Watergate Scandal Essay

The Watergate Scandal Essay
While the effects of Watergate had far–reaching consequences for journalism, not everything to come
out of the scandal came to be positive. As a result of the Watergate scandal many journalists try to
find a Watergate like story even where there is none, Monicagate is a perfect example. In addition,
many critics of the media argue since Watergate many people have become disenfranchised with
Media's constant negativity. Another result of Watergate is the use of the media as a tool for
political sabotage. Finally, the media of today bombards the average person with so much news
everyday it becomes hard for one to decipher what is actual news and what is just a heap of garbage.
It is important to note Watergate was no doubt an important...show more content...
Namely, the time and energy necessary to uncover the minutiae that Woodward and Bernstein found
would not be available to reporters of today. The seemingly endless amount of stories the media
covers today restrict the amount of time a news outlet has to devote to one story. Woodward and
Bernstein spent a better part of eighteen months investigating Watergate. I imagine you would be
hard–pressed to find an editor willing to let a journalist devote that much time to one story today.
The money needed to fuel such an investigation would be just as hard to come up with as well.
Many newspapers are bleeding from profit losses and such a lengthy investigation would no doubt
cost an extreme amount of money. While other forms of media, namely television, have the vast
resources to fund such an investigation, they hardly lend themselves to such a lengthy and
exhausting inquiry. Sadly, stories like Watergate lack the necessary "flash" factor to be deemed
worthy of televisions attention. Unless the story involves a celebrity or blood many news channels
ignore actual news. The endless reports of Brittany Spears or "Bennifer" drown the real news of
the day. For instance, the recent battles over the misdeeds of Tom Delay only get the slightest
attention but we will no doubt hear every detail of Spears' pregnancy. Perhaps the best arena for
uncovering a Watergate like scandal today would
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Watergate Scandal
The Watergate Scandal Essay written by Unknown The Watergate Scandal was a series of crimes
committed by the President and his staff, who were found to spied on and harassed political
opponents, accepted illegal campaign contributions, and covered up their own misdeeds. On June
17, 1972, The Washington Post published a small story. In this story the reporters stated that five
men had been arrested breaking into the headquarters of the Democratic National Committee. The
headquarters was located in a Washington, D.C., building complex called Watergate. These burglars
were carrying enough equipment to wiretap telephones and take pictures of papers. The Washington
Post had two reporters who researched deep into the story. There names were Carl...show more
content...
All of these aides forced Nixon to begin getting above Muskie in the elections. Overall, the
Democratic nomination went to George McGovern, a liberal senator from South Dakota. His
supporters included many people who supported the civil rights, anti–war, and environmental
movements of the 1960s. McGovern had fought to make the nomination process more open and
democratic. Congress had also passed the 26th amendment to the Constitution allowing
eighteen–year–Olds to vote. As a result, the 1972 Democratic Convention was the first to include
large numbers of woman, minorities, and young people among the delegates. McGovern's campaign
ran into trouble early. The press revealed that his running mate, Thomas Eagleton, had once received
psychiatric treatment. First McGovern stood by Eagleton. Then he abandoned him , picking a
different running mate. In addition, many Democratic voters were attached to Nixon because of his
conservative positions on the Vietnam War and law enforcement. Meanwhile, Nixon's campaign
sailed smoothly along, aided by millions of dollars in funds. Nixon campaign officials collected
much of the money illegally. Major corporations were told to contribute at least 100,000 dollars
each. The collected much it clear that the donations could easily buy the companies influence with
the White House. Many large corporations went along. As shipbuilding tycoon George Steinbrenner
said "it was a shakedown. A plain old–fashioned shakedown"

Watergate Essay
Watergate
"Watergate" is a term used to describe a complex web of political scandals occurring between 1972
and 1974.
Although twenty–five years has passed since the notorious President Nixon resigned from office,
the infamous legacy left by Richard Nixon and his administration will never be forgotten, leaving
the American people with distrust among Politicians and disrespect for the American Presidency. In
August 1968, Nixon stated at a Republican convention, "America is in trouble today not because
her people have failed but because her leaders have failed (Porter, 206)." This ironic quote
foreshadows the demise and corruption of one of the most controversial presidents, Richard
Millhouse Nixon.
On January 20, 1969, Richard...show more content...
George Liddy and E. Howard Hunt; Judge John Sirica sentenced the "Watergate Seven". Although
Nixon was worried about the break–in, he advised the White House press secretary, Ron Ziegler, to
dismiss the incident as "a third–rate burglary" (Anson, 107). In the years ensuing the invasion at the
Watergate building, questions and controversy have surfaced consequent to whether or not the
White House, under the control of President Nixon, was either directly or discursively involved in
the planning or performing of any illegal deeds. As the Watergate scandal unfolded, the Nixon
administration was quick to mitigate the responsibility for the occurrences, however, in actuality,
numerous facts and particulars ascertain White House involvement and justify the repercussions
(Spear, 58).
The arrests of the "Watergate Seven" eventually uncovered a "White House–sponsored plan of
espionage against political opponents and a trail of complicity that led to many of the highest
officials in the land" (Emergy, 11"). These high political executives included former United States
Attorney General John Mitchell, White House Counsel John Dean, White House Special Assistant
on Domestic Affairs John Ehrlichman, White House Chief of Staff H.R. Haldeman, and President
Nixon himself. Evidence corroborating White House involvement was ample and immense. On
April 30, 1973, close to a year after the burglary and subsequent to a grand jury investigation of the
break–in,

The Watergate Scandal Sex, drugs, money, power, you name it and there is a scandal for it, but
look back and you will see that from all the scandals there have been, Watergate was among the
worst. The Watergate scandal had everything. From Nixon disgracing the presidency by lying to
the country and abusing his power, to his committees being involved in illegal acts and a big cover
up. All leading to little side roads of corruption and lies. Watergate is by far one of the worst
presidential scandals in the history of the United States. In the story of Watergate, five burglars
...show more content...
He was also deeply involved with the cover up and still lied about his involvement. During the
times of the unraveling of Watergate, questions were asked about connections with the White
House and the president, but when the president was asked about it at a press conference he
assured Americans that "The White House has no involvement whatever in this particular incident."
He was lying to the country like it was part of his job (Dorman 158). The lying did not end there, it
went on and on for months, and as the scandal kept unraveling, "President Nixon and White House,
and creep officials were deliberately misleading the public about the significance of the Watergate
affair" (158). As Watergate was becoming a front–page article in the newspapers, new evidence was
being uncovered. One piece of evidence that changed the peoples ideas of our president was the
tapping of every conversation in the oval office "since about the 18th month of president Nixon's
term" (Kutler 368). Those tapes would soon prove that the president was deeply involved in the
scandal. During the trials, "the Nixon administration claimed that the March 21st, 1973 meeting was

From the beginning of time, people have always had distrust in the government due to government
scandals and corruption that they attempted to keep from the public. Many of those incidents didn't
stay secretly for long due to the change to modern day media. In this paper we have compiled
together a few of those scandals to compose a writing discussing different cases of corruption and
scandals within the government. The Watergate Scandal was an event that changed the face of the
nation. It was the first time in the History of the United States that a president had been forced to
resign from office due to a scandal. It was the story of the decade, and changed the forefront of
American politics. Richard Nixon allegedly hired several...show more content...
The tape recordings that officials listened to, showed recordings of Nixon listening in on certain
conversations and meetings. After that evidence was uncovered, it became clear to the public that
Nixon was indeed guilty. Although Nixon had ample evidence mounted against him to prove he
was guilty, he did not get impeached because he officially resigned before the impeachment process
could be done. A main reason that Nixon was found guilty is evidence uncovered by Frank Willis,
at midnight on June 17, 1972. He was a security guard at the Watergate Complex and discovered
adhesive tape over the latches of doors. He initially just took off the tape, and didn't really think
much of it. However, he came back, and noticed that someone again had put tape over the doors. He
grew suspicious and decided he would call the police. After the police arrived at the complex in
D.C., there was an arrest made of five men. They were charged with attempted burglary and also
other things dealing with the interception of telephone and other communications. They ended up
being convicted, and were put in jail, although they were just working for the president and his
administration. The Pentagon Papers in addition to The Watergate Scandal was

Essay on The Watergate Scandal
June 17, 1972 forever changed both journalism and politics. A simple botched break–in marked the
downfall of President Richard Nixon, and the rise to glory of two obscure young Washington Post
journalists: Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward. While their investigative journalism revealed the
truth, their questionable methods and ethics have led to these questions; Do the ends justify the
means? Was their behavior ethical and legal? TheWatergate Scandal was a major political scandal
during the Presidency of Nixon. Nixon, paranoid and afraid of losing his reelection, employed men
to do an assortment of illegal activities intended to place the republicans ahead of the democrats in
the election. The activities were not detected until a...show more content...
During different incidents spaced throughout the investigation of Watergate , all four were violated
by Woodward and Bernstein. The first infringement occurred early during Watergate. Bernstein was
investigating Miami ties to the Watergate burglars and agreed to trade information (arrests, mental
illnesses, history of homosexuality) on a name, for the Dade County, Fl district attorney's
knowledge about the connections (Bernstein & Woodward, 1974). It turns out the man
investigated was the DA's opponent in the next election. Bernstein never actually gave the DA
the research; the DA told him he did not need the information anymore. His crime? Plotting with a
prosecutor to investigate a political target (Cook, 2012). Another ethically objectionable choice
was Bernstein illicitly pulling phone and credit card records on Watergate targets (Cook, 2012).
He persuaded a source at a telephone company to give him Bernard Baker's (the burglar) records.
While not illegal at the time, it is presently a federal offense punishable by up to ten years in
prison. Currently, Rupert Murdoch's British newspaper holdings are being destroyed over similar
behavior, and the News of the Earth is gone for illegally accessing voicemails; Bernstein's
infringements were vastly more obtrusive (Cook, 2012). Violating privacy of personal financial
records is completely unethical and a complete infraction of minimizing harm (Society of
Professional

Watergate Scandal Essay
Richard Nixon's time in the White House was, without a doubt, one of the most unusual presidencies
in American history. Nixon quickly took a different approach from the men that came before him;
although he entered office at a trying time for the American people, he insisted that the public
needed the hard facts, not inspirational speeches. However, after winning the election Nixon gave in
to his advisors' desires for an uplifting message, and promised the public that his administration
would be committed to "bringing the American people together". While Nixon rarely repeated this
message, and probably never meant it, Nixon did manage to unite the American people, just not in
the way his advisors intended. The covert methods and...show more content...
Once president, his disgust for the elite translated into a desire to prove that they "no longer
possessed any character". He set out to do this by doing his best to shrink the liberal government
that had developed in the year's prior and particularly rejoiced when his victim either had no idea
who or how he was defeated. Unfortunately, however, the methods in which he used to bring his
enemies down and to protect himself were often shady and underhanded. Perhaps the most shocking
of which were the illegal activities included in the Watergate scandal. Nixon had a hand in not only
selling ambassadorships; but also harassing the Democratic National Committee chairman Lawrence
O'Brien, stealing files to blackmail retired presidents, and even putting spies in political groups he
deemed radical. What would ultimately prove his downfall, however, would be the failed break–in
attempt at the Democratic National Committee Headquarters in the Watergate complex. While Nixon
may not have been aware of the specifics involved in the burglary plans, he had approved the
Gemstone Plan under which the burglary was put into effect. The burglars were hired to break into
the Committee's headquarters and bug the telephones so that Nixon would be able to determine who
was contributing to the Democratic campaign and punish them as he saw fit. Unfortunately for
Nixon, however, a security guard noticed tape covering the locks of several of the doors within the
complex and called the

The Watergate Scandal
Political leaders of the United States were, at one time, thought of as crucial members of our society.
Ideally, their main goal was to represent and satisfy the needs of the American people. Unfortunately,
over the last fifty years, our trust in our administrative representatives has drastically declined.
Beginning with the great conspiracy theory that President John F. Kennedy's assassination in 1963
was actually planned by political leaders, America had, for the first time in history, begun to
question its faith in its very own government. Consequently, the American people became extremely
hesitant when it came to electing officials into office. Despite his loss to JFK in the 1960
presidential election, in 1968, Richard M. Nixon was...show more content...
Since the two reporters from The Washington Post were beginning to put together the entire story
piece–by–piece, the government soon began conducting their own investigation. What the
authorities did not know was that an inside source who had access to all of the FBI files, nicknamed
"Deep Throat", was secretly confirming information for Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward to
publish in the newspaper (Crawford–Mason, Clare). It was not until 2005 when "Deep Throat"
would reveal his identity as Mark Felt – the director of the FBI at the time of the Watergate Scandal
("The Watergate Story: The Post Investigates").
While the government was leading their investigation, it soon became public that John Mitchell, the
current Attorney General who had previously denied any affiliation with the instances at Watergate,
had been keeping a private account specifically intended for collecting information on the
Democrats ("Mitchell Controlled Secret GOP Fund"). Later, the FBI publicly declared that the
Watergate incident "stemmed from a massive campaign of political spying and sabotage conducted
on behalf of President Nixon's re–election and directed by officials of the White House and the
Committee for the Re–election of the President" ("FBI Finds Nixon Aides Sabotaged Democrats").
While The Washington Post continued to follow the story of the Watergate Scandal, most other

Watergate Scandal Summary
In the first article that I read, written by D Burch from the Harvard Crimson web site, it obvious
that their stance on Nixon and Watergate were that of defense; defending Nixon's actions. It is
obvious to me that they were in support of his choices and condoned most of his actions. They did
report that the editorial staff called for his impeachment but it was reluctant at best. Basically they
said that his office of President was hard and that he had done many a great thing prior to this
scandal including honorably ending US involvement in war, bringing home our warriors and POW's
from Southeast Asia, establishing a new candor in relations with the Soviet Union, among others
(Burch, 1974). The second article on the other hand was more of...show more content...
First, many American citizens lost faith and confidence in their elected leaders. This was not the
first scandal of mistrust but it was the biggest known to date. Watergate also paved the way for
new laws to change campaign financing. Another byproduct of Watergate would be the negativity
directed to those in the legal profession, as many of Nixon's aides and Nixon himself were
lawyers. Another thing that Watergate help cause was that Congress became far less passive in its
tactics regarding cooperation with the Presidency. This also changed the way that the press as
whole covered Presidents. There was more skepticism and conspiracy written into articles about the
office after Watergate. For example, take the coverage on Bill Clinton's infidelity, aptly known as
"Zippergate" (Zippergate, N.D.), and the sheer volume of reports on the event in the media. Can you
imagine if Watergate had happened in the modern era of the internet, social media, and smart
phones? WOW! I would imagine that Watergate would have rocked the Nation, no the World at a
much great pace during a time of instant news gratification through the internet. I would also think
that all of the secrecy that happened during Watergate would not have existed as there really is no
such thing as privacy anymore. I would have to think that it would be handled similarly to what is
currently going on with Hillary Clinton

The Watergate Scandal Watergate is the popular name for the political scandal and constitutional
crisis that began with the arrest of five burglars who broke into the Democratic National Committee
headquarters at the Watergate office in Washington D.C. on the night of June 17, 1972. It ended with
the resignation of president Richard M. Nixon. The burglars and two co–potters–G. Gordon Liddy
and E. Howard Hunt were indicated on charges of burglary, conspiracy, and wiretapping. Four
monthes later, they were convicted and sentenced to prison terms by District Court Judge John J.
Sirica, who was convicted that pertinent details had not been unveiled during the trial and proffered
leniency in exchange for further information. As it...show more content...
Amid increasing disclosures of White House involved in the Watergate break–in and its aftermath,
Nixon announced the resignations of John Ehrlichman and H. R. Haldman, two of his closest
advisers, in the dismissal of his counsel John W. Dean III. Growing suspicion of presidential
involvement in the scandel resulted in an intensification of the investigation. Leaders in this inquiry
included Judge Sirica, reporters for the Washington Post, the Ervin committee, and Archibald Cox,
who was sworn in as special prosecutor in May 1973. Dean told the Ervin committee in June that
Nixon had cover–up. A month later, former White House staff Alexander Butterfield revealed that
Nixon had secretly tape–recorded conversations in his offices. Both Cox and the Ervin committee
began efforts to obtain selected tapes. Nixon, citing EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE, refused to
relinquish them and tried to have Cox fired. On Oct. 20, 1973, Attorney General Elliot L.
Richardson, refusing to dismiss Cox, resigned in protest. His deputy, William Ruckelshaus, also
refused and was fired. Nixon's solicitor general, who was next in command, then fired Cox. The
"Saturday night massacre," as the events of that evening became known, heightened suspicions that
Nixon had much to hide. Leon Jaworski, who replaced Cox as special prosecutor on November 1,
continued to press for the tapes. On Mar. 1, 1974, a federal grand jury indicted seven men, including
Haldeman, Ehrlichman,

The Watergate Scandal The mistrust most Americans feel toward the government officials and
political parities of today can be traced back to the Watergate scandal of 1972, which led to the
resignation of an American president. The crimes of the Watergate scandal included political
burglary, bribery, extortion, wiretapping (phone tapping), conspiracy, obstruction of justice,
destruction of evidence, tax fraud, illegal use of the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and the
Federal Bureau of Investigations (FBI), illegal campaign contributions, and use of taxpayers' money
for private purposes. On June 17, 1972, five men were arrested at 2:30 a.m. They were caught trying
to "bug" the offices of the Democratic National Committee at...show more content...
There is no place in our campaign or in the electoral process for this type of activity, and we will
not permit or condone it." ( What Was Watergate? by: Pamela Kilian ) Just two weeks after the
arrests were made Mitchell resigned from the president's reelection committee. When the Watergate
burglary occurred, President Nixon was in the Bahamas vacationing. The leaders of the CRP were
in Los Angeles and several of Nixon's top aids were in Key Biscayne, Florida. But no matter where
they were, the top officials at the White House and the reelection committee learned about the
break–in within forty–eight hours after it occurred. No one suggested admitting that it was a White
House operation though. Soon after the break–in, G. Gordon Liddy and E. Howard Hunt Jr. were
linked to the break–in. Liddy began to work with the president's reelection committee after working
for the FBI. Liddy put together the plan that led to the break–in. Hunt did undercover work for
Nixon. He was in the Watergate building helping to direct the burglars the night they were caught.
On September 15, 1972, Hunt, Liddy, and the Watergate burglars were indicted by a federal grand
jury. They were accused of "bugging" telephones and stealing papers from the Democratic National
Committee. Just two days after they were

The Watergate Scandal Essay examples
The Watergate Scandal The Watergate Affair, is the worst political scandal in U.S. history. It led to
the resignation of the president, Richard M. Nixon, after he became implicated in an attempt to
cover up the scandal. "The Watergate Affair" refers to the break–in and electronic bugging in 1972,
of the Democratic National Committee headquarters in the Watergate apartment, and office building
complex in Washington D.C. The term was applied to several related scandals. More than thirty
administration officials, campaign officials, and financial contributors pleaded guilty or were found
guilty of breaking the law. Nixon faced possible indictment after his resignation, received from his
successor, Gerald Ford, a full pardon for...show more content...
Ehrlichman was ordered to destroy incriminating documents and tapes. Then L. Patrick Gray
resigned as acting director of the FBI, later admitting he had destroyed documents given to him by
Ehrlichman and Dean. On June 23, 1972, Nixon learned about Mitchell's possible link with the
operation, and Nixon instructed the FBI to stop the inquiry into the source of money used by the
men who tapped the building. He said that "the investigation would endanger the CIA operations."
Dean and the others subsequently sought to induce CIA officials to cooperate with this plan. On
July 1, Mitchell left the CRP, citing personal reasons. On August 29, Nixon declared that no one in
the administration, then employed, was involved in the Watergate. Although money found in the
possession of the wire tappers was traced to the CRP, such evidence was insufficient to implicate
high officials. On September 15, only the five men first arrested, plus Liddy and E. Howard Hunt ,
one of the plumbers, were indicted (Carson 2). In January 1973, two months after Nixon's
reelection, the seven indicted men were tried before Judge John Sirica in the U.S. district court in
Washington D.C. Five pleaded guilty, and McCord and Liddy were convicted of conspiracy,
burglary, and illegal wiretapping. Meanwhile, suspicions grew that the break–in was part of the
broad program of political espionage. The U.S. Senate voted to conduct an

Watergate Scandal Essay
On June 18, 1972, the Washington Post published an article under the title "5 Held in Plot to Bug
Democrats' Office Here". The author, Alfred E. Lewis, claimed that five men, one being an ex–CIA
agent, three being native–born Cubans, and the last being said to have trained Cuban exiles for
guerilla warfare, were caught planting bugs in the offices of the National Democratic Committee.
This article sparked an important breakthrough in American journalism. Catching the attention of
Post writers Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward, they began to pursue the story. The works later
published by Bernstein and Woodward unmasked the man behind the bugging plot, Richard Nixon,
President of the United States. After this discovery, known as the...show more content...
In their conversation, which is written in Dennis Lythgoe's article "Tapes Show Nixon Weighed
Pros and Cons of Hush Money", Dean said "it would take one million dollars" to pay off the five
men, "an amount that would be hard to raise." Nixon replied, "you could get a million dollars. You
could get it in cash. I know where it could be gotten. It is not easy, but it could be done." The
president's own words proved that he was involved with the break–in and that he used "hush money"
to keep witnesses silent. Another tape recording, called the "smoking gun", uncovered Nixon's
exploitation of the CSI. In the tape, Nixon plans to have Richard Helms, the Director of the CIA,
and Vernon A. Walters, the Deputy Director of the CIA, call the Director of the CIA, Patrick Gray,
and demand that he stop the Watergate investigation. This crime was more severe than the "hush
money" crime, and it was the prime reason Nixon was charged with obstruction of justice.
Nixon was secondly charged with Abuse of Power (Article II), essentially because of his misuse of
"executive personnel" (historyplace.com). He used the FBI to harass "enemies" that he saw as
"political opponents" (presidentprofiles.com). Nixon requested investigations of these "enemies" in
an attempt to find information about them that he could leak to the press. He used the Secret
Service as well to gain a furtive intelligence of Senator Edward Kennedy's personal

Watergate Paper
Watergate Paper
Paul Salabarria
HIS/145
June 26, 2012
Jeff Wilson
Watergate Paper Watergate was a scandal that involved a break
–in into the offices of the Democratic
National Committee during the Nixon administration. Watergate was one of the most famous
political scandals in American history. Decades after Watergate historians and others continue to
argue about its causes and significance (Brinkley, 2007). It marked a period that both weakened our
relationships with other countries as well as weakened the public's belief in the President. A
majority of Americans believe that newspapers, radio and television are devoting too much space
and time to covering the Watergate scandals ("53%," 1974). Both Time and Newsweek reported that
...show more content...
Yet the public has already believed as much for some time now, and for that purpose the disclosure
is superfluous ("Review and outlook," 1974). Mayor Lindsay criticized the reporting of the
Watergate scandal as contributing to "intolerable breakdown of the rule and the spirit of the law."
He chastised the press for disregarding grand–jury secrecy, punishing without due process of law and
trial "by investigators who leak their suspicions before going to trial" (Schumach, 1973). The
Watergate scandal appeared to have damaged the reputation of the United States abroad. Public
interest in Watergate intensified virtually throughout the world, but there was no indication that it
would significantly affect America's foreign policy. Watergate had a great deal of radio and
television coverage in most European countries and Watergate most certainly diluted Japanese
confidence in America. The Russian leaders had staked a lot on personal relations with Mr. Nixon
and did not want the President's Watergate embarrassment to rub off on them (Collins, 1973). A
leading Republican conservative called for President Nixon's resignation, but Mr. Nixon reiterated
his determination to stay in office. GOP Sen. James Buckley issued his surprise call for the
President's immediate resignation at a morning news conference, stating that Mr. Nixon should quit
"in order to preserve the presidency." Mr.

Watergate Scandal
It was suggested that the President had tried to repair the damages that were caused the Watergate
scandal in the first article. From a speech President Nixon had given, it showed that there were a lot
things that still needed to be done regarding the scandal. The article stated that the officials under the
Watergate scandal were cheating, lying and engaging in illegal activities while in high positions of
the government.
The people believed that the president did not stand up to the crisis and that he had only done the
bare requirements for the situation at hand. The people stongly believed that President Nixon should
have done something more to eliminate the Watergate scandal as soon as it was leaked. The article
had also showed...show more content...
The Chicago Tribune's editorial called for the impeachment of the President, and the author still
believed that the President had tried his best in handling of the matter (Genovese, et. all, 2012).
The scandal forced changes to the politicians that hold office by making renovations in the
statehouse in the way that elections are ran and politicians run their office. The crisis ended with
President Nixon being impeached and a scandal that will forever be remember in American history.
Reforms were done due to the pressure of the scandal. Because of the scandal, the people demand
more honesty from their constintuants. The people also require limits on the amount of money
politicians can spend.
The events change the general view on how the press covered politicians. From that point, the press
was able to include the internal personal life of politician reviling what they had otherwise hidden
from the public. It was as a result of pressure from the Chicago Tribune's editorial coverage that
showed the failures and neglects from the President in his handling of the Watergate crisis that
ultimately led to his resignation.
In a time of social media and smartphones, coverage of the Watergate scandal could have been
different because any of the information that was hidden during those that time would be easily
available to the American citizens (Olson, 2003). All facets of social media would have covered the
crisis

Watergate Scandal Essay

More Related Content

Similar to Watergate Scandal Essay

More from Best Paper Writing Service Reviews

Recently uploaded

Watergate Scandal Essay