This presentation formed part of the HEA-funded workshop 'Critical thinking in action: developing analytical skills in Criminology students. An experiential learning approach'
The workshop presented research and facilitated discussion on developing critical thinking skills in criminology students. Discussion of research results and use of a case study approach to teaching and learning highlighted how student views/concerns about their failure in developing critical thinking skills can be addressed via new directions in teaching.
This presentation forms part of a blog post which can be accessed via:
For further details of HEA Social Sciences work relating to active and experiential learning please see: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/disciplines/Soc_Sci/Strategic_2013/ActiveandExperiential
This note describes our analysis of 35 papers from CHI 2011 that aim to improve or support interaction design practice. In our analysis, we characterize how these CHI authors conceptualize design practice and the types of contributions they propose. This work is motivated by the recognition that design methods proposed by HCI researchers often do not fit the needs and constraints of professional design practice. As a complement to the analysis of the CHI papers we also interviewed 13 practitioners about their attitudes towards learning new methods and approaches. We conclude the note by offering some critical reflections about how HCI research can better support actual design practice.
This presentation formed part of the HEA-funded workshop 'Critical thinking in action: developing analytical skills in Criminology students. An experiential learning approach'
The workshop presented research and facilitated discussion on developing critical thinking skills in criminology students. Discussion of research results and use of a case study approach to teaching and learning highlighted how student views/concerns about their failure in developing critical thinking skills can be addressed via new directions in teaching.
This presentation forms part of a blog post which can be accessed via:
For further details of HEA Social Sciences work relating to active and experiential learning please see: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/disciplines/Soc_Sci/Strategic_2013/ActiveandExperiential
This note describes our analysis of 35 papers from CHI 2011 that aim to improve or support interaction design practice. In our analysis, we characterize how these CHI authors conceptualize design practice and the types of contributions they propose. This work is motivated by the recognition that design methods proposed by HCI researchers often do not fit the needs and constraints of professional design practice. As a complement to the analysis of the CHI papers we also interviewed 13 practitioners about their attitudes towards learning new methods and approaches. We conclude the note by offering some critical reflections about how HCI research can better support actual design practice.
How to cultivate a research culture in the emergency departmentkellyam18
Getting research going in emergency departments can be hard but it is vitally important for improving healthcare. This presentation gives tips and strategies for building a research culture. Taking the first step is often the hardest part!
Knowing Me, Knowing You - a Conversation About Our Creative Problem Solving S...Inger Kristine Pitts
by Sue Whittle and Alison Duffy
This talk was part of the ICLCity2013 event at City University London on the 13th May 2013. For more details see: http://www.city.ac.uk/centre-for-creativity-in-professional-practice/services/icl-city-2013
From Passively Received Wisdom to Actively Constructed Knowledge:Teaching Systematic Review Skills As a Foundation of Evidence-Based Management
Presentation by Rob Briner and Neil Walshe
AOM Annual Meeting 2015, Vancouver
The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition
Presentation by Tina Saksida, UPEI
AOM Annual Meeting, 2015, Vancouver
2012.06.20 International and Collaborative ResearchNUI Galway
Professor Chris Brewster, Henley Business School, University of Reading, UK presented this seminar "International and Collaborative Research" at the Whitaker Institute on 20th June 2012.
Writing the winning thesis or dissertation, a step by step guide. Slides have been prepared from the book of the same name authored by Randy L. Joyner, William A. Rouse and Allan A. Glatthorn.
A presentation from the joint CILIP Information Literacy Group and Library and Information Research Group's Writing Research Proposals and Publication event.
How to cultivate a research culture in the emergency departmentkellyam18
Getting research going in emergency departments can be hard but it is vitally important for improving healthcare. This presentation gives tips and strategies for building a research culture. Taking the first step is often the hardest part!
Knowing Me, Knowing You - a Conversation About Our Creative Problem Solving S...Inger Kristine Pitts
by Sue Whittle and Alison Duffy
This talk was part of the ICLCity2013 event at City University London on the 13th May 2013. For more details see: http://www.city.ac.uk/centre-for-creativity-in-professional-practice/services/icl-city-2013
From Passively Received Wisdom to Actively Constructed Knowledge:Teaching Systematic Review Skills As a Foundation of Evidence-Based Management
Presentation by Rob Briner and Neil Walshe
AOM Annual Meeting 2015, Vancouver
The Case for Competition: Learning About Evidence-Based Management Through Case Competition
Presentation by Tina Saksida, UPEI
AOM Annual Meeting, 2015, Vancouver
2012.06.20 International and Collaborative ResearchNUI Galway
Professor Chris Brewster, Henley Business School, University of Reading, UK presented this seminar "International and Collaborative Research" at the Whitaker Institute on 20th June 2012.
Writing the winning thesis or dissertation, a step by step guide. Slides have been prepared from the book of the same name authored by Randy L. Joyner, William A. Rouse and Allan A. Glatthorn.
A presentation from the joint CILIP Information Literacy Group and Library and Information Research Group's Writing Research Proposals and Publication event.
Slides from the workshop presentation on Design-Based Implementation Research for the Multidisciplinary Program in Education Sciences (MPES) at Northwestern University.
Presented by Bill Penuel and Barry Fishman on May 24, 2013.
This presentation formed part of the HEA-funded workshop 'Critical thinking in action: developing analytical skills in Criminology students. An experiential learning approach'
The workshop presented research and facilitated discussion on developing critical thinking skills in criminology students. Discussion of research results and use of a case study approach to teaching and learning highlighted how student views/concerns about their failure in developing critical thinking skills can be addressed via new directions in teaching.
This presentation forms part of a blog post which can be accessed via:
For further details of HEA Social Sciences work relating to active and experiential learning please see: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/disciplines/Soc_Sci/Strategic_2013/ActiveandExperiential
Bridging The Research-Practice Gap Through Evidence-Based Management And Systematic Review.
David Denyer and Rob Briner
Academy of Management Annual Meeting 2014, Philadelphia
Mentoring Students in Aging Research - Dr. Dan Durkinemergeuwf
This activity utilizes a mentoring model to work with students to develop a research project for presentation at the Southeastern Student Mentoring Conference in Gerontology and Geriatrics. The conference is an annual event that takes place in late March or early April.
Delivered at Librarians as Researcher event at York St John University 25th January 2013, hosted by Academic and Research Libraries Group Yorkshire & humberside division.
OBJECTIVES:
To understand the importance of publication and its challenges.
To increase the visibility and accessibility of published papers.
To increase the chance of getting publications cited.
To disseminate the publication by using “Research Tools” effectively.
To increase the chance of research collaboration.
Safalta Digital marketing institute in Noida, provide complete applications that encompass a huge range of virtual advertising and marketing additives, which includes search engine optimization, virtual communication advertising, pay-per-click on marketing, content material advertising, internet analytics, and greater. These university courses are designed for students who possess a comprehensive understanding of virtual marketing strategies and attributes.Safalta Digital Marketing Institute in Noida is a first choice for young individuals or students who are looking to start their careers in the field of digital advertising. The institute gives specialized courses designed and certification.
for beginners, providing thorough training in areas such as SEO, digital communication marketing, and PPC training in Noida. After finishing the program, students receive the certifications recognised by top different universitie, setting a strong foundation for a successful career in digital marketing.
Introduction to AI for Nonprofits with Tapp NetworkTechSoup
Dive into the world of AI! Experts Jon Hill and Tareq Monaur will guide you through AI's role in enhancing nonprofit websites and basic marketing strategies, making it easy to understand and apply.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
Honest Reviews of Tim Han LMA Course Program.pptxtimhan337
Personal development courses are widely available today, with each one promising life-changing outcomes. Tim Han’s Life Mastery Achievers (LMA) Course has drawn a lot of interest. In addition to offering my frank assessment of Success Insider’s LMA Course, this piece examines the course’s effects via a variety of Tim Han LMA course reviews and Success Insider comments.
2. Today:
• Introduction
• Discussion Group:
‘Widening Participation and the Inclusive Curriculum’
• Feedback and further discussion
• What is Action Research?
• Teaching innovation development workshop
• Feedback and further discussion
4. Context – embracing diversity
Valuing difference, recognising different learning needs, and
helping individuals to achieve their full potential
• Gender
• Sexual orientation
• Ethnicity
• Religion
• Abilities and disabilities
• Socio-economic background
• Culture
• Family and caring commitments
• Students dependent on term-time employment
• Mature students
5. Context – gender
ARB registered architects:
2006 4,339 total 86% male 14% female
2016 7,538 total 78% male 22% female
New registrations 62% male 38% female
GMC List of Registered Medical Practitioners:
2006 63% male 37% female
2016 280,785 total 55% male 45% female
General Practitioners:
2016 67,741 total 48% male 52% female
7. The percentage of women who say they have
experienced discrimination while working in architecture
AJ Women in Architecture Survey 2016
8. Context – ethnicity
The General Medical Council and the Law Society publish
statistical information relating to the ethnic diversity of their
profession on their websites. The RIBA does not.
According to the RIBA and Fees Bureau’s 2012 Employment
and Earnings Survey, nearly 94% of architects are white.
Black architects account for just 0.9% of the profession.
In the 2011 census 86% of the UK population is described as
white, 7.5% Asian, 3.3% black and 2.2% mixed.
In London, where about 38% of architects are based, ethnic
minorities account for about 31% of the population.
13. Discussion Group
• Discuss your thoughts as a group
• Make reference to given texts
• Relate to your own experience
• Prepare notes for group discussion
14. Questions to address
• Why is diversity important in architectural education
and the profession?
• How can we recruit a more diverse student cohort?
• How can we better support diversity through course
content, mode of delivery, and forms of assessment?
• How might we change the design studio as a learning
environment to support diversity?
- physical environment
- role of studio design tutor,
- format of tutorials and reviews
16. Action Research
• How do we describe and explain what we are doing?
• Critical reflection on own practice
• Explaining how and why things work
• Checking things are as they should be
• Providing evidence that things are working
• Making changes and improvements where they’re not
• Practice informs theory and theory informs practice
Used by practitioners:
• to investigate own work/practice
• to create own theories of practice
• ideally to inform policy as well as own practice
17. Theoretical basis
• Not only an abstract body of knowledge ‘out there’
• Located within your own practice
• Your knowledge and expertise = your theory of practice
• Practice informs theory and theory informs practice –
they are always transforming each other
What makes something action research?
(rather than everyday good practice)
• Production of evidence (authenticated and validated)
• Making claims public – sharing best practice
18. Developing and implementing
your own Teaching Innovation
• Start as a whole group
• Identify issues needing to be addressed
• Organise into small groups of 2 or 3
• Identify the issue you will focus on
• How might you address it?
• Discussion and development – today and next time
• Implementation – weeks 7-10
• Evaluation – assessing impact
• Dissemination – written assignment
19. Deciding what to investigate
Try to identify something challenging and potentially
transformative – not just an alternative way of achieving the
same outcomes
• Address the tension when values are denied in practice
• Or when personally held values and those of the
organisation or ‘system’ are at odds
20. Possibilities to consider:
• Opportunities for risk taking and playful exploration
• Development of new skills and techniques
• Learning from other disciplines
• Exploration of collaboration and group working
• Peer/student-led learning
• Encouragement of discussion and debate
• Reflection on feedback and assessment
• Self-appraisal and judgement
• Challenging power relationships
• Developing visual literacy and communication
• Enabling autonomous learning
What are you hoping to achieve?
21. Who Takes Part?
• Research participants
- source of data, not objects of study
- it is about what you do, not what they do
• Collaborative colleagues
- getting others involved, working collectively
• Critical friends, validators and advisers
- a sympathetic person offering critical feedback
• Interested observers
- other students, tutors – invite comment
22. Data and evidence
• Collect a variety of types of data
• Qualitative/quantitative/both? – appropriate to research
• Records – field notes, observations, record sheets
• Interviews, questionnaires, marks, work produced
• Diagram the process and map the activity
• Think about how the work is communicated
23. Questions you should ask
• What is my concern? And why am I concerned?
• What kind of evidence can I produce to show why I am
concerned?
• What can I do about it? And what will I do about it?
• What kind of evidence will I produce to show that what I
am doing is having an influence?
• How do I evaluate that influence?
• How do I make sure the judgments I make are reasonably
fair and accurate?
• How do I modify my practice in the light of my
evaluation?
24. Looking ahead:
Tuesday 23 October: Y1 Interim Reviews
Monday 29 October: Seminar 3
What do you want to discuss?
• The Future of architectural education
• Studio as a Learning Environment
• The Crit and the Review
What else?
We will also be further discussing and developing your
research ideas – flesh out ideas in preparation