1. 1984 Analytical Essay
992542
P.5
Finesse of Emotions What makes us human? What makes us human is our curiosity and constant
evolution. What makes us human is the ability to create social categories and to form opinions.
Abstract emotions including love, thought and creativity are what make us human. In 1984, George
Orwell uses his dystopia to show that if we were to abolish these abstract emotions we would cease
to be human and become the simple primates we once were; surviving for the sake of survival.
Orwell uses Winston and Julia's relationship to show the power of the human emotion of love.
Winston is a pessimistic man that has nothing to live for except for life itself, until he meets a love
interest; Julia. Orwell narrates "At the...show more content...
Orwell is stating that the party convinces that your emotions are nothing but "mere feelings". The
party is saying that the same emotions that separate humans from savages are of "no account".
Orwell also asserts the dehumanization of the party members during the re–education of Winston.
O'Brien explains to Winston, "We control matter because we control themind. "Reality is in the
skull" (218). O'Brien convinces Winston that what he perceives the world to be, is nothing but what
the party wants him to perceive. He is telling him that all that he knows means nothing because "we
[the party] control[s] matter" This dehumanizes him by controlling his creativity and thought
processes; they make him think whatever they want him to think. By doing this Winston becomes
nothing but an extant body; a lifeless corpse that has no means of its own aside from survival. The
most powerful weapons in the world are emotions. Emotions not only guide us, but seem to control
us. Emotions are easily manipulated by the government and the media to their choosing in order to
sustain society and promote anything from toy model cars to large scale genocide. Don't let your
emotions be controlled or you will be
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
2. Out, Out by Robert Frost Essay
Out, Out
"Out, Out," by Robert Frost is a gruesomely graphic and emotional poem about the tragic end of a
young boy's life. It is a powerful expression about the fragility of life and the fact that death can
come at any time. Death is always devastating, but it is even more so when the victim is just a
young boy. The fact that the boy's death came right before he could " Call it a day" (750) leads one
to think the tragedy might have been avoided and there by forces the reader to think, "What if." This
poem brings the question of mortality to the reader's attention and shows that death has no age limit.
It was powerful poems such as "Out, Out" that gave Robert Frost the reputation as one of America's
leading 20th century poets. The...show more content...
This was the start of Frost's reputation as one of the great American writers of the 20th century.
"Out, Out" is a great example of a typical Robert Frost poem. This narrative poem tells a story of
human tragedy through the death of a young boy. The poem shows how fragile life can be and
how it can be taken from people in an instant. The boy's tragic death is illuminated for the reader
by a commentator watching the incident from the outside looking in. There is a lot of detail
given to the reader early on describing the saw and the way it "snarled and rattled." These details
and the emphases on the boy's age and his wanting to leave work early made the situation
destined for tragedy. It was as if Frost was preparing us for the tragedy to come, "And nothing
happened: day was all but done"(9). This suggests that something is definitely going to happen.
Another clue that something awful is about to happen is the way the saw is personified it: "
leaped out of the boy's hand" (16). As it is described, the saw jumped out of the boy's hand when
he is called for supper, "As if to prove that saw knew what supper meant" (15). Through the use of
onomatopoeia, the saw is also made to sound vicious like an attack dog when it is heard to snarl
and rattle. The personification and description of the noises of the saw makes defiantly it seem like
a major character in the poem.
The theme of this poem is the boy's
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
3. Analytical Essay
Discourses have powerful social effects and can empower some, while marginalizing others. In
the texts Lost Property and Muriel's Wedding the dominant discourse is relationship. The
audience is positioned to see Josh Tambling from Lost Property as having tough relationships as
he is the one who is expected to pull through. While Muriel Heslop from Muriel's Wedding is
portrayed as unreliable and selfish as the story is told. In the early stages of both texts it is obvious
that Josh and Muriel have different relationships, as Josh is respected and dependable while Muriel
is rejected and a failure. Josh is trustworthy towards his friends which make him respected in his
relationships. For instance, he shows his loyal and respectable values...show more content...
Michael, Josh's older brother finally comes home, not by himself though, he ends up bringing his
girlfriend and with them their new born son. "Mum and Dad, this is Kelly," Michael says proudly,
"and this one here...is your grandson, Stuart." (p266). On the other hand, Muriel's Wedding ends
unfortunately with Muriel's mother dying as she commits suicide from the pressure of her
depression. But not all is bad for Muriel as she returns to Sydney with her friend Rhonda, after she
is in a wheelchair from not recovering from her cancer. Although both texts end in a different way,
the audience is still positioned to see Josh and Muriel as people who have difficult relationships but
in the end rewarding. In conclusion, both Lost Property and Muriel's Wedding mobilize the
discourse of relationships. The reader is positioned to see Josh and Muriel as being pleasing people,
who would do everything for their friendships. Throughout both texts Josh and Muriel are
constructed as characters who display loyalty and respect towards their friends, supporting them
through the harsh periods in their
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
4. Journal Article Analysis Essay example
Journal Article Analysis tgkoontz University of Phoenix
Abstract
A Week 3 assignment in the class, PHL/717 Constructing Meaning, required a philosophical analysis
of an article in the Journal of Psychology. The article investigated how the connection between
knowledge and learning influenced individuals to think about controversial everyday issues. The
analysis included identifying philosophical assumptions, explaining practical significance and
applicability, and relating assumptions and methodology to class readings.
Journal Article Analysis An article in the Journal of Psychology investigated how the connection
between knowledge and learning influenced individuals to think about controversial everyday issues.
...show more content...
The scientific community has debated the methodology of the attainment of knowledge since
Aristotle. Social science, such as the study analyzed here, wants to develop a more engaged
relationship between knowledge and practice (Delanty & Strydom, 2003). Conceiving their study on
previous research done about the nature of knowledge and the nature of learning that influences
thinking, Schommer–Aikins and Hutter (2002) introduced an additional element of contemporary
controversial issues encountered in everyday life. Their research looked to populations outside of
academia to support their hypotheses. Generally, they were able to prove a relationship exists
between individual beliefs about knowledge and learning and the ability to demonstrate higher order
thinking. Education and critical thinking influence these beliefs (p. 16). The nature of knowledge
and learning beliefs influence thinking in everyday life.
Methodology
Kuhn (1996) describes a paradigm as the accepted norm of a science. The standards, rules, and
scientific tradition one follows in a particular area of scientific study comprise the paradigm.
Research, such as the one described here, "is a cumulative enterprise, eminently successful in its
aim, the steady extension of the scope and precision of scientific knowledge" (p. 52). The study
provided
Get more content on HelpWriting.net
5. Art Analysis Essay
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first
impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a
painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its
color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed,
these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they
allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue's face tells us
the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker
or lighter colors can play a role in how we...show more content...
The Stele depicts a simple scene: a seated man and standing woman behind him stare blankly
straight ahead. A woman standing on the left looks down upon them. All of them are ordinary
humans. They are not gods or goddesses. They are private people. Their clothing is plain,
consisting of simple robes. It is representational of a regular family mourning the loss of one of its
members, a scene that most people, even today, are able to relate to hundreds or even thousands of
years later.
The stele conveys a solemn forlornness that can be seen in the figures' faces. Their mouths are
tightly shut; their eyes gaze blankly ahead. The woman on the left stares ahead with little emotion
on her face. The stele does not depict any motion. All of the figures are standing (or sitting) still, in
quiet memorial. This solemnity adds to the emotion of a grave where the stele once stood. There is
no real clear answer as to who is being mourned. Are the seated man and the woman mourning the
loss of their daughter, on the left? Or is the woman on the left mourning the loss of a father? The
sculpture's ambiguity also adds to the emotion that it evokes. It might even be appropriate for its
purpose. Its function was to mark a gravesite – the site of the body of someone who has died. Death
is one of the most complex parts of life. It is the most ambiguous, for nobody knows for sure what
happens in death. The ambiguity of the stele highlights
Get more content on HelpWriting.net