Advanced literature search strategies for scientific and medical writing- improving your effectivity in finding the information you need in PubMed. https://bit.ly/2IzYdxB
As a researcher, you are expected to start publishing early in your career. But original research could take years to complete! This does not mean you that you cannot publish a paper until you complete your research. You can disseminate your research in many other ways. These slides will help you learn more about the different types of scholarly literature so that you are able to choose the most suitable format for publishing your study.
Digital strategies to find the right journal for publishing your researchSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
Date: Apr 3, 2019
Speaker: Duncan Nicholas, Former Development Editor at international academic publisher Taylor and Francis Group, and now Director of DN Journals research publishing consultancy, and Senior Consultant for Enago Academy.
Overview: This webinar will provide an overview of digital tools and initiatives that help researchers select the right journal for their manuscript to ensure the best chance of article acceptance.
Short PowerPoint presentation outlining important things to consider when deciding where to publish your research. This presentation also lists some of the tools that can be used to evaluate journal quality to assist in the publishing decision-making process.
As a researcher, you are expected to start publishing early in your career. But original research could take years to complete! This does not mean you that you cannot publish a paper until you complete your research. You can disseminate your research in many other ways. These slides will help you learn more about the different types of scholarly literature so that you are able to choose the most suitable format for publishing your study.
Digital strategies to find the right journal for publishing your researchSC CTSI at USC and CHLA
Date: Apr 3, 2019
Speaker: Duncan Nicholas, Former Development Editor at international academic publisher Taylor and Francis Group, and now Director of DN Journals research publishing consultancy, and Senior Consultant for Enago Academy.
Overview: This webinar will provide an overview of digital tools and initiatives that help researchers select the right journal for their manuscript to ensure the best chance of article acceptance.
Short PowerPoint presentation outlining important things to consider when deciding where to publish your research. This presentation also lists some of the tools that can be used to evaluate journal quality to assist in the publishing decision-making process.
There are some common criteria you should consider when choosing a journal to publish in. Once you have a publication strategy in place, choose journals that meet all of your criteria.
This presentation is about shortlisting and choosing journals for publishing. It also discusses quality issues, including predatory and hijacked journals. Most appropriate for Social Science students.
This ppt will provide the support to finding the indexing of publication and also will help to manage your research profile among world research forums.
Clinical Research for Medical StudentsAhmed Negida
This presentation discusses (1) the importance of clinical research to medical students, (2) barriers towards student research, and (3) how to select a good mentor.
Presentació realitzada per Ana Marušić en el marc del Seminari sobre la revisió per experts (peer review) que va tenir lloc a la Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació de la UB el 20 de juny de 2011, dins el marc del programa de doctorat “Informació i Documentació en la Societat del Coneixement”. Aquest seminari va ser organitzat conjuntament amb l'EASE (European Association of Science Editors).
Scientific research and its publication
A process and the research process
Writing and submitting a paper to a journal
Other processes in research
Literagure review
Research design
Qualitative research
Conclusion
The review process
How to do a Literature search for your research and scientific publication BhaskarBorgohain4
In the age of information boom it may be challenging task to find relevant information for your research work. its like finding a needle in a haystack. After initial readings from textbooks and library journals you may want to first search in Wikipedia, google, google scholar and then go to Pubmed, Medline, science direct , wileyonline, science.gov, cochrane library etc to formulate your keywords based on your research question. read a medical dictionary to find synonyms of the keywords and brainstorm with your supervisor, peers, friends etc to get more key words to search again and find the right search strategy. do not forget to look for Grey literature like unpublished Thesis works from reputed universities, proceedings of conferences of reputed professional associations as well. keep records using a software like end-note, Rayyan etc. References of authors must be recorded as you go along.
There are some common criteria you should consider when choosing a journal to publish in. Once you have a publication strategy in place, choose journals that meet all of your criteria.
This presentation is about shortlisting and choosing journals for publishing. It also discusses quality issues, including predatory and hijacked journals. Most appropriate for Social Science students.
This ppt will provide the support to finding the indexing of publication and also will help to manage your research profile among world research forums.
Clinical Research for Medical StudentsAhmed Negida
This presentation discusses (1) the importance of clinical research to medical students, (2) barriers towards student research, and (3) how to select a good mentor.
Presentació realitzada per Ana Marušić en el marc del Seminari sobre la revisió per experts (peer review) que va tenir lloc a la Facultat de Biblioteconomia i Documentació de la UB el 20 de juny de 2011, dins el marc del programa de doctorat “Informació i Documentació en la Societat del Coneixement”. Aquest seminari va ser organitzat conjuntament amb l'EASE (European Association of Science Editors).
Scientific research and its publication
A process and the research process
Writing and submitting a paper to a journal
Other processes in research
Literagure review
Research design
Qualitative research
Conclusion
The review process
How to do a Literature search for your research and scientific publication BhaskarBorgohain4
In the age of information boom it may be challenging task to find relevant information for your research work. its like finding a needle in a haystack. After initial readings from textbooks and library journals you may want to first search in Wikipedia, google, google scholar and then go to Pubmed, Medline, science direct , wileyonline, science.gov, cochrane library etc to formulate your keywords based on your research question. read a medical dictionary to find synonyms of the keywords and brainstorm with your supervisor, peers, friends etc to get more key words to search again and find the right search strategy. do not forget to look for Grey literature like unpublished Thesis works from reputed universities, proceedings of conferences of reputed professional associations as well. keep records using a software like end-note, Rayyan etc. References of authors must be recorded as you go along.
Finding scholarly nursing articles in databasesForsyth Library
This tutorial demonstrates how to find full-text, scholarly articles in a variety of nursing databases available to students, staff and faculty of Fort Hays State University.
Original Work, NO PLAGERIESM, Cite Reference, References, 100 word.docxgerardkortney
Original Work, NO PLAGERIESM, Cite Reference, References, 100 words
https://www.kff.org/disparities-policy/issue-brief/beyond-health-care-the-role-of-social-determinants-in-promoting-health-and-health-equity/
Read article and just in your own words comment on your thoughts regarding the article.
192177
by Elbert Washington
FILE
T IME SUBMIT T ED 28- DEC- 2017 12:25PM WORD COUNT 11857
CHARACT ER COUNT 6537 3
DRAFT _19217 7 .DOCX (27 8.99K)
%5
SIMILARIT Y INDEX
EXCLUDE QUOT ES ON
EXCLUDE
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ON
192177
ORIGINALITY REPORT
192177
WRITECHECK REPORT
PAGE 1
PAGE 2
PAGE 3
PAGE 4
PAGE 5
PAGE 6
PAGE 7
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
PAGE 10
PAGE 11
PAGE 12
PAGE 13
PAGE 14
PAGE 15
PAGE 16
PAGE 17
PAGE 18
PAGE 19
PAGE 20
PAGE 21
PAGE 22
PAGE 23
PAGE 24
PAGE 25
PAGE 26
PAGE 27
PAGE 28
PAGE 29
PAGE 30
PAGE 31
PAGE 32
PAGE 33
PAGE 34
PAGE 35
PAGE 36
PAGE 37
PAGE 38
PAGE 39
PAGE 40
PAGE 41
PAGE 42
PAGE 43
PAGE 44
PAGE 45
192177by Elbert Washington192177ORIGINALITY REPORT192177WRITECHECK REPORT
How to conduct meta-analysis: A Basic Tutorial
Arindam Basu
University of Canterbury
May 12, 2017
Concepts of meta-analyses
Meta analysis refers to a process of integration of the results of many studies to arrive at evidence syn-
thesis (Normand, 1999). Meta analysis is essentially systematic review; however, in addition to narrative
summary that is conducted in systematic review, in meta analysis, the analysts also numerically pool the
results of the studies and arrive at a summary estimate. In this paper, we discuss the key steps of conducting
a meta analysis. We intend to discuss the steps of a simple meta analysis with a demonstration of the key
steps from a published paper on meta analysis and systematic review of the effectiveness of salt restricted
diet on blood pressure control. This paper is a basic introduction to the process of meta-analysis. In subse-
quent papers in this series, we will discuss how you can conduct meta analysis of diagnostic and screening
studies, and principles of network meta analyses, where you can conduct a meta analysis with more than
one intervention or exposure variable.
Nine Steps to Meta Analyses
We recommend in general the following nine steps of meta analysis. These nine steps are in general applicable
to all meta-analyses.
1. Frame a question (based on a theory)
2. Run a search (on Pubmed/Medline, Google Scholar, other sources)
3. Read the abstract and title of the individual papers.
4. Abstract information from the selected set of final articles.
5. Determine the quality of the information in these articles. This is done using a judgment of their
internal validity but also using the GRADE criteria
6. Determine the extent to which these articles are heterogeneous
7. Estimate the summary effect size in the form of Odds Ratio and using both fixed and random effects
.
Earliest Galaxies in the JADES Origins Field: Luminosity Function and Cosmic ...Sérgio Sacani
We characterize the earliest galaxy population in the JADES Origins Field (JOF), the deepest
imaging field observed with JWST. We make use of the ancillary Hubble optical images (5 filters
spanning 0.4−0.9µm) and novel JWST images with 14 filters spanning 0.8−5µm, including 7 mediumband filters, and reaching total exposure times of up to 46 hours per filter. We combine all our data
at > 2.3µm to construct an ultradeep image, reaching as deep as ≈ 31.4 AB mag in the stack and
30.3-31.0 AB mag (5σ, r = 0.1” circular aperture) in individual filters. We measure photometric
redshifts and use robust selection criteria to identify a sample of eight galaxy candidates at redshifts
z = 11.5 − 15. These objects show compact half-light radii of R1/2 ∼ 50 − 200pc, stellar masses of
M⋆ ∼ 107−108M⊙, and star-formation rates of SFR ∼ 0.1−1 M⊙ yr−1
. Our search finds no candidates
at 15 < z < 20, placing upper limits at these redshifts. We develop a forward modeling approach to
infer the properties of the evolving luminosity function without binning in redshift or luminosity that
marginalizes over the photometric redshift uncertainty of our candidate galaxies and incorporates the
impact of non-detections. We find a z = 12 luminosity function in good agreement with prior results,
and that the luminosity function normalization and UV luminosity density decline by a factor of ∼ 2.5
from z = 12 to z = 14. We discuss the possible implications of our results in the context of theoretical
models for evolution of the dark matter halo mass function.
Richard's aventures in two entangled wonderlandsRichard Gill
Since the loophole-free Bell experiments of 2020 and the Nobel prizes in physics of 2022, critics of Bell's work have retreated to the fortress of super-determinism. Now, super-determinism is a derogatory word - it just means "determinism". Palmer, Hance and Hossenfelder argue that quantum mechanics and determinism are not incompatible, using a sophisticated mathematical construction based on a subtle thinning of allowed states and measurements in quantum mechanics, such that what is left appears to make Bell's argument fail, without altering the empirical predictions of quantum mechanics. I think however that it is a smoke screen, and the slogan "lost in math" comes to my mind. I will discuss some other recent disproofs of Bell's theorem using the language of causality based on causal graphs. Causal thinking is also central to law and justice. I will mention surprising connections to my work on serial killer nurse cases, in particular the Dutch case of Lucia de Berk and the current UK case of Lucy Letby.
THE IMPORTANCE OF MARTIAN ATMOSPHERE SAMPLE RETURN.Sérgio Sacani
The return of a sample of near-surface atmosphere from Mars would facilitate answers to several first-order science questions surrounding the formation and evolution of the planet. One of the important aspects of terrestrial planet formation in general is the role that primary atmospheres played in influencing the chemistry and structure of the planets and their antecedents. Studies of the martian atmosphere can be used to investigate the role of a primary atmosphere in its history. Atmosphere samples would also inform our understanding of the near-surface chemistry of the planet, and ultimately the prospects for life. High-precision isotopic analyses of constituent gases are needed to address these questions, requiring that the analyses are made on returned samples rather than in situ.
Nutraceutical market, scope and growth: Herbal drug technologyLokesh Patil
As consumer awareness of health and wellness rises, the nutraceutical market—which includes goods like functional meals, drinks, and dietary supplements that provide health advantages beyond basic nutrition—is growing significantly. As healthcare expenses rise, the population ages, and people want natural and preventative health solutions more and more, this industry is increasing quickly. Further driving market expansion are product formulation innovations and the use of cutting-edge technology for customized nutrition. With its worldwide reach, the nutraceutical industry is expected to keep growing and provide significant chances for research and investment in a number of categories, including vitamins, minerals, probiotics, and herbal supplements.
Multi-source connectivity as the driver of solar wind variability in the heli...Sérgio Sacani
The ambient solar wind that flls the heliosphere originates from multiple
sources in the solar corona and is highly structured. It is often described
as high-speed, relatively homogeneous, plasma streams from coronal
holes and slow-speed, highly variable, streams whose source regions are
under debate. A key goal of ESA/NASA’s Solar Orbiter mission is to identify
solar wind sources and understand what drives the complexity seen in the
heliosphere. By combining magnetic feld modelling and spectroscopic
techniques with high-resolution observations and measurements, we show
that the solar wind variability detected in situ by Solar Orbiter in March
2022 is driven by spatio-temporal changes in the magnetic connectivity to
multiple sources in the solar atmosphere. The magnetic feld footpoints
connected to the spacecraft moved from the boundaries of a coronal hole
to one active region (12961) and then across to another region (12957). This
is refected in the in situ measurements, which show the transition from fast
to highly Alfvénic then to slow solar wind that is disrupted by the arrival of
a coronal mass ejection. Our results describe solar wind variability at 0.5 au
but are applicable to near-Earth observatories.
This pdf is about the Schizophrenia.
For more details visit on YouTube; @SELF-EXPLANATORY;
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCAiarMZDNhe1A3Rnpr_WkzA/videos
Thanks...!
3. You search lots of publications and experience that it is
sometimes hard to find the specific information you are
looking for. Maybe it is time to change your literature search
strategy to speed up and improve your writing process. There
are basically two things that are important for a good search:
the search engine and the search terms you use.
Literature search engine
4. Many people start their literature search at Google, and there is
nothing wrong with that if you are entirely new to a field and want
to get a feel for the terms. For scientific or medical writing,
however, you need sources that you can rely on to be accurate and
trustworthy. So for searching scientific articles and reviews – these
last ones are also a good starting point on a new subject- you may
want to use PubMed (over 28 million biomedical publications,
including books). PMC is a database that also contains biomedical
publications, except a lot fewer (only around 5 million) than
PubMed, as all publications in PMC are freely accessible. So if you
want to avoid the frustration of finding a perfect publication and
then not having access to it, you may want to use PMC instead of
PubMed. If you are looking for specific information on clinical
trials that are planned, in progress, or completed you can find many
here.
5. Literature search terms
The most basic search is with a combination of keywords, you can
use them in any search engine. There are however many ways
to narrow or broaden your literature search. The below options
are geared towards PubMed and PMC but will also work with
many other search engines:
• By using quotation marks you can look for a specific phrase.
For instance, if you are looking for primary immunodeficiency
you will get 30841 results in PubMed, while with "primary
immunodeficiency" only 3353. With late onset combined
immunodeficiency you get 71 results while "late onset
combined immunodeficiency" returns only 10.
6. • By using square brackets you can indicate in which field
your search term should be present. For instance, if you are
looking for a publication in a specific year using "2018"[Date
- Publication]. Or for a specific range of years
use ("1995"[Date - Publication] : "2018"[Date -
Publication]), which can be useful if you want to review
everything after a specific date. With hiv[Title] you can look
specifically for HIV in the Title. You can find these and many
other options for advanced searching by clicking on Advanced
below the PubMed or PMC search box.
7. •By using AND, OR, and NOT you can further specify your
search. For example, if you are looking for something on
immunodeficiency but are tired of scrolling through the
enormous amount of articles on HIV, you may want to exclude
those by using a query such as (immunodeficiency) NOT
hiv[Title] NOT "human immunodeficiency virus"[Title]. On the
other hand, if you want to find all articles with HIV you may
want to search for HIV OR "human immunodeficiency virus".
• There are also several pre-set search options that can help you
narrow down or broaden a specific topic or search strategy. You
can find them here. They range from the very simple ´all
retracted publications´ to very extensive search strategies to find
everything ever written on for instance AIDS. You can review
the actual search strategies there as well.
8. • Another pre-set search option you may want to add to your
search is the search strategy for systematic reviews that you
can find here with which you can retrieve all citations
identified as systematic reviews, meta-analyses, reviews of
clinical trials, evidence-based medicine, consensus
development conferences, guidelines, and citations to articles
from journals specializing in review studies. Instead of adding
the complete list of search terms for this you can just add
systematic [sb] to your search strategy. For instance, by
searching for "rheumatoid arthritis" you will get 125411 hits,
while with "rheumatoid arthritis" systematic [sb] you only
find 3053 publications.
9. • You can also keep up to date on a specific subject by using
Create Alert. First you specify the search strategy, for
instance, "chronic granulomatous disease" AND (mutation OR
"genetic defect") to –in this case- obtain all publications on
mutations in CGD. Then you click on the Create Alert option
below the search box. You need to create an account to have
all new publications on this subject sent to your mailbox on a
daily, weekly, or monthly basis. You can add other searches as
well to create a weekly overview of all new publications in
your field or by a specific author.
10. Tip: if you are writing a systematic review, meta-analysis, or
similar report where systematic analysis of the literature is
key, be sure to record the literature search strategy and the
database searched as many journals will want you to provide
this information.
Tip: make sure you enter all publications that may be relevant
into a reference management program, you can add notes and
keywords, or group by subject. It will save a lot of time and
hassle later on.