Member A.O.I.A

Fellow I.C.O.I

Scientific consultant of sybron implant solutions

Manager of implant direct company
1)   Inferior alveolar canal
2)   Mental foramen
3)   Incisive Foramen
4)   Maxillary sinus
5)   Nasal cavity
6)   Interdental space (neighboring teeth)
7)   Bone width (bucco-lingual)
8)   Mylohyoid ridge
 For implants that are to be placed in the
   mandible,   the   distance   from    the
   edentulous alveolar crest to the upper
   border of the inferior alveolar canal
   should be assessed from cross-sectional
   tomographic radiographs.
 The safety zone between the tip of the
   implant and the border of the canal should
   be at least 1-2 mm.

 Patients with compromised vertical bone
   dimension can sometimes be treated by
   placing multiple shorter implants of optimal
   width followed by splinting the prosthetic
   crowns together during the restorative phase
   of therapy.
 The position of the mental formen should
   be identified and located when implant
   surgeries in the premolar and molar areas
   of the mandible are performed.

 In some situations a loop of the nerve can
   be found to extend mesially.
 In one report the anterior loop of the
  mental neurovascular bundle extended
  mesially from 1.1 - 3.3 mm and a safety
  zone of 4 mm was recommended to avoid
  damaging   the   nerve   during     implant
  placement (Kuzmanovic et al.2003)
 When placing an implant in the anterior
   part of the maxilla the size and location of
   the incisive papilla need to be determined.

 In addition, it must be established if there
   is enough bone in the area to place an
   implant or if the area needs to be grafted.
 Anatomic concavities are frequently found
   on the lingual side of the mandible.

 It is important to avoid perforating the lingual
   plate during preparation of the implant site
   since perforations in this location can result
   in   extensive   and    even   life-threatening
   bleeding (Bruggenkate et al. 1993)
 A safe way of performing surgery in this
   area is to reflect a lingual flap at least to a
   level corresponding to the length of the
   implant to be placed.
Anatomical considerations

Anatomical considerations

  • 1.
    Member A.O.I.A Fellow I.C.O.I Scientificconsultant of sybron implant solutions Manager of implant direct company
  • 4.
    1) Inferior alveolar canal 2) Mental foramen 3) Incisive Foramen 4) Maxillary sinus 5) Nasal cavity 6) Interdental space (neighboring teeth) 7) Bone width (bucco-lingual) 8) Mylohyoid ridge
  • 7.
     For implantsthat are to be placed in the mandible, the distance from the edentulous alveolar crest to the upper border of the inferior alveolar canal should be assessed from cross-sectional tomographic radiographs.
  • 8.
     The safetyzone between the tip of the implant and the border of the canal should be at least 1-2 mm.  Patients with compromised vertical bone dimension can sometimes be treated by placing multiple shorter implants of optimal width followed by splinting the prosthetic crowns together during the restorative phase of therapy.
  • 10.
     The positionof the mental formen should be identified and located when implant surgeries in the premolar and molar areas of the mandible are performed.  In some situations a loop of the nerve can be found to extend mesially.
  • 11.
     In onereport the anterior loop of the mental neurovascular bundle extended mesially from 1.1 - 3.3 mm and a safety zone of 4 mm was recommended to avoid damaging the nerve during implant placement (Kuzmanovic et al.2003)
  • 13.
     When placingan implant in the anterior part of the maxilla the size and location of the incisive papilla need to be determined.  In addition, it must be established if there is enough bone in the area to place an implant or if the area needs to be grafted.
  • 20.
     Anatomic concavitiesare frequently found on the lingual side of the mandible.  It is important to avoid perforating the lingual plate during preparation of the implant site since perforations in this location can result in extensive and even life-threatening bleeding (Bruggenkate et al. 1993)
  • 21.
     A safeway of performing surgery in this area is to reflect a lingual flap at least to a level corresponding to the length of the implant to be placed.