The document analyzes the rise and fall of the Japanese semiconductor industry compared to Samsung. It discusses how Japan initially achieved success through technical imitation, government support, and satisfying customer demand. However, Japan later fell behind due to a lack of original technology, narrow product strategies, and failing to invest in new trends. In contrast, Samsung rose sharply by focusing on globalization, low costs, and successfully grasping market trends. The conclusions recommend Japan shift from diversification to concentration, outsource business processes, and focus on research innovation and technology development to regain competitiveness in the semiconductor industry.

1. Analysis of Japanese
Semiconductor Industries
Reporter: Chen Xinge Jin Yong
11 October 2012

2. Abstract
5.Conclusions and Suggestions
4.Why Samsung rise sharply?
3.Why Japan fall behind ?
2.Why Japan achieved success?
1.Brief
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 2

3. 1.Brief
Reached Peak
Entered DRAM
Market
Obtained Decline
technical
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 3

4. 2.1Why Japan achieved success?
Measures of Success Results
Technial Model Got Competitive Advantage(CA)
Import & Imtitation Got Technology as a Competion
Cooperation and Government Weapon
Support Set foot in Semiconductor
Catch up and Surpass Industries
Cultivating CA
Development Model Avoided Strong Attack from
Government Protect American Companys
Commercial Drive Got Substantial Capital for Better
Developing
Consolidating CA
Managemnet Model Demand pull,Sucessufully Satisfy
Market Orinentation Customers
Global Competition Became Strong Country of
Semiconductor Industries
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 4

5. 2.2 Why Japan achieved success?
e top 5 companies in vacuum tubes, transistors and IC
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 5

6. 2.3 Why Japan achieved success?
Semiconductor
Companies Global Sales
Rankings
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 6

7. 3.1Why Japan fall behind ?
Corporate Strategy Innovation Model
Business Model
Lack of Business Process
Outsourcing
Narrow Product Strategy
Bad Competition Strategy
Management Mechanism
Inefficient
Excessive Diversification Technology Strength
Failed to forecast new
Lack of Original Technology
trend in industry
Manufacture Orientated not
development
Failed to note changing Technology,refrained from
competition structure investing in microprocessor
Bad Envirnomental technology
Didn't grasb Cutting-edge
Consciousness
Industries Insight technology
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 7

8. 3.2Why Japan fall behind ?
The global share of major companies (1982 - 1993)
Source: Hiroyuki Itami, "Nippon no Handotai Sangyo, Naze Mitsu no Gyakuten ha Okotta ka",
Japan Broadcast Publishing, Co. Ltd., 1995
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 8

9. 3.3Why Japan fall behind ?
DRAM Concentration Ratio by Company (1982 - 1993)
Source: Hiroyuki Itami, "Nippon no Handotai Sangyo, Naze Mitsu no Gyakuten ha Okotta ka",
Japan Broadcast Publishing, Co. Ltd., 1995
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 9

10. 3.4Why Japan fall behind ?
global DRAM share of major companies (1982 - 1993)
Sh a re by
C20 pa n y (%
om )
18
16 TI
14 マ ク ン
イ ロ
イ テ
ン ル
12 日立製作所
日本電気
10
東芝
8 三星電子
6
4
2
0
1 982 1983 1 984 1 985 1 986 1 987 1 988 1 989 1 990 1 991 1 992 1 993 Ye a r
Source: Hiroyuki Itami, "Nippon no Handotai Sangyo, Naze Mitsu no Gyakuten ha Okotta ka",
Japan Broadcast Publishing, Co. Ltd., 1995
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 10

11. 4.Why Korea Rise Sharply ?
Contributions to Success Results
Strategy
Globalization
Concentrating Strategy
Low Cost
Right Competition Strategy
Technology
Huge financing power
Supports Technology Research
Industries Insight
Sucessfully Grasb Market
Trend 2002 Global DRAM share
Execellent Envirnomental
Consciousness Source: Nikkei Shimbun, June 4, 2003
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 11

12. 5.Conclusions and Suggetions
Stragety
From Diversification to Concentriti
1 Integration of related coporation fine resourc
Strip bad assets and non-core business
Business Model
2 Business Process Outsourcing
Foucs on Research not Manufacture
Innovation
3 Technology Innovation
Management Innovation
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 12

13. Thank you ！
National and Regional Systems of Innovation 13