
diagram
Radius of the
circle having
same area as
polar
diagram
Average Resistivity at a given depth shall
be equal to the radius of equivalent area
circle having same as area as that of polar
diagram at that level.
Depth 1.0 m Depth 2.0 m Depth 3.0 m
ERT No. :
Name of Project :
3
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla,
Jodhpur
Depth 10.0 m
KCT Consultancy Services
POLAR DIAGRAMS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY RESULTS
( IS : 3043, 1987 )
Depth 4.0 m
Depth 7.0 m
Depth 5.0 m Depth 6.0 m
Depth 8.0 m Depth 9.0 m
20.00
21.00
22.00
23.00
24.00
N
E
S
W 38.00
39.00
40.00
41.00
42.00
43.00
44.00
N
E
S
W 52.00
54.00
56.00
58.00
60.00
N
E
S
W
62.00
64.00
66.00
68.00
70.00
72.00
N
E
S
W 74.00
76.00
78.00
80.00
82.00
84.00
N
E
S
W 80.00
80.50
81.00
81.50
82.00
N
E
S
W
72.00
74.00
76.00
78.00
80.00
82.00
N
E
S
W 74.00
75.00
76.00
77.00
78.00
79.00
N
E
S
W 74.00
75.00
76.00
77.00
N
E
S
W
60.00
65.00
70.00
75.00
N
E
S
W
ST/02/11/776
Page no.69 of 73

72. ρ =
π =
S =
R =
V =
I =
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Resistivity at given depth ρ = 2 π S R
Where
Resistivity in ohm - m ( Ω m )
43.15
35.20
Average Resistivity
( Ω - m )
KCT Consultancy Services
RESULTS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY
( IS : 3043, 1987 )
4
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Good
49.76
53.09
50.06
47.34
15.01
27.67
37.82
45.10
Spacing of
Electrode in (
m )
Direction
N - S
Value of pi - 22 / 7
Electrode Spacing ( equal to the depth at which resistivity is determined ) in m
Resistence Observed in Ω
V / I in ohm ( Ω )
Voltage Drop between inner electrodes in Volt
Current applied in outer electrodes in Amp.
Name of Project :
Battery Condition :
Climatic Condition : Cold and dry
ERT No. :
E - W
Resistence Observed in Ω
2.41
2.17
Resistivity ρ in Ω m
15.14
27.27
3.72
3.51
1.94
1.75
3.26
2.89
1.51
1.32
1.10
0.86
0.72
0.53
36.57
43.98
47.44
49.76
48.38
43.23
40.72
33.30
2.61
2.36
1.85
1.62
1.27
0.93
Resistivity ρ in Ω m
23.37
44.11
61.45
72.63
82.00
88.97
81.37
81.43
71.82
58.43
Average Reistivity V/S. Depth
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00
Average Resistivity in Ω - m
Depthinm
ST/02/11/776
Page no.70 of 73

73. 1 707.9 15.01
2 2405.6 27.67
3 4494.2 37.82
4 6389.2 45.10
5 7779.4 49.76
6 8854.8 53.09
7 7873.2 50.06
8 7040.2 47.34
9 5848.0 43.15
10 3891.8 35.20
Depth of
resistivity in
m
Area of the
polar
diagram
Radius of the
circle having
same area as
polar
diagram
Average Resistivity at a given depth shall
be equal to the radius of equivalent area
circle having same as area as that of polar
diagram at that level.
Depth 1.0 m Depth 2.0 m Depth 3.0 m
ERT No. :
Name of Project :
4
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla,
Jodhpur
Depth 10.0 m
KCT Consultancy Services
POLAR DIAGRAMS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY RESULTS
( IS : 3043, 1987 )
Depth 4.0 m
Depth 7.0 m
Depth 5.0 m Depth 6.0 m
Depth 8.0 m Depth 9.0 m
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
N
E
S
W
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
N
E
S
W
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
N
E
S
W
ST/02/11/776
Page no.71 of 73

74. ρ =
π =
S =
R =
V =
I =
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Resistivity at given depth ρ = 2 π S R
Where
Resistivity in ohm - m ( Ω m )
47.15
38.77
Average Resistivity
( Ω - m )
KCT Consultancy Services
RESULTS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY
( IS : 3043, 1987 )
5
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla, Jodhpur
Good
61.71
62.50
60.86
58.46
18.32
34.50
47.70
55.74
Spacing of
Electrode in (
m )
Direction
N - S
Value of pi - 22 / 7
Electrode Spacing ( equal to the depth at which resistivity is determined ) in m
Resistence Observed in Ω
V / I in ohm ( Ω )
Voltage Drop between inner electrodes in Volt
Current applied in outer electrodes in Amp.
Name of Project :
Battery Condition :
Climatic Condition : Cold and dry
ERT No. :
E - W
Resistence Observed in Ω
3.12
2.84
Resistivity ρ in Ω m
19.60
35.69
4.28
4.17
2.62
2.17
3.84
3.56
1.93
1.72
1.46
1.13
0.86
0.65
49.39
54.54
60.63
64.84
64.21
56.80
48.63
40.84
3.14
2.51
2.06
1.88
1.27
0.92
Resistivity ρ in Ω m
26.89
52.40
72.38
89.47
98.65
94.62
90.60
94.50
71.82
57.81
Average Reistivity V/S. Depth
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 40.00 50.00 60.00 70.00
Average Resistivity in Ω - m
Depthinm
ST/02/11/776
Page no.72 of 73

75. 1 1054.4 18.32
2 3740.3 34.50
3 7149.3 47.70
4 9759.3 55.74
5 11962.4 61.71
6 12271.4 62.50
7 11636.1 60.86
8 10735.1 58.46
9 6985.2 47.15
10 4721.6 38.77
Depth of
resistivity in
m
Area of the
polar
diagram
Radius of the
circle having
same area as
polar
diagram
Average Resistivity at a given depth shall
be equal to the radius of equivalent area
circle having same as area as that of polar
diagram at that level.
Depth 1.0 m Depth 2.0 m Depth 3.0 m
ERT No. :
Name of Project :
5
Proposed structures of Photovoltaic Solar Power Plant at Solar Park of RREC at village Bhadla,
Jodhpur
Depth 10.0 m
KCT Consultancy Services
POLAR DIAGRAMS OF ELECTRICAL RESISTIVITY RESULTS
( IS : 3043, 1987 )
Depth 4.0 m
Depth 7.0 m
Depth 5.0 m Depth 6.0 m
Depth 8.0 m Depth 9.0 m
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
N
E
S
W
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
100.00
N
E
S
W 0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
80.00
N
E
S
W
0.00
20.00
40.00
60.00
N
E
S
W
ST/02/11/776
Page no.73 of 73

76. Coordinates of RREC Project site (Refer the drawing provided)
SR NO
as
marked
in
drawing
EASTING
1 196981.8
2 197077.3
3 196513.0
4 195881.9
5 194524.9
6 194567.2
7 194089.8
8 195542.8
10 197119.4
11 197219.1
12 196565.7
13 196686.0
14 198236.4
15 196155.8
16 195882.9
17 195914.9
18 195422.3
19 195353.4
20 195254.6
21 194921.8
22 194301.6
23 194333.3
24 194081.3
25 194600.3
26 194642.0
27 197478.1
29 198115.4
30 198366.7
31 198873.6
32 199126.4
33 199637.8
34 199914.8
35 200278.0
36 200178.0
37 200501.8
38 199927.1
39 199472.7
40 199899.5
41 199996.5
42 199806.1
43 199556.2
44 199569.3
45 198950.3
46 198489.3
47 198077.2
48 197689.3
49 196708.6
50 195924.8
51 196731.7
52 196702.8
53 197160.7
54 197320.1
55 197977.3
Solar Park Layout

77. CoordinatesofRRECProjectsite(Referthedrawingprovided)
SRNO
as
marked
in
drawing
EASTING
1196981.8
2197077.3
3196513.0
4195881.9
5194524.9
6194567.2
7194089.8
8195542.8
10197119.4
11197219.1
12196565.7
13196686.0
14198236.4
15196155.8
16195882.9
17195914.9
18195422.3
19195353.4
20195254.6
21194921.8
22194301.6
23194333.3
24194081.3
25194600.3
26194642.0
27197478.1
29198115.4
30198366.7
31198873.6
32199126.4
33199637.8
34199914.8
35200278.0
36200178.0
37200501.8
38199927.1
39199472.7
40199899.5
41199996.5
42199806.1
43199556.2
44199569.3
45198950.3
46198489.3
47198077.2
48197689.3
49196708.6
50195924.8
51196731.7
52196702.8
53197160.7
54197320.1
55197977.3
Contour MAP- Solar Park