The document summarizes the Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) measures and targets for Georgetown ISD for the 2010-2011 school year. It discusses the measures of reading/ELA and math proficiency and participation that were evaluated for different student groups. It provides an overview of Georgetown ISD's 2011 AYP report, which found the district missed AYP due to reading proficiency and some individual campuses missed for various reasons.
1. Adequate
Yearly
Progress
2010-‐11
Annual Report and Public Hearing
Georgetown ISD
February 16, 2012
2. Measures
Evaluated
• Reading/ELA
– Percent
of
students
(Grades
3-‐8
and
10)
who
are
Proficient
in
Reading/
ELA
– Percent
of
students
(Grades
3-‐8
and
10)
who
Par=cipate
in
Reading/ELA
• Math
– Percent
of
students
(Grades
3-‐8
and
10)
who
are
Proficient
in
Math
– Percent
of
students
(Grades
3-‐8
and
10)
who
Par=cipate
in
Math
• Other
– ABendance
Rate
• For
elementary
and
middle
school
campuses
• Districts
not
offering
12th
grade
– GraduaJon
Rate
• For
high
school
campuses
• Districts
offering
12th
grade
3. Standards
for
Performance
%
Proficient
100
%
93
87
92
of
students
80
83
must
pass
Reading
73
75
in
2014
Math
67
2009-‐10
2010-‐11
2011-‐12
2012-‐13
2013-‐14
4. Student
Groups
Evaluated
Performance
Par=cipa=on
Other
Indicator
Accountability
Subset
All
Students
Enrolled
ABendance
&
GraduaJon
•
All
Students
Group
•
All
Students
Group
•
All
Students
Group
•
African
American*
•
African
American*
•
Hispanic*
•
Hispanic*
•
White*
•
White*
•
Econ.
Disadvantaged*
•
Econ.
Disadvantaged*
•
Special
EducaJon*
•
Special
EducaJon*
•
Limited
English
Proficient*
•
Limited
English
Proficient*
*
Provided
that
these
groups
meet
the
Minimum
Size
Requirement
<
50
=
Not
Evaluated
|
≥
200
=
Always
Evaluated
|
50-‐199
=
Evaluated
if
equal
to
at
least
10%
of
the
All
Student
group
6. 2011
AYP
Report
Overview
Page
One
Performance:
Reading/ELA
(AYP
Target:
80%)
• Reading
Performance,
2010-‐2011
– Used
to
demonstrate
proficiency
• Reading
Performance,
2009-‐2010
– Used
to
calculate
improvement
(Safe
Harbor)
7. 2011
AYP
Report
Overview
Page
Two
Performance:
MathemaJcs
(AYP
Target:
75%)
• Math
Performance,
2010-‐2011
– Used
to
demonstrate
proficiency
• Math
Performance,
2009-‐2010
– Used
to
calculate
improvement
(Safe
Harbor)
8. 2011
AYP
Report
Overview
Page
Three
ParJcipaJon:
Reading/ELA
&
MathemaJcs
(AYP
Target:
95%)
• Reading/ELA
&
Math
ParJcipaJon,
2010-‐2011
– Used
to
demonstrate
par:cipa:on
• Reading/ELA
&
Math
ParJcipaJon,
2009-‐2010
– Used
to
calculate
2
year
average,
if
needed
9. 2011
AYP
Report
Overview
Page
Four
GraduaJon
Rate
(AYP
Target:
75%)
or
ABendance
Rate
(AYP
Target:
90%)
• GraduaJon
Rate
(Class
of
2010)
or
ABendance
Rate
(2009-‐10
School
Year)
– Used
to
calculate
whether
or
not
the
campus
or
district
met
the
target
rate
• GraduaJon
Rate
(Class
of
2009)
or
ABendance
Rate
(2008-‐09
School
Year)
– Used
to
demonstrate
improvement
• 5-‐Year
Longitudinal
GraduaJon
Rate
(Class
of
2009)
– Class
of
2009
10. 2011
AYP
Report
Overview
Page
Five
AYP
ExplanaJon
Table:
• Summarizes
the
results
of
the
AYP
report
• +
Meets
AYP
• – Not
Evaluated
• %
Missed
AYP
due
to
2%
and/or
1%
federal
caps
• X
Missed
AYP