This document discusses strategies for improving city street plinths and public spaces. It proposes that true sustainability involves creating an adaptable and mixed city that is loved and owned by the public. The document outlines criteria for successful street plinths and public spaces based on input from over 90 international co-authors. It emphasizes the importance of pedestrian experience, placemaking, flexibility and a long term strategic vision to create vibrant public realms. International case studies and lessons learned are shared to help cities develop strategies to improve street plinths and public spaces.
6. International learning community
Strategies for the City at Eye Level
85 co-authors, open source
35 cases internationally
Criteria & 101 lessons for good
plinths
Methods for planning, users, property,
management, revitalizing
7.
8.
9. 90 Co-authors w Elijah Agevi w Mishkat Ahmed-Raja w Cecilia Andersson w Hans
Appelboom w Emiel Arends w Frank van Beek w Frank Belderbos w Rogier van den
Berg w Emily Berwyn w Willemijn de Boer w Nick Broad w Alessandra Cianchetta w
Jose Chong w Mikael Colville-Andersen w Ciaran Cuffe w Richard Dobson w Vivian
Doumpa w René Dutrieux w Paul Elleswijk w Gábor Everraert w Jos Gadet w Adriaan
Geuze w Jan Gehl w Meredith Glaser w Arjan Gooijer w Peter Groenendaal w Sander
van der Ham w Samar Héchaimé w Jeniffer Heemann w Mattijs van ’t Hoff w Paolo
Horn Regal w Nel de Jager w Jeroen Jansen w Max Jeleniewski w Lotte Johansen
Kaefer w Birgit Jürgenhake w Tanja Karg w Hans Karssenberg w Fred Kent w Berry
Kessels w Joep Klabbers w Martin Knuijt w Lars Korn w Willem van Laar w Tine van
Langelaar w Jeroen Laven w Willie Macrae w Kathy Madden w Camilla Meier w
Thomas Melin w Norman Mintz w Eri Mitsostergiou w Thaddeus Muller w Peter
Nieland w Renee Nycolaas w Kris Opbroek w Henk Ovink w Francisco Pailliè Pérez w
Gerard Peet w Laura Petrella w Elizabeth Peyroux w Levente Polyák w Stefanie Raab
w Solvejg Reigstad w Marlies Rohmer w Anna Robinson w Ben Ruse w Petra Rutten w
Wies Sanders w Ton Schaap w Lai Shouhua w Filip Smits w Alexander Stahle w
Stefan van der Spek w Jan van Teeffelen w Wouter Tooren w Marat Troina w Eric van
Ulden w Gert Jan te Velde w Mark van de Velde w Tasmi Quazi w Klaas Waarheid w
Robin von Weiler w Kees Went w Jouke van der Werf w Tony Wijntuin w John
Worthington w Xu Yunfei w Arin van Zee w Kim Zweerink
56. “The street plinth may be only
10% of a building,
it determines 90% of the
experience.”
57. Developer: short term profit focus
Cities“pavement focus
Building owner:“single tenant focus”
Users:“shut out street, blinds, fear”
Architects:“building focus
WHY GOOD PLINTHS
ARE
NOT SELF-EVIDENT?
58. Hybride zones
HOW WE CAN GET IT
RIGHT
Developer: longer term value focus
Cities“city at eye level focus
Building owner:“multi tenant focus”
Users:“connect with the street, hybrid zone”
Architects:“street focus
59. Los Angeles “Great Streets
Toolbox”
Chicago “Complete Streets”
Toronto “Pedestrian Strategy”
Dublin “Your City Your Space,
Public Realm Strategy”
Paris “La Rue en Partage”
Stockholm “Walkable City”
Rotterdam “Plinth Strategy”
UN Habitat “Streets as Places”
61. Good buildings:
1. Many units 4-10 m, variety functions and reasons to visit
2. Veranda feeling, rich material, vertical orientation, not too much glass
3. Flexibility, plinth height > 4m, flexible land use plan
4. Good hybrid zone, transition private to public
Good streets:
1. Coalitions / street management
2. Green, density, clear entrances, wayfinding
3. Pleasure to walk in, balance car-pedestrians, comfort (wind, sun, sound,
sitting)
4. Definition: height > half width, congruent street sides, tree canopy
Good contex:
1. Analyze the Pedestrian flows
2. Long term strategy and active partners
3. Analyze the position in the urban fabric: history, fine grid, networks
4. Public realm: connections to parks and plazas
CRITERIA FOR GREAT ‘PLINTHS’:
THREE LEVELS
62. Good buildings:
1. Many units 4-10 m, variety functions and reasons to visit
2. Veranda feeling, rich material, vertical orientation, not too much glass
3. Flexibility, plinth height > 4m, flexible land use plan
4. Good hybrid zone, transition private to public
Good streets:
1. Coalitions / street management
2. Green, density, clear entrances, wayfinding
3. Pleasure to walk in, balance car-pedestrians, comfort (wind, sun, sound,
sitting)
4. Definition: height > half width, congruent street sides, tree canopy
Good contex:
1. Analyze the Pedestrian flows
2. Long term strategy and active partners
3. Analyze the position in the urban fabric: history, fine grid, networks
4. Public realm: connections to parks and plazas
CRITERIA FOR GREAT ‘PLINTHS’:
THREE LEVELS
63. Good buildings:
1. Many units 4-10 m, variety functions and reasons to visit
2. Veranda feeling, rich material, vertical orientation, not too much glass
3. Flexibility, plinth height > 4m, flexible land use plan
4. Good hybrid zone, transition private to public
Good streets:
1. Coalitions / street management
2. Green, density, clear entrances, wayfinding
3. Pleasure to walk in, balance car-pedestrians, comfort (wind, sun, sound,
sitting)
4. Definition: height > half width, congruent street sides, tree canopy
Good contex:
1. Analyze the Pedestrian flows
2. Long term strategy and active partners
3. Analyze the position in the urban fabric: history, fine grid, networks
4. Public realm: connections to parks and plazas
CRITERIA FOR GREAT ‘PLINTHS’:
THREE LEVELS
64. Good buildings:
1. Many units 4-10 m, variety functions and reasons to visit
2. Veranda feeling, rich material, vertical orientation, not too much glass
3. Flexibility, plinth height > 4m, flexible land use plan
4. Good hybrid zone, transition private to public
Good streets:
1. Coalitions / street management
2. Green, density, clear entrances, wayfinding
3. Pleasure to walk in, balance car-pedestrians, comfort (wind, sun, sound,
sitting)
4. Definition: height > half width, congruent street sides, tree canopy
Good contex:
1. Analyze the Pedestrian flows
2. Long term strategy and active partners
3. Analyze the position in the urban fabric: history, fine grid, networks
4. Public realm: connections to parks and plazas
CRITERIA FOR GREAT ‘PLINTHS’:
THREE LEVELS
65. SOFTWARE
Pedestrian Flows
Quality of shops, cafes, culture
Experience
ORGWARE
Tools
Portfolio Management
Street Coalitions
HARDWARE
Building
Street
Hybrid Zone
66. STREET
WORKSHOPS
“PLINTH STRATEGY IS MUCH MORE
THAN JUST FILLING AN EMPTY SPACE.
IT’S ABOUT DEVELOPING
A STRATEGY THAT IS BASED ON CO-
CREATION, FLEXIBILITY, CREATIVITY,
PLACEMAKING,