Academic	
  Excellence	
   	
  
   Indicator	
  System 	
  
        2010-­‐11 	
  
Annual	
  Report	
  and	
  Public	
  Hearing	
  
           Georgetown	
  ISD    	
  
            February	
  16,	
  2012	
  
Academic	
  Excellence	
  Indicator	
  System	
  (AEIS)	
  
     Comprehensive	
  repor-ng	
  system	
  defined	
  by	
  statute	
  
     Published	
  annually	
  since	
  1990-­‐91	
  
     Gives	
  parents	
  and	
  community	
  a	
  snapshot	
  of	
  
           District/Campus	
  Performance	
  (Sec-on	
  I	
  of	
  AEIS	
  Report)	
  
           District/Campus	
  Profile	
  (Sec-on	
  II	
  of	
  AEIS	
  Report)	
  
     Contains	
  all	
  data	
  used	
  to	
  determine	
  District/Campus	
  
      accountability	
  ra-ngs	
  
     Uses	
  data	
  collected	
  through:	
  
           State	
  data	
  repor-ng	
  system	
  (PEIMS)	
  
           Student	
  assessment	
  system	
  
AEIS	
  Report	
  
  Cover	
  Page	
  
       District/Campus	
  2010-­‐11	
  
        Accountability	
  Ra-ng	
  
       District	
  PBM	
  Special	
  Educa-on	
  
        Monitoring	
  Results	
  Status	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  	
  
        (if	
  applicable)	
  
       District/Campus	
  Gold	
  
        Performance	
  Acknowledgments	
  
AEIS	
  Report	
  
Overview	
  –	
  Three	
  SecLons	
  
   Sec-on	
  I:	
  	
  District/Campus	
  Performance	
  
       TAKS	
  Performance/Par-cipa-on	
  
           Disaggregated	
  by	
  grade	
  level	
  &	
  student	
  group	
  
       ARendance	
  &	
  Annual	
  Dropout	
  Rate	
  
       Comple-on	
  Rate	
  
       College	
  Readiness	
  Indicators	
  
           Advanced	
  Course/Dual	
  Enrollment	
  Comple-on,	
  RHSP	
  &	
  DAP	
  
            Graduates,	
  AP/IB	
  Results,	
  Texas	
  Success	
  Ini-a-ve	
  -­‐	
  Higher	
  
            Educa-on	
  Readiness	
  Component	
  (HERC),	
  SAT/ACT	
  Results,	
  
            College-­‐Ready	
  Graduates	
  (Class	
  of	
  2010)	
  
AEIS	
  Report	
  
Overview	
  –	
  Three	
  SecLons	
  
      Sec-on	
  II:	
  	
  District/Campus	
  Profile	
  
           Demographic	
  data	
  about	
  students	
  and	
  staff	
  
           Financial	
  informa-on	
  
           Program	
  informa-on	
  
      Sec-on	
  III:	
  	
  Bilingual	
  Educa-on	
  /	
  English	
  as	
  a	
  
       Second	
  Language	
  Report	
  
           TAKS	
  performance	
  data	
  for	
  current	
  year	
  Limited	
  
            English	
  Proficient	
  (LEP)	
  students	
  
AEIS:	
  2011	
  Accountability	
  Standards	
  
                                                                                                  	
  
                                                              Academically	
  
                                                               Acceptable           	
                     Recognized         	
                       Exemplary         	
  
                                                        Meets	
  each	
  standard:	
  
          TAKS	
  (2010-­‐11)	
  
                             	
  
                                                         	
  Reading/ELA……. 	
  70%	
             Meets	
  80%	
  standard	
  
(including	
  TAKS	
  (Acc),	
  TAKS-­‐M,	
  
                                                         	
  Wri-ng…………..          	
  70%	
        for	
  each	
  subject 	
  
&	
  TAKS-­‐Alt)	
  for	
  All	
  Students	
  &	
                                                                                              Meets	
  90%	
  standard	
  
each	
  student	
  group	
  (African	
                   	
  Social	
  Studies…… 	
  70%	
                    OR   	
  
                                                                                                                                                for	
  each	
  subject
                                                                                                                                                                     	
  
American,	
  Hispanic,	
  White,	
                       	
  Mathema-cs……. 	
  65%	
              Meets	
  75%	
  floor	
  and	
  
Economically	
  Disadv.)	
  mee-ng	
                     	
  Science…………..         	
  60%	
     Required	
  Improvement          	
  
minimum	
  size	
  requirements	
                       OR	
  Meets	
  Required	
  Imprv.	
  
  ELL	
  Progress	
  Indicator	
                                                                  60%	
  at	
  or	
  above	
  criteria	
     60%	
  at	
  or	
  above	
  criteria	
  
 (2010-­‐11)	
  TELPAS	
  or	
  TAKS     	
                             N/A	
                       OR	
  Meets	
  Required	
                  OR	
  Meets	
  Required	
  
   All	
  ELL	
  Students	
  ≥	
  30	
                                                                   Improvement           	
                   Improvement           	
  
Commended	
  Performance	
                                                                          Meets	
  15%	
  standard	
                 Meets	
  25%	
  standard	
  
(2010-­‐11)	
  (including	
  all	
  TAKS)	
                             N/A	
                       for	
  Reading/ELA	
  and	
                for	
  Reading/ELA	
  and	
  
if	
  meets	
  minimum	
  size	
  for	
  All	
  
Students	
  &	
  Econ.	
  Disadv.	
                                                                        Mathema-cs    	
                           Mathema-cs    	
  

                                                         Meets	
  75.0%	
  standard	
              Meets	
  85.0%	
  standard	
  
Comple@on	
  Rate	
  I*	
  
                                                          OR	
  Meets	
  Required	
                 OR	
  Meets	
  floor	
  of	
               Meets	
  95.0%	
  standard	
  
(Class	
  of	
  2010)	
  
                                                           Improvement	
  (RI)   	
                       75.0%	
  &	
  RI
                                                                                                                         	
  
Annual	
  Dropout	
  Rate*	
                              Meets	
  1.6%	
  standard	
               Meets	
  1.6%	
  standard	
                Meets	
  1.6%	
  standard	
  
(2009-­‐10)	
                                                OR	
  Meets	
  RI 	
                      OR	
  Meets	
  RI 	
                       OR	
  Meets	
  RI 	
  

  *	
  If	
  meets	
  minimum	
  size:	
  All	
  Students,	
  African	
  American,	
  
  	
  	
  	
  Hispanic,	
  White,	
  Economically	
  Disadvantaged	
  
2011	
  Accountability	
  Results	
  for	
  Georgetown	
  ISD	
  
  Exemplary:	
                                           Academically	
  Acceptable:	
  
      Ford	
  Elementary	
                                          Georgetown	
  High	
  School	
  
                                                                     Richarte	
  High	
  School	
  (AEA)*	
  
  Recognized	
  
        Georgetown	
  ISD	
                                         Benold	
  Middle	
  School	
  
        Georgetown	
  9th	
  Grade	
  (EVHS)	
                      Tippit	
  Middle	
  School	
  
        Cooper	
  Elementary	
                                      Forbes	
  Middle	
  School	
  
        McCoy	
  Elementary	
                                       PickeJ	
  Elementary	
  
        Frost	
  Elementary	
  
                                                                     Carver	
  Elementary	
  
        Village	
  Elementary	
  
        Williams	
  Elementary	
  
        Purl	
  Elementary	
                       *AEA	
  –	
  AlternaLve	
  EducaLon	
  Accountability	
  System	
  	
  	
  
                                                    (The	
  highest	
  raLng	
  allowed	
  is	
  Academically	
  Acceptable.)	
  
        Mitchell	
  Elementary	
  
Percent	
  Met	
  2011	
  TAKS	
  Performance	
  Standard	
  	
  
(Standard	
  Accountability	
  Indicator)	
  
New	
  Base	
  Indicators:	
  
     English	
  Language	
  Learners	
  Progress	
  Indicator:	
  
         81%	
  

     Commended	
  Performance:	
  
                                 Reading/ELA   Mathematics
               All Students         41%           40%
               Econ. Disadv.        27%           25%
CompleLon	
  Rate	
  I	
  

      Comple-on	
  Rate	
  I	
  (HS)	
  
             Grades	
  9-­‐12	
  
                                                                                    Dropped    Graduated
             4-­‐year	
  cohort	
  measure	
                                         Out
             Formula:	
  
                                                                                               Continued
                                                                                    Received
                                                 #	
   rdae +	
  o@ur
                                                 	
  	
  	
  	
  Gauts	
   Cn nes
                                                                      	
                         High
                                                                                      GED
                                                                                                School
#	
  Graduates	
  +	
  Con@nuers	
  +	
  GED	
  +	
  Dropouts
                                                            	
  
CompleLon	
  Rate	
  I	
  
Class	
  of	
  2010	
  (longitudinal	
  data)	
  
CompleLon	
  Rate	
  I	
  (Standard	
  Accountability	
  Indicator)	
  
Class	
  of	
  2010	
  (longitudinal	
  data)	
  
2011	
  Annual	
  Dropout	
  Rate	
  (Grades	
  7-­‐8,	
  2009-­‐10)	
  	
  
(Standard	
  Accountability	
  Indicator)	
  
AddiLonal	
  Indicators:	
  
College	
  Readiness	
  Indicators	
  
      Percent	
  of	
  high	
  school	
  students	
  comple-ng	
  an	
  
       Advanced	
  Course/Dual	
  Enrollment	
  in	
  2009-­‐10:	
  
          24.3	
  
      Percent	
  of	
  2010	
  graduates	
  comple-ng	
  the	
  
       Recommended	
  High	
  School	
  Program	
  or	
  Dis-nguished	
  
       Achievement	
  Program:	
  
          89.8	
  
      Advanced	
  Placement	
  (AP)	
  results	
  for	
  2009-­‐10:	
  
            %	
  Tested:	
  	
  18.3	
  
            %	
  Examinees	
  >=	
  Criterion*:	
  	
  75.2	
  
            %	
  Scores	
  >=	
  Criterion*:	
  	
  66.8	
  
                                                                   *3	
  on	
  AP	
  Exam	
  
Addi-onal	
  Indicators:	
  
SAT/ACT	
  Results	
  for	
  the	
  Class	
  of	
  2010	
  

         Percent Tested:                                        Average SAT Score:
                  All Students: 66.9                         GISD 1055 vs. 985 State Avg.
                  African Amer: 75.0
                  Hispanic: 50.3
                                                                 Average ACT Score:
                  White: 73.6
                                                              GISD 23.0 vs. 20.5 State Avg.
                  Eco. Disadv: N/A

         Percent At/Above Criterion*
                  All Students: 42.3
                  African Amer: 26.7
                  Hispanic: 25.0
                  White: 48.6
                  Eco. Disadv: N/A
                                                                *1110 on the SAT, or 24 on the ACT
AddiLonal	
  Indicators:	
  Texas	
  Success	
  IniLaLve	
  (TSI)	
  
Percent	
  of	
  11th	
  Graders	
  MeeLng	
  the	
  Higher	
  EducaLon	
  Readiness	
  Component	
  




   ELA: Scale Score ≥ 2200 & Score 3 or Higher on Essay             Math: Scale Score ≥ 2200
AddiLonal	
  Indicators:	
  2010	
  College-­‐Ready	
  Graduates	
  
AEIS	
  Report	
  
	
  SecLon	
  II	
  -­‐	
  Profile	
  
     Student	
  Informa-on	
                  Staff	
  Informa-on	
  
         Enrollment data by grade level           Type of staff
         Ethnic distribution                      Educational & experience level
         Other demographic statistics             Salary data
         Graduate information                     Turnover rate for teachers
         Retention rates
         Average class size information       Financial	
  Informa-on	
  
                                                   Tax information
                                                   Revenues
                                                   Expenditures

                                               Program	
  Informa-on	
  
                                                   Student enrollment
                                                   Teachers by program
SecLon	
  III:	
  Bilingual	
  EducaLon/English	
  as	
  a	
  Second	
  Language	
  Report	
  	
  
2010-­‐11	
  District	
  Performance	
  Report	
  for	
  Current	
  LEP	
  Students	
  
                         TAKS	
  Met	
  2011	
  Standard	
  (Sum	
  of	
  All	
  Grades	
  Tested)
                                                                                                 	
  
                         District	
  –	
  All	
                                                             LEP	
  –	
  No	
  
 Indicator:	
              Students       	
             Bilingual
                                                                 	
                     ESL
                                                                                          	
                 Services     	
  
 Reading/ELA	
                  93%	
                        79%	
                      64%	
                    87%	
  

 Mathema-cs	
                   90%	
                        82%	
                      66%	
                    88%	
  

 Wri-ng	
                       93%	
                        92%	
                      65%	
                    86%	
  

 Science	
                      87%	
                        71%	
                      38%	
                    33%	
  

 Social	
  Studies	
            97%	
                 No	
  Bilingual	
                 86%	
            Fewer	
  Than	
  5	
  
                                                    Students	
  Tested    	
                            Students	
  Tested      	
  
 All	
  Tests	
                 83%	
                        67%	
                      42%	
                    74%	
  
Campus	
  Performance	
  ObjecLves	
  
     Campus	
  Improvement	
  Plans	
  are	
  based	
  on	
  the	
  AEIS	
  data.	
  

     Performance	
  Objec-ves	
  are	
  approved	
  by	
  the	
  Board	
  of	
  
      Trustees.	
  

     Data	
  from	
  the	
  AEIS	
  gives	
  direc-on	
  for	
  the	
  development	
  of	
  
      performance	
  objec-ves	
  that	
  are	
  low	
  in	
  rela-on	
  to	
  the	
  
      accountability	
  standards.	
  
Violent	
  and	
  Criminal	
  Incidents	
  
   Texas	
  statute	
  (TEC	
  39.053)	
  requires	
  every	
  district	
  to	
  publish	
  an	
  annual	
  
    report	
  on	
  violent	
  and	
  criminal	
  incidents	
  at	
  campuses	
  in	
  the	
  district	
  

   The	
  report	
  must	
  include:	
  
         Number, rate, and type of incidents
         Information concerning school violence prevention and intervention
          policies and procedures used by the district
         Findings that result from evaluations conducted under the Safe and
          Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act
Violent	
  and	
  Criminal	
  Incidents	
  for	
  2010-­‐11	
  
             Type                 #     Rate                     Type                    #    Rate
  Controlled Substances           8    0.08%       Alcohol Offenses                      4    0.04%
  (including felony violations)

  Criminal Mischief               1    0.01%       Weapons Violation                     11   0.11%
  Arson                           0      0%        Assault (on employee/volunteer)       5    0.05%
  Retaliation                     1    0.01%       Assault (not on employee/volunteer)   7    0.07%
  Cigarette/Tobacco               6    0.06%       Fighting/Mutual Combat                4    0.04%
  Terroristic Threat &            1    0.01%       Public Lewdness & Indecent            4    0.04%
  False Report                                     Exposure
  Conduct Punishable as           1    0.01%       Other*                                0      0%
  a Felony
 *Other: Other felonies (e.g., felony theft), school-related gang violence, gang-related activity, indecency
 with a child, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, aggravated assault, sexual assault,
 manslaughter, negligent homicide, deadly conduct, and murder

 Sources: PEIMS Edit+ Student Disciplinary Action Summary, 2010-11 Summer;
 GISD Total Enrollment as of Fall 2010-11 PEIMS Resubmission
Student	
  Enrollment	
  and	
  Academic	
  Performance	
  	
  
     (Texas	
  Higher	
  EducaLon	
  CoordinaLng	
  Board	
  –	
  Required	
  Report)
                                                                                    	
  
      Data	
  collected	
  and	
  reported	
  by	
  the	
  THECB	
  in	
  an	
  annual	
  report:	
  	
  
  	
  Report	
  of	
  2008-­‐2009	
  High	
  School	
  Graduates’	
  Enrollment	
  and	
  Academic	
  Performance	
  in	
  Texas	
  
                                            Public	
  Higher	
  EducaLon	
  in	
  Fiscal	
  Year	
  2010   	
  
  Reports	
  on	
  student	
  performance	
  in	
  postsecondary	
  ins-tu-ons	
  during	
  the	
  first	
  year	
  enrolled	
  
       aner	
  gradua-on	
  from	
  high	
  school	
  

                                                                    GPA for 1st Year in Public Higher Education in Texas
                                                    Total
       District: Georgetown ISD                   Graduates   < 2.0        2.0 – 2.49      2.5 – 2.99      3.0 – 3.49        > 3.5        Unknown

       Four-Year Public University: GHS             166        26              28             35              49              28              0
       Four-Year Public University: RHS              3          *               *              *               *               *              *
       Two-Year Public Colleges: GHS & RHS          145        29              30             22              24              29             11
       Independent Colleges & Universities: GHS      39
       Not Trackable: GHS                            12
       Not Found: GHS & RHS                         240
       Total High School Graduates in GISD          605

      GHS:	
  Georgetown	
  High	
  School	
                        *If	
  enrollment	
  in	
  public	
  higher	
  educaLon	
  is	
  less	
  than	
  25,	
  
      RHS:	
  Richarte	
  High	
  School	
                          the	
  GPA	
  data	
  is	
  omifed.	
  
Accessing	
  the	
  AEIS	
  Report	
  
  Where	
  the	
  report	
  is	
  available:	
  
       TEA: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2011/index.html

       GISD website: http://www.georgetownisd.org/Domain/146

       Campus libraries or offices (available within 2 weeks of public hearing)

       Central administration building (available within 2 weeks of public
        hearing)

      Contact	
  InformaLon	
  
     Becky	
  McCoy,	
  GISD	
  
     Assessment	
  Director    	
  
  (512)	
  943-­‐5000,	
  ext.	
  6034	
  
mccoyr@georgetownisd.org	
                   • 	
  AEIS	
  Reports	
  
                                             (coming	
  soon)    	
  

AEIS Report Presentation

  • 1.
    Academic  Excellence     Indicator  System   2010-­‐11   Annual  Report  and  Public  Hearing   Georgetown  ISD   February  16,  2012  
  • 2.
    Academic  Excellence  Indicator  System  (AEIS)     Comprehensive  repor-ng  system  defined  by  statute     Published  annually  since  1990-­‐91     Gives  parents  and  community  a  snapshot  of     District/Campus  Performance  (Sec-on  I  of  AEIS  Report)     District/Campus  Profile  (Sec-on  II  of  AEIS  Report)     Contains  all  data  used  to  determine  District/Campus   accountability  ra-ngs     Uses  data  collected  through:     State  data  repor-ng  system  (PEIMS)     Student  assessment  system  
  • 3.
    AEIS  Report    Cover  Page     District/Campus  2010-­‐11   Accountability  Ra-ng     District  PBM  Special  Educa-on   Monitoring  Results  Status                   (if  applicable)     District/Campus  Gold   Performance  Acknowledgments  
  • 4.
    AEIS  Report   Overview  –  Three  SecLons     Sec-on  I:    District/Campus  Performance     TAKS  Performance/Par-cipa-on     Disaggregated  by  grade  level  &  student  group     ARendance  &  Annual  Dropout  Rate     Comple-on  Rate     College  Readiness  Indicators     Advanced  Course/Dual  Enrollment  Comple-on,  RHSP  &  DAP   Graduates,  AP/IB  Results,  Texas  Success  Ini-a-ve  -­‐  Higher   Educa-on  Readiness  Component  (HERC),  SAT/ACT  Results,   College-­‐Ready  Graduates  (Class  of  2010)  
  • 5.
    AEIS  Report   Overview  –  Three  SecLons     Sec-on  II:    District/Campus  Profile     Demographic  data  about  students  and  staff     Financial  informa-on     Program  informa-on     Sec-on  III:    Bilingual  Educa-on  /  English  as  a   Second  Language  Report     TAKS  performance  data  for  current  year  Limited   English  Proficient  (LEP)  students  
  • 6.
    AEIS:  2011  Accountability  Standards     Academically   Acceptable   Recognized   Exemplary   Meets  each  standard:   TAKS  (2010-­‐11)        Reading/ELA…….  70%   Meets  80%  standard   (including  TAKS  (Acc),  TAKS-­‐M,      Wri-ng…………..  70%   for  each  subject   &  TAKS-­‐Alt)  for  All  Students  &   Meets  90%  standard   each  student  group  (African      Social  Studies……  70%   OR   for  each  subject   American,  Hispanic,  White,      Mathema-cs…….  65%   Meets  75%  floor  and   Economically  Disadv.)  mee-ng      Science…………..  60%   Required  Improvement   minimum  size  requirements   OR  Meets  Required  Imprv.   ELL  Progress  Indicator   60%  at  or  above  criteria   60%  at  or  above  criteria   (2010-­‐11)  TELPAS  or  TAKS   N/A   OR  Meets  Required   OR  Meets  Required   All  ELL  Students  ≥  30   Improvement   Improvement   Commended  Performance   Meets  15%  standard   Meets  25%  standard   (2010-­‐11)  (including  all  TAKS)   N/A   for  Reading/ELA  and   for  Reading/ELA  and   if  meets  minimum  size  for  All   Students  &  Econ.  Disadv.   Mathema-cs   Mathema-cs   Meets  75.0%  standard   Meets  85.0%  standard   Comple@on  Rate  I*   OR  Meets  Required   OR  Meets  floor  of   Meets  95.0%  standard   (Class  of  2010)   Improvement  (RI)   75.0%  &  RI   Annual  Dropout  Rate*   Meets  1.6%  standard   Meets  1.6%  standard   Meets  1.6%  standard   (2009-­‐10)   OR  Meets  RI   OR  Meets  RI   OR  Meets  RI   *  If  meets  minimum  size:  All  Students,  African  American,        Hispanic,  White,  Economically  Disadvantaged  
  • 7.
    2011  Accountability  Results  for  Georgetown  ISD     Exemplary:     Academically  Acceptable:     Ford  Elementary     Georgetown  High  School     Richarte  High  School  (AEA)*     Recognized     Georgetown  ISD     Benold  Middle  School     Georgetown  9th  Grade  (EVHS)     Tippit  Middle  School     Cooper  Elementary     Forbes  Middle  School     McCoy  Elementary     PickeJ  Elementary     Frost  Elementary     Carver  Elementary     Village  Elementary     Williams  Elementary     Purl  Elementary   *AEA  –  AlternaLve  EducaLon  Accountability  System       (The  highest  raLng  allowed  is  Academically  Acceptable.)     Mitchell  Elementary  
  • 8.
    Percent  Met  2011  TAKS  Performance  Standard     (Standard  Accountability  Indicator)  
  • 9.
    New  Base  Indicators:     English  Language  Learners  Progress  Indicator:     81%     Commended  Performance:   Reading/ELA Mathematics All Students 41% 40% Econ. Disadv. 27% 25%
  • 10.
    CompleLon  Rate  I   Comple-on  Rate  I  (HS)     Grades  9-­‐12   Dropped Graduated   4-­‐year  cohort  measure   Out   Formula:   Continued Received #   rdae +  o@ur        Gauts   Cn nes   High GED School #  Graduates  +  Con@nuers  +  GED  +  Dropouts  
  • 11.
    CompleLon  Rate  I   Class  of  2010  (longitudinal  data)  
  • 12.
    CompleLon  Rate  I  (Standard  Accountability  Indicator)   Class  of  2010  (longitudinal  data)  
  • 13.
    2011  Annual  Dropout  Rate  (Grades  7-­‐8,  2009-­‐10)     (Standard  Accountability  Indicator)  
  • 14.
    AddiLonal  Indicators:   College  Readiness  Indicators     Percent  of  high  school  students  comple-ng  an   Advanced  Course/Dual  Enrollment  in  2009-­‐10:     24.3     Percent  of  2010  graduates  comple-ng  the   Recommended  High  School  Program  or  Dis-nguished   Achievement  Program:     89.8     Advanced  Placement  (AP)  results  for  2009-­‐10:     %  Tested:    18.3     %  Examinees  >=  Criterion*:    75.2     %  Scores  >=  Criterion*:    66.8   *3  on  AP  Exam  
  • 15.
    Addi-onal  Indicators:   SAT/ACT  Results  for  the  Class  of  2010     Percent Tested:   Average SAT Score:   All Students: 66.9 GISD 1055 vs. 985 State Avg.   African Amer: 75.0   Hispanic: 50.3   Average ACT Score:   White: 73.6 GISD 23.0 vs. 20.5 State Avg.   Eco. Disadv: N/A   Percent At/Above Criterion*   All Students: 42.3   African Amer: 26.7   Hispanic: 25.0   White: 48.6   Eco. Disadv: N/A *1110 on the SAT, or 24 on the ACT
  • 16.
    AddiLonal  Indicators:  Texas  Success  IniLaLve  (TSI)   Percent  of  11th  Graders  MeeLng  the  Higher  EducaLon  Readiness  Component   ELA: Scale Score ≥ 2200 & Score 3 or Higher on Essay Math: Scale Score ≥ 2200
  • 17.
    AddiLonal  Indicators:  2010  College-­‐Ready  Graduates  
  • 18.
    AEIS  Report    SecLon  II  -­‐  Profile     Student  Informa-on     Staff  Informa-on     Enrollment data by grade level   Type of staff   Ethnic distribution   Educational & experience level   Other demographic statistics   Salary data   Graduate information   Turnover rate for teachers   Retention rates   Average class size information   Financial  Informa-on     Tax information   Revenues   Expenditures   Program  Informa-on     Student enrollment   Teachers by program
  • 19.
    SecLon  III:  Bilingual  EducaLon/English  as  a  Second  Language  Report     2010-­‐11  District  Performance  Report  for  Current  LEP  Students   TAKS  Met  2011  Standard  (Sum  of  All  Grades  Tested)   District  –  All   LEP  –  No   Indicator:   Students   Bilingual   ESL   Services   Reading/ELA   93%   79%   64%   87%   Mathema-cs   90%   82%   66%   88%   Wri-ng   93%   92%   65%   86%   Science   87%   71%   38%   33%   Social  Studies   97%   No  Bilingual   86%   Fewer  Than  5   Students  Tested   Students  Tested   All  Tests   83%   67%   42%   74%  
  • 20.
    Campus  Performance  ObjecLves     Campus  Improvement  Plans  are  based  on  the  AEIS  data.     Performance  Objec-ves  are  approved  by  the  Board  of   Trustees.     Data  from  the  AEIS  gives  direc-on  for  the  development  of   performance  objec-ves  that  are  low  in  rela-on  to  the   accountability  standards.  
  • 21.
    Violent  and  Criminal  Incidents     Texas  statute  (TEC  39.053)  requires  every  district  to  publish  an  annual   report  on  violent  and  criminal  incidents  at  campuses  in  the  district     The  report  must  include:     Number, rate, and type of incidents   Information concerning school violence prevention and intervention policies and procedures used by the district   Findings that result from evaluations conducted under the Safe and Drug-Free Schools and Communities Act
  • 22.
    Violent  and  Criminal  Incidents  for  2010-­‐11   Type # Rate Type # Rate Controlled Substances 8 0.08% Alcohol Offenses 4 0.04% (including felony violations) Criminal Mischief 1 0.01% Weapons Violation 11 0.11% Arson 0 0% Assault (on employee/volunteer) 5 0.05% Retaliation 1 0.01% Assault (not on employee/volunteer) 7 0.07% Cigarette/Tobacco 6 0.06% Fighting/Mutual Combat 4 0.04% Terroristic Threat & 1 0.01% Public Lewdness & Indecent 4 0.04% False Report Exposure Conduct Punishable as 1 0.01% Other* 0 0% a Felony *Other: Other felonies (e.g., felony theft), school-related gang violence, gang-related activity, indecency with a child, aggravated kidnapping, aggravated robbery, aggravated assault, sexual assault, manslaughter, negligent homicide, deadly conduct, and murder Sources: PEIMS Edit+ Student Disciplinary Action Summary, 2010-11 Summer; GISD Total Enrollment as of Fall 2010-11 PEIMS Resubmission
  • 23.
    Student  Enrollment  and  Academic  Performance     (Texas  Higher  EducaLon  CoordinaLng  Board  –  Required  Report)     Data  collected  and  reported  by  the  THECB  in  an  annual  report:      Report  of  2008-­‐2009  High  School  Graduates’  Enrollment  and  Academic  Performance  in  Texas   Public  Higher  EducaLon  in  Fiscal  Year  2010     Reports  on  student  performance  in  postsecondary  ins-tu-ons  during  the  first  year  enrolled   aner  gradua-on  from  high  school   GPA for 1st Year in Public Higher Education in Texas Total District: Georgetown ISD Graduates < 2.0 2.0 – 2.49 2.5 – 2.99 3.0 – 3.49 > 3.5 Unknown Four-Year Public University: GHS 166 26 28 35 49 28 0 Four-Year Public University: RHS 3 * * * * * * Two-Year Public Colleges: GHS & RHS 145 29 30 22 24 29 11 Independent Colleges & Universities: GHS 39 Not Trackable: GHS 12 Not Found: GHS & RHS 240 Total High School Graduates in GISD 605 GHS:  Georgetown  High  School   *If  enrollment  in  public  higher  educaLon  is  less  than  25,   RHS:  Richarte  High  School   the  GPA  data  is  omifed.  
  • 24.
    Accessing  the  AEIS  Report     Where  the  report  is  available:     TEA: http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/aeis/2011/index.html   GISD website: http://www.georgetownisd.org/Domain/146   Campus libraries or offices (available within 2 weeks of public hearing)   Central administration building (available within 2 weeks of public hearing) Contact  InformaLon   Becky  McCoy,  GISD   Assessment  Director   (512)  943-­‐5000,  ext.  6034   mccoyr@georgetownisd.org   •   AEIS  Reports   (coming  soon)