2. CONTENT
➤ Evaluation of articulator and occlusal concept
➤ Articulator type
➤ Mandibular closure and opening in CR
➤ Facebow transfer
➤ Mounting cast in CR
➤ Mounting in MIP
➤ Condylar guidance
➤ Bennett angle
➤ Setting of condylar guidance
➤ Condylar guidance duplication
➤ Clinical consideration
➤ Border of movement 2
16. ➤ Relation of maxillary cast to horizontal reference planes
FACEBOW TRANSFER
“Interpupillary line”
16
17. FACEBOW TRANSFER
Non parallelism between interpupillary line and intercondylar axis
The relation to the intercondylar axis is more
mount the upper cast parallel to the upper member of
articulator
Esthetic orientation is more important!
mount the cast with esthetics occlusal
plane arbitrarily related to the horizon
17
19. ➤ Is the facebow necessary at all?
FACEBOW TRANSFER
- no evidence of better
clinical result of using
- high long term success
Changing the VD on a
misaligned horizontal axis
Error in closing arc and
cuspal discrepancies
In Scandinavia
- Mean value setting
- The upper cast mounts with
occlusal plane parallel to the
upper member
19
20. ➤ Interocclusal records
Bimanual Chin point
MOUNTING CAST IN CR
Median variability
- Swallowing or free-closure records is 0.4 mm
- Chin point guidance is 0.14 mm
- Chin point with ant jig is 0.07 mm
- Bilateral manipulation is 0.05 mm 20
22. ➤Gothic arch
➤Tin foil wafer with Zn oxide, and eugenol and
compound
➤Light cure acrylic wafer
➤Anterior frontal jig in compound
➤Unrefined wax registration (pink wax)
➤Refined wax registration (pink wax plus Zn
oxide eugenol and aluwax)
MOUNTING CAST IN CR
Effect of recording material on mounting CR
22
23. Unrefined wax wafer
Light cure
Acrylic wafer
CBP, frontal jig,
tin foil,
refined wax wafer
>>
Effect of recording material on mounting CR
MOUNTING CAST IN CR
Vertical accuracy
23
24. Discrepancy : PVS and self cure acrylic less than 0.05 mm
Vertical accuracy
Polyether Wax Compound Acrylic resin> >>
Effect of recording material on mounting CR
MOUNTING CAST IN CR
24
25. Influence of different material
is smaller than
clinical reproducibility of the method
MOUNTING CAST IN CR
25
26. MOUNTING IN MIP
The best is
“no” media
Metal master cast
- PVS 101 micron
- Polyether 107 micron
- Wax 168 micron
Epoxy cast
- 0.5 mm for all materials
Clinical indifference
1
2 If media is used
Vertical discrepancy
26
27. “mean angle made by the protrusive path of movement
relative to the horizontal for a particular degree of protrusion”
CONDYLAR GUIDANCE
Condylar guidance angle
27
28. Non working WorkingProtrusion
Protrusive
interocclusal record
Lateral
interocclusal record
Pantographic tracing or
dynamic registration
CONDYLAR GUIDANCE
➤ Protrusive and non working condylar guidance
28
29. Fischer angle : 6 degrees
Protrusion
Non working
Non working
Protrusion
CONDYLAR GUIDANCE
➤ Protrusive and non working condylar guidance
29
32. ➤ Usually 30-40 degrees
➤ Vary from 21-64 degrees
➤ Class I 58 degrees
➤ Class II 61 degrees
➤ Class III 47 degrees
Skeletal relationship
SETTING OF CONDYLAR GUIDANCE
32
33. Denar Cadiax Compact : electronics
high degree of repeatability
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CTwvI9B6Ksk 33
SETTING OF CONDYLAR GUIDANCE
Pantographic tracing