The document summarizes a capstone design project for an arctic hydrographic research vessel called RV Anaris. The vessel is designed to perform hydrographic surveys, seismic surveys, and support research in the Canadian arctic region. Key requirements include icebreaking capabilities, accommodations for 44 crew and scientists, and endurance of 60 days. The design process involved developing preliminary hull lines and ensuring the vessel meets various regulatory requirements and classification standards. Stability, damaged stability, and resistance analyses were also performed to verify the design.

1. CAPSTONE DESIGN PROJECT
ARCTIC HYDROGRAPHIC RESEARCH VESSEL
RV ANARIS
UBC NAVAL ARCHITECTURE AND MARINE
ENGINEERING
TEAM MEMBERS:
KEVIN RAHARDJO
LUIS ACHURRA
YASIN HRIDOY
ZE WANG
1

2. Project Introduction
 Capstone design project of a hydrographic
research ship capable of integrated research
mainly in the arctic areas from shallow coastal bays
and estuaries out to continental shelf and open
ocean waters of the northern region of the world.
2

3. Missions of the Vessel
 Hydrographic surveying and chartings of the arctic
sea bed with the assistance of autonomous
underwater vehicle (AUVs)
 Seismic surveying of the seabed and the underlying
geology
 Researchers training capabilities
3

4. Concept of Operations
 The vessel shall be
designed to perform a
complete hydrographic
study or the northern
arctic passage in the
Canadian region.
 The vessel’s home port
would be in St. John, New
Brunswick, Canada
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Northeast_Passage#/media/File:Map_of_the_Arctic_region_showing_the_Northeas
t_Passage,_the_Northern_Sea_Route_and_Northwest_Passage,_and_bathymetry.png
4

5. Concept of Operations (contd.)
 The main hydrographic
mission of the vessel will
only allow for the vessel to
operate in the most arctic
regions through a yearly
window based on an arctic
zone designated system,
and artic class vessel type.
http://www.ccg-gcc.gc.ca/Icebreaking/Ice-Navigation-Canadian-Waters/Regulations-and-Guidelines
5

6. Concept of Operations (contd.)
 Usage of drones (AUVs)
and sensors onboard
will increase the
coverage areas the
vessel and maximize
window of operations
http://www.mh370.gov.my/index.php/zh-cn/mh370/mh370
6

7. Preliminary Analysis
http://www.gandoza.com/review/product/list/id/60/
7

8. Vessel/Customer Requirements
 Hydrographic research vessel with ice-breaking
capabilities
 Regulation and standards compliance:
 ABS (Vessel Classification)
 SOLAS (Safety of Life at Sea)
 MARPOL (pollution prevention)
 IMO (Stability)
 GMDSS (emergency communications)
 STCW (operations)
 CASPPR (Canadian arctic pollution prevention)
 Arctic Canada Traffic System (NORDREG)
 Regional Ice Operations Superintendent
 IHO (Hydrographic mission)
 North Canadian Shipping Control Zones, Gulf
of Alaska and the Bering, Chukchi and Beaufort
Seas.
 Endurance of 60 days
 Crew (including scientists) of 44 people
 Mission equipment of 100 long tons
http://www.expressen.se/nyheter/nya-high-techjakten-ska-losa-gatan-mh370/
http://www.imo.org/Pages/home.aspx
http://ww2.eagle.org/content/eagle/en.html
8

9. Vessel/Customer Requirements (contd.)
 Class Society – ABS
 Polar Class and Arctic
Configurations
 CAC – Arctic Shipping
Pollution Regs. (C.R.C.,
c.353)
http://www.uscg.mil/history/webcutters/Icebreaker_Photo_Index.asp
http://www.pcdesktopwallpaper.com/wallpapers-ships/Icebreaker-016.jpg.html
9

10. Category
Arctic Class
10
Arctic Class
8
Arctic Class
7
Arctic Class
6
Arctic Class
4
Type A Type B
Zone 1 All Year
July 1 to Oct.
15
Aug. 1 to Sept.
30
Aug. 15 to Sept.
15
Aug. 15 to Sept.
15
No Entry No Entry
Zone 2 All Year All Year
Aug. 1 to Nov.
30
Aug. 1 to Oct.
31
Aug. 15 to Oct.
15
No Entry No Entry
Zone 3 All Year All Year
July 1 to Dec.
31
July 15 to Nov.
30
July 15 to Oct.
31
Aug. 20 to Sept.
10
Aug. 20 to Sept.
5
Zone 4 All Year All Year
July 1 to Dec.
15
July 15 to Nov.
30
July 15 to Nov.
15
Aug. 20 to Sept.
20
Aug. 20 to Sept.
15
Zone 5 All Year All Year
July 1 to Dec.
15
Aug. 1 to Oct.
15
Aug. 15 to Sept.
30
No Entry No Entry
Zone 6 All Year All Year All Year
July 15 to Feb.
28
July 20 to Dec.
31
Aug. 15 to Oct.
15
Aug. 25 to Sept.
30
Zone 7 All Year All Year All Year
July 1 to Mar.
31
July 15 to Jan.
15
Aug. 1 to Oct.
25
Aug. 10 to Oct.
15
Zone 8 All Year All Year All Year
July 1 to Mar.
31
July 15 to Jan.
15
Aug. 1 to Nov.
10
Aug. 10 to Oct.
31
Zone 9 All Year All Year All Year All Year
July 10 to Mar.
31
Aug. 1 to Nov.
20
Aug. 10 to Oct.
31
Zone 10 All Year All Year All Year All Year
July 10 to Feb.
28
July 25 to Nov.
20
Aug. 1 to Oct.
31
Zone 11 All Year All Year All Year
July 1 to Mar.
31
July 5 to Jan.
15
July 10 to Oct.
31
July 15 to Oct.
20
Zone 12 All Year All Year All Year All Year
June 1 to Jan.
31
June 15 to Nov.
10
July 1 to Oct.
25
Zone 13 All Year All Year All Year All Year
June 1 to Feb.
15
June 25 to Oct.
22
July 15 to Oct.
15
Zone 14 All Year All Year All Year All Year
June 15 to Feb.
15
June 25 to Nov.
30
July 1 to Nov.
30
Zone 15 All Year All Year All Year All Year
June 15 to Mar.
15
June 25 to Dec.
5
July 1 to Nov.
30
Zone 16 All Year All Year All Year All Year
June 1 to Feb.
15
June 20 to Nov.
20
June 20 to Nov.
10
 Polar Classing (season of operations)
 Type A – August 20 to Sept. 10
 Artic Class 4 – August 15 to Sept. 15
 Artic Class 6 – August 15 to Sept. 15
 Artic Class 7 – August 1 to Sept. 30
http://www.ccg-gcc.gc.ca/Icebreaking/Ice-Navigation-Canadian-Waters/Regulations-and-Guidelines
10

11. Hull Form & Lines Plan11
http://www.polycad.co.uk/examples/intellihull/create_intellihull.htm

12. Hull Form Development
USCGC Healy RV Sikuliaq CCGS Amundsen
http://www.lsp123.com/
http://news.uaf.edu/research-vessel-sikuliaq-arriving-alaska/
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CCGS_Amundsen
12

13. Hull Form Development (contd.)
13

14. Vessel Particulars
 LOA: 83.8 m
 LWL: 74.9 m
 LBP: 79.4 m
 Beam Hull: 18.1 m
 Beam WL: 17.7 m
 Depth: 10 m
 Draft: 5.7 m
 Gross Tonnage: 1,388 GT
 Max Speed: 14 knots
 Surveying Speed: 9 knots
 Displacement: 4,888 LT
 LWL/LBP: 0.94
 LWL/BWL: 4.22
 BWL/Draft : 3.11
 CB: 0.63
 CW: 0.87
 AM: 90
 CP: 0.71
 The preliminary particulars of the Hydrographic Research Vessel are as
follows:
 Additional Features:
 Scientific Labs: 166 sqr. meters
 Drone Hangars: 207 sqr. meters
 Scientists Cabins (2 beds per cabin): 12
 Crew Cabins (1 bed per cabin + 1 extra): 14
 Chiefs/Officers/Captain Cabins: 7
14

15. Lines Plan (Sheer Plan)
15

16. Lines Plan (contd.) (Body Plan)
16

17. Lines Plan (contd.) (Half Breadth Plan)
17

18. RV ANARIS
18

19. Stability
（http://www.ship-projects.com/basement.asp?sn=&sez=5&area=1&lang=it&nome=Projects&lay=articolo#!prettyPhoto）
19

20. Intact Stability (Criteria)
Criteria Description (IMO A.749 and Weather Criterion)
1 Area Under GZ curve up to 30 degrees > 3.151 mdeg
2 Area under GZ curve up to 40 degrees > 5.157 mdeg
3 Area under GZ curve from 30 to 40 degrees > 1.719 mdeg
4
Max GZ at an angle of 30 degree or greater and shall not be less than
0.2m
5 Angle of maximum GZ shall not be less than 25 degrees
6 Initial GMt shall not be less than 0.15m
7 Severe wind and rolling criteria
20

21. Intact Stability (contd.) (Results)
Criteria
Case
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Lightship PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Departure with full stores and supplies PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
Arrival with 10% stores and supplies PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
In Transit with 40% stores and supplies PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
In Transit with 50% stores and supplies PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
In Transit with 80% stores and supplies PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS PASS
21

22. Intact Stability (contd.) (Limiting KG Diagram)
22

23. Damaged Stability (Criteria)
Criteria Decription (IMO A534)
1 Value of GZ at spec. shall be greater than 0.1m
2 Angle of equillibrium should be less than 7 deg
3 Range of positive stability shall be greater than 20 deg
# Damage Assumptions
1 Longitudinal extent: 1/3L^(2/3) or 14.5m, whichever is less - 4.873m
2 Transverse extent: B/5 or 11.5m, whichever is less - 3.5484m
3 Vertical extent: Without limit
Type Permeability Assumptions
Stores 0.60
Acc. 0.95
Mach. 0.85
Voids 0.95
23

24. Damaged Stability (contd.) (Bulkheads Placements)
 Transverse watertight bulkheads are denoted by the
red lines:
24
View from the 02-platform

25. Damaged Stability (contd.) (Damaged Cases)
25
Damaged Case Affected Compartments
1
FP Ballast Tank, Stores Receiving Room,
Engineering Stores, Transreceiver Room,Void
1
2
Void 2P, Void 2S, Fresh Water Tank S, Fresh
Water Tank P, MSD Room, Fan Room, Refrig.
Machy, Engineering Stores, stores Receiving
Room, Transreceiver Room
3
Main Machinery Room, Ballast Tank 2P,
Ballast Tank 2S, Ballast Tank 3P, Ballast Tank
3S, Aux. Machy Room, Engineer's Control
Room, Electrical Room
4
Ballast Tank 5S, Ballast Tank 5P, Ballast Tank
6S, Ballast Tank 6P, Bosun's Workshop,
Bosun's Stores, Drone's Stores
5 Motor Room
6 Thruster Room

26. Damaged Stability (contd.) (Result)
Criteria
Case Damage Case 1 2 3
Lightship
DC01 PASS PASS PASS
DC02 PASS PASS PASS
DC03 PASS PASS PASS
DC04 PASS PASS PASS
DC05 PASS PASS PASS
DC06 PASS PASS PASS
Departure
with full
stores and
supplies
DC01 PASS PASS PASS
DC02 PASS PASS PASS
DC03 PASS PASS PASS
DC04 PASS PASS PASS
DC05 PASS PASS PASS
DC06 PASS PASS PASS
Arrival with
10% stores
and supplies
DC01 PASS PASS PASS
DC02 PASS PASS PASS
DC03 PASS PASS PASS
DC04 PASS PASS PASS
DC05 PASS PASS PASS
DC06 PASS PASS PASS
Criteria
Case Damage Case 1 2 3
In Transit
with 40%
stores and
supplies
DC01 PASS PASS PASS
DC02 PASS PASS PASS
DC03 PASS PASS PASS
DC04 PASS PASS PASS
DC05 PASS PASS PASS
DC06 PASS PASS PASS
In Transit
with 50%
stores and
supplies
DC01 PASS PASS PASS
DC02 PASS PASS PASS
DC03 PASS PASS PASS
DC04 PASS PASS PASS
DC05 PASS PASS PASS
DC06 PASS PASS PASS
In Transit
with 80%
stores and
supplies
DC01 PASS PASS PASS
DC02 PASS PASS PASS
DC03 PASS PASS PASS
DC04 PASS PASS PASS
DC05 PASS PASS PASS
DC06 PASS PASS PASS
26

27. Damaged Stability (contd.) (Limiting KG Diagram)
27

28. Resistance28
http://www.hullvane.com/tech-talk/

29. Resistance
 Challenges:
 Lack of resistance design series
 Model testing is infeasible
 Solution:
 Holtrop’s method (1982) + Worm curve factor
acquired from the resistance analysis of USCGC Healy
29

30. Resistance (contd.)
𝑊𝐶𝐹 𝐹𝑛 =
𝑅𝑟 𝐹𝑛 𝑀𝑜𝑑𝑒𝑙 𝑡𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑦
𝑅𝑟(𝐹𝑛) 𝐻𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑟𝑜𝑝 𝐻𝑒𝑎𝑙𝑦
30

31. Resistance (contd.)
y = 14.56x3 - 72.81x2 + 130.37x
R² = 0.9947
-5.00E+02
0.00E+00
5.00E+02
1.00E+03
1.50E+03
2.00E+03
2.50E+03
3.00E+03
3.50E+03
4.00E+03
4.50E+03
0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0
Power(kW)
Speed (m/s)
POWER VS SPEED PLOT
Results
Speed（Knots） Resistance（kN） EHP（kW）
Open Water 14 333 2400
Ice 2 1190 1194
31

32. Ship Propulsion
http://www.marineinsight.com/tech/main-engine/different-types-of-marine-
propulsion-systems-used-in-the-shipping-world/
32

33. Propeller Selection (Podded Propellers)
Advantages
Owner/operator benefits
High ice breaking capacity
High manoeuvrability in ice
Robust shaft line without gears
Shipyard and construction benefits
Flexibility machinery arrangement
Modularised design
Simplified vessel installation
Reduced installation time and cost
Fewer components
Podded propellers benefits in terms of the
manufacturers
Optimal hydrodynamic design
State of the art bearing technology
Cooling by surrounding seawater gives
compact air cooling cubicle
Safe and easy fitting of pods to hull
without heavy lifting equipment
http://www.marineinsight.com/tech/main-engine/different-types-of-marine-
propulsion-systems-used-in-the-shipping-world/
33
Recommended Manufacturers
Rolls Royce Mermaid ICE and HICE
ABB Azipod VI Series

34. Propeller Selection (contd.) (Analysis)
Propeller has lower than 2.5% back cavitation!
http://www.marineinsight.com/tech/main-engine/different-types-of-marine-propulsion-
systems-used-in-the-shipping-world/
34
Powering calculation to size engine:
Parameters Value Units
Check BHP (DS) 3371 kW
Check BHP (Ice-Assuming 25% prop. Efficiency) 4800 kW
BHP of Engine (Minimum Requirement) 4800 kW
Conclusion
Parameters Value Units
RPM 300 rpm
Diameter of propeller (By hull clearance) 2.5 m
P/D 0.9 -
Pitch 2.25 m
# of Blades 4 -
Blade area ratio 0.7 -

35. Ship Structure35
https://www.flickr.com/photos/27417638@N07/sets/72157622455202566/

36. Structural Design Rationale
 Rules:
 ABS-Requirement for Steel Vessels
 ABS-Ice Class Rules
 Steel hull and aluminum superstructure
 Global loads considered: Wave hogging and sagging moments
 Design procedure attempted:
 Calculate plate thicknesses
 Determine the stiffeners/girders/stanchions/bulkheads sizing to satisfy the ABS and Ice Class rules
 Compute section modulus
 Determine the required section modulus
 Add stiffeners/girders/stanchions/bulkheads with the general arrangement as constraints to satisfy the
required section modulus
36

37. 37

38. Weight Engineering38
http://www.strapsolutions.com/the-weight-of-things-plastic-v-steel/

39. Weight Engineering (Lightship)
SWBS Entry Description Weight-LT
100 Hull Structure 1433
200 Propulsion System 238
300 Electrical System 132
400 Command and Surveillance 35
500 Auxiliary Systems 317
600 Outfitting and Furnishings 274
700 Mission Equipment 97
Total w/o margin 2527
Margin (Concept-Moderate Risk) 14%
Total w margin of Lightship 2880
39

40. Weight Engineering (contd.) (Deadweight)
Weight Group Unit Value Coeff (Ton/unit) Weight (L-Ton)
Crew Persons 45 persons 0.10 5
Provision and Stores Persons 45 persons 0.20 9
SW in Ballast Water Tanks Capacity 595 ton 1.00 595
Fuel Oil Consumption 680 ton/trip 1.25 850
Lube Oil Consumption 13.5 ton/trip 1.25 17
SW in Anti Roll Tank Capacity 235 ton 1.00 235
Fresh Water Consumption 100 ton/trip 1.00 100
Sewage in Holding Tanks Produced 50 ton/trip 0.30 15
Total 1825
Margin 10% 183
Deadweight 2008
40

41. General Arrangements41

42. Main Deck
42
 Features:
All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs

43. Main Deck (contd.)
43
 Features:
Drones (AUVs) Hangar
+
Control Room
(207 sqr. Meters)
 Stern All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs

44. Main Deck (contd.)
44
 Features: Science Laboratories (166 sqr. meters)+ Stores (116 sqr. meters)
Bow
All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs

45. 01 Deck
45
 Features:
Scientists Accommodation (160 sqr. meters)
All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs

46. 02 Deck
46
 Features: Crew Accommodations (206 sqr. meters)
All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs

47. 03 Deck
47
 Features:
All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs

48. Pilot House
48
 Features:
All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs

49. Top House
49
 Features:
All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs

50. Machinery & Tanks Arrangement50
http://www.circulonaval.com/Main_Pages/engineering.htm

51. 1ST Platform
51
 Features:
All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs

52. 2ND Platform
52
 Features:
All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs
Tanks Volumes
Tanks Volume (m3)
Fuel Oil 1031
Lube Oil 20
Fresh Water 101
Sewage 15
Anti-Roll 230
Ballast 803

53. Tank Top
53
 Features:
All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs

54. Inboard Profile54

55. 55 All areas and volumes are “available” quantities and are beyond the
“required” quantities specified by regulations or needs

56. Renderings56

57. 57

58. 58

59. 59

60. Engine Selections60
http://www.cleantechfinland.com/content/w%C3%A4rtsil%C3%A4-supply-australian-mining-site-53-mw-
gas-power-plant-expansion

61. Mission Operating Profile
61

62. Engine Selections
62
http://www.wartsila.com/products/marine-oil-gas/engines-generating-sets/generating-sets/wartsila-
auxpac-20
Wartsila Engine
 Selected Engines:
 (2) Wartsila 1200W8L20
 (2) Wartsila 1800W6L26

63. Engine Selections (contd.)
63
Wartsila Engine Specifications
Parameters 1800W6L26 1200W8L20
Power Per Unit (kW) 1885 1260
Units (-) 2 2
Frequency (Hz) 60 60
Total rated Power (kW) 3770 2520

64. Mission Endurance and Range
64
Vessel Mission Range
Modes Units Ice Breaking
Max Speed
(14 knots)
Transit Speed
(11 knots)
Surveying
Operations
Drones Operations In Port/Anchorage
Speed Knots 2 14 11 9 5 0
Mission Hours hours 144 144 288 633.6 216 14.4
Dist. Traveled NM 288 2016 3168 5702.4 1080 0
Combined Consumption
Rate
Tons/hr 1.06 0.71 0.60 0.58 0.28 0.03
Mission Endurance Specifications
Total Dist. Traveled 12254.4 Nautical Miles
Required Fuel 728.90 Tons/mission
Required Fuel Volume 775.42 m3

65. Ship Electrical System65
http://gizmodo.com/5965577/what-is-electricity

66. Ship Electrical System Considerations
66
http://www.abb.com/cawp/seitp202/6f0d5472c16d3fc4c1257cf9002661ed.aspx

67. Ship Electrical System Considerations
67
http://www.abb.com/cawp/seitp202/6f0d5472c16d3fc4c1257cf9002661ed.aspx

68. Ship Electrical System Considerations (contd.)
68
 ABB DC Link Plant was chosen for RV ANARIS because
the plant presents higher efficiencies and advantages
over its counterpart, the integrated electric plant (IEP)
based on the following criteria:
 High fuel efficiency
 High system redundancy and operational flexibility
 Low maintenance and operating costs
 Improved machinery arrangement and weight requirements

69. Ship Engine and Electrical System Analysis69
http://cvgstrategy.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2013/08/analysis.jpg

70. Fuel Rate Consumption and Costs
70
Fuel Rate Consumption per Year (tons/mission)
Modes Ice Breaking
Max Speed
(14 knots)
Transit Speed
(11 knots)
Surveying
Operations
Drones
Operations
In Port/Anchorage Total
ABB DC Link 153.19 102.12 173.91 367.96 59.87 0.49 857.53
Fuel Rate Consumption per Year (ECA) (t/mission) 68.60
Fuel Rate Consumption per Year (Non-ECA)
(t/mission)
788.93
Fuel Rate Consumption per mission(ECA) (t/mission) 58.31
Fuel Rate Consumption per mission (Non-ECA)
(t/mission)
670.59
Fuel Costs*
Fuel Type Cost ($US/ton)
ABB DC Link
(ton/mission)
Fuel Cost Standard
ABB DC Link
($US)
IFO380 / IFO180 $ 650.00 670.59 $ 435,881.78
MDO $ 950.00 58.31 $ 55,396.35
Total 728.90 $ 491,278.13
*USD/MT based on www.bunkerworld.com

71. Ship Mission System71
http://www.safe.no/index.cfm?id=264816

72. Arctic Underwater Feature
72
 The deepest point is Litke Deep in the Eurasian
Basin, at 5,450 m (17,880 ft)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arctic_Ocean

73. Sonar
73
 For medium water depths:
Kongsberg EM 710 Multi-
beam (2,000 m)
 For ocean basins: Kongsberg
EM 302 Multi-beam (7,000 m)
 For sub bottom: Kongsberg
TOPAS PS18 Parametric Sub
Bottom Profiler (11,000 m)
a) EM 710 sand-waves at Trial Island (Vancouver
Island, British Columbia, Canada)
b) EM302 data in Google Earth, showing the
particular seamount in the Paramount
c) TOPAS PS 18 data from medium water
http://www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0397.nsf/AllWeb/A915A71E90B6CFAEC12571B1003FE84D/$file/306106_em_302_product_specification.pdf?OpenElement

74. Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler
74
 Teledyne RD Instruments: Ocean
Surveyor ADCP 150 kHz (Max
Rang >400 m)
 Teledyne RD Instruments: Ocean
Surveyor ADCP 75kHz (Max
Rang >700 m)
http://www.rdinstruments.com/sen.aspx
http://mysite.pratt.edu/~dchaky/adcp.html

75. AUVs
 For RV ANARIS, the HUGIN 3000 AUVs were chosen. Some features of the AUVs include:
 Capability to survey up to 3000 m of depth.
 Capability for detailed seabed mapping.
 A semi fuel cell battery providing more than 60 hours endurance at four knots speed.
 A standard HUGIN payload suite includes:
 Multi-beam echo sounder
 Side scan or synthetic aperture sonar
 Sub-bottom profiler
 Conductivity temperature density (CTD) etc
75
http://www.safe.no/index.cfm?id=264816

76. AUVs (contd.)
http://www.arkeotekno.com/
76
 Launching phase:
 During launch, the hydraulically operated
stinger with the HUGIN AUV is tilted down
into the water and the vehicle is released
by a disconnect mechanism while the ship
is heading against the wind with a speed
of 2-3 knots.

77. AUVs (contd.)
 Recovery phase:
 During recovery, the ship is
positioned 50 - 100 meters from
where the AUV surfaces. The
vehicle drop nose with the
recovery line is hooked and
connected to the L/R system
winch. The vehicle is then pulled
onto the stinger and the stinger is
lifted and retracted. During
recovery the ship moves forward
at 1 to 2 knots.
http://www.arkeotekno.com/
77

78. AUVs (contd.)
78
http://www.km.kongsberg.com/ks/web/nokbg0240.nsf/AllWeb/B3F87A63D8E419E5C1256A68004E946C?OpenDocument

79. Costs Estimates79
http://imgarcade.com/1/canadian-bills-stack/

80. Cost Estimates
80
Marine Cost Estimating
SHIP TYPE Arctic Hydrograpic Research Vessel
DEADWEIGHT 2008 L-TONS
GROSS TONNAGE 1276 GT
RATES ($/HOUR,OR DECIMAL FRACTION,WHERE NOTED)
LABOR RATE ($/HOUR) 70 MARGIN RATE 10%
OVERHEAD RATE 50% PROFIT RATE 10%
ITEM DESCRIPTION
WEIGHT
(TON)
RATE
(MANHRS/TON)
MAN HOURS RATE ($/MATERIAL) MATERIAL ($)
000 ENGINEERING & YARD SERVICES [-] [-] 100,000 [-] 15,000,000
100 HULL STRUCTURE 1433 90 128,970 1,100 1,576,300
200 PROPULSION 238 60 14,280 80,000 19,040,000
300 ELECTRIC PLANT 132 250 33,000 25,000 3,300,000
400 COMMAND AND SURVEILLANCE 35 600 21,000 100,000 3,500,000
500 MACHINERY, GENERAL 317 200 63,400 50,000 15,850,000
600 OUTFIT & FURNISHINGS 274 150 41,100 20,000 5,480,000
700 SCIENCE OUTFIT 97 200 19,400 120,000 11,640,000
SPARE PARTS [-] [-] [-] [-] 5,500,000
SUB-TOTAL LABOR HOURS 421,150
SUB-TOTAL LABOR DOLLARS 29,480,500
SUB-TOTAL MATERIALS 80,886,300
OVERHEAD RATE 50% 15%
OVERHEAD ($) 14,740,250 12,132,945
TOTAL LABOR,MATERIALS AND OVERHEAD ($) 137,239,995
MARGIN ($) 13,723,999.50
PROFIT ($) 13,724,000
BID PRICE ($) 164,687,994
Note: All $ are CAD

81. Conclusions81
http://toeflspeakingteacher.com/master-conclusion-sentences/

82. What’s Next?
 Although most aspects of the conceptual design of RV ANARIS was touched,
there are still some areas that need refinements and attentions:
 VCG,TCG,LCG estimates based on completed GAs
 Refine weight estimates after the structural calculations are completed
 Seakeeping analysis
 Update stability after weights and CGs are refined
 CFD analysis of the hull
 FEM analysis of the hull
 Propeller performance refinement based on an appropriate Kt-Kq graph
82

83. QUESTIONS?
Acknowledgements:
Jon Mikkelsen
Christopher McKesson
Dan McGreer
Luis
Wang
Kevin
Yasin
83