Understand how effective audits bring Maintenance Management theories into real world
practice on a daily basis in your plant, with your Leaders, Planners, and Craftsmen.
Learn how to determine the root-cause of Maintenance Business Process problems, and
how to shed light on facts that support a need for change.
Understand how effective audits bring Maintenance Management theories into real world
practice on a daily basis in your plant, with your Leaders, Planners, and Craftsmen.
Learn how to determine the root-cause of Maintenance Business Process problems, and
how to shed light on facts that support a need for change.
Reliability-Centered Maintenance. An introduction to by JBMmartinjib
Reliability is of a great interest for me because I studied it during my MSc. of Eng. and because I do believe in it: "a reliable asset is a safe asset"...
One of the many ways to improve the reliability of an asset is to implement a Reliability-Centered Maintainance.
This presentation outlines the processes and benefits of applying enhanced maintenance planning techniques such as Reliability Centred Maintenance at your place of work. Please go to www.simenergy.co.uk for more information.
This is a three parts lecture series. The parts will cover the basics and fundamentals of reliability engineering. Part 1 begins with introduction of reliability definition and other reliability characteristics and measurements. It will be followed by reliability calculation, estimation of failure rates and understanding of the implications of failure rates on system maintenance and replacements in Part 2. Then Part 3 will cover the most important and practical failure time distributions and how to obtain the parameters of the distributions and interpretations of these parameters. Hands-on computations of the failure rates and the estimation of the failure time distribution parameters will be conducted using standard Microsoft Excel.
Part 2. Reliability Calculations
1.Use of failure data
2.Density functions
3.Reliability function
4.Hazard and failure rates
This is a three parts lecture series. The parts will cover the basics and fundamentals of reliability engineering. Part 1 begins with introduction of reliability definition and other reliability characteristics and measurements. It will be followed by reliability calculation, estimation of failure rates and understanding of the implications of failure rates on system maintenance and replacements in Part 2. Then Part 3 will cover the most important and practical failure time distributions and how to obtain the parameters of the distributions and interpretations of these parameters. Hands-on computations of the failure rates and the estimation of the failure time distribution parameters will be conducted using standard Microsoft Excel.
Part 3. Failure Time Distributions
1.Constant failure rate distributions
2.Increasing failure rate distributions
3.Decreasing failure rate distributions
4.Weibull Analysis – Why use Weibull?
This is a three parts lecture series. The parts will cover the basics and fundamentals of reliability engineering. Part 1 begins with introduction of reliability definition and other reliability characteristics and measurements. It will be followed by reliability calculation, estimation of failure rates and understanding of the implications of failure rates on system maintenance and replacements in Part 2. Then Part 3 will cover the most important and practical failure time distributions and how to obtain the parameters of the distributions and interpretations of these parameters. Hands-on computations of the failure rates and the estimation of the failure time distribution parameters will be conducted using standard Microsoft Excel.
Part 1. Reliability Definitions
1.Reliability---Time dependent characteristic
2.Failure rate
3.Mean Time to Failure
4.Availability
5.Mean residual life
This seminar session provides an overview of major aspects of reliability engineering, including general introduction of reliability engineering (definition of reliability, function of reliability engineering, a brief history of reliability, etc.), reliability basics (metrics used in reliability, commonly-used probability distributions in reliability, bathtub curve, reliability demonstration test planning, confidence intervals, Bayesian statistics application in reliability, strength-stress interference theory, etc.), accelerated life testing (ALT) (types of ALT, Arrhenius model, inverse power law model, Eyring model, temperature-humidity model, etc.), reliability growth (reliability-based growth models, MTBF-based growth model, etc.), systems reliability & availability (reliability block diagram, non-repairable or repairable systems, reliability modeling of series systems, parallel systems, standby systems, and complex systems, load sharing reliability, reliability allocation, system availability, Monte Carlo simulation, etc.), and degradation-based reliability (introduction of degradation-based reliability, difference between traditional reliability and degradation-based reliability, etc.).
When working for Petrobras at PRSI (Pasadena Refining System Inc.) I had this opportunity to share my experience as a Maintenance Manager in Brazil with PRSI operators and maintenance crew.
Authors: (i) Prashanth Lakshmi Narasimhan,
(ii) Mukesh Ravichandran
Industry: Automobile -Auto Ancillary Equipment ( Turbocharger)
This was presented after the completion of our 2 months internship at Turbo Energy Limited during our 3rd Year Summer holidays (2013)
Backlog, Deferred Maintenance and its use in PlanningSightlines
Gina Matsoukas presents on putting a process in place that will help you turn granular details of your backlog of needs into a strategic action plan for your campus.
Brian Yolitz, MnSCU Associate Vice Chancellor of Facilities
This presentation will focus on and answer questions about the MnSCU system’s legislative capital bonding request.
"Financial Sustainability: Creating a University of the 21st Century." A presentation by UC Davis Vice Chancellor and Chief Financial Officer, Dave Lawlor.
Diverse Perspectives on Managing Facilities DemandsSightlines
Aging campus buildings; growing deferred maintenance; less capital funding; more debt – this is what campus leaders are predicting. While all campuses face challenges, the diversity in facilities needs and investment capacity vary from institution to institution. There is no single solution, but campuses that use performance metrics to diagnose their needs are developing strategies to meet their capital needs and improve operating effectiveness. A panel of senior Business Officers from three highly diverse campuses will demonstrate how they use data, analysis, and modeling to meet facility and financial challenges now and in the future.
Reliability-Centered Maintenance. An introduction to by JBMmartinjib
Reliability is of a great interest for me because I studied it during my MSc. of Eng. and because I do believe in it: "a reliable asset is a safe asset"...
One of the many ways to improve the reliability of an asset is to implement a Reliability-Centered Maintainance.
This presentation outlines the processes and benefits of applying enhanced maintenance planning techniques such as Reliability Centred Maintenance at your place of work. Please go to www.simenergy.co.uk for more information.
This is a three parts lecture series. The parts will cover the basics and fundamentals of reliability engineering. Part 1 begins with introduction of reliability definition and other reliability characteristics and measurements. It will be followed by reliability calculation, estimation of failure rates and understanding of the implications of failure rates on system maintenance and replacements in Part 2. Then Part 3 will cover the most important and practical failure time distributions and how to obtain the parameters of the distributions and interpretations of these parameters. Hands-on computations of the failure rates and the estimation of the failure time distribution parameters will be conducted using standard Microsoft Excel.
Part 2. Reliability Calculations
1.Use of failure data
2.Density functions
3.Reliability function
4.Hazard and failure rates
This is a three parts lecture series. The parts will cover the basics and fundamentals of reliability engineering. Part 1 begins with introduction of reliability definition and other reliability characteristics and measurements. It will be followed by reliability calculation, estimation of failure rates and understanding of the implications of failure rates on system maintenance and replacements in Part 2. Then Part 3 will cover the most important and practical failure time distributions and how to obtain the parameters of the distributions and interpretations of these parameters. Hands-on computations of the failure rates and the estimation of the failure time distribution parameters will be conducted using standard Microsoft Excel.
Part 3. Failure Time Distributions
1.Constant failure rate distributions
2.Increasing failure rate distributions
3.Decreasing failure rate distributions
4.Weibull Analysis – Why use Weibull?
This is a three parts lecture series. The parts will cover the basics and fundamentals of reliability engineering. Part 1 begins with introduction of reliability definition and other reliability characteristics and measurements. It will be followed by reliability calculation, estimation of failure rates and understanding of the implications of failure rates on system maintenance and replacements in Part 2. Then Part 3 will cover the most important and practical failure time distributions and how to obtain the parameters of the distributions and interpretations of these parameters. Hands-on computations of the failure rates and the estimation of the failure time distribution parameters will be conducted using standard Microsoft Excel.
Part 1. Reliability Definitions
1.Reliability---Time dependent characteristic
2.Failure rate
3.Mean Time to Failure
4.Availability
5.Mean residual life
This seminar session provides an overview of major aspects of reliability engineering, including general introduction of reliability engineering (definition of reliability, function of reliability engineering, a brief history of reliability, etc.), reliability basics (metrics used in reliability, commonly-used probability distributions in reliability, bathtub curve, reliability demonstration test planning, confidence intervals, Bayesian statistics application in reliability, strength-stress interference theory, etc.), accelerated life testing (ALT) (types of ALT, Arrhenius model, inverse power law model, Eyring model, temperature-humidity model, etc.), reliability growth (reliability-based growth models, MTBF-based growth model, etc.), systems reliability & availability (reliability block diagram, non-repairable or repairable systems, reliability modeling of series systems, parallel systems, standby systems, and complex systems, load sharing reliability, reliability allocation, system availability, Monte Carlo simulation, etc.), and degradation-based reliability (introduction of degradation-based reliability, difference between traditional reliability and degradation-based reliability, etc.).
When working for Petrobras at PRSI (Pasadena Refining System Inc.) I had this opportunity to share my experience as a Maintenance Manager in Brazil with PRSI operators and maintenance crew.
Authors: (i) Prashanth Lakshmi Narasimhan,
(ii) Mukesh Ravichandran
Industry: Automobile -Auto Ancillary Equipment ( Turbocharger)
This was presented after the completion of our 2 months internship at Turbo Energy Limited during our 3rd Year Summer holidays (2013)
Backlog, Deferred Maintenance and its use in PlanningSightlines
Gina Matsoukas presents on putting a process in place that will help you turn granular details of your backlog of needs into a strategic action plan for your campus.
Brian Yolitz, MnSCU Associate Vice Chancellor of Facilities
This presentation will focus on and answer questions about the MnSCU system’s legislative capital bonding request.
"Financial Sustainability: Creating a University of the 21st Century." A presentation by UC Davis Vice Chancellor and Chief Financial Officer, Dave Lawlor.
Diverse Perspectives on Managing Facilities DemandsSightlines
Aging campus buildings; growing deferred maintenance; less capital funding; more debt – this is what campus leaders are predicting. While all campuses face challenges, the diversity in facilities needs and investment capacity vary from institution to institution. There is no single solution, but campuses that use performance metrics to diagnose their needs are developing strategies to meet their capital needs and improve operating effectiveness. A panel of senior Business Officers from three highly diverse campuses will demonstrate how they use data, analysis, and modeling to meet facility and financial challenges now and in the future.
University of Tennessee Knoxville Facilities Exposed - The Story Behind the F...Sightlines
Come take a look behind the orange curtain as UTK tells their facilities story. With a new university plan to become a Top 25 Research Institution the facilities organization is faced with the incredible challenge: show that facilities service can lead the University’s drive to top 25. This shifts the discussion about facilities from being a cost center that should be minimized to being a key contributor in creating an outstanding student and faculty experience.
With so much change forthcoming where would you start? For the facilities organization it begins with a little introspection. In order to build a house you must begin with a good foundation. Over the last 2 years, the facilities services group at the University of Tennessee has undergone a reorganization designed to achieve 3 core goals:
Target resources to shift from a reactive to proactive maintenance department;
Align resources to improve customer service;
Preserve the strengths of their current facilities service team.
A critical step to creating buy in from senior leadership for these changes was to show that facilities service knew where their strengths and opportunities were and that they had a plan. Together with Sightlines, UTK has utilized data and benchmarking to establish a baseline from which they can evaluate their successes and target future areas.
University of Tennessee, Knoxville will demonstrate how these baselines were created, what they are, and how they are being used to engage campus leaders to make the case for appropriate resource allocation.
Unleash the Power of Prediction with ROPA+Sightlines
With today's capital and operating budget pressures, effectively communicating past success is important, but to continue to thrive, you must be able to look into the future.
What if you had the tools to...
Forecast life cycles, capital needs, and facilities risks?
Create operational and investment goals and continually track performance?
Re-balance your facility strategy and make mid-course corrections to become a "Best in Class" performer?
To give you these tools, Sightlines proudly introduces the next evolution of our facilities benchmarking and analysis service: ROPA+
Making the Case for Future Facilities Funding_CAPPA 2015Sightlines
This session explores how The University of Arkansas was able to create a 15-year Facility Renewal & Stewardship Plan to address their keep-up and catch-up costs while planning for the future despite previously struggling to develop a cohesive strategy to address their alarming growth of deferred maintenance, which totaled approximately $245 million. With a sound project selection process in place and an innovative, yet modest, student facilities fee, The University of Arkansas has prevented the accumulation of additional deferral, while also reducing the backlog by over $75 million.
This session features Mike Johnson, Associate Vice Chancellor for Facilities at The University of Arkansas, and Matt Bausher, Senior Director of Member Services at Sightlines.
New strategies for attacking deferred maintenance december 2012Sightlines
Learn how national data trends show campus buildings are aging and campus backlogs are growing. And, that these trends will accelerate over the next ten years as building constructed in the 1960's turn 50 years old and capital funding from all sources continue to be limited.
Furthermore, learn how the partnership between Sightlines, LLC and University of Massachusetts - Amherst that began in 2005 resulted in more refined documented building conditions, creation of portfolios of projects, and engaged campus leadership in a priority setting process to reach consensus on a multi-year capital plan through the Integrated Facilities Planning process.
How UMass is reducing its deferred maintenance backlogSightlines
With enrollment swelling over 70,000 students, facilities and finance leaders at the University of Massachusetts system and its individual campuses knew they must implement a plan to address this growth while properly maintaining their facilities. Using a comprehensive strategy, the University of Massachusetts system is on track to reduce its deferred maintenance backlog by nearly 30% over the next three years. One representative from the UMass system discussed the benefits of a system-wide approach for handling deferred maintenance, and how Sightlines’ data helped provide the necessary tools.
Change the Conversation to Address Deferred Maintenance - NACUBO 2015Sightlines
Sightlines latest conference presentation, Change the Conversation to Address Deferred Maintenance, offers four perspectives (the national view, a university system, a campus CFO, and campus facility operations) on how to employ data, analysis, and focused communications to strategically plan for success.
This presentation demonstrates how to:
- Use data to document and package deferred maintenance projects and set priorities to fund projects that support the institutional mission and strategic focus.
- Review actual facility metrics, data, and presentations used with leadership, boards, and external constituents to prioritize projects that remove deferred maintenance.
- Communicate the payoffs of deferred maintenance projects (reduced energy consumption, lowered operating costs, improved programs, etc.) versus the additional costs of waiting to fund projects.
Bracken Hendricks | Innovation Showcase | 2014 Solar SymposiumGW Solar Institute
This is an Ignite Style presentation (five minute max presentations with slides that automatically advance every 15 seconds) that was a part of the 2014 Solar Symposium Innovation Showcase.
Bracken Hendricks, CEO, Urban Ingenuity
PACE and Affordable Housing: Find out how Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) financing can fund clean energy retrofits and help solve broader financial challenges for affordable housing developers, owners, and property managers by providing a new capital solution for affordable housing preservation.
Slides from 'The Journey Towards Asset Management Excellence' held 24th July 2014.
It can be difficult to know which asset management approach will help you obtain the maximum value from your assets, while also helping you to keep costs down.
In this free webinar Donald MacDonald will discuss the pros and cons of each approach, as well as examine how these can help you achieve excellence in asset management.
Key Topics:
* The various alternative approaches to asset management available to the FM practitioner.
* The advantages and the disadvantages of each of these approaches.
* The roles that these various approaches play in achieving excellence in asset management.
About Donald:
As Head of Consultancy at Programmed Facility Management, Donald is responsible for Programmed Facility Management's Consultancy team's service provision throughout Australia.
Donald has interests in the development of the FM profession in Australia. He has presented, lectured and had several articles published on topics such as life cycle budgeting, best practice maintenance provision and facilities management in general.
www.programmed.com.au
Similar to University of Denver Case Study - Deferred Maintenance Can Be Managed (20)
State of Sustainability in Higher Education 2017Sightlines
Join Sightlines and the UNH Sustainability Institute as we analyze campus efforts to mitigate and adapt to climate change, provide an update on higher education's progress with energy efficiency, and introduce new data and discussion surrounding space management and mechanical upgrades.
2017 State of Facilities in Higher EducationSightlines
Join Sightlines as we shine a spotlight on the trends and best practices that dominated 2017 and will continue to influence campus facilities nationwide in 2018.
Put Your Facilities Data to Work: 5 Steps for Strengthening Your Case on CampusSightlines
When it comes to obtaining funding, nothing generates greater impact than clearly visible benefits. The data is at your fingertips…but how do you create the compelling context needed to secure that much-needed funding?
Join Sightlines for a revealing look at the power of benchmarking data and how to harness five key components to accurately convey the value that Facilities brings to your institution and make a stronger case for affecting change on campus.
Developing the Capital Plan is Only Half the Battle [ERAPPA 2017]Sightlines
Discover the latest facilities trends in higher education and how Penn State was able to develop a capital plan utilizing advanced "facilities intelligence."
Doing More with Less: Solutions for Managing Facilities on a Limited BudgetSightlines
Sightlines shares how using verifiable data helped three very different institutions successfully create new spaces, reduce maintenance backlogs, and achieve higher levels of efficiency - all without the need to increase funding.
Making the Case for Campus SustainabilitySightlines
Sightlines looks at the interplay between enrollment trends, financial success metrics, and operational success metrics to help build the business case that sustainability is an integral component to a successful facilities operation.
Planning for the Future: Adapting Facilities to Tomorrow's NeedsSightlines
Facilities plays a key role in managing campus growth in ways that support the institution’s overall mission without over-extending available resources. Being able to prepare for the best while planning for the worst, while no easy feat, is essential in today’s rapidly changing marketplace. In this webinar, Sightlines outlines how using data-driven planning to create and communicate a clear vision of your campus facilities can ensure approval for the maintenance and capital projects required to set your campus ahead.
What you'll learn:
- How to better prioritize projects by using a portfolio framework
- A new approach for performing facility assessments that institution stakeholders can act on with confidence
- How to plan to meet future workforce challenges
- Strategies for creating long-term facility plans that account for market volatility
The State of Facilities: Preventing Your Biggest Asset from Becoming Your Big...Sightlines
In this presentation, Sightlines experts explore the trends facing facilities and finance leaders in higher education across the country, facilities challenges facing Ohio institutions, and strategies for success that help improve physical asset management and mitigate risk.
Exploring the State of Sustainability in Higher Education 2016Sightlines
This presentation explores the latest trends and achievements in higher education sustainability and features a review of the 2016 findings by highlighting each stage of the building life cycle.
2016 State of Facilities in Higher EducationSightlines
Get an exclusive look at the 2016 facilities trends in higher education and explore some key insights into the challenges - and opportunities - that face campus facilities managers and finance leaders.
When You Come to a Fork in the Road, Take It: Rutgers & Sightlines ERAPPA 201...Sightlines
In this presentation, Rutgers University discussed their process for establishing best practice policies during the largest merger in Higher Education’s history.
On July 1, 2013, the largest merger in the history of U.S. higher education occurred when Rutgers University and the University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (UMDNJ) created a super-sized Rutgers with 67,000 students, 27 million gross square feet of space and 1,100 additional employees. The merger was only the beginning. In addition to the UMDNJ integration, the facilities departments for housing and satellite campuses were restructured under one facilities umbrella as a unified organization.
As Yogi Berra, a long time New Jersey resident, once said: “When you come to a fork in the road – take it.” Faced with having to manage and deploy over 1,700 people, an annual facilities operating budget of $227 million, and a capital budget of $150 million, consolidation brought Rutgers leadership to that fork in the road.
Since the merger, Rutgers facilities leaders have been navigating in a climate of change and closely examining every aspect of their facilities across multiple campuses, using data-driven, comparative metrics and analysis provided by Sightlines. An expert panel will discuss the process used to engage stakeholders (including administration, faculty, students and staff) and change the philosophy about managing space, operations and capital planning.
Attendees will learn:
How to engage campus leadership and facilities staff about using data and analysis during a time of major change;
How to standardize policies and procedure to maximize quality of services within budgetary constraints;
How to change and manage expectations of the campus community about levels of service for maintenance, custodial and grounds;
How data and analysis can lead to changes in campus philosophy regarding use and interaction of space, capital planning and operations to improve capital investments and facilities operations in significant ways.
From Boiler Room to Board Room: Creating Alignment with Non-Facilities Profes...Sightlines
Learn how Lebanon Valley College and the University of Georgia are creating alignment from the boiler room to the board room using Sightlines' third-party data and analysis.
Prepping for the President: Planning Rutgers' 250th CommencementSightlines
Imagine the President of the United States chooses to make a commencement address at your institution. It’s a big deal, right? What if this ceremony also marked your institution’s 250th anniversary, and you expect more than 50,000 attendees, rain or shine? Then it’s a huge deal. And what if your commencement task force had less than a month to finalize plans? Talk about a perfect storm.
This was situation that Rutgers University faced this spring, when they learned on April 14 that President Obama had decided to make a speech during commencement on May 15.
This presentation explores the historic visit and the massive preparation effort involved in its execution from Tony Calcado, Senior Vice President, Institutional Planning and Operations, who served as chair of the commencement task force. Hear about logistics challenges including transportation, public safety and off-site locations.
Sightlines Membership Update - The Value of Integration with GordianSightlines
This presentation explores recent Sightlines membership updates and the value of our integration with Gordian. As part of a new, larger organization, Sightlines is now able to offer enhancements and added value to those with whom we work. Examples include:
- Improvements to our current Facilities Intelligence Solutions leveraging RSMeans cost estimation data and technical expertise
- Enhanced strategic reviews of capital project management processes
- Integration with Gordian's offerings across the full lifecycle of construction including Job Order Contracting procurement solutions.
Data & Sustainability: How the Right Data Creates SuccessSightlines
Many sustainability officers are stretched thin by their duties, which includes a heavy workload of measuring and reporting data, both internally and externally. Despite this potential drawback, data is not the enemy of sustainability leaders. In fact, data and sustainability can go hand-in-hand as you build your case and outline opportunities for future improvements.
In this presentation, you'll learn:
- How data can help you overcome industry trends and make a difference on campus
- Ways data can build constituency around sustainability goals
- The value of verified data & peer context
- How reporting burdens can be eased
Taming Deferred Maintenance Before the Roof Caves In (2016 Sightlines NACUBO ...Sightlines
The growing need for capital renewal on both U.S. and Canadian campuses threatens to overwhelm many institutions. Business officers and facility managers have figured out strategies to break down deferred maintenance (DM) into smaller portfolios of work to manage over time, thereby mitigating the risk of building failures and buying time to acquire resources to address campus deficiencies. Hear how several campuses have set priorities, applied limited funding, evaluated whether to demolish or renovate buildings with high levels of DM, and won the confidence of stakeholders and funders to successfully address deferred maintenance.
Speakers:
Mike Gower, CFO, Rutgers University
Harold Hewitt, CFO, Chapman University
Mark Schiff, President, Sightlines
Hugh Warren, AVP, Operations & Maintenance, University of Alberta
Creating Alignment with Non-Facilities Professionals - APPA 2016Sightlines
How does the facilities manager create alignment with non-facilities professionals and up the reporting ladder? How do you assure yourself a seat at the table where you can communicate past successes and future investment requirements to drive the institution forward and deliver best-in-class service? You can use data, like many facilities leaders nationwide, who are arming themselves with validated longitudinal data, peer comparisons, and predictive analytics. By creating a common vocabulary that can be understood and communicated from the boiler room to the boardroom, you become a better partner to all constituents at your institution.
Presenters:
Ralph Johnson, AVP, Facilities Management Division, University of Georgia
Don Santostefano, Senior Director, Facilities Management, Lebanon Valley College
Kevan Will, Account Manager, Sightlines
How to Split Bills in the Odoo 17 POS ModuleCeline George
Bills have a main role in point of sale procedure. It will help to track sales, handling payments and giving receipts to customers. Bill splitting also has an important role in POS. For example, If some friends come together for dinner and if they want to divide the bill then it is possible by POS bill splitting. This slide will show how to split bills in odoo 17 POS.
We all have good and bad thoughts from time to time and situation to situation. We are bombarded daily with spiraling thoughts(both negative and positive) creating all-consuming feel , making us difficult to manage with associated suffering. Good thoughts are like our Mob Signal (Positive thought) amidst noise(negative thought) in the atmosphere. Negative thoughts like noise outweigh positive thoughts. These thoughts often create unwanted confusion, trouble, stress and frustration in our mind as well as chaos in our physical world. Negative thoughts are also known as “distorted thinking”.
Instructions for Submissions thorugh G- Classroom.pptxJheel Barad
This presentation provides a briefing on how to upload submissions and documents in Google Classroom. It was prepared as part of an orientation for new Sainik School in-service teacher trainees. As a training officer, my goal is to ensure that you are comfortable and proficient with this essential tool for managing assignments and fostering student engagement.
Palestine last event orientationfvgnh .pptxRaedMohamed3
An EFL lesson about the current events in Palestine. It is intended to be for intermediate students who wish to increase their listening skills through a short lesson in power point.
Welcome to TechSoup New Member Orientation and Q&A (May 2024).pdfTechSoup
In this webinar you will learn how your organization can access TechSoup's wide variety of product discount and donation programs. From hardware to software, we'll give you a tour of the tools available to help your nonprofit with productivity, collaboration, financial management, donor tracking, security, and more.
Unit 8 - Information and Communication Technology (Paper I).pdfThiyagu K
This slides describes the basic concepts of ICT, basics of Email, Emerging Technology and Digital Initiatives in Education. This presentations aligns with the UGC Paper I syllabus.
Read| The latest issue of The Challenger is here! We are thrilled to announce that our school paper has qualified for the NATIONAL SCHOOLS PRESS CONFERENCE (NSPC) 2024. Thank you for your unwavering support and trust. Dive into the stories that made us stand out!
2. University of Denver Campus Profile
University of Denver is the
oldest and largest private
university in the Rocky
Mountain region of the
United States.
• Founded: 1864
• Located: Denver, Colorado
• Number of Buildings: 120
• Total GSF: 4,710,000
• Number of Students:
10,408
3. Policies and Strategies to Manage Facility Challenges
• Increase Stewardship
• Increase Planned Maintenance
• Define the backlog of deferred projects
• Use building portfolios to define and manage
capital investments
4. Strategy – Identify the Backlog
$90
$80
$70
$60
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$0
Millions
Identified Building Need
Distribution by Building Portfolio and Priority
A (1‐3 years)
B (4‐7 years)
C (8‐15 years)
Total Need by Portfolio
A B C
A B C Total
$ 43,894,344 $ 50,771,712 $ 50,847,621 $ 145,513,677
Data in FY2007 dollars
Total Need ‐ $145.5 million
5. Strategy – Create a Funding Plan (1 of 2)
• A 5 year funding plan
was created, repairs
outside the 5 year period
were not considered.
• Funding for repairs is
based on a building’s
classification, with
funding for transitional
buildings only on a “as
needed” basis.
• Parking structure
maintenance was
budgeted for in the
parking office budget,
outside of facilities.
$90
$80
$70
$60
$50
$40
$30
$20
$10
$0
Legacy Millennium Transitional Parking/
Infrastructure/Other
Millions
Summary – The $64M Investment Plan
Total Need Funding Plan
6. Strategy – Create a Funding Plan (2 of 2)
Core Program
Total Infrastructure Improvements*
5-Year Investment Needs $ 6 4,000,000 $ 4 8,000,000 $ 1 6,000,000
Required Annual Funding Level $ 12,800,000 $ 9,600,000 $ 3,200,000
Sources:
Annual Capital Renewal Funds:
Facilities Management 2 ,750,000 2 ,750,000 -
Provost - Renewal & Modernization 5 40,000 - 540,000
Residence 2 50,000 1 50,000 100,000
Annual One-Time Funds by Source:
Year End Funds 2 ,500,000 2 ,500,000 -
Unit Gainsharing Funds 2 ,560,000 - 2,560,000
Future-Year Budget Additions to Facilities 4 ,200,000 4 ,200,000 -
Total Sources $ 12,800,000 $ 9,600,000 $ 3,200,000
•Funding at the targeted $12.8 million level was not achieved immediately, but built up to over a
period of time.
•Not all the funding was achieved through the operating budget, some funding was taken from end
of year dollars and other one-time funding.
•Funding for “Program Improvements” was assumed to come from individual units through their
“gainshare” funds.
7. Strategy – Track Performance Relative to Plan (1 of 3)
$30
$25
$20
$15
$10
$5
$0
Stewardship Benchmark - $12,800,000
FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Millions
Stewardship Funding by Type
Millennium Legacy Beneficial Transition Other* Rental
8. Strategy – Track Performance Relative to Plan (2 of 3)
$30
$25
$20
$15
$10
$5
$0
Stewardship Benchmark - $12,800,000
FY00 FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 FY05 FY06 FY07 FY08 FY09 FY10 FY11 FY12
Millions
Stewardship by Portfolio Type
IFP Expenditures Additional Expenditures
9. New Buildings & Renovations Set Stage for Building
Repairs (3 of 3)
• Capital expenditures for new
construction and reinvestment have
exceeded the stewardship standard
for all years shown.
• The new buildings add additional
square footage to the campus and
their technical complexity makes
them more expensive buildings to
maintain than the buildings that they
replaced. As these buildings age they
will put increasing demands on the
Facility investment needs of the
University.
• In the past 13 years, the University
has spent over $339 million on new
construction and reinvested another
$144 million in existing buildings.
• The $27 million that was reinvested
into buildings in FY 12 is the highest
amount in the past 13 years. This is
due in large part to the $12.6 million
that was spent on the Academic
Commons project.
$100,000,000
$90,000,000
$80,000,000
$70,000,000
$60,000,000
$50,000,000
$40,000,000
$30,000,000
$20,000,000
$10,000,000
$0
Capital Investment by Fiscal Year
Stewardship benchmark $12,800,000
FY00FY01FY02FY03FY04FY05FY06FY07FY08FY09FY10FY11FY12
Reinvestment New Construction
10. A Significant Shift in Campus Age Using Moderate
Balance Sheet Leverage
1995 2012
4,000
3,500
3,000
2,500
2,000
1,500
1,000
500
0
Total Square Footage 2,825,569 3,646,539
Greater than 75 Years 178,387 189,563
41-75 Years 855,701 1,192,055
26-40 Years 1,217,808 415,510
10-25 Years 555,387 1,056,175
Less than 10 years 18,286 793,236
Square Footage
Thousands
Campus Square Footage by Age
21% of campus
under 25 years old
51% of campus
under 25 years old
11. Results – A Legacy of Funding not Deferral (1 of 2)
$12,000
$10,000
$8,000
$6,000
$4,000
$2,000
$‐
Integrated Facilities Plan for Legacy/Beneficial and Millennium
Buildings
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010 FY 2011 FY 2012 FY 2013 FY 2014 FY 2015 FY2016 FY2017 FY2018
Millennium Buildings: Core Sinking Fund Addition Millennium Buildings: Spending for Core Needs
Legacy/Beneficial Buildings: Spending for Core Needs Base Budget plus Year End Funding for Core Needs
Category Definitions:Legacy: buildings that have a strong historical or programmatic heritage for the University and warrant preservation.Millennium: buildings constructed since 1997 and built to a 100 year construction quality.Transitional: buildings that are deemed as poor quality assets and spaces that will be raised within a 15 year horizon.Parking & Infrastructure: Parking structures and campus hardscape, greenscape, and utility infrastructure.
Thischart illustrates the University's capital expenditures by fiscal year distinguishable between new construction and discrete projects for renovation, modernization or adaptation of existing facilities. The Stewardship benchmark as presented to the Building & Grounds Committee represents all of the A&B priorities as set by the Facilities IFP for the Legacy and Millennium portfolios and includes the Reliability and Asset Preservation Needs for the other buildings.