The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
Insecticide spray regime effect on cowpea yield and financial returns in nort...africa-rising
Poster prepared by Kotu, B., Abdul Rahman, N., Larbi, A., Akakpo, D.B., Asante, M., Mellon, S.B. and Hoeschle-Zeledon, I. for the AfrIca RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March-1 April 2016
Machine Learning in Agriculture Module 1Prasenjit Dey
Discuss the opportunities of incorporation of machine learning in agriculture. Briefly discuss different machine learning strategies. Briefly discuss the ways of machine learning can be used
Economic analysis of fertilizer options for maize production in Tanzaniaafrica-rising
Poster prepared by Bekele Kotu, Job Kihara, Yangole Luanda, Stephen Lyimo, Mateete Bekunda, Irmgard Hoeschle-Zeledon for the Africa RISING ESA Project Review and Planning Meeting, Lilongwe, Malawi, 3–5 October 2018
Calling for mechanization: farmers’ willingness to pay for small-scale maize ...africa-rising
Poster prepared by Bekele Kotu, Adebayo Abass, Audifas Gaspar, Gundula Fischer, Christopher Mutungi, Irmgard Hoeschle-Zeledon and Mateete Bekunda for the Tropentag 2019: Filling Gaps and Removing Traps for Sustainable Resource Management, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany, 18–20 September 2019
To help reaching the Sustainable Development Goals, CGIAR must tap into Big Data. Within the programme on Climate Change for Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), researchers have already applied Big Data analytics to agricultural and weather records in Colombia, revealing how climate variation impacts rice yields. After defining its Open Data-Open Access strategy, CGIAR has launched an internal call for proposals for big data analytics platforms that will provide services to the Agri-Food system programmes and parners, and will interconnect the CGIAR data to other multi-disciplinary big data. The seminar will present the pespectives of the envisioned platforms.
Insecticide spray regime effect on cowpea yield and financial returns in nort...africa-rising
Poster prepared by Kotu, B., Abdul Rahman, N., Larbi, A., Akakpo, D.B., Asante, M., Mellon, S.B. and Hoeschle-Zeledon, I. for the AfrIca RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March-1 April 2016
Machine Learning in Agriculture Module 1Prasenjit Dey
Discuss the opportunities of incorporation of machine learning in agriculture. Briefly discuss different machine learning strategies. Briefly discuss the ways of machine learning can be used
Economic analysis of fertilizer options for maize production in Tanzaniaafrica-rising
Poster prepared by Bekele Kotu, Job Kihara, Yangole Luanda, Stephen Lyimo, Mateete Bekunda, Irmgard Hoeschle-Zeledon for the Africa RISING ESA Project Review and Planning Meeting, Lilongwe, Malawi, 3–5 October 2018
Calling for mechanization: farmers’ willingness to pay for small-scale maize ...africa-rising
Poster prepared by Bekele Kotu, Adebayo Abass, Audifas Gaspar, Gundula Fischer, Christopher Mutungi, Irmgard Hoeschle-Zeledon and Mateete Bekunda for the Tropentag 2019: Filling Gaps and Removing Traps for Sustainable Resource Management, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany, 18–20 September 2019
To help reaching the Sustainable Development Goals, CGIAR must tap into Big Data. Within the programme on Climate Change for Agriculture and Food Security (CCAFS), researchers have already applied Big Data analytics to agricultural and weather records in Colombia, revealing how climate variation impacts rice yields. After defining its Open Data-Open Access strategy, CGIAR has launched an internal call for proposals for big data analytics platforms that will provide services to the Agri-Food system programmes and parners, and will interconnect the CGIAR data to other multi-disciplinary big data. The seminar will present the pespectives of the envisioned platforms.
Solution space for sustainable intensification in Bougouniafrica-rising
Poster prepared by Mary Ollenburger, Katrien Descheemaeker, Todd Crane and Ken Giller for the AfrIca RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March–1 April 2016
Integrated soil fertility management affect profitability of soybean in north...africa-rising
Poster prepared by Larbi, A., AddulRahman, N., Kotu, B., Hoeschle-Zeledon, I., Akakpo, D.B. and Mellon S.B. for the AfrIca RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March–1 April 2016
Strip cropping effect on yield of maize, cowpea and groundnut in northern Ghanaafrica-rising
Poster prepared by Larbi, A., Addul Rahman, N. and Hoeschle-Zeledon, I. for the AfrIca RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March–1 April 2016
Gary Eilerts
WEBINAR
Using Satellite Imagery for Early Warning of Productivity Constraints
Organized by the Food Security Portal (FSP)
OCT 31, 2019 - 11:00 AM TO 12:30 PM EDT
Author: Khidhir Abbas Hameed
Title: Iraq - Initiatives to Spread the SRI in the Middle East and Central Asia
Presented at: The Workshop to Enhance Cooperation and Sharing among SRI National Networks in Asia
Date: October 18-19, 2018
Venue: Leverage Business Hotel-Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Production Efficiency of small holder Sugarcane Farmers in Swaziland: A Case ...inventionjournals
Instating production efficiency is imperative for increased productivity and profitability in sugarcane production. This study aimed at establishing efficiencies and their relationship with farmers’ socioeconomic characteristics. The study used primary data collected from 147smallholder sugarcane farmers of which 76 were inHhohho (KDDP &Vuvulane) and 71 in Ubombo (Poortzicht& LUSIP). This study estimated farmers’ efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model. The findings of the study revealed that the majority of the farmers interviewed were females (59.2% in Ubombo& 55.3% in Hhohho), with 32.4%(Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 44.7% (KDDP &Vuvulane) of farmers attained secondary education, average mean age of 58 (Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 55 (KDDP &Vuvulane)years, farming experience of 10 (Ubombo&Hhohho, respectively) years, cultivate about 5.9 (Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 3.1 (KDDP &Vuvulane) hectares and obtained95.82 (Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 92.45 (KDDP &Vuvulane) tonnes per hectare per annumofsugarcane.Farmers’ estimated technical efficiency, allocative efficiency and economic efficiency were 90.18%, 85.43% and 77.07%(Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 89%, 84.48% and 75.82% (KDDP &Vuvulane), respectively.The results suggest that farmers can still improve efficiencies by9.82%, 14.57% and 22.93%(Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 11%, 15.52% and 24.18% (KDDP &Vuvulane), respectively without changing the available technologies.Technicalefficiencywas affected byage, irrigation system (10% significant levels), education, experience (1% significant levels), fertilizer (5% significant level) (Poortzicht& LUSIP) andhousehold size (10% significant level), age, ripener, herbicide (5% significant levels), education, occupation and irrigation system (1% significant levels) (KDDP &Vuvulane). Allocative efficiency was influenced bywater, irrigation system (1% significant levels), ripener (10% significant level)(Poortzicht& LUSIP) and education (10% significant level), age, occupation, water, fertilizer, ripener and irrigation system(1% significant levels) (KDDP &Vuvulane). Economic efficiency was affected by education (5% significant level), experience, water, fertilizer, irrigation system (1% significant levels) (Poortzicht&LUSIP) and herbicide (5% significant level) age, education, occupation, water, ripenerand irrigation system (1% significant levels) (KDDP &Vuvulane).The study therefore recommends formulating rural development programmes and policies that target young farmers’ engagement and participation in sugarcane production and consider farmers’ socio-economic factors for increased productivity
Marc Schut presents an overview of Flagship Project 5 'Improved livelihoods at scale' of the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB), during the 18th Triennial Symposium of the International Society of Tropical Roots Crops (ISTRC) in October 2018.
Fulu Tao, Taru Palosuo, Panu Korhonen (Agro-ecosystem modeling )
Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio, Ari Rajala, Kaija Hakala, Lauri Jauhiainen (Agronomy)
Tapio Salo, Elene Valkama (Soil)
Heikki Lehtonen, Xing Liu (Agro-economy)
Perttu Virkajärvi (Physiology)
Alan Schulman (Genetics)
Summer Allen
WEBINAR
Using Satellite Imagery for Early Warning of Productivity Constraints
Organized by the Food Security Portal (FSP)
OCT 31, 2019 - 11:00 AM TO 12:30 PM EDT
The presentation, Smallholder Dairy-Farming in Kenya, was given by Patric Brandt at the 3rd International Global Food Security conference in December 2017 in Cape town, South Africa.
Nitrogen rate and variety effect on profitability of maize production in nort...africa-rising
Poster prepared by Larbi, A., Addul Rahman, N., Kotu, B., Hoeschle-Zeledon, I., Akakpo, D.B. and Mellon S.B. for the AfrIca RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March–1 April 2016
Sustainable intensification indicator framework for Africa RISINGafrica-rising
Presented by Philip Grabowski (Michigan State University), Mark Musumba (Columbia University), Cheryl Palm (University of Florida) and Sieg Snapp (Michigan State University) at the Africa RISING East and Southern Africa Phase II Planning Meeting, Lilongwe, Malawi, 5-8 October 2016
The triennial conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) provides a platform for the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) teams of the CGIAR centers to showcase their work. The first symposium organized by these teams was on ‘Bio-economic modeling to assess options for enhancing food security under climate change in the developing world’ and it took place during the 29th IAAE conference in Brazil in 2012. The teams came again together in 2015 to organize a second symposium on ‘Interpreting results from using bio-economic modeling for global and regional ex ante impact assessment’ at the 30th IAAE conference which took place in Milan on August 8-14, 2015.
Solution space for sustainable intensification in Bougouniafrica-rising
Poster prepared by Mary Ollenburger, Katrien Descheemaeker, Todd Crane and Ken Giller for the AfrIca RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March–1 April 2016
Integrated soil fertility management affect profitability of soybean in north...africa-rising
Poster prepared by Larbi, A., AddulRahman, N., Kotu, B., Hoeschle-Zeledon, I., Akakpo, D.B. and Mellon S.B. for the AfrIca RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March–1 April 2016
Strip cropping effect on yield of maize, cowpea and groundnut in northern Ghanaafrica-rising
Poster prepared by Larbi, A., Addul Rahman, N. and Hoeschle-Zeledon, I. for the AfrIca RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March–1 April 2016
Gary Eilerts
WEBINAR
Using Satellite Imagery for Early Warning of Productivity Constraints
Organized by the Food Security Portal (FSP)
OCT 31, 2019 - 11:00 AM TO 12:30 PM EDT
Author: Khidhir Abbas Hameed
Title: Iraq - Initiatives to Spread the SRI in the Middle East and Central Asia
Presented at: The Workshop to Enhance Cooperation and Sharing among SRI National Networks in Asia
Date: October 18-19, 2018
Venue: Leverage Business Hotel-Skudai, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
Production Efficiency of small holder Sugarcane Farmers in Swaziland: A Case ...inventionjournals
Instating production efficiency is imperative for increased productivity and profitability in sugarcane production. This study aimed at establishing efficiencies and their relationship with farmers’ socioeconomic characteristics. The study used primary data collected from 147smallholder sugarcane farmers of which 76 were inHhohho (KDDP &Vuvulane) and 71 in Ubombo (Poortzicht& LUSIP). This study estimated farmers’ efficiency using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) model. The findings of the study revealed that the majority of the farmers interviewed were females (59.2% in Ubombo& 55.3% in Hhohho), with 32.4%(Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 44.7% (KDDP &Vuvulane) of farmers attained secondary education, average mean age of 58 (Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 55 (KDDP &Vuvulane)years, farming experience of 10 (Ubombo&Hhohho, respectively) years, cultivate about 5.9 (Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 3.1 (KDDP &Vuvulane) hectares and obtained95.82 (Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 92.45 (KDDP &Vuvulane) tonnes per hectare per annumofsugarcane.Farmers’ estimated technical efficiency, allocative efficiency and economic efficiency were 90.18%, 85.43% and 77.07%(Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 89%, 84.48% and 75.82% (KDDP &Vuvulane), respectively.The results suggest that farmers can still improve efficiencies by9.82%, 14.57% and 22.93%(Poortzicht& LUSIP) and 11%, 15.52% and 24.18% (KDDP &Vuvulane), respectively without changing the available technologies.Technicalefficiencywas affected byage, irrigation system (10% significant levels), education, experience (1% significant levels), fertilizer (5% significant level) (Poortzicht& LUSIP) andhousehold size (10% significant level), age, ripener, herbicide (5% significant levels), education, occupation and irrigation system (1% significant levels) (KDDP &Vuvulane). Allocative efficiency was influenced bywater, irrigation system (1% significant levels), ripener (10% significant level)(Poortzicht& LUSIP) and education (10% significant level), age, occupation, water, fertilizer, ripener and irrigation system(1% significant levels) (KDDP &Vuvulane). Economic efficiency was affected by education (5% significant level), experience, water, fertilizer, irrigation system (1% significant levels) (Poortzicht&LUSIP) and herbicide (5% significant level) age, education, occupation, water, ripenerand irrigation system (1% significant levels) (KDDP &Vuvulane).The study therefore recommends formulating rural development programmes and policies that target young farmers’ engagement and participation in sugarcane production and consider farmers’ socio-economic factors for increased productivity
Marc Schut presents an overview of Flagship Project 5 'Improved livelihoods at scale' of the CGIAR Research Program on Roots, Tubers and Bananas (RTB), during the 18th Triennial Symposium of the International Society of Tropical Roots Crops (ISTRC) in October 2018.
Fulu Tao, Taru Palosuo, Panu Korhonen (Agro-ecosystem modeling )
Pirjo Peltonen-Sainio, Ari Rajala, Kaija Hakala, Lauri Jauhiainen (Agronomy)
Tapio Salo, Elene Valkama (Soil)
Heikki Lehtonen, Xing Liu (Agro-economy)
Perttu Virkajärvi (Physiology)
Alan Schulman (Genetics)
Summer Allen
WEBINAR
Using Satellite Imagery for Early Warning of Productivity Constraints
Organized by the Food Security Portal (FSP)
OCT 31, 2019 - 11:00 AM TO 12:30 PM EDT
The presentation, Smallholder Dairy-Farming in Kenya, was given by Patric Brandt at the 3rd International Global Food Security conference in December 2017 in Cape town, South Africa.
Nitrogen rate and variety effect on profitability of maize production in nort...africa-rising
Poster prepared by Larbi, A., Addul Rahman, N., Kotu, B., Hoeschle-Zeledon, I., Akakpo, D.B. and Mellon S.B. for the AfrIca RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 30 March–1 April 2016
Sustainable intensification indicator framework for Africa RISINGafrica-rising
Presented by Philip Grabowski (Michigan State University), Mark Musumba (Columbia University), Cheryl Palm (University of Florida) and Sieg Snapp (Michigan State University) at the Africa RISING East and Southern Africa Phase II Planning Meeting, Lilongwe, Malawi, 5-8 October 2016
The triennial conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) provides a platform for the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) teams of the CGIAR centers to showcase their work. The first symposium organized by these teams was on ‘Bio-economic modeling to assess options for enhancing food security under climate change in the developing world’ and it took place during the 29th IAAE conference in Brazil in 2012. The teams came again together in 2015 to organize a second symposium on ‘Interpreting results from using bio-economic modeling for global and regional ex ante impact assessment’ at the 30th IAAE conference which took place in Milan on August 8-14, 2015.
Introducing the sustainable intensification assessment frameworkafrica-rising
Presented by Mark Musumba, Philip Grabowski, Cheryl Palm and Sieglinde Snapp at the Africa RISING West Africa Review and Planning Meeting, Accra, 1-2 February 2017
Presentation by Osana Bonilla-Findji and Dhanush Dinesh at GACSA’s joint workshop on ‘Metrics for Climate-Smart Agriculture’ in Rome, FAO HQ, 15 June 2017.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
Keith Wiebe
Global Landscapes Forum
IFPRI Session: Informing the policymaking landscape: From research to action in the fight against climate change and hunger
Marrakech, Morocco
November 16, 2016
Climate change and food systems: Global modeling to inform decision makingCIFOR-ICRAF
Presentation given by Keith Wiebe, Senior Research Fellow in the Environment and Production Technology Division of the International Food Policy Research Institute, at the Global Landscapes Forum on 16 November 2016 in Marrakesh, Morocco.
http://www.landscapes.org/
ICRISAT Global Planning Meeting 2019:Research Program - Innovation Systems fo...ICRISAT
The Global Planning Meeting 2019 focused on an innovation systems approach harnesses the conditions needed to create demand for technologies and creates the knowledge that may be used to bring about such changes…innovations most often emerge from a systems of actors collaborating, communicating and learning, methodologies and tools to create innovations, understand entry points/tradeoffs and leverage actors towards profitable resilient and sustainable agri-food systems at scale and work together to contribute to ICRISAT’s mission.
Poster presented at CSA Conference 2015 in Montpellier by Marieke Veeger and Joost Vervoort.
Read more about the conference: http://ccafs.cgiar.org/3rd-global-science-conference-%E2%80%9Cclimate-smart-agriculture-2015%E2%80%9D#.
Similar to 6 icrisat progress 2015 gfsf extended team meeting-rome 25-28 may (20)
Presentation for the International Grains Forum (www.igc.int/en/about/aboutus-pressrelease.aspx, www.igcargentina.com/eng/index.html)
https://globalfutures.cgiar.org/2015/12/20/to-latin-america-for-global-connections
Presentation for the second annual International Conference on Agro-Industrial Projections hosted by INAI (www.inai.org.ar, www.inai.org.ar/notas.asp?id=193) in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
https://globalfutures.cgiar.org/2015/12/20/to-latin-america-for-global-connections
The triennial conference of the International Association of Agricultural Economists (IAAE) provides a platform for the Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) teams of the CGIAR centers to showcase their work. The first symposium organized by these teams was on ‘Bio-economic modeling to assess options for enhancing food security under climate change in the developing world’ and it took place during the 29th IAAE conference in Brazil in 2012. The teams came again together in 2015 to organize a second symposium on ‘Interpreting results from using bio-economic modeling for global and regional ex ante impact assessment’ at the 30th IAAE conference which took place in Milan on August 8-14, 2015.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
The Global Futures and Strategic Foresight (GFSF) team met in Rome from May 25-28, 2015 to review progress towards current work plans, discuss model improvements and technical parameters, and consider possible contributions by the GFSF program to the CRP Phase II planning process. All 15 CGIAR Centers were represented at the meeting.
ZGB - The Role of Generative AI in Government transformation.pdfSaeed Al Dhaheri
This keynote was presented during the the 7th edition of the UAE Hackathon 2024. It highlights the role of AI and Generative AI in addressing government transformation to achieve zero government bureaucracy
This session provides a comprehensive overview of the latest updates to the Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards (commonly known as the Uniform Guidance) outlined in the 2 CFR 200.
With a focus on the 2024 revisions issued by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB), participants will gain insight into the key changes affecting federal grant recipients. The session will delve into critical regulatory updates, providing attendees with the knowledge and tools necessary to navigate and comply with the evolving landscape of federal grant management.
Learning Objectives:
- Understand the rationale behind the 2024 updates to the Uniform Guidance outlined in 2 CFR 200, and their implications for federal grant recipients.
- Identify the key changes and revisions introduced by the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) in the 2024 edition of 2 CFR 200.
- Gain proficiency in applying the updated regulations to ensure compliance with federal grant requirements and avoid potential audit findings.
- Develop strategies for effectively implementing the new guidelines within the grant management processes of their respective organizations, fostering efficiency and accountability in federal grant administration.
Presentation by Jared Jageler, David Adler, Noelia Duchovny, and Evan Herrnstadt, analysts in CBO’s Microeconomic Studies and Health Analysis Divisions, at the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists Summer Conference.
Russian anarchist and anti-war movement in the third year of full-scale warAntti Rautiainen
Anarchist group ANA Regensburg hosted my online-presentation on 16th of May 2024, in which I discussed tactics of anti-war activism in Russia, and reasons why the anti-war movement has not been able to make an impact to change the course of events yet. Cases of anarchists repressed for anti-war activities are presented, as well as strategies of support for political prisoners, and modest successes in supporting their struggles.
Thumbnail picture is by MediaZona, you may read their report on anti-war arson attacks in Russia here: https://en.zona.media/article/2022/10/13/burn-map
Links:
Autonomous Action
http://Avtonom.org
Anarchist Black Cross Moscow
http://Avtonom.org/abc
Solidarity Zone
https://t.me/solidarity_zone
Memorial
https://memopzk.org/, https://t.me/pzk_memorial
OVD-Info
https://en.ovdinfo.org/antiwar-ovd-info-guide
RosUznik
https://rosuznik.org/
Uznik Online
http://uznikonline.tilda.ws/
Russian Reader
https://therussianreader.com/
ABC Irkutsk
https://abc38.noblogs.org/
Send mail to prisoners from abroad:
http://Prisonmail.online
YouTube: https://youtu.be/c5nSOdU48O8
Spotify: https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/libertarianlifecoach/episodes/Russian-anarchist-and-anti-war-movement-in-the-third-year-of-full-scale-war-e2k8ai4
Understanding the Challenges of Street ChildrenSERUDS INDIA
By raising awareness, providing support, advocating for change, and offering assistance to children in need, individuals can play a crucial role in improving the lives of street children and helping them realize their full potential
Donate Us
https://serudsindia.org/how-individuals-can-support-street-children-in-india/
#donatefororphan, #donateforhomelesschildren, #childeducation, #ngochildeducation, #donateforeducation, #donationforchildeducation, #sponsorforpoorchild, #sponsororphanage #sponsororphanchild, #donation, #education, #charity, #educationforchild, #seruds, #kurnool, #joyhome
Jennifer Schaus and Associates hosts a complimentary webinar series on The FAR in 2024. Join the webinars on Wednesdays and Fridays at noon, eastern.
Recordings are on YouTube and the company website.
https://www.youtube.com/@jenniferschaus/videos
What is the point of small housing associations.pptxPaul Smith
Given the small scale of housing associations and their relative high cost per home what is the point of them and how do we justify their continued existance
Up the Ratios Bylaws - a Comprehensive Process of Our Organizationuptheratios
Up the Ratios is a non-profit organization dedicated to bridging the gap in STEM education for underprivileged students by providing free, high-quality learning opportunities in robotics and other STEM fields. Our mission is to empower the next generation of innovators, thinkers, and problem-solvers by offering a range of educational programs that foster curiosity, creativity, and critical thinking.
At Up the Ratios, we believe that every student, regardless of their socio-economic background, should have access to the tools and knowledge needed to succeed in today's technology-driven world. To achieve this, we host a variety of free classes, workshops, summer camps, and live lectures tailored to students from underserved communities. Our programs are designed to be engaging and hands-on, allowing students to explore the exciting world of robotics and STEM through practical, real-world applications.
Our free classes cover fundamental concepts in robotics, coding, and engineering, providing students with a strong foundation in these critical areas. Through our interactive workshops, students can dive deeper into specific topics, working on projects that challenge them to apply what they've learned and think creatively. Our summer camps offer an immersive experience where students can collaborate on larger projects, develop their teamwork skills, and gain confidence in their abilities.
In addition to our local programs, Up the Ratios is committed to making a global impact. We take donations of new and gently used robotics parts, which we then distribute to students and educational institutions in other countries. These donations help ensure that young learners worldwide have the resources they need to explore and excel in STEM fields. By supporting education in this way, we aim to nurture a global community of future leaders and innovators.
Our live lectures feature guest speakers from various STEM disciplines, including engineers, scientists, and industry professionals who share their knowledge and experiences with our students. These lectures provide valuable insights into potential career paths and inspire students to pursue their passions in STEM.
Up the Ratios relies on the generosity of donors and volunteers to continue our work. Contributions of time, expertise, and financial support are crucial to sustaining our programs and expanding our reach. Whether you're an individual passionate about education, a professional in the STEM field, or a company looking to give back to the community, there are many ways to get involved and make a difference.
We are proud of the positive impact we've had on the lives of countless students, many of whom have gone on to pursue higher education and careers in STEM. By providing these young minds with the tools and opportunities they need to succeed, we are not only changing their futures but also contributing to the advancement of technology and innovation on a broader scale.
Canadian Immigration Tracker March 2024 - Key SlidesAndrew Griffith
Highlights
Permanent Residents decrease along with percentage of TR2PR decline to 52 percent of all Permanent Residents.
March asylum claim data not issued as of May 27 (unusually late). Irregular arrivals remain very small.
Study permit applications experiencing sharp decrease as a result of announced caps over 50 percent compared to February.
Citizenship numbers remain stable.
Slide 3 has the overall numbers and change.
6 icrisat progress 2015 gfsf extended team meeting-rome 25-28 may
1. Global Futures and Strategic
Foresight @ ICRISAT
Progress update of 2015 deliverables
S Nedumaran
Research Program – Markets, Institutions ad Policies
ICRISAT | India
26 May 2015
2. ICRISAT is one among 5 CG center
started GFP
Multidisciplinary team created
and institutionalized (14 member
team)
Supporting priority setting,
foresight and scenarios analysis
for CRP DC and GL
Collaboration with other CRPs and
Global Projects like AgMIP (data
sharing, model enhancement,
capacity building)
Global Futures and Strategic
Foresight @ ICRISAT
Multi-disciplinary team @ ICRISAT
3. Achievements in GFSF @ ICRISAT
Crop model improvement completed – Sorghum, Groundnut and
Chickpeas
Abiotic stress tolerant virtual cultivars evaluated for Sorghum and
Groundnuts
Technology reports for ICRISAT mandate crops
Contributed to CRP GL and DC priority setting and justifying country
focus
Contributed subnational level data for SPAM model improvement
Capacity building:
1 training program on foresight model and its application for ESA
economists
1 DSSAT crop model training conducted for CG and NARS partners
4. Publications:
• 5 Journal articles (ISI journal)
• 1 Book Chapter
• 3 ICRISAT working/discussion paper
Data/tools management
• Populating the Dataverse with socio-economic
and experimental data -
http://dataverse.icrisat.org/
• Spatial Tool: http://spatial-tools.icrisat.ac.in/
6. Millets disaggregation IMPACT
SPAM (2005) used to estimate the production share of
pearl millets and small millets (other millets)
Validating the production shares – with national statistics
and experts knowledge
7. Modification of the CERES-Pearl millet
model
Model deficiencies in the default version:
Did not simulate heat tolerance of pearl millet,
i.e., changes in seed set at high temperatures
Underestimated yields at low plant density or
wider row-spacing
Underestimated leaf area index of tillers
Overestimated yield loss when drought stressed
during panicle initiation to flowering or during
flowering to seed-filling stages
Overestimated harvest index under extended
day length conditions
8. Relationship of seed set with mean air
temperature in pearl millet
Source: Gupta et al. (2015)
9. Code and parameter changes in the model
All relationships determining heat tolerance in millet incorporated
Model code changed for better estimation of light extinction
coefficient (LIFAC) to improve model response to plant population
and row spacing
An additional genetic coefficient (GT) was added and other related
changes made to improve LAI response of tillers
Effect of water stress on daily panicle growth (GROPAN) and panicle
weight (PANWT) reduced by excluding TURFAC (turgor factor) in the
GROPAN equation
Effect of day-length on harvest index still needs to be attempted
Collaborating with CRP DC in conducting field experiments
Collaborate with UF and DSSAT foundation (USAID-ICRISAT Linkage fund)
12. Spatial crop modeling – Case
Studies
Case study:1 – Groundnut, India
Used well calibrated groundnut cultivars
Sowing window, fertilizer inputs across
location using experts opinion
Needs to develop better soil profile raster
for improving the simulations
14. Groundnut yield masked
to crop area
Remote sensing data was used to
develop the crop area extends
Clip the yields to that pixel
Crop extend maps can be used to
update the SPAM maps
15. Work in progress in spatial crop
modeling in 2015
Crop type masking for all ICRISAT mandate crops for
South Asia was completed (Gumma et al.,)
Integrated assessment of climate change impacts and
various NRM interventions will be studied for South Asia
for groundnut and chickpea
Improvements in the global-scale crop modeling
simulations by providing better inputs –case study
groundnut (sowing window/soil etc.,)
16. Estimating total welfare benefits (direct and spillover)
using Single-multi market Economic surplus model
To assess the spillover potential of technologies to
inform decision making
Research domains for 5 ICRISAT mandate crops completed
Modified version of excel based ACIAR spillover model was
developed
Estimation of welfare benefits for 5 crops completed
A proposal was submitted to CABI to publish a edited book
Title: DECISION SUPPORT FOR INTERNATIONAL
AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH: Linking Impact and Spillover
Assessments to Priority Setting
18. Welfare benefits for Millets – Real world vs
Ideal world (US$ M)
776.3 Million
IRR – 17.7%
Nedumaran et al., 2013
19. Integrating gender and nutrition in
foresight modeling
Identification and compilation of database from various sources -
national, sub-national, micro-level
1. BMI - percentage of population by gender, rural & urban level, age cohort for Southeast Asia and African
regions
2. Nutritional status of children 0-5 years for Southern Asia, Sub-Saharan Africa, Northern Africa and Western
Asia regions
3. % of children malnourished - who are exclusively breastfed, breastfed with complementary food, still
breastfeeding, at country level
4. % of population below international poverty line of US$1.25 per day, % of central government expenditure
(1997–2006*) allocated to health and education (India)
5. Data on women education, contraceptive prevalence and Antenatal care, delivery care coverage , maternal
mortality ratio from 2000-2007 (India)
6. % of children underweight by gender, rural ,urban and income level for all regions of the world. (Source:
UNICEF)
7. NFHS and NSSO – India
8. DHS – Global download and compilation in progress
9. Data on sanitation indicators
20. 2. Next step - Developing an index
Developing a composite index to be used in the foresight model
• Computing WEAI – for 3 states in India
• Developing a index for nutritional status for boys, girls, men and women
• Linking Sanitation indicators to nutrition status – micro level, national level
(India and Bangladesh)
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
90.00
100.00
110.00
Mahbubnagar Akola Solapur
Percentageofchildrenunderfiveyearsofage
Nutritional status of children under five years of age using
Height for age (stunting) indicator, 2013-2014
Severe Stunting (< median -3SD)
Moderate Stunting (< median -2SD to >= median -3SD)
Normal (>= median -2SD)
21. DSSAT training – Completed (March, 2015)
Gridded spatial crop model training (Jan 2015 and follow up April 2015)
Spatial Tool: http://spatial-tools.icrisat.ac.in/
Publication:
1 Journal article published in 2015 (ISI journal)
2 working paper (under review)
Capacity Building, data tools and
Publication
Start with realistic scenario (green – given current adaptive capacity and adoption levels
Significant benefits in Asia and WCA: should continue with ICRISAT PM research – global research benefits including spillovers (green levels).
Past spillovers to ESA (ex-post assessment) have already vanished? SMIP impact not sustained (down to 10m)?
Huge cost of training and extension: to enable capacity building: from .2 to 1; and Adoption constrained: .3 to 1)
To achieve the Ideal World estimate, we need enough funds to increase adaptive capacity from .2 to 1 ; and enough funds to take adoption from 30% to 100%. Calculate very high cost. Reckon how AGRA investment and Seed Systems investment is enough (consider risk – governance factor).
With uncertainty scenario in Africa, must analyze the implication of the benefit levels represented by green bars:
Total benefits = $776m = US$260 m in WCA and US$507m in Asia; and 10m in ESA.
How do we increase this benefit levels?
Unit cost reduction (k) through strategic research; b. improve adaptive capacity (Pa); c. improve adoption (x)
Need to reckon the cost of achieving each step:
Cost of achieving 10% unit cost reduction (to produce green bar) compared with
To achieve red bar, how much will it cost to elevate adaptive capacity levels from present level of .2 to max of 1? MASSIVE - AGRA
To achieve blue bar, how much will it cost to elevate adoption from present level of .3 to max of 1? MASSIVE (ICRISAT contributing through seed systems; but only a small part)
Real significant contribution is through research impacts -
a. What are the tradeoffs?
Total global benefits including spillover is $776m: US$260 m benefits (green) welfare gains in WCA and almost double (US$507m) in Asia.
Talk about the cost of achieving the “blues”; with high uncertainty!
Talk about ‘k’ – research breakthroughs
How do we balance research to achieve the required breakthroughs:
big k shift through innovative research (focus of Asia given fixed infrastructure and high probability of achieving breakthroughs through good partnership in Asia)
Strategic approach in catalyzing capacity building through south-south cooperation (bridge – broker – catalyst)
Strategic approach through ARIs, other IARCS and private sector
Strategic implication – establish critical mass in PM research in WCA to harness the max potential – on condition (limitation/caveat) that the adaptive and adoption constraints are addressed e.g. seed systems, capacity building, infrastructure, policy and governance
Research emphasis on PM in WCA with target PE: PE 1,2,3
Harness strategic research in Asia (Fixed costs effect) to generate significant ‘k’ – breakthroughs