The document defines the determinant of a square matrix. For a 1x1 matrix with value k, the determinant is defined to be k. For a 2x2 matrix with values a, b, c, d, the determinant is defined as ad - bc. This definition is motivated geometrically as representing the signed area of the parallelogram formed by the vector points (a,b) and (c,d). It is also motivated algebraically in that a system of equations has a unique solution if and only if the determinant of the coefficient matrix is non-zero. Cramer's rule is presented for solving systems of linear equations.
HG to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you tdbddhdhdhdbhddhhddhhfhfhfhfhhffhfhhfhfhfhhffhhfhfhfhhfhhfbfbfbfbfbfbfbfbbfbbfbfbfbfbfbfbfbbffbbfbfbfbbfbfbfbfrrrwshdtewyegerydyyrhrhrhrrhhrhrhrhrho the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to your families to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to your families to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you nrjjrj to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to the to you to
Mathematics (from Greek μάθημα máthēma, “knowledge, study, learning”) is the study of topics such as quantity (numbers), structure, space, and change. There is a range of views among mathematicians and philosophers as to the exact scope and definition of mathematics
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
A Strategic Approach: GenAI in EducationPeter Windle
Artificial Intelligence (AI) technologies such as Generative AI, Image Generators and Large Language Models have had a dramatic impact on teaching, learning and assessment over the past 18 months. The most immediate threat AI posed was to Academic Integrity with Higher Education Institutes (HEIs) focusing their efforts on combating the use of GenAI in assessment. Guidelines were developed for staff and students, policies put in place too. Innovative educators have forged paths in the use of Generative AI for teaching, learning and assessments leading to pockets of transformation springing up across HEIs, often with little or no top-down guidance, support or direction.
This Gasta posits a strategic approach to integrating AI into HEIs to prepare staff, students and the curriculum for an evolving world and workplace. We will highlight the advantages of working with these technologies beyond the realm of teaching, learning and assessment by considering prompt engineering skills, industry impact, curriculum changes, and the need for staff upskilling. In contrast, not engaging strategically with Generative AI poses risks, including falling behind peers, missed opportunities and failing to ensure our graduates remain employable. The rapid evolution of AI technologies necessitates a proactive and strategic approach if we are to remain relevant.
June 3, 2024 Anti-Semitism Letter Sent to MIT President Kornbluth and MIT Cor...Levi Shapiro
Letter from the Congress of the United States regarding Anti-Semitism sent June 3rd to MIT President Sally Kornbluth, MIT Corp Chair, Mark Gorenberg
Dear Dr. Kornbluth and Mr. Gorenberg,
The US House of Representatives is deeply concerned by ongoing and pervasive acts of antisemitic
harassment and intimidation at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). Failing to act decisively to ensure a safe learning environment for all students would be a grave dereliction of your responsibilities as President of MIT and Chair of the MIT Corporation.
This Congress will not stand idly by and allow an environment hostile to Jewish students to persist. The House believes that your institution is in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, and the inability or
unwillingness to rectify this violation through action requires accountability.
Postsecondary education is a unique opportunity for students to learn and have their ideas and beliefs challenged. However, universities receiving hundreds of millions of federal funds annually have denied
students that opportunity and have been hijacked to become venues for the promotion of terrorism, antisemitic harassment and intimidation, unlawful encampments, and in some cases, assaults and riots.
The House of Representatives will not countenance the use of federal funds to indoctrinate students into hateful, antisemitic, anti-American supporters of terrorism. Investigations into campus antisemitism by the Committee on Education and the Workforce and the Committee on Ways and Means have been expanded into a Congress-wide probe across all relevant jurisdictions to address this national crisis. The undersigned Committees will conduct oversight into the use of federal funds at MIT and its learning environment under authorities granted to each Committee.
• The Committee on Education and the Workforce has been investigating your institution since December 7, 2023. The Committee has broad jurisdiction over postsecondary education, including its compliance with Title VI of the Civil Rights Act, campus safety concerns over disruptions to the learning environment, and the awarding of federal student aid under the Higher Education Act.
• The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is investigating the sources of funding and other support flowing to groups espousing pro-Hamas propaganda and engaged in antisemitic harassment and intimidation of students. The Committee on Oversight and Accountability is the principal oversight committee of the US House of Representatives and has broad authority to investigate “any matter” at “any time” under House Rule X.
• The Committee on Ways and Means has been investigating several universities since November 15, 2023, when the Committee held a hearing entitled From Ivory Towers to Dark Corners: Investigating the Nexus Between Antisemitism, Tax-Exempt Universities, and Terror Financing. The Committee followed the hearing with letters to those institutions on January 10, 202
Macroeconomics- Movie Location
This will be used as part of your Personal Professional Portfolio once graded.
Objective:
Prepare a presentation or a paper using research, basic comparative analysis, data organization and application of economic information. You will make an informed assessment of an economic climate outside of the United States to accomplish an entertainment industry objective.
Acetabularia Information For Class 9 .docxvaibhavrinwa19
Acetabularia acetabulum is a single-celled green alga that in its vegetative state is morphologically differentiated into a basal rhizoid and an axially elongated stalk, which bears whorls of branching hairs. The single diploid nucleus resides in the rhizoid.
2. The determinant of an nxn square matrix A,
or det(A), is a number.
Determinant
3. The determinant of an nxn square matrix A,
or det(A), is a number.
We define the determinant of a 1x1 matrix k ,
or det k to be k. Hence det –3 = –3.
Determinant
4. The determinant of an nxn square matrix A,
or det(A), is a number.
We define the determinant of a 1x1 matrix k ,
or det k to be k. Hence det –3 = –3.
We define the determinant of the 2x2 matrix
or det
a b
c d
a b
c d
Determinant
5. The determinant of an nxn square matrix A,
or det(A), is a number.
We define the determinant of a 1x1 matrix k ,
or det k to be k. Hence det –3 = –3.
We define the determinant of the 2x2 matrix
or det = ad
a b
c d
a b
c d
Determinant
6. The determinant of an nxn square matrix A,
or det(A), is a number.
We define the determinant of a 1x1 matrix k ,
or det k to be k. Hence det –3 = –3.
We define the determinant of the 2x2 matrix
or det = ad – bc
a b
c d
a b
c d
Determinant
7. The determinant of an nxn square matrix A,
or det(A), is a number.
We define the determinant of a 1x1 matrix k ,
or det k to be k. Hence det –3 = –3.
We define the determinant of the 2x2 matrix
or det = ad – bc
a b
c d
a b
c d
Here are two motivations for this definition.
Determinant
8. The determinant of an nxn square matrix A,
or det(A), is a number.
We define the determinant of a 1x1 matrix k ,
or det k to be k. Hence det –3 = –3.
We define the determinant of the 2x2 matrix
or det = ad – bc
a b
c d
a b
c d
Here are two motivations for this definition.
I. (Geometric) Let (a, b) and (c, d)
be two points in the rectangular
coordinate system.
(a, b)(c, d)
Determinant
9. The determinant of an nxn square matrix A,
or det(A), is a number.
We define the determinant of a 1x1 matrix k ,
or det k to be k. Hence det –3 = –3.
We define the determinant of the 2x2 matrix
or det = ad – bc
a b
c d
a b
c d
Here are two motivations for this definition.
I. (Geometric) Let (a, b) and (c, d)
be two points in the rectangular
coordinate system.
Then det
a b
c d
= ad – bc
= “Signed” area of the parallelogram as shown.
(a, b)(c, d)
“Signed” area
= ad – bc
Determinant
11. Determinant
Let’s verify this in the simple cases where one of the
points is on the axis.
For example, Iet the points be
(a, 0) and (c, d) as shown.
(a, 0)
(c, d)
12. Determinant
Let’s verify this in the simple cases where one of the
points is on the axis.
For example, Iet the points be
(a, 0) and (c, d) as shown.
then the area of the
parallelogram is
det
a 0
c d
(a, 0)
(c, d)
d
= ad
13. Determinant
Let’s verify this in the simple cases where one of the
points is on the axis.
For example, Iet the points be
(a, 0) and (c, d) as shown.
then the area of the
parallelogram is
det
a 0
c d
(a, 0)
(c, d)
d
If we switch the order of the two rows then
det
c d
= – ad
= ad
a 0
14. Determinant
Let’s verify this in the simple cases where one of the
points is on the axis.
For example, Iet the points be
(a, 0) and (c, d) as shown.
then the area of the
parallelogram is
det
a 0
c d
(a, 0)
(c, d)
d
If we switch the order of the two rows then
det
a 0
c d
= – ad
= ad
What’s the meaning of the “–” sign?
(besides that the rows are switched)
15. Determinant
Let’s verify this in the simple cases where one of the
points is on the axis.
For example, Iet the points be
(a, 0) and (c, d) as shown.
then the area of the
parallelogram is
det
a 0
c d
(a, 0)
(c, d)
d
If we switch the order of the two rows then
det
a 0
c d
= – ad
= ad
What’s the meaning of the “–” sign?
(besides that the rows are switched). Actually it tells
us the “relative position” of these two points.
16. Determinant
Given a point A(a, b) ≠ (0, 0), the dial with the tip at A
defines a direction.
A(a, b)A(a, b)
17. Determinant
Given a point A(a, b) ≠ (0, 0), the dial with the tip at A
defines a direction. Let B(c, d) be another point,
there are two possibilities, A(a, b)A(a, b)
18. Determinant
Given a point A(a, b) ≠ (0, 0), the dial with the tip at A
defines a direction. Let B(c, d) be another point,
there are two possibilities,
either B is to the left or
it’s to the right of dial A
as shown.
A(a, b)
B(c, d)
A(a, b)
B(c, d)
19. Determinant
Given a point A(a, b) ≠ (0, 0), the dial with the tip at A
defines a direction. Let B(c, d) be another point,
there are two possibilities,
either B is to the left or
it’s to the right of dial A
as shown.
The determinant
identifies which case it is.
A(a, b)
B(c, d)
A(a, b)
B(c, d)
20. Determinant
If det
a b
c d
is +, then B is to the left of A.
Given a point A(a, b) ≠ (0, 0), the dial with the tip at A
defines a direction. Let B(c, d) be another point,
there are two possibilities,
either B is to the left or
it’s to the right of dial A
as shown.
i.
The determinant
identifies which case it is. det
A
B
A(a, b)
B(c, d)
A(a, b)
B(c, d)
> 0
B is to the left of A.
21. Determinant
If det
a b
c d
is +, then B is to the left of A.
Given a point A(a, b) ≠ (0, 0), the dial with the tip at A
defines a direction. Let B(c, d) be another point,
there are two possibilities,
either B is to the left or
it’s to the right of dial A
as shown.
i.
ii.
The determinant
identifies which case it is. det
A
B
A(a, b)
B(c, d)
A(a, b)
B(c, d)
> 0 det
A
B < 0
B is to the left of A. B is to the right of A.
If det
a b
c d is –, then B is to the right of A.
22. Determinant
If det
a b
c d
is +, then B is to the left of A.
Given a point A(a, b) ≠ (0, 0), the dial with the tip at A
defines a direction. Let B(c, d) be another point,
there are two possibilities,
either B is to the left or
it’s to the right of dial A
as shown.
i.
ii.
The determinant
identifies which case it is. det
A
B
A(a, b)
B(c, d)
A(a, b)
B(c, d)
> 0 det
A
B < 0
B is to the left of A. B is to the right of A.
If det
a b
c d is –, then B is to the right of A.
For example det
1 0
0 1
> 0 and det
1 0
0 1
< 0.
23. It is in the above sense that we have the
signed-area-answer of det A.
Determinant
24. So given the picture to the right: (a, b)(c, d)
It is in the above sense that we have the
signed-area-answer of det A.
Determinant
25. So given the picture to the right:
det
a b
c d
= + Area of
(a, b)(c, d)
It is in the above sense that we have the
signed-area-answer of det A.
Determinant
26. So given the picture to the right:
det
a b
c d
= + Area of
(a, b)(c, d)
det
a b
c d
= – Area of
and
It is in the above sense that we have the
signed-area-answer of det A.
Determinant
27. So given the picture to the right:
det
a b
c d
= + Area of
(a, b)(c, d)
det
a b
c d
= – Area of
and
It is in the above sense that we have the
signed-area-answer of det A.
Example A. Find the area.
Determinant
(5,–3)
(1,4)
28. So given the picture to the right:
det
a b
c d
= + Area of
(a, b)(c, d)
det
a b
c d
= – Area of
and
It is in the above sense that we have the
signed-area-answer of det A.
Example A. Find the area.
Determinant
(5,–3)
(1,4)
det
5 –3
1 4
To find the area, we calculate
29. So given the picture to the right:
det
a b
c d
= + Area of
(a, b)(c, d)
det
a b
c d
= – Area of
and
It is in the above sense that we have the
signed-area-answer of det A.
Example A. Find the area.
Determinant
(5,–3)
(1,4)
det
5 –3
1 4
To find the area, we calculate
= 5(4) – 1(–3) = 23 = area
30. So given the picture to the right:
det
a b
c d
= + Area of
(a, b)(c, d)
det
a b
c d
= – Area of
and
It is in the above sense that we have the
signed-area-answer of det A.
Example A. Find the area.
Determinant
(5,–3)
(1,4)
det
5 –3
1 4
To find the area, we calculate
= 5(4) – 1(–3) = 23 = area
Note that if a, b, c and d are integers,
then the -area is an integer also.
31. Here is another motivation for the 2x2 determinants.
Determinant
32. Here is another motivation for the 2x2 determinants.
Determinant
Il. (Algebraic) The system of equations
det
a b
c d
≠ 0
ax + by = #
cx + dy = #
has exactly one solution if and only if
33. Here is another motivation for the 2x2 determinants.
Here are examples where we don’t have exactly
one solution.
Determinant
Il. (Algebraic) The system of equations
det
a b
c d
≠ 0
ax + by = #
cx + dy = #
has exactly one solution if and only if
{x + y = 2
2x + 2y = 4
34. Here is another motivation for the 2x2 determinants.
Here are examples where we don’t have exactly
one solution.
Duplicated information.
Infinitely many solutions.
Determinant
Il. (Algebraic) The system of equations
det
a b
c d
≠ 0
ax + by = #
cx + dy = #
has exactly one solution if and only if
{x + y = 2
2x + 2y = 4
35. Here is another motivation for the 2x2 determinants.
Here are examples where we don’t have exactly
one solution.
Duplicated information.
Infinitely many solutions.
Determinant
Il. (Algebraic) The system of equations
det
a b
c d
≠ 0
ax + by = #
cx + dy = #
has exactly one solution if and only if
{x + y = 2
2x + 2y = 4
{x + y = 2
2x + 2y = 5
36. Here is another motivation for the 2x2 determinants.
Here are examples where we don’t have exactly
one solution.
Duplicated information.
Infinitely many solutions.
Determinant
Il. (Algebraic) The system of equations
det
a b
c d
≠ 0
ax + by = #
cx + dy = #
has exactly one solution if and only if
{x + y = 2
2x + 2y = 4
{x + y = 2
2x + 2y = 5
Contradictory information.
No solutions.
37. Here is another motivation for the 2x2 determinants.
Here are examples where we don’t have exactly
one solution.
Duplicated information.
Infinitely many solutions.
Determinant
Il. (Algebraic) The system of equations
det
a b
c d
≠ 0
ax + by = #
cx + dy = #
has exactly one solution if and only if
{x + y = 2
2x + 2y = 4
{x + y = 2
2x + 2y = 5
Contradictory information.
No solutions.
Note that the coefficient matrix has det
1 1
2 2 = 0.
38. Here is the Cramer’s rule that actually gives
the only solution of the system
Determinant
if det
a b
c d
= D ≠ 0
ax + by = u
cx + dy = v
39. Here is the Cramer’s rule that actually gives
the only solution of the system
Determinant
if det
a b
c d
= D ≠ 0
ax + by = u
cx + dy = v
{x + y = 2
x + 4y = 5
Example B. Use the Cramer’s rule to solve for x & y.
40. Here is the Cramer’s rule that actually gives
the only solution of the system
Determinant
if det
a b
c d
= D ≠ 0
ax + by = u
cx + dy = v
{x + y = 2
x + 4y = 5
Example B. Use the Cramer’s rule to solve for x & y.
1 1
1 4
= 3 = D ≠ 0det
41. Here is the Cramer’s rule that actually gives
the only solution of the system
Determinant
if det
a b
c d
= D ≠ 0
ax + by = u
cx + dy = v
namely that x =
det
u b
v d
D
{x + y = 2
x + 4y = 5
Example B. Use the Cramer’s rule to solve for x & y.
1 1
1 4
= 3 = D ≠ 0det
42. Here is the Cramer’s rule that actually gives
the only solution of the system
Determinant
if det
a b
c d
= D ≠ 0
ax + by = u
cx + dy = v
namely that x =
det
u b
v d
D
{x + y = 2
x + 4y = 5
Example B. Use the Cramer’s rule to solve for x & y.
1 1
1 4
= 3 = D ≠ 0det
so that x =
det
2 1
5 4
3
43. Here is the Cramer’s rule that actually gives
the only solution of the system
Determinant
if det
a b
c d
= D ≠ 0
ax + by = u
cx + dy = v
namely that x =
det
u b
v d
D
{x + y = 2
x + 4y = 5
Example B. Use the Cramer’s rule to solve for x & y.
1 1
1 4
= 3 = D ≠ 0det
so that x =
det
2 1
5 4
3
= 1
44. Here is the Cramer’s rule that actually gives
the only solution of the system
Determinant
if det
a b
c d
= D ≠ 0
ax + by = u
cx + dy = v
namely that x =
det
u b
v d
D
y =
det
a u
c v
D
{x + y = 2
x + 4y = 5
Example B. Use the Cramer’s rule to solve for x & y.
1 1
1 4
= 3 = D ≠ 0det
so that x =
det
2 1
5 4
3
= 1
45. Here is the Cramer’s rule that actually gives
the only solution of the system
Determinant
if det
a b
c d
= D ≠ 0
ax + by = u
cx + dy = v
namely that x =
det
u b
v d
D
y =
det
a u
c v
D
{x + y = 2
x + 4y = 5
Example B. Use the Cramer’s rule to solve for x & y.
1 1
1 4
= 3 = D ≠ 0det
so that x =
det
2 1
5 4
3
y =
det
1 2
1 5
3
= 1 = 1
46. The determinant of a 3×3 matrix, may be defined
in the following expansion of 2×2 determinants:
Determinant
det
a b c
d e f
g h i
47. The determinant of a 3×3 matrix, may be defined
in the following expansion of 2×2 determinants:
Example C. Calculate.
Determinant
det
a b c
d e f
g h i
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
48. det
e f
h i
= a*
The determinant of a 3×3 matrix, may be defined
in the following expansion of 2×2 determinants:
Determinant
det
a b c
d e f
g h i
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
Example C. Calculate.
49. det
e f
h i
= a*
The determinant of a 3×3 matrix, may be defined
in the following expansion of 2×2 determinants:
Determinant
det
a b c
d e f
g h i
det
1 0
3 –1= 1*det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
Example C. Calculate.
50. det
e f
h i
= a*
The determinant of a 3×3 matrix, may be defined
in the following expansion of 2×2 determinants:
Determinant
det
a b c
d e f
g h i
det– b*
d f
g i
det
1 0
3 –1= 1*det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
Example C. Calculate.
51. det
e f
h i
= a*
The determinant of a 3×3 matrix, may be defined
in the following expansion of 2×2 determinants:
Determinant
det
a b c
d e f
g h i
det– b*
d f
g i
det
1 0
3 –1= 1*det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
Example C. Calculate.
det– 0*
2 0
2 –1
52. det
e f
h i
= a*
The determinant of a 3×3 matrix, may be defined
in the following expansion of 2×2 determinants:
Determinant
det
a b c
d e f
g h i
det– b* det+ c*
d f
g i
d e
det
1 0
3 –1= 1*det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
Example C. Calculate.
det– 0*
2 0
2 –1
53. det
e f
h i
= a*
The determinant of a 3×3 matrix, may be defined
in the following expansion of 2×2 determinants:
Example C. Calculate.
Determinant
det
a b c
d e f
g h i
det– b* det+ c*
d f
g i
d e
det
1 0
3 –1= 1*det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det– 0* det+ 2*
2 0
2 –1
2 1
54. det
e f
h i
= a*
The determinant of a 3×3 matrix, may be defined
in the following expansion of 2×2 determinants:
Example C. Calculate.
Determinant
det
a b c
d e f
g h i
det– b* det+ c*
d f
g i
d e
det
1 0
3 –1= 1*det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det– 0* det+ 2*
2 0
2 –1
2 1
= 1(–1 – 0) – 0 + 2(6 – 2)
55. det
e f
h i
= a*
The determinant of a 3×3 matrix, may be defined
in the following expansion of 2×2 determinants:
Example C. Calculate.
Determinant
det
a b c
d e f
g h i
det– b* det+ c*
d f
g i
d e
det
1 0
3 –1= 1*det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det– 0* det+ 2*
2 0
2 –1
2 1
= 1(–1 – 0) – 0 + 2(6 – 2)
= –1 + 8
= 7
56. Don’t remember this!
det
e f
h i
= a*
The determinant of a 3×3 matrix, may be defined
in the following expansion of 2×2 determinants:
Example C. Calculate.
Determinant
det
a b c
d e f
g h i
det– b* det+ c*
= a(ei – hf) – b(ei – hf) + c(dh – ge)
d f
g i
d e
det
1 0
3 –1= 1*det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det– 0* det+ 2*
2 0
2 –1
2 1
= 1(–1 – 0) – 0 + 2(6 – 2)
= –1 + 8
= 7
57. Here is the useful Butterfly method
for the determinant of a 3×3 matrix.
Determinant
a b c
d e f
g h i
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det
Example D. Calculate using the Butterfly method.
58. Here is the useful Butterfly method
for the determinant of a 3×3 matrix.
Determinant
a b c
d e f
g h i
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det
Example D. Calculate using the Butterfly method.
a b c
d e f
g h i
a b
d e
g h
Enlarge the matrix
by adding the
first two columns.
59. Here is the useful Butterfly method
for the determinant of a 3×3 matrix.
Determinant
a b c
d e f
g h i
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det
Example D. Calculate using the Butterfly method.
a b c
d e f
g h i
a b
d e
g h
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
1 0
2 1
2 3
Enlarge the matrix
by adding the
first two columns.
60. Here is the useful Butterfly method
for the determinant of a 3×3 matrix.
Determinant
a b c
d e f
g h i
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det
Example D. Calculate using the Butterfly method.
a b c
d e f
g h i
a b
d e
g h
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
1 0
2 1
2 3
Enlarge the matrix
by adding the
first two columns.
Add all these diagonal products
61. Here is the useful Butterfly method
for the determinant of a 3×3 matrix.
Determinant
a b c
d e f
g h i
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det
Example D. Calculate using the Butterfly method.
a b c
d e f
g h i
a b
d e
g h
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
1 0
2 1
2 3
Enlarge the matrix
by adding the
first two columns.
Add all these diagonal products
Add –1 0 12
62. Here is the useful Butterfly method
for the determinant of a 3×3 matrix.
Determinant
a b c
d e f
g h i
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det
Example D. Calculate using the Butterfly method.
a b c
d e f
g h i
a b
d e
g h
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
1 0
2 1
2 3
Enlarge the matrix
by adding the
first two columns.
Subtract all these diagonal products
Add all these diagonal products
Add –1 0 12
63. Here is the useful Butterfly method
for the determinant of a 3×3 matrix.
Determinant
a b c
d e f
g h i
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det
Example D. Calculate using the Butterfly method.
a b c
d e f
g h i
a b
d e
g h
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
1 0
2 1
2 3
Enlarge the matrix
by adding the
first two columns.
Subtract all these diagonal products
Add all these diagonal products
Subtract 4 0 0
Add –1 0 12
64. Here is the useful Butterfly method
for the determinant of a 3×3 matrix.
Determinant
a b c
d e f
g h i
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
det
Example D. Calculate using the Butterfly method.
a b c
d e f
g h i
a b
d e
g h
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
1 0
2 1
2 3
Enlarge the matrix
by adding the
first two columns.
Subtract all these diagonal products
Add all these diagonal products
Subtract 4 0 0
Add –1 0 12
(–1 +12) – 4 = 7
65. The det A of a 3×3 matrix A similarly gives
the volume of a solid in 3D space.
Determinant
67. The det A of a 3×3 matrix A similarly gives
the volume of a solid in 3D space.
Specifically,
Determinant
(a, b, c)
(d, e, f)
(0, 0, 0)
(g, h, i)
a b c
d e f
g h i
det = ± the volume of
68. The det A of a 3×3 matrix A similarly gives
the volume of a solid in 3D space.
Specifically,
Again there the ± are the two “orientations” of the
objects defined by these coordinates.
Determinant
(a, b, c)
(d, e, f)
(0, 0, 0)
(g, h, i)
a b c
d e f
g h i
det = ± the volume of
69. The det A of a 3×3 matrix A similarly gives
the volume of a solid in 3D space.
Specifically,
Again there the ± are the two “orientations” of the
objects defined by these coordinates.
If we switch two of the coordinates in our labeling,
say x and y, we would get a left handed copy
of the solid.
Determinant
(a, b, c)
(d, e, f)
(0, 0, 0)
(g, h, i)
a b c
d e f
g h i
det = ± the volume of
70. The det A of a 3×3 matrix A similarly gives
the volume of a solid in 3D space.
Specifically,
Again there the ± are the two “orientations” of the
objects defined by these coordinates.
If we switch two of the coordinates in our labeling,
say x and y, we would get a left handed copy
of the solid. But if we switch the labeling again,
we would get back to the original right handed solid.
Determinant
(a, b, c)
(d, e, f)
(0, 0, 0)
(g, h, i)
a b c
d e f
g h i
det = ± the volume of
71. Likewise the 3x3 system
Determinant
≠ 0det
a b c
d e f
g h i
has a unique answer iff the
ax + by + cz = #
dx + ey + fz = #
gx + hy + iz = #
72. Likewise the 3x3 system
Determinant
There is a 3x3 (in general nxn) Cramer’s Rule that
gives the solutions for x, y, and z but it’s not useful
for computational purposes-too many steps!
≠ 0det
a b c
d e f
g h i
has a unique answer iff the
ax + by + cz = #
dx + ey + fz = #
gx + hy + iz = #
73. Likewise the 3x3 system
Determinant
ax + by + cz = #
There is a 3x3 (in general nxn) Cramer’s Rule that
gives the solutions for x, y, and z but it’s not useful
for computational purposes-too many steps!
dx + ey + fz = #
gx + hy + iz = #
≠ 0det
a b c
d e f
g h i
has a unique answer iff the
We will show a method of finding the determinants of
n x n matrices.
74. Likewise the 3x3 system
Determinant
ax + by + cz = #
There is a 3x3 (in general nxn) Cramer’s Rule that
gives the solutions for x, y, and z but it’s not useful
for computational purposes-too many steps!
dx + ey + fz = #
gx + hy + iz = #
≠ 0det
a b c
d e f
g h i
has a unique answer iff the
We will show a method of finding the determinants of
n x n matrices. The Cramer’s Rule establishes that:
an nxn linear system has a unique answer iff
the det(the coefficient matrix) ≠ 0.
76. Determinant
We need two points to define the
two edges of a parallelogram
and three points for the three edges
of a tilted box.
77. Determinant
We need two points to define the
two edges of a parallelogram
and three points for the three edges
of a tilted box. The coordinates of
these points form 2x2 and 3x3
square matrices and the determinants
of these matrices give the signed
areas and volumes respectively.
78. Determinant
We need two points to define the
two edges of a parallelogram
and three points for the three edges
of a tilted box. The coordinates of
these points form 2x2 and 3x3
square matrices and the determinants
of these matrices give the signed
areas and volumes respectively.
Likewise, we need n points to
determine an “n-dimensional box”
whose coordinates form an nxn matrix.
79. Determinant
We need two points to define the
two edges of a parallelogram
and three points for the three edges
of a tilted box. The coordinates of
these points form 2x2 and 3x3
square matrices and the determinants
of these matrices give the signed
areas and volumes respectively.
Likewise, we need n points to
determine an “n-dimensional box”
whose coordinates form an nxn matrix.
Below we give one method to find the determinants of
nxn matrices which is the signed “volumes” of these
“n-dimensional” boxes.
82. Determinant
Finding Determinants-Expansion by the First Row
Let A be an nxn matrix as shown.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . aij .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
The submatrix Aij of A
is the matrix left after deleting
the i'th row and j’th column of A.A =
83. Determinant
Finding Determinants-Expansion by the First Row
Let A be an nxn matrix as shown.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . aij .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
The submatrix Aij of A
is the matrix left after deleting
the i'th row and j’th column of A.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . . .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
A =
Aij = aij
84. Determinant
Finding Determinants-Expansion by the First Row
Let A be an nxn matrix as shown.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . aij .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
The submatrix Aij of A
is the matrix left after deleting
the i'th row and j’th column of A.
For example, if
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . . .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
A =
Aij =
A =
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
, then
A23 =aij
85. Determinant
Finding Determinants-Expansion by the First Row
Let A be an nxn matrix as shown.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . aij .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
The submatrix Aij of A
is the matrix left after deleting
the i'th row and j’th column of A.
For example, if
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . . .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
A =
Aij =
A =
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
, then
A23 =
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
delete the 2nd row
and the 3rd column
aij
86. Determinant
Finding Determinants-Expansion by the First Row
Let A be an nxn matrix as shown.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . aij .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
The submatrix Aij of A
is the matrix left after deleting
the i'th row and j’th column of A.
For example, if
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . . .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
A =
Aij =
A =
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
, then
A23 =
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
delete the 2nd row
and the 3rd column
aij
=
1 0
2 3
89. Determinant
Finding Determinants-Expansion by the First Row
Let A be an nxn matrix as shown.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . . .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
The determinant of A or det(A)
may be calculated using the
determinants of its
submatrices Aij’s.
A =
90. Determinant
Finding Determinants-Expansion by the First Row
Let A be an nxn matrix as shown.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . . .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
The determinant of A or det(A)
may be calculated using the
determinants of its
submatrices Aij’s.
Here is the formula for det(A)
using the determinants of the
submatrices from the 1st row.
A =
91. Determinant
Finding Determinants-Expansion by the First Row
Let A be an nxn matrix as shown.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . . .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
The determinant of A or det(A)
may be calculated using the
determinants of its
submatrices Aij’s.
Here is the formula for det(A)
using the determinants of the
submatrices from the 1st row.
A =
det(A) ≡ a11det(A11)–a12det(A12) +a13det(A13) – ..(±)a1ndet(A1n)
92. Determinant
Finding Determinants-Expansion by the First Row
Let A be an nxn matrix as shown.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . . .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
The determinant of A or det(A)
may be calculated using the
determinants of its
submatrices Aij’s.
Here is the formula for det(A)
using the determinants of the
submatrices from the 1st row.
A =
det(A) ≡ a11det(A11)–a12det(A12) +a13det(A13) – ..(±)a1ndet(A1n)
Hence using this formula,
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
93. Determinant
Finding Determinants-Expansion by the First Row
Let A be an nxn matrix as shown.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . . .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
The determinant of A or det(A)
may be calculated using the
determinants of its
submatrices Aij’s.
Here is the formula for det(A)
using the determinants of the
submatrices from the 1st row.
A =
det(A) ≡ a11det(A11)–a12det(A12) +a13det(A13) – ..(±)a1ndet(A1n)
Hence using this formula,
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
= 1det – 0 + 2det1 0
3 –1
2 1
2 3
94. Determinant
Finding Determinants-Expansion by the First Row
Let A be an nxn matrix as shown.
a11 a12 . . a1n
a21 a22 . . a2n
. . . . .
. . . . .
an1 . . . ann
The determinant of A or det(A)
may be calculated using the
determinants of its
submatrices Aij’s.
Here is the formula for det(A)
using the determinants of the
submatrices from the 1st row.
A =
det(A) ≡ a11det(A11)–a12det(A12) +a13det(A13) – ..(±)a1ndet(A1n)
Hence using this formula,
det
1 0 2
2 1 0
2 3 –1
= 1det – 0 + 2det1 0
3 –1
2 1
2 3
= –1 + 8 = 7 (same answer as in eg. D)
95. Determinant
Example E. Find the following determinant using
the 1st row expansion.
2 0 −1 0
1 0 0 2
0 1 1 0
−1 2 0 1
det
96. Determinant
Example E. Find the following determinant using
the 1st row expansion.
2 0 −1 0
1 0 0 2
0 1 1 0
−1 2 0 1
det
= 2 det
0 0 2
1 1 0
2 0 1
2
97. Determinant
Example E. Find the following determinant using
the 1st row expansion.
2 0 −1 0
1 0 0 2
0 1 1 0
−1 2 0 1
det
= 2 det
0 0 2
1 1 0
2 0 1
– 0
0
98. Determinant
Example E. Find the following determinant using
the 1st row expansion.
2 0 −1 0
1 0 0 2
0 1 1 0
−1 2 0 1
det
= 2 det
0 0 2
1 1 0
2 0 1
– 0 + (−1)det
1 0 2
0 1 0
–1 2 1
−1
99. Determinant
Example E. Find the following determinant using
the 1st row expansion.
2 0 −1 0
1 0 0 2
0 1 1 0
−1 2 0 1
det
= 2 det
0 0 2
1 1 0
2 0 1
– 0 + (−1)det
1 0 2
0 1 0
–1 2 1
0
– 0
100. Determinant
Example E. Find the following determinant using
the 1st row expansion.
2 0 −1 0
1 0 0 2
0 1 1 0
−1 2 0 1
det
= 2 det
0 0 2
1 1 0
2 0 1
– 0 + (−1)det
1 0 2
0 1 0
–1 2 1
– 0
= −11