An Overview Of
the BASEL iii
Presented by:
Rana Faisal Ali
Wajahat Hussain
Muneeb Rana
Azhar Sadiq
Introduction:
• Basel is a city in Switzerland which is also
the headquarters of Bureau of International
Settlement (BIS).
• BIS’s common goal:
 financial stability
 common standards
• BIS have 27 member nations in the
committee.
Basel – I Norms
In 1988, the Basel I Capital Accord was created. The
general purpose was to:
1. Strengthen the stability of international banking
system.
2. Set up a fair and a consistent international banking
system in order to decrease competitive inequality
among international banks.
Limitations of Basel – I Norms
• Limited differentiation of credit risk
• Static measure of default risk
• No recognition of term-structure of credit risk
• Simplified calculation of potential future counter party
risk
• Lack of recognition of portfolio diversification effects
Basel – II Norms
Basel – II norms are based on 3 pillars:
• Minimum Capital – Banks must hold capital against
8% of their assets, after adjusting their assets for risk
• Supervisory Review – It is the process whereby
national regulators ensure their home country banks
are following the rules.
• Market Discipline – It is based on enhanced disclosure
of risk
Pitfalls of Basel – II norms
• Too much regulatory compliance
• Over Focusing on Credit Risk
• The new Accord is complex and therefore demanding
for supervisors, and unsophisticated banks
• Strong risk differentiation in the new Accord can
adversely affect the borrowing position of risky
borrowers
Advantages of Basel II over I
• The discrepancy between economic capital and
regulatory capital is reduced significantly, due to that
the regulatory requirements will rely on banks’ own
risk methods.
• More Risk sensitive
• Wider recognition of credit risk mitigation.
Basel – III Norms
Basel – III norms aim to:
• Improving the banking sector's ability to absorb
shocks arising from financial and economic stress
• Improve risk management and governance
• Strengthen banks' transparency and disclosures
Structure of Basel – III Accord
• Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements based on
Risk Weighted Assets (RWAs) : Maintaining capital
calculated through credit, market and operational risk
areas.
• Supervisory Review Process : Regulating tools and
frameworks for dealing with peripheral risks that banks
face
• Market Discipline : Increasing the disclosures that
banks must provide to increase the transparency of
banks
Major changes in Basel - III
• Better Capital Quality
• Capital Conservation Buffer
• Counter cyclical Buffer
• Minimum Common Equity and Tier I Capital
requirements
• Leverage Ratios
• Liquidity Ratios
• Systematically Important Financial Institutions
BASEL III ACCORD
• The G20 endorsed the new ‘Basel 3’ capital and liquidity
requirements.
• Extension of Basel II with critical additions, such as a leverage
ratio, a macro prudential overview and the liquidity framework.
• Basel III accord provides a substantial strengthening of capital
requirements.
• Basel III will place greater emphasis on loss-absorbency capacity on a
going concern basis
• The proposed changes are to be phased from 2013 to 2015
Basel III-Objectives
• Special emphasis on the Capital Adequacy Ratio
– Capital Adequacy Ratio is calculated as –
CAR = (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) / Risk Weighted
Assets
– Reducing risk spillover to the real economy
• Comprehensive set of reform measures to strengthen the
banking sector.
• Strengthens banks transparency and disclosures.
• Improve the banking sectors ability to absorb shocks arising
from financial and economic stress.
Major features of Basel III
• Revised Minimum Equity & Tier 1 Capital
Requirements
• Better Capital Quality
• Backstop Leverage Ratio
• Short term and long term liquidity funding
• Inclusion of Leverage Ratio & Liquidity Ratios
• Rigorous credit risk management
• Counter Cyclical Buffer
• Capital conservation Buffer
Impact on Pakistani banking system
• Profitability
• Capital acquisition
• Liquidity Needs
• Limits on lending
• Bank consolidation
• Pressure on Yield on Assets
• Pressure on Return on Equity:
• Stability in the Banking system
Conclusion
• One shoe doesn’t fit all.
• Monetary policies of Central Banks in each country
(example RBI’s CRR, SLR, Repo etc.) make it difficult
to uniformly implement BASEL norms
• Exercising controls on the capital, liquidity and
leveraging of banks will ensure that they have the
ability to withstand crises.
Basel iii

Basel iii

  • 2.
    An Overview Of theBASEL iii Presented by: Rana Faisal Ali Wajahat Hussain Muneeb Rana Azhar Sadiq
  • 3.
    Introduction: • Basel isa city in Switzerland which is also the headquarters of Bureau of International Settlement (BIS). • BIS’s common goal:  financial stability  common standards • BIS have 27 member nations in the committee.
  • 4.
    Basel – INorms In 1988, the Basel I Capital Accord was created. The general purpose was to: 1. Strengthen the stability of international banking system. 2. Set up a fair and a consistent international banking system in order to decrease competitive inequality among international banks.
  • 5.
    Limitations of Basel– I Norms • Limited differentiation of credit risk • Static measure of default risk • No recognition of term-structure of credit risk • Simplified calculation of potential future counter party risk • Lack of recognition of portfolio diversification effects
  • 6.
    Basel – IINorms Basel – II norms are based on 3 pillars: • Minimum Capital – Banks must hold capital against 8% of their assets, after adjusting their assets for risk • Supervisory Review – It is the process whereby national regulators ensure their home country banks are following the rules. • Market Discipline – It is based on enhanced disclosure of risk
  • 7.
    Pitfalls of Basel– II norms • Too much regulatory compliance • Over Focusing on Credit Risk • The new Accord is complex and therefore demanding for supervisors, and unsophisticated banks • Strong risk differentiation in the new Accord can adversely affect the borrowing position of risky borrowers
  • 8.
    Advantages of BaselII over I • The discrepancy between economic capital and regulatory capital is reduced significantly, due to that the regulatory requirements will rely on banks’ own risk methods. • More Risk sensitive • Wider recognition of credit risk mitigation.
  • 9.
    Basel – IIINorms Basel – III norms aim to: • Improving the banking sector's ability to absorb shocks arising from financial and economic stress • Improve risk management and governance • Strengthen banks' transparency and disclosures
  • 10.
    Structure of Basel– III Accord • Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements based on Risk Weighted Assets (RWAs) : Maintaining capital calculated through credit, market and operational risk areas. • Supervisory Review Process : Regulating tools and frameworks for dealing with peripheral risks that banks face • Market Discipline : Increasing the disclosures that banks must provide to increase the transparency of banks
  • 11.
    Major changes inBasel - III • Better Capital Quality • Capital Conservation Buffer • Counter cyclical Buffer • Minimum Common Equity and Tier I Capital requirements • Leverage Ratios • Liquidity Ratios • Systematically Important Financial Institutions
  • 12.
    BASEL III ACCORD •The G20 endorsed the new ‘Basel 3’ capital and liquidity requirements. • Extension of Basel II with critical additions, such as a leverage ratio, a macro prudential overview and the liquidity framework. • Basel III accord provides a substantial strengthening of capital requirements. • Basel III will place greater emphasis on loss-absorbency capacity on a going concern basis • The proposed changes are to be phased from 2013 to 2015
  • 13.
    Basel III-Objectives • Specialemphasis on the Capital Adequacy Ratio – Capital Adequacy Ratio is calculated as – CAR = (Tier 1 Capital + Tier 2 Capital) / Risk Weighted Assets – Reducing risk spillover to the real economy • Comprehensive set of reform measures to strengthen the banking sector. • Strengthens banks transparency and disclosures. • Improve the banking sectors ability to absorb shocks arising from financial and economic stress.
  • 14.
    Major features ofBasel III • Revised Minimum Equity & Tier 1 Capital Requirements • Better Capital Quality • Backstop Leverage Ratio • Short term and long term liquidity funding • Inclusion of Leverage Ratio & Liquidity Ratios • Rigorous credit risk management • Counter Cyclical Buffer • Capital conservation Buffer
  • 15.
    Impact on Pakistanibanking system • Profitability • Capital acquisition • Liquidity Needs • Limits on lending • Bank consolidation • Pressure on Yield on Assets • Pressure on Return on Equity: • Stability in the Banking system
  • 16.
    Conclusion • One shoedoesn’t fit all. • Monetary policies of Central Banks in each country (example RBI’s CRR, SLR, Repo etc.) make it difficult to uniformly implement BASEL norms • Exercising controls on the capital, liquidity and leveraging of banks will ensure that they have the ability to withstand crises.