Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results

1. February 8, 2016 Bay Village City Council Presentation Draft 2015 Survey Results City of Bay Village

2. About County Planning

3. To inform and provide services in support of the short and long term comprehensive planning, quality of life, environment, and economic development of Cuyahoga County and its cities, villages and townships.

4. Local Expertise + Regional View

5. CPC Board Members by Region (8): Westshore: Honorable Eileen Patton Mayor, City of Fairview Park Southwest: Honorable Cyril Kleem Mayor, City of Berea South Central: Honorable Michael P. Byrne Mayor, City of Parma Heights Cuyahoga: Honorable Michael Procuk Mayor, Village of Brooklyn Heights Cleveland: Mr. Freddie Collier Representing Mayor Jackson Chagrin/SE: Honorable Brad Sellers Mayor, City of Warrensville Heights Hillcrest: Honorable Merle Gorden Mayor, City of Beachwood Heights: Honorable Susan K. Infeld Mayor, City of University Heights Cuyahoga County Representatives (3): Mr. Nathan Kelly, Chair Ms. Sunny Simon, Vice Chair Ms. Shontel Brown Board Structure & Representation

6. 2015 Community Master Plans Cleveland Heights, University Heights, Parma Heights, and Olmsted Falls Beachwood Survey and Community Master Plan Master plan covering land use, transportation, and economic development

7. Countywide Housing Study Plan to determine housing needs, market demand, and best practices Place-Based Economic Development Plan Countywide economic development framework

8. Parma Town Center Task Force Plan for building and branding the city center of Parma GreenPrint Tool for identifying, preserving, and expanding environmental features

9. Eastside Greenway TLCI Multi-modal transportation plan for eastside communities

10. Draft 2015 Survey Results City of Bay Village February 8, 2016 Bay Village City Council Presentation

11. • Methodology + Process • Results Report • Detailed Findings

15. Methodology + Process

16. Formulated Questions Mailed Surveys Follow-Up Postcard Tabulated Results Produced Report

17. Bay Village Survey Total Households 6,043 Households

18. Bay Village Survey Total Households 6,043 Households Mailed Surveys 1,200 Surveys

19. Bay Village Survey Total Households 6,043 Households Mailed Surveys 1,200 Surveys Returned Surveys 576 Surveys Response Rate 48.0%

20. Bay Village Survey Total Households 6,043 Households Mailed Surveys 1,200 Surveys Returned Surveys 576 Surveys Response Rate 48.0% Confidence Level 95% Statistical Error Rate +/- 3.88

21. Results Report

22. • Executive Summary and Introduction • Detailed Findings • Demographics • Appendix A: Numerical Results • Appendix B: Comments • Appendix C: Survey Instrument

27. Detailed Findings

28. • City Qualities • Land Use • Community Events • Parks and Recreation • Transportation • City Services • Housing • Important Issues • Quality of Life

29. City Qualities

30. City Qualities Reasons for Residing in Bay Village 56.0% 55.3% 50.3% 38.0% 29.1% 25.4% 25.4% 21.5% 15.8% 15.6% 13.3% 11.0% 9.1% 8.4% 4.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Close to Lake Erie Feel safe in my neighborhood Quality school system My property is a good investment For the suburban environment Close to family/friends Well-maintained neighborhood Offers type of housing I want Easy access to Downtown… High quality municipal services Access to highways Easy access to city's parks Close to work Housing costs fit budget Close to shopping

31. 56.0% 55.3% 50.3% 38.0% 29.1% 25.4% 25.4% 21.5% 15.8% 15.6% 13.3% 11.0% 9.1% 8.4% 4.9% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% Close to Lake Erie Feel safe in my neighborhood Quality school system My property is a good investment For the suburban environment Close to family/friends Well-maintained neighborhood Offers type of housing I want Easy access to Downtown… High quality municipal services Access to highways Easy access to city's parks Close to work Housing costs fit budget Close to shopping City Qualities Reasons for Residing in Bay Village

34. City Qualities Considerations for Moving from Bay Village 27.2% 49.9% 20.8% 15.1% 13.1% 12.6% 12.6% 11.2% 9.8% 8.3% 8.2% 8.2% 7.1% 6.7% 3.7% 3.4% 2.3% 1.8% 1.2% 0.9% 0.7% 0.2% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% I would not consider moving For lower taxes For a different climate For a smaller house For a retirement friendly community For attached condos/clustered homes For more home for my money For a newer house To be closer to family and/or friends For a larger house To be closer to work/job related For better community facilities For a more rural environment To be able to walk places To be closer to Downtown Cleveland For a higher quality of municipal services For a rental unit For better access to shopping For less traffic congestion For a better school district For a safer community To have better access to highways

39. City Qualities Considerations for Moving from Bay Village 18 to 44 Year Olds • For lower taxes (48.4%) • For a larger house (27.8%) • For more home for my money (27.8%) • To be closer to work/job related (18.3%) • For a different climate (18.3%) 45 to 64 Year Olds • For lower taxes (54.3%) • For a different climate (26.7%) • For a smaller house (14.3%) • For attached condos/clustered homes (13.6%) • For retirement friendly community (13.6%) 65+ Years Old • For lower taxes (40.4%) • For a smaller house (24.0%) • For retirement friendly community (19.1%) • For attached condos/clustered homes (16.9%) • To be closer to family/friends (12.6%)

42. Land Use

43. 26.9% 25.3% 14.3% 9.0% 10.2% 10.1% 7.4% 49.9% 35.5% 37.2% 35.1% 33.2% 32.1% 30.6% 11.1% 17.8% 22.8% 24.0% 30.7% 19.7% 36.6% 31.5% 17.6% 29.3% 14.0% 18.8% 17.4% 23.2% 17.7% 22.7% 39.9% 48.6% 7.8% 13.6% 7.7% 27.6% 14.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Environmentally friendly development is important New homes should match existing design Maintain and attract retail/service stores Focus on mixed-use development Allow more townhouses/condos Major streets should have decorative elements Promote economic development Allow more multi-family residential Grow its population Land Use Agree Neither Disagree Opinions on Land Use Statements

47. Land Use 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old Opinions on Land Use Statements by Age 46.7% 62.1% 69.3% 55.3% 46.6% 27.1% 26.2% 47.5% 50.6% New homes should match the scale and design of existing homes Major streets should have decorative elements (e.g., gateway signs, lamp posts) The City should allow more townhouses or condos in appropriate locations

48. Land Use 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old Opinions on Land Use Statements by Age 46.7% 62.1% 69.3% 55.3% 46.6% 27.1% 26.2% 47.5% 50.6% New homes should match the scale and design of existing homes Major streets should have decorative elements (e.g., gateway signs, lamp posts) The City should allow more townhouses or condos in appropriate locations

49. Community Events

50. Community Events Good Average Poor 46.2% 34.8% 33.0% 38.7% 34.9% 30.4% 35.0% 25.6% 29.2% 27.0% 29.6% 49.4% 53.4% 49.5% 43.7% 46.6% 49.8% 45.1% 53.5% 48.8% 46.5% 42.7% 11.1% 13.8% 14.7% 15.8% 18.1% 16.4% 17.7% 18.5% 23.7% 23.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night BAYarts Art Festival BAYarts Farm + Art Market BAYarts Moondance Bay Library Programs Annual May in Bay 5K Touch-a-Truck Summer Fun Night Bay Days Bay Village Community Christmas Cahoon in June Opinions on Community Events

51. Community Events Opinions on Community Events Event Percent with “No Opinion” Touch-a-Truck 58.7% Annual May in Bay 5K 58.4% BAYarts Moondance 56.5% Bay Village Community Christmas 55.9% Summer Fun Night 53.4% Cahoon in June 53.3% BAYarts Farm + Art Market 32.0% Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night 27.2% BAYarts Art Festival 25.5% Bay Library Programs 18.8% Bay Days 10.3%

52. Community Events Opinions on Community Events Event Percent with “No Opinion” Touch-a-Truck 58.7% Annual May in Bay 5K 58.4% BAYarts Moondance 56.5% Bay Village Community Christmas 55.9% Summer Fun Night 53.4% Cahoon in June 53.3% BAYarts Farm + Art Market 32.0% Lake Erie Nature & Science Center Night 27.2% BAYarts Art Festival 25.5% Bay Library Programs 18.8% Bay Days 10.3% Greaterthan50%Lessthan35%

53. Yes 43.2% No 11.8% Not Sure 45.0% Community Events Would you like to see additional events?

54. Community Events Would you like to see additional events? 64.1% 57.6% 52.5% 36.8% 38.6% 16.7% 18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+

55. Community Events Would you like to see additional events? 64.1% 57.6% 52.5% 36.8% 38.6% 16.7% 18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ Greater than 50% Less than 40%

56. Parks and Recreation

57. Parks and Recreation Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities 52.4% 39.6% 27.8% 21.8% 17.0% 20.3% 15.4% 13.7% 11.3% 8.2% 40.0% 47.0% 53.4% 57.5% 52.6% 48.6% 51.8% 49.3% 41.1% 37.0% 24.4% 9.4% 16.9% 19.0% 21.4% 22.6% 28.6% 34.1% 36.8% 42.0% 28.9% 6.9% 9.3% 12.5% 25.8% 15.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) Bay Village Family Aquatic Center Cahoon Memorial Park Bradley Park Skate and Bike Park Biking and Hiking Trails Dwyer Memorial Senior Center Reese Park (Clague Road) Columbia Park Community House Community Gym/Fitness Room Good Average Poor

60. Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities Event Percent with “No Opinion” Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 49.4% Community Gym/Fitness Room 47.8% Skate and Bike Park 41.8% Community House 38.2% Columbia Park 30.0% Reese Park (Clague Road) 27.0% Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 25.7% Bradley Park 17.9% Biking and Hiking Trails 15.1% Cahoon Memorial Park 7.5% Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 2.8% Parks and Recreation

61. Opinions on Parks and Recreation Facilities Event Percent with “No Opinion” Dwyer Memorial Senior Center 49.4% Community Gym/Fitness Room 47.8% Skate and Bike Park 41.8% Community House 38.2% Columbia Park 30.0% Reese Park (Clague Road) 27.0% Bay Village Family Aquatic Center 25.7% Bradley Park 17.9% Biking and Hiking Trails 15.1% Cahoon Memorial Park 7.5% Huntington Reservation (Cleveland Metroparks) 2.8% Parks and Recreation

62. Ease of Access to Lake Erie Parks and Recreation Excellent 41.8% Good 41.6% Average 10.5% Poor 5.4% Very Poor, 0.7%

63. Yes 29.1% No 25.1% Not Sure 45.8% Would you like to see a new green space constructed next to City Hall? Parks and Recreation

64. Overall Quality of Parks and Recreation Facilities Parks and Recreation Excellent 27.3% Good 57.7% Average 14.3% Poor 0.5% Very Poor, 0.2%

65. Transportation

66. Transportation Opinions on Ease of Getting Around 72.3% 46.2% 42.3% 12.9% 26.5% 43.3% 44.5% 24.2% 16.5% 7.6% 6.7% 56.1% 32.9% 28.8% 17.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Car Walking Bike Senior Transportation Public Transit Agree Neither Disagree

67. Transportation Opinions on Ease of Getting Around 72.3% 46.2% 42.3% 12.9% 26.5% 43.3% 44.5% 24.2% 16.5% 7.6% 6.7% 56.1% 32.9% 28.8% 17.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Car Walking Bike Senior Transportation Public Transit Agree Neither Disagree

68. Transportation Priority for Improvements to Getting Around High Average Low 20.7% 14.4% 13.5% 9.1% 9.1% 30.3% 26.1% 24.5% 18.2% 11.4% 23.7% 30.3% 32.5% 33.8% 26.6% 10.6% 11.6% 10.0% 17.2% 20.5% 14.7% 17.6% 19.5% 21.7% 32.5% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Bike Walking Senior Transportation Public Transit Car

71. Condition of the City’s Sidewalks Transportation Excellent 9.1% Good 45.0% Average 35.6% Poor 9.8% Very Poor, 0.5%

72. City Services

73. City Services Opinions on Quality of City Services 59.0% 53.2% 32.7% 36.9% 33.3% 35.1% 28.6% 20.8% 24.4% 16.7% 11.3% 11.9% 10.6% 12.6% 7.1% 8.3% 8.1% 37.8% 40.7% 56.6% 49.3% 49.5% 46.1% 48.1% 54.5% 47.8% 46.5% 42.7% 40.4% 40.0% 35.0% 37.9% 31.6% 24.0% 9.7% 11.5% 13.2% 14.2% 18.7% 21.7% 22.6% 25.4% 34.9% 37.9% 41.8% 33.2% 35.7% 38.6% 31.7% 9.6% 7.9% 6.3% 13.8% 14.0% 15.5% 20.1% 16.1% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Park maintenance Trash removal & curbside recycling Compost and brush recycling Leaf collection Traffic enforcement Recreational programs Snow removal Senior transportation services Street maintenance/repair Building department City of Bay Village website Tree lawn planting Property maintenance enforcement Sidewalk correction program Water back up/sewer inspection Good Average Poor

78. City Services Opinions on Importance of City Services Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important 92.0% 89.6% 64.8% 75.5% 60.6% 65.7% 52.3% 66.8% 47.5% 37.8% 27.4% 28.5% 35.2% 34.0% 26.5% 19.2% 11.6% 7.5% 9.4% 33.4% 22.6% 37.5% 31.3% 44.5% 29.9% 43.6% 50.1% 54.6% 51.9% 44.9% 44.4% 45.7% 33.3% 38.1% 8.4% 10.0% 15.7% 17.9% 17.5% 19.0% 19.5% 34.7% 36.0% 8.3% 12.8% 14.3% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Fire protection/EMS Police protection Trash removal & curbside recycling Snow removal Street maintenance/repair Leaf collection Park maintenance Water back up/sewer inspection Compost and brush recycling Recreational programs Building department Sidewalk correction program Property maintenance enforcement Traffic enforcement Senior transportation services Tree lawn planting City of Bay Village website

81. City Services Matrix on Importance and Quality

82. City Services Matrix on Importance and Quality Increasingquality Increasing importance

83. City Services Matrix on Importance and Quality Average quality

84. City Services Matrix on Importance and Quality Averageimportance

85. City Services Matrix on Importance and Quality Above average quality, above average importance

86. City Services Matrix on Importance and Quality Below average quality, above average importance

87. City Services Matrix on Importance and Quality Below average quality, below average importance

88. City Services Matrix on Importance and Quality Above average quality, below average importance

89. Overall Quality of City Services Excellent 33.3% Good 57.9% Average 7.9% Poor 0.7% Very Poor, 0.2% City Services

90. Change in Overall Quality of City Services Greatly Improved 3.5% Somewhat Improved 33.0% Stayed the Same 51.8% Somewhat Declined 10.7% Greatly Declined, 0.9% City Services

91. Housing

92. Housing Priority for Types of Housing High Average Low 55.4% 19.9% 14.5% 9.1% 10.9% 8.7% 32.6% 28.2% 31.4% 24.4% 20.9% 21.1% 17.5% 8.8% 10.3% 35.7% 35.2% 40.5% 27.4% 41.7% 37.1% 24.5% 8.7% 12.3% 18.0% 20.1% 20.2% 20.3% 25.6% 7.6% 6.6% 8.0% 20.7% 11.2% 16.3% 36.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Maintain existing housing More options for seniors More single-family detached More walkable options More townhouses/condos More options for young people More infill development More apartments/mixed-use

93. 55.4% 19.9% 14.5% 9.1% 10.9% 8.7% 32.6% 28.2% 31.4% 24.4% 20.9% 21.1% 17.5% 8.8% 10.3% 35.7% 35.2% 40.5% 27.4% 41.7% 37.1% 24.5% 8.7% 12.3% 18.0% 20.1% 20.2% 20.3% 25.6% 7.6% 6.6% 8.0% 20.7% 11.2% 16.3% 36.0% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Maintain existing housing More options for seniors More single-family detached More walkable options More townhouses/condos More options for young people More infill development More apartments/mixed-use Housing Priority for Types of Housing High Average Low

97. 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old More housing options for seniors looking to remain in the City More well-designed single- family, detached homes Housing Priority for Types of Housing 19.5% 46.2% 70.6% 58.5% 45.2% 38.0%

98. 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old More housing options for seniors looking to remain in the City More well-designed single- family, detached homes Housing Priority for Types of Housing 19.5% 46.2% 70.6% 58.5% 45.2% 38.0%

99. 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old More housing options within walking distance to amenities More well-designed townhouses/condos Housing Priority for Types of Housing 25.6% 34.4% 37.4% 16.3% 35.3% 38.4% 6.5% 15.3% 17.3% More well-designed apartments/mixed-use development

100. 18 to 44 Years Old 45 to 64 Years Old More housing options within walking distance to amenities More well-designed townhouses/condos Housing Priority for Types of Housing 25.6% 34.4% 37.4% 16.3% 35.3% 38.4% 6.5% 15.3% 17.3% More well-designed apartments/mixed-use development

101. Since residing in Bay Village, has your basement flooded? Yes 46.1% No 41.2% No Basement 12.3% Not Sure 0.5% Housing

102. If so, how many times has it flooded? Housing Once a month 2.8% Once every six (6) months 5.7% Once a year 9.5% Once every few years 36.0% Rarely, 45.9%

103. Important Issues

104. 82.0% 52.3% 50.2% 51.0% 33.0% 39.0% 30.1% 39.9% 27.6% 28.5% 18.0% 15.0% 12.7% 11.7% 14.1% 11.5% 16.4% 37.2% 38.1% 33.1% 50.4% 41.7% 47.1% 36.9% 44.2% 41.0% 36.4% 32.7% 31.5% 29.1% 26.5% 27.1% 9.4% 9.1% 13.1% 15.4% 16.2% 20.9% 16.3% 23.9% 26.0% 35.1% 31.6% 39.9% 38.4% 34.3% 30.3% 6.9% 10.5% 20.7% 15.9% 20.8% 25.0% 31.2% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ensuring public safety Improving the sewer systems Preserving open space/green space Protecting the environment Improving roads Enhancing the sense of community Improving sidewalks Being able to safely bike to amenities Providing recreational programs Enforcing home maintenance ordinances Providing housing/services for seniors Attracting new retail/services Improving traffic flow Improving public transit Having a diverse community Attracting jobs to Bay Village Important Issues Opinions on Importance of Issues Very Important Important Somewhat Important Not Important

109. 46.4% 15.4% 18.1% 19.7% 18.1% 7.2% 9.6% 6.2% 44.6% 52.3% 48.8% 45.7% 44.0% 45.0% 38.2% 34.5% 31.5% 30.5% 21.8% 18.2% 17.6% 15.4% 13.3% 10.1% 8.6% 29.4% 28.5% 30.8% 33.8% 39.8% 41.8% 46.5% 58.1% 48.3% 56.7% 56.1% 42.1% 65.6% 61.3% 65.9% 6.6% 8.4% 9.2% 13.2% 16.5% 15.2% 21.1% 14.2% 20.7% 19.6% 15.7% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Ensuring public safety Protecting the environment Preserving open space/green space Enhancing the sense of community Providing recreational programs Improving roads Being able to safely bike to amenities Improving sidewalks Improving traffic flow Enforcing home maintenance ordinances Providing housing/services for seniors Having a diverse community Improving the sewer systems Improving public transit Attracting new retail/services Attracting jobs to Bay Village Important Issues Opinions on Current Effectiveness Good Average Poor

113. Important Issues Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance

114. Average effectiveness Important Issues Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance Increasingeffectiveness Increasing importance Average importance

115. Important Issues Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance Above average effectiveness, above average importance

116. Important Issues Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance Below average effectiveness, above average importance

117. Important Issues Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance Below average effectiveness, below average importance

118. Important Issues Matrix of Effectiveness and Importance Above average effectiveness, below average importance

119. Quality of Life

120. Quality of Life Overall Quality of Life Excellent 50.8% Good 45.5% Average 3.5% Poor 0.2%

121. Comments

122. Quality of Life Most Frequent Comments • Parks and Recreation Facilities – Variety of park changes – Concerns about Cahoon Park • Flooding and Sewer System – Roadway and basement flooding • Animal Control – Deer population – Animal control officer

123. Quality of Life Most Frequent Comments • Housing – Fix housing that is deteriorating – Issues concerning infill housing • Transportation – New crosswalks – Safer paths to school – Removal of snow

124. Demographics

125. Demographics Age of Respondents 7.1% 15.2% 21.5% 24.0% 19.6% 12.7% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years 2015 Survey 2014 American Community Survey

126. Demographics Age of Respondents 7.1% 15.2% 21.5% 24.0% 19.6% 12.7% 10.4% 16.0% 24.7% 22.5% 15.3% 11.2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 18 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years 2015 Survey 2014 American Community Survey

127. Demographics Length of Residency 4.9% 9.5% 11.2% 20.9% 21.1% 32.3% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% Under 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years 21-30 years More than 30 years

128. Demographics Planned Length of Residency 6.0% 11.6% 15.2% 16.3% 4.9% 1.8% 44.2% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% 45% 50% Under 2 years 2-5 years 6-10 years 11-20 years 21-30 years More than 30 years I do not intend to move out of Bay Village

129. Demographics Tenure of Respondents Homeowner 97.4% Renter 2.6%

130. Demographics Planned Tenure of Respondents Owning 94.6% Renting 5.4%

131. Demographics Ages of Respondent Household Members 2015 Survey 2014 American Community Survey 24.1% 8.3% 6.7% 9.6% 15.4% 15.9% 13.1% 6.9% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 0 to 17 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years

132. Demographics Ages of Respondent Household Members 2015 Survey 2014 American Community Survey 24.1% 8.3% 6.7% 9.6% 15.4% 15.9% 13.1% 6.9% 24.4% 4.8% 8.6% 12.7% 16.5% 15.7% 9.7% 7.6% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 0 to 17 18 to 24 25 to 34 35 to 44 45 to 54 55 to 64 65 to 74 75+ years

133. Major Themes

134. • Proximity to Lake Erie, safety, and schools are the top reasons people choose to live in Bay Village

135. • Regardless of age, the prime reason residents would consider moving is for a community with lower taxes • Young people are more likely to move for a larger house, while seniors are more likely to move for a smaller house

136. • More than half of respondents want the City to focus on environmentally friendly development, want new homes to match existing design, and want to maintain and attract retail and service stores

137. • More than half of respondents do not want more multi-family residential • Growing the City’s population is not important to respondents

138. • Younger respondents and households with younger respondents want more community events

139. • The City’s parks are rated very highly • There is potential to improve the Community House and Fitness Room

140. • Respondents would like to see improvements to the City’s sidewalks and bikeways

141. • Improvements to street maintenance and water back up/sewer inspection are key areas of importance

142. • Overall, respondents rate the City’s services very highly

143. • Overwhelmingly, respondents want to maintain existing housing and neighborhoods

144. • The City’s seniors would like more housing options—and want a range of townhouses, mixed-use buildings, single- family homes, and walkable neighborhoods

145. • Improving the sewer system, enforcing home maintenance ordinances, and improving sidewalks are key areas for respondents

146. • Quality of life in Bay Village is rated very highly across the board

148. Thank you! Questions?

Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results

Similar to Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results (20)

More from Cuyahoga County Planning Commission

More from Cuyahoga County Planning Commission (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Bay Village Draft 2015 Survey Results